自动巢式多重PCR系统在呼吸道感染病例中快速检测呼吸道病原体的应用

目的 探讨自动巢式多重PCR系统在呼吸道感染病原体快速诊断中的应用价值.方法 2016年11月至2017年3月收集120例呼吸道感染患者的呼吸道标本和临床流行病学资料,利用自动巢式多重PCR系统对120份鼻咽拭子标本进行病原检测,对检测结果和临床资料进行统计学分析.结果 120份标本中单一病原检出68份,2种及2种以上病原混合检出22份,总检出率为75.0％(90/120),检出结果中以甲型流感病毒、呼吸道合胞病毒、百日咳杆菌为主.结论 自动巢式多重PCR系统敏感度高、特异性强,对呼吸道感染患者的病原学快速诊断具有重要价值.     

多重PCR检测儿童呼吸道感染常见病毒

目的 对深圳、粤东地区儿童呼吸道病毒感染进行监测、分析,探讨其流行规律.方法 2006年6月-2008年6月,于汕头大学附属医院、深圳市第四人民医院、揭阳市人民医院采集毛细支气管炎、支气管肺炎、喘息支气管炎等的患儿咽拭子或鼻咽分泌物标本686份,多重PCR进行9种呼吸道病毒检测.结果 在686例标本中病毒阳性362例(52.77%),其中呼吸道感染患儿中呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)感染占首位,达到31.22%(113/362),其次是鼻病毒(RHV)为16.85%(61/362),最低是流感病毒B型(IVB)占0.83%(3/362),流感病毒A型(IVA)占14.36%(52/362),副流感病毒1型(PIV1)和副流感病毒3型(PIV3)分别占7.73%(28/362)和8.29%(30/362),腺病毒(AdV)达到9.67%(35/362),而人博卡病毒(hBOV)和人偏肺病毒(hMPV)分别占6.08%(22/362)和4.97%(18/362).结论 RSV、RHV及IVA是华南地区儿童呼吸道感染的主要病毒病原,混合感染以RSV、IVA联合其他病毒感染为主,诊治时应根据所感染病原体制定有针对性的措施.     

Development and evaluation of a panel of multiplex one-tube nested real time PCR assay for simultaneous detection of 14 respiratory viruses in five reactions

Multiplex real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (mRT-qPCR) assay is commonly used to detect respiratory viruses, however, the sensitivity is limited for most reports. A panel of locked nucleic acid based multiplex closed one-tube nested real-time PCR (mOTNRT-PCR) assay consisting of five separate internally controlled RT-qPCR assays was developed for detection of 14 respiratory viruses. The sensitivity and reproducibility of mOTNRT-PCR panel were evaluated using plasmid standards and the specificity was evaluated using clinical samples. The clinical performance of mOTNRT-PCR panel was further evaluated with 468 samples collected from patients with an acute respiratory infection and compared with individual real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) assay. The analytical sensitivities of mOTNRT-PCR panel ranged from 2 to 20 copies/reaction, and no cross-reaction with common respiratory viruses was observed. The coefficients of variation of intra-assay and inter-assay were between 0.35% and 8.29%. Totally 35 clinical samples detected by mOTNRT-PCR assay panel were missed by RT-qPCR and confirmed true positive by sequencing of nested PCR products. The mOTNRT-PCR assay panel provides a more sensitive and high-throughput method for the detection of 14 respiratory viruses.     

