In vitro synergy and selection of resistance by fluoroquinolones plus amikacin or beta-lactams against extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli

This study compared the potential synergy of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin in combination with cefepime, ceftazidime, imipenem, piperacillin/tazobactam or amikacin, against extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli by using checkerboard and time kill studies. Moreover, selection of resistance was determined by frequency of mutations and by calculating the increase in minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) after five serial subcultures on antibiotic-containing plates. Synergy occurred more often with levofloxacin combined with imipenem (7/10 strains) and with levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin with amikacin (10/10) than for the other combinations. Time kill studies showed synergy for levofloxacin combined with amikacin, ceftazidime, imipenem or piperacillin/tazobactam, and for ciprofloxacin combined with amikacin, cefepime or imipenem. Antibiotic combinations selected for resistance less frequently than antibiotics alone. Mutation frequency was <10(-12) for all combinations. In conclusion, the combination of a fluoroquinolone with a beta-lactam or amikacin may provide improved antimicrobial activity and help limit the occurrence of resistance in ESBL-producing E. coli strains.     

Susceptibility of 228 Non-fermenting Gram-Negative Rods to Tigecycline and Six Other Antimicrobial Drugs

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the in vitro activity of tigecycline and 6 other antimicrobial drugs used in clinical practice against 228 clinical isolates of nonfermenting Gram-negative rods (NFGNRs) including Acinetobacter spp. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined according to the recommendations of the Clinical and laboratory Standards institute. For tigecycline, we used the criteria approved by the FDA. Almost 50% of the clinical isolates of Acinetobacter spp. were resistant to piperacillin/tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and ceftazidime. Strains of this microorganism were more susceptible to imipenem, and even more susceptible to colistin and tigecycline; no strains were resistant to tigecycline. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia showed even greater resistance to the drugs tested. Thus, all strains were resistant to imipenem and a large percentage (82.6%) were resistant to piperacillin/tazobactam. Resistance to the other agents tested was also high, with the exception of tigecycline, with only 3 resistant strains (MIC <8 mg/ml). Tigecycline, on the other hand, was scarcely active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which bears efflux pump systems such as MexXY-OprM. Almost 90% of strains were resistant to ciprofloxacin; only 8% were resistant to gentamicin; over half were colistin-intermediate or -resistant, and finally, approximately half of the strains were susceptible to the 3 beta-lactams studied. In conclusion, NFGNRs present variable susceptibility patterns, although they are generally highly resistant to antimicrobial agents including those considered more specific. Tigecycline, which showed good activity against most of the strains examined, broadens the spectrum of drugs available for the treatment of infections caused by these complex microorganisms.     

Multicentric study in five African countries of antibiotic susceptibility for three main pathogens: Streptococcus pneumoniae,Staphylococcus aureus,and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Antibiotic resistance is a growing clinical and epidemiological problem. We report on the antibiotic susceptibility of three pathogens isolated from patients in Algeria, Egypt, Morocco, Senegal, and Tunisia during 2010–2011. In total, 218 Streptococcus pneumoniae, 428 Staphylococcus aureus, and 414 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains were collected. S. pneumoniae resistance was noted against penicillin (30.2%), erythromycin (27.4%), cefpodoxime (19.1%), amoxicillin (12.0%), cefotaxime (7.4%), and levofloxacin (3.2%). All the strains were teicoplanin susceptible. Staphylococcus aureus methicillin resistance differed between countries, from 5.0% in Senegal to 62.7% in Egypt. Levofloxacin resistance was low in all countries, and the highest rate (in Egypt) was still only 13.6% for intermediate and resistant strains combined. Most strains were susceptible to fosfomycin (99.3%) and pristinamycin (94.2%). P. aeruginosa resistance was found against levofloxacin (30.4%), ciprofloxacin (29.9%), tobramycin (19.7%), ceftazidime (19.2%), and imipenem (17.9%), but not colistin. Antibiotic susceptibility varied widely between countries, with resistance typically most prevalent in Egypt.     

In- Vitro Activity of Meropenem,a New Carbapenem,Against Imipenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Xanthomonas maltophilia

Summary

The activity of meropenem, a new carbapenem, as well as imipenem, ceftazidime, aztreonam, tobramycin, amikacin and ciprofloxacin against 18 strains of Xanthomonas maltophilia and 23 strains of Pseudotnonas aeruginosa resistant to imipenem was tested. All strains of X. maltophilia were resistant to both penems. Ceftazidime, tobramycin and ciprofloxacin were the most active antimicrobial agents against this specie. 17% of imipenem-resistant strains of P. aeruginosa were sensitive to meropenem. Ciprofloxacin, amikacin and aztreonam were the most effective agents against these strains.     

