Assessment of eosinophil granule proteins in various body fluids: is there a relation to clinical variables in childhood asthma?

BACKGROUND: The eosinophil plays a central role in the inflammatory process in bronchial asthma. Recent studies have indicated that the assessment of eosinophil-derived proteins in various body fluids could be used for monitoring disease activity of childhood asthma. Till now, no study exists which compared the levels of eosinophil-derived proteins in various body fluids such as serum, nasal lavage fluid (NALF) and urine. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether eosinophil granule proteins in different compartments were correlated and whether there is a relationship between disease activity, pulmonary function and bronchial hyperreactivity. METHODS: Twenty-eight children with atopic bronchial asthma were recruited. Serum, NALF and urine samples were obtained and assessed for eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and eosinophil protein X (EPX). The levels of eosinophil proteins were analysed for a relationship with lung function variables, bronchial hyperreactivity and disease activity. Eleven healthy control subjects were used as controls. RESULTS: Median ECP and EPX concentrations in serum (31.4 and 74.8 microg/L vs 15.8 and 24.3 microg/L, respectively), NALF (9.9 and 44. 9 microg/L vs 0 and 2.5 microg/L, respectively) and urine (49.4 vs 16.5 microg/mmol creatinine) were significantly raised in children with bronchial asthma compared with healthy control subjects. In addition, ECP and EPX levels in serum and urine samples were significantly higher in symptomatic patients compared with asymptomatic subjects with asthma. Although no relationship between eosinophil-derived proteins in serum, NALF or urine and the level of nonspecific bronchial hyperreactivity could be detected, the concentrations of EPX in serum and urine were correlated with variables of pulmonary function. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate increased eosinophil activity in serum, NALF and urine derived from children with bronchial asthma. Due to the relationship between levels of eosinophil proteins in serum/urine samples and lung function, as well as significant concentration differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic asthmatic children, the assessment of eosinophil proteins in serum or urine samples appear to be more appropriate in monitoring disease activity than measurement of ECP or EPX in NALF. Thus, the determination of serum ECP/EPX or urinary EPX may be preferentially used in monitoring eosinophilic inflammation in childhood asthma.     

Eosinophil cationic protein and eosinophil protein X in the nasal lavage of children during the first 4 weeks of life. SPACE Collaborative Study Team

Eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and eosinophil protein X (EPX) are well established as markers of eosinophil activation. We analyzed ECP and EPX concentrations in nasal lavage fluids (NALF) of 378 neonates during their first 4 weeks of life. Inclusion criteria were a positive history of parental allergy and a positive skin prick test or specific IgE (RAST class > or = 2) against at least one out of a panel of common aeroallergens in one or both parents. Twenty-four infants with no history of parental allergy were used as controls. A volume of 2 ml of 0.9% saline was instilled into each nostril and immediately recovered by a suction device. ECP and EPX were analyzed by radioimmunoassay. In 65 samples of three consecutive lavages, EPX was detected in nine samples (13.8%) in the control group, whereas it was detected in 197/360 samples (54.7%) in the study population. The corresponding figures for ECP were 17/65 (26.2%) in the control group and 173/365 (47.4%) in the study group. Both proteins showed a skewed distribution (median/5-95th percentiles for ECP: 0 microg/l [0-69.4] and EPX: 6.6 microg/l [0-73.2]). The differences between the control group and the study group were statistically significant, regardless of the allergic disease of the parents. In children of allergic parents, activation proteins of the eosinophil granulocyte are released on the nasal mucosal surface in about 50% of the studied population at the age of 4 weeks. This early onset of eosinophil activation in the nasal respiratory epithelium may reflect a genetic predisposition to allergy or early exposure to allergens.     

Major basic protein, but not eosinophil cationic protein or eosinophil protein X, is related to atopy in cystic fibrosis.

