Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole plus Amikacin as First-Line Therapy and Imipenem/Cilastatin as Second Empirical Therapy in Febrile Neutropenic Patients with Hematological Disorders

One hundred and thirty-nine consecutive episodes of fever were evaluated in 55 patients with hematological disorders during persistent neutropenia. In 121 instances, patients were given trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole + amikacin (TMP/SMZ + AMI) as an initial antibiotic regimen with clinical success in 51% (i.e. antibiotic treatment was not changed within the first 7 days).

Imipenem/cilastatin (I/C) therapy was instituted in: (a) 22 episodes with clinical failure and fever of unknown origin during TMP/SMZ + AMI therapy and (b) 18 episodes with a second fever episode during initially successful TMP/SMZ + AMI therapy. The response rate for all 40 I/C treated episodes was 80%. One neutropenic patient in the whole series died from infectious complications within four weeks from institution of therapy.

TMP/SMZ + AMI seems to be a safe and inexpensive «standard» antibiotic regimen in neutropenic patients. I/C appears to have good efficacy when used as secondary therapy after failure with TMP/SMZ + AMI.     

Cefepime monotherapy as an empirical initial treatment of patients with febrile neutropenia

Currently, monotherapy is considered a valid alternative to the combination antibiotic treatments used for initial, empirical management of febrile neutropenia. The advent of new cephalosporins warrants assessment. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of cefepime monotherapy in the treatment of cancer patients with febrile granulocytopenia (< 1000 leukocytes/muL and/or < 500 neutrophils/muL). A prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized trial was conducted. Initial treatment consisted of iv cefepime, 2 g every 8 h. If the patient was still febrile after 72 h, amikacin, vancomycin/teicoplanin, and amphotericin B were added sequentially. Response was evaluated according to EORTC criteria. One hundred twenty episodes were analyzed in 81 males and 39 females (median age, 52 yr; range, 15-83). The median leukocyte count at the time of diagnosis was 781 microL(-1) (range, 100-2600) and the median neutrophil count was 173 microL(-1) (range 0-500). The median duration of neutropenia (< 1000 neutrophils/microL) was 4.8 d (range, 3-20). Fifty-two episodes (44%) were confirmed microbiologically (42 presented as bacteremia), 31 with Gram-positive bacteria and 21 with Gram-negative bacteria, 47 (39.3%) were confirmed clinically, 16 (13.3%) were considered as probable infections, and 5 (4.2%) as doubtful infections. Protocol success was achieved in 110 episodes (91.7%), 8 (6.6%) were treatment failures, and 2 (1.7%) were not evaluable. Ninety-nine episodes (83.3%) were controlled with cefepime monotherapy, with 19 other episodes requiring additional antibiotics: amikacin in 7 (5.8%), amikacin + vancomycin/teicoplanin in 12 (10.1%). Three patients (2,5%) died during an episode of neutropenic fever. Cefepime is effective as an initial, empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia. The early addition of amikacin and/or vancomycin resolves most of the monotherapy failures, which seem somewhat lower than with other monotherapies.     

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole plus amikacin as first-line therapy and imipenem/cilastatin as second empirical therapy in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological disorders.

One hundred and thirty-nine consecutive episodes of fever were evaluated in 55 patients with hematological disorders during persistent neutropenia. In 121 instances, patients were given trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole + amikacin (TMP/SMZ + AMI) as an initial antibiotic regimen with clinical success in 51% (i.e. antibiotic treatment was not changed within the first 7 days). Imipenem/cilastatin (I/C) therapy was instituted in: (a) 22 episodes with clinical failure and fever of unknown origin during TMP/SMZ + AMI therapy and (b) 18 episodes with a second fever episode during initially successful TMP/SMZ + AMI therapy. The response rate for all 40 I/C treated episodes was 80%. One neutropenic patient in the whole series died from infectious complications within four weeks from institution of therapy. TMP/SMZ+AMI seems to be a safe and inexpensive "standard" antibiotic regimen in neutropenic patients. I/C appears to have good efficacy when used as secondary therapy after failure with TMP/SMZ+AMI.     

