Primary gastrointestinal sarcomas: Analysis of prognostic variables

Background: Primary gastrointestinal sarcomas are uncommon, and the clinicopathological determinants of survival remain unclear. In order to correlate clinical presentation, pathological assessment, and treatment with outcome, we have analyzed our institution's recent experience with these tumors. Methods: Records of adult patients admitted to our institution between July 1982 and December 1991 were reviewed. Results: During this period, 38 adult patients (>16 years of age) were admitted to our institution with a primary gastrointestinal sarcoma. They accounted for 2% of all adult sarcoma admissions during that period. The study population was composed of 26 men and 12 women. Ages ranged from 29 to 82 years (mean 59). Disease was localized to the primary site in 30 patients (81%). The stomach was the most frequent site of disease (20 cases). The small bowel was affected in nine cases (five duodenum, four jejunum) and the large bowel in nine cases (two colon, seven rectum). Ninety-two percent of patients were symptomatic at presentation. A complete resection was performed in 27 cases, incomplete resection in seven cases, and biopsy only in the remaining three patients. Nine patients received doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. Leiomyosarcoma (n=35) was the predominant histological diagnosis. Twenty-six tumors were classified as high grade (68%) and 12 as low grade (32%). Overall actuarial 5-year survival was 28% (median follow-up 26 months). Weight loss (p=0.02) and pain at presentation (p=0.05) were adverse prognostic factors. Histological grade (p=0.0002), completeness/extent of surgical resection (p=0.005), or a small bowel primary site were significant determinants of overall survival. The resection of contiguous organs did not affect survival if the primary tumor was completely excised (p=0.422). Age, race, sex, presentation (prior surgery), tumor size, or adjuvant therapy were not significant prognostic factors. Recurrence was noted in 44% after complete resection, and mean time to recurrence was 9 months (median 7, range <1–37). Hepatic metastases (42%) and local recurrence (42%) were the predominant sites of initial failure. For patients with a complete resection, grade was the major prognostic determinant (5-year survival: high grade/complete resection 18% vs. low grade/complete resection 72%, p=0.002). Conclusion: The prognosis of gastrointestinal sarcomas is poor. Complete surgical excision is the optimal therapy. However, our results suggest that surgery alone is inadequate for high-grade tumors. We believe that these patients should be considered candidates for investigational adjuvant therapies.Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of The Society of Surgical Oncology, Los Angeles, California, March 18–21, 1993.     

Gastrointestinal sarcomas. Analysis of prognostic factors.

Clinical and pathologic data from 51 patients with primary sarcomas of the gastrointestinal tract treated from 1951 through 1984 were reviewed to determine clinical presentation, histologic features, treatment, and prognostic factors. The most common signs and symptoms were abdominal pain (62%), gastrointestinal bleeding (40%), and/or abdominal mass (38%). The primary site was stomach in 50%, small bowel in 30%, colorectum in 15%, and esophagus in 5%. Virtually all the sarcomas were leiomyosarcomas. Distribution was uniform among the three histologic grades; although 88% of Grade 1 tumors could be completely excised, only 35% of Grade 3 tumors could be completely resected. The 5-year survival rate was 75% for Grade 1 tumors, 16% for Grade 2 tumors, and 28% for Grade 3 tumors (p = 0.0013, Grade 1 vs. 2 and 3). Thirty of the 51 patients (59%) had curative resection with an operative morbidity rate of 24% and an operative mortality rate of 12%; at 5 years the disease-free survival rate was 58% and the overall survival rate was 63% (48% at 10 years). Eleven patients (42%) had recurrent disease develop at a median interval of 2 years after complete tumor excision. Twenty-one patients (41%) had partial excision or biopsy only of their tumors with an operative morbidity rate of 28%, operative mortality rate of 8%, and median survival of only 9 months. Overall, patients whose tumors were confined to the site of origin had a 58% 5-year survival rate compared with 20% for those whose tumors had invaded adjacent organs (p less than 0.05). If the tumor was less than 10 cm in size, the 5-year survival rate was 78%, significantly better than the 38% for tumors greater than 10 cm (p = 0.03). These data suggest that histologic grade, local invasiveness, size, and extent of resection are the most important prognostic factors for patients with primary gastrointestinal sarcomas. Patients who have resection of all gross tumor, especially if it is well differentiated and localized, have a good prognosis.     

