Valproate is an effective, well-tolerated drug for treatment of status epilepticus/serial attacks in adults

Objective – Status epilepticus (SE) and serial attacks (SA) represent neurological emergencies, and mortality rate for SE/SA is high, ranging from 3% to 25%, depending on cause and co-morbidity. As SE/SA become more refractory to treatment over time, rapid, appropriate treatment is extremely important. Here, we report a prospective registration of the effect of intravenous (IV) valproate (VPA) on SE/SA in a group of Norwegian patients.
Patients and methods – Forty-one adult patients (18 males, 23 females) were included in the study. All had previously been unsuccessfully treated with diazepam. For 19, the main SE/SA seizure type was generalized tonic-clonic, while 16 had complex-partial seizures. Six had seizures that were difficult to classify. The treatment protocol recommended 25 mg/kg of VPA loading dose over 30 min, followed by continuous infusion of 100 mg/h for at least 24 h, then per oral administration. If seizures persisted after the loading dose, general anaesthesia (barbiturates/propofol/midazolam) was administered.
Results – No serious side effects were reported. In 76% of the cases (31 of 41), SE/SA stopped and anaesthesia was not required. Of the patients treated within 3 h, only 5% needed anaesthesia, whereas of those treated after 3–24 h, 38% needed anaesthesia. Of those who waited for more than 24 h before treatment, 60% required anaesthesia. Furthermore, 60% of the patients who needed anaesthesia were given loading doses below 2100 mg.
Conclusions – VPA seems to be a safe, effective treatment of SE/SA, but efficacy is dependent on time lapse between symptoms and VPA treatment, and administration of a sufficiently high loading dose.     

The safety of rapid valproic acid infusion

PURPOSE: The recommended rate of administration of valproic acid injection is 20 mg/min. Drug delivery at this rate may be inadequate for expeditious control of seizures. The safety of rapid infusion of valproic acid has not been established, and this study was designed to explore the effects of rapid infusion in patients with acute seizures. METHODS: Twenty patients with acute repetitive seizures received 20 mg/kg loading doses of valproic acid. Infusion rates ranged from 33.3 to 555 mg/min (median, 200 mg/min). Sixteen patients had received previous or concomitant antiepileptic drugs, with inadequate seizure control. Heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate were measured before infusion and at frequent intervals for 1 hour after infusion. Patients were also observed for changes in level of alertness and signs of local irritation. RESULTS: No patient exhibited a decline in level of consciousness or respiratory function. Two patients with significant contributing factors exhibited declines in blood pressure requiring vasopressors. No significant local irritation was reported. Although efficacy was not a measured end point, seizures were abolished in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Infusion of valproic acid at rates between 33 and 555 mg/min is well tolerated. No serious adverse effects attributable to the rapid infusion of valproic acid were encountered, although valproic acid, along with other factors, may have contributed to the hypotension in two patients. Intravenous valproic acid is an option for the control of acute seizures.     

Treatment of status epilepticus and acute repetitive seizures with i.v. valproic acid vs phenytoin

Objective – To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the treatment with valproic acid (VPA) in patients with status epilepticus (SE) or acute repetitive seizures (ARS) comparing it with phenytoin (PHT) treatment. Materials and methods – Patients with SE or ARS were treated in a consecutive manner with either VPA or PHT intravenously. The primary endpoint was defined as clinical seizure cessation; the secondary endpoint was evaluation of drug tolerability. Results – Seventy‐four adult patients with SE or ARS participated in the study, 49 with VPA i.v. and 25 PHT i.v. In 43 (87.8%) of the VPA patients, the seizures discontinued, and no rescue medication was needed. Similar results were found in the PHT group in which seizures of 22 (88%) patients were well controlled. Side effects were found in 12% of the PHT group, and in none of the VPA group. Conclusions – VPA i.v. seems to be effective and well tolerated in adult patients with SE or ARS.     