In Vitro Activity of Meropenem against Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Abstract

The in-vitro susceptibilities of a total of 174 ciprofloxacin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were determined. According to the BSAC and NCCLS breakpoints, meropenem, aztreonam, ceftibuten, ceftazidime, imipenem and cefotaxime were the most active (>90%) antimicrobial agents tested against Enterobacteriaceae. Susceptibility of these strains to piperacillin/tazobactam, cefpodoxime and cefixime (84.96%) was higher than that to tobramycin, gentamicin and fosfomycin (50-75%). More than 90% of P. aeruginosa were susceptible to meropenem when both interpretative susceptibility breakpoint criteria were used. Piperacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam and ceftazidime were active against 50-75% of the same strains. Meropenem was the most active antimicrobial tested against all ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical isolates assayed.     

Bacteremia Due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Results from a 3-Year National Study in the Slovak Republic

Abstract

Risk factors, mortality and antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremias isolated from 148 patients from all University Hospitals in Slovakia were analyzed. Only 1.2% of 169 strains of P. aeruginosa were resistant to meropenem, 4.1% to piperacillin/tazobactam, 7.7% to ceftazidime as well as cefepime and 12% to amikacin. More than 30% of P. aeruginosa were resistant to ciprofloxacin.

Our analysis of risk factors for antimicrobial resistance to the particular antimicrobials, indicated no difference in risk factors and outcome in cases infected with P. aeruginosa bacteremias resistant to amikacin, piperacillin/tazobactam or ceftazidime in comparison to episodes caused by P. aeruginosa due to susceptible isolates. When comparing risk factors for P. aeruginosa bacteremia in children vs. adults, cancer vs. non-cancer patients, several differences in risk factors were observed.

Neither antimicrobial resistance to amikacin, ceftazidime or piperacillin/tazobactam, nor appropriateness of therapy according to two separate analyses were associated with better outcome.     

In-Vitro Susceptibility of Clinical Isolates of Serratia Species to Antimicrobial Agents

Summary

The in-vitro activities of 12 antimicrobial agents against a total of 80 clinical isolates of Serratia marcescens and Serratia liquefaciens were determined by a broth microdilution method. Ampicillin and cefazolin were totally inactive against these organisms. The other β-lactam antibiotics such as piperacillin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and the aminoglycosides such as gentamicin, tobramycin and netilmicin showed poor or moderate activity against Serratia isolates. Aztreonam and amikacin inhibited most of the strains tested. Imipenem and ciprofloxacin were very active in inhibiting all strains. Within the genus, S. liquefaciens was more resistant to aztreonam, ceftazidime and amikacin than S. marcescens.     

In Vitro Activity of β-Lactam Antimicrobial Agents in Combination with Aztreonam Tested Against Metallob-β-Lactamase-Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii

Abstract

We evaluate the antimicrobial interactions between aztreonam and selected beta-lactams when tested against metallo-β-lactamase (MβL)-producing clinical strains. Ten Pseudomonsa aeruginosa strains, including nine MβL-producers (IMP- 1, -2, -13, -16, VIM-1, -2, -7, SPM-1 and GIM-1) and five Acinetobacter baumannii strains, including three MβL-producers (IMP-1 and -2) were tested using time kill/bactericidal activity methods. Aztreonam at 4, 8 and 16 mg/L was combined with four other β-lactam antimicrobials (cefepime, ceftazidime, meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam or ampicillin/sulbactam), each tested at the recognized susceptible breakpoint concentration. Enhanced activity (synergism or additive effect) was observed with four P. aeruginosa strains (IMP-16, VIM-2, SPM-1 and GIM-1 containing strains) and four A. baumannii strains, while antagonism was observed with two P. aeruginosa (IMP-16 and SPM-1-producing strains) and one A. baumannii (non-MβL) strain. All other strains showed indifferent interaction (variation of ± 1 log₁₀ CFU/ml) with any combination evaluated.     