Primary gastrointestinal sarcomas: analysis of prognostic factors and results of surgical management

BACKGROUND: This study was done to review the clinical presentation, surgical management, and prognostic factors for primary gastrointestinal sarcomas. METHODS: We reviewed medical records of 55 patients who were treated for primary gastrointestinal sarcomas from 1981 through 1996. Mean follow-up time was 32 months. RESULTS: Clinical findings included gastrointestinal bleeding (51%), palpable mass (36%), and abdominal pain (33%). The stomach was the most common site of disease (53%), followed by the small intestine (33%). Tumors were high grade in 76% of patients and low-grade in 24% of patients. Complete resection of all gross disease was accomplished in 35 patients (64%), incomplete resection in 17 patients (31%), and biopsy only in 3 patients (5%). Adjacent organ resection was required in 19 patients (35%). Overall actuarial survival was 22% (median survival, 32 months). Unfavorable prognostic factors were incomplete resection, high-grade histologic features, and tumor size of 5 cm or more (P<.05). En bloc resection of contiguous organs did not adversely effect survival. In patients with complete resections, tumor grade was the most important prognostic factor (median survival, 55 months vs 19 months for low-grade vs high-grade tumors; P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive surgical resection, including en bloc resection of locally advanced tumors, appears warranted. Despite complete resections, patients with high-grade tumors remain at risk for recurrence.     

Selection criteria for hepatic resection in patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma larger than 10 cm in diameter

BACKGROUND: The role of hepatic resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) larger than 10 cm remains unclear. STUDY DESIGN: Perioperative and longterm outcomes of 120 patients with HCC larger than 10 cm who underwent resection (group A) were compared with 368 patients with smaller HCC (group B). The prognostic factors in group A were analyzed. RESULTS: A higher proportion of patients underwent major hepatic resection in group A than in group B (90% versus 57.6%, p = 0.001), but the hospital mortality was similar (5.0% versus 4.6%, p = 0.874). Group A had worse longterm overall survival (median 18.8 months versus 62.8 months, p < 0.001) and disease-free survival (median 5.5 months versus 25.4 months, p < 0.001) than group B. Macroscopic residual tumor, macroscopic venous invasion, and multiple tumors were identified as independent prognostic factors in group A. The median survival of patients with residual tumor and those with curative resection was 7.7 months and 20.8 months, respectively. The median survival of patients with curative resection of solitary HCC larger than 10cm without macroscopic venous invasion was 38.0 months; that of patients with both macroscopic venous invasion and multiple tumors was only 10.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic resection is a safe and effective treatment for HCC larger than 10cm when liver function reserve is satisfactory and when curative resection can be expected. Patients with solitary HCC larger than 10cm without macroscopic venous invasion can enjoy longterm survival after surgery, and we propose hepatic resection as a standard treatment for this group of patients.     

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: resectability, recurrence pattern, and outcomes

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC) is a rare primary hepatic tumor of bile duct origin for which resection is the most effective treatment. But resectability, outcomes after resection, and recurrence patterns have not been well described. Patients with IHC were identified from a prospective database. Demographic data, tumor characteristics, and outcomes were analyzed. From March 1992 to September 2000, 53 patients with hepatic tumors underwent exploration and were found to have pure IHC on pathologic analysis. Patients with mixed hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma tumors were excluded. At exploration, 20 patients were unresectable for an overall resectability rate of 62% (33 of 53). Median survival for patients submitted to resection was 37.4 months versus 11.6 months for patients undergoing biopsy only (p = 0.006; median followup for surviving patients, 15.6 months). Actuarial 3-year survival was 55% versus 21%, respectively. Factors predictive of poor survival after resection included vascular invasion (p = 0.0007), histologically positive margin (p = 0.009), or multiple tumors (p = 0.003). After resection, 20 of 33 patients (61%) recurred at a median of 12.4 months. Sites of recurrence included the liver (14), retroperitoneal or hilar nodes (4), lung (4), and bone (2). The median disease-free survival was 19.4 months, with a 3-year disease-free survival rate of 22%. Factors predictive of recurrence were multiple tumors (p = 0.0002), tumor size (p = 0.001), and vascular invasion (p = 0.01). About two-thirds of patients who appeared resectable on preoperative imaging were amenable to curative resection at the time of operation. Although complete resection improved survival, recurrence was common. The majority of recurrences were local or regional, which may help guide future adjuvant therapy strategies.     

