Two-year safety and effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents (from a prospective registry)

Uncertainty exists about the long-term safety and efficacy outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) in unselected patients. The present study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the SES in treatment of patients with coronary artery disease in an unselected population. Over a 2-year period, 1,504 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with ≥1 SES were enrolled. The primary end point was the occurrence of target vessel failure (TVF; a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization). An independent clinical event committee adjudicated all adverse events up to 2-year follow-up. Dual antiplatelet therapy was recommended for ≥1 year throughout the study period. Mean age was 65 ± 11 years; 75% were men, and 34% were diabetics. SESs were implanted for off-label indications in 86% of cases. TVF rates were 3.3%, 6.9%, 11.5%, and 15.5% at 30-day, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-ups, respectively. The 2-year cumulative rate of definite/probable stent thrombosis was 0.9%; 0.2% was very late thrombosis, occurring from 1 year to 2 years. Patients off dual antiplatelet therapy at 6 months had a significantly increased rate of subsequent death from noncardiac causes. Patients off dual antiplatelet therapy at 1 year had a significantly decreased rate of subsequent clinically driven target lesion revascularization. In conclusion, use of SESs in unselected patients with coronary artery disease was associated with a low TVF rate at 2 years with an acceptable incidence of stent thrombosis.     

Impact of final stent dimensions on long-term results following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: serial intravascular ultrasound analysis from the sirius trial

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the predictive value of minimum stent area (MSA) for long-term patency of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) implantation compared to bare metal stents (BMS). BACKGROUND: Although MSA is a consistent predictor of in-stent restenosis, its predictive value in BMS is still limited because of biologic variability in the restenosis process. METHODS: From the SIRolImUS (SIRIUS) trial, 122 cases (SES: 72; BMS: 50) with complete serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) (baseline and 8-month follow-up) were analyzed. Postprocedure MSA and follow-up minimum lumen area (MLA) were obtained. Based on previous physiologic studies, adequate stent patency at follow-up was defined as MLA >4 mm(2). RESULTS: In both groups, a significant positive correlation was observed between baseline MSA and follow-up MLA (SES: p < 0.0001, BMS: p < 0.0001). However, SES showed higher correlation than BMS (0.8 vs. 0.65) with a higher regression coefficient (0.92 vs. 0.59). The sensitivity and specificity curves identified different optimal thresholds of MSA to predict adequate follow-up MLA: 5 mm(2) for SES and 6.5 mm(2) for BMS. The positive predictive values with these cutoff points were 90% and 56%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this SIRIUS IVUS substudy, SES reduced both biologic variability and restenosis, resulting in increased predictability of long-term stent patency with postprocedure MSA. In addition, SES had a considerably lower optimal MSA threshold compared to BMS.     

雷帕霉素洗脱支架对糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的远期影响

目的分析雷帕霉素洗脱支架(SES)对糖尿病患经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的远期影响。方法采用回顾性研究方法,在1004．例接受冠状动脉内支架术治疗的冠心病患中,84例糖尿病和250例非糖尿病患置入SES;168例糖尿病和502例非糖尿病患置入普通支架。记录并比较一般临床资料、冠状动脉造影及冠状动脉内支架术情况、远期心脏事件发生率和1年无心脏事件生存率。结果随访期间(平均16．2个月),SES组中糖尿病亚组和非糖尿病亚组的远期心脏事件发生率为4．8％比3．6％,P=0．744;1年无心脏事件生存率为95．0％比96．7％,P=0．602,两亚组差异均无统计学意义。但BMS组中,糖尿病亚组的远期心脏事件发生率显高于非糖尿病组(31.0%比21．7％,P=0．015);两亚组的1年无心脏事件生存率分别为74．2％比86．8％(P=0．001)。结论SES能显改善糖尿病患冠状动脉支架术的远期疗效,降低靶病变再狭窄和远期心脏事件的发生率,提高1年无心脏事件生存率。     

