Concomitant treatment with nebulized formoterol and tiotropium in subjects with COPD: a placebo-controlled trial

Adding a long-acting beta(2)-agonist (LABA) by dry powder inhaler (DPI) to tiotropium provides significantly increased and sustained bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients over either product alone. To demonstrate similar benefits with a nebulized LABA, a placebo-controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of formoterol fumarate inhalation solution in subjects receiving tiotropium as a maintenance treatment for COPD. After a 7-14-day screening period using tiotropium 18 microg once daily, subjects with diagnosed COPD (> or = 25% to <65% predicted FEV(1)) were randomized to receive 20 microg formoterol fumarate inhalation solution twice daily for nebulization plus tiotropium (FFIS/TIO) or nebulized placebo twice daily plus tiotropium (PLA/TIO) for 6 weeks. Efficacy was assessed with spirometry at each visit (Day 1, Week 1, 3, 6), the transition dyspnea index (TDI), and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Baseline characteristics were comparable, including mean FEV(1)% predicted. At Week 6, FEV(1) AUC(0-3) was 1.52 L for FFIS/TIO-treated subjects vs. 1.34 L for PLA/TIO-treated subjects (p<0.0001). The mean TDI scores in the FFIS/TIO and PLA/TIO groups were 2.30 and 0.16, respectively (p=0.0002). SGRQ did not change significantly with 6 weeks treatment, with the exception of FFIS/TIO improvements in symptom score vs. PLA/TIO (p=0.04). More PLA/TIO- than FFIS/TIO-treated subjects experienced AEs (39.7% vs. 22.9%), COPD exacerbations (7.9% vs. 4.5%), and serious AEs (3.2% vs. 1.5%). Nebulized formoterol fumarate in combination with tiotropium provided statistically and clinically significant improvements in bronchodilation and symptom control over tiotropium alone and demonstrated good tolerability.     

Nebulized formoterol fumarate: Dose selection and pharmacokinetics

To determine a dose of nebulized formoterol fumarate inhalation solution (FFIS) comparable to that of the marketed formoterol fumarate dry powder inhaler (FA, 12mug), two crossover studies were conducted in subjects with COPD. Study 1 was a single-dose, double-blind, double-dummy dose-ranging study in which 47 subjects were randomly assigned to treatment sequences that evaluated the bronchodilatory effects of FFIS 2.5, 5, 10, 20, and 40mug, FA, and placebo over 12h. Mean FEV(1) AUC(0-12) following FFIS treatment ranged from 1.3 to 3.0l/h in a dose-related manner, with equivalent values (2.3l/h) for FFIS 20mug and FA. Results for other spirometric measures, including peak and trough FEV(1) and absolute change in FEV(1) by timepoint, confirmed the comparability of FFIS 20mug and FA. Study results with the nebulized formulation supported the rapid time to onset of bronchodilation with FFIS 20mug (3.9 and 2.2min imputed for 15% and 12%/200ml response, respectively). Study 2, a single-dose, open-label crossover study, was conducted to establish the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of nebulized formoterol and confirm comparability to FA. Thirteen subjects were randomly assigned to treatment sequences with FFIS 10, 20, and 244mug and FA with a 5-14-day washout period between each treatment. Formoterol levels were assessed from blood and urine collected pre-dose and over a 24-36-h period after dosing. Pharmacodynamic (PD) measures included clinical laboratory and ECG measures pre-dose and over a 24-h period post-dose. FFIS 244mug was rapidly absorbed with a T(max) of 12min and t(1/2) of 6.1h. Data from other doses were sporadic due to assay sensitivity. The mean amount excreted (Ae) in urine suggested linear kinetics and confirmed the comparability of FFIS 20mug and FA. Mean serum potassium decreased and mean serum glucose increased transiently in a dose-dependent manner following treatment. No clinically significant ECG changes were observed; mean heart rate increased after treatment with FFIS 244mug by up to 6bpm. Findings from dose-ranging and PK/PD studies confirmed that a 20mug dose of FFIS was comparable to formoterol fumarate delivered by dry powder inhalation (12mug) and established the dose proportionality and linear kinetics of formoterol fumarate delivered by nebulization.     

