Physical Therapy and Manual Physical Therapy: Differences in Patient Characteristics

Abstract

This study compared socio-demographic characteristics, health problem characteristics, and primary process data between database samples of patients referred to physical therapy (PT) versus a sample of patients referred to manual physical therapy (MPT) in the Netherlands. Statistical analysis indicated that that the MPT sample was significantly (P<0.01) different from the PT samples with regards to the socio-demographic data in that the patients in the MPT sample were younger, had attended post-secondary education to a greater degree, and were more often gainfully employed. The MPT sample was significantly (P≤0.01) different from the PT samples in that health problem data in the MPT sample indicated mainly acute, non-surgical orthopaedic or neurological, spine-related complaints of recent occurrence. Recurrence was significantly (P<0.01) more common and complaints were significantly (P=0.01) more often non-traumatic in the MPT sample. MPT referrals were significantly (P<0.01) different from PT referrals in that the MPT referral originated more frequently with a general practitioner but not with a medical specialist and that referral occurred within three months of occurrence. Primary treatment goals and interventions are discussed, as are study limitations, suggestions for future research, and relevance to the international situation.     

Dizziness in Orthopaedic Physical Therapy Practice: History and Physical Examination

Abstract

Physical therapy (PT) differential diagnosis of patients complaining of dizziness centers on distinguishing those patients who might benefit from sole management by the physical therapist from those patients who require referral for medical-surgical differential diagnosis and (co) management. There is emerging evidence that PT management may suffice for patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, cervicogenic dizziness, and musculoskeletal impairments leading to dysequilibrium. This article provides information on the history taking and physical examination relevant to patients with a main complaint of dizziness. The intention of the article is to enable the therapist to distinguish between patients complaining of dizziness due to these three conditions amenable to sole PT management and those patients who likely require referral. Where available, we have provided data on reliability and validity of the history items and physical tests described to help the clinician establish a level of research-based confidence with which to interpret history and physical examination findings. The decision to refer the patient for a medical-surgical evaluation is based on our findings, the interpretation of such findings in light of data on reliability and validity of history items and physical tests, an analysis of the risk of harm to the patient, and the response to seemingly appropriate intervention.     

Influential Variables Associated with Outcomes in Patients with Cervicogenic Headache

Abstract

Cervicogenic headache (CGH) is a common sequela of upper cervical dysfunction with a significant impact on patients. Diagnosis and treatment have been well validated; however, few studies have described characteristics of patients that are associated with outcomes of physical therapy treatment of this disorder. A retrospective chart review of patient data was performed on a cohort of 44 patients with CGH. Patients had undergone a standardized physical therapy treatment approach that included spinal mobilization/manipulation and therapeutic exercise, and outcomes of treatment were determined by quantification of changes in headache pain intensity, headache frequency, and self-reported function. Multiple regression analysis was utilized to determine the relationship between a variety of patient-specific variables and these outcome measures. Increased patient age, provocation or relief of headache with movement, and being gainfully employed were all patient factors that were found to be significantly (P<0.05) related to improved outcomes.     

Cervicogenic Dizziness: A Case Report Illustrating Orthopaedic Manual and Vestibular Physical Therapy Comanagement

Abstract

The diagnosis and treatment of patients with dizziness of a cervical origin may pose a challenge for orthopaedic and vestibular physical therapy specialists. A thorough examination, which consists of a screening examination to rule out pathologies not amenable to sole physical therapy management and, if indicated, a physical therapy differential diagnostic process incorporating both cervical spine and vestibular tests and measures, may indicate an appropriate course of management. The treatment progression is then based on patient signs, symptoms, and response to physical therapy interventions. This case study describes the diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of a patient with cervicogenic dizziness co-managed by a vestibular and an orthopaedic manual physical therapist.     

Physical Therapy Diagnosis and Management of a Patient with Chronic Daily Headache: A Case Report

Abstract

Chronic headaches are a significant health problem for patients and often a clinical enigma for the medical professionals who treat such patients. The purpose of this case report is to describe the physical therapy diagnosis and management of a patient with chronic daily headache. The patient was a 48-year-old woman with a medical diagnosis of combined common migraine headache and chronic tension-type headache. An exacerbation of these long-standing headache complaints had resulted in a chronic daily headache for the preceding eight months. Symptoms included bilateral headache, neck pain, left facial pain, and tinnitus. Outcome measures used included the Henry Ford Hospital Headache Disability Inventory (HDI) and the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Examination revealed myofascial, articular, postural, and neuromuscular impairments of the head and neck region. Treatment incorporated myofascial trigger point dry needling, orthopaedic manual physical therapy, exercise therapy, and patient education. On the final visit, the patient reported no headaches during the preceding month. There was a 31% improvement in the HDI emotional score, a 42% improvement in the functional score, and a 36% improvement in the total score for the HDI, the latter exceeding the minimal detectable change for the total score on this measure. The NDI at discharge showed an 18% improvement with a maximal improvement during the course of treatment of 26%. Both improvements exceeded the minimal clinically important difference for the NDI. This case report indicates that physical therapy diagnosis and management as described may be indicated for the conservative care of patients with chronic headaches.     