Indicators of prognosis after hepatic resection for colorectal secondaries.

From 1960 to 1988, 266 patients underwent resection of colorectal secondaries to the liver with curative intent. All patients were followed until April 1, 1990, or death, with a median follow-up time of 52 months. Nine patients with minimal macroscopic residual disease and 38 patients with all gross tumor removed but positive margins showed a poor prognosis with a median survival time of 13.3 months, the longest being 42 months. Of the 219 patients having potentially curative resection, 12 patients died postoperatively (5.5%). Actuarial 5, 10 and 20-year survival for the remaining 207 patients was 39%, 28%, and 18%, respectively. At April 1, 1990, 77 patients were alive with no evidence of disease for up to 24 years, and 12 patients had died without recurrence. The following factors were associated with less favorable crude survival: presence and extent of mesenteric lymph node involvement (p = 0.0003), grade III/IV primary tumor (p = 0.035), synchronous diagnosis of metastases (p = 0.017), satellite metastases (p = 0.0003), limited resection margins (p = 0.019), and nonanatomic procedures (p = 0.013). With respect to disease-free survival, grading of the primary (p = 0.055) and the extent of clear margins (p = 0.019) failed to achieve statistical significance. Two other criteria are commonly recommended as absolute contraindications to hepatic resection: extrahepatic disease and the presence of four or more independent metastases. A radical excision of all detectable disease may rarely be possible in these circumstances. Nevertheless, within the curative settings, no significant predictive value regarding either overall or disease-free survival was found in this series. Three corresponding "high risk" patients are alive without disease at 5 to 11 years from hepatic resection. These patients with more advanced intrahepatic or concomitant limited extrahepatic disease require a particularly thorough diagnostic work up. As no superior therapeutic alternative is currently available, an aggressive surgical approach may occasionally be justified, and may, in a small portion, result in definite tumor control.     

Intraoperative Iatrogenic Rupture of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Intraoperative iatrogenic rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which can occur during hepatic resection when large tumors are being mobilized, may adversely affect the operative outcome. Little information is available in the literature on this serious intraoperative complication. The aim of the present study is to document iatrogenic rupture of HCC as a serious complication during hepatic resection and its effects on the operative and long-term outcomes of patients with this complication. A retrospective study was performed on all patients with intraoperative iatrogenic rupture of HCC during hepatic resection from 1989 to 1997, and the operative and long-term survival outcomes were compared with those of patients without the complication. Among 194 patients who underwent hepatic resection for a large HCC (> or =5 cm) during the study period, 8 (4.1%) had intraoperative iatrogenic rupture of the tumor. When compared with 186 patients with similar clinical parameters but without intraoperative rupture, patients with intraoperative rupture had significantly more intraoperative blood loss (median 5.7 vs. 2.0 L;p = 0.01) and blood transfusion requirement (median 3.1 vs 0.9 L; p = 0.02). On follow-up, patients in the intraoperative rupture group had a significantly higher intraperitoneal extrahepatic recurrence rate (33.3% vs. 2.9%; p =0.02) and significantly shorter survival (median 11.5 vs. 37.9 months,p = 0.04) when compared with patients without the complication. Intraoperative iatrogenic rupture is a serious complication of hepatic resection for HCC because it is associated with increased intraoperative blood loss, increased incidence of intraperitoneal extrahepatic recurrence, and short survival. Extreme care should be taken during mobilization of the tumor, and an alternative operative approach in the presence of a difficult hepatic resection of a large HCC may be required to avoid the complication.     