Evaluation of the Prodesse Hexaplex multiplex PCR assay for direct detection of seven respiratory viruses in clinical specimens

We evaluated the Hexaplex assay (Prodesse, Waukesha, WI) for the detection of 7 respiratory viruses (influenza A and B, parainfluenza 1-3, and respiratory syncytial virus [RSV] A and B). The Hexaplex assay was performed on 300 respiratory samples during the 1999-2000 respiratory virus season. Results of this assay were compared with shell vial cell culture and/or direct fluorescent antibody stain. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the assay were 96.6% and 94.1%, respectively. The respective sensitivity and specificity of the Hexaplex assay for detection of specific virus groups were as follows: influenza A, 98.6% and 97.8%; influenza B, 100% and 100%; and for parainfluenza viruses (1-3), 100% and 99.1%. The assay did not perform as well with patients infected with RSV: sensitivity and specificity were 91.0% and 98.6%, respectively. There are 2 major drawbacks to this assay: it is technically demanding (3-4 hours hands-on time), and it is expensive ($80-$90 direct cost). Nevertheless, because of the excellent sensitivity and specificity, the Hexaplex assay may be valuable in the diagnosis of respiratory viral infections in immunocompromised patients.     

多重实时PCR检测三种呼吸道病毒

目的建立多重实时PCR检测体系可同时快速检测引起人呼吸道感染的甲型流感病毒（IAV）、呼吸道合胞病毒（RSV）和SARS冠状病毒（SARS-CoV）。方法通过对PCR反应条件的优化，建立了同时检测IAV、RSV和SARS-CoV的多重实时PCR方法。结果经熔解曲线分析，证实了该法可同时或分别检测3种重要呼吸道病毒。检测灵敏度分别为10^0.7 TCID50／ml、1 TCID50／ml和10^-0.5 TCID50／ml。采用相同的反应体系和条件，分别对其他7种呼吸道病毒（包括乙型流感病毒，副流感病毒2型，柯萨奇病毒B3和B5血清型及腺病毒2、3和7血清型）进行扩增，均未检测出扩增产物。此种方法可在4h内完成。结论建立的多重实时PCR检测方法适用于3种重要呼吸道病毒的快速检测。     

Improved detection of episomal Banana streak viruses by multiplex immunocapture PCR

Banana streak viruses (BSV) are currently the main viral constraint to Musa germplasm movement, genetic improvement and mass propagation. Therefore, it is necessary to develop and implement BSV detection strategies that are both reliable and sensitive, such as PCR-based techniques. Unfortunately, BSV endogenous pararetrovirus sequences (BSV EPRVs) are present in the genome of Musa balbisiana. They interfere with PCR-based detection of episomal BSV in infected banana and plantain, such as immunocapture PCR. Therefore, a multiplex, immunocapture PCR (M-IC-PCR) was developed for the detection of BSV. Musa sequence tagged microsatellite site (STMS) primers were selected and used in combination with BSV species-specific primers in order to monitor possible contamination by Musa genomic DNA, using multiplex PCR. Furthermore, immunocapture conditions were optimized in order to prevent Musa DNA from interfering with episomal BSV DNA during the PCR step. This improved detection method successfully allowed the accurate, specific and sensitive detection of episomal DNA only from distinct BSV species. Its implementation should benefit PCR-based detection of viruses for which homologous sequences are present in the genome of their hosts, including transgenic plants expressing viral sequences.     

A novel capillary electrophoresis-based multiplex PCR assay for detection of respiratory pathogens

The field of infectious disease testing has recently experienced rapid expansion in the number of multiplexed PCR-based assays available for detecting respiratory pathogens. This study provides a preliminary evaluation of a multiplex assay from Seegene that uses capillary electrophoresis as the detection platform for viral and bacterial respiratory pathogens. We compared this technology to a real-time PCR assay for 3 viral targets. Thirty respiratory samples were collected that had previously tested positive for either Flu A, Flu B, or RSV (ten of each). The Seegene assay detected 9/10 Flu A samples, 9/10 Flu B, and 10/10 RSV, for a total detection rate of 93%. The two samples that were undetected by the Seegene assay both generated late-crossing thresholds on the real-time platform, consistent with low viral loads. The Seeplex assay provides a promising alternative for multiplex respiratory testing.     

