Two-year treatment with denosumab (AMG 162) in a randomized phase 2 study of postmenopausal women with low BMD.

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody to RANKL. In this randomized, placebo-controlled study of 412 postmenopausal women with low BMD, subcutaneous denosumab given every 3 or 6 mo was well tolerated, increased BMD, and decreased bone resorption markers for up to 24 mo. Continued study of denosumab is warranted in the treatment of low BMD in postmenopausal women. INTRODUCTION: Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANKL, a key mediator of osteoclastogenesis and bone remodeling. This prespecified exploratory analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of denosumab through 24 mo in the treatment of postmenopausal women with low BMD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred twelve postmenopausal women with lumbar spine BMD T-scores of -1.8 to -4.0 or femoral neck/total hip T-scores of -1.8 to -3.5 were randomly assigned to receive double-blind, subcutaneous injections of placebo; denosumab 6, 14, or 30 mg every 3 mo; denosumab 14, 60, 100, or 210 mg every 6 mo; or open-label oral alendronate 70 mg once weekly. Outcome measures included BMD at the lumbar spine, total hip, distal one-third radius, and total body; bone turnover markers; and safety. RESULTS: Denosumab increased BMD at all measured skeletal sites and decreased concentrations of bone turnover markers compared with placebo at 24 mo. At the lumbar spine, BMD increases with denosumab ranged from 4.13% to 8.89%. BMD changes with denosumab 30 mg every 3 mo and > or =60 mg every 6 mo were similar to, or in some cases greater than, with alendronate. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the placebo, denosumab, and alendronate treatment groups. Exposure-adjusted adverse events over 2 yr of treatment were similar to those reported during the first year of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In these postmenopausal women with low BMD, treatment with denosumab for 2 yr was associated with sustained increases in BMD and reductions in bone resorption markers compared with placebo.     

Effects of denosumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover in postmenopausal women transitioning from alendronate therapy

Patients treated with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis may discontinue or require a switch to other therapies. Denosumab binds to RANKL and is a potent inhibitor of bone resorption that has been shown to increase bone mineral density (BMD) and decrease fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. This was a multicenter, international, randomized, double‐blind, double‐dummy study in 504 postmenopausal women ≥ 55 years of age with a BMD T‐score of ?2.0 or less and ?4.0 or more who had been receiving alendronate therapy for at least 6 months. Subjects received open‐label branded alendronate 70 mg once weekly for 1 month and then were randomly assigned to either continued weekly alendronate therapy or subcutaneous denosumab 60 mg every 6 months and were followed for 12 months. Changes in BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover were evaluated. In subjects transitioning to denosumab, total hip BMD increased by 1.90% at month 12 compared with a 1.05% increase in subjects continuing on alendronate (p < .0001). Significantly greater BMD gains with denosumab compared with alendronate also were achieved at 12 months at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and 1/3 radius (all p < .0125). Median serum CTX levels remained near baseline in the alendronate group and were significantly decreased versus alendronate (p < .0001) at all time points with denosumab. Adverse events and serious adverse events were balanced between groups. No clinical hypocalcemic adverse events were reported. Transition to denosumab produced greater increases in BMD at all measured skeletal sites and a greater reduction in bone turnover than did continued alendronate with a similar safety profile in both groups. Copyright © 2010 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research     

Effect of denosumab on bone density and turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass after long-term continued, discontinued, and restarting of therapy: a randomized blinded phase 2 clinical trial

