Plasma gastric inhibitory polypeptide and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 levels after glucose loading are associated with different factors in Japanese subjects

Aims/Introduction: Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) are major incretins that potentiate insulin secretion from pancreatic β‐cells. The factors responsible for incretin secretion have been reported in Caucasian subjects, but have not been thoroughly evaluated in Japanese subjects. We evaluated the factors associated with incretin secretion during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in Japanese subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT). Materials and Methods: We measured plasma GIP and GLP‐1 levels during OGTT in 17 Japanese NGT subjects and evaluated the factors associated with GIP and GLP‐1 secretion using simple and multiple regression analyses. Results: GIP secretion (AUC‐GIP) was positively associated with body mass index (P < 0.05), and area under the curve (AUC) of C‐peptide (P < 0.05) and glucagon (P < 0.01), whereas GLP‐1 secretion (AUC‐GLP‐1) was negatively associated with AUC of plasma glucose (P < 0.05). The insulinogenic index was most strongly associated with GIP secretion (P < 0.05); homeostasis model assessment β‐cell was the most the strongly associated factor in GLP‐1 secretion (P < 0.05) among the four indices of insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity. Conclusions: Several distinct factors might be associated with GIP and GLP‐1 secretion during OGTT in Japanese subjects. (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040‐1124.2010.00078.x, 2011)     

Biological and functional characteristics of a novel low-molecular weight antagonist of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor, SKL-14959, in vitro and in vivo

Aim: We recently discovered a glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor antagonist, SKL‐14959. GIP plays a role in the glucose and lipid metabolism, and is associated with obesity and insulin resistance. Therefore, we aimed to ascertain the inhibitory potency and glucose and lipid metabolism of SKL‐14959. Methods: SKL‐14959 was evaluated for its binding affinity to each GIP, glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) and glucagon receptors by each labelled and non‐labelled ligand; GIP‐stimulated cyclic AMP (cAMP) production in CHO cells expressing human GIP receptor in vitro. Oral and intraperitoneal glucose tolerance tests (OGTT and IPGTT) were performed to examine the insulinotropic effect on endogenous and exogenous GIP. Oil tolerance tests were also conducted to examine the lipid metabolism and the postheparin plasma lipase activity, lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and hepatic lipase (HL). Result: SKL‐14959 selectively bound to GIP receptor and inhibited GIP‐stimulated cAMP production with the Ki value of 55 nM and an IC₅₀ value of 2.9 µM, respectively. SKL‐14959·Na significantly increased blood glucose levels, inhibited insulin secretion in OGTT and inhibited the plasma glucose lowering of exogenous GIP in IPGTT. Furthermore, SKL‐14959 increased plasma triacylglycerol (TG) levels as well as suppressed the postheparin plasma lipase activity in an oil load test. Conclusion: These data indicate that SKL‐14959 is distinguished in the physiological phenotype of GIP following direct binding to the receptor.     

Dual modulation of GIP and glucagon action by the low molecular weight compound 4-hydroxybenzoic acid 2-bromobenzylidene hydrazide

Aim: The presence of functional gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) receptors on adipocytes and knowledge that GIP plays a key role in fat deposition suggests a beneficial effect of GIP receptor antagonism in obesity and insulin resistance. GIP receptor antagonists studied to date are peptidic GIP analogues that must be administered by injection. Methods: The present study has examined in vitro and in vivo metabolic actions of a low molecular weight GIP receptor modulator 4‐hydroxybenzoic acid 2‐bromobenzylidene hydrazide (4H2BH), suitable for oral administration. Results: 4H2BH alone had no significant effect on cAMP production or insulin secretion from BRIN‐BD11 cells. However, 4H2BH significantly inhibited GIP‐mediated cAMP production and insulin secretion in vitro. 4H2BH also suppressed (p < 0.05 to p < 0.001) glucagon‐induced elevations of cAMP generation and insulin secretion in BRIN‐BD11 cells. However, 4H2BH had no effect on glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) mediated insulinotropic actions. Administration of 4H2BH to mice in combination with glucose and GIP significantly annulled the glucose‐lowering actions of GIP. In agreement with this, 4H2BH completely annulled GIP‐mediated insulin secretion. Combined injection of 4H2BH with glucagon also partially (p < 0.05 to p < 0.001) impaired glucagon‐induced elevations in blood glucose and plasma insulin. 4H2BH had no effect on blood glucose or insulin levels when administered alone. Conclusion: These results indicate that 4H2BH has a dual effect of inhibiting GIP and glucagon‐mediated biological actions. Given that hyperglucagonaemia is also a cardinal feature of type 2 diabetes, 4H2BH and related low molecular weight compounds appear worthy of further evaluation for therapeutic potential in obesity diabetes.     