Cost-Effectiveness of Cefepime + Netilmicin or Ceftazidime + Amikacin or Meropenem Monotherapy in Febrile Neutropenic Children with Malignancy in Turkey

Abstract

Infection remains the major cause of morbidity and mortality in immuno-compromised children with malignancy. In addition, the economic impact of antibiotic treatment should always be evaluated, especially in developing countries. In our center between January 1998 and January 1999, 73 children with hematological malignancies [acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML)]; 9 children with solid tumors (rhabdomyosarcoma, neuroblas-toma) had 87 febrile neutropenic episodes (related to chemotherapy). These children were randomized prospectively into three treatment groups. The first group (n: 28) received cefepime plus netilmicin, while the second group (n: 29) was treated with ceftazidime plus amikacin and the third (n: 30) with meropenem as monotherapy. The aim of the study was to compare the success rates and cost of fourth generation cephalosporin plus aminoglycoside and monotherapy of meropenem with ceftazidime plus amikacin, which is the standard therapy for febrile neutropenia. Microbiologically documented infections were 29.9%, clinically documented infections were 9.2% and 60.9% of the febrile neutropenic episodes were considered to be FUO. Gram-positive microorganisms were the most commonly isolated agents from blood cultures [MRSA (Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus) in 6 patients and MSSA (Methicillin Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus) in 4 patients]. The success rates were 78.5%, 79.3% and 73.3 % for the 1^st, 2^nd and 3^rd groups respectively. In 4 patients (4.5%) fever responded only to amphotericin-B therapy. There was no statistically significant difference between the three treatment regimens with respect to efficacy, safety and tolerance (x²

test, p>0.05), but while the third and fourth generation cephalosporins + aminoglycosides were comparable for cost, the monotherapy regimen was the most expensive. The main determining factors for the choice of treatment of febrile neutropenic children, especially in a developing country, are cost, presence of indwelling catheter and the bacterial flora of the unit, as well as efficacy.     

A Prospective,Open-Label Noncomparative Study with Piperacillin-Tazobactam Monotherapy as Management of Fever in Patients with Acute Leukemia

Abstract

We evaluated the efficacy of piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy as empiric therapy of fever in acute leukemia patients in a total of 80 consecutive febrile episodes. The overall success rate was 75% with success without modification in 34% (afebrile at 72 h) and an overall death rate of 10%. No significant differences were seen in correlation between clinical outcome and phases of underlying disease. The success without modification was higher in patients with fever of unknown origin (FUO) than in those with documented infections (47% and 25% respectively). There were no significant differences in correlations between clinical response and degree of neutropenia. Our study suggests that empirical first-line monotherapy with piperacillin-tazobactam may be a reasonable option in patients with acute leukaemia, although in documented infections the response is frequently inadequate.     

An Open Evaluation of Triple Antibiotic Therapy Including Vancomycin for Febrile Bone Marrow Transplant Recipients with Severe Neutropenia

Abstract

Infectious complications still represent a major problem in patients submitted to bone marrow transplant (BMT); approximately 40% of febrile episodes are associated with infection and one-third of these are bacteremias. Opinions about the best appropriate empiric regimens are based on evaluation of cost, potential for adverse side-effects, development of bacterial resistance, prevalent nosocomial infections.

In order to assess the clinical and microbiological effectiveness of an aggressive approach, we performed a prospective open study in 72 neutropenic febrile BMT patients, employing a triple antibiotic association including amikacin 500mg x 8h, ceftazidime 2g x 8h, vancomycin 500mg x 8h as first-line empiric treatment. For the purpose of this study, a lasting return of temperature to normal and complete disappearance of either clinical or bacteriological signs of infection without any modification of therapy was considered as success; the persistence of fever after 72 hours or a protocol change was considered as failure. Eighty episodes were enrolled during the course of the study; bacteriological evidence of infection was obtained in 23 (28.7%) febrile episodes. Median duration of antibiotic administration and of febrile episodes were 5 and 2 days respectively. Overall response rate based on clinical responses was 87% and 91% in microbiological documented infections. Death due to sepsis nor toxicity were observed. This triple antibiotic combination appears to be a very effective regimen for the empiric treatment of febrile episodes in severely neutropenic BMT recipients.     