Increased eosinophil granule proteins have been described in serum and sputum samples of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). It has been assumed that eosinophil degranulation is enhanced in atopic subjects - as in asthmatics. Since in CF no differences in eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), eosinophil protein X (EPX), and eosinophil peroxidase between atopic and nonatopic subjects have been detected, we investigated whether major basic protein (MBP) is increased in serum and sputum samples derived from atopic (n = 14) compared with nonatopic CF subjects (n = 26). In CF patients, high mean serum (sputum) levels of ECP 29.7 microg/l (2.7 mg/l), EPX 53.7 microg/l (7.9 mg/l), and MBP 984.6 microg/l but low sputum MBP levels (57.4 microg/l) were measured. In addition, in serum and in sputum samples, a significant correlation between MBP and ECP (P<0.03 and P<0.0001, respectively) or EPX (P<0.05 and P<0.0004, respectively) was detected. By subdivision of the patients into allergic and nonallergic subjects, significant differences were found for serum MBP values only(mean 1382.2 microg/l vs. 770.5 microg/l; P<0.0001), but not for ECP or EPX serum levels or for eosinophil proteins in sputum. Although no differences between atopic and nonatopic CF patients in ECP and EPX were found, serum MBP levels were higher in patients sensitized to inhalant allergens than in nonsensitized subjects. These results indicate differential release of eosinophil granule proteins in peripheral blood from eosinophils, and they also indicate that MBP in serum likely is to be a better discriminator of atopy in CF.     

Urine eosinophil protein X (EPX) is an in vitro parameter of inflammation in atopic dermatitis of the adult age

BACKGROUND: Eosinophils are important effector cells in several atopic diseases. The levels of eosinophil granule-derived mediators (ECP, EPX) in serum and body fluids have been proven to be correlated with disease activity in atopic respiratory diseases and atopic dermatitis. The study aimed to demonstrate an interrelationship between urine EPX and disease activity in adult patients with atopic dermatitis. METHODS: We determined urine EPX concentration, serum ECP concentration, and peripheral blood eosinophil count in 40 adult patients with mild to severe atopic dermatitis and compared it with the disease activity as assessed with the SCORAD index. RESULTS: Urine EPX and serum ECP concentrations were significantly higher in patients with severe atopic dermatitis than in patients with mild or moderate disease (median values 123.5 vs 78.3 microg/mmol creatinine, P<0.0001; 25.4 vs 14.9 microg/l, P<0.0001, respectively). We found a significant correlation between urine EPX levels, serum ECP levels, and the SCORAD (r=0.36, P<0.0001 and 0.34, P<0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Urine EPX is a useful in vitro parameter of inflammation in atopic dermatitis of the adult age.     

Intracellular expression and serum levels of eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) and eosinophil cationic protein in asthmatic children

BACKGROUND: Eosinophils are involved in the chronic inflammatory response in asthma and their basic proteins are thought to play a major pathophysiological role in this process. While serum levels of basic proteins have been used to monitor the ongoing allergic disease, little is known about the intracellular expression of these proteins in clinical situations. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the intracellular expression of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) in asthmatic children and control subjects and relate it to serum levels of both proteins, lung function tests and immunoglobulin (Ig)E levels. METHODS: Serum ECP and EPO concentrations were determined by immunoassays in 13 asthmatic children (mean age: 9 +/- 1 years, mean FEV1: 92 +/- 10% predicted, geometric mean PC20 histamine 0.5 mg/mL) and 10 age-matched, healthy control subjects. A flow cytometric single cell assay was employed to detect intracellular ECP and EPO in peripheral blood eosinophils. RESULTS: While serum concentrations of both ECP (asthma: median 15.0 microg/L [range 3.6-57.7] vs control: 5.9 microg/L [2.7-9.1]; P = 0.02) and EPO (22.9 microg/L [5.2-82.5] vs 7. 2 microg/L [2.5-12.7]; P = 0.008) were significantly elevated in asthmatics, the intracellular expression of ECP and EPO (measured as mean fluorescence intensity) was decreased (EG1: 55.3 [17.7-120.8] vs 100.3 [46.5-264.4]; P = 0.01; EG2: 80.2 [24.1-135.3] vs 133.7 [32. 1-244.9]; P = 0.04 and EPO: 49.7 [23.1-155.8] vs 94.9 [28.8-115.2]; P = 0.03). In asthmatics there was a significant correlation of FEV1 with intracellular ECP and of bronchial hyperresponsiveness with serum EPO and ECP. Furthermore, total IgE levels were positively correlated with serum EPO only. CONCLUSION: We conclude that in asthmatics the intracellular content of ECP and EPO in peripheral eosinophils is reduced possibly due to degranulation. Epitope masking in activated eosinophils or a shift to early bone marrow-derived progenitors with less granule proteins are further possible explanations.     