Formoterol: a review of its use in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Inhaled formoterol is a long-acting selective beta2-adrenoceptor agonist, with an onset of action of 5 minutes postdose and a bronchodilator effect that lasts for at least 12 hours. Statistically significant and clinically relevant (>120 ml) improvements in lung function [assessed using standardized/normalized area under the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) versus time curve (AUC FEV1)] were observed with inhaled formoterol 12 microg twice daily (the approved dosage in the US) compared with placebo in 12-week and 12-month, randomized, double-blind trials in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The bronchodilator efficacy of formoterol 12 microg twice daily was greater than that of oral slow-release theophylline (individualized dosages) in a 12-month trial or inhaled ipratropium bromide 40 microg four times daily in a 12-week trial. Improvement in AUC FEV1 with formoterol, but not theophylline, compared with placebo was observed in patients with irreversible or poorly-reversible airflow obstruction. Formoterol also significantly improved health-related quality of life compared with ipratropium bromide or placebo and significantly reduced symptoms compared with placebo. Combination therapy with formoterol 12 microg twice daily plus ipratropium bromide 40 microg four times daily was significantly more effective than albuterol (salbutamol) 200 microg four times daily plus the same dosage of ipratropium bromide in a 3-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover trial. Inhaled formoterol was well tolerated in clinical trials. The incidence of investigator-determined drug-related adverse events with inhaled formoterol 12 microg twice daily was similar to that with placebo and inhaled ipratropium bromide 40 microg four times daily but lower than that with oral slow-release theophylline (individualized dosages). Importantly, there were no significant differences between formoterol and placebo or comparator drugs in cardiovascular adverse events in patients with COPD and corrected QT interval values within the normal range. In conclusion, inhaled formoterol improved lung function and health-related quality of life and reduced symptoms relative to placebo in clinical trials in patients with COPD. The drug had greater bronchodilator efficacy than oral slow-release theophylline or inhaled ipratropium bromide and showed efficacy in combination with ipratropium bromide. The adverse events profile (including cardiovascular adverse events) with formoterol was similar to that with placebo. Thus, inhaled formoterol may be considered as a first-line option for the management of bronchoconstriction in patients with COPD who require regular bronchodilator therapy for the management of symptoms.     

A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study comparing arformoterol tartrate inhalation solution and racemic formoterol dry powder inhaler in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND: Arformoterol is a single-isomer (R,R-formoterol) nebulized long-acting beta(2)-agonist approved for use in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Exposure (plasma concentrations of (R,R)-formoterol) and forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)) were compared for 15 microg nebulized arformoterol and 12 and 24 microg racemic formoterol (containing 6 and 12 microg (R,R)-formoterol, respectively) delivered by dry powder inhaler (DPI). METHODS: An open-label, randomized, three-way crossover study in 39 subjects with COPD (FEV(1) 1.4L, 44.4% predicted). Twice-daily treatments included nebulized arformoterol (15 microg) and racemic formoterol DPI (12 and 24 microg) for 14 days. Plasma concentrations of (R,R)- and (S,S)-formoterol were determined on days 1 and 14 of each treatment period. Airway function efficacy endpoints included the percent change in trough FEV(1) from baseline on day 14 of each treatment period. RESULTS: At steady state, exposure to (R,R)-formoterol was similar following nebulized 15 microg arformoterol (C(max): 6.5 pg/mL; AUC(0-tau): 56.5 pgh/mL) and 12 microg racemic formoterol DPI (C(max): 6.2 pg/mL; AUC((0-)(tau)()): 46.3 pgh/mL). The geometric mean ratios between these two treatments (90% confidence intervals) for C(max) and AUC((0-)(tau)()) were 0.91 (0.76, 1.09) and 1.16 (1.00, 1.35), respectively. Treatment with 24 microg racemic formoterol DPI resulted in dose proportionally higher (R,R)-formoterol: C(max) (10.8 pg/mL) and AUC((0-)(tau)()) (83.6 pgh/mL). Detectable (S,S)-formoterol was consistently measured only after treatment with racemic formoterol. The mean percent increase in trough FEV(1) was 19.1% in the arformoterol group, and 16.0% and 18.2% in the 12 and 24 microg racemic formoterol groups, respectively. Changes in (R,R)-formoterol concentrations over time paralleled changes in FEV(1). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, plasma exposure to (R,R)-formoterol was similar for nebulized 15 microg arformoterol and 12 microg racemic formoterol DPI, and 40% lower than 24 microg racemic formoterol DPI. There was no evidence of chiral interconversion following treatment with arformoterol. Finally, temporal changes in airway function in all treatment groups corresponded to changes in (R,R)-formoterol plasma concentrations.     

