普通器械经脐单孔与传统三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的对比分析

目的 探讨普通器械经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可行性及应用前景.方法 回顾分析2010年10月～2011年10月在湘西自治州人民医院肝胆科施行的48例腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的临床资料,其中,27例行传统三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC),21例行普通器械经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(TUSP LC),对比其术中出血量、术后排气时间、术后并发症、止痛药使用人数、住院费用及住院时间等.结果 在术中出血量、术后排气时间、住院时间和住院费用等方面,TUSPLC优于LC组,差异有显著性(P＜0.05);而手术时间LC组优于TUS-PLC组,差异有显著性(P＜0.05).结论 经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后几乎可完全实现腹壁无瘢痕化,但普通器械经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的术中操作难度较传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术高,手术时间长,手术适应证较严格.随着手术器械的完善和手术者经验的积累及其操作技术的不断提高,经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的优越性将越来越明显,值得在基层医院推广及应用.     

经脐免夹单孔腹腔镜胆囊阑尾联合切除15例操作体会

目的 探讨使用曲线型腹腔镜器械下免夹经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊阑尾联合切除术的可行性及操作体会.方法 回顾性分析该院2010年7月～2010年12月15例经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊阑尾联合切除患者的临床资料.结果 本组15例均通过曲线型腹腔镜器械及推结器经脐行单孔免夹腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)+腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)取得成功,均未放置引流.手术时间60～130 min,平均76.4 min;出血10～100 mL,平均34.8mL.无漏胆、肠瘘、出血、脐疝、切口感染等并发症发生,住院4～6 d,术后随访2用～2个月,平均1.3个月,几乎无腹壁疤痕.结论 经脐免夹单孔LC+LA安全、可行,微创效果更加,使用曲线形器械及推结器降低了单孔腹腔镜操作难度,节省了住院费用,具有广阔的应用前景和良好的社会和经济效益.     

经脐单孔单支点腹腔镜胆囊切除术

目的 探讨经脐单孔单支点腹腔镜手术的可行性.方法 总结分析2009年10月～2010年12月滨州医学院即墨医院肝胆外科和延世大学医学院胰胆中心完成的36例利用普通器械经脐单孔单支点腹腔镜胆囊切除术的手术方法及临床效果.结果 36例手术均获成功,无中转开腹或传统腹腔镜方法,无胆漏、切口感染等并发症.手术时间为25～90 min,平均45 min,术后平均住院时间2.5d.结论 经脐单孔单支点腹腔镜胆囊切除术是安全可行的,术后腹壁瘢痕不明显,美容效果满意.但操作较常规腹腔镜手术难度大.     

经脐单孔腹腔镜逆行胆囊切除78例分析

目的 探讨单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可行性及效果.方法 回顾性分析2009年5月～ 2010年7月完成的78例使用普通器械经脐单孔腹腔镜逆行胆囊切除术患者的临床资料.结果 78例患者均顺利完成手术,无1例并发症发生,无中转开腹或传统腹腔镜手术,手术时间25 ～ 95m in,术后平均住院数为2.7 d.结论 常规器械经脐单孔腹腔镜逆行胆囊切除操作相对困难,但其美容效果明显,有经验的腹腔镜外科医师在有技术条件的腔镜中心可选择合适的病例开展.     

经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术15例报告

目的研究经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床可行性及应用价值。方法对2011年8月至2012年12月在湘雅萍矿合作医院普外科实施经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的15例胆囊疾病患者临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果15例患者手术均取得成功,无中转常规腹腔镜手术或开腹手术,手术过程顺利,术中均未放置腹腔引流管。手术时间为50～110min,平均61.2min;术中出血15-145mL,平均37.5mL。术后住院时间2～3d,均痊愈出院。术后随访3-6个月,无胆管损伤、大出血、切口感染、脐疝及胆漏等并发症发生,切口愈合良好,腹壁瘢痕隐蔽不易察觉。结论经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术安全、可行,具创伤小、恢复快、美容效果佳等优点,有技术条件的医院可以在慎重选择病例的基础上开展。     

经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除56例体会

目的:探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床应用.方法:回顾性分析2010年2-5月间56例经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的临床资料.结果:56例手术均获成功.手术时间30 ～ 50 min,平均40 min;出血10 ～ 100 mL,平均20 mL.无并发症发生.术后随访2周～ 3个月,腹壁瘢痕不明显.结论:经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术是安全有效的,手术创伤更小,美容效果更佳.     