INTRODUCTION: Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL), an essential mediator of osteoclast formation, function, and survival that has been shown to decrease bone turnover and increase bone mineral density (BMD) in treated patients. We assessed the long-term efficacy and safety of denosumab, and the effects of discontinuing and restarting denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. METHODS: Postmenopausal women with a lumbar spine T-score of -1.8 to -4.0 or proximal femur T-score of -1.8 to -3.5 were randomized to denosumab every 3 months (Q3M; 6, 14, or 30 mg) or every 6 months (Q6M; 14, 60, 100, or 210 mg); placebo; or open-label oral alendronate weekly. After 24 months, patients receiving denosumab either continued treatment at 60 mg Q6M for an additional 24 months, discontinued therapy, or discontinued treatment for 12 months then re-initiated denosumab (60 mg Q6M) for 12 months. The placebo cohort was maintained. Alendronate-treated patients discontinued alendronate and were followed. Changes in BMD and bone turnover markers (BTM) as well as safety outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 262/412 (64%) patients completed 48 months of study. Continuous, long-term denosumab treatment increased BMD at the lumbar spine (9.4% to 11.8%) and total hip (4.0% to 6.1%). BTM were consistently suppressed over 48 months. Discontinuation of denosumab was associated with a BMD decrease of 6.6% at the lumbar spine and 5.3% at the total hip within the first 12 months of treatment discontinuation. Retreatment with denosumab increased lumbar spine BMD by 9.0% from original baseline values. Levels of BTM increased upon discontinuation and decreased with retreatment. Adverse event rates were similar among treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In postmenopausal women with low BMD, long-term denosumab treatment led to gains in BMD and reduction of BTM throughout the course of the study. The effects on bone turnover were fully reversible with discontinuation and restored with subsequent retreatment.     

Treatment with once-weekly alendronate 70 mg compared with once-weekly risedronate 35 mg in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized double-blind study.

Once-weekly alendronate 70 mg and once-weekly risedronate 35 mg are indicated for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. These two agents were compared in a 12-month head-to-head trial. Greater gains in BMD and greater reductions in markers of bone turnover were seen with alendronate compared with risedronate with similar tolerability. INTRODUCTION: The nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates, alendronate and risedronate, are available in once-weekly (OW) formulations for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. A 12-month, head-to-head study was performed to compare these agents in the treatment of postmenopausal women with low BMD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1053 patients from 78 U.S. sites were randomized to OW alendronate 70 mg (N = 520) or risedronate 35 mg (N = 533), taken in the morning after fasting. Endpoints included BMD changes over 6 and 12 months at the hip trochanter, total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine (LS); percent of patients with predefined levels of change in trochanter and LS BMD at 12 months; and change in biochemical markers of bone turnover at 3, 6, and 12 months. Tolerability was evaluated by adverse experience (AE) reporting. RESULTS: Significantly greater increases in hip trochanter BMD were seen with alendronate (3.4%) than risedronate (2.1%) at 12 months (treatment difference, 1.4%; p < 0.001) as well as 6 months (treatment difference, 1.3%; p < 0.001). Significantly greater gains in BMD were seen with alendronate at all BMD sites measured (12-month difference: total hip, 1.0%; femoral neck, 0.7%; LS, 1.2%). Significant differences were seen as early as 6 months at all sites. A greater percentage of patients had > or =0% (p < 0.001) and > or =3% (p < 0.01) gain in trochanter and spine BMD at 12 months with alendronate than risedronate. Significantly greater (p < 0.001) reductions in all biochemical markers of bone turnover occurred with alendronate compared with risedronate by 3 months. No significant differences were seen between treatment groups in the incidence of upper gastrointestinal AEs or AEs causing discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: In this 12-month, head-to-head trial of alendronate and risedronate, given in accordance with the approved OW regimens for treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, alendronate produced greater gains in BMD and greater reductions in markers of bone turnover than risedronate. The greater antiresorptive effect of alendronate was seen as early as 3 months, and the tolerability profiles were similar.     