Therapy of Infantile Spasms with Valproate: Results of a Prospective Study

In a prospective study, 22 children with recently manifested infantile spasms (18 patients with symptomatic and 4 with idiopathic infantile spasms) were treated with sodium valproate (VPA). Before VPA was instituted, a loading test was performed to exclude abnormal patterns of VPA metabolites by gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy of serum and urine. This test was repeated during VPA therapy; an abnormal pattern of VPA metabolites was not observed. VPA was started in increasing dosage until infantile spasms were controlled or a maximum dose of 100 mg/kg/day was reached. If VPA did not control seizures or at least reduce frequency significantly after a trial of 4-6 weeks, dexamathasone was added to VPA. If focal seizures occurred in association with localized epileptogenic EEG discharges, carbamazepine (CBZ) was added to VPA. After 4 weeks of VPA monotherapy, infantile spasms were controlled in 11 children. After 3 months of therapy, 16 children were free of seizures (14 patients VPA monotherapy), and 4 children had reduction of seizure frequency to less than 25%. VPA doses varied between 40 and 100 mg/kg/day (mean 74). The mean plasma concentration was 113 micrograms/ml (range 46-177). After 6 months of therapy, total seizure control was achieved in 20 of 22 patients (16 children VPA monotherapy). The mean observation time was 16 1/2 months (range 6-36 months). There were seven relapses in six children during the first 7 months of therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Successful initiation of combined therapy with valproate sodium injection and divalproex sodium extended-release tablets in the epilepsy monitoring unit

Summary: Purpose: Patients in epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) often require aggressive initiation or reinitiation of therapy before discharge. We developed a simple dosing scheme using valproate sodium injection (VPA‐IV) and divalproex sodium extended‐release (VPA‐ER) tablets to minimize the time required for initiation of therapy, without increasing the likelihood of seizures and adverse effects. Methods: We identified 42 patients in the EMU, naïve to VPA‐IV and VPA‐ER, for whom one of the discharge AEDs included divalproex sodium. On the day of discharge, patients were loaded with 20 mg/kg VPA‐IV at 6 mg/kg/min, followed by ～20 mg/kg VPA‐ER within 1 h. The discharge daily dose of VPA‐ER was identical to the dose given after the IV load. We assessed tolerability and seizure occurrence during infusion, at 1 h, 4 h, and 1 week after discharge. Results: All patients tolerated the VPA‐IV dose followed by VPA‐ER. Four patients reported mild nausea, and two patients reported mild dizziness within 4 h. No seizures or significant changes in heart rate or blood pressure occurred within 4 h, and all patients were discharged the same day. All patients denied systemic complaints at 1 week, and five had seizures during the week after discharge. All patients had improved seizure frequencies at the end of the first week. Conclusions: VPA‐IV is well tolerated and convenient for rapid loading in the EMU. When promptly followed by VPA‐ER, seizure control remains excellent.     

Intravenous levetiracetam in children with epilepsy

Intravenous levetiracetam recently became available for use in patients aged >16 years. There are few data about its safety and efficacy in children. We retrospectively analyzed data from children treated with intravenous levetiracetam. Ten patients (6 female, 4 male), aged 3 weeks to 19 years, were treated with intravenous levetiracetam at a mean dose of 50.5 mg/kg/day for a mean duration of 4.9 days. Four patients received intravenous levetiracetam for acute repetitive seizures/status epilepticus, and three as replacement for oral levetiracetam because administration of oral levetiracetam was temporarily infeasible. One patient each received intravenous levetiracetam for seizure prophylaxis during brain biopsy, as maintenance treatment after acute seizures, and as substitute for sodium valproate. Three of four patients with acute repetitive seizures/status epilepticus became seizure-free; the fourth patient had a partial reduction in seizure frequency. All three patients who received intravenous levetiracetam as substitute for oral levetiracetam tolerated the switch well. The other three patients were seizure-free on intravenous levetiracetam. No serious adverse effects were observed, and all patients completed treatment with intravenous levetiracetam for the intended period. Intravenous levetiracetam may be effective in various clinical situations requiring intravenous administration of an antiepileptic drug.     

