Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with left ventricular noncompaction

Background: Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) is a rare, congenital cardiomyopathy and can be associated with heart failure, embolic events, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death. Implantation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in these patients is a treatment option, but data on long-term follow-up are limited. The aim of the study was to analyze the clinical outcome of patients with LVNC who were treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on 12 patients (mean age: 45 ± 13 years, range 20–60) with LVNC, who underwent ICD implantation for secondary (n = 8) and primary (n = 4) prevention.
Results: During a median follow-up of 36 months, five patients (42%) presented with appropriate ICD therapy: in four of the eight patients (50%) in whom the ICD was implanted as a secondary prevention and in one of the four patients (25%) for whom the ICD was implanted for primary prevention. In eight patients (66%) supraventricular tachyarrhythmias were documented. Improvement of left ventricular function could be observed in one of two patients with a biventricular ICD.
Conclusions: Potentially life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias may occur in patients with LVNC. ICD therapy may be effective for primary and secondary prevention in these patients. Due to the high prevalence of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias devices with reliable detection enhancements should be considered.     

Characteristics and relevance of clustering ventricular arrhythmias in defibrillator recipients

INTRODUCTION: Studies of recurrent ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) have been limited to "electrical storms," where recurrent arrhythmias necessitate repeated external cardioversions or defibrillations. Patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) may also suffer frequently recurrent arrhythmias. The aim of this study was to analyze the temporal pattern and the clinical relevance of clustering ventricular arrhythmias in ICD recipients. METHODS: The incidence and the type of arrhythmias were determined by reviewing stored electrograms. VT/VF clusters were defined as the occurrence of three or more adequate and successful ICD interventions within 2 weeks. Two hundred and fourteen consecutive ICD recipients were followed during an average of 3.3 +/- 2.2 years (698 patient-years). RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (24%) suffered 98 VT/VF clusters 21 +/- 22 months after ICD implantation, 93% of these clusters consisting of recurrent regular VT. Monomorphic VT as index event leading to ICD implantation was the only factor predicting VT/VF clusters. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the combined end-point of death or heart transplantation showed a 5-year event-free survival of 67% versus 87% in patients with and without clusters, respectively (P = 0.026). Adjusted hazard ratios for death or heart transplantation in the group with arrhythmia clusters was 3.5 (95% confidence interval 1.5-7.9 P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: VT/VF clusters are frequent late after ICD implantation particularly in patients who had VT as index-event. As arrhythmias and recurrent ICD interventions are responsible for an important morbidity, there is a possible role for a prophylactic intervention. Furthermore, VT/VF clusters are an independent marker of increased risk of death or need for heart transplantation.     

A prospective randomized-controlled trial of ventricular fibrillation detection time in a DDDR ventricular defibrillator. Ventak AV II DR Study Investigators

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) with dual chamber and dual chamber rate responsive pacing may offer hemodynamic advantages for some ICD patients. Separate ICDs and DDDR pacemakers can result in device to device interactions, inappropriate shocks, and underdetection of ventricular fibrillation (VF). The objectives of this study were to compare the VF detection times between the Ventak AV II DR and the Ventak AV during high rate DDDR and DDD pacing and to test the safety of dynamic ventricular refractory period shortening. Patients receiving an ICD were randomized in a paired comparison to pacing at 150 beats/min (DDD pacing) or 175 beats/min (DDDR pacing) during ICD threshold testing to create a "worst case scenario" for VF detection. The VF detection rate was set to 180 beats/min, and VF was induced during high rate pacing with alternating current. The device was then allowed to detect and treat VF. The induction was repeated for each patient at each programmed setting so that all patients were tested at both programmed settings. Paired analysis was performed. Patient characteristics were a mean age of 69 +/- 11 years, 78% were men, coronary artery disease was present in 85%, and a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.34 +/- 0.11. Fifty-two episodes of VF were induced in 26 patients. Despite the high pacing rate, all VF episodes were appropriately detected. The mean VF detection time was 2.4 +/- 1.0 seconds during DDD pacing and 2.9 +/- 1.9 seconds during DDDR pacing (P = NS). DDD and DDDR programming resulted in appropriate detection of all episodes of VF with similar detection times despite the "worst case scenario" tested. Delays in detection may be seen with long programmed ventricular refractory periods which shorten the VF sensing window and may be avoided with dynamic ventricular refractory period shortening.     

