An observational study on the epidemiology of respiratory tract bacterial pathogens and their susceptibility to four injectable beta-lactam antibiotics: piperacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime and ceftriaxone

Bacterial infections of the respiratory tract account for a large proportion of total medical consultations in general practice. In recent years, antibiotic resistance has increased alarmingly in a number of bacterial species that are common causes of these infections. The aim of this observational study was to determine the antibiotic resistance of microbial agents isolated from patients with acute or acutely exacerbated respiratory infections. Subjects recruited as potential sources of bacteria were either outpatients seen in a number of specialized clinics and hospital practices, or hospitalized patients. Overall, 648 consecutive patients (67% male, mean age 48.1+/-27.0 years) with infection of the upper or lower respiratory tract were observed during a 13-month period. A total of 551 pathogenic microbial strains were isolated and tested for their in vitro susceptibility to piperacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone. Among all isolates, the four most frequent pathogens were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (132 isolates, 24%), Streptococcus pyogenes (99 isolates, 18%), Staphylococcus aureus (93 isolates, 17%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (46 isolates, 8%). The susceptibility of gram-positive isolates ranged from 97.5% to 95.1%, and no remarkable difference was found in the antibacterial activity of tested b-lactam antibiotics. The susceptibility of gram-negative isolates to piperacillin and piperacillin/tazobactam was also similar: 96.5% and 97.1%, respectively. In contrast, differences were found between piperacillin (or piperacillin/tazobactam) and either ceftazidime (p=0.003) or ceftriaxone (p<0.0003) in gram-negative isolates. We conclude that, despite the extensive use of beta-lactam antibiotics (piperacillin, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone) in medical practice during the past three decades, the susceptibility of the most common pathogens involved in the etiology of upper and lower respiratory tract infections to these antibiotics is still high. In particular, bacterial resistance developed by gram-positive organisms against piperacillin is negligible and not alarming.     

Comparative In- Vitro Activity of Piperacillin and Piperacillin Plus Tazobactam Towards Beta-Lactamase Producing Clinical Isolates

Summary

The authors evaluated the in-vitro antibacterial activity of piperacillin alone and of piperacillin combined with tazobactam, a new beta-lactamase inhibitor, on 398 clinical isolates, both Gram-positive and Gram-negative. The piperacillin/tazobactam combination was evaluated in the fixed ratio 8:1. The vast majority of the microorganisms tested had reduced susceptibility to piperacillin (minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range 0.12— > 256 mg/1) due to beta-lactamase production.

The following results were obtained: against Haemophilus influenzae, tazobactam was effective in reducing the MICs of piperacillin by 512 fold. The activity of piperacillin/tazobactam was lower against Pseudomonas sp., while some activity was demonstrated against some strains of Klebsiella. Good activity was seen not only against methicillin-susceptible (MS) staphylococci but also against some methicillin-resistant (MR) strains. In the latter, the combination of piperacillin/tazobactam was active only if the strains showed beta-lactamase production. These findings are interesting above all in regard to the synergistic effect demonstrated against MR beta-lactamase producing staphylococci and the Klebsiella-Enterobacter-Serratia (KES) group.     

Bacteremia Due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Results from a 3-Year National Study in the Slovak Republic

Abstract

Risk factors, mortality and antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremias isolated from 148 patients from all University Hospitals in Slovakia were analyzed. Only 1.2% of 169 strains of P. aeruginosa were resistant to meropenem, 4.1% to piperacillin/tazobactam, 7.7% to ceftazidime as well as cefepime and 12% to amikacin. More than 30% of P. aeruginosa were resistant to ciprofloxacin.

Our analysis of risk factors for antimicrobial resistance to the particular antimicrobials, indicated no difference in risk factors and outcome in cases infected with P. aeruginosa bacteremias resistant to amikacin, piperacillin/tazobactam or ceftazidime in comparison to episodes caused by P. aeruginosa due to susceptible isolates. When comparing risk factors for P. aeruginosa bacteremia in children vs. adults, cancer vs. non-cancer patients, several differences in risk factors were observed.

Neither antimicrobial resistance to amikacin, ceftazidime or piperacillin/tazobactam, nor appropriateness of therapy according to two separate analyses were associated with better outcome.     