Successful Treatment of Murine Listeriosis and Salmonellosis with Levofloxacin

Abstract

Levofloxacin (L-ofloxacin) is a fluoroquinolone derivative. It is the active substance contained in ofloxacin with a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. In this work we examined the activity of levofloxacin against the facultative intracellular bacteria Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella typhimurium in vitro, in tissue culture and in animal models of infection. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) MIC₉₀ for Salmonella enterica and L. monocytogenes were 0.078 mg/l and 4 mg/l, respectively. Levofloxacin was bactericidal against L. monocytogenes and S. typhimurium because 8 × MIC killed 90% of the initial inoculum of L. monocytogenes EGD and S. typhimurium LT2 within 4 hours and 3 hours, respectively. Levofloxacin was more effective than ampicillin against L. monocytogenes EGD infecting tissue culture cells. Also in tissue culture cells infected with S. typhimurium LT2, levofloxacin was slightly more effective than ciprofloxacin. In animal models of infection, levofloxacin was as potent as the reference substances. In conclusion, levofloxacin is a candidate for the treatment of infections caused by facultative intracellular Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.     

Antimicrobial Activity of Isepamicin (SCH21420, 1-N-HAPA Gentamicin B) Combinations with Cefotaxime,Ceftazidime, Ceftriaxone,Ciprofloxacin, Imipenem,Mezlocillin and Piperacillin Tested Against Gentamicin-Resistant and Susceptible Gram-Negative Bacilli and Enterococci

Summary

Isepamicin, formerly SCH21420 or 1-N-HAPA gentamicin B, is an aminoglycoside that was tested alone or in combination with one of seven broad spectrum drugs against 80 clinical isolates. Half of the strains were gentamicin-resistant but only one isolate (1.396) was resistant to isepamicin. The broadest spectrum comparison drugs tested alone (ciprofloxacin at 3.8% resistance and imipenem at 5.096 resistance) were associated with the lowest synergy rates when combined with isepamicin. The rank order of synergy (complete or partial) was; cefotaxime = ceftazidime = ceftriaxone = mezlocillin = piperacillin (7596 to 8096) > imipenem (66%) > ciprofloxacin (38%). Isepamicin/ampicillin combinations produced synergistic killing of those enterococci not having high-grade resistance to gentamicin or kanamycin. Enterococcus faecium strains were also refractory to isepamicin/ampicillin synergy. Isepamicin appears to be widely useable against gentamicin-resistant gram-negative bacilli cither alone or combined with most commonly used broad spectrum bcta-lactams.     

Comparative In- Vitro Activity of Fourteen Antibiotics Against Clinical Isolates of Enterococci

Summary

The in-vitto antibacterial activities of fourteen antimicrobial agents, including ampicillin, amikacin, Augmentin, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, gentamicin, penicillin G, piperacillin, rifampicin, streptomycin and vancomycin, were compared against 195 enterococcal strains isolated from clinical specimens received at the King Abdulaziz University Hospital in Saudi Arabia. The antibacterial susceptibility was determined by the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) using an agar dilution method. Ampicillin, Augmentin and vancomycin exhibited the greatest activity, inhibiting 90% of the tested strains (MIC90) at 2 μg/ml, followed by penicillin G and piperacillin with MIC90 of 4 μg/ml. Erythromycin, third generation cephalosporins, aminoglycosides and rifampicin, on the other hand, had poor activity against enterococci with MIC90s well above the obtainable serum concentrations. The clinical implications of resistance to aminoglycosides and the alternative antimicrobial therapy in serious entrococcal infections are discussed in the text.     

A pharmacodynamic simulation to assess tigecycline efficacy for hospital-acquired pneumonia compared with other common intravenous antibiotics

A pharmacodynamic model was used to generate supportive data comparing tigecycline with other broad-spectrum agents against pathogens implicated in hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). A 5000 patient Monte Carlo simulation determined the probability of target attainment (PTA) of tigecycline (+/- ceftazidime) compared with imipenem, levofloxacin, and piperacillin/tazobactam (+/- vancomycin). PTA was calculated over MICs of current Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria collected from worldwide surveillance and weighted by the expected prevalence of these pathogens causing HAP. For monotherapy, the weighted PTA was imipenem (78.2%), piperacillin/tazobactam (73.3%), tigecycline (62.9%), and levofloxacin (62.5%). By pathogen PTA was greatest for tigecycline against Gram-positives, and ceftazidime or imipenem against Gram-negatives. Combination therapy increased PTA to 88.6%, 85.5%, 80.6%, and 69.8% for tigecycline, imipenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, and levofloxacin, respectively. Based on contemporary resistance data, tigecycline plus ceftazidime is predicted to achieve its pharmacodynamic targets similarly to combination therapy with imipenem plus vancomycin for the treatment of patients with HAP.     

