Weekly vinorelbine and docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy for pretreated non-small cell lung cancer patients: a phase I-II trial

Docetaxel was proven to be effective as second-line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC after failure of platinum-based front-line chemotherapy. We designed this phase I/II study to define the Maximum Tolerated Dose of weekly docetaxel combined with weekly vinorelbine, and subsequently evaluate tolerability and activity of this schedule in NSCLC patients who were progressive after treatment with either cisplatin and gemcitabine or carboplatin and paclitaxel regimens. To be eligible for the study, patients were required to have a WHO performance status < or =2, failure after at least two cycles of first platinum-based chemotherapy, and no prior treatment with docetaxel and vinorelbine. A total of 27 patients were enrolled in this phase I/II study. A weekly docetaxel dose of 25 mg/m2 was recommended in combination with fixed vinorelbine dose of 20 mg/m2, and 24 patients were treated at this dose level. Severe neutropenia (62%) and febrile neutropenia (29%) were the most frequent toxicities, with 83% of patients requiring dose modification or delay. In the phase II study, 5 (21%) patients obtained a partial response, 8 (33%) patients had stable disease, whereas 10 (42%) patients progressed. After a median follow-up of 18.7 months, median survival was 8 months, with 30% surviving at 1 year. Regardless of the use of weekly docetaxel schedule, this regimen was highly myelosuppressive, and did not seem to improve response rate and survival compared to single-agent docetaxel. No further developments of this schedule are warranted.     

Phase I/II trial of docetaxel and vinorelbine in patients with non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy

We conducted a phase I/II trial of the combination of docetaxel and weekly vinorelbine in patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were refractory or resistant to platinum-based regimens. The objectives of the study were (1) to determine the maximum tolerated doses of docetaxel and weekly vinorelbine when given in combination and (2) to evaluate the response to and quantitative and qualitative toxicity of this combination of agents. Patients were required to have an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, evaluable lesions, and no prior treatment with docetaxel or vinorelbine. A total of 30 patients were treated on this phase I/II study. Eight patients were treated at various doses on the phase I portion of the study. Twenty-two patients (11 males, 11 females, median age 64.5 years) were treated at the phase II dose of vinorelbine 15 mg/m(2) weekly with docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 of a 21 day cycle. Twenty of these 22 patients enrolled at the phase II dose required dose modification or delay. Sixteen patients experienced absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <500/mm(3), and eight patients had neutropenic fever. Four patients experienced partial response (18%), nine patients had stable disease (41%), and nine patients had progressive disease (41%). With a median follow-up of 11 months, median survival for these 22 patients was 15.9 months (95% CI 8.1, 23.6 months). Median time to disease progression was 3.2 months with a 95% CI of (1.4, 4.1) months. Thus, the combination of docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks and vinorelbine 15 mg/m(2) weekly appears to be active as a second line regimen in NSCLC, although it is a highly myelosuppressive regimen requiring dose modification in 91% of patients.     

Challenging the platinum combinations in the chemotherapy of NSCLC

In previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) the combination of docetaxel and gemcitabine is active and well tolerated. In the phase II setting using a 3-week schedule, response rates (RR) ranged from 25 to 50%, and median survival from 11 to 13 months. Preliminary data with weekly and bi-weekly schedules indicate maintained efficacy while reducing the risk of neutropenia. A randomized phase III trial has shown that the combination of docetaxel and gemcitabine is as active as docetaxel plus cisplatin, achieving a 1-year survival rate of 39%, with significantly less neutropenia and gastro-intestinal toxicity. The combination of docetaxel with vinorelbine is equally active and the associated toxicities are manageable. In phase II studies the average response rate is 40%, and in one study using a 2-week schedule the 1-year survival rate was 60%. With this combination neutropenia is the commonest adverse event while clinically significant neuropathy is infrequent. In a randomized phase II trial, docetaxel plus cisplatin was compared to docetaxel plus irinotecan. The non-platinum doublet achieved comparable levels of activity, though with a different toxicity profile (more diarrhea but less nausea and vomiting). The combination of docetaxel with irinotecan and carboplatin has achieved 1-year survival of 55%. All three docetaxel combinations (gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and irinotecan) could provide a valuable alternative to platinum-based chemotherapy and should be further evaluated in phase III setting.     