多重PCR检测方法和液态芯片技术在呼吸道病毒检测中的应用研究

目的 评估澳大利亚维多利亚感染性疾病参比实验室（The Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory,VIDRL）的呼吸道病毒多重PCR检测方法和Luminex公司多指标同步分析液态芯片技术-呼吸道病毒检测试剂盒（xTAG RVP）,应用于多种常见呼吸道病毒检测的优势和缺点,为更好地、有针对性地选择合适技术进行临床实验诊断或公共卫生应急检测提供依据.方法 使用VIDRL的呼吸道病毒多重PCR检测方法和Luminex公司xTAG RVP试剂盒对198份临床流感样症状患者的咽拭子标本进行常见呼吸道病毒的核酸检测.结果 198份临床标本经VIDRL多重PCR方法和xTAG RVP方法检测,阳性率分别为38.89％和45.45％,符合率为72.22％.单一病毒的符合率为87.88％～100％.结论 xTAG RVP方法与VIDRL多重PCR方法相比,两者在常见呼吸道病毒检测中的特异性和敏感性相近,xTAG RVP方法具有明显的快速和高通量的优势.     

Development of a respiratory virus panel test for detection of twenty human respiratory viruses by use of multiplex PCR and a fluid microbead-based assay

Virology laboratories historically have used direct fluorescent-antibody assay (DFA) and culture to detect six or seven respiratory viruses. Following the discovery of five new human respiratory viruses since 2000, there is an increasing need for diagnostic tests to detect these emerging viruses. We have developed a new test that can detect 20 different respiratory virus types/subtypes in a single 5-h test. The assay employs multiplex PCR using 14 virus-specific primer pairs, followed by a multiplexed target-specific primer extension (TSPE) reaction using 21 primers for specific respiratory virus types and subtypes. TSPE products were sorted and identified by using a fluid microsphere-based array (Universal Array; TmBioscience Corporation, Toronto, Canada) and the Luminex x-MAP system. The assay detected influenza A and B viruses; influenza A virus subtypes H1, H3, and H5 (including subtype H5N1 of the Asian lineage); parainfluenza virus types 1, 2, 3, and 4; respiratory syncytial virus types A and B; adenovirus; metapneumovirus; rhinovirus; enterovirus; and coronaviruses OC43, 229E, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus, NL63, and HKU1. In a prospective evaluation using 294 nasopharyngeal swab specimens, DFA/culture detected 119 positives and the respiratory virus panel (RVP) test detected 112 positives, for a sensitivity of 97%. The RVP test detected an additional 61 positive specimens that either were not detected by DFA/culture or were positive for viruses not tested for by DFA/culture. After resolution of discordant results by using a second unique PCR assay and by using a combined reference standard of positivity, the RVP test detected 180 of 183 true positives, for a sensitivity of 98.5%, whereas DFA and culture detected only 126 of 183 true positives, for a sensitivity of 68.8%. The RVP test should improve the capabilities of hospital and public health laboratories for diagnosing viral respiratory tract infections and should assist public health agencies in identifying etiologic agents in respiratory tract infection outbreaks.     

Nested multiplex PCR assay for detection of human enteric viruses in shellfish and sewage

Environmental samples and contaminated shellfish present frequently low concentrations of more than one viral species. For this reason, a nested multiplex RT-PCR was developed for the detection of adenoviruses, enteroviruses and hepatitis A viruses in different environmental samples such as urban sewage and shellfish. This assay will save time and cost for detection of these enteric viruses with a smaller sample volume, which otherwise can be a limiting factor in routine analysis. The limit of detection was approximately 1 copy for adenovirus and 10 copies for enterovirus and hepatitis A virus per PCR reaction using titrated cell-cultured viruses as template material. In shellfish and environmental samples, this multiplex PCR was optimized to detect all three viruses simultaneously when the concentration of each virus was equal or lower than 1000 copies per PCR reaction. This is the level found predominantly in the environment and in shellfish when the numbers of fecal bacterial and phage indicators are low. The detection of human adenoviruses by PCR has been suggested as a molecular index of fecal contamination of human origin in the environment and food and the multiplex assay developed may be a tool for evaluating the presence of viral contamination in shellfish and water and to expand microbiological control to include viral markers.     