Resistance Surveillance in Italy: Four-Year Results from the MYSTIC Program

Abstract

The MYSTIC program is an international, multicenter surveillance study that compares the activity of meropenem, in centers that are prescribers, with that of imipenem, ceftazidime, piperacillin/tazobactam, ciprofloxacin and gentamicin. These Italian data are from 3 centers (neutropenia, cystic fibrosis and intensive care units). A total of 2,072 (238 Gram-positive and 1,834 Gramnegative) aerobic microorganisms were collected during the study. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (33.4%) was the most isolated species followed by Escherichia coli (14.4%). All except one Enterobacteriaceae strain isolated were fully susceptible to meropenem. Moreover, the activity of meropenem against Enterobacteriaceae was about eight-fold greater than that of imipenem and four- to eight-fold more active than that of ceftazidime. Meropenem was highly active against non-fermentative Gram-negative microorganisms, exceeding the activity of most of the other antimicrobial agents tested. Moreover, meropenem showed increasing activity during the 4 years of study (starting from 86.2% in 1997 to 94.0% in 2000). In conclusion, our results indicate that meropenem has excellent potency and spectrum of activity despite being prescribed for the treatment of seriously ill patients, and appears to be a reliable option for the initial empirical treatment of serious nosocomial infections.     

Assessment of the combination of doripenem plus a fluoroquinolone against non-susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from nosocomial pneumonia patients

Abstract

Carbapenem- and fluoroquinolone-non-susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii were obtained from four nosocomial pneumonia patients who were clinically cured following combination therapy with doripenem/levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin. In vitro synergy of doripenem/levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin was evaluated using time-kill analysis. In vivo synergy was tested using a mouse lethal infection model. In time-kill studies, doripenem and levofloxacin were both bactericidal when tested at C_max; at ½C_max, the combination showed synergy up to 8 hours. Ciprofloxacin, alone or combined with doripenem, was not bactericidal. For mouse septicemia, doripenem (100 mg/kg) was ≧90% effective in preventing death in all four isolates. Levofloxacin (200 mg/kg) was 73% effective, and ciprofloxacin (35 mg/kg) was ineffective in preventing death. At lower drug concentrations, increased efficacy was observed for doripenem/levofloxacin, but not for doripenem/ciprofloxacin. Overall, the results suggest that a doripenem/levofloxacin combination may have clinical utility in treating some non-susceptible A. baumannii infections.     

Evaluation of Ciprofloxacin’s Activity against Recent Clinical Isolates

Summary

The in vitro antibacterial activity of ciprofloxacin, a new quinoline carboxylic acid, was tested against 1671 recendy clinically isolated bacterial strains, by measuring the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC). Comparisons were made with other quinolones: nalidixic acid, norfloxacin, and other drugs: piperacillin, cefoxitin, cefotetan, ceftazidime, tobramycin, rifampin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol.

Ciprofloxacin was very active against the tested species and was the most active drug against all the bacterial strains, with a geometric mean, a MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ of 0.27, 0.12 and 2 μg/ml, respectively.     

Comparative In Vitro Activity of Sparfloxacin (AT 4140, RP 64206 - SPFX) Against 275 Multiresistant Clinical Isolates

The in-vitto activity of sparfloxacin was compared with that of pefloxacin, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, ceftazidime, gentamicin and amikacin against 275 multiresistant nosocomial clinical isolates. They consisted of Pseudomonas aetuginosa (37), Entetobacter cloacae (42), Acinetobactet anitratus (60), Klebsiella pneumoniae (37) and Staphylococcus sp (99). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC₉₀) and geometric mean MICs for sparfloxacin were as follows (mg/1): P. aeruginosa 128 - 23.7, E. cloacae 1 - 0.13, A. anitratus 2 - 0.14, K. pneumoniae 1 - 0.08, MRSA 16 - 0.98, MSSA 0.12 - 0.03, MRSE 0.25 - 0.12 and MSSE 0.12 - 0.05. It is concluded that sparfloxacin was the most potent agent against staphylococci and A. anitratus including strains resistant to the other quinolones while ciprofloxacin was the most potent agent against P. aeruginosa, E. cloacae and K. pneumoniae.     