Maintenance therapy with budesonide and formoterol in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Lung function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can be improved acutely by oral corticosteroids and bronchodilators. Whether clinical improvement can be maintained by subsequent inhaled therapy is unknown. COPD patients (n=1,022, mean prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 36% predicted) initially received formoterol (9 microg b.i.d.) and oral prednisolone (30 mg o.d.) for 2 weeks. After this time, patients were randomised to b.i.d. inhaled budesonide/formoterol 320/9 microg, budesonide 400 microg, formoterol 9 microg or placebo for 12 months. Postmedication FEV1 improved by 0.21 L and health-related quality of life using the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) by 4.5 units after run-in. Fewer patients receiving budesonide/formoterol withdrew from the study than those receiving budesonide, formoterol or placebo. Budesonide/formoterol patients had a prolonged time to first exacerbation (254 versus 96 days) and maintained higher FEV1 (99% versus 87% of baseline), both primary variables versus placebo. They had fewer exacerbations (1.38 versus 1.80 exacerbations per patient per year), had higher prebronchodilator peak expiratory flow, and showed clinically relevant improvements in SGRQ versus placebo (-7.5 units). Budesonide/formoterol was more effective than either monocomponent in both primary variables. Budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler (Symbicort) maintains the benefit of treatment optimisation, stabilising lung function and delaying exacerbations more effectively than either component drug alone or placebo.     

Effects of formoterol on exercise tolerance in severely disabled patients with COPD

OBJECTIVE: We wished to evaluate the effects of inhaled formoterol, a long-acting beta(2)-adrenergic agonist, on exercise tolerance and dynamic hyperinflation (DH) in severely disabled chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. DESIGN: In a two-period, crossover study, 21 patients with advanced COPD (FEV(1)=38.8+/-11.7% predicted, 16 patients GOLD stages III-IV) were randomly allocated to receive inhaled formoterol fumarate 12 microg twice daily for 14 days followed by placebo for 14 days, or vice versa. Patients performed constant work-rate cardiopulmonary exercise tests to the limit of tolerance (Tlim) on a cycle ergometer: inspiratory capacity (IC) was obtained at rest and each minute during exercise. Baseline and transitional dyspnoea indices (BDI and TDI) were also recorded. RESULTS: Eighteen patients completed both treatment periods. Formoterol treatment was associated with an estimated increase of 130 s in Tlim compared with placebo (P=0.052): this corresponded to a 37.8% improvement over placebo (P=0.012). Enhanced exercise tolerance after bronchodilator was associated with diminished DH marked by higher inspiratory reserve and tidal volumes at isotime and exercise cessation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between formoterol and placebo on exercise dyspnoea ratings; however, all domains of the TDI improved (P相似文献   

Formoterol mono- and combination therapy with tiotropium in patients with COPD: a 6-month study

Although guidelines recommend combining long-acting bronchodilators in COPD, data are limited. We examined the clinical efficacy and safety of formoterol, tiotropium and the combination in patients with COPD. Eight hundred and forty-seven patients with COPD (mean FEV(1) 52% predicted; FEV(1)/FVC 53%) were randomized to receive one of the following four treatments for 24 weeks: formoterol 10 microg b.i.d. plus tiotropium 18 microg o.d.; formoterol 10 microg b.i.d.; tiotropium 18 microg o.d., or placebo. The study was partially blinded (formoterol and placebo). For the primary endpoint, FEV(1) 2h post-dose after 24 weeks, there were small differences in favour of the combination therapy versus formoterol (0.07 L, p=0.044) or tiotropium (0.06 L, p=0.066). All three treatments were superior to placebo (p<0.001). The combination was statistically superior to monotherapy for: the primary endpoint (p=0.044 vs. formoterol); FEV(1) 5 min after the first dose (p<0.001) and at 12 weeks (p<0.05 vs. tiotropium); and peak expiratory flow averaged over the first 6 weeks (p<0.001 vs. both). The three active treatments were significantly more effective than placebo for secondary endpoints: COPD-related 'bad days', symptoms, use of rescue medication and peak expiratory flow, and aspects of health-related quality of life. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar with all active treatments, although COPD-related adverse events were more common with tiotropium. Combined bronchodilator therapy may be a valuable treatment option for patients with COPD.     