Comparative Study of the In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Ciprofloxacin and Thirteen other Antimicrobial Drugs with Respect to Recently Isolated Pathogens

Summary

The in vitro antibacterial activity of ciprofloxacin and 13 other antimicrobial drugs was evaluated with respect to 569 pathogens, mainly isolated from urine. Ciprofloxacin was found active in 96.1% of all of the Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains tested, amikacin in 90.6%, ceftazidime in 89.8%, ceftriaxone in 85.3%, piperacillin in 82.7%, tobramycin in 82.6%, gentamicin in 81.5%, aztreonam in 78.3%, nitrofurantoin in 72.6%, cotrimoxazole in 71.6%, cinoxacin in 71.0%, pipemidic acid in 70.6%, nalidixic acid in 66.7%, ampicillin in 50.1%. Ciprofloxacin was found to be the most active of the drugs studied against the bacterial strains which cause urinary, respiratory and other infections.     

Comparative antimicrobial potency of meropenem tested against Gram-negative bacilli: report from the MYSTIC surveillance program in the United States (2004)

The Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC) Program is a longitudinal resistance surveillance network of more than 100 medical centers worldwide monitoring the susceptibility of bacterial pathogens to carbapenems and other broad-spectrum agents. In 2004 (year six), the antimicrobial activity of 12 broad-spectrum agents was assessed against 2,799 Gram-negative bacterial isolates submitted from 15 United States (USA) medical centers using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI; formerly NCCLS) recommended methods. Meropenem continued to demonstrate a high potency with MIC90 values 4- to 32-fold lower than imipenem against the Enterobacteriaceae. The wide spectrum of activity for meropenem against all Gram-negative isolates was demonstrated by the overall rank order of percentage susceptibility at CLSI breakpoints: amikacin (96.5%) > meropenem (96.0%) > imipenem (95.8%) > piperacillin/tazobactam (91.5%) > tobramycin (91.4%) > cefepime (91.2%) > ceftazidime (89.0%) > gentamicin (88.0%) > aztreonam (81.5%) > levofloxacin (80.5%) > ciprofloxacin (80.2%) > ceftriaxone (69.1%). Only the aminoglycosides (84.5%) and carbapenems (76.1-83.8%) exhibited acceptable levels of susceptibility against the Acinetobacter spp. isolates as this species group became more resistant to all antimicrobial classes. A continued increase in the resistance rate for both ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin over the six years was observed, most alarming among Escherichia coli (20.2-20.7%) and indole-positive Proteus species (34.4-42.2%) isolates, some documented as clonal. Continued surveillance of these broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents appears warranted to monitor the potency and spectrum of activity against Gram-negative pathogens causing serious infections and the emergence of new or novel resistance mechanisms that could compromise carbapenem therapy.     

Antimicrobial Resistance of Gram-Negative Isolates from Intensive Care Units in Turkey: Comparison to Previous Three Years

Abstract

Resistance rates to selected antibiotics of Gram-negative bacteria isolated from intensive care units (ICU) of 16 Turkish hospitals during 1998 were evaluated and compared to data from the previous 3 years. Antibiotic susceptibilities to imipenem, ceftazidime, ceftazidime-clavulanate, cefoperazone-sulbactam, ceftriaxone, cefepime, cefodizime, cefuroxime, piperacillin-tazobactam, ticar-cillin-clavulanate, gentamicin, amikacin and ciprofloxacin were determined by Etest. A total of 1,404 isolates from 1,060 patients were collected, mainly from urinary and respiratory tracts. As in the previous 3 years, Pseudomonas spp. was the most frequently isolated Gram-negative species (29.7%), followed by Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter and Klebsiella spp. Imipenem was the most active in vitro agent (73.4% susceptible), followed by ciprofloxacin (60.6%), cefoperazone-sulbactam (58.7%), cefepime (56.7%), piperacillin-tazobactam (55.0%) and amikacin (54.7%). In 1996, a decline in susceptibility rates of all antibiotics was evident. With the exception of imipenem, resistance to which remained stable, rates somewhat increased in 1997. In 1998, susceptibility to imipenem and cefepime remained stable, amikacin resistance tended to increase and susceptibility rates to other antibacterials showed a favorable increase. These results may in part be due to the implementation of a surveillance program and increased understanding of the magnitude of the resistance problem.     