经脐单孔免夹腹腔镜胆囊切除术

目的 探讨用普通腹腔镜器械及自制的简单器械普及经脐单孔免夹腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可行性.方法 67例胆囊疾病患者行经脐单孔免夹腹腔镜胆囊切除术,通过建立脐部长约15 mm的单一切口,放置腹腔镜杆套筒及操作器械套筒,及辅助右肋缘下、剑突下细针穿入腹腔推拉提牵胆囊,带线结扎胆囊管免夹,超声刀或细电凝钩分离胆囊三角区,超声刀完成胆囊切除,从脐部切口提出胆囊.结果 67例手术单孔免夹腹腔镜胆囊切除术成功62例,5例中转二孔法免夹腹腔镜胆囊切除术.手术时间40～120min,平均77.5min;腹腔内出血0～0.5mL,全部病人未放置腹腔引流管,3～5 d出院,无并发症发生.结论 用普通腹腔镜器械行经脐单孔免夹腹腔镜胆囊切除术是可行性,能够完成较复杂难做的腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)术.但操作难度及习惯不同于传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术,有其特点需要学习,学习曲线不长,具有推广价值.     

经脐单孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术(附32例)

目的 探索单孔法在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用.方法 分析已完成的32例经脐单孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的临床资料.结果 本组32例,均成功完成单孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术,无中转开腹,均未放置引流管,平均手术时间是58.6min,平均出血量5 mL.术后恢复好,无黄疸等并发症.结论 经脐实施单孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术是完全可行的.     

经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术102例围术期护理

目的:探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的术前、术后护理方法。方法:回顾性分析总结2009年7月～2010年8月102例行单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的护理资料。结果:本组均未出现并发症,平均5 d出院。结论:经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术大大降低了与切口相关的并发症发生率,是一种安全可行的手术,具有微创、恢复快、住院时间短和美容效果的优势,通过术前、术后的精心护理,减少了并发症的发生,保证了患者术后尽快恢复。     

经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术31例体会

目的:探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性和可行性。方法:回顾分析2010年5月~2011年5月上饶肿瘤医院31例经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床资料。结果:28例成功行经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术,平均时间43min;3例因暴露困难中转4孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术;1例术后3d出现胆囊窝积液,行B超引导下腹腔穿刺引流术治愈。术后随访2周~1年,无手术相关并发症,脐部切口隐藏脐凹,无可视瘢痕。结论:术前术中严格掌握适应证,由经验丰富的腹腔镜医师开展,经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术具有微创、美观等优点,安全可行,疗效确切。     

Single‐port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A comparative study in 106 initial cases

Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been the standard of care for gallbladder diseases since the late 1980s. Many surgeons have rapidly adopted single‐port laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder pathologies. The aim of the present study was to analyze the clinical outcome in initial single‐port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: Data from 106 consecutive single‐port laparoscopic cholecystectomies between May 2008 and April 2009 were analyzed retrospectively. We divided the patients into two groups – an early group (group I, n=56) and a late group (group II, n=50) – to compare clinical outcomes. During each procedure, only one longitudinal transumbilical incision, 1.5 to 2.0 cm in length, was made to access the abdominal cavity. A multichannel port system was assembled with existing devices. Standard laparoscopic instruments were used to perform each cholecystectomy. Results: Patient demographics did not differ between the two groups. Of the eight cases that were converted to conventional laparoscopic surgery, seven were part of group I (P=0.063). Mean operation time for single‐port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was significantly shorter in group II (58.2 versus 71.6 min, P=0.004). There were two operative complications in group I, which were successfully managed with laparoscopic surgery. There was no statistical difference in occurrence of operative complication and hospital stay between the two groups. Conclusion: Single‐port laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed for various gallbladder lesions in selected cases, and the operation time improved with accumulation of cases.     

Transumblical single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a simple technique: Initial experience of 33 cases

Abstract

Transumbilical single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a novel laparoscopic surgical technique for cholecystectomy utilizing only a transumbilical incision, which eliminates any visible abdominal scars and improves cosmesis. As the true single port laparoscopic technique, we presented an easy and feasible method for transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A total of 33 patients were presented for transumbilical single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A 1.5 cm incision was made at the umbilicus. We used one sterile glove and designed a simple method for this procedure. All the operations were completed successfully. The operative time of the first case was 189 min, the average time of the following two cases was 90 min, and the mean of the latest ten cases was 50 min. Operative blood loss was <30 ml for all patients. No drainage tube was placed and no postoperative complications such as bleeding or biliary leakage occurred after three to six months of follow-up. All the patients were discharged 24h after the operation. There were no visible scars on the abdominal wall at the second weekend. Transumbilical single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy by our designed methods was technically simple, feasible and safe. Furthermore, development of newer instruments, accumulation of experience and enhancement of operative technique may facilitate this new operative approach.     