A rescue therapy with a combination of caspofungin and liposomal amphotericin B or voriconazole in children with haematological malignancy and refractory invasive fungal infections

Combination treatment of paediatric invasive fungal infections (IFIs) has rarely been reported. A total of 17 children with 19 IFI episodes were enrolled in the study. The median age of the patients was 5.3 (range 0.5–17) years. IFI was classified as proven in 4, probable in 12 and possible in 3 episodes. These patients received empiric antifungal treatment, which consisted of liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) monotherapy for a median duration of 12 days (range 3–69 days). All patients were refractory to LAmB; therefore, caspofungin was added to the therapy in 11 patients. In the remaining six patients, LAmB was ceased and a combination of caspofungin and voriconazole was started. Among the patients who received caspofungin + LAmB, four did not show favourable response and the combination was switched to caspofungin + voriconazole. The median (range) and total duration of the therapy were 7 (3–14) days and 91 patient days for LAmB + caspofungin combination and 49 (7–126) days and 516 patient days for caspofungin + voriconazole combination. We found a favourable response rate of 68.4% in 16 proven or probable IFI episodes. Twelve‐week survival rate of these patients was 75%. No serious side effect was observed among the patients. Our data suggest that combination antifungal therapy is safe and effective in children with haematological malignancies.     

Ceftriaxone plus Amikacin in a Single Daily Dose as Empiric Antibiotic Therapy in Granulocytopenic Patients

Summary

In our study ceftriaxone plus amikacin were employed as empirical antibiotic therapy. This antibiotic treatment allows for a once daily administration and has a broad spectrum of activity. 21 febrile episodes were treated with an antibiotic regimen of ceftriaxone 50 mg/kg/day and amikacin 30-35 mg/kg/day i.v. An earlier pilot study was carried out in which 47 febrile episodes were treated with an antibiotic regimen of ceftriaxone 80-100 mg/kg/day i.v. and amikacin 30-35 mg/kg/day i.v. in a single dose.

The overall response rate was 76% (16/21) and 79% (37/47) for the pilot study.

During the treatment no side effects were observed and aminoglycoside related toxicity did not occur.

In conclusion, this empiric antibiotic therapy gives a high response rate and allows for a single daily administration.     

Meropenem Versus Piperacillin-Tazobactam as Empiric Therapy for Febrile Neutropenia in Pediatric Oncology Patients

Background: Infection is a serious cause of mortality in febrile neutropenia of pediatric cancer patients.Recently, monotherapy has replaced the combination therapy in empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia.Since there has been no reported trial comparing the efficacy of meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam (PIP/TAZ) monotherapies, the present retrospective study was conducted to compare safety and efficacy in febrileneutropenic children with cancer. Materials and Methods: Charts of febrile, neutropenic children hospitalizedat our center between March 2008 and April 2011 for hemato-oncological malignancies were reviewed. Patientsreceived PIP/TAZ 360 mg/kg/day or meropenem 60 mg/kg/day intravenously in three divided doses. Durationof fever and neutropenia, absolute neutrophil count, modification, and success rate were compared between thetwo groups. Resolution of fever without antibiotic change was defined as success and resolution of fever withantibiotic change or death of a patient was defined as failure. Modification was defined as changing the empiricalantimicrobial agent during a febrile episode. Results: Two hundred eighty four febrile neutropenic episodes weredocumented in 136 patients with a median age of 5 years. In 198 episodes meropenem and in 86 episodes PIP/TAZ were used. Duration of fever and neutropenia, neutrophil count, sex, and primary disease were not differentbetween two groups. Success rates and modification rate between two groups showed no significant differences(p>0.05). Overall success rate in the meropenem and PIP/TAZ groups were 92.4% and 91.9% respectively. Noserious adverse effects occurred in either of the groups. Conclusions: Meropenem and PIP/TAZ monotherapyare equally safe and effective in the initial treatment of febrile neutropenia in children with cancer.     

