Übersicht und aktuelle Trends in der Narbenhernienchirurgie

Incisional hernias occur in 5-10% of patients who have undergone laparotomy and are associated with high morbidity and significant socioeconomic costs. Techniques for reinforcing and/or replacing the abdominal wall with alloplastic meshes have reduced the recurrence rate in comparison to suture techniques from about 40% to less than 10%. A number of mesh types and surgical repair procedures are available, namely the onlay, inlay, sublay, underlay, and intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) techniques. Evolving strategies include precise criteria for incorporating patient body type, risk factors for recurrence, hernia morphology, and the available biomaterials into the planning of the surgical approach. The authors herein present an overview of the current surgical trends, focusing on mesh reinforcement (sublay technique) and mesh replacement (IPOM technique). Additionally, they review a classification of incisional hernias that is self-explanatory, practicable in routine clinical practice, and based on the cornerstones of morphology, hernia size, and risk factors for recurrence. Evidence for the indications and limitations of the main surgical repair techniques are illustrated and discussed.     

Incisional hernia repair after orthotopic liver transplantation: a technique employing an inlay/onlay polypropylene mesh

Background: The literature provides no data on the incidence and operative management of incisional hernias developing after orthotopic liver transplantation. The use of high-dose immunosuppressive agents results in an appreciable delay in wound healing. There is thus a need for a procedure for the reconstruction of the abdominal wall for patients on immunosuppression. The aim of this retrospective study was to establish the incidence of incisional hernias and an analysis of the results after implantation of a polypropylene mesh in inlay–onlay technique after liver transplantation is given.Methods: The basis for the present retrospective investigations was a total of 207 liver transplantations carried out in 192 patients (15 re-transplantations). After performing tensiometry, a polypropylene mesh (Marlex) was implanted to close the hernias using the inlay/onlay technique or a direct closure of the fascia was done. All treated hernias were followed up for a median of 18 months.Results: Among 184 patients, 17 developed incisional hernias after primary direct closure of the abdominal wall, giving an incidence of 9%. In an additional 8 patients an incisional hernia was seen where an absorbable mesh was used to close the abdominal wall after liver transplantation. In addition, there were 25 incisional hernias after 207 liver transplantations (12%). One of 15 (7%) of the surgically repaired hernias with implantation of a polypropylene mesh (Marlex) developed a recurrence. All the 3 patients after direct apposition of the fascia without using a polypropylene mesh suffered a recurrence (3 of 3; 100%). Significant risk factors for developing an incisional hernia were the amount of ascites and the stay in the ICU after transplantation. Neither severe deep nor superficial wound infection nor bowel fistulas were observed after implantation of a inlay/onlay mesh.Conclusion: In patients after liver transplantation, the implantation of a polypropylene mesh proved to be an efficient and safe method of treating incisional hernias. Implantation of a mesh was not associated with an increased infection rate, despite the use of immunosuppression. In view of the high recurrence rate associated with primary closure, mesh implantation should be given preference.     

Health-related quality of life in patients treated for incisional hernia with an onlay technique

Background  

An incisional hernia is a frequent complication of abdominal surgery. The repair of incisional hernias comes with a high risk of reherniation and serious complications. With the introduction of mesh repair, recurrence rates have decreased and subsequent clinical outcomes have improved. Whereas further research needs to be done to improve complication rates and recurrence, the focus has now been placed on quality-of-life outcomes in patients undergoing these repairs. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term health-related quality of life (HRQL) of patients who were treated for incisional hernias using an onlay technique.     

腹腔镜下腹腔内补片修补术治疗腹壁切口疝的临床研究

目的探讨腹腔镜下腹腔内补片修补术（IPOM）治疗腹壁切口疝的安全性及可行性。 方法回顾性分析2014-2019年中国人民解放军南部战区总医院对103例腹壁切口疝患者实施腹腔镜下IPOM的临床资料,观察其手术时间、术后排气时间、术后住院时间、并发症及复发情况。 结果103例患者均顺利完成手术,平均手术时间、术后排气时间及术后住院时间分别为（100±10）min、（40±8）h及（7.5±1.5）d。术中发现1例合并脐疝同时行脐疝修补,1例合并右侧腹股沟直疝同时行TAPP术,1例嵌顿性肠梗阻并肠坏死同时行肠切除吻合术。术后轻微并发症经短期治疗后痊愈,随访3~24个月,均无切口疝复发。 结论腹腔镜下IPOM治疗腹壁切口疝具有安全、有效、创伤小、可发现隐匿疝、术后康复快、能降低并发症、缩短住院时间、复发率低等优点。     