A single-tube multiplex PCR for rapid detection in feces of 10 viruses causing diarrhea

A novel multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay was developed to identify 10 viruses in a single tube. The assay was targeted to detect group A and C rotaviruses, adenovirus, norovirus GI, norovirus GII, sapovirus, astrovirus, Aichi virus, parechovirus, and enterovirus. A total of 235 stool samples were collected from infants and children with acute gastroenteritis in Kyoto, Japan, from 2008 to 2009, then tested by this novel multiplex PCR and compared with a multiplex PCR described previously, which used 3 primer sets. The novel multiplex PCR could detect the targeted viruses in 111 of the 235 (47.2%) stool samples. Of these, 9 out of 10 types of viruses were identified, including group A rotavirus, norovirus GII, enterovirus, sapovirus, adenovirus, parechovirus, group C rotavirus, astrovirus, and norovirus GI. In contrast, the multiplex PCR that used 3 sets of primers could detect the targeted viruses in 109 of the 235 (46.4%) stool samples. Among these, 8 types of viruses were identified, including group A rotavirus, norovirus GII, enterovirus, adenovirus, parechovirus, group C rotavirus, sapovirus, and astrovirus. The results suggested that the new multiplex PCR is useful as a rapid and cost effective diagnostic tool for the detection of major pathogenic viruses causing diarrhea.     

Development of duplex real-time PCR for detection of two DNA respiratory viruses

A method was developed for the detection and quantitation of HAdV (human adenovirus) and HBoV (human bocavirus) based on a duplex real-time PCR, the AB PCR, using a Smartcycler instrument. A control real-time PCR was carried out on albumin DNA to standardise the non-homogenous respiratory samples. No cross-reactivity was observed with viruses or bacteria that could be found in the respiratory tract. The diagnosis rate using the AB PCR on clinical samples was 10.7%: 3.4% for HBoV detection, 6.9% for HAdV detection and 0.3% double detection HBoV–HAdV. The clinical and epidemiological characteristics of the HAdV- and HBoV-infected patients were evaluated. In the HAdV-positive group and the HBoV-positive group the samples were classified according to the severity of the disease. The HAdV viral load did not appear to be linked to the severity of the disease. Conversely, the difference between the two HBoV groups, severe and non-severe, was significant statistically when the comparison was based on the viral load (P = 0.006) or after adjustment of the viral load to the number of cells in the samples (P = 0.02).     

Development of three multiplex RT-PCR assays for the detection of 12 respiratory RNA viruses

Three multiplex hemi-nested RT-PCR assays were developed to detect simultaneously 12 RNA respiratory viruses: influenza viruses A, B and C, human respiratory syncytial virus (hRSV), human metapneumovirus (hMPV), parainfluenza virus types 1-4 (PIV-1, -2, -3 and -4), human coronavirus OC43 and 229E (HCoV) and rhinovirus (hRV). An internal amplification control was included in one of the RT-PCR assays. The RT-PCR multiplex 1 and the hemi-nested multiplex 1 detected 1 and 0.1 TCID50 of RSV A, respectively, and 0.01 and 0.001 TCID50 of influenza virus A/H3N2, respectively. Two hundred and three nasal aspirates from hospitalised children were retrospectively tested in comparison with two conventional methods: direct immunofluorescence assay and viral isolation technique. Almost all samples (89/91) that were positive by immunofluorescence assay and/or viral isolation technique were detected by the multiplex assay. This method also detected an additional 85 viruses and 33 co-infections. The overall sensitivity (98%), rapidity and enhanced efficiency of these multiplex hemi-nested RT-PCR assays suggest that they would be a significant improvement over conventional methods for the detection of a broad spectrum of respiratory viruses.     

Typing of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses by a multiplex PCR assay.