Continuous EEG monitoring and midazolam infusion for refractory nonconvulsive status epilepticus

BACKGROUND: Although cIV-MDZ has emerged as a popular alternative to barbiturate therapy for refractory status epilepticus (RSE), experience with its use for this indication is limited. OBJECTIVE:- To evaluate the efficacy of continuous intravenous midazolam (cIV-MDZ) for attaining sustained seizure control in patients with RSE. METHODS: The authors reviewed 33 episodes of RSE treated with cIV-MDZ in their neurologic intensive care unit over 6 years. All patients were monitored with continuous EEG (cEEG). MDZ infusion rates were titrated to eliminate clinical and EEG seizure activity; cIV-MDZ was discontinued once patients were seizure-free for 24 hours. Acute treatment failures (seizures 1 to 6 hours after starting cIV-MDZ), breakthrough seizures (after 6 hours of therapy), post-treatment seizures (within 48 hours of discontinuing therapy), and ultimate treatment failure (frequent seizures that led to treatment with pentobarbital or propofol) were identified. RESULTS: All patients were in nonconvulsive SE at the time cIV-MDZ was started; the mean duration of SE before treatment was 3.9 days (range 0 to 17 days). In addition to benzodiazepines, 94% of patients had received at least two antiepileptic drugs (AED) before starting cIV-MDZ. The mean loading dose was 0.19 mg/kg, the mean maximal infusion rate was 0.22 mg/kg/h, and the mean duration of cIV-MDZ therapy was 4.2 days (range 1 to 14 days). Acute treatment failure occurred in 18% (6/33) of episodes, breakthrough seizures in 56% (18/32), post-treatment seizures in 68% (19/28), and ultimate treatment failure in 18% (6/33). Breakthrough seizures were clinically subtle or purely electrographic in 89% (16/18) of cases and were associated with an increased risk of developing post-treatment seizures (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although most patients with RSE initially responded to cIV-MDZ, over half developed subsequent breakthrough seizures, which were predictive of post-treatment seizures and were often detectable only with cEEG. Titrating cIV-MDZ to burst suppression, more aggressive treatment with concurrent AED, or a longer period of initial treatment may reduce the high proportion of patients with RSE who relapse after cIV-MDZ is discontinued.     

Use of intravenous levetiracetam for management of acute seizures in neonates

Antiepileptic drugs used for the treatment of neonatal seizures have limited efficacy and undesirable side effects, leading to increased off-label use in neonates. Intravenous levetiracetam became available in August 2006 for use in patients above 16 years of age. Insufficient data are available about the efficacy and safety of intravenous levetiracetam in neonates. Data captured from our institution's electronic medical records were retrospectively analyzed for neonates treated with intravenous levetiracetam between January 2007 and December 2009. Data were acquired by reviewing our electronic medical records. Twenty-two patients received a levetiracetam load of 10-50 mg/kg for neonatal seizures. Nineteen of 22 patients (86%) demonstrated immediate seizure cessation at 1 hour. Seven of 22 patients (32%) achieved complete seizure cessation after administration of the loading dose, 14 (64%) achieved seizure cessation by 24 hours, 19 (86%) by 48 hours, and all 22 (100%) by 72 hours. No serious side effects were evident. Nineteen patients (86%) were discharged on oral levetiracetam, and only two patients (9%) were discharged with an additional oral antiepileptic drug. Intravenous levetiracetam can be used as monotherapy and adjunctively in acute seizure management during the neonatal period.     

High‐dose intravenous levetiracetam for acute seizure exacerbation in children with intractable epilepsy

We review our experience with high‐dose intravenous levetiracetam (IV‐LEV) for acute seizure exacerbations in nine children with medically intractable epilepsy. All children had acute repetitive seizures—while on chronic antiepileptic drugs—that either led to hospitalization (eight) or occurred during hospitalization (one), and received doses of IV‐LEV of 150 mg/kg/day or greater, with a mean dose of 228 ± 48 mg/kg/day. Eight of nine children had resolution of the acute repetitive seizures. Seizure frequency was reduced to less than baseline in seven children (seizure‐free in two, ≥80% reduction in four, and 50% reduction in one). Except for one child with increased seizures, IV‐LEV was well tolerated in all children without complications.     