Comparative clinical outcomes of paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents: results from a large prospective multicenter registry--STENT Group.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the 9-month clinical outcomes of patients treated with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) or sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) for coronary artery stenosis. BACKGROUND: The STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies) registry is the first multicenter registry in the U.S. to collect long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents from "real-world" practice. METHODS: Data on all percutaneous coronary interventions in 8 U.S. hospital centers were collected in the STENT registry between 2003 and 2005. In this prospective, nonrandomized, observational study, the choice of procedures was at the physicians' discretion. Patients who only received a PES (n = 4,671) or SES (n = 4,555) and completed 9-month follow-up (93.8% of eligible) were included for analysis. Primary end points were death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 9 months. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (any of the 3 primary end points) and stent thrombosis. RESULTS: At 9 months, death, MI, and TVR occurred in 2.2%, 2.0%, and 4.1%, respectively, of the PES group and 2.5%, 2.2%, and 4.3%, respectively, of the SES group (p = NS); MACE occurred in 7.5% of the PES group and 8.0% of the SES group (p = 0.37). After adjustments for group differences in baseline characteristics, TVR (hazard ratio [HR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 1.32; p = 0.26) and MACE (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.12; p = 0.56) were similar for PES and SES. Stent thrombosis at 9 months occurred in 0.7% of both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that clinical restenosis and MACE events after PES and SES procedures in "real-world" patients are infrequent and similar at 9 months.     

One-year results of the SCORPIUS study: a German multicenter investigation on the effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents in diabetic patients.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to analyze the effectiveness of drug-eluting stents in a high-risk group of diabetic patients. Previously, this had been analyzed only in substudies of larger trials or in clinical investigations enrolling a small number of patients. BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stents are highly effective in reducing the rate of in-stent restenosis. METHODS: Two hundred patients with diabetes and de novo coronary artery lesions were enrolled in 16 centers: 98 were randomly assigned to sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and 102 received bare-metal stents (BMS). The primary end point was in-segment late luminal loss. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rate was analyzed at 30 days and 8 and 12 months. RESULTS: The extent of in-segment late luminal loss in the SES group was 0.18 mm compared with 0.74 mm in the BMS group. In-segment restenosis was identified on follow-up angiography in 8.8% of the patients in SES and in 42.1% in BMS (p < 0.0001). Target lesion revascularization was performed in 5.3% of the patients in SES and in 21.1% of the patients in BMS (p = 0.002). The SES was effective in the treatment group with oral diabetic medication as well as in the insulin-dependent treatment group (3.6% SES vs. 38.8% BMS). There was no subacute stent thrombosis in the SES group up to 1 year. The MACE rate was not significantly different at 30 days. At 12 months, MACE rate was 14.7% in SES versus 35.8% in BMS. CONCLUSIONS: The SES is safe and highly effective in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease and associated with a significant decrease in the extent of late luminal loss.     

Predictors of edge stenosis following sirolimus-eluting stent deployment (a quantitative intravascular ultrasound analysis from the SIRIUS trial)

To study the interaction of the sirolimus-eluting stent and vessel margins, we analyzed the intravascular ultrasound parameters in 317 edges of 167 stents having 18 edge stenoses at 8 months of follow-up from the SIRIUS trial. Of the baseline parameters, a larger reference percentage of plaque area and a larger edge stent area/reference minimum lumen area were associated with edge stenosis in the sirolimus-eluting stent cohort compared with the incidence of edge stenosis in the bare metal stent cohort. Thus, full lesion coverage and matching the stented segment properly to the adjacent segment using intravascular ultrasound guidance may improve sirolimus-eluting stent implantation efficacy further.     

Incidence and predictors of target vessel revascularization and clinical event rates of the sirolimus-eluting coronary stent (results from the prospective multicenter German Cypher Stent Registry)

Randomized trials have demonstrated the ability of drug-eluting stents to decrease the risk of restenosis after coronary stent implantation. However, the incidences of major cardiovascular/cerebral adverse events (MACCEs) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) during follow-up in a routine clinical setting remain to be determined. We analyzed data of the multicenter German Cypher Stent Registry. From April 2002 to March 2003, 1,726 patients at 93 hospitals who received >/=1 sirolimus-eluting coronary stent were included. Median follow-up was 6.7 months. During follow-up, death occurred in 1.2% of patients (20 of 1,726), nonfatal myocardial infarction in 2.5% (43 of 1,706), and nonfatal stroke in 0.5% (7 of 1,469). TVR was performed in 8.6% of patients, with percutaneous coronary intervention in 7.3% and coronary artery bypass grafting in 1.5%. The overall rate of MACCEs or TVR was 10.8% (186 of 1,726). Independent predictors of TVR were the target vessel being a bypass graft (odds ratio [OR] 2.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41 to 4.18, p = 0.001), management of >1 lesion during the same intervention (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.96, p = 0.035), 2- or 3-vessel disease (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.72, p = 0.030), and age (per decade; OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.98, p = 0.025). These data confirm the safety and effectiveness of using the sirolimus-eluting stent in daily clinical practice. The management of bypass grafts and multiple lesions in 1 session and the presence of multivessel disease were predictors of MACCEs or TVR.     