Phase II study of docetaxel/vinorelbine in patients with non-small-cell-lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy

The aim of this phase II trial was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of docetaxel/vinorelbine as second-line therapy. Thirty-two patients with a performance status (PS) of 相似文献   

Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Carboplatin Plus Weekly Paclitaxel and Docetaxel Alone in Elderly Patients With Advanced Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer: North Japan Lung Cancer Group Trial 0801

Background.

Standard first-line chemotherapy for elderly non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has been monotherapy with vinorelbine or gemcitabine. Docetaxel has also been considered as an alternative option for the elderly population in Japan. We have previously demonstrated the high efficacy of carboplatin plus weekly paclitaxel for elderly NSCLC patients. Consequently, we conducted a randomized phase II study to select the proper regimen for a future phase III trial.

Methods.

Eligible patients were aged 70 years or older with newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC. Patients were randomly assigned either to a combination of carboplatin (area under the curve: 6 mg/mL per minute) with weekly paclitaxel (70 mg/m²) (CP regimen) or to single-agent docetaxel (60 mg/m²). The primary endpoint of this study was objective response rate. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity profile.

Results.

Among 83 eligible patients (41 to CP, 42 to docetaxel), the objective response rates were 54% (95% confidence interval: 39%–69%) and 24% (95% confidence interval: 11%–37%) and median progression-free survival was 6.6 months and 3.5 months in the CP arm and the docetaxel arm, respectively. Severe neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and nausea were significantly frequent in the docetaxel arm, whereas toxicities in the CP arm were generally moderate. One treatment-related death was observed in the docetaxel arm.

Conclusion.

The CP regimen achieved higher activity with less toxicity than single-agent docetaxel. Considering the results of this phase II trial and the IFCT-0501 trial, we have selected the CP regimen for a future phase III trial in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Phase I and II trials of vinorelbine with carboplatin for patients 75 years of age or older with previously untreated non-small-cell lung cancer

BackgroundThe safety and efficacy of platinum-based combination chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. We conducted phase I and phase II trials of a combination of vinorelbine and carboplatin for patients ≥75 years of age and with advanced NSCLC.Patients and MethodsPreviously untreated patients (≥75 years of age) with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were enrolled. Based on a 4-week cycle, vinorelbine was given on days 1 and 8, and carboplatin was given on day 1. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as grade 4 hematologic toxicity that lasted 4 days or more, febrile neutropenia; grade 3 or worse nonhematologic toxicities; or the omission of vinorelbine administration on day 8 in the first cycle.ResultsThirteen patients were enrolled in phase I. dose-limiting toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia that lasted 4 days or more, observed in 2 of 4 patients at level 4. Phase II study used the dose of level 3 (20 mg/m² vinorelbine, area under the curve of 4 mg/mL/min carboplatin). Forty-two patients were enrolled. The response rate was 14.6% of 41 assessable patients (95% CI, 3.8-25.4). The median time to progression was 98 days (95% CI, 61-135 days), and the median survival time was 366 days (95% CI, 321-411 days). All toxicities were mild and manageable.ConclusionUse of 20 mg/m² vinorelbine on days 1 and 8, followed by carboplatin area under the curve of 4 mg/mL/min on day 1 every 4 weeks warrants a phase III study for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Combination chemotherapy of S-1 and taxanes in Korea