Intravenous lacosamide for treatment of status epilepticus

Kellinghaus C, Berning S, Immisch I, Larch J, Rosenow F, Rossetti AO, Tilz C, Trinka E. Intravenous lacosamide for treatment of status epilepticus.
Acta Neurol Scand: 2011: 123: 137–141.
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Objectives – Treatment of established status epilepticus (SE) requires immediate intravenous anticonvulsant therapy. Currently used first‐line drugs may cause potentially hazardous side effects. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous lacosamide (LCM) in SE after failure of standard treatment. Methods – We retrospectively analyzed 39 patients (21 women, 18 men, median age 62 years) from the hospital databases of five neurological departments in Germany, Austria and Switzerland between September 2008 and January 2010 who were admitted in SE and received at least one dose of intravenous LCM. Results – Types of SE were generalized convulsive (n = 6), complex partial (n = 17) and simple partial (n = 16). LCM was administered after failure of benzodiazepins or other standard drugs in all but one case. Median bolus dose of LCM was 400 mg (range 200–400 mg), which was administered at 40–80 mg/min in those patients where infusion rate was documented. SE stopped after LCM in 17 patients, while 22 patients needed further anticonvulsant treatment. The success rate in patients receiving LCM as first or second drug was 3/5, as third drug 11/19, and as fourth or later drug 3/15. In five subjects, SE could not be terminated at all. No serious adverse events attributed to LCM were documented. Conclusions – Intravenous LCM may be an alternative treatment for established SE after failure of standard therapy, or when standard agents are considered unsuitable.     

Relationship of Carbamazepine Reduction Rate to Seizure Frequency During Inpatient Telemetry

Summary: To establish guidelines for medication reduction during inpatient telemetry, the records of 18 children and young adults with refractory partial seizures undergoing carbamazepine (CBZ) reductions during continuous video/EEG telemetry were reviewed. Six patients were receiving CBZ monotherapy, and 12 patients were treated with an additional antiepileptic drug (AED) maintained at baseline dosage during CBZ taper. Despite relatively rapid mean reductions in dosage of 44% by day 2 of taper, no patients experienced frequent repetitive seizures or status epilepticus (SE). Seizure rate during the entire CBZ reduction period correlated significantly with rate of drug reduction. Linear regression analysis showed drug reduction rate to be a good predictor of seizure rate. Fourteen patients experienced at least three seizures during CBZ taper. On the average, the third seizure occurred on day 5 of taper at a percentage of dose seduction of 79%. In 8 patients, CBZ concentrations were measured both before taper and ≤24 h after the third seizure. For these patients, seizure rate also correlated significantly with reduction in CBZ level. We conclude that manipulation of CBZ dose reduction rate is important in maximizing seizure frequency during telemetry and, in our patients, a relatively rapid rate of dose reduction was safe and effective in promoting seizure recordings.     

Pentobarbital and EEG burst suppression in treatment of status epilepticus refractory to benzodiazepines and phenytoin

Seven patients with complex partial or secondarily generalized tonic-clonic status epilepticus (SE) refractory to benzodiazepines (BZDs) and phenytoin (PHT) were treated with pentobarbital (PTB) coma with an EEG burst suppression (BSP) pattern. PTB administered by continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion pump at a loading dose of 6-8 mg/kg in 40-60 min was usually sufficient to produce BSP activity and seizure control. PTB was continued 0-24 h at 1-4 mg/kg/h, adjusted to maintain blood pressure (BP) and BSP. Infusion rate was decreased if systolic BP (SBP) was less than 90 mm Hg. Normal saline fluid challenge was occasionally used to elevate BP, but in no case was it necessary to discontinue PTB infusion or use pressors. Other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were maintained at therapeutic levels for chronic seizure protection. Seizures were stopped in all cases. Four patients attained premorbid neurologic status, two patients briefly survived in vegetative states with recurring seizures after PTB withdrawal, and one patient died of asystole after receiving PTB for 7 h. Patients who had poor outcomes had prolonged seizures (16 h to 3 weeks) before institution of PTB anesthesia, and all had significant underlying central nervous system (CNS) pathology. PTB-induced BSP appears to be safe and effective for refractory SE if it is started soon after failure of a BZD and PHT. Ultimate prognosis depends on SE etiology.     