Ceftriaxone as a Single Agent in Empirical Therapy of Unexplained Fever in Granulocytopenic Children with Solid Tumors

Abstract

The optimal management of fever in granulocytopenic cancer patients remains controversial. Antibiotic monotherapy is increasingly an option for the initial empiric treatment of febrile granulocytopenic patients with solid tumors. Available data show that response to empiric therapy is often more related to disease classification (solid tumors vs. acute leukemia) than to the regimen used. In this study we based empiric monotherapy on the underlying disease (solid tumors) in treating 33 episodes of fever in 26 granulocytopenic children with cancer. We investigated the potential effectiveness of single daily doses of ceftriaxone administered empirically in febrile granulocytopenic children with solid tumors. Fever was treated successfully with ceftriaxone monotherapy in 91% (30/33) of febrile episodes. None of the patients died as a result of primary infection. These results suggest that empirical monotherapy with once-daily ceftriaxone is safe and effective. In addition, when compared with other extended-spectrum cephalosporins such as ceftazidime, once-daily administration of ceftriaxone reduces cost and patient inconvenience, allowing convenient parenteral therapy even on an outpatient basis.     

Review of comparative studies between conventional and liposomal amphotericin B (Ambisome) in neutropenic patients with fever of unknown origin and patients with systemic mycosis

Fungal infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Treatment with amphotericin B is the main therapeutic approach. However, this treatment is limited by the substantial toxicity. We present the data of the first randomized prospective comparative trial in adults (134 patients with fever of unknown origin) with conventional amphotericin B and a liposomal formulation of amphotericin B (AmBisome, published in 1997 by Prentice et al. (Br. J. Haematol. 98, 711-718) and the data of adults with documented fungal infections (59 patients), treated in this trial. Patients received either conventional amphotericin B 1 mg kg-1 per day, liposomal amphotericin B 1 mg kg-1 per day or liposomal amphotericin B 3 mg kg-1 per day. Patients were entered if they had fever of unknown origin (FUO), defined as temperature of 38 degrees C or more, not responding to 96 h of systemic broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment, and neutropenia (< 0.5 x 10(9) l-1). Efficacy of treatment was assessed, with success defined as resolution of fever for three consecutive days (< 38 degrees C) in the group of patients with FUO and the freedom of clinical signs and/or the elimination of fungus in the group of patients with documented fungal infections. The safety of treatment and renal and hepatic toxicity of liposomal and conventional amphotericin B were compared. No statistically significant difference was found in the treatment efficacy in the three study arms. However, there is a tendency of better treatment results in the two groups of patients, who received liposomal amphotericin B. Thirty-five per cent of patients with documented fungal infections and 46% of patients with FUO responded to amphotericin B. In the patients group, that received 1 mg kg-1 liposomal amphotericin B it was 63 and 49%, in the group of patients that received 3 mg kg-1 liposomal amphotericin B it was 47 and 64%. Evidence of toxicity due to amphotericin B was seen in 50 patients (83%), toxicity due to liposomal amphotericin B, 1 mg kg-1, was seen in 35 patients (50%), and due to liposomal amphotericin B 3 mg kg-1 in 34 patients (54%). This was a statistically significant difference (P = 0.001). It was concluded that liposomal amphotericin B was safer than conventional amphotericin B, but both formulations are equivalent in treatment efficacy. The prophylactic use of amphotericin B in these immunocompromised patients is discussed.     

Evaluation of imipenem 1.5 g daily in febrile patients with short duration neutropenia after chemotherapy for non-leukemic hematologic malignancies and solid tumors: personal experience and review of the literature