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Events in Patients with Asymptomatic Nonsustained Ventricular Tachycardia:

Primary prevention trials have demonstrated that patients with coronary disease, reduced left ventricular function, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) have improved survival with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy, presumably secondary to effective termination of life-threatening arrhythmias. However, stored intracardiac electrograms were not always available and specific arrhythmias leading to ICD therapy were not always known. We examined the occurrence of ICD events in 51 consecutive patients who match the described patient profile to determine the frequency of appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapy. ICD detections were noted in 18 (35%) patients during a median follow-up period of 13.1 months. Appropriate therapy for sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) occurred in 11 (22%) patients, with appropriate shocks in 8 (16%) patients and appropriate antitachycardia pacing (ATP) in 4 (8%) patients. The time to first appropriate therapy occurred at a mean of 17 +/- 12 months (median 18 months, range 3-36 months). Inappropriate therapy occurred in 5 (10%) patients with inappropriate shocks in 4 patients and inappropriate ATP in 2 patients. Inappropriate therapy was delivered for supraventricular arrhythmias (SVAs) in 4 patients and for T wave oversensing in 1 patient. The reason for shock therapy was unknown in 1 patient (2%) due to ICD malfunction. The mean arrhythmia rate leading to appropriate therapy for VT/VF was 232 +/- 72 beats/min (range 181-400 beats/min), and the mean rate leading to inappropriate therapy for SVT was 168 +/- 10 beats/min (range 160-180 beats/min). Patients with coronary disease and asymptomatic NSVT commonly receive appropriate defibrillator therapy. These results support the need for ICD implantation for primary prevention, with attention to careful programming of the detection rate to prevent inappropriate therapy.     

Ventricular Fibrillation Induction Using Nonsynchronized Low Energy External Shock During Rapid Ventricular Pacing: Method of Induction When Fibrillation Mode of ICD Fails

Third-generation implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are frequently implanted with non-thoracotomy systems and provide noninvasive methods for electrical stimulation and ventricular fibrillation induction. These modalities facilitate postoperative testing of the ICD. Rapid right ventricular burst pacing via the defibrillator is commonly used for initiation of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, with the available third-generation devices, ventricular fibrillation (VF) induction may be impossible in up to 19% of the patients. In these cases, transvenous placement of a right ventricular catheter has been required to generate VF and appropriately evaluate the device. We report a new technique of noninvasive induction of VF using a low energy external nonsynchronized shock delivered during ICD fibrillation induction pacing. In three patients, after all efforts to induce VF by the Ventritex Cadence V-100 had failed, a 20 J nonsynchronized shock was delivered during rapid RV pacing. This resulted in VF on the first attempt in all patients. This noninvasive technique of VF initiation may provide a useful clinical approach to ICD testing that eliminates the costs and risks of an invasive procedure.     

Ventricular Arrhythmia Inducibility Predicts Subsequent ICD Activation in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients: A DEFINITE Substudy

Objectives: We evaluated whether electrophysiologic (EP) inducibility predicts the subsequent occurrence of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in the Defibrillators in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation (DEFINITE) trial.
Background: Inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias has been widely used as a risk marker to select implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) candidates, but is believed not to be predictive in nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients.
Methods: In DEFINITE, patients randomized to the ICD arm, but not the conventional arm, underwent noninvasive EP testing via the ICD shortly after ICD implantation using up to three extrastimuli at three cycle lengths plus burst pacing. Inducibility was defined as monomorphic or polymorphic VT or VF lasting 15 seconds. Patients were followed for a median of 29 ± 14 months (interquartile range = 2–41). An independent committee, blinded to inducibility status, characterized the rhythm triggering ICD shocks.
Results: Inducibility, found in 29 of 204 patients (VT in 13, VF in 16), was associated with diabetes (41.4% vs 20.6%, P = 0.014) and a slightly higher ejection fraction (23.2 ± 5.9 vs 20.5 ± 5.7, P = 0.021). In follow-up, 34.5% of the inducible group (10 of 29) experienced ICD therapy for VT or VF or arrhythmic death versus 12.0% (21 of 175) noninducible patients (hazard ratio = 2.60, P = 0.014).
Conclusions: In DEFINITE patients, inducibility of either VT or VF was associated with an increased likelihood of subsequent ICD therapy for VT or VF, and should be one factor considered in risk stratifying nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients.     