Circadian variation of urinary eosinophil protein X in asthmatic and healthy children

BACKGROUND: It is suggested that urinary eosinophil protein X (EPX) is a noninvasive tool to monitor bronchial inflammation in asthmatic children. However, circadian variation of the number and activation of eosinophils might possibly influence urinary EPX excretion. OBJECTIVE: Measurements of urinary EPX (radioimmunoassay) were used to investigate circadian variation of eosinophilic activation and to monitor bronchial inflammation in children with asthma before and after treatment with corticosteroids. METHODS: Urinary EPX excretion (microg/mmol creatinine) was measured in the morning and afternoon in 22 stable asthmatics and in 16 nonatopic, nonasthmatic controls to investigate circadian variation. Additionally, EPX excretion in the afternoon was analysed in 21 children with chronic asthma before and after 6 weeks of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, and in seven children within 24 h of admission due to an asthma exacerbation and again 3 months after discharge. RESULTS: EPX excretion in the first morning urine sample of the day compared with the afternoon urine sample was significantly higher both in children with asthma (n = 22; mean +/- standard deviation: 179.7 +/- 97.3 vs 60.9 +/- 40.7 microg/mmol creatinine, P = 0.0001) and in nonatopic nonasthmatic controls (n = 16; 114.5 +/- 57.1 vs 53.4 +/- 29.0 microg/mmol creatinine, P = 0.0001). EPX excretion decreased significantly after 6 weeks of anti-inflammatory treatment in the group of children with chronic asthma (n = 21; 124.7 +/- 84.6 vs 87. 5 +/- 61.9 microg/mmol creatinine, P = 0.02) and in the group of children with an acute asthma exacerbation 3 months after discharge (n = 7; 233.2 +/- 174.5 vs 75.8 +/- 59.5 microg/mmol creatinine, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: This study suggests a circadian variation of EPX excretion in children with asthma and in nonatopic, nonasthmatic controls. Measurement of EPX excretion is helpful monitoring therapy in asthmatic children if circadian variation is considered.     

Eosinophil cationic protein(ECP) and eosinophil protein X (EXP) concentrations in serum and bronchial lavage fluid in asthma. effect of prednisolone treatment.

Background Eoswinophil granule proteins may contribute to hyperresponsiveness in asthma.
Objective To measure eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and eosinophil protein X (EPX) in sereum and bronchial lavage fluid from 20 asthmatics and 16 control subjects. To asses the effect on these eosinophil proteins of corticosteroid treatment of asthma. To determine ehether serum ECP and EPX measured weekly in a longitudina study for 10 weeks reflected changes in lung function.
Methods Eosinophil granule proteins were measured by radiommunoassy of bronchial wash (BW), bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) serum.
Results Eosinophils were elevated in BAL (P<0.01) , BW (P<0.01) and blood (P<0.01) from asthmatic compared with control subjects. Eosinophil cationic protein concentration was significantly elevated in BAL (P<0.05) and BW from asthmatics (P<0.01) and EPX was increased in BAL (P<0.05) and BW (P<0.01) . These changes were also reflected in elevated serum ECP (P<0.01) and EPX (P<0.01) concentrations is asthmatic subjects. There was no significant difference between sujects receiving prednisolone and the placebo group, but there was a fall in ECP in BW (P<0.05) and serum (P<0.01) and in EPX in BW (P<0.01) and serum (P<0.01) within the group receiving prednisolone. In the longitudinal study there was only significant difference between ECP values associated with highest and lowest peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) (P<0.05).
Conclusion These data confirm a role for cosinophil activation in the airway in asthma pathogenesis, and add some support to the hypothesis that corticosteroids may inhibit cosinophil activation in asthma.     