Physical Therapy Exercise Intervention Based on Classification Using the Patient Response Method: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Abstract

It has been suggested that inclusion into a study that categorizes patients in mutually exclusive, clinometric classifications should improve the outcome of an exercise based randomized clinical trial. This review examined the evidence regarding the effectiveness of physical therapist-directed therapeutic exercises when patients were classified using the patient response method. This systematic literature review restricted article inclusion to English-only articles that classified homogenous samples of low back pain patients using the patient response based method, demonstrated physical therapist-directed exercise interventions, and used specific outcome criteria for assessment of patient improvement. The PEDro scale was used to rate the methodological quality of the studies. Of 82 articles reviewed only 5 articles were accepted. All 5 met the PEDro standards for a high-quality study. Of the 5 articles, 4 demonstrated that physical therapy exercise intervention based on the patient response method of classification were significantly better than the pragmatic control comparisons; the remaining article indicated that exercise was less effective than manipulation. There appears to be a trend toward positive outcomes with physical therapy exercise intervention in trials restricted to the patient response method of classification; however, few studies have investigated this phenomenon.     

The Effect of Timing of Physical Therapy for Acute Low Back Pain on Health Services Utilization: A Systematic Review

ObjectiveTo synthesize literature about the effect of early physical therapy (PT) for acute low back pain (LBP) on subsequent health services utilization (HSU), compared to delayed PT or usual care.Data SourcesElectronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase) were searched from their inception to May 2018.Study SelectionStudy selection included randomized control trials and prospective and retrospective cohort studies that investigated the association between early PT and HSU compared to delayed PT or usual care. Two independent authors screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles for inclusion based on eligibility criteria, and a third author resolved discrepancies. Eleven out of 1146 articles were included.Data ExtractionTwo independent reviewers extracted data on participants, timing of PT, comparisons to delayed PT or usual care, and downstream HSU, and a third reviewer assessed the information to ensure accuracy and reach consensus. Risk of bias was assessed with the Downs and Black checklist using the same method.Data SynthesisEleven studies met eligibility criteria. Early PT is within 30 days of the index visit for acute LBP. Five out of 6 studies that compared early PT to delayed PT found that early PT reduces future HSU. Random effects meta-analysis indicated a significant reduction in opioid use, spine injection, and spine surgery. Five studies compared early PT to usual care and reported mixed results.ConclusionsEarly PT for acute LBP may reduce HSU, cost, and opioid use, and improve health care efficiency. This review may assist patients, health care providers, health care systems, and third-party payers in making decisions for the treatment of acute LBP.     

A clinical contrast: physical therapists with low back pain treating patients with low back pain

Abstract

Patients with low back pain (LBP) often display faulty beliefs and cognitions regarding their pain experience. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) aims to alter the pain experience by targeting these faulty beliefs and cognitions. One PNE strategy aims specifically to reframe commonly held beliefs about tissues by patients with LBP as the single source of pain. In line with this reasoning, it is hypothesized that physical therapists (PT) treating patients with LBP may indeed experience similar, if not worse, pain experiences while treating a patient with LBP. To date, this assumption has never been studied. A PT LBP questionnaire was developed, validated and distributed to a convenience sample of attendees of an international PT conference. One-hundred and ten PTs completed the questionnaire for a 71% response rate. Ninety percent of the PTs reported having experienced LBP, with 27% at the conference experiencing LBP at the time. Of the PTs that have experienced LBP 75% reported not having received any imaging; 81% no formal diagnoses, 58% no treatment and 86% not having missed work due to LBP. Eighty-six percent of therapists reported having experienced LBP while treating a patient with LBP, with 50% convinced their LBP was higher than the LBP experienced by the patient they were treating. The results from this study indicate PTs often treat patients with LBP while suffering LBP. It is suggested that this knowledge may potentially help patients with LBP reconceptualize their LBP experience leading to expedited recovery.     