Insulin‐secretion capacity in normal glucose tolerance,impaired glucose tolerance,and diabetes in obese and non‐obese Japanese patients

Aims/Introduction: Pronounced reduction of insulin secretion in response to a rise in glucose level has been reported in Japanese patients compared with Caucasian patients, but the mean body mass index (BMI) is also lower in Japanese patients. As BMI is a determinant of insulin secretion, we examined insulin‐secretion capacity in obese and non‐obese Japanese patients. Materials and Methods: Using the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), we estimated the insulin‐secreting capacity in obese (BMI ≥ 25) and non‐obese (BMI < 25) Japanese patients, including 1848 patients with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), 321 patients with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and 69 diabetes (DM) patients. Results: The insulinogenic index (I.I.), calculated by dividing the increment in serum insulin by the increment in plasma glucose from 0 to 30 min during OGTT, decreased from NGT to IGT and to DM in patients with and without obesity. In patients with NGT, IGT and DM, the I.I. values of obese patients were higher than those of the non‐obese patients. The peak of insulin concentration in OGTT appeared at 60 min in NGT and at 120 min in IGT in both obese and non‐obese patients, but in DM it was observed at 120 min in obese patients and at 60 min in non‐obese patients. Conclusions: These results show that early‐phase insulin secretion in obese Japanese patients is higher than in non‐obese patients in all stages of glucose tolerance, and delayed insulin‐secretion capacity is also conserved in obese Japanese patients, even in IGT and DM, which is similar to Caucasian patients. (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040‐1124.2011.00180.x , 2011)     

Ingestion of a moderate high‐sucrose diet results in glucose intolerance with reduced liver glucokinase activity and impaired glucagon‐like peptide‐1 secretion

Aims/Introduction: Excessive intake of sucrose can cause severe health issues, such as diabetes mellitus. In animal studies, consumption of a high‐sucrose diet (SUC) has been shown to cause obesity, insulin resistance and glucose intolerance. However, several in vivo experiments have been carried out using diets with much higher sucrose contents (50–70% of the total calories) than are typically ingested by humans. In the present study, we examined the effects of a moderate SUC on glucose metabolism and the underlying mechanism. Materials and Methods: C57BL/6J mice received a SUC (38.5% sucrose), a high‐starch diet (ST) or a control diet for 5 weeks. We assessed glucose tolerance, incretin secretion and liver glucose metabolism. Results: An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) showed that plasma glucose levels in the early phase were significantly higher in SUC‐fed mice than in ST‐fed or control mice, with no change in plasma insulin levels at any stage. SUC‐fed mice showed a significant improvement in insulin sensitivity. Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) secretion 15 min after oral glucose administration was significantly lower in SUC‐fed mice than in ST‐fed or control mice. Hepatic glucokinase (GCK) activity was significantly reduced in SUC‐fed mice. During the OGTT, the accumulation of glycogen in the liver was suppressed in SUC‐fed mice in a time‐dependent manner. Conclusions: These results indicate that mice that consume a moderate SUC show glucose intolerance with a reduction in hepatic GCK activity and impairment in GLP‐1 secretion. (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040‐1124.2012.00208.x , 2012)     

Evaluation of proposed oral disposition index measures in relation to the actual disposition index

