Five‐year cost‐effectiveness of the Patient Empowerment Programme (PEP) for type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care

This study evaluated the short‐term cost‐effectiveness of the Patient Empowerment Programme (PEP) for diabetes mellitus (DM) in Hong Kong. Propensity score matching was used to select a matched group of PEP and non‐PEP subjects. A societal perspective was adopted to estimate the cost of PEP. Outcome measures were the cumulative incidence of all‐cause mortality and diabetic complication over a 5‐year follow‐up period and the number needed to treat (NNT) to avoid 1 event. The incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER) of cost per event avoided was calculated using the PEP cost per subject multiplied by the NNT. The PEP cost per subject from the societal perspective was US$247. There was a significantly lower cumulative incidence of all‐cause mortality (2.9% vs 4.6%, P < .001), any DM complication (9.5% vs 10.8%, P = .001) and CVD events (6.8% vs 7.6%, P = .018), in the PEP group. The costs per death from any cause, DM complication or case of CVD avoided were US$14 465, US$19 617 and US$30 796, respectively. The extra amount allocated to managing PEP was small and it appears cost‐effective in the short‐term as an addition to RAMP.     

Direct medical costs for patients with type 2 diabetes in Sweden

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the total direct medical costs to society for patients with type 2 diabetes in Sweden and to investigate how different factors, for example diabetic late complications, affect costs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional data regarding health care utilization, clinical characteristics and quality of life, were collected at a single time-point. Data on resource use cover the 6-month period prior to this time point. SETTING: Patient recruitment and data collection were performed in nine primary care centres in three main regions in Sweden. SUBJECTS: Only patients with an age at diabetes diagnosis >/= 30 years (type 2 diabetes) were included (n = 777). RESULTS: The total annual direct medical costs for the Swedish diabetes type 2 population were estimated at about 7 billion SEK (Swedish Kronor) in 1998 prices, which is about 6% of the total health care expenditures and more than four times higher than the former Swedish estimate obtained when using diabetes as main diagnosis for calculating costs. The annual per patient cost was about 25 000 SEK. The largest share of this cost was hospital inpatient care. Costs increased with diabetes duration and were higher for patients treated with insulin compared to those treated with oral hypoglycaemic drugs or with life style modification only. Patients with both macro- and microvascular complications had more than three times higher costs compared with patients without such complications. CONCLUSIONS: Type 2 diabetes is a serious and expensive disease and the key to reducing costs seems to be intensive management and control in order to prevent and delay the associated late complications.     

Recent trends in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes and the association with abdominal obesity lead to growing health disparities in the USA: An analysis of the NHANES surveys from 1999 to 2014

Aim

To assess whether the secular trends in type 2 diabetes prevalence differ between abdominally obese and non‐obese individuals.

Methods

Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) were used to estimate the prevalence of type 2 diabetes and abdominal obesity among individuals aged ≥20 years in the USA from 1999/2000 to 2013/2014, after standardization to the age, sex and ethnicity population distribution estimates on January 1, 2014, as published by the US Census Bureau.

Results

The prevalence of abdominal obesity in the US population increased from 47.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 42.6‐52.2) in 1999/2000 to 57.2% (95% CI 55.9‐58.5) in 2013/2014. A significant increase was observed in all age groups: 20 to 44, 45 to 64, and ≥65 years. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes has also increased from 8.8% (95% CI 7.2‐10.4) in 1999/2000 to 11.7% (95% CI 10.9‐12.6) in 2013/2014, with no substantial change in trend over the recent years. However, the increase in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes was limited to individuals with abdominal obesity, and more specifically to individuals aged ≥45 years with abdominal obesity, with no significant change in prevalence in the non‐obese group and in individuals aged <45 years.

Conclusion

These findings highlight the critical importance of abdominal obesity—both as a likely key contributor to the continuing epidemic of type 2 diabetes in the USA and as a priority target for public health interventions.     

Management of type 2 diabetes: the current situation and key opportunities to improve care in the UK

In common with global trends, the number of individuals with type 2 diabetes in the UK is rising, driven largely by obesity. The increasing prevalence of younger individuals with type 2 diabetes is of particular concern because of the accelerated course of diabetes‐related complications that is observed in this population. The importance of good glycaemic control in the prevention of microvascular complications of diabetes is widely accepted, and there is a growing body of evidence to support a benefit in the reduction of cardiovascular events in the long term. Despite the importance of maintaining a healthy weight for the prevention of type 2 diabetes, the results from trials of lifestyle intervention strategies to reduce body weight have been disappointing. New glucose‐lowering agents offer some promise in this regard, offering an opportunity to combat the dual burden of hyperglycaemia and obesity simultaneously. The timing and appropriate choice of glucose‐lowering therapy has never been more complex as a result of rising prevalence of obesity in the young, concomitant obesity in some 90% of adults with type 2 diabetes and an ever‐increasing range of therapeutic options. The present review evaluates performance measures specific to weight and glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes in the UK using data from the Quality and Outcomes Framework in England and Wales, and the Scottish Diabetes Survey. Potential barriers to improvement in standards of care for people with type 2 diabetes are considered, including patient factors, clinical inertia and the difficulties in translating therapeutic guidelines into everyday clinical practice.     