Roots of Physical Medicine,Physical Therapy,and Mechanotherapy in the Netherlands in the 19th Century: A Disputed Area within the Healthcare Domain

Abstract

Physical medicine, which in the context of this article includes mechanotherapy, hydrotherapy, balneotherapy, electrotherapy, light therapy, air therapy, and thermotherapy, became a new field of labor in the healthcare domain in the Netherlands around 1900. This article gives an account of the introduction and development of mechanotherapy as a professional activity in the Netherlands in the 19_th century. Mechanotherapy, which historically included exercises, manipulations, and massage, was introduced in this country around 1840 and became one of the core elements of physical medicine towards the end of that century. In contrast to what one might expect, mostly physical education teachers, referred to as "heilgymnasts," dedicated themselves to this kind of treatment, whereas only a few physicians were active in this field until the 1880s. When, in the last quarter of the 19 th century, differentiation and specialization within the medical profession took place, physicians specializing in physical medicine and orthopaedics began to claim the field of mechanotherapy exclusively for themselves. This led to tensions between them and the group of heilgymnasts that had already been active in this field for decades. The focus of attention in this article is on interprofessional relationships, on the roles played by the different professional organizations in the fields of physical education and medicine, the local and national governments, and the judicial system, and on the social, political, and cultural circumstances under which developments in the field of mechanotherapy took place. The article concludes with the hypothesis that the intra- and inter-occupational rivalries discussed have had a negative impact on the academic development of physical medicine, orthopaedics, and heilgymnastics/physical therapy in the Netherlands in the first half of the 20 th century.     

Outcomes of Telehealth Physical Therapy Provided Using Real-Time,Videoconferencing for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Longitudinal Observational Study

ObjectiveTo describe the feasibility of an evidence-based physical therapy (PT) program for persons with chronic low back pain (LBP) originally designed for in-person delivery, adapted for telehealth using videoconferencing.DesignProspective, longitudinal cohort.SettingThree health care systems in the United States.ParticipantsAdults, aged 18-64 years (N=126), with chronic LBP recruited from August through December 2020.InterventionUp to 8 weekly sessions of telehealth PT.Main Outcome MeasuresFollow-up assessments were 10 and 26 weeks after baseline. Participant outcomes collected were the Oswestry Disability Index, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 health domains, and pain self-efficacy. Implementation outcomes included acceptability, adoption, feasibility, and fidelity assessed using participant surveys and compliance with session attendance.ResultsWe enrolled 126 participants (mean age, 51.5 years; 62.7% female). Baseline perceptions about telehealth were generally positive. Eighty-eight participants (69.8%) initiated telehealth PT, with a median of 5 sessions attended. Participants in telehealth PT were generally satisfied (76.3%), although only 39.5% perceived the quality equal to in-person PT. Telehealth PT participants reported significant improvement in LBP-related disability, pain intensity, pain interference, physical function, and sleep disturbance at 10- and 26-week follow-ups.ConclusionsThe findings generally support the feasibility of telehealth PT using videoconferencing. Implementation and participant outcomes were similar to in-person PT as delivered in the participating health care systems. We identified barriers that may detract from the patient experience and likelihood of benefitting from telehealth PT. More research is needed to optimize and evaluate the most effective strategies for providing telehealth PT for patients with chronic LBP.     

Efficacy of IDET for Relief of Leg Pain Associated with Discogenic Low Back Pain

Abstract: Intradiscal electrothermal annuloplasty (IDET) is an effective treatment for chronic discogenic low back pain (LBP). However, efficacy of IDET for the treatment of referred leg pain has not been examined. This study was performed to assess the long‐term efficacy of IDET for the treatment of referred leg pain in chronic discogenic LBP patients. Data were retrospectively analyzed as an IDET case series from January 1999 to December 2000. The IDET procedure was performed at 1–3 symptomatic levels confirmed by pressure‐controlled discography. General pain outcome was evaluated by Visual Analog Scale (VAS). LBP and leg pain were assessed separately using five‐point pain scales (subsets of the North American Spine Society [NASS] LBP outcome assessment instrument: 0 = no pain, 4 = worst pain) at the 18‐month follow‐up. Among 129 patients who underwent IDET, 30 patients underwent subsequent back surgery and were excluded from the study, giving a total of 99 patients. Eighty‐three patients (83.8%) had leg pain without sciatica. Fifty‐two (52.5%), 21 (21.2%), and 8 (8.0%) patients showed LBP > leg pain, LBP = leg pain and LBP < leg pain, respectively. Fifty‐three out of 83 patients (63.9%) showed post‐IDET improvement in pain, with a mean VAS score of 3.28 ± 2.31. Thirty patients (36.1%) showed no improvement. A statistically significant (P < 0.05) improvement in subjective back and referred leg pain was observed. Improvements in back and referred leg pain were well‐correlated (r = 0.721, P < 0.01). A relatively large number of LBP patients who underwent IDET (84%) presented with referred leg pain without sciatica. The IDET procedure afforded improvements in leg pain that correlated well with improvements in back pain (0.75/4 and 0.88/4, respectively). These data suggest that IDET may relieve associated limb pain in chronic discogenic LBP patients.     