Aims While the disposition index provides a useful measure of B‐cell function, its calculation requires the performance of a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIVGTT). Recently, the demonstration of a hyperbolic relationship between indices of insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity derived from the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) has led to the introduction of two novel OGTT‐based measures of B‐cell function analogous to the disposition index: (i) the insulin secretion‐sensitivity index‐2 (ISSI‐2) (defined as the ratio of the area‐under‐the‐insulin‐curve to the area‐under‐the‐glucose curve, multiplied by the Matsuda index) and (ii) insulinogenic index (IGI)/fasting insulin. However, neither of these two measures has been directly compared with the disposition index. Methods Two hundred and thirteen non‐diabetic children (122 boys, 91 girls) underwent both OGTT and FSIVGTT, allowing for the calculation of ISSI‐2, IGI/fasting insulin and the disposition index. Results ISS1‐2 and IGI/fasting insulin were strongly correlated with each other (r = 0.82, P < 0.0001). Both measures correlated with the disposition index, with ISSI‐2 showing a modestly stronger association (ISSI‐2: r = 0.24, P = 0.0003; IGI/fasting insulin: r = 0.21, P = 0.0022). Standardized linear regression analyses confirmed that the relationship between log ISSI‐2 and the disposition index (standardized regression coefficient = 0.224, P = 0.001) was stronger than that between log IGI/fasting insulin and the disposition index (standardized regression coefficient = 0.166, P = 0.015). Conclusions The OGTT‐derived measures ISSI‐2 and IGI/fasting insulin exhibit modest correlations with the disposition index. These relationships require further assessment in other patient populations.     

Effects of glucose and meal ingestion on incretin secretion in Japanese subjects with normal glucose tolerance

Aims/Introduction: Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) are the major incretins; their secretion after various nutrient loads are well‐evaluated in Caucasians. However, little is known of the relationship between incretin secretion and differing nutritional loading in Japanese subjects. In the present study, we evaluated GIP and GLP‐1 secretion in Japanese subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) after glucose loading (75 g glucose and 17 g glucose) and meal ingestion. Materials and Methods: A total of 10 Japanese NGT subjects participated in 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), 17 g OGTT and meal tolerance test (MTT). Plasma glucose (PG), serum insulin (IRI), serum C‐peptide (CPR), plasma total GIP, and plasma total GLP‐1 levels during OGTT and MTT were determined. Results: Area under the curve (AUC)‐GIP was increased in proportion to the amount of glucose, and was highest in MTT, showing that GIP secretion is also stimulated by nutrients other than glucose, such as lipid. In contrast, although the larger glucose load tended to induce a larger GLP‐1 release, AUC‐GLP‐1 was not significantly different among the three loading tests (75 g OGTT, 17 g OGTT, MTT) irrespective of the kind or amount of nutrition load. Conclusions: Our results suggest that nutritional composition might have a greater effect on GIP secretion than that on GLP‐1 secretion in Japanese NGT subjects . (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040‐1124.2011.00143.x, 2012)     

Diabetes and obesity treatment based on dual incretin receptor activation: ‘twincretins’

The gut incretin hormones glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) are secreted after meal ingestion and work in concert to promote postprandial insulin secretion and regulate glucagon secretion. GLP‐1 also slows gastric emptying and suppresses appetite, whereas GIP seems to affect lipid metabolism. The introduction of selective GLP‐1 receptor (GLP‐1R) agonists for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity has increased the scientific and clinical interest in incretins. Combining the body weight‐lowering and glucose‐lowering effects of GLP‐1 with a more potent improvement of β cell function through additional GIP action could potentially offer a more effective treatment of diabetes and obesity, with fewer adverse effects than selective GLP‐1R agonists; therefore, new drugs designed to co‐activate both the GIP receptor (GIPR) and the GLP‐1R simultaneously are under development. In the present review, we address advances in the field of GIPR and GLP‐1R co‐agonism and review in vitro studies, animal studies and human trials involving co‐administration of the two incretins, as well as results from a recently developed GIPR/GLP‐1R co‐agonist, and highlight promising areas and challenges within the field of incretin dual agonists.     