A rapid multiplex PCR assay was developed to distinguish between North American and European genotypes of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus after a portion of the polymerase gene (open reading frame 1b) was sequenced for two North American PRRS virus strains. DNA products with unique sizes characteristic of each genotype were obtained.     

Clinical evaluation of multiplex real-time PCR panels for rapid detection of respiratory viral infections

Respiratory viral infections are one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality, particularly in children, the elderly and immunocompromised persons. Rapid identification of viral etiology is critical in ruling out non-viral infections, initiating antiviral treatment and limiting the spread of the infection. Multiplex assays of more than one viral gene target in a single tube have the advantage of rapid screening of a large number of potential viral pathogens in a short time. A multiplex real-time PCR assay was used in this study for detection of respiratory RNA and DNA viral infections in 728 specimens received from 585 adult and pediatric patients comprised of symptomatic and asymptomatic organ transplant recipients and non-recipients for diagnosis of respiratory illnesses and for routine clinical monitoring. Multiplex PCR was more sensitive than the multiplex immunofluoresence culture assay (R-mix) and also detected additional respiratory viruses that were not covered by the R-mix panel. The number of respiratory viruses detected in symptomatic patients was significantly higher than asymptomatic patients in both adult and pediatric patients. Herpesviral infections were the predominant cause of lower respiratory tract infection in the organ transplant recipients, whereas respiratory syncytial virus was the most common pathogen in non-transplant patients particularly children. Multiplex real-time PCR for detection of respiratory viruses has the potential for rapid identification of viral pathogens. In this era of emerging viral infections, addition of newer viral targets to the multiplex PCR panels will be beneficial in determining both patient management and public health epidemiology.     

Multiplex real-time PCR assay for detection of influenza and human respiratory syncytial viruses

A multiplex real-time PCR assay was developed with a LightCycler instrument for detection of influenza viruses A and B and the human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV). Detection of each viral product and of an internal control was based on determination of specific melting temperatures by the LightCycler software. The lower limit of detection in the multiplex PCR assay was found to be 50 copies for each viral target. In an evaluation of nasopharyngeal samples collected from hospitalized children (ages, 0 to 3 years) with acute respiratory tract infections during the winter of 2001 to 2002, a viral pathogen was detected by the multiplex PCR test in 139 (66.8%) of 208 cases, including 45 (21.6%) influenza A virus infections, no (0%) influenza B virus infections, 106 (51%) HRSV infections, and 12 (5.8%) coinfections. The multiplex PCR test was compared to rapid antigen detection assays for influenza viruses A and B (Directigen; Becton Dickinson, Sparks, Md.) and HRSV (RSV TestPack; Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Ill.) in 172 and 204 samples, respectively. After resolution of discrepant test results by use of additional PCR assays targeting other viral genes, the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of the multiplex PCR assay for influenza A virus were 100 and 97.7% compared to 43.6 and 98.5% for the antigenic test. Similarly, the Se and Sp of the multiplex PCR assay for HRSV were 94.5 and 98.9% compared to 81.6 and 94.7% for the antigenic test. In conclusion, our multiplex real-time PCR assay combines both rapidity and sensitivity for detecting the most important respiratory viral pathogens in children.     

Comparison of two multiplex methods for detection of respiratory viruses: FilmArray RP and xTAG RVP

We compared the FilmArray RP (Idaho Technology, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT) and the xTAG RVP (Luminex Corporation, Toronto, Canada) multiplex respiratory virus PCR methods for the detection of respiratory viruses in a set of 200 patient specimens frozen at -70 °C after standard viral culture and antigen detection methods were done. Both systems detected between 40 to 50% more viruses than traditional methods, primarily rhinoviruses and human metapneumovirus. The FilmArray RP detected significantly more total viruses either alone or as part of mixed infections than the xTAG RVP, as well as an additional 21.6% more respiratory syncytial viruses. The xTAG RVP requires 5 to 6 h with 2.5 to 3 h of hands-on time, while the FilmArray RP takes about an hour with 3 to 5 min of hands-on time, making it much easier to perform.