Denosumab Significantly Increases DXA BMD at Both Trabecular and Cortical Sites: Results From the FREEDOM Study

Denosumab is an approved therapy for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high or increased risk for fracture. In the FREEDOM study, denosumab reduced fracture risk and increased bone mineral density (BMD). We report the spine and hip dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) BMD responses from the overall study of 7808 women and from a substudy of 441 participants in which more extensive spine and hip assessments as well as additional skeletal sites were evaluated. Significant BMD improvements were observed as early as 1 mo at the lumbar spine, total hip, and trochanter (all p < 0.005 vs placebo and baseline). BMD increased progressively at the lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, trochanter, 1/3 radius, and total body from baseline to months 12, 24, and 36 (all p < 0.005 vs placebo and baseline). BMD gains above the least significant change of more than 3% at 36 months were observed in 90% of denosumab-treated subjects at the lumbar spine and 74% at the total hip, and gains more than 6% occurred in 77% and 38%, respectively. In conclusion, denosumab treatment resulted in significant, early, and continued BMD increases at both trabecular and cortical sites throughout the skeleton over 36 mo with important gains observed in most subjects.     

FRAME Study: The Foundation Effect of Building Bone With 1 Year of Romosozumab Leads to Continued Lower Fracture Risk After Transition to Denosumab

Romosozumab is a bone‐forming agent with a dual effect of increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption. In FRActure study in postmenopausal woMen with ostEoporosis (FRAME), postmenopausal women with osteoporosis received romosozumab 210 mg s.c. or placebo once monthly for 12 months, followed by denosumab 60 mg s.c. once every 6 months in both groups for 12 months. One year of romosozumab increased spine and hip BMD by 13% and 7%, respectively, and reduced vertebral and clinical fractures with persistent fracture risk reduction upon transition to denosumab over 24 months. Here, we further characterize the BMD gains with romosozumab by quantifying the percentages of patients who responded at varying magnitudes; report the mean T‐score changes from baseline over the 2‐year study and contrast these results with the long‐term BMD gains seen with denosumab during Fracture REduction Evaluation of Denosumab in Osteoporosis every 6 Months (FREEDOM) and its Extension studies; and assess fracture incidence rates in year 2, when all patients received denosumab. Among 7180 patients (n = 3591 placebo, n = 3589 romosozumab), most romosozumab‐treated patients experienced ≥3% gains in BMD from baseline at month 12 (spine, 96%; hip, 78%) compared with placebo (spine, 22%; hip, 16%). For romosozumab patients, mean absolute T‐score increases at the spine and hip were 0.88 and 0.32, respectively, at 12 months (placebo: 0.03 and 0.01) and 1.11 and 0.45 at 24 months (placebo‐to‐denosumab: 0.38 and 0.17), with the 2‐year gains approximating the effect of 7 years of continuous denosumab administration. Patients receiving romosozumab versus placebo in year 1 had significantly fewer vertebral fractures in year 2 (81% relative reduction; p < 0.001), with fewer fractures consistently observed across other fracture categories. The data support the clinical benefit of rebuilding the skeletal foundation with romosozumab before transitioning to antiresorptive therapy. © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Dose–response study of denosumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

Summary  

The efficacy and safety of denosumab were evaluated in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Total hip and distal 1/3 radius bone mineral densities (BMDs) were increased, and lumbar spine BMD was increased in magnitude with increasing dose. Bone turnover markers significantly decreased compared with placebo. Denosumab was well tolerated in Japanese subjects.     

Multinational, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Trial of the Effects of Alendronate on Bone Density and Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal Women with Low Bone Mass: Results of the FOSIT Study

This randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the safety, tolerability and effects on bone mineral density (BMD) of alendronate in a large, multinational population of postmenopausal women with low bone mass. At 153 centers in 34 countries, 1908 otherwise healthy, postmenopausal women with lumbar spine BMD 2 standard deviations or more below the premenopausal adult mean were randomly assigned to receive oral alendronate 10 mg (n = 950) or placebo (n = 958) once daily for 1 year. All patients received 500 mg elemental calcium daily. Baseline characteristics of patients in the two treatment groups were similar. At 12 months, mean increases in BMD were significantly (p相似文献   

Effects of 24 Months of Treatment With Romosozumab Followed by 12 Months of Denosumab or Placebo in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density: A Randomized,Double‐Blind,Phase 2, Parallel Group Study