Serum valproate concentrations in epileptic children with favourable responses

The lower limits of the "therapeutic range" for serum levels of sodium valproate (VPA) were evaluated in epileptic children showing a benign clinical course. Twenty-five outpatients, aged 5 to 16 years, whose seizures were well controlled over three years with VPA alone, were studied. Venous blood was taken 1.1 to 5 hrs after the morning dose. Serum VPA concentrations at steady-state after receiving the maintenance doses to control seizures were determined by enzyme immunoassay. The patients were divided into three groups according to the seizure type and the age at onset; A and B: patients with tonic and/or clonic seizures, aged below 3 yrs (n = 11) and 3 to 11 yrs (n = 6), respectively, C: those with absence seizures, aged 4 to 11 yrs (n = 8). The serum concentrations in A (47.8 +/- 21.6 micrograms/ml, mean +/- SD) were significantly (p less than 0.02) lower than those in groups B and C (85.2 +/- 14.0 and 73.0 +/- 17.4 micrograms/ml, respectively). VPA concentrations below 50 micrograms/ml were seen in 6 patients (55%) in group A. It was concluded that many epileptic children, whose ages at onset were below 3 yrs, with tonic and/or clonic seizures could be controlled even with low initial serum concentrations below the "therapeutic range".     

Rectal diazepam gel for treatment of acute repetitive seizures in adults

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of diazepam (DZP) rectal gel (Diastat; Elan Pharmaceuticals, Dublin, Ireland) for the treatment of acute repetitive seizures in adult patients in 2 multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel studies. METHODS: Ninety-six adults 18 years or older with acute repetitive seizures, 70 of whom received treatment, were randomized into the 2 studies. Active and placebo medications were supplied in prefilled, identical-appearing delivery systems. In study 001, patients received a second dose 4 hours after the initial treatment. Patients in study 003 received only 1 treatment. Patients were observed for 12 hours after the first dose. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in seizure frequency in patients who received DZP compared with the placebo group. The median number of seizures per hour in the group treated with DZP rectal gel was 0.00, vs 0.13 in the placebo group (P =.002). In addition, significantly more DZP rectal gel-treated patients remained seizure-free during the 12-hour observation period (71% [22/31] vs 28% [11/39]). Using Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis, time to the next seizure was found to be significantly longer in DZP rectal gel-treated than placebo-treated patients (P<.001). Global assessment as provided by the caregivers was in favor of DZP rectal gel for both study 001 (P =.17) and study 003 (P =.02). Dizziness and somnolence were the only central nervous system adverse events that occurred more frequently in patients receiving DZP rectal gel than in those receiving placebo. CONCLUSION: In adults, rectal DZP formulated as Diastat significantly reduced the likelihood of seizure recurrence during an episode of acute repetitive seizures, with minimal safety concerns.     

Lamotrigine versus valproic acid as first-line monotherapy in newly diagnosed typical absence seizures: an open-label, randomized, parallel-group study