Onset and duration of action of formoterol and tiotropium in patients with moderate to severe COPD

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management guidelines recommend regular treatment with one or more long-acting bronchodilators for patients with moderate to severe COPD. OBJECTIVE: To compare the onset and duration of action of formoterol and tiotropium in patients with COPD. METHODS: This randomized, multicentre, open-label crossover study in 38 patients with COPD (mean age 64 years; mean FEV(1) 55% predicted) assessed the effect of 7 days of treatment with formoterol (12 microg b.i.d. via Foradil Aerolizer) vs. tiotropium (18 microg o.d. via Spiriva HandiHaler) on lung function measured over a period of 12 h after the first dose on day 1 and the last dose on day 8. RESULTS: The primary efficacy variable, FEV(1)-AUC during the first 2 h post-dose (FEV(1)-AUC(10-120 min)), was significantly higher for formoterol compared with tiotropium, with between-treatment differences of 124 ml (p = 0.016) after the first dose and 80 ml (p = 0.036) after 7 days' treatment in favour of formoterol. FEV(1) measured 12 h after inhalation did not differ statistically significantly between treatments. Adverse events occurred in 2 (5%) patients after treatment with formoterol and in 5 (12%) patients after treatment with tiotropium. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates faster onset of action and greater bronchodilation of formoterol vs. tiotropium for bronchodilation within the first 2 h of inhalation (FEV(1)-AUC(10-120 min)) and comparable bronchodilation 12 h post-inhalation in patients with moderate to severe COPD.     

Bronchodilator response to albuterol after regular formoterol and effects of acute corticosteroid administration

BACKGROUND: There is controversy about the development of bronchodilator subsensitivity after regular administration of long-acting beta(2)-agonists. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether regular treatment with formoterol affects the bronchodilator response to repeated puffs of albuterol, and also to assess the effects of acute administration of a bolus dose of IV or inhaled corticosteroid. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients (mean [SD] age, 43 [15] years; FEV(1), 57 [17] % predicted) with stable, moderate to severe persistent asthma who were all taking inhaled corticosteroids were evaluated in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study. Patients received treatments each for 2 weeks followed by a bolus (IV/inhaled) of corticosteroid or placebo: (1) placebo inhaler bid + bolus placebo; (2) formoterol Turbuhaler 24 microg metered dosage bid (delivered dosage 18 microg bid) + placebo; (3) formoterol 24 microg bid + bolus IV hydrocortisone, 200 mg; or (4) formoterol 24 microg bid + bolus inhaled budesonide, 1,600 microg. Bronchodilator response to repeated puffs of albuterol (200 to 1,600 microg) for > 80 min was measured at 2 h after bolus administration of placebo or corticosteroid. The study was powered at the 80% level to detect a 20% difference in area under curve between 20 and 80 min (AUC) for FEV(1) response to albuterol as change from baseline (primary end point). RESULTS: There was significant subsensitivity (p = 0.01) of the mean albuterol FEV(1) response (as AUC, L x s) after formoterol alone (737) as compared to placebo (1,453) along with partial reversal by steroid administration: formoterol + hydrocortisone (1, 050), and formoterol + budesonide (942). There was a similar pattern of subsensitivity (p = 0.03) for the mean albuterol forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity response (as AUC, L): placebo (2,149), formoterol alone (1,002), formoterol + hydrocortisone (1,402), and formoterol + budesonide (1,271). CONCLUSION: Regular treatment with formoterol produced significant bronchodilator subsensitivity to repeated puffs of albuterol, which was partially reversed by a bolus dose of systemic or inhaled corticosteroid.     