Over 12 months, romosozumab increased bone formation and decreased bone resorption, resulting in increased bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women with low BMD (NCT00896532). Herein, we report the study extension evaluating 24 months of treatment with romosozumab, discontinuation of romosozumab, alendronate followed by romosozumab, and romosozumab followed by denosumab. Postmenopausal women aged 55 to 85 years with a lumbar spine (LS), total hip (TH), or femoral neck T‐score ≤–2.0 and ≥–3.5 were enrolled and randomly assigned to placebo, one of five romosozumab regimens (70 mg, 140 mg, 210 mg monthly [QM]; 140 mg Q3M; 210 mg Q3M) for 24 months, or open‐label alendronate for 12 months followed by romosozumab 140 mg QM for 12 months. Eligible participants were then rerandomized 1:1 within original treatment groups to placebo or denosumab 60 mg Q6M for an additional 12 months. Percentage change from baseline in BMD and bone turnover markers (BTMs) at months 24 and 36 and safety were evaluated. Of 364 participants initially randomized to romosozumab, placebo, or alendronate, 315 completed 24 months of treatment and 248 completed the extension. Romosozumab markedly increased LS and TH BMD through month 24, with largest gains observed with romosozumab 210 mg QM (LS = 15.1%; TH = 5.4%). Women receiving romosozumab who transitioned to denosumab continued to accrue BMD, whereas BMD returned toward pretreatment levels with placebo. With romosozumab 210 mg QM, bone formation marker P1NP initially increased after treatment initiation and gradually decreased to below baseline by month 12, remaining below baseline through month 24; bone resorption marker β‐CTX rapidly decreased after treatment, remaining below baseline through month 24. Transition to denosumab further decreased both BTMs, whereas after transition to placebo, P1NP returned to baseline and β‐CTX increased above baseline. Adverse events were balanced between treatment groups through month 36. These data suggest that treatment effects of romosozumab are reversible upon discontinuation and further augmented by denosumab. © 2018 The Authors Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Bone Mass Gains After One Denosumab Injection Followed by Zoledronate

Denosumab discontinuation can lead to bone loss despite subsequent bisphosphonate therapy. This bone loss is more severe in patients treated with denosumab for longer than 3 years. We aimed to evaluate the bone mass changes after only a single denosumab injection followed by zoledronate administration. We screened all of our patients who received a single denosumab injection and who were included in the osteoporosis register from the Swiss Society of Rheumatology between August 1, 2010, and January 31, 2022. This case series assessed the outcome of patients who were consecutively treated with one denosumab injection followed by a single infusion of zoledronate 6 months later. Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers (BTM) changes were analysed before therapy and 18 months later. Percentage BMD changes and T-scores were compared with those of registered patients who received 2.5 years of denosumab treatment and one subsequent infusion of zoledronate. Thirty-two patients (31 female, 1 male) received a single denosumab injection and one zoledronate infusion 6 months later. BTM decreased significantly in this period (p = 0.035). Percentage BMD changes from baseline to 1 year after zoledronate treatment were 7.6% [IQR 3.2, 9.4] at the lumbar spine, 3.5% [1.8, 5.9] at the total hip and 4.6% [1.3, 6.0] at the femoral neck. In contrast, percentage changes from baseline in 110 patients with 2.5 years of denosumab treatment and one zoledronate infusion were 5.6% [3.0, 9.1], 2.3% [0.2, 4.9] and 2.3% [?0.9, 4.7], respectively. Differences between the 2 groups were significant at the lumbar spine (p = 0.014), total hip (p = 0.010) and femoral neck (p = 0.010).A single denosumab injection followed by zoledronate led to a remarkable gain of BMD at the lumbar spine and hip within a short time. This observation could help to identify a new short treatment sequence for patients with osteoporosis.     