Various combination treatments incorporating S-1 are undergoing clinical trials in Korea, especially combinations with taxane, oxaliplatin, or irinotecan. In a phase I study to estimate the maximum tolerated dose of docetaxel in combination with S-1 administered at a fixed dose of 40 mg/m² twice daily on days 1–14 of each 3-week cycle in patients with advanced gastric cancer, 60 mg/m² docetaxel was declared to be the maximum tolerated dose. A phase I/II study of the same schedule of combination chemotherapy with S-1 plus docetaxel reported doses of S-1/docetaxel of 40/75 mg/m² as the maximum tolerated dose. In a phase I study of S-1 plus weekly docetaxel, the patients received variable doses of docetaxel administered intravenously over 1 h on days 1 and 8 and S-1 administered on days 1–14 of each 3-week cycle. The maximum-tolerated doses of S-1 and docetaxel were determined to be 45 mg/m² and 35 mg/m² in this study. A phase I/II study of docetaxel plus S-1 combination chemotherapy from Korea reported a response rate of 43.3%. Also, a phase II study of paclitaxel plus S-1 as first-line therapy in patients with advanced or relapsed gastric cancer showed an overall response rate of 49%. The most frequent significant toxicities in combination chemotherapies with taxane plus S-1 were neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. However, nonhematological toxicities were mild to moderate. A taxane plus S-1 combination regimen could be a new standard regimen for advanced gastric cancer, given its significant activity and favorable toxicity pattern.     

Phase II non-randomized study of three different sequences of docetaxel and vinorelbine in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Docetaxel and vinorelbine as single agents and in combination with cisplatin have shown significant activity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Significant neutropenia has been observed with the combination of docetaxel/vinorelbine. To gain insight into the potential synergism of this combination, we examined three different sequences of docetaxel 75 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m(2), every 3 weeks, in locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC patients. About 14 patients were evaluable in each schedule: schedule A, docetaxel day 1, vinorelbine days 1 and 6; schedule B, docetaxel day 6, vinorelbine days 1 and 6; schedule C, docetaxel day 1, vinorelbine days 6 and 15. Response rates were: 42.8, 7.1 and 21.4% for schedules A, B and C, respectively (P=0.01, schedule A vs. B). Median survival time was 16, 6.5 and 10.6 months for schedules A, B and C, respectively (P=0.04, schedule A vs. B). Neutropenia was the commonest toxicity; 43% of patients in schedule A and 57% of patients in schedule B had a febrile neutropenia episode. Prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was prescribed in schedule C after the first episode of febrile neutropenia. Non-hematologic toxicities were mild in all three schedules. For future studies, schedule A with lower doses is recommended.     

Weekly docetaxel plus gemcitabine or vinorelbine in refractory advanced breast cancer patients: A parallel dose-finding study

Purpose:The objective of this study was to determine thedocetaxel MTD when combined with gemcitabine or vinorelbine in advanced breastcancer patients who had received previous anthracycline-based chemotherapy foradvanced disease. Patients and methods:Advanced breast cancer patients aged between18 and 70 with ECOG PS 0–2 who had not responded to, or had relapsedafter, first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy, were randomized to receiveeither gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² or vinorelbine 25 mg/m²in combination with escalating doses of docetaxel (starting from 30mg/m²), all on days 1 and 8 every three weeks. Escalation wasstopped if >33% of patients treated at a given dose level showed DLTat the first cycle. Results:A total of 34 patients with locally advanced (8) ormetastatic disease (26) were treated, for a total of 94 cycles delivered.Nineteen patients received docetaxel in combination with gemcitabine and 15with vinorelbine. All patients had been pretreated with anthracyclines, and24 of 34 had also received weekly dose-dense paclitaxel. A docetaxel dose of40/m² proved to be safe when combined on days 1 and 8 withgemcitabine, while a dose of 35 mg/m² was tolerated in combinationwith vinorelbine. Overall, nine episodes of DLT, all of them neutropenia,occurred at the first cycle. Considering all 94 cyles, grades 3 or 4neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 15 (44%), and 7(20%) patients. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild, except for threecases of grade 2 peripheral neuropathy. All patients were assessed forresponse on an 'intent-to-treat' basis. Overall, five partial responses wererecorded (docetaxel + gemcitabine = 3 and docetaxel + vinorelbine = 2), fora 15% (95% CI: 5%–31%) overall responserate. Only 1 of 24 (4%) patients who had received weekly dose-densepaclitaxel responded to treatment. Conclusions:The weekly docetaxel administration in combinationwith either gemcitabine or vinorelbine is a well-tolerated treatment forheavily pretreated advanced breast cancer patients. This approach, althoughsometimes capable of achieving a major response, does not seem advisable inadvanced breast cancer patients refractory to both anthracyclines andpaclitaxel.     