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of lamotrigine (LTG) and valproic acid (VPA) in newly diagnosed children and adolescents with typical absence seizures. METHODS: A randomized, open-label parallel-group design was used. After undergoing an awake video-EEG recording, which included one to two trials of 3 min of hyperventilation and intermittent photic stimulation, eligible patients were randomized to receive LTG or VPA. LTG was initiated at a daily dose of 0.5 mg/kg for 2 weeks in two divided doses, followed by 1.0 mg/kg/day for an additional 2 weeks. Thereafter, doses were increased in 1-mg/kg/day increments every 5 days until seizures were controlled, intolerable adverse effects occurred, or a maximum dose of 12 mg/kg/day had been reached. VPA was equally uptitrated according to clinical response, starting at 10 mg/kg and increasing by 5 mg/kg/24 h every 3 days, if required, to a maximum of 30 mg/kg/day in three divided doses. Patients were seen in the clinic every month for < or = 12 months.The primary efficacy end point at each visit was seizure freedom, defined as lack of clinically observed seizures since the previous visit and lack of electroclinical seizures during ambulatory 24-h EEG testing and a video-EEG session with hyperventilation. RESULTS: Thirty-eight children (17 boys, 21 girls), aged from 3 to 13 years (mean, 7.5 years), all newly diagnosed with childhood or juvenile typical absence seizures, were enrolled. After 1 month of treatment, 10 (52.6%) of 19 children taking VPA and one (5.3%) of 19 taking LTG were seizure free (p = 0.004). By the 3-month follow-up, 12 (63.1%) children taking VPA and seven (36.8%) taking LTG were controlled (p = 0.19). After 12 months, 13 children taking VPA (dose range, 20-30 mg/kg/day; mean serum level, 76.8 mg/L; range, 51.4-91 mg/L) and 10 taking LTG (dose range, 2-11 mg/kg/day; mean serum level, 8.1 mg/L; range, 1.1-18 mg/L) were seizure free (p = 0.51). Side effects were mostly mild and transient and were recorded in two (10.6%) children treated with VPA and in six (31.8%) treated with LTG. CONCLUSIONS: Both VPA and LTG can be efficacious against absence seizures, although VPA shows a much faster onset of action, at least in part because of its shorter titration schedule.     

Steady-state pharmacokinetic simulation of intermittent vs. continuous infusion valproic acid therapy in non-critically ill and critically ill patients

Objectives: Valproic acid (VPA) is a broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug used for a variety of neurologic disorders. The relatively short half-life seen with intermittent intravenous bolus doing may lead to serum concentration variability. Continuous infusion VPA therapy is an approach to mitigate these effects. The objective of this study is to characterize the pharmacokinetics of continuous infusion of VPA in acutely ill patients and to determine dosing regimens that most frequently obtain goal steady-state serum concentrations.

Methods: This is a retrospective pharmacokinetics study in adult patients receiving continuous infusion VPA per institutional protocol for seizure or status migrainosus. Pharmacokinetic parameters were reviewed for 234 patients (25 critically ill) and compared between the two groups (non-critically ill vs. critically ill). Intermittent and continuous infusion dosing strategies were modeled utilizing Monte Carlo simulations for both cohorts. Frequencies of serum concentration attainment were reported.

Results: The percent target attainment for the non-critically ill group and critically ill group were 69.4 and 58.3% (p = 0.282) post-loading dose and 69.7 and 37.5% (p = 0.004) steady state, respectively. The volume of distribution was significantly different between the two groups (0.35 vs. 0.68 L/kg, p = < 0.0001). Highest frequency of target attainment (50–100 mcg/ml) occurred in the continuous infusion 2 mg/kg/h simulation for both critically ill (45.19%) and acutely ill (48.16%) groups.

Discussion: Critically ill patients have an increased volume of distribution. Increasing the volume of distribution requires higher loading doses of VPA to obtain desired therapeutic concentrations. Continuous infusion VPA provides more consistent serum steady-state concentrations while mitigating pharmacokinetic variability.     

Factors influencing response to intravenous lacosamide in emergency situations: LACO-IV study

Status epilepticus (SE) and acute repetitive seizures (ARSs) frequently result in emergency visits. Wide variations in response are seen with standard antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Oral and intravenous (IV) formulations of lacosamide are approved as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of partial-onset seizures in adults and adolescents. The aim of the retrospective multicenter observational study (LACO-IV) was to analyze data from a large cohort of patients with SE or ARSs of varying severity and etiology, who received IV lacosamide in the emergency setting. Patient clinical data were entered into a database; lacosamide use and efficacy and tolerability variables were analyzed. In SE, IV lacosamide tended to be used mainly in nonconvulsive status epilepticus as second- or third-line treatment. The proportion of patients with no seizures when IV lacosamide was the last drug administered was 76.5% (70.9% SE and 83.7% ARSs). The rate of seizure cessation ≤ 24 h after IV lacosamide administration was 57.1% (49.1% SE and 67.4% ARSs). Of the factors analyzed, a shorter latency from seizure onset to IV lacosamide infusion influenced treatment response significantly. A nonsignificant tendency towards a higher response was seen with lacosamide dose > 200 mg versus ≤ 200 mg. Analysis of response according to mechanism of action showed no significant differences in response to IV lacosamide in patients receiving prior sodium channel blocker (SCB) or non-SCB AEDs in the overall or SE population; however, in ARSs, a tendency towards a higher response was observed in those receiving non-SCB AEDs. The frequency and nature of adverse events observed were in line with those reported in other studies (somnolence being the most frequent). In the absence of randomized prospective controlled studies of IV lacosamide, our observations suggest that IV lacosamide may be a potential alternative for treatment of SE/ARSs when seizures fail to improve with standard AEDs or when AEDs are contraindicated or not recommended.     