Numerous studies have demonstrated efficacy of imipenem-cilastatin, 50 mg/kg/day, as first line therapy in febrile patients with neutropenia of short duration consecutive to cytostatic chemotherapy. However, only two studies used low dosage of this antibiotic as 1.5 g/day, in prospective, double blind, randomized clinical trials, in this indication. Efficacy and tolerability of imipenem-cilastatin 0.5 g three times daily IV in 30-min infusions, as first-line empiric therapy, were retrospectively evaluated in our hematological unit. From January 1996 to September 2000, 30 neutropenic patients (12 females) with 45 febrile episodes were included. Median age was 57.5 years (31-75). Twenty-four of them had lymphomas, 4 solid tumors and 2 myelomas. There were 13 clinically documented infections, (CD, 28.8%), 16 microbiologically documented infections, (MD, 35.6%) and 16 febrile episodes corresponding to fever of unknown origin, (FUO, 35.6%). The median neutrophils count on nadir ( n =44), was 67/mm 3 (8-369). The median duration of neutropenia was 5 days (3-15). Bacteremia was observed in 10 patients, urinary tract infection in 3 patients. The most frequently isolated microorganism was Escherichia coli . The overall success rate of the first line therapy was 66.7%. Adverse events were observed in 11.1% of the patients without necessity to stop treatment. The MD infections showed a lower rate of success compared with CD infections and FUO. These data were in accordance with the previous studies. The importance of number of microorganisms ( p =0.007) and of infected sites ( p =0.01) appeared as prognostic factors (univariate analysis). Although imipenem-cilastatin has been used in numerous studies as empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy in the treatment of febrile neutropenic cancer patients, the exact dosage of this antibiotic is still not standardized. However, utilization of this antibiotic in monotherapy at low dosage seems to us to be safe and effective as usual dosage in the antimicrobial treatment of the febrile patients with post chemotherapy neutropenia of short duration.     

Ceftaroline fosamil and treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: CAPTURE study experience

Abstract

The Clinical Assessment Program and TEFLARO Utilization Registry (CAPTURE) is a multicentre retrospective cohort study in the USA describing treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) with ceftaroline fosamil (CPT-F). Charts for review were chosen by random selection. Among 647 evaluable patients, 52% were obese, 46% had diabetes mellitus (DM), and 19% had peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was recovered in 28% and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), 11%. Antibiotics were administered prior to CPT-F treatment in 80%, and concurrently in 39%. Clinical success overall was 85%; in patients with DM, 83%; with PVD, 76%; and in obese patients, 88%. Clinical success was ≧ 79% across all infection types; 81% for MRSA and 83% for MSSA; and 86% for ceftaroline monotherapy and 84% for concurrent therapy. These high clinical success rates support CPT-F as an effective treatment option for ABSSSI, including infections due to MRSA and patients with significant co-morbidities.     

Interferon Alpha Monotherapy for Chronic Hepatitis C Viral Infection in Thalassemics and Hemodialysis Patients

Abstract

We assessed the effectiveness of interferon (IFN) monotherapy in thalassemic or hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection. Ten thalassemic and four hemodialysis patients were included in the study. Chronic HCV was confirmed with both serum HCV-RNA and liver histopathology. IFN alpha-2a was administered three times a week for 24-48 weeks, at a dose of 5 MU/m² (maximum 6 million units). Sustained response was defined as negative HCV-RNA at least 24 weeks after termination of the treatment. All patients completed the study. Eight of 10 thalassemic (80%) and one of four hemodialysis patients (25%) showed a sustained response. IFN monotherapy proved to be an effective treatment, especially in thalassemic patients with chronic HCV. IFN monotherapy seems reasonable for patients with thalassemia and chronic hepatitis C virus in whom ribavirin cannot be used.     

Cost-effectiveness of cefepime + netilmicin or ceftazidime + amikacin or meropenem monotherapy in febrile neutropenic children with malignancy in Turkey.