Phase I trial of weekly docetaxel with a 4-weekly cisplatin administration in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma

The docetaxel-cisplatin combination is active against several tumors including gastric cancer but it is followed by severe myelosuppression. Recent experience with weekly taxanes has demonstrated a mild myelotoxicity with high dose intensity. We investigated in a phase I study a weekly schedule of docetaxel on days 1, 8 and 15 and cisplatin on day 1 every 4 weeks in 19 patients with advanced gastric cancer with no prior chemotherapy. Cohorts of patients were treated with escalating doses of docetaxel (starting dose 30 mg/m² per week and increments of 10 mg/m² per week) and cisplatin (starting dose 70 mg/m² and increments of 5 mg/m²). Febrile neutropenia was the only dose-limiting event occurring in four (20%) patients; the dose-limiting toxicity was reached at dose level three (docetaxel 40 mg/m² per week and cisplatin 75 mg/m²). The maximum-tolerated dose was 40 mg/m² per week for docetaxel and 70 mg/m² every 4 weeks for cisplatin. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in six patients (30%); early death occurred in one patient with septic shock because of neutropenia and another with acute coronary ischemia. Two (11%) complete and two (11%) partial responses were documented (ORR 22%; 95% CI 3–39%), with a median response duration of 5 months and median time to progression of 7 months. In conclusion, the combination of weekly docetaxel plus cisplatin is feasible with moderate toxicity and merits further investigation in phase II studies in advanced gastric cancer.Presented as an abstract at the 15th International Congress on Anti-Cancer Treatment, Paris, 9–12 February 2004.     

Phase II trial of weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Background A platinum doublet has been the standard treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and good performance status. This treatment results in almost a doubling of 1-yr survival, along with an improvement in quality of life despite treatment-related toxicities. However, platinum-based treatment may be associated with significant toxicity. Materials and Methods In this trial, we prospectively evaluated a weekly regimen of docetaxel and gemcitabine for advanced NSCLC. The endpoints of this study included objective response rate, survival, and toxicity. Forty-two patients with previously untreated, advanced NSCLC with PS 0-1 were included. Patients received docetaxel (36 mg/m²) and gemcitabine (600 mg/m²) on d 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-d cycle. Responses were assessed every two cycles. The median age was 63 yr; with 22 males and 20 females; 67% were ≥60 years old; and 38 patients had stage IV disease. Results In the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis of response, 16 patients had a partial response (38%) and 15 patients had stable disease (36%). The 1-yr survival was 48%; median survival for all patients was 11.3 mo and the median progression-free survival was 5.1 mo. Toxicities (≥grade 3) included neutropenia (29%), asthenia (26%), diarrhea (14%), thrombocytopenia (10%), pneumonitis (7%), peripheral neuropathy (5%), peripheral edema (5%), nail changes (2%), and myositis (2%). Conclusions This study demonstrated that this non-platinum doublet (docetaxel+gemcitabine) given on a weekly schedule for advanced NSCLC was well tolerated with efficacy comparable to that reported with platinum-based chemotherapy regimens.     

Second-line chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with monthly docetaxel and weekly gemcitabine: A phase II trial

Background:Docetaxel and gemcitabine are active againstchemotherapy-pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose ofthis phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of monthlydocetaxel combined with weekly gemcitabine in NSCLC patients failing one priorregimen. Patients and methods:Forty patients were enrolled. Priorchemotherapy was a platinum-based combination in 36 patients, usingvinorelbine in 26 patients and etoposide in 10 patients. The other fourpatients had prior single agents. Tumors were refractory or resistant tofront-line therapy in 80% of patients. Treatment was gemcitabine 800mg/m² days 1, 8, 15 and docetaxel 100 mg/m² day 1, withcycles repeated every four weeks. Results:Thirteen patients responded (32.5%; 95%confidence interval (CI): 19%–49%), including one completeand 12 partial responses. Responses were observed at all metastatic sites,with similar response frequencies in platinum-sensitive andplatinum-resistant/refractory tumors. The median time to progression forresponders was nine months, with two responses lasting longer than a year.Median survival was 8.1 months. Hematologic toxicities included grade 4neutropenia in 23 patients, with 4 episodes of febrile neutropenia, grade3–4 thrombocytopenia in 9 patients, and anemia requiring red celltransfusions in 9 patients. With the exception of asthenia, severenon-hematologic toxicities were infrequent. Conclusions:Monthly docetaxel, combined with weekly gemcitabine,is an active and safe second-line therapy for NSCLC patients.     