Evaluation of serum eosinophil cationic protein as a predictive marker for asthma exacerbation in patients with persistent disease

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic inflammation is a feature of asthma. However, serological markers to indicate eosinophil activation in this process are not fully defined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship of serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) to asthma worsening and a marker for treatment effectiveness, 26 adult patients with an asthma exacerbation were identified. METHODS: Identified asthma subjects were treated with oral corticosteroids (prednisone) for 14 days. The lung function variables, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and peak expiratory flow (PEF), were determined as percentage of predicted and the blood total eosinophil count and serum ECP levels were measured. Patients were re-evaluated after 14 days of corticosteroid treatment and then every 3 months thereafter during a 12-month period. RESULTS: Eighteen patients responded to prednisone treatment, whereas eight did not, assessed as improvement of their lung function parameters. Different serum ECP patterns could be seen in the responders compared with the non-responders. All 18 responders had considerably increased serum ECP at the time of exacerbation, whereas the non-responders had lower serum ECP levels. The serum ECP levels decreased to a greater extent in the responder patient group than in the non-responder patients following prednisone treatment. This difference in patterns was not seen with total blood eosinophil counts. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that serum ECP may be used to predict a response to corticosteroid therapy in adult patients with asthma.     

A kinetic study in adults with food hypersensitivity assessed as eosinophil activation in fecal samples

BACKGROUND : Immune-mediated food hypersensitivity affecting the gut is difficult to evaluate, and objective tools to diagnose local gastrointestinal (GI) inflammatory reactions are lacking. OBJECTIVES : To determine whether allergic manifestations in adults with a history of food-related GI symptoms could be assessed in feces during symptomatic and non-symptomatic periods, using the surrogate markers, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), eosinophil protein X (EPX) and myeloperoxidase (MPO). METHODS : Thirteen subjects with food hypersensitivity-related GI symptoms, confirmed by a positive double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC), were subjected to an open kinetic food challenge design for 6 weeks. Symptoms were recorded and scored during the 3-week study period and stool samples were obtained every day. The surrogate markers ECP, EPX and MPO were measured in the supernatants from feces samples. RESULTS : A significant increase in abdominal pain, distension and flatulence was observed during challenge, with a gradual decrease during elimination diet. Both between days and subjects, EPX levels were more frequently increased compared to ECP and MPO. Individuals with a history of a short duration of symptoms had significantly higher mean levels of EPX and MPO than those with a longer duration of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS : An overall increase in levels of eosinophil markers, in particular EPX, was observed in feces from patients with food-related GI symptoms. However, rather than being a tool to differentiate symptomatic from non-symptomatic periods, EPX might be used for detecting an ongoing clinical or subclinical chronic inflammation, that may have an impact on the patient's clinical course of GI symptoms.     

Serum eosinophil cationic protein, urinary eosinophil protein X and urinary N-methylhistamine during acute asthma in children]

Serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), urinary eosinophil protein X (EPX) and urinary N-methylhistamine were investigated in 24 asthmatic children during acute asthma to determine the sequential variation in the parameters. Serum ECP levels and urinary EPX levels were high during acute asthma, and decreased gradually with improvement of acute asthma, however, these levels of eosinophil drived proteins were significantly higher than those in non-atopic children. There was no significant variation of urinary NMH levels. Significant inverse correlation was found between lung function and urinary EPX level. The present study suggests that serum ECP and urinary EPX may be useful for monitoring airway inflammation during acute asthma, and activation of eosinophils may persist after improvement of acute asthma.     

