Use of a single bolus of GnRH agonist triptorelin to trigger ovulation after GnRH antagonist ganirelix treatment in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction, with special reference to the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: preliminary report: short communication

A new treatment option for patients undergoing ovarian stimulation is the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol, with the possibility to trigger a mid-cycle LH surge using a single bolus of GnRH agonist, reducing the risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in high responders and the chance of cycle cancellation. This report describes the use of 0.2 mg triptorelin (Decapeptyl) to trigger ovulation in eight patients who underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with recombinant FSH (rFSH, Puregon) and concomitant treatment with the GnRH antagonist ganirelix (Orgalutran) for the prevention of premature LH surges. All patients were considered to have an increased risk for developing OHSS (at least 20 follicles > or =11 mm and/or serum oestradiol at least 3000 pg/ml). On the day of triggering the LH surge, the mean number of follicles > or =11 mm was 25.1 +/- 4.5 and the median serum oestradiol concentration was 3675 (range 2980-7670) pg/ml. After GnRH agonist injection, endogenous serum LH and FSH surges were observed with median peak values of 219 and 19 IU/l respectively, measured 4 h after injection. The mean number of oocytes obtained was 23.4 +/- 15.4, of which 83% were mature (metaphase II). None of the patients developed any signs or symptoms of OHSS. So far, four clinical pregnancies have been achieved from the embryos obtained during these cycles, including the first birth following this approach. It is concluded that GnRH agonist effectively triggers an endogenous LH surge for final oocyte maturation after ganirelix treatment in stimulated cycles. Our preliminary results suggest that this regimen may prove effective in triggering ovulation and could be said to prevent OHSS in high responders. The efficacy and safety of such new treatment regimen needs to be established in comparative randomized studies.     

High doses of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist in in-vitro fertilization cycles do not adversely affect the outcome of subsequent freeze-thaw cycles.

The clinical application of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists instead of GnRH agonists, to prevent spontaneous premature luteinizing hormone surge during ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction treatment has been advocated. A recent, double-blind, dose-finding study, including six dosages of the GnRH antagonist ganirelix, in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), has indicated that high doses of GnRH antagonist (1 or 2 mg once daily) are associated with a low implantation rate. This follow-up study reports on the pregnancy rate after replacement of cryopreserved embryos obtained in stimulation cycles of the above-mentioned trial. Ovarian stimulation was initiated on day 2 of the cycle, with daily injections of 150 IU recombinant FSH. Ganirelix (0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 mg) was administered once daily from stimulation day 6 onwards, up to and including the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin. Retrieved oocytes were fertilized by in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection and a maximum of three fresh embryos was transferred. Excess embryos were frozen, and subsequently used in either natural or programmed cycles. Until June 1998, 11 ongoing pregnancies (12-16 weeks after embryo transfer) were achieved from 46 cycles in which embryos had been first frozen (23.9% per transfer). Six of these 11 patients had been treated with a high dose of ganirelix (1.0 or 2.0 mg) during the IVF cycles in which the embryos were obtained. In conclusion, our data suggest that high dosages of ganirelix do not adversely affect the potential of embryos to establish clinical pregnancy in freeze-thaw cycles.     

Will GnRH antagonists provide new hope for patients considered 'difficult responders' to GnRH agonist protocols?

We have assessed the use of cetrorelix, a gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist, in conjunction with clomiphene citrate and gonadotrophin in 31 in-vitro fertilization (IVF)/gamete intra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT) cycles for 25 difficult responders. Group I included 18 poor responders (24 cycles) with no live birth in 23 previous IVF cycles with GnRH agonists. Group II included seven patients (seven cycles) with polycystic ovaries. Thirteen previous IVF/GIFT cycles with GnRH agonists had resulted in one live birth and three of these patients had developed ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The treatment protocol involved a daily dose of clomiphene citrate 100 mg for 5 days and gonadotrophin injections from cycle day 2. Cetrorelix 0.25 mg/day was started when the leading follicle reached 14 mm. The outcome in both groups was favourable compared to previous treatment with GnRH agonists. In group I the abandoned cycle rate was 29 versus 57% (P = 0.06). More oocytes were produced (6.4 versus 4.7 oocytes/cycle) at a lower dose of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (709 versus 1163 IU/oocyte; P = 0.08) and two live births resulted (11.8%). In group II fewer oocytes were produced (10.2 versus 14.5 oocytes/cycle), using a lower dose of gonadotrophin (170 versus 189 IU/oocyte) and resulted in one ongoing pregnancy. No patients experienced OHSS. This report is preliminary and a further controlled randomized study is required.     