Initial Clinical Experience with a New Small Sized Third-Generation Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: Results of a Multicenter Study

This study reports the acute clinical experience with the new CPI VENTAK MINI: a small sized (68 cc), implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) with 33 J stored energy. Implantation of the device was attempted in 113 patients (90 men, mean age 57 ± 16 years, 64 with coronary artery disease, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 41%) with ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (VF). All 113 patients (100%) were ultimately implanted, 12% of them for ICD replacement. Transvenous lead implantation was accomplished in all 104 patients (100%) receiving new leads, 95% of them with a single lead configuration. The safety criteria for implantation (2 consecutive VF conversions at 15 J or 3 at 20 J. in both cases without failures to convert) were demonstrated in all but 7 patients (6%). In 6 of these, safety criteria were not fully assessed while in the last patient defibriliation efficacy was not determined. Of the 104 patients with new leads, 90% underwent pectoral implantation. Of the 9 patients (9%) abdominally implanted, only 4 (4%) (3 children) were judged small sized for pectoral implant. At predischarge testing, reliable VF detection and conversion were noted in 96 of 97 patients tested. There was no perioperative mortality. At a 3.6 ± 1.3 months follow-up, 34% of the patients had a spontaneous arrhythmic event, and 24% of the patients received shocks. Clinically inappropriate therapies occurred in 8% of the episodes in which any kind of therapy was delivered. This study demonstrates the short-term clinical efficacy and safety of the new device, and that pectoral implantation can be performed in the large majority of patients.     

Antitachycardia pacing for spontaneous rapid ventricular tachycardia in patients with prophylactic cardioverter-defibrillator therapy

AIMS: Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) has not routinely been used in patients who received implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) for primary prevention of sudden death. This study investigated the efficacy of empirical ATP to terminate rapid ventricular tachycardia (VT) in heart failure patients with prophylactic ICD therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ninety-three patients with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 22 +/- 7% (range: 9-35%) due to nonischemic or ischemic cardiomyopathy received prophylactic ICDs with empiric ATP. At least 2 ATP sequences with 6-pulse burst pacing trains at 81% of VT cycle length (CL) were programmed in one or two VT zones for CL below 335 +/- 23 ms and above 253 +/- 18 ms. Ventricular flutter and fibrillation (VF) with CL below 253 +/- 18 ms were treated in a separate VF zone with ICD shocks without preceding ATP attempts. During 38 +/- 27 months follow-up, 339 spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias occurred in 36 of 93 study patients (39%). A total of 232 VT episodes, mean CL 293 +/- 22 ms, triggered ATP in 25 of 36 patients with ICD interventions (69%). ATP terminated 199 of 232 VT episodes (86%) with a mean CL of 294 +/- 23 ms in 23 of 25 patients (88%) who received ATP therapy. ATP failed to terminate or accelerated 33 of 232 VT episodes (14%) with a mean CL of 287 +/- 19 ms in 12 of 25 patients (48%) who received ATP therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Painfree termination of rapid VT with empirical ATP is common in heart failure patients with prophylactic ICD therapy. The occasional inability of empiric ATP to terminate rapid VT in almost 50% of patients who receive ATP for rapid VT warrants restrictive ICD programming with regard to the number of ATP attempts in order to avoid syncope before VT termination occurs.     