In Vitro Activity of Meropenem against Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Abstract

The in-vitro susceptibilities of a total of 174 ciprofloxacin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were determined. According to the BSAC and NCCLS breakpoints, meropenem, aztreonam, ceftibuten, ceftazidime, imipenem and cefotaxime were the most active (>90%) antimicrobial agents tested against Enterobacteriaceae. Susceptibility of these strains to piperacillin/tazobactam, cefpodoxime and cefixime (84.96%) was higher than that to tobramycin, gentamicin and fosfomycin (50-75%). More than 90% of P. aeruginosa were susceptible to meropenem when both interpretative susceptibility breakpoint criteria were used. Piperacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam and ceftazidime were active against 50-75% of the same strains. Meropenem was the most active antimicrobial tested against all ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical isolates assayed.     

Susceptibility of 228 Non-fermenting Gram-Negative Rods to Tigecycline and Six Other Antimicrobial Drugs

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the in vitro activity of tigecycline and 6 other antimicrobial drugs used in clinical practice against 228 clinical isolates of nonfermenting Gram-negative rods (NFGNRs) including Acinetobacter spp. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined according to the recommendations of the Clinical and laboratory Standards institute. For tigecycline, we used the criteria approved by the FDA. Almost 50% of the clinical isolates of Acinetobacter spp. were resistant to piperacillin/tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and ceftazidime. Strains of this microorganism were more susceptible to imipenem, and even more susceptible to colistin and tigecycline; no strains were resistant to tigecycline. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia showed even greater resistance to the drugs tested. Thus, all strains were resistant to imipenem and a large percentage (82.6%) were resistant to piperacillin/tazobactam. Resistance to the other agents tested was also high, with the exception of tigecycline, with only 3 resistant strains (MIC <8 mg/ml). Tigecycline, on the other hand, was scarcely active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which bears efflux pump systems such as MexXY-OprM. Almost 90% of strains were resistant to ciprofloxacin; only 8% were resistant to gentamicin; over half were colistin-intermediate or -resistant, and finally, approximately half of the strains were susceptible to the 3 beta-lactams studied. In conclusion, NFGNRs present variable susceptibility patterns, although they are generally highly resistant to antimicrobial agents including those considered more specific. Tigecycline, which showed good activity against most of the strains examined, broadens the spectrum of drugs available for the treatment of infections caused by these complex microorganisms.     

In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of the New Quinolone Bay y3118 against Clinical Isolates

Summary

The in vitro antibacterial activity of the new fluoroquinolone Bay y3118 against 609 clinical isolates was evaluated. Bay y3118 exhibited activity against a broad spectrum of organisms, including Gram-negative bacilli, Gram-positive cocci, mycobacteria. The activity of Bay y3118 was often superior to that of other quinolones. Against Gram-negative bacilli its activity was similar to that of ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ceftazidime and imipenem except for Serratia marcescens, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter spp. and Xanthomonas maltophilia, where its activity was superior. Gentamicin and piperacillin sometimes were less active. Bay y3118 was active against a large number of Gram-positive cocci. The fluoroquinolones tested were active against all the strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, but only Bay y3118 was effective against Mycobacterium avium.     

A pharmacodynamic simulation to assess tigecycline efficacy for hospital-acquired pneumonia compared with other common intravenous antibiotics

A pharmacodynamic model was used to generate supportive data comparing tigecycline with other broad-spectrum agents against pathogens implicated in hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). A 5000 patient Monte Carlo simulation determined the probability of target attainment (PTA) of tigecycline (+/- ceftazidime) compared with imipenem, levofloxacin, and piperacillin/tazobactam (+/- vancomycin). PTA was calculated over MICs of current Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria collected from worldwide surveillance and weighted by the expected prevalence of these pathogens causing HAP. For monotherapy, the weighted PTA was imipenem (78.2%), piperacillin/tazobactam (73.3%), tigecycline (62.9%), and levofloxacin (62.5%). By pathogen PTA was greatest for tigecycline against Gram-positives, and ceftazidime or imipenem against Gram-negatives. Combination therapy increased PTA to 88.6%, 85.5%, 80.6%, and 69.8% for tigecycline, imipenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, and levofloxacin, respectively. Based on contemporary resistance data, tigecycline plus ceftazidime is predicted to achieve its pharmacodynamic targets similarly to combination therapy with imipenem plus vancomycin for the treatment of patients with HAP.     

Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative isolates from intensive care units in Turkey: analysis of data from the last 5 years

A multicenter antimicrobial surveillance program was established in Turkey in 1995 to monitor the predominant Gram-negative pathogens from intensive care units (ICUs) and antimicrobial resistance patterns of these isolates. Sixteen hospitals participated in the study and a total of 1479 isolates from 1,100 patients were collected. The isolates were tested for their susceptibility against 13 antibiotics by E-test method. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for each isolate were determined for imipenem, ceftazidime, ceftazidime-clavulanate, cefoperazone-sulbactam, ceftriaxone, cefepime, cefuroxime, piperacillin-tazobactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, gentamicin, amikacin and ciprofloxacin. The most common isolates were Pseudomonas spp. (28.2%), Escherichia coli (19.2%) and Klebsiella spp. (19.1%). We found very high resistance rates to all major antibiotics that are used to treat serious infections. Although imipenem is the most active agent, it had an overall susceptibility rate of 68%. Half of the tested Klebsiella spp. strains were found to produce ESBL. This is a very high rate when compared with the literature. Cross-resistance among species was also investigated. 52% of ciprofloxacin-resistant strains were also resistant to imipenem, 80% to ceftazidime, 97% to ceftriaxone, 86% to amikacin and 19% of imipenem-resistant strains were susceptible to ceftazidime and 18% to amikacin. When susceptibilities of the years 1995 and 1999 were compared, the most interesting finding was the decrease in resistance to 3rd generation cephalosporins. In conclusion, this national clinical isolate database shows that resistance rates are high, the change over years is not predictable and continuous surveillance is necessary to monitor antimicrobial resistance and to guide antibacterial therapy.     

Resistance patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to carbapenems and piperacillin/tazobactam.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a major problem as a multiresistant nosocomial pathogen, especially in burns and other immunocompromised patients in our hospital. The present prospective study, conducted between June 1996 and December 1997, was aimed at determining the extent of its resistance against highly active antipseudomonal drugs, such as carbapenems (imipenem and meropenem) and ureidopenicillin with beta-lactamase inhibitor (piperacillin/tazobactam); existence of any cross resistance or difference in susceptibility between imipenem and meropenem; and to compare the activity of piperacillin/tazobactam with the two carbapenems against P. aeruginosa. Of the 357 P. aeruginosa isolates tested from 188 patients 37 (10.4%) were resistant to imipenem, 21 (5.9%) to meropenem and 50 (14%) to piperacillin/tazobactam. Cross resistance between the two carbapenems was observed in 5.9% of the isolates. Sixteen (43%) of the imipenem-resistant isolates were susceptible to meropenem but the reverse was observed in none. Amongst the 50 piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant isolates cross resistance with the two carbapenems was observed in 18 (36%) and in 9 (18%) only with imipenem; 23 (46%) were susceptible to both. Our results indicate that P. aeruginosa is least resistant to meropenem followed by imipenem and piperacillin/tazobactam. Cross resistance between the carbapenems and between carbapenems and piperacillin/tazobactam was found. The study further suggests that burns, cardiac-neuro-pediatric surgical, cancer and transplant patients are more susceptible to acquiring infection due to multiresistant P. aeruginosa than other types of patients and common infection sites were wounds, respiratory tract, urine, blood and intravascular lines.     

A Survey of Antimicrobial Drug Resistance in Respiratory Tract Pathogens,Isolated in a Northern Italian Teaching Hospital Between 1990 and 1999

Abstract

Drug susceptibility test results of respiratory tract pathogens, isolated from patients admitted to the Clinic of Respiratory Diseases of the IRCCS San Matteo Hospital, University of Pavia (Italy) between 1990 and 1999, were retrospectively evaluated. A total of 1366 bacterial isolates were collected, including 499 Grampositive and 867 Gram-negative strains. In comparison to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, the methicillin-resistant strains (MRSA) showed high levels of resistance to many selected antibiotics, except for glycopeptides. Resistance rates to beta-lactams were high in both Pseudomonas aeruginosa and in the other Gram-negative isolates, while aminoglycoside and ciprofloxacin resistance was less than 20%. Some pathogens became more resistant to selected antimicrobials during the observation period, including staphylococci to methicillin, MRSA to ciprofloxacin, P. aeruginosa isolates to imipenem and ciprofloxacin, and the other Gram-negative strains to almost all drugs considered, with the exception of cefotaxime and cotrimoxazole.     

