A 4‐gene expression score associated with high levels of Wilms Tumor‐1 (WT1) expression is an adverse prognostic factor in acute myeloid leukaemia

Wilms Tumor‐1 (WT1) expression level is implicated in the prognosis of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). We hypothesized that a gene expression profile associated with WT1 expression levels might be a good surrogate marker. We identified high WT1 gene sets by comparing the gene expression profiles in the highest and lowest quartiles of WT1 expression in two large AML studies. Two high WT1 gene sets were found to be highly correlated in terms of the altered genes and expression profiles. We identified a 17‐probe set signature of the high WT1 set as the optimal prognostic predictor in the first AML set, and showed that it was able to predict prognosis in the second AML series after adjustment for European LeukaemiaNet genetic groups. The gene signature also proved to be of prognostic value in a third AML series of 163 samples assessed by RNA sequencing, demonstrating its cross‐platform consistency . This led us to derive a 4‐gene expression score, which faithfully predicted adverse outcome. In conclusion, a short gene signature associated with high WT1 expression levels and the resultant 4‐gene expression score were found to be predictive of adverse prognosis in AML. This study provides new clues to the molecular pathways underlying high WT1 states in leukaemia.     

BAALC and WT1 expressions from diagnosis to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: consecutive monitoring in adult patients with core‐binding‐factor‐positive AML

No consecutive analysis of BAALC and WT1 expressions associated with core‐binding factor AML (CBF‐AML) from diagnosis to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has yet been reported. We investigated BAALC and WT1 expressions using a method of real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ‐PCR) at diagnosis, after induction chemotherapy, at pre‐HSCT, and at post‐HSCT period in 45 consecutive patients [t(8,21) (n = 28), inv(16) (n = 17)], who received HSCT as a post‐remission treatment. BAALC and WT1 RQ‐PCR decrement ratio (DR) was also calculated at post‐induction chemotherapy, at pre‐HSCT, and at post‐HSCT compared with the diagnostic level. Higher BAALC expression at diagnosis showed significantly inferior OS (P = 0.031), EFS (P = 0.011), and higher CIR (P = 0.002) rates. At post‐HSCT, both higher BAALC and WT1 expressions showed significantly inferior OS (P = 0.005, 0.016), EFS (P = 0.002, 0.006), and higher CIR (P = 0.001, 0.003) rates. A subgroup of t(8;21) showing higher BAALC and WT1 expressions at post‐HSCT were also associated with inferior OS (P = 0.018, 0.015) and higher CIR rates (P = 0.019, 0.011). While BAALC DR showed no significant results on outcomes, WT1 DR more than 2‐log at post‐HSCT showed significantly lower CIR rate (P = 0.028). This study showed that higher post‐HSCT BAALC and WT1 expressions in patients with CBF‐AML may be good markers of minimal residual disease for the prediction of survival and relapse after HSCT.     

Chronic liraglutide therapy induces an enhanced endogenous glucagon‐like peptide‐1 secretory response in early type 2 diabetes

Sustained exogenous stimulation of a hormone‐specific receptor can affect endogenous hormonal regulation. In this context, little is known about the impact of chronic treatment with glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) agonists on the endogenous GLP‐1 response. We therefore evaluated the impact of chronic liraglutide therapy on endogenous GLP‐1 and glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) response to an oral glucose challenge. A total of 51 people with type 2 diabetes of 2.6 ± 1.9 years’ duration were randomized to daily subcutaneous liraglutide or placebo injection and followed for 48 weeks, with an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) every 12 weeks. GLP‐1 and GIP responses were assessed according to their respective area under the curve (AUC) from measurements taken at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes during each OGTT. There were no differences in AUC_GIP between the groups. By contrast, although fasting GLP‐1 was unaffected, the liraglutide arm had ~2‐fold higher AUC_{GLP ‐1} at 12 weeks ( P < .001), 24 weeks ( P < .001), 36 weeks ( P = .03) and 48 weeks ( P = .03), as compared with placebo. Thus, chronic liraglutide therapy induces a previously unrecognized, robust and durable enhancement of the endogenous GLP‐1 response, highlighting the need for further study of the long‐term effects of incretin mimetics on L‐cell physiology.     