Physical Therapy (96)

The role of physical exercise and inactivity in pain recurrence and absenteeism from work after active outpatient rehabilitation for recurrent or chronic low back pain: A follow‐up study. (DBC International, Vantaa, Finland) Spine 2000;25:1809–1816. This study analyzed the role of physical exercise and inactivity on long‐term outcome after active outpatient low back rehabilitation. One hundred twenty‐five patients with low back pain, who had participated in a 12‐week active low back rehabilitation program, were asked about subjective pain and disability on the average of 14 months after the treatment. The outcomes were defined as a recurrence of persistent pain and work absenteeism, and a survival or failure analysis was performed between those who had continued exercising and who had been physically inactive. Recurrences of persistent pain during the follow‐up period were fewer (P = 0.03) among those who had maintained regular exercise habits after the treatment than among those who had been physically inactive. Similarly, work absenteeism was less (P < 0.01) among physically active than among physically inactive persons. However, patients with good outcome in pain reduction after low back pain rehabilitation were more likely to participate in physical exercise. Conclude that exercises are beneficial after guided treatment in the maintenance of the results of active treatment for recurrent chronic low back pain in the long term, but those with less favorable outcome in rehabilitation are less likely to participate in exercises afterward. In active treatment programs, it is recommended that exercises be incorporated after the guided treatment. Comment by Phillip S. Sizer Jr., MEd, PT. Historically, clinicians have instructed their patients to use trunk exercise to reduce the severity and duration of the symptoms and functional losses associated with low back pain (LBP). Through the years increasing evidence has supported this notion. However, fewer investigators have evaluated the impact of exercise after the rehabilitation process has been completed. This investigation performed this evaluation and found that regular, postrehabilitation exercise improved long‐term outcomes for patients who had previously suffered from LBP. Specifically, the investigators reported that ongoing exercise performed after an active outpatient rehabilitation program reduced recurrence of symptoms and absenteeism from work, especially after 1 year postonset. Additionally, these benefits did not appear to differ for those involved in self‐guided exercises versus those participating in a guided program with back‐specific devices in an outpatient treatment unit. This very interesting article reveals several pearls for the practitioner. First, subjects were not recruited on a voluntary basis, so to avoid attracting a group with good self‐motivation to alleviate their prevailing symptoms. This measure allows the outcomes to be applicable to a varied clinical population. Secondly, although the results favored the use of a guided program with back specific devices over self‐guided exercise, there were no statistical differences between the 2 approaches. Thus, patients can benefit from self‐monitored exercise even when they do not have access to a guided program using specific devices. Finally, the investigators revealed that poor clinical rehabilitation outcomes predicted postrehabilitation inactivity and reduced success with posttreatment exercise. Thus, the effectiveness of the rehabilitation process may influence patient's activity level and success of exercise after rehabilitation.     

Documentation of Red Flags by Physical Therapists for Patients with Low Back Pain

Abstract

The comprehensiveness of physical therapists' adherence to the guidelines for red flag documentation for patients with low back pain has not previously been described. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to describe that comprehensiveness. Red flags are warning signs that suggest that physician referral may be warranted. Clinic charts for 160 patients with low back pain seen at 6 outpatient physical therapy clinics were retrospectively reviewed, noting the presence or absence of 11 red flag items. Seven of the 11 red flag items were documented over 98% of the time. Most charts (96.3%) had at least 64% of the red flag items documented. Documentation of red flags was comprehensive in some areas but lacking in others. Red flags that were regularly documented included age over 50, bladder dysfunction, history of cancer, immune suppression, night pain, history of trauma, saddle anesthesia, and lower extremity neurological deficit. The red flags not regularly documented included weight loss, recent infection, and fever/chills. Factors influencing item documentation comprehensiveness are discussed, and suggestions are provided to enhance the completeness of recording patient examination data. The study results provide a red flag documentation benchmark for clinicians working with patients with low back pain and they lay the groundwork for future research.     