Treatment with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone is effective, safe and convenient: results of a controlled, randomized, multicentre trial. The European Orgalutran Study Group

A multicentre, open-label, randomized study of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist ganirelix (Orgalutran((R))/Antagon((TM))) was performed in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH (rFSH: Puregon((R))). The study was designed as a non-inferiority study using a long protocol of buserelin (intranasal) and rFSH as a reference treatment. A total of 730 subjects was randomized in a treatment ratio of 2:1 (ganirelix:buserelin) using an interactive voice response system which stratified for age, type of infertility and planned fertilization procedure [IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)]. The median duration of GnRH analogue treatment was 5 days in the ganirelix group and 26 days in the buserelin group, whereas the median total rFSH dose was 1500 IU and 1800 IU respectively. In addition, in the ganirelix group the mean duration of stimulation was 1 day shorter. During ganirelix treatment the incidence of LH rises (LH >/=10 IU/l) was 2.8% versus 1.3% during rFSH stimulation in the buserelin group. On the day of triggering ovulation by human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), the mean number of follicles >/=11 mm diameter was 10.7 and 11.8, and the median serum oestradiol concentrations were 1190 pg/ml and 1700 pg/ml in the ganirelix and buserelin groups respectively. The mean number of oocytes per retrieval was 9.1 and 10.4 respectively, whereas the mean number of good quality embryos was 3.3 and 3.5 respectively. The fertilization rate was equal in both groups (62.1%), and the same mean number of embryos (2.2) was replaced. The mean implantation rates were 15.7% and 21.8%, and the ongoing pregnancy rates per attempt were 20.3% and 25.7% in the ganirelix and buserelin groups respectively. Evaluation of all safety data indicated that the ganirelix regimen was safe and well tolerated. The overall incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was 2.4% in the ganirelix group and 5.9% in the reference group. The results of this study support a safe, short and convenient treatment regimen of ganirelix, resulting in a good clinical outcome for patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF or ICSI.     

Ganirelix acetate causes a rapid reduction in estradiol levels without adversely affecting oocyte maturation in women pretreated with leuprolide acetate who are at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

BACKGROUND: Elevated estradiol (E(2)) levels predispose to development of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Since GnRH antagonist is associated with a reduction in E(2) levels, we hypothesized that GnRH-antagonist treatment of women down-regulated with GnRH agonist who are at risk of OHSS might reduce E(2) levels and avoid cycle cancellation. METHODS: Retrospective study in a university-based assisted reproduction technology (ART) programme in 87 patients treated with long luteal (LL) or microdose flare (MDF) with ovarian hyperresponse and 87 control patients without ovarian hyperresponse. GnRH-antagonist (ganirelix acetate) treatment was started and leuprolide acetate discontinued in women who failed to respond to a reduction in gonadotrophin dosage. RESULTS: In the treatment group, there was a significant, reproducible reduction in serum E(2) levels. Mean E(2) at the start of ganirelix treatment was 4219.8 pg/ml and decreased in 24 h to 2613.7 pg/ml (36.7%; P < 0.001). An average of 24.9 +/- 8.8 oocytes were obtained at retrieval and an average of 19.1 +/- 8.0 were metaphase II (79.2%). Fertilization occurred in 13.9 +/- 8.1 embryos (72.8%). In this high risk group, two cases of severe OHSS (2.3%) occurred. The ongoing pregnancy rate was 51.8%. Compared with the control group, there were no statistically significant differences in the rate of oocyte recovery, oocyte maturity, 2PN rate, fertilization, cancellation, OHSS or pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: GnRH-antagonist treatment of women pretreated with GnRH agonist rapidly reduced circulating serum E(2) without adversely affecting oocyte maturation, fertilization rates or embryo quality and resulted in a high pregnancy rate in this subgroup of patients at risk of OHSS.     