Combined Third-Generation Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator with Permanent Unipolar Pacemakers: Preliminary Observations

As implantable Cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are strictly contraindicated in the presence of unipolar pacemakers, currently available options in patients having such chronic pacing systems include: abandoning the implanted pacemaker and selecting an ICD with ventricular demand (VVI) pacing; or replacing the chronic (dual chamber) unipolar pacing system with a dedicated bipolar version prior to ICD implantation. In three patients with previously implanted unipolar pacemakers, we challenged the premise that all ICD systems are incompatible by combining with a third-generation transvenous ICD system (Medtronic 7217B PCD® incorporating true bipolar sensing, a self-limiting auto-adjusting sensitivity, and a tolerant VF detection algorithm. The potential for pace-maker-ICD interaction was minimized by separating the tip of the ICDs transvenous right ventricular pace/sense-defihrillation coil lead from that of the chronic pacemaker lead by > 2–3 cm, and by performing “worst case” intraoperative testing. Although ICD double-counting of the dual chamber pacemaker's atrial and ventricular pacing spikes could be provoked at extreme high output settings, it did not occur at clinically appropriate settings. More importantly, continuous high output asynchronous pacing during ventricular fibrillation (VF) did not interfere with ICD detection. During a mean follow-up period of 18 months, one patient has had VF appropriately terminated bv the ICD. In the remaining two patients, proper VF detection and ICD function was reassessed at 3 months and/or at 1 year during noninvasive testing. Conclusion: These preliminary findings demonstrate that this transvenous ICD system's VF sensing and detection features combined with careful implant technique, rigorous “worst case” testing for possible pacemaker-ICD interaction with regular follow-up, may permit implantation of this ICD system in patients with chronic unipolar pacing systems. Further studies are needed to validate the long-term clinical safety of this promising revised approach to a currently contraindicated device combination.     

植入型心律转复除颤器的临床应用及随访观察

目的 :观察我院 8例次植入型心律转复除颤器 (implantablecardioveterdefibrillatorICD)患者的临床疗效及随访情况。方法 :自 1996年 7月至 2 0 0 3年 9月 ,共有 7例患者 (其中 1例更换 1次 )在我院成功安装了ICD。 4例为扩张型心肌病 ,1例为长QT间期综合症 ,1例为多形性室性心     

Is Defibrillation Testing Safe?

Determination of defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) and implantable cardioverter defibrillalur (ICD) testing requires repeated inductions of ventricular fibrillation (VF) and defibrillation attempts using known energy outputs. Little is known about the individual and cumulative effects of repetitive brief episodes of VF and hypoperfusion on cerebral function. The potential clinical utility of quantitative electroencephalographic (QEEG) monitoring during intraoperative ICD testing, by using processed 19-channel EEG (0.5–35 Hz bandwidth), was examined in ten anesthetized patients, five males and five females (mean age 62 ± 10 years), who underwent ICD implantation and testing. Ischemic QEEG patterns were defined as those with a 3 standard deviation increase (P < 0.01) in absolute delta (1.5–3.5 Hz) power persisting for ≥ 2.5 minutes. The majority (80%) of the VF episodes (70) were accompanied by QEEG "slowing" (doubling of the pre-VF low frequency delta waves amplitude). All the patients (5/5) experiencing > 6 VF episodes showed a statistically significant increase in the low frequency amplitude. In contrast, this EEG abnormality was apparent in only one of five patients experiencing < 6 VF episodes. These results suggest a cumulative QEEG depression associated with ICD testing. QEEG may provide an objective means for establishing an individualized upper safe limit of DFT testing and the total number of induced VF episodes.     

The Mean Ventricular Fibrillation Cycle Length: A Potentially Useful Parameter for Programming Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