Antimicrobial Activity of Isepamicin (SCH21420, 1-N-HAPA Gentamicin B) Combinations with Cefotaxime,Ceftazidime, Ceftriaxone,Ciprofloxacin, Imipenem,Mezlocillin and Piperacillin Tested Against Gentamicin-Resistant and Susceptible Gram-Negative Bacilli and Enterococci

Summary

Isepamicin, formerly SCH21420 or 1-N-HAPA gentamicin B, is an aminoglycoside that was tested alone or in combination with one of seven broad spectrum drugs against 80 clinical isolates. Half of the strains were gentamicin-resistant but only one isolate (1.396) was resistant to isepamicin. The broadest spectrum comparison drugs tested alone (ciprofloxacin at 3.8% resistance and imipenem at 5.096 resistance) were associated with the lowest synergy rates when combined with isepamicin. The rank order of synergy (complete or partial) was; cefotaxime = ceftazidime = ceftriaxone = mezlocillin = piperacillin (7596 to 8096) > imipenem (66%) > ciprofloxacin (38%). Isepamicin/ampicillin combinations produced synergistic killing of those enterococci not having high-grade resistance to gentamicin or kanamycin. Enterococcus faecium strains were also refractory to isepamicin/ampicillin synergy. Isepamicin appears to be widely useable against gentamicin-resistant gram-negative bacilli cither alone or combined with most commonly used broad spectrum bcta-lactams.     

Bacterial Isolates from Severe Infections and Their Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns in Italy: a Nationwide Study in the Hospital Setting

Abstract

The most frequent agents of severe bacterial infections and their antibiotic susceptibility patterns were determined in patients admitted to 45 Italian hospitals over the years 2002-2003. The most common diagnoses were: sepsis (33.8%), pneumonia (9.4%), intravascular catheter-associated infections (9.3%) and ventilator- associated pneumonia (8.1%). Overall, 5115 bacterial isolates were identified from 4228 patients. Three bacterial species, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli, accounted for more than 50% of the isolates. Other prevalent bacterial isolates were Staphylococcus epidermidis and Enterococcus faecalis, while Acinetobacter baumanii ranked third among all Intensive Care Unit (ICU) isolates. 7% of S. aureus had intermediate resistance to vancomycin. Although E. faecalis displayed no vancomycin resistance, 34% of vancomycin- resistant isolates were found among Enterococcus faecium, one of the highest rates found to date, emphasizing the difference between these two enterococcal species. All the Gram-positive pathogens were susceptible to linezolid, with the exception of approximately 2% of the enterococcal isolates that were intermediate with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)=4 μg/ml. Almost 10% of Escherichia coli, 14% of Klebsiella pneumoniae, 22% of Serratia marcescens and 50% of Enterobacter cloacae were non-susceptible to cefotaxime. Amikacin was the most active antibiotic against P. aeruginosa that showed lack of susceptibility to ceftazidime, gentamicin, piperacillin and ciprofloxacin ranging from 20 to 35%. Finally, Acinetobacter baumanii showed a high level of resistance to all the antibiotics tested including imipenem (58%). The results obtained in this study, the first of its kind in Italy, offer indications for guiding empirical therapy and implementing specific interventions to fight antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections and their transmission in the hospital setting in Italy.     

P16INK4a Overexpression is Associated with Poor Clinical Outcome in Ovarian Carcinoma

Abstract

Tigecycline is the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved glycylcycline antibiotic. It has shown remarkable in vitro activity against a wide variety of Gram-positive, Gram-negative and anaerobic bacteria including many multidrug resistant (MDR) strains. However, it has minimal activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Proteus spp. To date, little resistance to tigecycline has been reported. Clinical trials studying complicated skin and skin-structure infections (cSSSIs) demonstrated that tigecycline has equivalent efficacy and safety compared with the combination of van-comycin and aztreonam. For complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), tigecycline was found to be as effective as imipenem/cilastatin. Adverse events related to tigecycline therapy, i.e. nausea and vomiting, were tolerable. Currently available data suggest that tigecycline may play an important role in the future as a monotherapy alternative to older broad-spectrum antibiotics, such as advanced generation cephalosporins, carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, piperacillin/tazobactam, and Gram-positive directed agents (e.g. daptomycin, linezolid and quinupristin/dalfopristin) for which resistance is being increasingly reported from all parts of the world.     