The use of an underlay polypropylene mesh in complicated incisional hernias: sucessful French surgical technique

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia repair with conventional techniques is associated with high recurrence rates of 30-50%. Surgical repair using different prosthetic biomaterials is becoming increasingly popular. On the basis of the favourable results by French surgeons, the results of underlay prosthetic mesh repair using polypropylene mesh in complicated and recurrent incisional hernias have been studied. METHODS: After preparation and excision of the entire hernia sac, the peritoneum and posterior rectus sheath are closed with a continuous looped polyglyconate suture. The prosthesis used for the midline hernias is positioned on the posterior rectus sheath and extends far beyond the borders of the myoaponeurotic defect. The prosthesis for lumbar and subcostal hernias is placed in a prepared space between the transverse and oblique muscles. Intraperitoneal placement of the mesh must be avoided. Between January 1997 and September 1998 a total of 57 incisional hernia repair (25 primary hernias, 32 recurrent hernias) have been performed using this technique (28 women, 29 men, mean age 56+/-13 years). RESULTS: Local complications occurred in 6 patients (11%). One patient suddenly died on the 3rd postoperative day from severe pulmonary embolism (mortality 1,7%). Thirthy-seven patients with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were reexamined clinically (follow up time 6-33 months). Till now one recurrent hernia has been observed. There were only minor complaints like a feeling of tension in the abdominal wall (n = 3) and slight pain under physical stress (n = 9). CONCLUSIONS: The aforementioned technique of underlay prosthetic repair allows an anatomical and consolidated reconstruction of the damaged abdominal wall with excellent results and low complication rates especially in high risk patients and complicated hernias.     

Retromuskuläre Netzplastik in Deutschland

Since the onset of an incisional hernia is caused by the biological problem of forming stable scar tissue, the mesh techniques are now the methods of choice for incisional hernia repair. Polypropylene is the material most widely used for open mesh repair. New developments have led to low-weight, large-pore polypropylene prostheses, which have been adapted to the physiological requirements of the abdominal wall and permit a reliable tissue integration. These meshes make it possible for a scar net to form rather than a stiff scar plate, thus helping to avoid the complications encountered with the use of earlier meshes. The ideal position for the mesh seems to be the retromuscular underlay position, in which the force of abdominal pressure holds the prosthesis tightly against the deep surface of the muscles. The retromuscular underlay repair technique has yielded the lowest incidence rates for recurrence: around 10% even after long-term follow up. Analysis of the failures after open mesh repair suggests that inadequate size of the mesh with insufficient overlap at the edges is the main reason for recurrence. An overlap of at least 5–6 cm all round must therefore be considered mandatory for successful reinforcement of the abdominal wall. Open mesh repair, particularly with modern low-weight polypropylene meshes applied by the retromuscular underlay technique, offers excellent results in the treatment of incision hernias, even in long-term follow-up studies.     

Early results of various reconstructions of abdominal incisional hernias with Prolene mesh

Authors report on the early results of 127 operations performed for incisional hernias without selection in the last two years. Prolene mesh (in 8 patients with sublay, in 5 with inlay and in 27 with onlay technique) was implanted into the abdominal wall. They examined the wound healing influenced by the various methods of mesh placement. The time of operation, drainage and postoperative stay was shorter, the volume of liquid drained from the wound was less in reconstructions of incisional hernias without mesh. In the group without mesh (n = 87) 4 patients were lost, and wound complications developed in 8.1%. After mesh implantations (n = 40) wound complications occurred in 12.5% of the patients. In 2 patients the mesh had to be removed, then a new one reimplanted. There was no difference in results of various methods of mesh placements. According to their good experiences obtained in operations for incisional hernias, if indicated, the use of a mesh in recommended to avoid recurrences.     