Formoterol for maintenance and as-needed treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Formoterol is a long-acting beta2-agonist with a rapid onset of effect in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), making it potentially suitable for both maintenance and as-needed bronchodilator treatment. To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of maintenance formoterol in patients with COPD and to compare the effects of additional formoterol as needed with terbutaline. In this 6-month, double-blind study, 657 patients with COPD (40 years, forced expiratory volume in 1s [FEV1] 40-70% predicted normal) were randomized to formoterol 9 microg twice daily (bid) plus terbutaline 0.5 mg as needed (FORM bid), formoterol 9 microg bid plus formoterol 4.5 microg as needed (FORM bid+prn), or placebo bid plus terbutaline 0.5 mg as needed (placebo), all administered via Turbuhaler. Primary efficacy variables were FEV1 and the sum of breathlessness and chest tightness scores combined symptom score. Formoterol significantly (P<0.01) increased FEV(1) compared with placebo: FORM bid 6.5% (95% CI: 2.5, 10.7%); FORM bid+prn 11.8% (95% CI: 7.7, 16.2%). Combined symptom score decreased significantly in both formoterol groups compared with placebo: FORM bid -0.27 (95% CI: -0.49, -0.06; P=0.012); FORM bid+prn -0.32 (95% CI: -0.53, -0.11; P=0.0026). Similar significant (P<0.05) improvements were seen in both formoterol groups for morning peak expiratory flow, cough and sleep scores, and reliever use. In this study, formoterol 9 microg bid via Turbuhaler as maintenance therapy, with either formoterol or terbutaline as rescue medication, provided sustained improvements in lung function and COPD symptoms. Both formoterol regimens were well tolerated with no differences in adverse events or electrocardiogram profiles.     

Rapid onset of bronchodilation in COPD: a placebo-controlled study comparing formoterol (Foradil Aerolizer) with salbutamol (Ventodisk)

Formoterol fumarate is a beta2-agonist bronchodilator that combines a fast onset of action with a long duration of action. Its fast onset of action is well documented in asthma but has not been directly compared with that of salbutamol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to assess the bronchodilatory effects over the first 3 h after inhalation of single doses of formoterol 24 microg delivered via the Aerolizer dry powder inhaler device (double-blind), or salbutamol 400 microg delivered by a Diskhaler dry powder inhaler (single-blind) in patients with COPD. A total of 24 patients with COPD were randomized [mean age 61.6 +/- 7.8 years, mean forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) 1.38 +/- 0.32 l and 45.8 +/- 9.6% of predicted]. Inhalation of formoterol or salbutamol resulted in similar increases in FEV from 0 to 3 h post-dose. Both drugs produced similar bronchodilation by 5 min, which became almost maximal by 30 min. The primary efficacy variable, the area under the curve (AUC) of the FEV increase above predose baseline from 0 to 30 min (AUC(0-30 min)), demonstrated significant effects for formoterol (mean 5.89 +/- 4.67 l min(-1)), and salbutamol (mean 6.06 +/- 4.34 l min(-1)), which were not statistically different from each other but statistically significantly higher (P<0.0001) than that observed with placebo (-0.32 +/- 2.59 l min(-1)). In addition, both formoterol and salbutamol produced similar and rapid increases in forced vital capacity (FVC). In summary, this study confirms the rapid onset of action of formoterol and indicates that the onset of action of formoterol and salbutamol are similar in patients with COPD.     

Incremental benefit of adding oxitropium bromide to formoterol in patients with stable COPD.

The effects of the long-acting beta(2)-agonist formoterol, the anticholinergic drug oxitropium bromide, and their combination were compared in 16 patients with partially reversible stable COPD. On each of 4 study days patients inhaled both drugs separated by 180 min in alternate sequence, with formoterol being administered in two doses (formoterol 12 microg + oxitropium bromide 200 microg; oxitropium bromide 200 microg + formoterol 12 microg; formoterol 24 microg + oxitropium bromide 200 microg; oxitropium bromide 200 microg + formoterol 24 microg). FEV(1)and FVC were measured baseline and after 30, 60, 120, 180, 210, 240, 300 and 360 min. In terms of onset of action, formoterol performed better than oxitropium bromide. Within the first 180 min after inhalation formoterol 24 microg was the most effective drug (maximal change in FEV(1): formoterol 24 microg = 25.6%, formoterol 12 microg = 21.1%, oxitropium bromide = 18.2%). Increased bronchodilation was obtained when the second drug was added, the sequence formoterol 24 microg + oxitropium bromide being the most effective (maximal change in FEV(1)over baseline: formoterol 24 microg + oxitropium bromide 28.8%, oxitropium bromide + formoterol 24 microg 20.9%, formoterol 12 microg + oxitropium bromide 26.6%, oxitropium bromide + formoterol 12 microg 22.5%). Significant improvement in pulmonary function may be achieved by giving two different bronchodilators in stable COPD patients. The sequence formoterol 24 microg + oxitropium bromide 200 microg seems to be the most effective.     