Comparison of effectiveness and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients with diabetes mellitus (from the Italian Multicenter Randomized DESSERT Study)

Few studies directly compared drug-eluting stents and bare-metal stents (BMSs) in diabetic patients. DESSERT was an Italian multicenter randomized trial to show the efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) compared with BMSs in de novo lesions of diabetic patients treated with insulin and/or oral antidiabetics for > or =3 months on top of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. The primary end point was in-stent late lumen loss, assessed using centralized quantitative coronary angiography at 8-month follow-up. Centrally adjudicated composite major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and target-vessel failure (TVF; death, treated vessel-related acute myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization) at 30 days and 9 and 12 months were secondary end points. Seventy-five patients were randomly assigned to an SES (109 lesions), and 75 (109 lesions), to a BMS. The 2 groups were well balanced for clinical, anatomic, and procedural characteristics. In-stent late lumen loss decreased from 0.96 +/- 0.61 mm for BMSs to 0.14 +/- 0.33 for SESs (p <0.001), and in-segment binary restenosis was 38.8% versus 3.6%, respectively (p <0.001). Twelve-month clinical events were significantly lower in the sirolimus group: MACEs 22.1% versus 40% (p = 0.023), target-lesion revascularization 5.9% versus 30% (p <0.001), and TVF 14.7% versus 34.3% (p = 0.008). At multivariate analysis, stent type was confirmed as an independent predictor of in-segment late loss (p <0.001), binary restenosis (p <0.001), 12-month TVF (p = 0.010), and 12-month MACEs (p = 0.037). In conclusion, the randomized DESSERT showed SESs to be safe and effective in decreasing both angiographic parameters of restenosis and incidence of MACEs compared with BMSs in diabetic patients with de novo 1- or 2-vessel coronary stenoses.     

A prospective multicentre registry of the procedural and long-term clinical and angiographic results of stent implantation using a Dylyn coated coronary stent system

OBJECTIVES: A prospective registry was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a Dylyn coated coronary stent.BACKGROUND: Diamond-like nanocomposite (Dylyn) stent coating is thought to be biocompatible, resulting in decreased thrombogenicity and decreased neointimal hyperplasia.METHODS: In a multicentre, open, prospective, clinical and angiographical registry, the Dylyn-coated stent system was evaluated in patients requiring percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary procedural and angiographical endpoint of the study was the sustained success of stent-implantation using a follow-up catheterisation at six months. The primary clinical endpoint of the study was the composite incidence of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and revascularisation at six months after stent implantation. RESULTS: 127 Dylyn coated coronary stents were implanted in 121 patients. Procedural success was obtained in 100% of the cases. No episodes of acute stent thrombosis occurred. The number of patients with instent restenosis at six months was 29 (24%). The primary procedural, angiographical endpoint was achieved in 91 (70%) patients. The clinical results at six-month follow-up were favourable with a MACE-rate of 7.4%. CONCLUSIONS: A Dylyn coated coronary stent system is well tolerated and has excellent short-term results. The amount of angiographic restenosis at 6 months, however, is considerable, but comparable to other non-drug-eluting stent systems. (Int J Cardiovasc Intervent 2004; 6: 137-141)     

Procedural and long-term results of sirolimus-eluting stent in patients at high risk for restenosis

AIM: In-stent restenosis still affects 10-50% of long-term outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Large clinical trials have shown that sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) have reduced restenosis rate to 0-9% in lesions at low-moderate risk. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term clinical and angiographic outcome of SES in a real world population, at very high risk of restenosis. METHODS: Ninety lesions at high risk of restenosis (lesion length >20 mm, target vessel diameter <2.5 mm, in-stent diffuse restenosis, total occlusions and complex lesions on bypass grafts and bifurcations) were treated in 75 patients. A follow-up was scheduled at 6 months. RESULTS: Restenosis rate was 16.6% with a focal pattern of presentation in most cases. Subacute in-stent thrombosis occurred in 2.2%. Resteno-sis occurred mainly in small vessels, diabetic patients and in vessels previously treated with brachytherapy. CONCLUSION: The treatment of lesions at high risk of restenosis with SES is safe with a low restenosis rate at follow-up. An aggressive and prolonged antiplatelet regimen is mandatory because of high subacute in-stent thrombosis rates.