Effects of Bazedoxifene on BMD and Bone Turnover in Postmenopausal Women: 2‐Yr Results of a Randomized,Double‐Blind,Placebo‐, and Active‐Controlled Study

Osteoporosis is an increasingly common health concern in postmenopausal women. In a 2‐yr phase III study, bazedoxifene prevented bone loss, reduced bone turnover, and was well tolerated in early postmenopausal women with normal or low BMD. Introduction : Bazedoxifene is a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator that has increased BMD and bone strength in experimental models, without stimulating breast or uterus. This 24‐mo, randomized, double‐blind study assessed the efficacy and safety of three doses of bazedoxifene compared with placebo and raloxifene in the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Materials and Methods : Healthy postmenopausal women with a BMD T‐score at the lumbar spine or femoral neck between –1.0 and ?2.5 or clinical risk factors for osteoporosis were randomly assigned to one of five groups: bazedoxifene 10, 20, or 40 mg/d, placebo, or raloxifene 60 mg/d. All women received elemental calcium. Efficacy outcomes included changes from baseline through 24 mo in BMD of the lumbar spine, hip, femoral neck, and femoral trochanter and biomarkers of bone metabolism. Results : The intent‐to‐treat population included 1434 women (mean age, 58 yr; mean time from last menstrual period, 11 yr). All doses of bazedoxifene and raloxifene prevented bone loss, whereas in the placebo group, there was significant loss of BMD at all skeletal sites. Mean differences in percent change in lumbar spine BMD from baseline to 24 mo relative to placebo were 1.08 ± 0.28%, 1.41 ± 0.28%, 1.49 ± 0.28%, and 1.49 ± 0.28% for 10, 20, and 40 mg bazedoxifene and 60 mg raloxifene, respectively (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Comparable BMD responses were observed at other body sites. Significant and comparable decreases in serum osteocalcin and C‐telopeptide levels from baseline and relative to placebo with active treatment were observed as early as 3 mo and were sustained through study conclusion (p < 0.001). Overall incidences of adverse events, serious adverse events, and discontinuations caused by adverse events were similar between groups. The most common adverse events included headache, infection, arthralgia, pain, hot flush, and back pain. Conclusions : Treatment with bazedoxifene prevented bone loss and reduced bone turnover equally as well as raloxifene and was generally well tolerated in postmenopausal women with normal/low BMD.     

Effects of denosumab on bone histomorphometry: The FREEDOM and STAND studies

Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody against RANKL, reversibly inhibits osteoclast‐mediated bone resorption and has been developed for use in osteoporosis. Its effects on bone histomorphometry have not been described previously. Iliac crest bone biopsies were collected at 24 and/or 36 months from osteoporotic postmenopausal women in the FREEDOM study (45 women receiving placebo and 47 denosumab) and at 12 months from postmenopausal women previously treated with alendronate in the STAND study (21 continuing alendronate and 15 changed to denosumab at trial entry). Qualitative histologic evaluation of biopsies was unremarkable. In the FREEDOM study, median eroded surface was reduced by more than 80% and osteoclasts were absent from more than 50% of biopsies in the denosumab group. Double labeling in trabecular bone was observed in 94% of placebo bones and in 19% of those treated with denosumab. Median bone‐formation rate was reduced by 97%. Among denosumab‐treated subjects, those with double labels and those with absent labels had similar levels of biochemical markers of bone turnover. In the STAND trial, indices of bone turnover tended to be lower in the denosumab group than in the alendronate group. Double labeling in trabecular bone was seen in 20% of the denosumab biopsies and in 90% of the alendronate samples. Denosumab markedly reduces bone turnover and also reduces fracture numbers. Longer follow‐up is necessary to determine how long such low turnover is safe. © 2010 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.     