Comparison of GnRH agonists and antagonists in assisted reproduction cycles of patients at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

BACKGROUND: During IVF or ICSI cycles, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a major problem. The aim of this prospective, multicentre, comparative study (using historical controls) was to assess the efficacy of a GnRH antagonist protocol in preventing OHSS in selected patients who had experienced OHSS or had been at risk of OHSS in their previous IVF/ICSI attempt. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients underwent a new cycle where the same gonadotrophin protocol was used [same dose of recombinant FSH (rFSH)] but a different protocol was used for pituitary desensitization: cetrorelix 0.25 mg multiple-dose antagonist instead of GnRH agonist long protocol. Cetrorelix 0.25 mg was administered daily, starting when the leading follicle reached a diameter of 14 mm. In other words, rFSH was administered in the new cycle according to the dosage and the step-up or step-down modalities used during the previous cycle, independently of ultrasound findings and serum estradiol (E(2)) levels. Eighty-seven patients entered the study. Out of the 87 cycles involving GnRH agonists, 49 (56.3%) were cancelled and out of the 87 involving GnRH antagonists 28 (32.2%) were cancelled [McNemar's test; 95% confidence interval (CI) -35.8% to -11.2%; P < 0.001]. After GnRH agonist cycles, we recorded 24 cases of OHSS (18 moderate and six severe; 27.6%), whereas after the GnRH antagonist cycles there were 10 cases of OHSS (nine moderate and one severe; 11.5%) (95% CI-26.4% to -5.7%; P = 0.006). There was a statistically significant reduction in the total number of follicles with a diameter >10 mm (Wilcoxon's test; Z = 6.1; P < 0.001) and of E(2) levels on the day of HCG administration (2538 versus 4322.4 pg/ml; P < 0.001) in the GnRH antagonist cycles versus GnRH agonist cycles. Twenty-nine patients had an embryo transfer in the first cycle (76.3% of oocyte retrievals) and 57 in the cycle using GnRH antagonist (96.6%). This 20.3% difference was also significant (Z-test; 95% CI 6.8-36.0%; P = 0.003). After the antagonist cycles, 18 pregnancies (20.7 per initiated cycle; 31.6% per embryo transfer) were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study presents some limitations owing to the use of historical controls, our data show a favourable effect of GnRH antagonists in reducing the incidence of OHSS and the number of assisted fertilization cycles cancelled because of the risk of OHSS in high responder patients. As a consequence, GnRH antagonist plus gonadotrophin administration could also increase the percentage of oocyte retrievals and embryo transfers in this high risk group of patients.     

Endocrinology: Comparison of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues and human chorionic gonadotrophin for the induction of ovulation and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a case-control study

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) has been suggestedas an alternative to human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) fortriggering ovulation, while preventing ovarian hyperstimulationsyndrome (OHSS). Since a prospective, controlled study wouldbe unethical at this point, we used a retrospective, case-selfcontrol approach to compare GnRHa with HCG in that context.A group of 16 in-vitro fertilization (IVF) patients who hadsevere OHSS in previous cycles, in which HCG was given to triggerovulation, were studied in subsequent cycles in which GnRHawas used. Each GnRHa cycle (case) was compared to a previousHCG cycle that resulted in OHSS (self control). None of thesesubsequent cydes resulted in severe OHSS. The use of GnRHa didnot affect the number of oocytes retrieved or their quality.Serum oestradiol concentrations on the day of ovulation triggeringwere signilicantly (P<0.01) higher in the GnRHa cycles comparedto HCG cycles. Exogenous progesterone and oestra diol were effectivein maintaining relatively constant serum oestradiol and progesteroneserum concentrations during the luteal phase. Pregnancy rateper cycle was similar in the two groups. In conclusion, theuse of GnRHa to induce ovulation in IVF patients, who are athigh risk for developing OHSS, effectively eliminates this riskwithout affecting other parameters of the stimulation cycle.     

Is continuation of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) necessary for women at risk of developing the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome?