Anti-inflammatory effects of combined budesonide/formoterol in COPD exacerbations

Systemic corticosteroids and additional short-acting beta2-agonists are commonly used in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In this double-blind study, the combination of a high-dose inhaled corticosteroid with a rapid-onset long-acting beta2-agonist was evaluated in the treatment of out-patient COPD exacerbations. The primary aim was to compare 14-day treatment effects of budesonide/formoterol to placebo on sputum eosinophils and, secondarily, on other indices of inflammation, forced expiratory flow in one second (FEV(1)), symptoms, health status, and adverse events. Forty-five patients not using steroids (37 male, 21/24 current/ex smoker, median packyears 38, age 65 years, FEV(1) 61% predicted), experiencing a COPD exacerbation, were treated at home with budesonide/formoterol (320/9 microg 4 times daily), prednisolone (30 mg daily), or placebo for 14 days. Sputum eosinophils were significantly reduced by budesonide/formoterol (-57%) compared to placebo (+24%) (p = 0.01). Budesonide/formoterol reduced total symptom scores significantly (p = 0.01) compared to placebo. The increase in FEV(1) by 2 weeks of treatment with budesonide/formoterol (125 ml) was not significantly different from that of placebo (43 ml) (p = 0.07). Budesonide/ formoterol treatment did not suppress morning serum cortisol compared to placebo (-16%; p = 0.50). In conclusion, budesonide/formoterol reduces sputum eosinophils and improves symptoms in the treatment of out-patient COPD exacerbations.     

Effects of formoterol in apparently poorly reversible chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study was designed to investigate the effects of the long-acting beta2-adrenoreceptor agonist formoterol fumarate in 12 current or exsmokers having chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with a mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 47% of predicted, poorly reversible (5.1% pred) after terbutaline sulphate inhalation. After inhaling a single dose of formoterol (6 or 24 microg), or placebo via Turbuhaler, FEV1 and pulmonary function parameters measured during quiet breathing (work of breathing (WoB) and airway resistance (Raw)) were recorded over 12 h on three test days. Immediate changes in FEV1 were modest, although each dose of formoterol caused a response >12% pred within 10 min in one subject. Compared to placebo, both doses of formoterol induced a clinically and statistically relevant improvement in WoB (>25%) and Raw (>20%), which occurred within 10 min and lasted over a period of 12 h (p < or = 0.02, analysis of variance). Thus, inhaled formoterol causes long-lasting lung functional improvements in apparently poorly reversible chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Additional lung function measurements during quiet breathing after forced expiration tests may be useful in such patients to assess beneficial effects of bronchodilators.     

Inhaled formoterol dry powder versus ipratropium bromide in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

We compared the effectiveness of inhaled formoterol with that of ipratropium in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). After a 2-wk run-in period, 780 patients with COPD were randomized to receive for 12 wk formoterol dry powder 12 or 24 microg twice daily, ipratropium bromide 40 microg four times daily, or placebo in a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study. The primary efficacy variable was the area under the curve for forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) measured over 12 h after 12 wk of treatment. Secondary variables included diary symptoms and quality of life. Both doses of formoterol and ipratropium significantly increased the area under the curve for FEV(1) in comparison with placebo (all p < 0.001). Both doses of formoterol were also significantly superior to ipratropium (all p < 0.025). Compared with placebo, both doses of formoterol significantly improved symptoms (all p < or = 0.007) and quality of life (p < 0.01 for total scores) whereas ipratropium did not show significant effects (all p > or = 0.3). All study treatments exhibited a similar safety profile. We conclude that formoterol is more effective than ipratropium bromide in the treatment of COPD, as the efficacy of ipratropium on airflow obstruction does not translate into a clinical benefit that patients can perceive.     

Reversing acute bronchoconstriction in asthma: the effect of bronchodilator tolerance after treatment with formoterol.