Weight loss and incretin responsiveness improve glucose control independently after gastric bypass surgery

Background: The aim of the present study was to determine the mechanisms underlying Type 2 diabetes remission after gastric bypass (GBP) surgery by characterizing the short‐ and long‐term changes in hormonal determinants of blood glucose. Methods: Eleven morbidly obese women with diabetes were studied before and 1, 6, and 12 months after GBP; eight non‐diabetic morbidly obese women were used as controls. The incretin effect was measured as the difference in insulin levels in response to oral glucose and to an isoglycemic intravenous challenge. Outcome measures were glucose, insulin, C‐peptide, proinsulin, amylin, glucagon, glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) levels and the incretin effect on insulin secretion. Results: The decrease in fasting glucose (r = 0.724) and insulin (r = 0.576) was associated with weight loss up to 12 months after GBP. In contrast, the blunted incretin effect (calculated at 22%) that improved at 1 month remained unchanged with further weight loss at 6 (52%) and 12 (52%) months. The blunted incretin (GLP‐1 and GIP) levels, early phase insulin secretion, and other parameters of β‐cell function (amylin, proinsulin/insulin) followed the same pattern, with rapid improvement at 1 month that remained unchanged at 1 year. Conclusions: The data suggest that weight loss and incretins may contribute independently to improved glucose levels in the first year after GBP surgery.     

Active immunization against (Pro3)GIP improves metabolic status in high‐fat‐fed mice

Aim: Ablation of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) receptor signalling can prevent many of the metabolic abnormalities associated with dietary‐induced obesity‐diabetes. The present study was designed to assess the ability of active immunization against (Pro³)GIP to counter metabolic dysfunction associated with diet‐induced obesity in high‐fat‐fed mice. Methods: Normal male Swiss NIH mice were injected (s.c.) once every 14 days for 98 days with complexed (Pro³)GIP peptide, with transfer to a high‐fat diet on day 21. Results: Active immunization against (Pro³)GIP resulted in circulating GIP antibody production and significantly (p < 0.05 p < 0.01) reduced circulating blood glucose concentrations compared to high‐fat control mice from day 84 onwards. Glucose levels were not significantly different from lean controls. The glycaemic response to i.p. glucose was correspondingly improved (p < 0.01) in (Pro³)GIP‐immunized mice. Furthermore, circulating and glucose‐stimulated plasma insulin levels were significantly (p < 0.01 to p < 0.001) depressed compared to high‐fat control mice. Liver triglyceride, pancreatic insulin and circulating LDL‐cholesterol levels were also significantly reduced in (Pro³)GIP‐immunized mice. These changes were independent of any effects on food intake or body weight. The glucose‐lowering effect of native GIP was annulled in (Pro³)GIP‐immunized mice consistent with the induction of biologically effective GIP‐specific neutralizing antibodies. Conclusion: These results suggest that immunoneutralization of GIP represents an effective means of countering the disruption of metabolic processes induced by high‐fat feeding.     

Comparing hormonal and symptomatic responses to experimental hypoglycaemia in insulin‐ and sulphonylurea‐treated Type 2 diabetes

Aims Patients with diabetes rely on symptoms to identify hypoglycaemia. Previous data suggest patients with Type 2 diabetes develop greater symptomatic and hormonal responses to hypoglycaemia at higher glucose concentrations than non‐diabetic controls and these responses are lowered by insulin treatment. It is unclear if this is as a result of insulin therapy itself or improved glucose control. We compared physiological responses to hypoglycaemia in patients with Type 2 diabetes patients treated with sulphonylureas (SUs) or insulin (INS) with non‐diabetic controls (CON). Methods Stepped hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemic clamps were performed on 20 subjects with Type 2 diabetes, 10 SU‐treated and 10 treated with twice‐daily premixed insulin, and 10 age‐ and weight‐matched non‐diabetic controls. Diabetic subjects were matched for diabetes duration, glycated haemoglobin (HbA_1c) and hypoglycaemia experience. We measured symptoms, counterregulatory hormones and cognitive function at glucose plateaux of 5, 4, 3.5, 3 and 2.5 mmol/l. Results Symptomatic responses to hypoglycaemia occurred at higher blood glucose concentrations in SU‐treated than INS‐treated patients [3.5 (0.4) vs. 2.6 (0.5) mmol/l SU vs. INS; P = 0.001] or controls [SU vs. CON 3.5 (0.4) vs. 3.0 (0.6) mmol/l; P = 0.05]. They also had a greater increase in symptom scores at hypoglycaemia [13.6 (11.3) vs. 3.6 (6.1) vs. 5.1 (4.3) SU vs. INS vs. CON; P = 0.017]. There were no significant differences in counterregulatory hormone responses or impairment of cognitive function among groups. Conclusions Sulphonylurea‐treated subjects are more symptomatic of hypoglycaemia at a higher glucose level than insulin‐treated subjects. This may protect them from severe hypoglycaemia but hinder attainment of glycaemic goals.     