A Randomised Prospective Study to Evaluate Preperitoneal Mesh Repair Versus Onlay Mesh Repair and Laparoscopic IPOM in Incisional Hernia Surgery

Incisional hernia remains a very common postoperative complication. These are encountered with an incidence of up to 20 % following laparotomy. These hernias enlarge over time, making the repair difficult, and serious complications like bowel obstruction, strangulation and enterocutaneous fistula can occur. Hence, elective repair is indicated to avoid these complications. Implantation of a prosthetic mesh is nowadays considered as the standard treatment due to low hernia recurrence. The most common mesh repair techniques used are the onlay repair, sublay repair and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM). However, it is still not clear which technique among the three is superior. A study consisting of 30 patients who underwent incisional hernia repair by onlay, laparoscopic and preperitoneal mesh repair with abdominoplasty was conducted in the Coimbatore Medical College and Hospital. Of the three groups, the preperitoneal repair with abdominoplasty was found to have better patient compliance and satisfaction with regard to occurrence of complications and appearance of the abdominal wall without laxity in a single sitting.     

Sutureless onlay hernia repair: a review of 97 patients

Background

Repair of large ventral/incisional (V/I) hernias is a common problem. Outside of recurrence, other factors such as wound complications and mesh infection can create significant morbidity. Chevrel described the premuscular repair and later modified it by using glue over the midline closure. We previously described our onlay technique using fibrin glue alone in a small case series. The aim of this study is to review the largest case series of sutureless onlay V/I hernia repair whereby mesh is fixated with fibrin glue alone for complex ventral hernias, and how the technique has evolved.

Methods

All patients who underwent onlay V/I hernia repair over a 3-year period were reviewed. Patient demographics, operative details, complications, and follow-up were reviewed.

Results

In total, 97 patients were included. 54.6 % were female, with a mean age of 57.3 years. Mean BMI was 32.2. 23(23.7 %) patients had diabetes. 90 (92.8 %) of the operations were for incisional hernias, 3 (3.1 %) primary ventral hernias, 2 (2.1 %) flank hernias, and 2 (2 %) complex abdominal wall reconstruction. 88 (90.7 %) of the cases were performed on an elective basis. 77 (77.3 %) cases were classified as clean, 21 (21.6 %) clean-contaminated, and 1 (1.0 %) contaminated. The mean defect size was 150 cm². Mean follow-up was 386 days, and maximum was 3.1 years. There were 21 (21.6 %) seromas, 4 (4.1 %) wound infections, 7 (7.4 %) had skin necrosis, and 9 (9.3 %) required re-operation due to a complication. At 3 years, there have been no recurrences or mesh explants.

Conclusions

The sutureless onlay V/I hernia repair with fibrin glue fixation has proven to be durable with a comparable complication profile to other techniques. The most common sequela, seroma, is easily managed in the outpatient setting. This sutureless technique is an effective option for onlay hernia repair that may provide several advantages over traditional suture techniques.

     

Incisional hernia repair in Sweden 2002

Incisional hernia is a common problem after abdominal surgery. The complication and recurrence rates following the different repair techniques are a matter of great concern. Our aim was to study the results of incisional hernia repair in Sweden. A questionnaire was sent to all surgical departments in Sweden requesting data concerning incisional hernia repair performed during the year 2002. Eight hundred and sixty-nine incisional hernia repairs were reported from 40 hospitals. Specialist surgeons performed the repair in 782 (83.8%) patients. The incisional hernia was a recurrence in 148 (17.0%) patients. Thirty-three per cent of the hernias were subsequent to transverse, subcostal or muscle-splitting incisions or laparoscopic procedures. Suture repair was performed in 349 (40.2%) hernias. Onlay mesh repair was more common than a sublay technique. The rate of wound infection was 9.6% after suture repair and 8.1% after mesh repair. The recurrence rate was 29.1% with suture repair, 19.3% with onlay mesh repair, and 7.3% with sublay mesh repair. This survey revealed that there is room for improvement regarding the incisional hernia surgery in Sweden. Suture repair, with its unacceptable results, is common and mesh techniques employed may not be optimal. This study has led to the instigation of a national incisional hernia register.     