Gram-Negative Non-Fermenting Bacteria from Food-Producing Animals are Low Risk for Hospital-Acquired Infections

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate possible indications of epidemiological relationships between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from food-producing animals and those of clinical origin. Screening for P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii isolates from food-producing animals was carried out on 1381 samples. usceptibility testing and PCR amplification of resistance genes were determined. Isolate clonal relatedness was established by PFGE. Forty-one P. aeruginosa and 16 A. baumannii were detected. All P. aeruginosa isolates were sensitive to ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime and piperacillin/tazobactam and seven isolates had low-level imipenem resistance. All A. baumannii isolates were sensitive to imipenem, meropenem, ciprofloxacin and piperacillin/tazobactam but were resistant to ceftazidime. The imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa and ceftazidime-resistant A. baumannii had different PFGE patterns compared to those of human origin. Based on the findings presented here, animal isolates were not multidrug resistant and they do belong to a different pool from those of humans.     

Antimicrobial Resistance in Gram-Negative Hospital Isolates: Results of the Turkish HITIT-2 Surveillance Study of 2007

Abstract

Resistance rates to amikacin, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, cefoperazone/sulbactam and piperacillin/tazobactam in Escherichia coli (n= 438)Klebsiella pneumoniae (n= 444)Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n= 210) and Acinetobacterbaumanni (n=200) were determined with e-test in a multicenter surveillance study (HITIT-2) in 2007. ESBL production in Escherichia coli and K. pneumoniae was investigated following the CLSI guidelines. Overall 42.0% of E.coli and 41.4% of K. pneumoniae were ESBL producers. In E. coli, resistance to imipenem was not observed, resistance to ciprofloxacin and amikacin was 58.0% and 5.5% respectively. In K. pneumoniae resistance to imipenem, ciprofloxacin and amikacin was 3.1%, 17.8% 12.4% respectively. In P. aeruginosa the lowest rate of resistance was observed with piperacillin/tazobactam (18.1%). A. baumanni isolates were highly resistant to all the antimicrobial agents, the lowest level of resistance was observed against cefoperazone/sulbactam (52.0%) followed by imipenem (55.5%). This study showed that resistance rates to antimicrobials are high in nosocomial isolates and show variations among the centers.     

In- Vitro Activity of Ciprofloxacin and Sixteen Other Antimicrobial Agents against Blood Culture Isolates

Summary

The in-vitro antibacterial activities of seventeen antimicrobial agents including ampicillin, amikacin, Augmentin, aztreonam, cefazolin, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, ceftizoxime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, cloxacillin, erythromycin, gentamicin, penicillin G, piperacillin and vancomycin were compared against 100 Gram-negative and Gram-positive strains isolated from blood culture specimens received at the King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH), in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

The antibacterial susceptibility was determined by the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), using an agar dilution method. Ciprofloxacin exhibited the greatest activity, inhibiting 90% of the tested strains (MIC₉₀) at a concentration ranging from < 0.015-0.5 mg/L. Against cloxacillin resistant or susceptible strains of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci, ciprofloxacin had similar activity with MIC₉₀, of 0.2 mg/L. Salmonella typhi and salmonella species which were resistant to ampicillin and augmentin remained sensitive to ciprofloxacin (Mid₉₀ < 0.015-0.125) mg/L.). Against gentamicin sensitive and resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas species, ciprofloxacin MIC₉₀ was 0.5 and 1 mg/L respectively. Aminoglycosides, third generation cephalosporins, aztreonam and antipseudomonal penicillins, on the other hand, showed high MIC₉₀ well above the obtainable serum concentrations against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas species.     

In-vitro susceptibility of clinical isolates of Serratia species to antimicrobial agents

The in-vitro activities of 12 antimicrobial agents against a total of 80 clinical isolates of Serratia marcescens and Serratia liquefaciens were determined by a broth microdilution method. Ampicillin and cefazolin were totally inactive against these organisms. The other beta-lactam antibiotics such as piperacillin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and the aminoglycosides such as gentamicin, tobramycin and netilmicin showed poor or moderate activity against Serratia isolates. Aztreonam and amikacin inhibited most of the strains tested. Imipenem and ciprofloxacin were very active in inhibiting all strains. Within the genus, S. liquefaciens was more resistant to aztreonam, ceftazidime and amikacin than S. marcescens.