Bone Turnover and the Response to Alendronate Treatment in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

This study investigated whether bone turnover influences the response to alendronate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. One hundred postmenopausal osteoporotic women were randomized to receive either alendronate (10 mg/day) plus calcium (1000 mg/day) (n = 50) or calcium alone (n = 50). Vertebral and radial bone density, measured by DXA, and markers of bone turnover were assessed at baseline and after 1 and 2 years. At the end of treatment, alendronate users showed an increase of 5.0% and 2.3%, respectively, at the lumbar spine and ultradistal radius; in the group treated only with calcium, bone mineral density (BMD) decreased by 1.6% at the lumbar spine and 1.3% at the ultradistal radius. The difference between the two groups was significant (P < 0.001). The patients were divided into high (HT) or low (LT) bone turnover groups, as assessed by 24-hour whole body retention (WBR%) of ^99mTc-methylene-diphosphonate. The response to alendronate treatment was greater in HT patients compared with LT patients. In fact, at the end of the study period, BMD at the lumbar spine had increased by 7.9% in HT patients and by 3.0% in LT patients; the difference between the two groups was significant (P < 0.001). No significant difference between the two groups was found for BMD at the ultradistal radius. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that 2-year treatment with alendronate has highly positive effects on bone mass at both the lumbar spine and ultradistal radius. The increase in bone mass, especially at the axial level, is influenced by bone turnover. Therefore, the evaluation of bone turnover may be useful in predicting the response to alendronate treatment. Received: 23 April 1998 / Accepted: 10 June 1999     

Effects of alendronate on osteopenic postmenopausal Chinese women

To evaluate the effects of alendronate on postmenopausal Chinese women with osteopenia, we treated 46 subjects daily with either 10 mg alendronate (N = 24) or placebo plus 500 mg calcium supplement (N = 22), and measured their bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and hip, and urinary bone resorption markers before, during, and after the 1 year treatment period. The bone markers included N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx) and deoxypyridinoline (Dpd); both were corrected by the concentration of creatinine in the same sample (NTx/Cr and Dpd/Cr). Both NTx/Cr and Dpd/Cr decreased significantly by 44% and 28%, respectively (p < 0.05 for both), in 1 month in the active treatment group but did not change in the placebo group. BMD at the spine, femoral neck, trochanter, and Ward's triangle increased significantly by 6 months and showed a further increase through month 12 at the spine in the alendronate-treated group. Relative to the placebo group, BMD changes at various sites in the alendronate-treated group were higher at 12 months by 6%-11%. Thus, our data suggest that 10 mg alendronate daily resulted in significant increases in spine and hip BMD, and decreases of urinary resorption markers in the osteopenic postmenopausal Chinese women studied. The amplitude of responses was higher than in previous reports in the USA and Europe.     

Differential effects of teriparatide on BMD after treatment with raloxifene or alendronate.

We investigated the effects of 18 months of treatment with teriparatide in patients previously treated with long-term antiresorptive therapy using bone turnover markers and bone densitometry. Previous raloxifene treatment allowed for teriparatide-induced early bone marker and BMD increases comparable with previously published results for treatment-n?ive patients. Conversely, previous alendronate treatment reduced the bone marker and BMD response. INTRODUCTION: Teriparatide [rhPTH(1-34)] has been shown to increase BMD and reduce the risk of fracture in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Our objective was to investigate the skeletal effects of 18 months of treatment with teriparatide in women whose osteoporosis was previously treated with either alendronate or raloxifene. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Daily subcutaneous injections of 20 microg teriparatide were administered for 18 months to 59 postmenopausal women, 60-87 years of age, with BMD T-scores 相似文献   

Effects of bazedoxifene on bone mineral density,bone turnover,and safety in postmenopausal japanese women with osteoporosis

This randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, dose‐response late phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene in postmenopausal Japanese women 85 years of age or younger with osteoporosis. Eligible subjects received daily treatment with oral doses of bazedoxifene 20 or 40 mg or placebo for 2 years. Efficacy assessments included bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and other skeletal sites, bone turnover marker levels, lipid parameters, and incidence of new fractures. Of 429 randomized subjects, 387 were evaluable for efficacy, and 423 were included in the safety analyses (mean age, 64 years). At 2 years, the mean percent changes from baseline in lumbar spine BMD were significantly greater with bazedoxifene 20 and 40 mg (2.43% and 2.74%, respectively) than with placebo (?0.65%, p < .001 for both). Both bazedoxifene doses significantly improved BMD at the total hip, femoral neck, and greater trochanter compared with placebo (p < .001 for all). Decreases in bone turnover markers were observed with bazedoxifene 20 and 40 mg as early as 12 weeks (p < .05 for all) and were sustained throughout the study. Total and low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were significantly decreased from baseline with both bazedoxifene doses compared with placebo (p < .05 for all). Incidences of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures were similar among the bazedoxifene and placebo groups. Overall, the incidence of adverse events with bazedoxifene 20 and 40 mg was similar to that with placebo. Bazedoxifene significantly improved BMD, reduced bone turnover, and was well tolerated in postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis. © 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.     

Effect of denosumab on bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover: 8-year results of a phase 2 clinical trial

Summary

In a phase 2 study, continued denosumab treatment for up to 8 years was associated with continued gains in bone mineral density and persistent reductions in bone turnover markers. Denosumab treatment was well tolerated throughout the 8-year study.

Introduction

The purpose of this study is to present the effects of 8 years of continued denosumab treatment on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers (BTM) from a phase 2 study.

Methods

In the 4-year parent study, postmenopausal women with low BMD were randomized to receive placebo, alendronate, or denosumab. After 2 years, subjects were reallocated to continue, discontinue, or discontinue and reinitiate denosumab; discontinue alendronate; or maintain placebo for two more years. The parent study was then extended for 4 years where all subjects received denosumab.

Results

Of the 262 subjects who completed the parent study, 200 enrolled in the extension, and of these, 138 completed the extension. For the subjects who received 8 years of continued denosumab treatment, BMD at the lumbar spine (N?=?88) and total hip (N?=?87) increased by 16.5 and 6.8 %, respectively, compared with their parent study baseline, and by 5.7 and 1.8 %, respectively, compared with their extension study baseline. For the 12 subjects in the original placebo group, 4 years of denosumab resulted in BMD gains comparable with those observed during the 4 years of denosumab in the parent study. Reductions in BTM were sustained over the course of continued denosumab treatment. Reductions also were observed when the placebo group transitioned to denosumab. Adverse event profile was consistent with previous reports and an aging cohort.

Conclusion

Continued denosumab treatment for 8 years was associated with progressive gains in BMD, persistent reductions in BTM, and was well tolerated.     

Efficacy and safety of a once‐yearly i.v. Infusion of zoledronic acid 5 mg versus a once‐weekly 70‐mg oral alendronate in the treatment of male osteoporosis: A randomized,multicenter, double‐blind,active‐controlled study

Zoledronic acid (ZOL) has shown beneficial effects on bone turnover and bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal osteoporosis. This study compared the efficacy and safety of a once‐yearly i.v. infusion of ZOL with weekly oral alendronate (ALN) in men with osteoporosis. In this multicenter, double‐blind, active‐controlled, parallel‐group study, participants (n = 302) were randomized to receive either once‐yearly ZOL 5 mg i.v. or weekly oral ALN 70 mg for 24 months. Changes in BMD and bone marker levels were assessed. ZOL increased BMD at the lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter and was not inferior to ALN at 24 months [least squares mean estimates of the percentage increases in lumbar spine BMD of 6.1% and 6.2%; difference approximately 0.13; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12–0.85 in the ZOL and ALN groups, respectively]. At month 12, the median change from baseline of markers for bone resorption [serum β‐C‐terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (β‐CTx) and urine N‐terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx)] and formation [serum N‐terminal propeptide of type I collagen (P1NP) and serum bone‐specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP)] were comparable between ZOL and ALN groups. Most men preferred i.v. ZOL over oral ALN. The incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events was similar in the treatment groups. It is concluded that a once‐yearly i.v. infusion of ZOL 5 mg increased bone density and decreased bone turnover markers similarly to once‐weekly oral ALN 70 mg in men with low bone density. © 2010 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.     