Oral vinorelbine: Feasibility and safety profile

Background:Patient preference as well as concerns anddifficulties with intravenous access and pharmaco-economic issues havedriven the development of oral vinorelbine. Patients andmethods:Four phase II studies were conducted in chemotherapy-naivenon-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and as first-line chemotherapy ofadvanced breast cancer (ABC). As recommended in the phase I dose-findingstudy, the first step used a weekly dose of 80 mg/m². Thisregimen was associated with an excessive rate of early deaths(10%) due to complicated neutropenia and led to discontinuationof the first two studies. In a second step, the dose of 60mg/m²/week was given for the first three courses andsubsequently increased to 80 mg/m²/week, in the absence ofsevere neutropenia. Results:One hundred and thirtyeight patients (76 with NSCLC and 62 with ABC) received this regimen, ofwhom only five were unable to undergo dose escalation. The incidence offebrile neutropenia and neutropenic sepsis were low (2.9 and3.6%, respectively). Although severe events were uncommon,nausea/vomiting and diarrhoea were frequent and primary prophylaxis withantiemetics should be recommended. Conclusions:Overall,the safety profile of oral vinorelbine at 60 mg/m²/week forthe first three courses with escalation to 80 mg/m² isqualitatively comparable to that of i.v. vinorelbine at standard doses.Similarly to i.v. chemotherapy, close haematological monitoring isnecessary.     

Second-line docetaxel and gemcitabine combination chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy

Docetaxel has been the only single active agent against chemotherapy-pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel combined with gemcitabine, another effective drug, in patients with NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Thirty-three patients were enrolled. Prior chemotherapy was cisplatin combined with etoposide in 24 patients and vinorelbine in 9 patients. Tumors were sensitive (n=15), resistant (n=9), and refractory (n=9) to front-line chemotherapy. Treatment was docetaxel 85 mg/m² on d 1, and gemcitabine 1200 mg/m² on d 1 and 8, with cycles repeated every three weeks. Ten patients (30.3%, 95% CI: 15.6–48.7) achieved a partial response and 15 (45.5%) stable disease. Responses were similar frequencies in platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant/refractory tumors. With a median follow-up period of 5.7 mo (range 1.6–20.0), the median and 6-mo event-free survival were 5.5 mo, 40.6%, respectively. Median and 6-mo over-all survival were 7.3 mo and 52.7%. Patients with progressive disease to chemotherapy (p=0.0008), higher LDH (p=0.005), and NSE levels (p=0.03) survived shorter than other patients. In patients refractory to prior chemotherapy, survival was poor as borderline significantly (p=0.06). The major hematological toxicity was neutropenia. Grade III–IV neutropenia was noted in 14 (42%) patients, with three episodes of febrile neutropenia in 111 cycles. Docetaxel combined with gemcitabine is an active and safe second-line therapy for patients with NSCLC.     

Phase I study of weekly cisplatin, vinorelbine, and concurrent thoracic radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Background The combination of chemotherapy and thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) is considered as a standard treatment for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although the frequent interaction of anticancer agents and irradiation may produce stronger radio-sensitizing effects, the daily administration of these agents is complicated. We therefore used weekly administration of these agents, and conducted a phase I study of weekly cisplatin, vinorelbine, and concurrent TRT. The purpose of this study was to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and the recommended dose of this treatment. Methods Patients with locally advanced NSCLC were enrolled in this study. Both cisplatin and vinorelbine were given intravenously on a weekly schedule for 6 weeks, starting on the first day of TRT, i.e., on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36. The total dose of TRT was 60 Gy. The dose of cisplatin was fixed at 20 mg/m² per week. The starting dose of vinorelbine was 15 mg/m² per week (dose level 1). Results Nine patients were enrolled in this study. All three patients at dose level 1 experienced DLTs. We decreased the dose of vinorelbine to 10 mg/m² per week (dose level 0). Two of the six patients at dose level 0 experienced DLTs. Therefore, dose level 1 was considered as the MTD, and dose level 0 as the recommended dose. The DLTs of this treatment were esophagitis, fatigue, infection, and hyponatremia. Conclusion The recommended dose of cisplatin is 20 mg/m² per week and that of vinorelbine is 10 mg/m² per week with standard TRT. A phase II study of this treatment is warranted. The results of this study were presented in part at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Japan Lung Cancer Society in Fukuoka, Japan, November 21–22, 2002.     