Blood eosinophil number and activity in relation to lung function in patients with asthma and with eosinophilia.

Blood eosinophil count, serum concentrations of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), eosinophil protein X (EPX), myeloperoxidase (MPO), and peak expiratory flow (PEF) rate were studied in 23 patients with severe labile asthma characterized by eosinophilia at the start and end of a treatment period of 5 weeks. The mean blood eosinophil count was 808 x 10(6)/L at the start of the treatment period. Serum ECP and EPX were significantly raised compared with that of the references, whereas the mean serum MPO level was normal. The mean PEF was significantly and negatively correlated to both blood eosinophil count and serum ECP and EPX, but the predominant correlation was that between blood eosinophil count and PEF. At the end of the treatment period, PEF had increased and the blood eosinophil count and serum ECP and EPX were reduced when these values were compared with the values at the start of the treatment period. There was a significant and negative correlation of mean PEF to serum ECP but not to the blood eosinophil count. In individual subjects, the decreases in the blood eosinophil counts and serum EPX were significantly correlated to the individual increases of mean PEF. In conclusion, the present investigation indicates that in patients with asthma and pronounced eosinophilia, the lung function of the patients was principally related to the number of circulating eosinophils, whereas, when their eosinophilia was reduced to moderate levels, the patient's lung function was closer related to the activity of the eosinophils.     

Sensitivity of sputum eosinophil cationic protein level for monitoring asthmatic patients with normal peak expiratory flow]

Previous studies have shown that eosinophils and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels in the sputum of patients with asthma closely reflect inflammatory activity of the bronchial mucosa. We examined whether the ECP level or eosinophil count in induced sputum provides information useful in determining whether to taper the dose of medications or to terminate treatment especially with inhaled corticosteroids in patients with well controlled asthma. We studied 15 adults with asthma who consistently maintained a peak expiratory flow (PEF) value within 80% or more of their predicted value (green zone) for at least 4 weeks with no asthmatic symptoms. All patients underwent at least two hypretonic saline inhalation tests. Forty sputum samples were obtained for evaluation of cell count and ECP level. Before the tests, patients were requested to record asthmatic symptoms, medications received, and morning and evening PEF values in a diary for more than 3 months. The relations among clinical and laboratory variables, including symptoms scores, medication scores, asthma scores (= symptom scores + medication scores). PEF values, forced expiratory volume (FEV1.0) during the test, and sputum eosinophil count or sputum ECP, were analyzed. The sputum ECP level correlated significantly with the percentage of eosinophils in the sputum (rs = 0.783). There were also significant correlations between the sputum ECP level and the mean weekly symptom scores (rs = 0.500-0.510), medication scores (rs = 0.510-0.540), and asthma scores (rs = 0.509-0.548). However, there were no significant correlations among sputum ECP level, mean morning PEF or evening PEF, daily variation in PEF, and FEV1.0. We conclude that the sputum ECP level is a sensitive laboratory variable useful in monitoring the presence of eosinophilic inflammation in the bronchial mucosa of patients with bronchial asthma, especially those who have mild or no symptoms with normal PEF.     