Bone mass continues to increase at the hip after parathyroid hormone treatment is discontinued in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is the most common secondary cause of osteoporosis. In this 24-month study, we report changes in bone turnover and bone mass after 12 months of daily injections of human parathyroid hormone 1-34 [hPTH(1-34)] and 12 months off treatment in postmenopausal women (mean age, 63 years) with osteoporosis treated with glucocorticoid and hormone replacement therapy. Response to the treatment was assessed with bone mineral density (BMD) measurements of the lumbar spine by quantitative computed tomography (QCT); BMD measurements of the lumbar spine, hip, and forearm by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA); and biochemical markers of bone turnover. The mean (+/-SEM) change in BMD of the lumbar spine by QCT and DXA in the PTH group at 24 months was 45.9+/-6.4% and 12.6+/-2.2% (p < 0.001). The change in total hip and femoral neck BMD was not significant at 12 months but increased to 4.7+/-0.9% (p < 0.01) and 5.2+/-1.3% at 24 months, respectively, as compared with a relatively small change of 1.3+/-0.9% and 2.6+/-1.7% in the estrogen-only group. The mean percent differences in BMD of the lumbar spine by QCT and DXA between the groups at 24 months were 43.1% and 11.9%, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean percent differences over the estrogen-only group in hip BMD were 3.4% for total hip (p < 0.01) and 2.6% for femoral neck at 24 months. Biochemical markers of bone turnover increased to more than 150% during the first 6 months of therapy, remained elevated throughout the 12-month treatment period, and returned to baseline values within 6 months of discontinuing the PTH treatment. These results suggest that PTH dramatically increases bone mass in the lumbar spine and hip in postmenopausal women with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis who are taking hormone replacement therapy. However, the maximum effect of this anabolic agent on bone mass at the hip after 12 months of treatment requires at least 6-12 months after the PTH treatment is discontinued.     

双膦酸盐类药物治疗骨质疏松症

目的 评价不同类型双膦酸盐药物的临床疗效。方法 骨质疏松妇女360人,随机分成3组,所有患者每天在接受元素钙500 mg和维生素D200IU治疗的同时,分别接受羟乙膦酸钠、阿伦膦酸钠和利塞膦酸钠治疗,其中羟乙膦酸钠200 mg,bid,用2周,间歇11周后再次重复;阿伦膦酸钠10mg,qd;利塞膦酸钠5 mg,qd。3种药物治疗时间均为1年。观察内容包括:骨痛,尿N肽端交联Ⅰ型胶原,NTx和血清骨碱性磷酸酶,BAP,骨密度,不良反应,脊柱新骨折。结果 3组患者经1年治疗,与用药前比较,骨痛症状均有不同程度改善;骨代谢指标N肽端交联Ⅰ型胶原和骨碱性磷酸酶均明显下降(P<0.01);腰椎和髋部骨量均有显著上升(P<0.01):其中阿伦膦酸钠治疗组骨密度腰椎L2-4上升5.51％,股骨颈上升2.66％,股骨粗隆上升4.37％,Ward’s区上升3.13％;利塞膦酸钠治疗组骨密度腰椎L2-4上升4.18％,股骨颈上升2.05％,股骨粗隆上升2.81％,Ward’s区上升3.08％;羟乙膦酸钠治疗组骨密度腰椎L2-4上升3.70％,股骨颈上升1.84％,股骨粗隆上升1.96％,Ward’s区上升1.50％;新骨折发生羟乙膦酸钠组4人,阿伦膦酸钠和利塞膦酸钠组均为1人;各组均未见明显不良反应。 结论双膦酸盐治疗骨质疏松症疗效确切,新型双膦酸盐阿伦膦酸钠和利塞膦酸钠更方便、高效。