A total of 28 women scheduled for in-vitro fertilization used buserelin and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) for ovarian stimulation. One group (I) of 17 women was given human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG 10,000 IU) to trigger ovulation, but the resulting embryos were electively cryopreserved because of the risk (serum oestradiol greater than or equal to 3500 pg/ml) of developing the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Six women continued the buserelin therapy in the luteal phase and eleven did not. In group II (n = 11), the HMG injections were discontinued because of an exaggerated ovarian response and the HCG was omitted. Six of these women continued the buserelin injections until the onset of menses and five did not. In both groups, the ovarian response to induction of ovulation (serum oestradiol concentrations and number of follicles) was similar for those who did or did not continue buserelin therapy. There was no difference in the rate of ovarian quiescence (weekly fall in serum oestradiol concentration following the stimulation) between those women who did or did not continue the buserelin therapy in either group. The serum luteinizing hormone concentrations remained low in all women in both groups. We conclude that the omission of buserelin therapy after discontinuing the HMG in women at risk of developing OHSS does not affect subsequent ovarian quiescence.     

Embryo implantation and GnRH antagonists: GnRH antagonists do not activate the GnRH receptor

Recent suggestions that gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists activate the GnRH receptor are discussed. Most of the studies cited in support of this suggestion are in-vitro studies, testing supra-pharmacological doses of GnRH analogues in cancer cell lines, whereas GnRH antagonists, e.g. ganirelix or cetrorelix, do not affect the steroidogenesis of human granulosa cells in vitro. In patients treated with GnRH antagonists prior to IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), oocyte maturity and fertilization rates are equal to those achieved following a long protocol of GnRH agonists. Although there is a tendency towards a lower pregnancy rate (not statistically significant) in the initial trials using GnRH antagonist with either recombinant FSH or human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) for ovarian stimulation, this new treatment option of GnRH antagonists facilitates short and simple treatment and improves the convenience and safety for the patient. As with GnRH agonists in the past, the clinical outcome of GnRH antagonist treatment will improve with time as more clinical experience is gained (learning curve) and the treatment protocol is optimized. Moreover, a GnRH agonist instead of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) may be used for triggering ovulation and will decrease the cancellation rate and minimize the risk for developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).     

A new approach to the management of patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation in an in-vitro fertilization programme.

In this study, we report an alternative method of management of patients at a potential risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in an in-vitro fertilization (IVF) programme, by the use of gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa). Thirty eight women considered at risk of this syndrome, having serum oestradiol greater than 4000 pg/ml following ovarian stimulation, received a GnRHa nasal spray for induction of the preovulatory endogenous luteinizing hormone surge for follicular maturation prior to oocyte recovery. Oocyte recovery (mean oocytes per cycle 18.60 +/- 4.79; range 15-35) and IVF were successfully completed in 27 cycles. Twenty six women had embryos replaced and 11 pregnancies occurred (28.9% per operation, 42.3% per replacement cycle). None of the patients developed OHSS. Where there is a risk of OHSS, the use of GnRHa to induce the preovulatory surge of endogenous luteinizing hormone for final follicular maturation provides a successful and more economical alternative to cancellation of cycles.     

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome after superovulation using GnRH agonists for IVF and related procedures.

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is the most serious iatrogenic complication of ovarian stimulation. In severe cases, haemoconcentration, hypovolaemia, thromboembolism and death may result. It is reassuring that its incidence is not increased after ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization despite very high serum oestradiol levels and large numbers of follicles and oocytes. This may be related to follicular aspiration, expert monitoring or low implantation rates. However, complete prevention has not been achieved despite the wide availability of ultrasound and oestradiol assays, thus presenting the clinician with a continuous challenge. Our aim is to analyse critically the most recent published series of OHSS in in-vitro fertilization and other assisted reproduction techniques using stimulation with gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG). The main determining factor in the development of OHSS appears to be ovarian predisposition. Patients with polycystic ovarian disease are at a high risk of OHSS and therefore a small dose and slow start of HMG is recommended, tailoring the dosage according to the ovarian response. Accurate prediction by ultrasound and oestradiol assays and strict prevention by withholding human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) or cryopreservation of all the embryos have a major impact on the occurrence of OHSS. It is interesting that fixed-schedule IVF cycles, without detailed monitoring, are not associated with an increased incidence of OHSS. The use of GnRHa, despite expectations, is associated with a higher prevalence of OHSS. Luteal phase supplementation with progesterone rather than HCG should be used in cycles where oestradiol is greater than 2500 ng/l or where the number of oocytes exceeded 10.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Embryo implantation and GnRH antagonists: ovarian actions of GnRH antagonists

The gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists, cetrorelix and ganirelix, have both been approved for ovarian stimulation to prevent a premature LH surge. Since GnRH receptors and their gene expression have been detected in human ovary, concern has risen over whether GnRH antagonists might affect ovarian function. Three large trials which compared GnRH agonists (used in the standard protocol worldwide), with the new antagonist treatment found no significant differences concerning the most important goals, e.g. pregnancy rate, fertilization and quality of oocytes. However, the concentration of oestradiol, and the pregnancy and implantation rates were lower in GnRH antagonist-treated patients. These findings again fuelled the debate about the possible extrapituitary effects of GnRH antagonists. Here, we review the conflicting data in the literature on the ovarian effects of GnRH antagonists and discuss our own results. In our view, it is unlikely that GnRH antagonists have a relevant impact on ovarian steroidogenesis and function; however, GnRH antagonists may exert other effects on the ovary.     

Luteal phase and clinical outcome after human menopausal gonadotrophin/gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist treatment for ovarian stimulation in in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

The luteal phase hormonal profile and the clinical outcome of 69 patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) after ovarian stimulation with human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) and the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist Cetrorelix were analysed. Twenty-four patients received Cetrorelix 0.5 mg (group I) while in 45 patients Cetrorelix 0.25 mg was administered (group II). Human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) was used as luteal support. Nine clinical pregnancies were obtained in group I (37.5%) and 12 in group II (26. 6%). These results were not significantly different. Serum progesterone and oestradiol concentrations did not differ between the two groups either in pregnant or non-pregnant patients. An expected decrease of the same hormones was observed 8 days after the pre-ovulatory HCG injection in non-pregnant women. With regard to serum luteinizing hormone concentrations, a decrease was observed 2 days after the pre-ovulatory HCG injection and was maintained at almost undetectable levels throughout the entire luteal phase in both conception and non-conception cycles of group I and group II. This study demonstrates that different doses of GnRH antagonist do not have any impact on the luteal phase of IVF/ICSI cycles when hormonal support is given.     

Simultaneous evaluation of basal FSH and oestradiol response to GnRH analogue (F-G-test) allows effective drug regimen selection for IVF

To determine whether preliminary assessment of ovarian reserve by simultaneous evaluation of basal follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and oestradiol response to gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue (F-G-test) can be used to tailor individually the drug regimen for ovarian stimulation, the in-vitro fertilization (IVF) results of 238 patients were retrospectively analysed. Sixty-two women with abnormal response to the test (DeltaE2 <180 pmol/l and/or FSH >9.5 mIU/ml) had commenced buserelin nasal spray in the mid-luteal phase and discontinued it on cycle day 1. Ovarian stimulation was started on cycle day 3 with 375 IU/day of gonadotrophin. Fifty-three patients completed the treatment cycle (group A). A total of 176 women with normal response to the test (DeltaE2 >180 pmol/l and FSH <9.5 mIU/ml) had continued the GnRH analogue throughout the stimulation cycle and a starting dose of 225 IU/day of gonadotrophin was used from cycle day 3. A total of 158 patients completed the treatment cycle (group B). Group A had significantly higher age (34.9 +/- 4.2 versus 33.2 +/- 4.2) (P < 0.05) and basal FSH (9.2 +/- 3.8 versus 7.0 +/- 2.2) (P < 0.05) and required a higher total dose of gonadotrophin. The numbers of oocytes retrieved and embryos transferred were significantly lower. However, fertilization, clinical pregnancies, and implantation rates were similar in both groups. It was concluded that simultaneous evaluation of basal FSH and oestradiol response to GnRH analogue can be useful in identifying subcategories of women with reduced ovarian reserve who may benefit from reduced GnRH analogue administration and a higher starting dose of gonadotrophin.     