Urinary leukotriene E(4), eosinophil protein X, and nasal eosinophil cationic protein are not associated with respiratory symptoms in 1-year-old children

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic airways inflammation forms the pathophysiologic basis for a proportion of children at risk of developing recurrent wheezing. Early preventive measures and/or anti-inflammatory treatment may be guided by the identification of such children. We aimed to study the relationship between respiratory symptoms and indirect markers of airway inflammation. METHODS: We measured eosinophil protein X (EPX) and leukotriene E(4) (LTE(4)) in urine, as well as eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in nasal lavages, in a random sample of 1-year-old children with a family history of atopy who participated in an international multicenter study on the prevention of allergy in Europe. For urine analyses, 10 children with upper respiratory illness and 19 healthy children without a family history of atopy were also enrolled. Endogenous urinary LTE(4) was separated by HPLC and determined by enzyme immunoassay with a specific antibody. The concentrations of nasal ECP and urinary EPX were determined by RIA analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and ten children (mean age: 1.05+/-0.1 years) were enrolled. Prolonged coughing during the first year of life was reported in 29 children, wheezy breathing in 17 children, and dry skin in 33 children. A doctor's diagnosis of wheezy bronchitis was given to 17 children. Sensitization to dust mites (specific IgE > or =1.43 ML/units) was detected in two children. Children with a doctor's diagnosis of atopic dermatitis within the first 12 months of life (n=6) had significantly higher urinary EPX than children without this (66.7 vs 30.1 microg/mmol creatinine, P=0.01). Urinary excretion of EPX and LTE4 showed a weak correlation (r=0.22, P=0.02). There were no significant differences in urinary excretion of EPX and LTE(4) or nasal ECP between children with and without respiratory symptoms (P>0.1). CONCLUSIONS: At the age of 1 year, urinary EPX is increased in children with atopic dermatitis. With regard to respiratory symptoms, urinary and nasal inflammatory parameters are not helpful in characterizing the phenotype of a single patient.     

Granulocyte proteins in serum in childhood asthma: relation to spirometry and therapy

Background Measurement of markers of eosinophil activation in asthmatics provides information indicative of ongoing inflammatory processes in the airways. Objectives This study was eonducted to determine the correlations between serum markers of allergie inflammation with spirometry parameters in asthmatic children in different treatment groups. Methods Blood eosinophils. serum levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP). eosinophil protein X (EPX), myeloperoxidase (MPO) and tryptase were measured simultaneously with serial measurements of FEV₁/FVC, FEF_25–75 and FEF in 60 children with acute asthma on admission and after 2, 14, 30 and 60 days. Group A received bronchodilators only (n= 20). group B received sodium cromoglycate (SCG) (n= 20) and group C received oral and/or inhaled corticosteroids (n= 20). Results Oral steroid treatment (2 mg /kg/day). given at the onset of the asthma attack, resulted in significant reduction in the ECP and EPX levels in all the children. However, these reduced ECP and EPX levels were not sustained in the children, even in those who continued on maintenance steroid treatment. Significant, but inconsistent, correlations between ECP, EPX with total eosinophil count, percentage eosinophils and spirometry parameters were observed at the different time-points. Tryptase levels were normal in all subjects. There were no significant correlations between myeloperoxidase levels and the spirometry parameters or eosinophil parameters. Serial monitoring of ECP and EPX levels was found to be of some use in predicting clinical outcome in certain steroid-dependent asthmatics (group C) but of no value in the mild asthmatics (group A). Conclusion While elevation of ECP, EPX and MPO in the serum of childhood asthmatics suggests ongoing inflammation and may inversely correlate with spirometry parameters in some patients, the relationship between these markers and airway function is not a simple one.     