Vertebral Artery Blood flow Velocity Changes Associated with Cervical Spine rotation: A Meta-Analysis of the Evidence with implications for Professional Practice

Abstract

Many studies of vertebral artery (VA) blood flow changes related to cervical spine rotation have been published, but the findings are controversial and the evidence unconvincing. Recent Doppler measurements suggest that contralateral VA blood flow is compromised on full rotation in both healthy subjects and patients. More rigorous research is needed, and it was the aim of this study to conduct a meta-analysis of published data to inform professional practice. A systematic literature search, including only Doppler studies of VA blood flow velocity associated with cervical spine rotation in adults, yielded nine reports with published data. Using weighted means of the pooled data, the magnitude of the effect size (Cohen's d) was calculated for differences between patients and subjects, sitting or lying supine for testing, the parts of the VA insonated, and the changes recorded after cervical spine rotation. From this meta-analysis, VA blood flow velocity was found to be compromised more in patients than healthy individuals, on contralateral rotation, with the subject sitting, and more in the intracranial compared to the cervical part of the VA. Possible reasons for these findings are suggested, and it is advised that sustained end-of-range rotation and quick-thrust rotational manipulations be avoided until there is a stronger evidence base for clinical practice.     

Management and Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorders: A Clinical Perspective

Abstract

A temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is a very common problem affecting up to 33% of individuals within their lifetime. TMD is often viewed as a repetitive motion disorder of the masticatory structures and has many similarities to musculoskeletal disorders of other parts of the body. Treatment often involves similar principles as other regions as well. However, patients with TMD and concurrent cervical pain exhibit a complex symptomatic behavior that is more challenging than isolated TMD symptoms. Although routinely managed by medical and dental practitioners, TMD may be more effectively cared for when physical therapists are involved in the treatment process. Hence, a listing of situations when practitioners should consider referring TMD patients to a physical therapist can be provided to the practitioners in each physical therapist's region. This paper should assist physical therapists with evaluating, treating, insurance billing, and obtaining referrals for TMD patients.     

Physical exercise and therapy in terminally ill cancer patients: a retrospective feasibility analysis

Purpose

Physical exercise (PE) and/or therapy (PT) shows beneficial effects in advanced cancer patients and is increasingly implemented in hospice and palliative care, although systematic data are rare. This retrospective study systematically evaluated the feasibility of PE/PT in terminally ill cancer patients and of different modalities in correspondence to socio-demographic and disease- and care-related aspects.

Methods

All consecutive terminally ill cancer patients treated in a palliative care inpatient ward during a 3.5-year period were included. The modalities were chosen according to the therapists' and patients' appraisal of current performance status and symptoms.

Results

PE/PT were offered to 572 terminally ill cancer patients, whereof 528 patients (92 %) were able to perform at least one PE/PT unit (average 4.2 units/patient). The most frequently feasible modalities were physical exercises in 50 %, relaxation therapy in 22 %, breathing training in 10 %, and positioning and lymph edema treatment in 6 % each. Physical exercise and positioning treatment were performed significantly more often in older patients (p?=?0.009 and p?=?0.022, respectively), while relaxation (p?=?0.05) and lymph edema treatment (p?=?0.001) were used more frequently in younger. Breathing training was most frequently performed in head and neck cancer (p?=?0.002) and lung cancer (p?=?0.026), positioning treatment in brain tumor patients (p?=?0.021), and lymph edema treatment in sarcoma patients (p?=?0.012).

Conclusions

PE/PT were feasible in >90 % of terminally ill cancer patients to whom PE/PT had been offered. Physical exercises, relaxation therapy, and breathing training were the most frequently applicable methods. Prospective trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of specific PE/PT programs in terminally ill cancer patients.     