Single-incision transabdominal preperitoneal and totally extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia: early experience from a single center in Asia

Introduction: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is currently one of the most commonly performed minimally invasive surgical procedures. In recent years, single‐incision operations have been developed to further reduce the invasiveness of the surgery. Herein, we report our early experience with single‐incision laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in Asia, with both the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approaches. Methods: This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on a cohort of consecutive patients with inguinal hernia who underwent single‐incision laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in a minimal access surgical center in Hong Kong between January 2010 and January 2011. Results: Our cohort consists of 15 patients who underwent single‐incision laparoscopic inguinal hernia; 13 were unilateral and two were bilateral hernias. The mean age was 59.8 years old (range, 28–74 years). The overall mean operative time was 59.53 min (range, 25–120 min). For unilateral hernia repair, the mean operative time was 56 min (range, 25–75 min) and 48.5 min (range, 41–55 min) for TAPP and TEP, respectively. In all cases single‐incision laparoscopic hernia repair was successfully performed, no additional trocars were required, and there were no conversions to conventional laparoscopic or open inguinal hernia repair. All patients were discharged on the same day as the procedure. Conclusion: Single‐incision laparoscopic inguinal hernia is feasible in both TEP and TAPP approaches. The procedure should be performed by laparoscopic surgeons with a high level of experience in single‐incision surgery. Further randomized trials should be performed to evaluate the full potential and clinical application of single‐incision TAPP and TEP.     

Single‐port endo‐laparoscopic surgery in combined abdominal procedures

Single‐port endo‐laparoscopic surgery has gained support in the surgical community because it is perceived to offer a better postoperative outcome as it requires only a single incision. We write this prospective observational study to ascertain the feasibility and safety of this technique in patients otherwise requiring two operations. Five patients who underwent double procedures with a single‐port device were reviewed: Case 1, a transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair and gastric wedge resection; Case 2, cholecystectomy and diaphragmatic hernia repair; Case 3, oophorectomy and incisional hernia repair; Case 4, anterior resection of the rectum and hepatic segmentectomy; and Case 5, left adrenalectomy and cholecystectomy. Patient demographics, type of port used, operative time, complications and incision length were collected. Mean operative time for the cases ranged from 100 to 315 min. Incision length for the single‐port device was 2 cm. In Case 2, an additional 5‐mm port was used and an intraoperative complication involving a laceration of the liver occurred during the suturing of the gallbladder fundus. An additional 8‐cm lower abdominal incision (Pfannenstiel) was required in Case 4 to complete the colonic anastomosis and for specimen retrieval. Single‐port endo‐laparoscopic surgery is a feasible and safe technique for approaching double procedures. It drastically reduces the number of scars that a double procedure creates, and if difficulty arises, another port can always be added to ease the operation. It can also potentially reduce the number of admissions and anesthesia that a patient undergoes.     

经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊炎的临床观察

目的 探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊炎的疗效.方法 对本院2003年3月至2010年9月收治的胆囊炎患者204例,均分为实验组和对照组,实验组采用经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术进行治疗,对照组采用常规腹腔镜手术治疗,对两组患者治疗效果(胆管和肠管损伤、手术时间、麻醉时间、术后住院时间和再手术率)和并发症等相关因素进行统计学分析.结果 实验组患者在肠胆管损伤、出血量、抗生素应用时间、术后排气时间、进食时间和住院时间方面明显优于对照组(P<0.05).结论 对胆囊炎患者采用经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术是安全可靠的,但在手术中要正确处理患者胆囊三角的结构,在术中对患者进行胆管造影,并对不适宜经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术手术的患者进行开腹手术以降低患者出现并发症的机会.     

Reduced‐port laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: Feasibility based on our early experience

We report our experience of a reduced‐port laparoscopic surgery as an advanced laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Twelve selected patients with clinical T1–2 and N0 rectal cancer (clinical stage I) underwent low anterior resection of the rectum. The procedures were performed with one port plus a multiple‐instrument access port with three channels. The multiple‐instrument access port was placed at the umbilicus or the site of diverting stoma, and another port was placed in the right abdomen or in the opposite abdomen of ostomy. The median operative time and intraoperative bleeding were 280 min and 15 mL, respectively. The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 20. No major perioperative morbidities occurred in this series. The median postoperative hospital stay was 10 days. Low anterior resection performed by reduced‐port laparoscopic surgery is feasible as multiport laparoscopic surgery, and it is a reliable surgical option in selected patients with rectal cancer.     