Cisplatin plus continuous infusion vinorelbine for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase I-II study

Backbround In this Phase I/II trial, the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and activity of cisplatin plus vinorelbine (VRL) administered in continuous in-fusion as first-line treatment of advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was determined in 12 consecutive chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced NSCLC. Patients and methods The dose of cisplatin was 100 mg/m² in all patients, and vinorelbine was administered as an initial intravenous (iv) bolus of 8 mg/m² on day 1 followed by a 4-day continuous iv infusion at 4 different 24 h dose levels (DLs) to be repeated every 21 days. All 12 patients (47 cycles) were evaluable for response and toxicity. Results The MTD was 8 mg/m² bolus followed by a continuous iv infusion of 8 mg/m² per day over 4 days. The dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were febrile neutropenia in 4 patients and grade 3 mucositis in 1 patient. There was less neuro-toxicity and compared to the weekly bolus scheme. There was no significant cumulative toxicity after 3 cycles. Partial responses were observed in 6 patients; an overall response rate of 50% (95% CI: 30–65%). Median time to progression was 5,5 months (95% CI: 1,5–11 months) and median survival was 11 months (95% CI: 5–20 months). Conclusions The results demonstrate that, in this setting of first-line treatment of NSCLC, cisplatin plus vinorelbine at 8 mg/m² bolus followed by a continuous infusion of 8 mg/m² per day over 4 days is the recommended schedule. Further trials would be useful to establish activity of this combination.     

Gemcitabine and vinorelbine in recurrent advanced non-small cell lung cancer: sequence does matter

Summary Purpose Gemcitabine and vinorelbine have demonstrated clinical efficacy both as single agents and in combination in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase II trial evaluated biweekly gemcitabine and vinorelbine in NSCLC patients who have had one prior chemotherapeutic regimen and have had disease progression. Methods Gemcitabine (1,200 mg/m² IV over 30 min) was followed by vinorelbine (30 mg/m² IV over 6–10 min) on days 1 and 15 of each 28 day cycle. Chemotherapy was given for six cycles unless disease progression or unacceptable toxicity was seen. Results From 11/1998 to 10/2000, 15 of 20 patients enrolled (6 males, 9 females) were evaluable for response and survival. Two patients had grade 4 neutropenia, and one patient had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. The only non-hematologic grade 3 toxicities were fatigue, phlebitis, and arthralgias. No objective responses were observed, but 11 patients had stable disease for a mean of 6 months. The median survival time was 9.4 months (95% CI = 4.2, 14.8), with a median time to progression of 4.2 months (95% CI = 1.9, 5.6). The 1 year survival was 47%. Conclusions While this schedule of gemcitabine and vinorelbine was well tolerated, it was felt to be inactive. In vitro and pharmacokinetic studies published after the completion of our trial, suggest gemcitabine followed by vinorelbine may have antagonistic effects leading to lower dose delivery of both drugs. Our study was the only study of gemcitabine and vinorelbine in second-line NSCLC in the literature without an objective response. Our study was the only second-line study that administered gemcitabine prior to vinorelbine. First-line studies in the literature that administered vinorelbine prior to gemcitabine had, on average, a 1.7 month higher median survival (10.0 vs. 8.3 mos; P value <0.001). Because of the lack of response, further studies using this drug sequence, dose, and schedule for gemcitabine and vinorelbine are not recommended.     

Phase I trial of dose escalation of capecitabine combined with fixed docetaxel in previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Objective

Capecitabine combined with docetaxel have demonstrated antitumor synergy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Due to absence of phase I trial in China, we conducted this study to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of capecitabine with fixed docetaxel for Chinese patients with previously treated NSCLC.