Continuous treatment with a short-acting beta2-agonist can lead to reduced bronchodilator responsiveness during acute bronchoconstriction. This study evaluated bronchodilator tolerance to salbutamol following regular treatment with a long-acting beta2-agonist, formoterol. The modifying effect of intravenous corticosteroid was also studied. Ten asthmatic subjects (using inhaled steroids) participated in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Formoterol 12 microg b.i.d. or matching placebo was given for 10-14 days with >2 weeks washout. Following each treatment, patients underwent a methacholine challenge to induce a fall in forced expired volume in one second (FEV1) of at least 20%, then salbutamol 100 microg, 100 microg, and 200 microg was inhaled via a spacer at 5 min intervals, with a further 400 microg at 45 min. After a third single-blind formoterol treatment period, hydrocortisone 200 mg was given intravenously prior to salbutamol. Dose-response curves for change in FEV1 with salbutamol were compared using analysis of covariance to take account of methacholine-induced changes in spirometry. Regular formoterol resulted in a significantly lower FEV1 after salbutamol at each time point compared to placebo (p<0.01). The area under the curves (AUCs) for 15 (AUC0-15) and 45 (AUC0-45) min were 28.8% and 29.5% lower following formoterol treatment (p<0.001). Pretreatment with hydrocortisone had no significant modifying effect within 2 h of administration. It is concluded that significant tolerance to the bronchodilator effects of inhaled salbutamol occurs 36 h after stopping the regular administration of formoterol. This bronchodilator tolerance is evident in circumstances of acute bronchconstriction.     

Formoterol and salmeterol in partially reversible chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A crossover, placebo-controlled comparison of onset and duration of action.

BACKGROUND: In contrast to the well-known activity profile in asthma, the precise efficacy and optimum dose schedules of long-acting beta(2)-agonists in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are not clear. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to compare the onset and the duration of action of a single inhalation of formoterol and salmeterol in COPD patients having partially reversible airway obstruction. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized, crossover and placebo-controlled study design, the respiratory functions of 22 patients (mean age 57.3+/-5.4 years) having mild to severe COPD (5 mild, 8 moderate and 9 severe) and partially reversible airway obstruction [mean baseline reversibility of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) 19.3+/-3.1%] were evaluated after inhalation of 12 microg formoterol and 50 microg salmeterol. RESULTS: Regarding the onset of bronchodilator action, the mean absolute increase of 0.20 liters in FEV(1) 10 min after inhalation of formoterol was significantly higher than baseline and that of placebo (0.04 liters), whereas that of salmeterol (0.11 liters) did not reach statistical significance. At 20 min, both formoterol (0.25 liters) and salmeterol (0.20 liters) produced a significant increase in FEV(1) compared with baseline and with that of placebo (0.04 liters). The peak bronchodilator effects occurring at 60 and 120 min following formoterol (0.39 liters) and salmeterol (0.40 liters) inhalation, respectively, were significantly higher than the corresponding levels of placebo (0.02 and -0.12 liters, respectively). Concerning the duration of action, the 12-hour values of both formoterol (0.25 liters) and salmeterol (0.22 liters) were significantly higher than that of placebo (-0.12 liters). The area under the curve values of FEV(1) of formoterol (3.5+/-1.3 l.h) and salmeterol (3.2+/-1.2 l x h) averaged over 12 h were comparable and higher than placebo values (1.2+/-0.5 l x h). After formoterol inhalation 2 patients experienced tremor and 1 had palpitation; 1 tremor and 1 headache attack were noted after salmeterol. For the pharmacologically predictable side effects, there was no difference between the drugs. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this study revealed that a single dose of 12 microg formoterol and 50 microg salmeterol provided comparable bronchodilation within 12 h and had tolerable side effects in patients with mild to severe COPD having partially reversible airway obstruction.     