In programming the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), the ventricular tachycardia (VT) detection cycle length (CL) is based on the CL of the documented tachycardia but the ventricular fibrillation (VF) detection CL is set arbitrarily. Appropriate programming of VF detection may not only reduce the incidence of inappropriate ICD shocks for non-VF rhythms but can also avoid the fatal underdetection of VF. The mean VFCL may provide a useful parameter for optimal ICD programming for VF detection if it is reproducible. This study examined the intrapatient reproducibility and interpatient variation of the mean VFCL in 30 ICD patients (25 men and 5 women, mean age 63 ± 13 years). A total of 210 VF episodes (7 ± 4 per patient, range 3–17) induced by T-wave shocks (166) or AC (44) at the ICD implant (30 patients) and the predischarge test (12 of 30 patients) were analyzed. The mean VFCL was calculated from the stored V-V intervals in the ICDs. Although the mean VFCL varied significantly from 171 ± 6 to 263 ± 11 ms (P < 0.01) among different patients, it was reproducible among different VF episodes in an individual patient (maximal variation 4–50 ms, P > 0.05). The mean VFCL was not significantly different between patients with and without antiarrhythmic drugs (210 ± 32 vs 210 ± 23 ms, P > 0.05) and was correlated with the ventricular effective refractory period (r = 0.5, P < 0.05). The mean VFCL varies greatly among different patients but remains reproducible in an individual patient, suggesting that the mean VFCL may serve as a reference for ICD programming of VF detection.     

Late Gadolinium Enhancement in Patients with Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy

One‐third of all patients with heart failure have nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDM). Five‐year mortality from NIDM is as high as 20% with sudden cardiac death (SCD) as the cause in 30% of the deaths. Currently, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is used as the main criteria to risk stratify patients requiring an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) to prevent SCD. However, LVEF does not necessarily reflect myocardial propensity for electrical instability leading to ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). Due to the differential risk in various subgroups of patients for arrhythmic death, it is important to identify appropriate patients for ICD implantation so that we can optimize healthcare resources and avoid the complications of ICDs in individuals who are unlikely to benefit. We performed a systematic search and review of clinical trials of NIDM and the use of ICDs and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) for risk stratification. LGE identifies patients with NIDM who are at high risk for SCD and enables optimized patient selection for ICD placement, while the absence of LGE may reduce the need for ICD implantation in patients with NIDM who are at low risk for future VF/VT or SCD.     

Late Retesting of System Performance in ICD Patients Without Spontaneous Shocks

One hundred five implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients (71 ± 9 years of age, 83% men) without spontaneous ICD discharges for ≥ 12 months were tested to assess high voltage (HV) circuit integrity and the system's ability to recognize and terminate ventricular fibrillation (VF). Indications for ICD implantation were sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) (35%), cardiac arrest (27%), and inducible VT (38%). Eighty-two percent of the patients had coronary artery disease (CAD), and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 36%± 13%. Results: One hundred patients had inducible VF and five did not. Testing led to ICD reprogramming in 50 (49%) patients. Two (1.9%) patients required ICD replacement: (1) a 45-year-old patient with a Ventritex 110 ICD implanted for 13 months interfaced with a CPI 0062 lead implanted for 46 months could not be defibrillated internally (impedance nonmeasurable); (2) an 82-year-old patient with a 23-month-old Medtronic 7219 ICD interfaced with 6936 and 6933 leads whose defibrillation threshold (DFT) had doubled since implantation (24 J from 12 J). Lead fractures were found in both cases (proximal coil of the 0062, and subcutaneously in the 6933). Based on DFT determinations, the first shock output was programmed lower in 37 patients and higher in 10 patients. Shock pulse width was changed in one patient and the ventricular refractory period in another. No programming changes were made in 54 (51%) patients. Conclusions: (1) Late testing of HV circuit integrity in ICD patients without an ICD shock in ≥ 12 months identifies previously unsuspected HV lead fractures; (2) chronic DFT testing resulted in HV output reprogramming in one-half of the patients.     

Efficacy of metoprolol and sotalol in the prevention of recurrences of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator

ICDs provide protection against sudden cardiac death in patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Nevertheless, most ICD recipients receive adjunctive antiarrhythmic drug therapy to reduce the number of recurrent episodes and ICD discharges. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of metoprolol and d,l-sotalol in preventing VT/VF recurrences in patients with an ICD in a prospective, randomized trial. One hundred patients (83 men, 17 women; mean age 59 years, SD +/- 11 years) were randomized to receive metoprolol or sotalol after implantation of an ICD. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to age, sex, underlying cardiac disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, NYHA class assessment and clinical arrhythmia. The median follow-up was 728 days (25th percentile: 530 days, 75th percentile: 943 days) in the metoprolol group and 727 days (25th percentile: 472 days, 75th percentile: 1,223 days) in the sotalol group (P = 0.52). Thirty-three patients treated with metoprolol and 30 patients receiving sotalol had at least one episode during the follow-up. Event-free survival curves were generated for the two treatment arms using the Kaplan-Meier method and showed no significant difference (P = 0.68). Eight patients treated with metoprolol and six patients treated with sotalol died during follow-up. Total mortality was not significantly different between the two study groups (P = 0.43). Metoprolol is as efficacious as sotalol in preventing VT/VF recurrences in patients with an ICD.     