Improved Outcomes in the Management of High-Risk Incisional Hernias Utilizing Biological Mesh and Soft-Tissue Reconstruction: A Single Center Experience

Introduction

Repair of incisional hernias is complex in the setting of previous/current infection, loss of domain and bowel involvement, and is often on the background of significant co-morbidities. Reported repair techniques are associated with significant morbidity and led our unit to develop a novel technique for complex incisional hernia repair.

Methods

A retrospective case notes review of all high-risk (Ventral Hernia Working Group grade 2–4) incisional hernia repairs was undertaken. Standardized repair involved resection of attenuated soft tissue and hernia sac (bioburden reduction), component separation (where necessary), intra-peritoneal Strattice? biological mesh insertion, midline fascial closure, and soft-tissue reconstruction, performed in combination with a plastic surgeon as a single-stage procedure.

Results

A total of 58 patients underwent hernia repair between February 2009 and September 2012 (median age 59 years; 59 % female). Eleven patients (19 %) were grade 4, 19 (33 %) were grade 3, and 28 (48 %) were grade 2. Nineteen (33 %) were recurrent hernias, and midline fascial closure was achieved in 52 (90 %). Early complications included 15 (26 %) surgical-site occurrences, three (5 %) respiratory complications, two (3 %) cardiac complications, and two (3 %) urinary tract infections. Follow-up has revealed three (5 %) asymptomatic hernia recurrences and no patients requiring mesh explantation.

Conclusions

This technique was associated with a low risk of surgical site occurrences and hernia recurrence, with no requirements for mesh explantation. Repair of such complex incisional hernias remains challenging, and further randomized controlled trials are required to elucidate the optimal method of closure and mesh type.     

Incisional hernia—comparison of mesh repair with Cardiff repair: an university hospital experience

Background: Incisional hernia is a frequent complication of abdominal surgery. Various types of repair are recommended for incisional hernia. Suture and mesh repair are compared in the present study. Method: One hundred seventy one patients with incisional hernia underwent Cardiff repair (far and near sutures with reinforcement sutures) which was used as an open suture repair while onlay polypropylene mesh was used in the mesh repair technique. Result: Cardiff repair was performed in 116 patients with no mortality with recurrence in two patients with mean follow up of 7.1 years. Both these patients with recurrence had a defect measuring more than 10 cm in width. Mesh repair was carried out in 55 patients with no recurrence in mean follow up of 37 months. Seroma formation was noted in 7 (12.72%) with mesh repair as compared to 4 (3.44%) patients with Cardiff repair. Conclusion: We recommend Cardiff repair for primary and small to medium size incisional hernias. Onlay polypropylene mesh is ideal for tension-free hernia repair, recurrent incisional hernia and hernia defects wider than 10 cm.     

应用合成补片修补腹壁切口疝的经验总结

目的:探讨腹壁切口疝病人的无张力手术治疗方法和疗效.方法:回顾性分析我院2000年7月至2008年6月间收治的215例应用合成补片修补腹壁切口疝病人的临床资料.结果:215例中101例采用IPOM方法,有1例复发,复发率0.99%;97例采用Stoppa方法,有3例复发,复发率3.09%;17例采用肌前修补法,有3例复发,复发率17.6%.在21例复发疝病人中,16例采用了IPOM方法,无再复发病例;5例采用了Stoppa方法,有1例再复发,复发率20%.结论:IPOM方法和Stoppa方法的手术适应症宽、复发率低.IPOM方法对于复发的切口疝病人有更好的治疗效果.术者的经验和方法的正确性对修补的成功均有重要意义.     

Incisional hernioplasty with extraperitoneal onlay polyester mesh

Recurrent incisional hernia remains a major problem for the general surgeon. The high recurrence rate of incisional hernias after primary closure by tissue approximation led to the development of tension-free procedures using prosthetic materials. The goal of this study is to present the results of an extraperitoneal tension-free technique using a polyester mesh (Mersilene). A total of 43 patients with incisional hernias were surgically treated during a 9-year period in our department. Twenty-four patients (56%) had recurrent incisional hernias, 21 had primary repair by tissue approximation, and 3 had prolene mesh tension-free repair with wound infection. Patients' mean age was 68.2 years, and the mean postoperative follow-up was 54.4 months. Immediate postoperative complications were noticed in 9 patients (21%) subcutaneous seroma in 6 (14%) and wound infection in 3 (7%). Recurrence was noticed in 4 patients (9%) during the first 9 postoperative months. Late minor complications such as restriction of abdominal wall motility and chronic pain was noticed in 3 (7%) patients. In conclusion, the extraperitoneal onlay tension-free incisional hernia repair using polyester mesh is an easy and safe procedure with no major morbidity or recurrence rate.     