Infection remains the major cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised children with malignancy. In addition, the economic impact of antibiotic treatment should always be evaluated, especially in developing countries. In our center between January 1998 and January 1999, 73 children with hematological malignancies [acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML)]; 9 children with solid tumors (rhabdomyosarcoma, neuroblastoma) had 87 febrile neutropenic episodes (related to chemotherapy). These children were randomized prospectively into three treatment groups. The first group (n: 28) received cefepime plus netilmicin, while the second group (n: 29) was treated with ceftazidime plus amikacin and the third (n: 30) with meropenem as monotherapy. The aim of the study was to compare the success rates and cost of fourth generation cephalosporin plus aminoglycoside and monotherapy of meropenem with ceftazidime plus amikacin, which is the standard therapy for febrile neutropenia. Microbiologically documented infections were 29.9%, clinically documented infections were 9.2% and 60.9% of the febrile neutropenic episodes were considered to be FUO. Gram-positive microorganisms were the most commonly isolated agents from blood cultures [MRSA (Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus) in 6 patients and MSSA (Methicillin Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus) in 4 patients]. The success rates were 78.5%, 79.3% and 73.3 % for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd groups respectively. In 4 patients (4.5%) fever responded only to amphotericin-B therapy. There was no statistically significant difference between the three treatment regimens with respect to efficacy, safety and tolerance (chi2 test, p>0.05), but while the third and fourth generation cephalosporins + aminoglycosides were comparable for cost, the monotherapy regimen was the most expensive. The main determining factors for the choice of treatment of febrile neutropenic children, especially in a developing country, are cost, presence of indwelling catheter and the bacterial flora of the unit, as well as efficacy.     

Risk-adapted approach for fever and neutropenia in paediatric cancer patients – A national multicentre study

BackgroundIn this national multicentre study, we examined the safety of reducing antibiotics in selected paediatric cancer patients with febrile neutropenia.MethodsPatients with signs of a bacterial infection and/or abnormal vital signs indicating sepsis were considered high risk and received antibiotic therapy. Remaining patients were allocated to low- or medium risk, depending on their interleukin-8 level. Low-risk patients did not receive any antibiotics and were discharged from the hospital after having been afebrile for 12 h. Medium-risk patients were re-evaluated after 72 h of antibiotic treatment and, in selected patients, antibiotics were stopped.ResultsTwo hundred thirty-three febrile neutropenic episodes in 141 paediatric cancer patients were included in the study. Sixty-four episodes were classified high risk (28%), 122 medium risk (52%), and 47 (20%) low risk. In the medium-risk group, antibiotics were stopped after 72 h in 50 in 122 episodes (41%). Median duration of antibiotic treatment and hospital admission was significantly lower in low- and medium-risk episodes with early discharge. No failures were observed in the medium-risk group with early discharge. In the low-risk group, six failures were observed (12.8%), due to coagulase-negative staphylococci-positive blood cultures and recurrent fever.ConclusionWe showed that it is safe to shorten antibiotic treatment to 72 h in selected medium-risk patients with febrile neutropenia, regardless of the neutrophil count. The safety of withholding antibiotics in selected low-risk paediatric cancer patients with febrile neutropenia requires further investigation, using more suitable definitions for safety. Reduction in hospital admissions allows children with cancer more time at home and consequently improves their quality of life.     

Antibiotic Treatment is an Independent Poor Risk Factor in NSCLC But Not in Melanoma Patients Who had Received Anti-PD-1/L1 Monotherapy

BackgroundAntibiotic treatment may reduce the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy by disrupting gut microbiome. We aimed to study the association of antibiotics and survival outcomes in advanced cutaneous melanoma and non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who had received anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy.Patients and MethodsA total of 222 melanoma and 199 NSCLC patients had received anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy in 5 Finnish hospitals between January 2014 and December 2020. Clinical characteristics, antibiotic and corticosteroid treatment, and survival outcomes were retrospectively collected from hospital and national medical records.ResultsThere were 32% of melanoma and 31% of NSCLC patients who had received antibiotic treatment (ABT) 3 months before to 1 month after the first anti-PD-1/L1 antibody infusion. In survival analyses, early antibiotic treatment was associated with inferior overall survival (OS) (ABT 19.2 [17.6-43.7] vs. no ABT 35.6 [29.3-NA] months, P = .033) but not with inferior progression-free survival (PFS) (ABT 5.8 [3.0-12.6] vs. no ABT 10.2 [7.7-15.3] months, P = .3) in melanoma patients and with inferior OS (ABT 8.6 [6.4-12.3] vs. no ABT 18.5 [15.1-21.6] months, P < .001) and PFS (ABT 2.8 [2.1-4.5] vs. no ABT 5.6 [4.4-8.0] months, P = .0081) in NSCLC patients. In multivariable analyses, ABT was not an independent risk-factor for inferior OS and PFS in melanoma but was associated with inferior OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.12 [1.37-3.28]) and PFS (HR 1.65 [1.10-2.47]) in NSCLC after adjusted for other risk factors.ConclusionsEarly ABT was an independent poor risk factor in NSCLC patients who had received anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy but not in melanoma patients. The weight of ABT as a poor risk factor might depend on other prognostic factors in different cancers.     