Bacteremia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa: results from a 3-year national study in the Slovak Republic

Risk factors, mortality and antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremias isolated from 148 patients from all University Hospitals in Slovakia were analyzed. Only 1.2% of 169 strains of P. aeruginosa were resistant to meropenem, 4.1% to piperacillin/tazobactam, 7.7% to ceftazidime as well as cefepime and 12% to amikacin. More than 30% of P. aeruginosa were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Our analysis of risk factors for antimicrobial resistance to the particular antimicrobials, indicated no difference in risk factors and outcome in cases infected with P. aeruginosa bacteremias resistant to amikacin, piperacillin/tazobactam or ceftazidime in comparison to episodes caused by P. aeruginosa due to susceptible isolates. When comparing risk factors for P. aeruginosa bacteremia in children vs. adults, cancer vs. non-cancer patients, several differences in risk factors were observed. Neither antimicrobial resistance to amikacin, ceftazidime or piperacillin/tazobactam, nor appropriateness of therapy according to two separate analyses were associated with better outcome.     

Comparative study of the in vitro antibacterial activity of ciprofloxacin and thirteen other antimicrobial drugs with respect to recently isolated pathogens

The in vitro antibacterial activity of ciprofloxacin and 13 other antimicrobial drugs was evaluated with respect to 569 pathogens, mainly isolated from urine. Ciprofloxacin was found active in 96.1% of all of the Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains tested, amikacin in 90.6%, ceftazidime in 89.8%, ceftriaxone in 85.3%, piperacillin in 82.7%, tobramycin in 82.6%, gentamicin in 81.5%, aztreonam in 78.3%, nitrofurantoin in 72.6%, cotrimoxazole in 71.6%, cinoxacin in 71.0%, pipemidic acid in 70.6%, nalidixic acid in 66.7%, ampicillin in 50.1%. Ciprofloxacin was found to be the most active of the drugs studied against the bacterial strains which cause urinary, respiratory and other infections.     

In vitro effects of sulbactam combinations with different antibiotic groups against clinical Acinetobacter baumannii isolates

Abstract

Treatment of multidrug resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii infections causes some problems as a result of possessing various antibacterial resistance mechanisms against available antibiotics. Combination of antibiotics, acting by different mechanisms, is used for the treatment of MDR bacterial infections. It is an important factor to determine synergy or antagonism between agents in the combination for the constitution of effective therapy. The study aimed to determine in vitro interactions interpreted according to calculated fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index between sulbactam and ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, meropenem, tigecycline, and colistin. Ten clinical isolates of A. baumannii were tested for determination of synergistic effects of sulbactam with different antimicrobial combinations. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of both sulbactam and combined antibiotics decreased 2- to 128-fold. Synergy and partial synergy were determined in combination of sulbactam with ceftazidime and gentamicin (FIC index: ≤0·5 or >0·5 to <1) and MIC values of both ceftazidime and gentamicin for five isolates fell down below the susceptibility break point. Similarly, MIC value of ciprofloxacin for six ciprofloxacin resistant isolates was determined as below the susceptibility break point in combination. However, all isolates were susceptible to colistin and tigecycline, MIC values of both were decreased in combination with sulbactam. Although synergistic and partial synergistic effects were observed in the combination of sulbactam and ceftriaxone, all isolates remained resistant to ceftriaxone. The effect of cefepime–sulbactam combination was synergy in five, partial synergy in one and indifferent in four isolates. Meropenem and sulbactam showed a partial synergistic effect (FIC index: >0·5 to <1) in three, an additive effect (FIC index: 1) in one and an indifferent effect (FIC index: >1–2) in six isolates. Antagonism was not determined in any combination for clinical A. baumannii isolates in the study. In conclusion, sulbactam is a good candidate for combination treatment regimes for MDR A. baumannii infections.     

Gram-Negative Non-Fermenting Bacteria from Food-Producing Animals are Low Risk for Hospital-Acquired Infections

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate possible indications of epidemiological relationships between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from food-producing animals and those of clinical origin. Screening for P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii isolates from food-producing animals was carried out on 1381 samples. usceptibility testing and PCR amplification of resistance genes were determined. Isolate clonal relatedness was established by PFGE. Forty-one P. aeruginosa and 16 A. baumannii were detected. All P. aeruginosa isolates were sensitive to ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime and piperacillin/tazobactam and seven isolates had low-level imipenem resistance. All A. baumannii isolates were sensitive to imipenem, meropenem, ciprofloxacin and piperacillin/tazobactam but were resistant to ceftazidime. The imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa and ceftazidime-resistant A. baumannii had different PFGE patterns compared to those of human origin. Based on the findings presented here, animal isolates were not multidrug resistant and they do belong to a different pool from those of humans.