Open Onlay Mesh Repair for Major Abdominal Wall Hernias with Selective Use of Components Separation and Fibrin Sealant

Background The objective of the study was to reassess the efficacy of the open onlay technique for repair of major incisional hernias, utilizing the modern adjuncts of components separation and fibrin sealant to reduce the principal complications of seroma and recurrence. Major incisional hernias were defined as >10 cm transverse diameter. Methods A prospective audit was applied to 116 patients undergoing open onlay incisional hernia repair during a 2-year period at a single institution. Information was collected concerning operative details, postoperative complications, and recurrence. Clinical review at a median 15.2 months postoperatively was followed by a telephoned structured questionnaire to assess quality of life. All patients with pain or suspected recurrence were recalled for examination. Results Fascial closure required components separation in 21 (18.1%) patients when tension-free fascia reconstruction was not possible, and fibrin sealant was applied in 22 (18.9%) in whom extensive skin flaps were dissected beyond the semilunar line. Postoperatively, there were 11 (9.5%) seromas and 2 (1.7%) deep wound infections. At 15.2 months’ follow-up there were 4 (3.4%) recurrences. Conclusions Open onlay mesh repair for major incisional hernias is a versatile operation applicable to all quadrants of the abdominal wall and gives excellent results when used in association with components separation and fibrin sealant.     

Combined prosthetic incisional hernioplasty and panniculectomy—a 5-year single-centre experience

Background

Ventral incisional hernia patients develop limitation in physical activities as the hernia enlarges, leading to alteration in their lifestyle, quality of life, aesthetic deformities, and occasionally to complications. Cosmetic improvement of the abdomen, an important objective of hernia repair, can be achieved when hernia repair is combined with panniculectomy. The authors undertook this study to review their experience of the integration of hernia repair and panniculectomy to improve the understanding and treatment of this condition.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of the records of patients who underwent abdominal hernia repair with panniculectomy from 2005 to 2010 was undertaken. The records were reviewed for patient demographics, hernia etiology, risk factors for recurrence, previous surgeries, previous approach, type of repair, incision approach, complications, length of hospital stay, and duration of follow-up. Surgical management included mesh hernia repair and pannus excision.

Results

Of the total 45 patients, mean age was 42.37 years and mean follow-up was 24.4 months. Twelve patients had recurrent hernias. Most of the patients underwent retrorectus underlay mesh repair [39 (86.67 %)], while 6 (13.33 %) underwent onlay mesh technique. Six (13.33 %) patients developed minor skin necrosis, while one (2.22 %) had skin flap necrosis requiring debridement and skin grafting, three (6.67 %) hernias recurred, one (2.22 %) had seroma formation, and one (2.22 %) developed sacral pressure sore.

Conclusion

This technique provides both functional and aesthetic benefits and generally meets the needs of the patients. It is safe, with a low risk of postoperative complications. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.     