Secretion of incretin hormones and the insulinotropic effect of gastric inhibitory polypeptide in women with a history of gestational diabetes

Aims/hypothesis The insulinotropic effect of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) is reduced in patients with type 2 diabetes and around 50% of their first-degree relatives under hyperglycaemic conditions. It is unknown whether this is a result of a specific defect in GIP action or of a general reduction in beta cell function. Moreover, impaired secretion of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) has been described in patients with type 2 diabetes. Therefore, we studied the insulinotropic effect of GIP in women with previous gestational diabetes (pGDM) under euglycaemic fasting conditions and during a hyperglycaemic clamp experiment. The secretion of GIP and GLP-1 was assessed following oral glucose ingestion.Materials and methods On separate occasions we performed an OGTT and administered an i.v. bolus of 20 pmol GIP/kg body weight in 20 women with pGDM and 20 control women. An additional hyperglycaemic clamp experiment (140 mg/dl [7.8 mmol/l] over 120 min) with i.v. infusion of GIP (2 pmol kg^–1 min^–1; 30–90 min) was performed in 14 women in each group. Capillary and venous blood samples were drawn for the measurement of glucose (glucose oxidase), insulin, C-peptide, GIP and GLP-1 (specific immunoassays). Indices of insulin sensitivity and beta cell function were calculated. Statistical analyses were carried out using repeated measures ANOVA.Results Following oral glucose ingestion, plasma glucose, insulin and C-peptide concentrations increased to higher levels in the women with pGDM than in the control women (p<0.05). The women with pGDM were characterised by a higher degree of insulin resistance than the control women (p=0.007 for the Matsuda index), but showed no overt defects in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (p=0.40 for the insulinogenic index following i.v. glucose). The secretion of GLP-1 and GIP was not different between the groups (p=0.87 and p=0.57, respectively). The insulin secretory response to GIP administration was similar in the two groups both after GIP bolus administration and during the hyperglycaemic clamp experiment (p=0.99 and p=0.88, respectively). A hyperbola-like relationship was found between the degree of insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index) and the insulin secretory response to GIP and i.v. glucose administration.Conclusions/interpretation These results do not support the hypothesis of an early defect in GIP action as a risk factor for subsequent development of diabetes in women with previous gestational diabetes. The inverse relationship between insulin resistance and the insulin secretory response to glucose or GIP suggests that beta cell secretory function in response to different stimuli increases adaptively when insulin sensitivity is diminished.     

Glucose‐dependent insulinotropic peptide secretion is induced by inflammatory stimuli in an interleukin‐1‐dependent manner in mice

Recently, glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) levels have been found to be increased in response to inflammatory stimuli, leading to insulin secretion and prevention of hyperglycaemia during endotoxemia in mice. In the present study, we assess the relevance of the other incretin hormone, glucose‐dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), as a regulator of glucose metabolism under inflammatory conditions. We found that lipopolysaccharide (LPS) increased GIP secretion in a time‐ and dose‐dependent manner in C57BL/6J mice. To elucidate the underlying mechanisms, mice were injected with inflammatory cytokines known to be released by LPS. Circulating GIP levels significantly increased in response to interleukin (IL)‐1β but not IL‐6 or tumour necrosis factor (TNF)‐α administration. Using respective knockout mice we found that LPS‐mediated GIP secretion was selectively dependent on IL‐1 signalling. To evaluate the functional relevance of inflammatory GIP secretion we pretreated mice with the GIP‐receptor antagonist (Pro3)GIP. This blunted LPS‐induced TNF‐α and IL‐6 secretion but did not affect LPS‐induced insulin secretion or blood glucose‐lowering. In conclusion, GIP provides a novel link between the immune system and the gut, with proinflammatory‐immune modulatory function but minor glucose regulatory relevance in the context of acute endotoxemia.     

Glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide: from pathophysiology to therapeutic opportunities in obesity‐associated disorders

Glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is a hormone secreted from the intestinal K‐cells with established insulin‐releasing actions. However, the GIP receptor is widely distributed in peripheral organs, including the adipose tissue, gut, bone and brain, where GIP modulates energy intake, cell metabolism and proliferation, and lipid and glucose metabolism, eventually promoting lipid and glucose storage. In diabetes and obesity, the incretin effect of GIP is blunted, while the extrapancreatic tissues keep a normal sensitivity to this hormone. As GIP levels are normal or elevated in obesity and diabetes, mounting evidence from chemical or genetic GIP deletion in animal models of obesity‐related diabetes suggests that GIP may have a pro‐obesogenic action and that a strategy antagonizing GIP action may be beneficial in these conditions, clearing triglyceride deposits from adipose tissue, liver and muscle, and restoring normal insulin sensitivity. Emerging evidence also suggests that the metabolic benefits of bypass surgery are mediated, at least in part, by surgical removal of GIP‐secreting K‐cells in the upper small intestine.     

The response of Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide (GIP) and insulin to glucose in duodenal ulcer patients

Summary The response of Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide (GIP) and insulin to a 50 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and an intravenous glucose infusion (IVGI), which copied the changes in plasma glucose concentrations during the OGTT, were measured in 10 patients with duodenal ulcer and in 10 healthy control subjects. The mean responses of GIP and insulin to OGTT were significantly increased in the ulcer patients. During IVGI the responses were normal. The degree of increased GIP response in the patients was positively correlated with the plasma glucose increase during the OGTT. It is postulated that the increased GIP secretion is related to a faster glucose absorption due to rapid gastric emptying in duodenal ulcer patients. No correlation was found between basal and peak gastric acid output and the GIP response in the patients. The data demonstrate that GIP secretion is not defective in duodenal ulcer patients.     

Insulin sensitivity, insulin release and glucagon-like peptide-1 levels in persons with impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance in the EUGENE2 study

Aims/hypothesis We examined the phenotype of individuals with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and/or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) with regard to insulin release and insulin resistance. Methods Non-diabetic offspring (n = 874; mean age 40 ± 10.4 years; BMI 26.6 ± 4.9 kg/m²) of type 2 diabetic patients from five different European Centres (Denmark, Finland, Germany, Italy and Sweden) were examined with regard to insulin sensitivity (euglycaemic clamps), insulin release (IVGTT) and glucose tolerance (OGTT). The levels of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) were measured during the OGTT in 278 individuals. Results Normal glucose tolerance was found in 634 participants, while 110 had isolated IFG, 86 had isolated IGT and 44 had both IFG and IGT, i.e. about 28% had a form of reduced glucose tolerance. Participants with isolated IFG had lower glucose-corrected first-phase (0–10 min) and higher second-phase insulin release (10–60 min) during the IVGTT, while insulin sensitivity was reduced in all groups with abnormal glucose tolerance. Similarly, GLP-1 but not GIP levels were reduced in individuals with abnormal glucose tolerance. Conclusions/interpretation The primary mechanism leading to hyperglycaemia in participants with isolated IFG is likely to be impaired basal and first-phase insulin secretion, whereas in isolated IGT the primary mechanism leading to postglucose load hyperglycaemia is insulin resistance. Reduced GLP-1 levels were seen in all groups with abnormal glucose tolerance and were unrelated to the insulin release pattern during an IVGTT.     

GH-binding protein in obese men with varying glucose tolerance: relationship to body fat distribution, insulin secretion and the GH-IGF-I axis