Safety and Diagnostic Yield of Noninvasive Ventricular Stimulation Performed Via Tiered Therapy Implantable Defibrillators

Extensive electrophysiological testing is critical for the effective utilization of sophisticated tachycardia detection and termination algorithms available in tiered therapy ICDs. To evaluate the safety and diagnostic yield of electrophysiological testing via noninvasive ventricular stimulation, we performed 294 electrophysiological studies in 154 patients (age 65 ± 10; left ventricular ejection fraction 0.36 ± 0.15) with tiered therapy ICDs. Stimulation was performed under methohexital anesthesia. A total of 928 sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias were induced (3.1 ± 2.5 per procedure); monomorphic VT, 550; ventricular flutter, 74; and VF, 246. The results of invasive and noninvasive programmed stimulation were compared for 79 patients wbo had both studies under similar treatment. Overall concordance iras 83%, and did not differ significantly between patients who bad the noninvasive stimulation via epicardial or endocardial pacing leads. VF could be induced in 206 of 257 studies (82%), and it was less likely to be induced in patients on amiodarone (74% vs 85%; P = 0.02), or beta blockers (55% vs 83%; P = 0.017). No patient presented a serious complication. Minor complications occurred during 39 studies; transient laryngospasm in 1, unintended delivery of an ICD sbock to a conscious patient in 4; induction of sustained atrial fibrillation in 8; need for external rescue defibrillation sbocks in 13; and delivery of inappropriate sbocks for supraventricular rhythms in 14 studies. Noninvasive ventricular stimulation performed under methobexital anestbesia is safe. Its diagnostic yield compares favorably with that of conventional electropbysiological studies. VF can be induced in a majority of patients. There is good correlation between invasive and noninvasive programmed stimulation for induction of VT. Noninvasive ventricular stimulation may emerge as standard procedure for the initial programming and follow-up of ICDs.     

Shock on T versus direct current voltage for induction of ventricular fibrillation: a randomized prospective comparison

VF is induced during ICD implantation to determine efficacy of therapy. Establishing the best clinical method of induction of VF would potentially be beneficial in reducing the number of induction attempts and reducing the frequency of inadvertent induction of VT. Commonly used methods to induce VF include shock in the T wave vulnerable period (T shock) and high frequency stimulation. This study compared the efficacy of T shock with a new induction method using a 9-V DC pulse. The study was a randomized, prospective, case crossover trial in patients receiving ICDs. VF was induced by T shock and DC in a randomized sequence during an ICD implant. VF was induced at least four times in each patient (two T shocks and two DC inductions) and with each induction; attempts were continued with modifications until successful. A paired evaluation between the T shock/DC induction was performed in 37 patients (28 men, age 64 +/- 12 years) with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.40 +/- 0.20. Arrhythmia indications were VT (n = 23), VF (n = 10), and VT/VF (n = 4). Drug therapy included amiodarone (n = 10), metoprolol (n = 6), digoxin (n = 1), and lidocaine (n = 1). The average T shock voltage was 207.0 +/- 16.1 V. The S1 cycle drive length was consistently 400 ms, and the mean S2 coupling interval was 317.8 +/- 19.6 ms. The length of time DC applied averaged 3.8 +/- 1.4 seconds. A total of 148 episodes of VF were included in the analysis. T shock induced VF with a cycle length of 213.5 +/- 35.1 ms, and DC induced VF with a cycle length of 214.6 +/- 34.5 ms (P = 0.86). Although VF was eventually induced for each randomization, the number of attempts required were dependent on the method of induction. The successful DC first attempt VF induction rate was 96%, with three patients requiring two attempts during one of the DC inductions. T shock had a 68% first attempt success rate with 21 patients requiring multiple T shocks to induce VF. All nine female patients had at least one unsuccessful first attempt T shock, which contributed to an overall unsuccessful first attempt induction rate significantly higher in women then men (36.1% vs 12.5%, P = 0.001). A constant DC voltage induction of VF may be more effective than T shock for induction of VF in a clinical setting because it reduces the number of attempts required to induce VF. By either method, VF appears to be more difficult to induce in women. DC induction has the advantage of simple programming of only duration of stimulation. These findings have implications particularly for ICD implantation with conscious sedation.     