Primary retroperitoneal tumors. Treatment modality and prognostic factors

BACKGROUND: Primary Retroperitoneal Tumors (PRT) form a heterogeneous group of malignant mesenchymal and neuroectodermal neoplasms making up only 1% of all solid neoplasms. METHODS: From 1965 to 1997, 27 patients (16 females and 9 males, age range 19-79 years) underwent operations at the General and Cardiovascular Institute of University of Milan for primary retroperitoneal tumors (22 malignant and 5 benign, sarcomas represented 68% of all malignant tumors). A retrospective analysis of these patients was performed to determine the prognostic parameters associated with a favourable prognosis. All patients were admitted with severe abdominal pain or a palpable mass, other symptoms included fewer and weight loss. The median duration of symptoms before presentation was 16 months (range 15 days-5 years). Before surgical treatment abdominal and pulmonary CT scanning and MRN were undertaken on all patients with PRT to define the size of the tumor and the involvement of other retroperitoneal structures. RESULTS: Complete resection was possible in 54% of malignant tumors (n = 12), incomplete resection was performed in 14% (n = 3) and in 31% (n = 7) only biopsy was possible. Recurrent tumor developed in 25% of patients with total resection (n = 3), (median time to recurrence 5 years). Independent treatment variables (size, signs and symptoms, histopathologic findings and grade) and treatment-dependent variables (type of surgical treatment and adjuvant chemotherapy) were analyzed. Patients with complete resection had a 12 month survival of 100% (n = 12) compared to 50% (n = 1) for those undergoing partial resection and 14.2% (n = 1) for those with simple biopsy. A 24-month survival of the patients undergoing complete resection was 25% (n = 3). Median survival for type of surgical treatment was 28 months for complete resection compared to 14 months for partial resection and only 8 months for biopsy. Twelve-months survival for tumor grade was 100% (n = 7) for low grade tumor (G1), compared to 66.6% (n = 4) for median differentiated tumors (G2), and 37.5% (n = 3) for high grade tumors (G3). Twenty-four-months survival was 28.5% (n = 2) for low grade tumors compared to 16.6% (n = 1) of median differentiated tumors. High grade tumors were associated with a 35-month median survival time compared to 17 months for median differentiated tumors and 10 months for low grade tumors. Other variables (histopathologic findings, size, symptoms) had not significant impact on survival. Operative mortality rate was 3.7% (n = 1). The overall 2 years survival rate in patients with totally resected tumors was 25% (n = 3), (2G1, 1G2), while the 5 year survival rate was 16.6% (n = 2), (2G1). CONCLUSIONS: Complete surgical excision and low grade of the tumor are the most important parameters of survival. Recurrent disease is a vexing problem; a careful and prolonged follow-up based on the use of CT and MRN is recommended.     

Stage T1 bladder cancer: grade is the primary determinant for risk of muscle invasion

Tumor characteristics believed to predict for deep muscle invasion after transurethral resection of superficial bladder cancer alone were analyzed in 51 patients with stage T1 (stage A) transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. All patients were treated at Stanford University Medical Center and none had intravesical chemotherapy at any time during the median followup of 78 months. No patient had carcinoma in situ. A total of 14 patients (27%) had deep muscle invasion. None of the patients with grade 1, 5 (22%) with grade 2 and 9 (50%) with grade 3 to 4 tumors had deep muscle invasion. Comparison of the risk of muscle invasion using pathological tumor grade at diagnosis, highest grade at any cystoscopic biopsy before the diagnosis of muscle invasion or highest grade at cystoscopic biopsy immediately antecedent to the cystoscopy at which muscle invasion was diagnosed all showed similar probability of muscle invasion. Mean interval to development of muscle invasion was 6 and 12 months in the grades 2 and 3 to 4 groups, respectively. At 36 months the cumulative probability of invasion-free survival was 62% for grade 2, compared to 50% for grades 3 to 4 cancer patients (p less than 0.005, Gehan). Univariate regression analysis demonstrated grade to be the only significant factor in predicting for invasive disease (p = 0.005), with tumors in the bladder neck to be of borderline significance (p = 0.159). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, grade remained the single tumor variable predicting for invasive bladder cancer (p = 0.004). These data suggest that of routinely available data at diagnosis and during subsequent followup cystoscopic examinations, tumor grade is the most important biological predictor of progression to muscle invasive cancer.     

Prognostic factors in patients with primary transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract

A total of 50 patients with primary transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract underwent deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy characterization by flow cytometric analysis of paraffin embedded specimens. The primary tumor was diploid in 29 patients (58%) and aneuploid in 21 (42%). Aneuploidy was identified more frequently in grade 3 than in grades 1 and 2 neoplasms (p = 0.001). Additionally, grade 3 neoplasms occurred more often with invasive (stages T2 to T3) compared to superficial (stages TA, TIS and T1) tumors (p = 0.002). However, deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy was not significantly associated with tumor stage. Among the 49 patients treated by a definitive operation the median survival free of disease and median over-all survival were 33.7 and more than 120 months, respectively. Variables examined included deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy, tumor grade, tumor stage, primary tumor site and type of operation. In the univariate analysis deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy was the only significant predictor of survival free of disease (p = 0.04). Aneuploid tumors had a median survival free of disease of 19 versus 59 months for diploid tumors. However, in the multivariate analysis of factors affecting survival free of disease, the type of operation performed was the only significant variable. Patients undergoing nephroureterectomy with en bloc bladder cuff excision had a favorable survival free of disease (p = 0.04). Tumor stage was the only significant factor associated with over-all survival in univariate and multivariate analyses (p = 0.02 and 0.005, respectively). Patients with superficial tumors had a median survival of more than 120 versus 72 months for patients with invasive tumors. The data suggest that deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy may be a useful parameter to identify risk groups and plan the management of patients with primary transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract.     