Serum eosinophil granule proteins predict asthma risk in allergic rhinitis

Background: Allergic rhinitis is a common disease, in which some patients will deteriorate or develop asthma. It is important to characterize these patients, thereby offering the possibility for prevention. This study evaluated eosinophil parameters as potential indicators of deteriorating allergic airway disease. Methods: The subjects of the study included all patients who suffered seasonal allergic rhinitis and had participated in a study 6 years earlier, in which blood eosinophils, serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) serum eosinophil peroxidase (EPO), nasal lavage ECP and nasal lavage EPO levels were measured. Patients in the present study were interviewed on occurrence of rhinitis symptoms during the last season, rhinitis outside season, asthma‐like symptoms and asthma diagnosis, and were skin‐prick tested for common aeroallergens. Eosinophil parameters from the study 6 years earlier were then tested for the ability to predict occurrence of new allergies, worsening of rhinitis and occurrence of asthma. Results: Forty‐four patients participated in the study. In four patients seasonal rhinitis symptoms had deteriorated, 10 had experienced perennial rhinitis symptoms, 14 reported asthma‐like symptoms and seven had been diagnosed with asthma. Thirteen had developed additional sensitization. Patients developing asthma‐like symptoms compared with patients with no such symptoms had significantly higher serum ECP (16.7 μg/l vs 8.2 μg/l; P ≤ 0.01) and serum EPO (17.9 μg/l vs 8.8 μg/l; P ≤ 0.05). Results were similar, considering patients diagnosed with asthma. Blood eosinophils and nasal lavage parameters were not related to development of asthma and asthma‐like symptoms. No eosinophil parameter was related to deterioration of rhinitis or additional sensitization. Conclusion: Serum ECP and EPO in patients with seasonal rhinitis demonstrated a high predictive ability for later development of asthma.     

Urinary eosinophil protein X in children with atopic asthma: A useful marker of antiinflammatory treatment

BACKGROUND: Bronchial asthma is associated with elevated serum levels of eosinophil products, such as eosinophil protein X (EPX), but the occurrence in urine of this substance in patients with asthma has not previously been studied. OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to clarify whether increased amounts of eosinophil granulocyte proteins in urine and serum reflect ongoing asthmatic inflammation and whether decreasing values reflect successful treatment. METHODS: Twelve children with a median age of 12.5 years who had mild or moderate atopic asthma were studied for 3 months. At the time of inclusion in the study, treatment with inhaled budesonide was initiated. Nine children of the same age without atopic disease served as control subjects. Levels of EPX, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), and myeloperoxidase in serum and in urine (urinary EPX) were determined at inclusion and then after 3 months of treatment. Spirometry was performed on the same occasions. RESULTS: At the time of inclusion, urinary EPX and serum ECP were significantly higher in children with atopic asthma than in the control subjects (mean, 116.4 vs 43.0 μg/mmol creatinine [p = 0.004] and 37.0 vs 14.8 μg/L [p = 0.004]). In the asthma group urinary EPX, as well as serum ECP, decreased significantly after 3 months of treatment with budesonide (116.4 to 68.4 μg/mmol creatinine [p = 0.005] and 37.0 to 24.0 μg/L [p = 0.04]). At the same time, peak expiratory flow values increased significantly in the children with asthma (76.0% to 87.8% of predicted value [p = 0.005]) but not in the control subjects (87.0% to 90.1%). In the asthma group the levels of myeloperoxidase were similar to those in the control group, both at inclusion and after 3 months. CONCLUSION: Increased urinary EPX and serum ECP levels seem to reflect active atopic asthma, whereas decreased levels after antiinflammatory treatment probably reflect normalization of airway inflammation, and indirectly, improved lung function. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 1996;97:1179-87.)     

Twenty-four-hour time course of eosinophil granule proteins ECP and EPX during bronchial allergen challenges in serum of asthmatic children

To study in vivo monitoring variables for bronchial allergen challenges, we investigated the time course of the eosinophil granule proteins, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and eosinophil protein × (EPX) after allergen provocation in serum. Thirty-two asthmatic children sensitive to house-dust mites and six healthy young adult controls were challenged by bronchial allergen provocations with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and D. farinae. Blood samples were taken at regular intervals up to 24 h. Base-line concentrations of ECP ( P <0.004), EPX ( P <0.002), and eosinophils ( P <0.001) were found to be increased in asthmatic children, as compared with healthy controls. ECP and EPX concentrations showed a uniform pattern with two characteristic features: 1) a rapid increase for both mediators up to 30 min after provocation over base-line values ( P <0.0001 and P <0.001), followed by a rapid decrease nearly to base-line values in the next 30 min; and 2) a steady increase for ECP and EPX up to 10 h ( P <0.02 and P <0.01), and even higher levels at 24 h, after challenge ( P <0.002 and P <0.003). We conclude that although eosinophils are activated in asthmatic children after bronchial allergen challenge, ECP and EPX concentrations are not suitable monitoring variables. Base-line eosinophils seem to predict the occurrence of a late-phase asthmatic reaction after allergen provocation.     