Use of levetiracetam in hospitalized patients

PURPOSE: The objective of the study was to analyze the short-term efficacy and safety of levetiracetam (LEV) to treat repetitive seizures in hospitalized patients. METHODS: During admission to a tertiary hospital, we retrospectively identified patients with repetitive seizures who were treated for the first time with LEV during a hospital stay. LEV was considered effective if seizure cessation or >75% seizure reduction occurred in the 24 h after starting LEV (compared with the previous 48 h), requiring no further antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment. RESULTS: Thirty patients (12 men, 18 women) were included. Mean age was 59.7 years. Most frequent seizure type was focal motor in 12 (40%) of 30 patients. Most frequent etiology was stroke: nine (30%) of 30 patients. Relevant medical conditions included atrial fibrillation (three) and hepatic disease (three). Concomitant medications included oral anticoagulants (seven), corticosteroids (two), and chemotherapy (two). Four patients received LEV as the only AED. Six patients with focal SE and 20 (66.6%) patients with clusters of seizures but not in SE received LEV as add-on treatment after lack of response to first-line AEDs. Mean LEV dose during first day was 1,119 mg. Mean daily maintenance dose was 1,724 mg. LEV was effective in 24 (80%) patients, all four patients who received it as the only AED, four of six patients with focal SE, and 16 of 20 patients with clusters of seizures. Three (10%) elderly patients with seizures secondary to stroke and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) reported moderate/severe somnolence and dizziness, leading to treatment discontinuation in one. On discharge, 20 (66.7%) patients continued on LEV, nine (30%) as the only AED. CONCLUSIONS: LEV is effective and safe to treat repetitive seizures in hospitalized patients, including patients in focal SE.     

Comparison of the Anticonvulsant Efficacies and Neurotoxic Effects of Valproic Acid, Phenytoin, and the Ketogenic Diet

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure quantitatively the effectiveness of the ketogenic diet (KD) in comparison to two clinically important anticonvulsant drugs (AEDs), valproic acid (VPA) and phenytoin (PHT), and to evaluate possible associated neurotoxicity. METHODS: Rats were maintained on either a calorie-restricted, KD or calorie-restricted, rodent-chow diet for 3-5 weeks, after which neurobehavioral and seizure testing was completed. AEDs (either VPA or PHT) were injected acutely at the time to peak effect before neurotoxic and seizure assessment. Seizures were induced by timed infusion of pentylenetetrazole (PTZ) and maximal electroshock (MES). RESULTS: VPA protected from both MES- and PTZ-induced seizures, whereas the KD only elevated PTZ seizure threshold; PHT only attenuated MES-induced seizures. The KD was as effective as a high dose of VPA (i.e., 300 mg/kg) and combined treatment (i.e., KD + VPA) showed an additive increase in PTZ seizure threshold. No observed neurobehavioral deficits were associated with either diet treatment; however, drug-related side effects were noted with high doses of either VPA or PHT. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the KD ranks among VPA and PHT as an effective treatment for seizures, without observed drug-associated neurobehavioral contraindications. In combination with AEDs, our results indicate that the KD plus VPA work synergistically to increase seizure threshold, whereas the KD plus PHT may be complementary, elevating seizure threshold (KD) and reducing seizure severity (PHT). These findings may provide insights into future directions for rational polytherapy; however, it is important to be aware that the KD has been shown to elevate VPA-induced hepatotoxicity.