影响胰头癌根治术预后的多因素分析——肿瘤出芽是预后的独立影响因素

目的探讨肿瘤出芽在胰头癌根治术后评价预后中的作用。方法肿瘤出芽定义为肿瘤浸润前沿的单个或一簇个数<5的肿瘤细胞,200倍显微镜视野下(0.785 mm2)计数肿瘤出芽的个数。回顾性分析2005～2010年67例因胰头癌行根治性切除术患者的临床病理资料及随访资料,对影响预后的临床病理因素进行多因素分析。结果 (1)67例胰头癌患者中肿瘤出芽个数0～59个/0.785 mm2,中位数19个/0.785 mm2。采用接受者运行曲线(ROC)定义肿瘤出芽个数≥17为肿瘤出芽高密度组,<17为肿瘤出芽低密度组。本研究肿瘤出芽高密度组39例(58.2%),低密度组28例(41.8%)。肿瘤出芽高密度组年龄小(P=0.007),T分期高(P=0.007),N分期高(P=0.002),AJCC分期高(P=0.004),神经浸润发生率高(P=0.004),组织学分级高(P=0.001),术后早期复发多(P=0.001),2年生存率低(P=0.000)。(2)存活26例,死亡41例。中位生存时间12个月(3～59个月)。单因素分析结果显示,T分期(P=0.009)、N分期(P=0.003)、AJCC分期(P=0.006)、组织学分级(P=0.034)和肿瘤出芽(P=0.000)与胰头癌患者的生存时间有关,多因素Cox回归分析结果显示,肿瘤出芽高密度是胰头癌患者预后的独立影响因素(HR=3.093,95%CI 1.314～7.283,P=0.010)。结论肿瘤出芽高密度是胰头癌根治性切除术后预后不良的重要因素。     

The impact of splenectomy on outcomes after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND: Splenectomy at the time of resection of esophageal, gastric, or colon cancer has been correlated with inferior longterm survival. No such effect has yet been demonstrated for pancreatic cancer. STUDY DESIGN: Patients undergoing resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with curative intent at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between October 1983 and October 1995 were identified from a prospective clinical database. The impact of splenectomy on hospital stay and survival was calculated with univariate and multivariate nonparametric methods. RESULTS: Of 332 patients undergoing pancreatectomy, 326 with confirmed local or regional disease only formed the study cohort. Of these, 37 underwent concomitant splenectomy (11.4%). Splenectomy was significantly correlated with distal or total pancreatectomy, primary location in tail or body, portal vein invasion or resection, a larger maximal tumor diameter, and an operative blood loss of greater than 2,000 mL. Death or need for reoperation was not affected by splenectomy. Patients undergoing splenectomy had a higher median transfusion requirement (3 versus 1; p = 0.002). The median postoperative length of stay was 15 days regardless of splenectomy. At a median followup of 16.3 months (36.4 months for surviving patients), the median actuarial survival was 12.2 months with splenectomy versus 17.8 months without splenectomy (p<0.005). On multivariate analysis, splenectomy emerged as an independent factor predictive of decreased postoperative survival (p = 0.02), in addition to pathologic lymph node status (p = 0.0002), tumor diameter (p = 0.0004), and tumor differentiation (p = 0.007). Tumor location within the pancreas and the type of pancreatectomy were not independent prognostic factors influencing survival. CONCLUSIONS: After pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer, splenectomy has no significant measurable impact on postoperative recovery, but has a negative influence on longterm survival independent of disease-related factors. Unless required because of tumor proximity or invasion, splenectomy should be avoided in the operative treatment of exocrine pancreatic cancer at any location.     