Incidence and Management of Proven and Probable Fungal Infections in Patients with Acute Leukemia: A Single Center Experience

Abstract

The incidence of fungal infections and the role of liposomal amphotericin B (Ambisome) in proven and probable infections were evaluated in acute leukemic patients, intolerant to conventional amphotericin B. During 1999-2002, 307 febrile episodes occurred in 231 patients. Fungi were responsible for 3% of bloodstream infections. Ambisome was employed in 5 fungal sepsis (1 Candida albicans, 1 C. famata, 1 C. tropicalis, 1 C. krusei, 1 Geotrichum capitatum) 2 Aspergillosis, 2 probable fungal pneumonia cases. A favorable response was achieved in 78% of patients (4 fungemia, 2 aspergillosis, 1 probable), an unfavorable response in 1 C. krusei fungemia and in 1 probable pneumonia. Our antimicrobial pattern docu-mented a high resistance rate to azoles. We concluded that Ambisome is an effec-tive and well tolerated agent and its introduction has changed the outcome for many patients, although in some refractory diseases other strategies must be con-sidered.     

Successful introduction and audit of a step-down oral antibiotic strategy for low risk paediatric febrile neutropaenia in a UK, multicentre, shared care setting

PurposePatients with febrile neutropaenia (FN) can be stratified according to their risk of significant complications, allowing reduced intensity therapy for low risk (LR) episodes. Serious events are very rare in low risk episodes making randomised trials difficult. Introduction of new evidence-based guidelines followed by re-auditing of the outcome is an alternative strategy.MethodsNew guidelines for the management of LR FN were implemented in 4 specialist paediatric oncology centres (POCs) and in their associated shared care units (POSCUs). All patients commenced empirical intravenous antibiotic therapy and after 48 h those with blood culture negative episodes designated LR were eligible for discharge on oral co-amoxiclav. Prospective data collection on FN episodes in all treatment centres was undertaken over a 1-year period.ResultsSeven hundred and sixty two eligible episodes of FN were recorded in 368 patients; 213 episodes were initiated in POCs and 549 episodes were initiated in POSCUs. In 40% of episodes no clinical or microbiological focus of infection was found. At 48 h, 212 (27%) episodes were classified as LR and 143 of these (19%) were managed on the LR protocol. There was a low hospital readmission rate (8/143 episodes; 5.6%), no intensive care admissions and no deaths in LR episodes. Almost all LR episodes (209/212) occurred in the shared care setting.ConclusionsRapid step-down to oral antibiotics was a feasible and safe management strategy for LR FN in the shared care setting in England.     

Fiebre y neutropenia en niños con cáncer: evaluación de un protocolo terapéutico con monoterapia

Background

Traditionally, fever and neutropenia in cancer patients has been managed with an association of two or more antibiotics. In recent years, monotherapy has emerged as an adequate option. We began a new empirical antibiotic protocol in 2001, including monotherapy as initial treatment for a selected group of patients.

Results

Forty seven patients had 98 fever and neutropenia episodes and 97 were included in the protocol. Leukemia and lymphomas were the most common underlying diagnosis. In most cases, no infection focus was found. In comparison with our previous series, we found an increment in gramnegative sepsis incidence and the disappearance ofStaphylococcus epidermidis as an etiological agent. Initial treatment according to protocol was not modified in 69/97 (71,2%) and 48/67 (71,6%) were treated with monotherapy. Only 5/97 patients were readmitted and finished treatment in the hospital without any further complications.

Conclusion

In conclusion we managed to treat our patients effectively and safely, with early discharge from the hospital.