Influence of higher than conventional doses of oxitropium bromide on formoterol-induced bronchodilation in COPD

We examined the influence of higher than conventional doses of oxitropium bromide on formoterol-induced bronchodilation in patients with partially reversible stable COPD. Twenty outpatients inhaled one or two puffs of formoterol (12 microg puff(-1)), or placebo. Two hours after inhalation, a dose-response curve to inhaled oxitropium bromide (100 microg puff(-1)) or placebo was constructed using one puff, one puff, two puffs and two puffs, for a total cumulative dose of 600 microg oxitropium bromide. Doses were given at 20-min intervals and measurements made 15 min after each dose. On six separate days, all patients received one of the following: (1) formoterol 12 microg + oxitropium bromide 600 microg, (2) formoterol 12 microg + placebo, (3) formoterol 24 microg + oxitropium bromide 600 microg, (4) formoterol 24 microg + placebo, (5) placebo + oxitropium bromide 600 microg, or (6) placebo + placebo. Both formoterol 12 microg and 24 microg induced a good bronchodilation (formoterol 12 microg, 0.19-0.20 l; formoterol 24 microg 0.22-0.24 l). The dose-response curve of oxitropium, but not placebo, showed an evident increase in FEV1, with a further significant increase of respectively 0.087 l and 0.082 l after the formoterol 12 microg and formoterol 24 microg pre-treatment. This study shows that improved pulmonary function in patients with stable COPD may be achieved by adding oxitropium 400-600 microg to formoterol. There is not much difference in bronchodilation between combining oxitropium with formoterol 12 microg or 24 microg. In any case, formoterol 24 microg alone seems sufficient to achieve the same bronchodilation induced by oxitropium 600 microg alone in most patients.     

Formoterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized, controlled, 3-month trial.

The aim of this study was to investigate formoterol, an inhaled long-acting beta2-agonist, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Six-hundred and ninety-two COPD patients, mean baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 54%, FEV1/forced vital capacity 75% of predicted, reversibility 6.4% pred, were treated with formoterol (4.5, 9 or 18 microg b.i.d.) or placebo via Turbuhaler for 12 weeks. Symptoms were recorded daily. Spirometry and the incremental shuttle walking test (SWT) were performed at clinic visits. Compared with placebo, 18 microg b.i.d. formoterol reduced the mean total symptom score by 13% and increased the percentage of nights without awakenings by 15%. Formoterol (9 and 18 microg b.i.d.) significantly reduced symptom scores for breathlessness (-7% and -9%, respectively) and chest tightness (-11% and -8%, respectively), reduced the need for rescue medication (-25% and -18%, respectively), and increased symptom-free days (71% and 86%, respectively). FEV1 improved significantly after all three doses of formoterol (versus placebo). No differences were found between groups in SWT walking distance. No unexpected adverse events were seen. In conclusion, 9 and 18 microg b.i.d. formoterol reduced symptoms and increased the number of symptom-free days in a dose-dependent manner in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Formoterol improved lung function at a dose of 4.5 microg b.i.d. and higher.     

Bronchodilator response to formoterol Turbuhaler in patients with COPD under regular treatment with formoterol Turbuhaler

Formoterol Turbuhaler has been suggested for as-needed use in asthmatic patients. We investigated whether regular treatment with formoterol would modify the dose-response curves to formoterol in patients with partially reversible COPD. In this randomised, double-blind, cross-over study taking place over four non-consecutive days 16 outpatients with moderate to severe COPD, who were under regular treatment with formoterol Turbuhaler (18 microg in two daily doses) from at least 4 months, inhaled a conventional dose of formoterol Turbuhaler 9 microg or placebo. Two hours later, a FEV(1) value was established, following which a dose-response curve to formoterol (4.5 microg/inhalation) or placebo was constructed using four inhalations (1+1+2)--total cumulative delivered dose of 18 microg formoterol--with the following sequences: (1) formoterol pre-treatment + formoterol 18 microg, (2) formoterol pre-treatment + placebo, (3) placebo pre-treatment + formoterol 18 microg, (4) placebo pre-treatment + placebo. Formoterol 9 microg induced significant (P < 0.0001) bronchodilation at 2 h after inhalation (best mean increase in FEV(1): 0.170 L). Afterwards, dose-dependent increases in FEV(1) occurred with formoterol (maximum mean increase from 2-h value with formoterol: 0.072 after formoterol pre-treatment, and 0.201 L after placebo pre-treatment). Both maximum values of bronchodilation after the last inhalation of formoterol were statistically different (P < 0.001) from 2-h levels. These results show that dose-dependent bronchodilatation of formoterol is maintained despite regular treatment.