Primary thymic carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Thymic carcinoma is a malignancy of the anterior mediastinum, always with poor prognosis. Up to the present, very few articles have discussed and evaluated either the clinical or pathologic features or treatments of this tumor. Therefore, we are in a position to analyze our research data to support our belief as follows. METHODS: From January 1977 until December 1997, we received 614 patients who were diagnosed with anterior mediastinal tumors. Of the 614 patients, 38 patients (6.2%) were diagnosed with thymic carcinoma, including 26 men and 12 women. Data were collected from clinical records and personal interviews with the patients. Classification of these patients' tumor stages was based on the Masaoka staging system. RESULTS: We proceeded with surgery for 15 of the 38 patients to remove their tumors. Complete resection was done in 8 of these 15 patients (21.0%), whereas debulking was done in the other 7 (18.4%) patients. The mean survival time of all the patients in this study (excluding 3 patients who were lost to follow-up) was 53.0 months, with a median of 24.1 months. The overall cumulative survival rate was 38.6% at 3 years and 27.5% at 5 years. The data in this research show that tumor grading (p = 0.01), resectability (p = 0.02), and stage (p = 0.04) have statistically significant influence on patients' survival. CONCLUSIONS: The grade, stage, and resectability of the tumor are decisive factors of the effectiveness of either surgery or chemo/radiotherapies in the treatment of thymic carcinoma.     

ADULT PROSTATE SARCOMA: THE M. D. ANDERSON CANCER CENTER EXPERIENCE

PURPOSE: Sarcoma of prostate origin is rare. Historically, long-term survival rates for adult patients with prostate sarcoma are poor. We analyzed the experience of 1 institution with prostate sarcoma during the last 3 decades. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 21 patients with prostate sarcoma were reviewed to identify symptoms at presentation, diagnostic procedures, presence and development of metastases, staging evaluation, histological subtype, grade and size of the primary tumor, and treatment sequence, including surgery, and preoperative and postoperative therapies. Several clinicopathological variables were assessed for prognostic importance. RESULTS: Most patients presented with urinary obstruction. The diagnosis of prostate sarcoma was usually established with ultrasound guided biopsy or transurethral resection. Histological subtypes were leiomyosarcoma in 12, rhabdomyosarcoma in 4, malignant fibrous histiocytoma in 1 and unclassified sarcoma in 4 patients. At last followup, 8 patients had no evidence of disease after a median of 81.5 months (range 10 to 197). The remaining 13 patients died of sarcoma (median survival 18 months, range 3 to 94). The 1, 3 and 5-year actuarial survival rates for all 21 patients were 81%, 43% and 38%, respectively. Factors predictive of long-term survival were negative surgical margins (p = 0.0005) and absence of metastatic disease at presentation (p = 0.0004). Tumor size and grade, and the histological subtype of prostate sarcoma had no significant influence on actuarial survival. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term disease specific survival rate for adults with prostate sarcoma is poor. Early diagnosis and complete surgical resection offer patients the best chance for cure.     

食管鳞癌环周切缘的临床意义分析

目的:分析食管鳞癌环周切缘情况与患者术后生存预后的关系,并探讨其与临床病理特征的相关性。方法:收集河北医科大学第四医院2017年10月至2019年3月行食管癌根治性切除术后的患者资料,所有患者临床资料完整,术后病理均为进展期鳞癌。采集并分析患者性别、年龄、T分期、N分期、肿瘤位置、病变长度、大体病理类型、脉管瘤栓、神经...     

What is the optimal distal resection margin for esophageal carcinoma?

BACKGROUND: Whereas a proximal resection margin of 12 cm is recommended for complete resection of esophageal cancer, the extent of distal resection is unclear. METHODS: We examined distal resection margins in a consecutive series of patients who underwent esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinomas (n = 50), primary esophageal adenocarcinomas (n = 100), and adenocarcinomas of the cardia (n = 39), in whom all macroscopic tumor was judged to be completely resected. RESULTS: Microscopic tumor was found at a 3-cm distal resection margin for one multifocal squamous cell carcinoma. Positive distal resection margins were seen in 12% (12 of 100 patients) of primary esophageal adenocarcinomas (median, 2 cm versus 4 cm if negative; p = 0.002, Wilcoxon) and 28% (11 of 39 patients) of cardia adenocarcinomas (median, 1 cm versus 3 cm if negative; p = 0.02, Wilcoxon). Although pathologic stage was shown to be the only significant predictor of overall survival (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.8; 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 2.6; p = 0.007), there was a trend toward reduced postoperative survival for patients with histologically positive distal resection margins, in particular for patients with cardia adenocarcinomas (median, 15.4 months versus 5.7 months if negative; p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: To achieve consistently negative distal resection margins, we recommend resection of at least 5 cm of macroscopically normal foregut below the distal margin of the primary tumor.     