MODIFIED LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

Ｔｈｅｄｅｖｅｌｏｐｍｅｎｔｏｆｌａｐａｒｏｓｃｏｐｉｃｃｈｏｌｅｃｙｓｔｅｃ ｔｏｍｙ ,ｍｉｌｅｓｔｏｎｅｏｆｍｉｎｉｍａｌｌｙｉｎｖａｓｉｖｅｓｕｒｇｅｒｙ ,ｉｓｔｈｅｍｏｓｔｉｍｐｏｒｔａｎｔｐｒｏｇｒｅｓｓｉｎ ｇｅｎｅｒａｌｓｕｒｇｅｒｙｆｏｒｔｈｅｌａｓｔｄｅｃａｄｅ[1] .Ｔｈｅｓｔａｎｄａｒｄｌａｐａｒｏｓｃｏｐｉｃｃｈｏｌｅｃｙｓｔｅｃ ｔｏｍｙｉｓｕｓｕａｌｌｙ ｐｅｒｆｏｒｍｅｄｗｉｔｈｔｗｏ 10 -ｍｍｓｔａｂｗｏｕｎｄｓｏｎｔｈｅｍｉｄｌｉｎｅａｎｄｔｗｏ 5-ｍｍ ｐｏｒｔｓｉｎｔ…     

开放手术与腹腔镜下手术治疗新生儿嵌顿性腹股沟斜疝的临床疗效比较

目的比较开放与腹腔镜下腹股沟斜疝疝囊高位结扎术治疗新生儿嵌顿性腹股沟斜疝的临床疗效。方法 2014年3月-2018年9月该院共收治28例腹股沟斜疝嵌顿新生儿,其中13例行开放手术(开放组),15例行腹腔镜手术(腹腔镜组)。对两组患儿的手术时间、切口长度、术中出血量、术后住院时间、总住院费用及术后并发症进行对比分析。结果腹腔镜组术中发现对侧隐匿性疝6例,3例行对侧鞘状突高位结扎术,腹腔镜组手术时间(16.00±4.68)min,开放组(34.54±5.30)min,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(t=15.14,P 0.05);腹腔镜组切口长度、术中出血量、术后住院时间、总住院费用优于开放组,差异均有统计学意义(P 0.05)。在手术并发症方面,开放组出现1例伤口感染(7.69%),5例阴囊红肿(38.46%),3例阴囊血肿(23.08%),1例隐睾(7.69%)。腹腔镜组出现1例阴囊红肿(6.67%),两组并发症总发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。随访2～56个月,两组均无复发及异时疝发生。结论腹腔镜手术治疗新生儿腹股沟斜疝嵌顿,操作简便、疗效确切,与开放性手术相比,具有创伤小、手术时间短、切口美观、术后阴囊肿胀发生率低、住院时间短和总住院费用低等优点,术后恢复快,是安全、有效、可行的方法,值得临床推广应用。随着儿童的生长发育,鞘状突开口比较小或者鞘状突有腹膜遮挡的隐匿性疝有自愈的可能,这部分患者可以考虑观察。     

经脐单孔腹腔镜治疗精索静脉曲张的疗效观察

【目的】探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜治疗精索静脉曲张的可行性和安全性。【方法】选择2013年1~12月本院收治的16例精索静脉曲张的患者,应用经脐单孔腹腔镜技术行精索静脉高位结扎术。观察患者手术时间、住院时间、术后并发症、复发等临床指标。【结果】16例均顺利完成手术,单侧手术时间平均25 min,平均住院时间为3.5 d。术后随访显示患者症状明显改善,无阴囊水肿、睾丸萎缩等并发症发生,未见复发患者。【结论】经脐单孔腹腔镜精索静脉高位结扎术具有良好的临床可行性和安全性,值得临床推广使用。     

Modified transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Double-incision,triple-port access

Abstract

Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been increasingly performed in recent years, using special access devices and instruments through one incision in the umbilicus. We have modified the technique by using a two-incision triple-port access approach and conventional laparoscopic instruments. A total of 52 patients accepted the modified transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and all the procedures were completed successfully. The operative time was 150 minutes for the first case, 100 minutes and 90 minutes for the second and third cases, and an average of 50 ± 14 minutes for the following 49 cases. All patients were discharged on post-operative day 3. No complications were observed during a follow-up of at least three months. The umbilical incisions were nearly invisible, and all patients were satisfied with the abdominal cosmetic results.In conclusion, transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a double-incision triple-port access approach and conventional laparoscopic instruments as described in this study is safe and feasible, and it reduces the conflict of instruments without using special devices.