Erfahrung in der Narbenhernienchirurgie

INTRODUCTION: Incisional hernia surgery in Germany is changing from conventional techniques to mesh implantation. The relevance of different factors such as surgical technique, mesh material, and patient-related parameters concerning the outcome following mesh repair is still under debate. METHODS: In a comparative retrospective study of 432 incisional hernia operations on 348 patients we analyzed 11 autodermic hernioplasties, 241 Mayo procedures,and 180 mesh repairs over a 25-year time period.In addition to the quality of life following mesh implantation,the prognostic relevance of demographic, pre- and intraoperative parameters, surgical technique, mesh material, and the surgeon's experience were subjected to both univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 9.7+/-8.8 years, the rate of major complications following mesh repair was 9% in contrast to 3% after the Mayo procedure (p=0.091). The sublay technique revealed less complications compared to the onlay procedure (p=0.016). The total recurrence rate following the overlapping Mayo repair was 37% in contrast to 15% after mesh implantation (p=0.001), with a significant superiority of the sublay technique over the inlay technique (p=0.043). The rate of recurrences and complications after autodermic hernioplasty was 72% and 36%,respectively. After mesh repair, 86% of the patients were better satisfied with the results after Marlex mesh compared to GoreTex (p=0.016). Mesh size was the only significant prognostic factor concerning quality of life following mesh implantation. The complication rate was determined significantly by the patients' risk factors, size of hernia, surgical technique, and the surgeon's experience, whereas the rate of recurrences was significantly influenced by the parameters obesity (BMI >25), size of hernia,and surgical experience. The recurrence rate decreased significantly with the surgeon's experience: a minimum of 16 mesh repairs led to a recurrence rate of less than 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Only the mesh repair revealed acceptable recurrence rates with high patient comfort. The sublay technique is superior to onlay concerning the complication rate, whereas the autodermic hernioplasty and inlay techniques are obsolete. The material of choice is polypropylene. The most important prognostic factor following mesh repair is the surgeon's experience.     

巨大切口疝的开放式无张力修补术

目的:总结无张力技术修补巨大切口疝的临床经验及其围手术期处理要点.方法:对我院2002年5月至2007年5月收治的38例巨大切口疝临床资料进行回顾性分析,其中30例应用肌后修补法(sublay法)修补,8例采用腹腔内补片修补法(underlay法)修补,所用补片材料为聚丙烯(68.0%)或复合补片(32%).随访1～5年,统计病人的并发症和复发率.结果:80%病人有术前合并症,包括肥胖(45%)、糖尿病(16.4%)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(12.5%)和腹主动脉瘤(2.7%).无张力疝修补后2～3周病人均痊愈出院.随访结果,复发2例(5.3%),伤口感染3例(7.9%),血清肿5例(13.1%).结论:人工材料无张力修补术是治疗腹壁大切口疝的优良术式,手术创伤小、术后恢复快.对于疝环巨大或疝内容物多、突出时间长的特大切口疝病人应给予充分的术前准备.     

Operative Therapie der Narbenhernie

Secondary ventral hernia or incisional hernia occurs in at least 20?% of cases after laparotomy and most patients are symptomatic. The pathogenesis of incisional hernia is believed to be based on a defect in collagen synthesis indicating the necessity of covering the whole original incision with a non-resorbable, macroporous mesh. These meshes can be used on top of the fascia (onlay), in a retromuscular fashion (sublay) or intraperitoneally (IPOM). The IPOM technique is the preferred procedure during laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias. The clear advantage of the laparoscopic approach is the dramatically reduced rate of wound complications, especially infections. Major defects of the abdominal wall require plastic reconstruction with the component separation technique in both anterior and posterior approaches. The component separation technique must be combined with retromuscular mesh augmentation enabling a recurrence rate of less than 10 % and an acceptable morbidity to be achieved.     

Randomized clinical trial of suture repair, polypropylene mesh or autodermal hernioplasty for incisional hernia

BACKGROUND: Since conventional suture repair for incisional hernia is associated with high recurrence rates, alloplastic and autoplastic prosthetic techniques have been suggested. METHODS: In a randomized trial, 160 patients with simple or complex hernias underwent either suture repair, autodermal skin graft or onlay polypropylene mesh repair. Suture repair was not done in complex hernias. This report concerns a planned interim analysis. RESULTS: At mean follow-up of 16 months, there were 17 hernia recurrences that were distributed similarly between the surgical techniques. There were fewer infectious complications after suture repair (three of 33 patients) than after skin graft or mesh repair (seven of 39 and five of 28 for simple hernias; seven of 31 and ten of 29 respectively for complex hernias) (P not significant). The severity of infections after polypropylene mesh implantation prompted the trial committee to discontinue the study. No differences were noted in duration of stay in hospital and quality of life. However, pain was significantly more frequent after polypropylene mesh repair (pooled risk ratio 2.9 and 1.8 at 6 weeks and 1 year respectively). CONCLUSION: Suture repair was safe for small incisional hernias. Both autoplastic and alloplastic hernia repair yielded comparably low recurrence rates, but led to a high rate of wound infection.