Bioelectrical impedance for measurement of total body fat and computed tomography for visceral and subcutaneous fat at umbilicus levels were performed in 34 obese and 10 lean men. Insulin secretion in response to an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and a GH stimulation test by L-dopa, growth hormone-binding protein (GHBP) and IGF-I were measured. Obese subjects were divided into three groups according to the OGTT. The obese type II diabetes mellitus group had the highest GHBP levels and the most visceral fat. GHBP levels were most strongly correlated with the ratio of visceral fat area to body weight (VWR) above any other parameters (r = 0.725, P<0.001). The insulin and free fatty acid (FFA) areas under curves (AUC) during the OGTT, and the IGF-I level, were also positively correlated with GHBP levels (r = 0.474, P<0.005; r = 0.572, P<0.005; r = 0.453. P<0.005). GH-AUC to the L-dopa stimulation test was negatively correlated with GHBP levels (r = -0.432. P<0.005). Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis showed that VWR, FFA-AUC and insulin-AUC significantly contributed to the variability of GHBP (r2 = 0.58). In conclusion, we demonstrated that: (i) visceral fat amount mainly determined GHBP levels in obese men with varying glucose tolerance: (ii) hyperglycemia per se did not influence the GHBP level, whereas insulin and FFA could play a role in regulation of GHBP: and (iii) although GH was not the main regulator of GHBP, the unchanged IGF-I level despite GH hyposecretion suggests that increased GHBP levels reflect GH hypersensitivity in order to compensate for decreased GH secretion in obesity.     

Twelve weeks treatment with the DPP‐4 inhibitor,sitagliptin, prevents degradation of peptide YY and improves glucose and non‐glucose induced insulin secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Aim: To examine the effects of 12 weeks of treatment with the DPP‐4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, on gastrointestinal hormone responses to a standardized mixed meal and beta cell secretory capacity, measured as glucose and non‐glucose induced insulin secretion during a hyperglycaemic clamp, in patients with type 2 diabetes. Method: A double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled study over 12 weeks in which 24 patients with T2DM were randomized to receive either sitagliptin (Januvia) 100 mg qd or placebo as an add‐on therapy to metformin. In week 0, 1 and 12 patients underwent a meal test and a 90‐min 20 mM hyperglycaemic clamp with 5 g of l ‐arginine infusion. Main outcome measure was postprandial total glucagon‐like peptide 1 (GLP‐1) concentration. Additional measures were insulin and C‐peptide, glycaemic control, intact and total peptide YY (PYY) and glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), and intact glucagon‐like peptide 2 (GLP‐2) and GLP‐1. Results: All patients [sitagliptin n = 12, age: 59.5 (39–64) years, HbA1c: 8.0 (7.3–10.0)%, BMI: 33.2 (29.3–39.4); placebo n = 12, age: 60 (31–72) years, HbA1c: 7.7 (7.1–9.8)%, BMI: 30.7 (25.7–40.5)] [median (range)] completed the trial. Sitagliptin treatment improved glycaemic control, had no effect on total GLP‐1, GIP or intact GLP‐2, but reduced total PYY and PYY_{3‐ 36}, and increased PYY_{1‐ 36} and intact incretin hormones. Sitagliptin improved first and second phases of beta cell secretion and maximal secretory capacity. All effects were achieved after 1 week. No significant changes occurred in the placebo group. Conclusion: The postprandial responses of total GLP‐1 and GIP and intact GLP‐2 were unaltered. PYY degradation was prevented. Glucose and non‐glucose induced beta cell secretion was improved. There was no difference in responses to sitagliptin between 1 and 12 weeks of treatment.     

Chronic liraglutide therapy induces an enhanced endogenous glucagon‐like peptide‐1 secretory response in early type 2 diabetes

Sustained exogenous stimulation of a hormone‐specific receptor can affect endogenous hormonal regulation. In this context, little is known about the impact of chronic treatment with glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) agonists on the endogenous GLP‐1 response. We therefore evaluated the impact of chronic liraglutide therapy on endogenous GLP‐1 and glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) response to an oral glucose challenge. A total of 51 people with type 2 diabetes of 2.6 ± 1.9 years’ duration were randomized to daily subcutaneous liraglutide or placebo injection and followed for 48 weeks, with an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) every 12 weeks. GLP‐1 and GIP responses were assessed according to their respective area under the curve (AUC) from measurements taken at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes during each OGTT. There were no differences in AUC_GIP between the groups. By contrast, although fasting GLP‐1 was unaffected, the liraglutide arm had ~2‐fold higher AUC_{GLP ‐1} at 12 weeks ( P < .001), 24 weeks ( P < .001), 36 weeks ( P = .03) and 48 weeks ( P = .03), as compared with placebo. Thus, chronic liraglutide therapy induces a previously unrecognized, robust and durable enhancement of the endogenous GLP‐1 response, highlighting the need for further study of the long‐term effects of incretin mimetics on L‐cell physiology.