Insulin use and increased risk of mortality in type 2 diabetes: a cohort study

Aim: To compare population‐based rates of all‐cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality in newly treated patients with type 2 diabetes according to levels of insulin exposure. Methods: Using the administrative databases of Saskatchewan Health, 12272 new users of oral antidiabetic therapy were identified between 1991 and 1996 and grouped according to cumulative insulin exposure based on total insulin dispensations per year: no exposure (reference group); low exposure (0 to <3); moderate exposure (3 to <12) and high exposure (≥12). Time‐varying multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the relationship between insulin exposure and all‐cause, CV‐related and non‐vascular mortality after adjustment for demographics, medications and comorbidities. Results: Average age was 65 (s.d. 13.9) years, 45% were female, and mean follow‐up was 5.1 (s.d. 2.2) years. In total, 1443 (12%) subjects started insulin, and 2681 (22%) deaths occurred. The highest mortality rates were in the high exposure group; 95 deaths/1000 person‐years compared with 40 deaths/1000 person‐years in the no exposure group [unadjusted hazard ratio (HR): 2.32; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.96–2.73]. After adjustment, we observed a graded risk of mortality associated with increasing exposure to insulin: low exposure [adjusted HR (aHR): 1.75; 95% CI: 1.24–2.47], moderate exposure (aHR: 2.18; 1.82–2.60) and high exposure (aHR: 2.79; 2.36–3.30); p = 0.005 for trend. Analyses restricted to CV‐related (p = 0.042 for trend) and non‐vascular (p = 0.004 for trend) mortality showed virtually identical results. Conclusions: We observed a significant and graded association between mortality risk and insulin exposure level in an inception cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes that persisted despite multivariable adjustment.     

Patterns of glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus initiating second‐line therapy after metformin monotherapy: Retrospective data for 10 256 individuals from the United Kingdom and Germany

Aim

To investigate determinants of change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) at 6 months after initiating uninterrupted second‐line glucose‐lowering therapies.

Materials and Methods

This cohort study utilized retrospective data from 10 256 patients with T2DM who initiated second‐line glucose‐lowering therapy (switch from or add‐on to metformin) between 2011 and 2014 in Germany and the UK. Effects of pre‐specified patient characteristics on 6‐month HbA1c changes were assessed using analysis of covariance.

Results

Patients had a mean (standard error [SE]) baseline HbA1c of 8.68% (0.02); 28.5% of patients discontinued metformin and switched to an alternative therapy and the remainder initiated add‐on therapy. Mean (SE) unadjusted 6‐month HbA1c change was ?1.27% (0.02). When adjusted for baseline HbA1c, 6‐month changes depended markedly on the magnitude of the baseline HbA1c (HbA1c <9%, ?0.45% per unit increase in HbA1c; HbA1c ≥9%, ?0.87% per unit increase in HbA1c). Adjusted mean 6‐month HbA1c reductions showed slight treatment differences (range, 0.92–1.09%; P < .001). Greater reductions in HbA1c were associated with second‐line treatment initiation within 6 months of T2DM diagnosis (1.36% vs 1.03% [P < .001]) and advanced age (≥70 years, 1.13%; <70 years, 1.02% [P < .001]).

Conclusions

Many patients with T2DM have very high HbA1c levels when initiating second‐line therapy, indicating the need for earlier treatment intensification. Patient‐specific factors merit consideration when making treatment decisions.     

Type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of developing urinary incontinence

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and development of urinary incontinence in women. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: The Nurses' Health Study cohort. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-one thousand eight hundred forty-five women who reported information on urinary function in 1996. MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported, physician-diagnosed DM was ascertained using questionnaire from 1976 to 1996 and confirmed using standard criteria. Self-reported urinary incontinence, defined as leakage at least weekly, was ascertained in 1996 and 2000. Logistic regression models were used to calculate multivariate-adjusted relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the relationship between DM (as of 1996) and prevalent and incident incontinence. RESULTS: The risk of prevalent incontinence (multivariate RR=1.28, 95% CI=1.18-1.39) and incident incontinence (multivariate RR=1.21, 95% CI=1.02-1.43) was significantly greater in women with DM than women without. Using a validated severity index, risk of developing severe incontinence was even more substantial in women with DM than in those without (multivariate RR=1.40, 95% CI=1.15-1.71 for leakage enough to wet the underwear; RR=1.97, 95% CI=1.24-3.12 for leakage enough to wet the outer clothing). In addition, risk of incontinence increased with duration of DM (P-trend=.03 for prevalent incontinence; P=.001 for incident incontinence). CONCLUSION: DM independently increases risk of urinary incontinence in women. Because risk of incontinence appeared associated with longer duration of DM, even delaying the onset of DM could have important public health implications.     

Patterns of self‐monitoring of blood glucose in insulin‐treated diabetes: analysis of a Scottish population over time

Analysis of a diabetes clinical information system in Tayside, Scotland, shows that a significant proportion of insulin‐treated patients with diabetes are not self‐monitoring blood glucose according to current clinical guidance and recommendations, with some not self‐monitoring their blood glucose at all. Although there has been an increase in the number of reagent strips dispensed over the past decade, this increase is mainly accounted for by increased testing frequency among people with diabetes already testing.