Effect of once‐weekly dulaglutide on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting blood glucose in patient subpopulations by gender,duration of diabetes and baseline HbA1c

Aims

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dulaglutide 1.5 and 0.75 mg in patients with type 2 diabetes by subgroups of gender, duration of diabetes and baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in the dulaglutide clinical development programme (AWARD‐1 to ‐6 and ‐8 clinical trials).

Methods

Change in HbA1c was analysed by gender, duration of diabetes (<5, ≥5 years and <10, ≥10 years), and baseline HbA1c (<8.5%, ≥8.5%) in pooled and individual studies. Changes from baseline in weight, hypoglycaemia and gastrointestinal adverse events were evaluated for individual trials.

Results

In the pooled analysis of patients treated with dulaglutide 1.5 mg at 6 months, the reductions in HbA1c from baseline were similar across gender (men: least squares [LS] mean ?1.26% [95% confidence interval {CI} ?1.36, ?1.16]; women: LS mean ?1.33% [95% CI ?1.43, ?1.24]) and among duration of diabetes subgroups (<5 years: LS mean ?1.32% [95% CI ?1.43, ?1.22]; ≥5 and <10 years: LS mean ?1.33% [95% CI ?1.43, ?1.22]; ≥10 years: ?1.24% [95% CI ?1.35, ?1.14]). Patients with baseline HbA1c ≥8.5% had greater HbA1c reductions than patients with baseline HbA1c <8.5%, (≥8.5%: LS mean ?1.86% [95% CI ?1.97, ?1.75]; <8.5%: LS mean ?1.02% [95% CI ?1.12, ?0.93]). Reductions in fasting blood glucose (FBG) were consistent with HbA1c changes. Similar results were observed with dulaglutide 0.75 mg. In general, body weight changes were similar among duration of diabetes and in baseline HbA1c subgroups, respectively; women had a numerically greater weight loss or less weight gain than men with both dulaglutide doses. There was no clinically meaningful difference in hypoglycaemia trends by gender or duration of diabetes. Hypoglycaemia incidence and rate were generally lower in patients with baseline HbA1c ≥8.5% than in those with <8.5%, except for the AWARD‐4 study (combination with mealtime insulin).

Conclusions

Across the AWARD studies, dulaglutide demonstrated significant improvements in glycaemic control irrespective of gender, duration of diabetes, or baseline HbA1c, with greater HbA1c and FBG reductions in patients with a higher baseline HbA1c. Dulaglutide was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to other glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists.     

Identification and comparison of insulin pharmacokinetics injected with a new 4‐mm needle vs 6‐ and 8‐mm needles accounting for endogenous insulin and C‐peptide secretion kinetics in non‐diabetic adult males

Aims/Introduction

Many patients with diabetes now use 5‐, 6‐ or 8‐mm needles for insulin injection. However, it is unclear whether needle length, particularly for shorter needles, affects the pharmacokinetic properties of insulin.

Materials and Methods

This was a three‐way, randomized, cross‐over, single‐center study involving 12 healthy Japanese adult males (age 27.4 ± 4.14 years; weight 64.2 ± 5.2 kg; body fat percentage 18.2 ± 1.5%). Participants received a subcutaneous (abdomen) dose of insulin lispro (1.5 U for participants weighing 55 to <65.0 kg; 2.0 U for participants weighing 65.0 to <80.0 kg) delivered using a 32‐G × 4 mm (32G × 4), 31‐G × 8 mm (31G × 8) or 32‐G × 6 mm (32G × 6) needle with a 3–7‐day washout between doses. Pharmacokinetic parameters of exogenous insulin were identified using non‐linear least squares, where the total insulin concentration was fit to the measured plasma insulin concentration using an overall combined model that accounted for C‐peptide/insulin secretion in addition to the injected dose.

Results

Maximum concentration and area under the curve for 0 to infinity min for insulin were bioequivalent for the 32G × 4 needle relative to the 32G × 6 and the 31G × 8 needles. The time to the maximum insulin concentration was bioequivalent for the 32G × 4 needle relative to the 32G × 6 needle, but not the 31G × 8 needle.

Conclusions

The use of 4‐mm needles is unlikely to change the pharmacokinetic properties of insulin when injected subcutaneously in adults. This trial was registered with UMIN‐CTR (no. UMIN000004469).