Intracardiac Emergency Defibrillation for Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation During Implantation of Cardioverter Defibrillators with Nonthoracotomy Lead Systems

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are being implanted in increasing numbers. At inlraoperative defibrillation threshold tests refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF) requiring emergency open chest resuscitation is a major concern during impiantation of nonthoracotomy ICD lead systems. A new method of high energy endocardial/extrathoracic defibrillotion via the implanted ICD transvenous defibrillation electrode (TDE) was used to terminate refractory VF. During implantation of ICD with TDE in 20 patients refractory VF occurred in two patients. The arrhythmia was terminated with endocardial/extrathoracic defibrillation in both cases, and no complications were observed.     

埋藏式自动心脏复律除颤器治疗恶性室性心律失常

目的观察埋藏式心脏自动复律除颤器(ICD)在治疗恶性室性心律失常中的作用。方法回顾性分析三例恶性室性心律失常患者植入单腔ICD后的长期随访结果。结果在随访的20~37个月中,2例患者长期继续服用抗心律失常药物,1例患者行射频消融治疗;ICD存储数据显示共发生室性心律失常事件172阵次,共启动抗心动过速起搏(ATP)治疗170次,成功158次(成功率92.9%);实施高能量放电12次,其中4次为房颤伴快速心室率所致的不恰当治疗;非持续性室速发作2次,因其持续时间未达到室速诊断的初始识别时间就自行停止未启动ICD治疗程序。结论ICD是治疗恶性室性心律失常,预防心脏猝死有效方法。术后定期随访,及时调整ICD的工作参数,可提高ICD治疗的成功率。     

Outcomes and in-hospital treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation by early defibrillation

OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate the in-hospital treatment of ventricular arrhythmias and underlying structural heart disease in patients who survive ventricular fibrillation (VF) out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in a region with a high survival rate after hospital discharge. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included all patients presenting in Olmsted County, Minnesota, who had experienced OHCA between November 1990 and December 2000 and who underwent defibrillation of VF by an emergency medical service system. RESULTS: Of 200 patients who experienced VF arrest, 138 (69%) survived to hospital admission (7 died in the emergency department before admission), and 79 (40%) were discharged. Of patients who were discharged, 37 (47%) had a reversible cause of the arrest (perimyocardial infarction) and received treatment of the primary process. The other 42 patients who were discharged had ischemic coronary heart disease (CHD) (n=25), nonischemic CHD (n=10), or idiopathic VF (n=7). Four of the patients with CHD but no left ventricular dysfunction were treated with coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention alone. A total of 52 patients (66%) were candidates for electrophysiologic testing. Of these patients, 48 (92%) underwent electrophysiologic testing; of these patients, 10 received amiodarone alone, and 35 received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (of whom 3 also received amiodarone). Patients who did not receive ICD therapy typically presented before 1998 with CHD and underwent coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention only. Of 79 patients who were discharged, 14 (18%) with an ICD have received subsequent shocks. Nineteen (24%) of 79 patients have died, 5 of a primary cardiac etiology (including 2 with repeated OHCA). CONCLUSIONS: The VF OHCA survival rate is high in the setting of rapid defibrillation, with 40% of patients being discharged from the hospital. By the end of the 10-year study, more patients were receiving antiarrhythmic therapy, in particular ICD implantation, after hospital admission. Overall, the long-term survival in patients with VF OHCA is favorable.