Airway function correlates with circulating eosinophil, but not mast cell, markers of inflammation in childhood asthma

Background Lung function tests, including forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁), forced expiratory flow at 25–75% of vital capacity (FEF_25–75%) and provocation concentrations of histamine which reduce FEV] by 20% (PC₂₀), are used as indicators of airway form and function in bronchial asthma. Recently, markers of eosinophil activation in bronchial lavage and serum have been suggested as a measure of eosinophil mediated inflammation in the airways. These include eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), eosinophil protein X (EPX) (also known as eosinophil derived neuro-toxin) and eosinophil peroxidase (EPO). Similarly, serum tryptase has been used as a marker of mast cell activation in systemic anaphylaxis. Objectives We measured both sets of indices in a group of children with moderately severe asthma to assess the contribution of eosinophil and mast cell mediated events to airflow limitation and bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Methods Forty-eight children aged 5–10 years had spirometric assessments, histamine challenges and blood sampling on the same occasion. After analysis of sera, the indices were compared. Results The eosinophil markers ECP and EPX correlated very well with each other. They showed a moderate negative correlation with PC₂₀ for histamine. EPX was also found to negatively correlate with FEV, and FEF_25–75%. Serum tryptase levels showed no such correlates with airway function. Conclusion These results suggest that serum markers of eosinophil activation correlate with airway function in childhood asthma, and may be of value in assessing the severity of the disease. It further supports the notion that childhood asthma has a similar immunopathology to that occurring in adults, with predominance of eosinophil mediated inflammation.     

支气管哮喘患者血清嗜酸细胞阳离子蛋白的变化

探讨检测血清嗜酸细胞阳离子蛋白在支气管哮喘的诊断１病情监测及疗效判断中的价值。方法采用荧光酶免疫法测定了发作期和缓解哮喘患者各２０例,慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者１６例和正常人２０例的血清ＥＣＰ,同时进行了肺功能测定,并对发作期哮喘患者在给予吸入皮质激素治疗３ｍｏ后复测其ＥＣＰ及肺。     

Serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) as a marker of disease activity and treatment efficacy in seasonal asthma

This study was carried out to determine whether serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) represents a sensitive marker for disease activity in atopic asthmatic patients during the pollen season. The study, in double-blind fashion, was performed between February and June 1994. Two groups of 10 seasonal asthmatic patients randomly received two different treatments. The first group was treated with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 500 μg bid; the second received a matched placebo (P). At the beginning and every month, blood samples for determination of ECP and eosinophil count were collected and lung function (FEV₁) and methacholine responsiveness (PD₂₀) were performed. Subjects recorded daily symptoms of asthma, salbutamol consumption, and peak expiratory flow (PEF) values. In the P group, all indices, except FEV₁, showed significant changes during the pollen season ( P < 0.001). In the BDP group, significant changes were detected for symptom score ( P < 0.01), salbutamol consumption ( P < 0.01), and eosinophil number ( P < 0.05). Between the two groups, significant differences for symptom score ( P < 0.001), salbutamol consumption ( P < 0.001), ECP levels ( P < 0.05), eosinophil count ( P < 0.02), PD₂₀ methacholine ( P < 0.02), and PEF values ( P < 0.01) were detected. Changes in serum ECP significantly correlated with changes in other parameters ( P < 0.001), except FEV₁. Our results provide evidence that serum ECP is a sensitive marker for monitoring of the disease activity in seasonal asthma. Furthermore, it may offer a useful tool for estimating treatment efficacy.