Methods

Previously treated patients with NSCLC were entered into this study. Escalating doses of capecitabine with fixed docetaxel were administered in a modified Fibonacci sequence. The initial doses were capecitabine 625 mg/m², bid, on days d5?Cd18, and docetaxel 30 mg/m² on days 1 and 8, respectively. The regimen was repeated every 21 days. If no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed, the next dose level was applied. The procedures were repeated until DLT appeared. The MTD was declared to be one dose level below the level at which DLT appeared.

Results

Eighteen patients received 67 cycles at capecitabine of level I (1250 mg/m², divided into 625 mg/m², bid) and level II (1500 mg/m², 750 mg/m², bid). The most common toxicities were neutropenia, hand and feet syndrome, fatigue and nausea. Eight DLTs occurred in 5 patients in the whole group, including 1 DLT in dose level I and 7 DLTs in dose level 2. Since 4 of 6 patients in level II experienced DLTs, we declared thus level I was MTD.

Conclusion

MTD of our phase I trial was capecitabine of 1250 mg/m²/d combined with docetaxel of 30 mg/m²/wk. This combination regimen was well tolerated for previously treated patients with NSCLC. The efficacy of this schedule is currently being further evaluated in a prospective phase II trial.     

Phase I trial of weekly docetaxel combined with cisplatin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

The phase I study was conducted to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity of weekly administered docetaxel combined with cisplatin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a dose escalation study, 22 patients, under 75 years old, with unresectable and metastatic untreated NSCLC with performance status (0-1) were enrolled. Patients were treated with cisplatin (day 1) and weekly docetaxel (days 1, 8, 15). Dose escalation levels in mg/m(2) were for cisplatin and docetaxel; 70 and 15 (level 1), 80 and 15 (level 2), 80 and 20 (level 3), 80 and 25 (level 4), 80 and 30 (level 5), respectively. Chemotherapy was repeated for at least two cycles every 28 days. All patients were assessable for toxicities. Although grade 3 neutropenia occurred in one case in level 4, there were no significant modifications of chemotherapy schedule until level 4. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in all cases receiving level 5. One patient developed an infection, and two had incomplete recovery of neutropenia by the 28th day after the first cycle of chemotherapy. Nonhematological toxicities, including nephrotoxicity, nausea/vomiting, alopecia and hypersensitivity reaction, were tolerable. However, one case developed severe hyponatremia. Among 21 patients evaluable for response, eight cases achieved partial response, thus the overall response was 39%. Weekly administration of docetaxel at 25 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8, 15) combined with cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (day 1) is recommended for phase II studies. The responses observed in the present study suggest an identical high degree of activity against NSCLC with less hematotoxicity compared with a standard schedule of cisplatin and docetaxel.     

A phase II study of single-agent oral vinorelbine in patients with pretreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: Intravenous vinorelbine has demonstrated its efficacy and tolerability in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). An oral formulation of vinorelbine has been developed, and a number of phase II studies have shown its activity in chemotherapy-naive NSCLC, even in elderly patients, but no study has been performed to test activity and toxicity of oral vinorelbine in pretreated patients. The aims of our study were to investigate the activity and toxicity of oral vinorelbine in patients with NSCLC as salvage treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty pretreated patients with locally advanced (n = 6) and metastatic (n = 14) NSCLC entered the study. The schedule was oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m(2) once a week until progression or development of unacceptable toxicity. Median age was 70 years (range, 49-84 years). RESULTS: Seventeen patients were evaluable for response and all for toxicity. A median of 9 cycles were administered (range, 2-21 cycles). No objective responses were reported, 5 patients experienced stable disease, and 12 patients had progressive disease. Median time to progression was 2 months (range, 1-6 months), and median survival was 4 months (range, 1-13 months). Treatment was well tolerated, with grade 4 neutropenia in 1 patient (heavily pretreated); grade 2 diarrhea in 2 patients; asthenia in 2 patients; and abdominal pain in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: Oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m(2) once a week is a very safe schedule in heavily pretreated locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC; however, at this dose, the drug is inactive. Other phase II studies with oral vinorelbine 80 mg/m(2) weekly are warranted.