In-vitro fertilization and the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Eight patients who developed severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) were identified among 1302 patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) over a 1 year period (prevalence of 0.6%); 63% had ultrasonically diagnosed polycystic ovaries (PCO) and 75% were undergoing their first attempt at IVF. Pretreatment with a superactive luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue significantly increased the prevalence of severe OHSS (1.1% versus 0.2%, P less than 0.05) compared with ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG). The mean serum oestradiol concentration on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration was 8200 +/- 2300 pmol/l. A mean of 19.6 +/- 6.8 follicles had been aspirated and 13.1 +/- 7.7 oocytes recovered at transvaginal ultrasound-directed oocyte recovery. All patients had an embryo transfer and luteal support in the form of HCG. The clinical pregnancy rate was 88%, multiple pregnancy rate 71% and implantation rate 63.5 +/- 41.3%. In a group of seven patients who were hospitalized for moderate OHSS during the same period, peak oestradiol levels were significantly lower than in those with severe OHSS (P less than 0.05). Of the group with moderate OHSS, 57% had PCO, the clinical pregnancy rate was 100% and multiple pregnancy rate 43%. Patients with ultrasound-diagnosed PCO have an increased risk of developing OHSS and the dose of HMG administered to them should be minimized. In patients at risk of developing OHSS, progesterone instead of HCG should be used for luteal support. Transfer of a maximum of two embryos or freezing all embryos for transfer in a subsequent cycle may reduce the likelihood of multiple pregnancy.     

The use of a GnRH antagonist (Cetrorelix) in a single dose protocol in IVF-embryo transfer: a dose finding study of 3 versus 2 mg

New gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists, which allow suppression of luteinizing hormone (LH) surges, have recently become available. We compared in this study the results of a single administration of 3 versus 2 mg Cetrorelix in 65 patients undergoing ovarian stimulation and in-vitro fertilization (IVF). The GnRH antagonist (Cetrorelix) was non-randomly administered at a dose of 3 mg (34 patients) or 2 mg (32 patients) on day 8 of the stimulation cycle. In the case of slow follicular development, the injection was delayed until oestradiol reached 400 pg/ml. No difference was observed in the decrease in LH and in oestradiol secretion between the 3 and the 2 mg groups, but the LH secretion was suppressed for a shorter time in the 2 mg group. No LH surge was observed in the 3 mg group, while one surge (3%) and one significant rise in LH were observed in the 2 mg group. No significant difference was observed in IVF results in the two groups of patients. This study demonstrates that a single injection of 3 or 2 mg successfully prevents LH surges for at least 3 days in all the patients treated. The LH rises in the 2 mg group led us to choose the 3 mg dose as a safer dose in our single administration protocol.      

Is there a difference in the function of granulosa-luteal cells in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization either with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist or gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist?

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) regulates gonadotrophin release. It has been shown that GnRH may have a direct effect on the ovary, as the addition of GnRH to granulosa cell cultures inhibits the production of progesterone and oestradiol. Specific GnRH receptors have been found to be present in rat and human granulosa cells. Desensitization of the pituitary by GnRH agonist has become common in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment, usually by a long protocol of 2-3 weeks. With the introduction of GnRH antagonists, which produce an immediate blockage of the GnRH receptors, a much shorter exposure is needed of 3-6 days. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a GnRH agonist (buserelin) and a GnRH antagonist (cetrorelix) on the function of granulosa cells cultured in vitro from IVF patients. Women were treated by IVF randomized either to have buserelin nasal spray from the luteal phase in the previous cycle or cetrorelix from day 6 of the cycle. Both groups had ovarian stimulation with human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) 150 IU daily, i.e. HCG was administered when the follicles were larger than 17 mm, and aspirated 36 h later. Granulosa cells, separated and washed from large follicles containing ova, were pooled. After 48 h of pre-incubation, the granulosa cells were cultured for 4 days in medium with either added testosterone or cAMP with or without HCG, with change of medium after 2 days. The progesterone and oestradiol concentrations in the culture medium were measured by immunological assay, and cellular protein was measured by microprotein assay. The results showed that granulosa cells from women treated with GnRH antagonist (cetrorelix) responded earlier to the in-vitro hormone stimulation in terms of progesterone accumulation than women treated with the GnRH agonist (buserelin). This may have been due to difference in time of exposure to the analogue. The results may indicate that the luteal function is less impaired in GnRH antagonist treatment than in GnRH agonist treatment.     