Manipulation in the Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain

Abstract

Study Design. This prospective research project statistically analyses the difference between two randomized groups of patients, one receiving manipulation plus exercises for acute low back pain of mechanical origin, the other receiving an exercise program alone. Objectives. To determine if orthopaedic manipulation is beneficial in treating acute low back pain of mechanical origin. Summary of Background Data. Orthopaedic manipulative physiotherapists have frequently observed dramatic results including elimination of pain and restoration of pain-free range of movement following manipulation of the acute locked back. Spinal manipulative therapy is a widely used method of treating lower back pain with millions of patient treatments performed each year, the majority in Western societies. Trials have emphasized the immediate and short-term symptomatic relief of low back pain following manipulation; however, the longterm difference in effects between manipulated and control groups has required further evaluation. Methods. A sample of convenience of acute low back pain participants were randomly assigned to two groups. A pre-test/post-test experimental design approach was used with 29 participants. This design included three dependent variables (pain, range of movement, and disability assessment) and one independent variable (15 participants in Group I received an exercise program with manipulation and 14 participants in Group II received an exercise program only). Participants were assessed for pain, range of movement, and disability before treatment. Participants were reassessed weekly for four weeks, then at two months and three months after initiation of treatment. Results. The findings of this study illustrate a statistically significant difference between the two treatments (p = <0.0005). Univariate post hoc tests concluded that the two treatment regimens had significantly different effects at three months on disability (p = 0.001), pain (p = <0.0005), and ROM (p = <0.0005). As well as being statistically significant, the magnitude of the relationships was strong, with 42.8% of the variability attributed to the disability measure, 64.3% of the variability attributed to the pain measure, and 65.9% of the variability attributed to the ROM measure. Conclusion. Patients who receive orthopaedic manipulation with an exercise program for acute low back pain of mechanical origin are likely to improve more than patients who receive an exercise program alone.     

Preliminary development of a clinical prediction rule for determining which patients with low back pain will respond to a stabilization exercise program

OBJECTIVE: To develop a clinical prediction rule to predict treatment response to a stabilization exercise program for patients with low back pain (LBP). DESIGN: A prospective, cohort study of patients with nonradicular LBP referred to physical therapy (PT). SETTING: Outpatient PT clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-four patients with nonradicular LBP. INTERVENTION: A standardized stabilization exercise program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Treatment response (success or failure) was categorized based on changes in the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire scores after 8 weeks. RESULTS: Eighteen subjects were categorized as treatment successes, 15 as treatment failures, and 21 as somewhat improved. After using regression analyses to determine the association between standardized examination variables and treatment response status, preliminary clinical prediction rules were developed for predicting success (positive likelihood ratio [LR], 4.0) and failure (negative LR, .18). The most important variables were age, straight-leg raise, prone instability test, aberrant motions, lumbar hypermobility, and fear-avoidance beliefs. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that the response to a stabilization exercise program in patients with LBP can be predicted from variables collected from the clinical examination. The prediction rules could be used to determine whether patients with LBP are likely to benefit from stabilization exercises.     

Self-Criticism and Dependency in Depressed Patients Treated with Cognitive Therapy or Pharmacotherapy

The current study aimed to assess the role of self-criticism and dependency in response to cognitive therapy (CT) or pharmacotherapy (PT). It was hypothesized that (a) self-criticism would moderate treatment outcome to CT and PT, and (b) the degree of change in self-criticism and the relationship of this change to treatment response would be greater for patients treated with CT than for patients treated with PT. A sample of outpatients with unipolar major depression received either CT (n = 51) or PT (n = 58). Neither pretreatment self-criticism and dependency scores nor self-criticism and dependency change scores were found to predict response to PT. Treatment response to CT, however, was associated with pretreatment self-criticism scores and pre- and post-self-criticism change scores. Although highly self-critical patients were more likely to have a poor response to CT, the degree to which self-criticism was successfully reduced in treatment was shown to be the best predictor of treatment response to CT.     

Manual Therapy and Cervical Arterial Dysfunction,Directions for the Future: A Clinical Perspective

Abstract

This paper offers a contemporary, evidence-based perspective on the issue of adverse neurovascular events related to cervical spine manual therapy. The purpose of this perspective is to challenge traditional thought and practice and to recognize areas where practice and research should develop. By considering the themes presented in this paper, the clinician can broaden his or her approach to neurovascular assessment in line with contemporary evidence and thought. We present information based on clinically relevant questions. The nature of vertebrobasilar insufficiency and the utility of pretreatment testing are examined in light of contemporary evidence. In addition, were porton internal carotid artery pathology, and the significance of appreciating a therosclerosis in clinical decision-making. These later two areas are not commonly recognized within manual therapy literature, and we suggest that their importance to differential diagnosis of head and neck pain, as well as estimating treatment related risk, is paramount. We propose that the term cervical arterial dysfunction is more appropriate than classically used nomenclature. This term refers more accurately and completely to the range of pathologies at different anatomical sites that manual therapists treating patients with head and neck pain are likely to encounter. Finally, we present a brief review of the medico-legal status pertaining to this area. Although this is English law-related, the themes derived from this section are of interest to all manual therapists.