Revival of the natural cycles in in-vitro fertilization with the use of a new gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (Cetrorelix): a pilot study with minimal stimulation

Natural cycles were abandoned in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) embryo transfer, due to premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges--and subsequent high cancellation rates. In this study, we investigated the administration of a new gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (Cetrorelix) in the late follicular phase of natural cycles in patients undergoing IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). A total of 44 cycles from 33 healthy women [mean age 34.1 +/- 1.4 (range 26-36) years] were monitored, starting on day 8 by daily ultrasound and measurement of serum concentrations of oestradiol, LH, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and progesterone. When plasma oestradiol concentrations reached 100-150 pg/ml, with a lead follicle between 12-14 mm diameter, a single injection (s.c.) of 0.5 mg (19 cycles) or 1 mg (25 cycles) Cetrorelix was administered. Human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG; 150 IU) was administered daily at the time of the first injection of Cetrorelix, and repeated thereafter until human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. Four out of 44 cycles were cancelled (9.0%). No decline in follicular growth or oestradiol secretion was observed after Cetrorelix administration. A total of 40 oocyte retrievals leading to 22 transfers (55%) was performed. In 10 cycles (25%), no oocyte was obtained. Fertilization failure despite ICSI occurred in six cycles (15%). In two patients the embryo was arrested at the 2 pronuclear (PN) stage. The stimulation was minimal (4.7 +/- 1.4 HMG ampoules). A total of seven clinical pregnancies was obtained (32.0% per transfer, 17.5% per retrieval), of which five are ongoing. Thus, a spontaneous cycle and the GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix in single dose administration could represent a first-choice IVF treatment with none of the complications and risks of current controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols, and an acceptable success rate.     

Contribution of preovulatory-phase small follicles to the ovarian response in stimulated cycles.

The usual criteria for ovulation induction in stimulated cycles take into account the number of follicles greater than 14-16 mm in diameter. We have retrospectively investigated how the presence of small (8-12 mm) follicles at the time of the last scan influences the ovarian response for in-vitro fertilization (IVF). The mean number of small follicles was nearly constant (3.8 to 5.9) and did not correlate with the number of large (greater than 12 mm) follicles in various protocols for ovarian stimulation. In patients stimulated under the influence of a gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, the number of small follicles was correlated with the oestradiol (E2) peak level and with the number of recovered oocytes. Our data demonstrate a significant contribution of follicles less than or equal to 12 mm to peripheral E2 levels and oocyte production for IVF.     

Induction of ovulation after gnRH antagonists

The gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist binds competitively to the receptors and thereby prevents endogenous GnRH from exerting its stimulatory effect on the pituitary cells. This causes suppression of gonadotrophin secretion which occurs immediately after administration of the antagonist. When using GnRH antagonist in controlled ovarian stimulation, ovulation or maturation of the oocyte can, therefore, be induced by a variety of drugs, e.g. native GnRH, recombinant LH or short-acting GnRH agonists. Short-acting GnRH agonists were recommended for triggering ovulation in cases with a high risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Since it is evident that GnRH is required to initiate the LH surge and the oestradiol rise, a single administration of GnRH antagonist during the late follicular phase delays the LH surge. Studies showed that a single s.c. administration of 3 or 5 mg of Cetrorelix in the late follicular stage was sufficient to prevent the LH surge for 617 days. This phenomenon can be used in high responder patients who are prone to OHSS. The question whether this delay has any effect on oocyte quality and maturation still remains unanswered. Overall, there are four uses for GnRH antagonist: (i) using short-acting GnRH agonists for triggering ovulation in cases in which the GnRH antagonist is part of the protocol for ovarian stimulation. Recombinant LH and native LHRH could also be used as triggers of LH surge; (ii) delaying the LH surge in cases prone to OHSS by treatment with GnRH antagonist; (iii) to administer GnRH antagonist during the luteal phase to decrease the activity of corpora lutea; (iv) in polycystic ovarian disease with elevated LH the LH/FSH ratio can be corrected with the injection of GnRH antagonist prior to and during ovarian stimulation.