Adrenocortical carcinoma in surgically treated patients: a retrospective study on 156 cases by the French Association of Endocrine Surgery.

BACKGROUND. Because of the rarity of adrenocortical carcinoma, survival rates and prognosis for patients who have undergone operation are not well known. The purpose of the French Association of Endocrine Surgery was to evaluate these factors in all patients treated during a 12-year period by its members. METHODS. One hundred fifty-six patients (95 women, 61 men) with a mean age of 47 years were included. Functional symptoms were found in 52% of patients, and hormonal studies revealed secreting tumors in 62% of cases. Ninety-four percent of the patients underwent resection of the adrenal tumor, and 20% of them had extensive resection because of invasive cancers. Complete resection was achieved in 127 patients (81%) and incomplete resection in 29 patients. Mean tumor weight was 714 gm (range, 12 to 4750 gm), and the mean diameter was 12 cm (range, 3 to 30 cm). The results of the tumor staging were stage I, eight patients (5%); stage II (local disease), 75 patients (48%); stage III (locoregional disease), 39 patients (25%); and stage IV (metastases), 34 patients (22%). RESULTS. The 5-year actuarial survival rates were 34% overall, 42% in curative group, 53% in local cancer group, 24% in regional disease group, and 27% in the reoperated group. One-year actuarial survival rate of the palliative group was 9% (median survival, 6 months). Multivariate analysis showed that better prognosis occurred in patients younger than 35 years of age (p = 0.01) and in patients with androgen-secreting tumors, precursor-secreting tumors, or nonsecreting tumors (p = 0.003). Mitotane improved the survival rate only in patients with metastases who received it after operation (vs non-mitotane-treated patients [p < 0.05]). CONCLUSIONS. In this study age, extent of disease, aspect of the surgical resection, and type of hormonal secretion influenced survival.     

Long-term survival after curative resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clinicopathologic analysis of 5-year survivors.

OBJECTIVE: The authors reviewed the clinicopathologic characteristics of patients who underwent resection with curative intent for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas between 1983 and 1989. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Recent studies have demonstrated a reduction in the morbidity and mortality of pancreatic resection and improvement in the actuarial 5-year survival for patients with resected ductal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Resection with curative intent was performed on 118 of 684 patients (17%) with pancreatic cancer admitted to the authors' institution. Clinical, demographic, treatment, and pathologic variables were analyzed. The original material for all cases was reviewed; nonductal cancers were excluded. RESULTS: The head of the gland was the predominant tumor site (n = 102), followed by the body (n = 9), and tail (n = 7). Seventy-two percent of the patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomies, 15% underwent total pancreatectomies, 10% underwent distal pancreatectomies, and 3% underwent distal subtotal pancreatectomies. Operative mortality was 3.4%. Median survival was 14.3 months after resection compared with 4.9 months if patients did not undergo resection (p < 0.0001). Twelve patients survived 5 years after surgery (10.2% overall actual 5-year survival rate). Three of the tumors were well differentiated, five were moderately differentiated, and four were poorly differentiated. Extrapancreatic invasion occurred in nine cases (75%), and perineural invasion was present in ten cases (83%). Five tumors exhibited invasion of duodenum, ampulla of Vater, and/or common bile duct, and an additional tumor invaded the portal vein. Lymph node involvement by carcinoma was noted in five cases (42%). Six patients remain alive without evidence of disease at a median follow-up of 101 months (range, 82-133 months). Five patients died of recurrent or metastatic pancreatic cancer at 60, 61, 62, 64, and 64 months, respectively. One patient died at 84 months of metastatic lung cancer without evidence of recurrent pancreatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: This paper emphasizes the grim prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Five-year survival cannot be equated to cure. Although pancreatectomy offers the only chance for long-term survival, it should be considered as the best palliative procedure currently available for the majority of patients. This emphasizes the need for the development of novel and effective adjuvant therapies for this disease.     

Progression of stage T1 bladder tumors after intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin

Of 221 patients with superficial bladder tumors (stages Ta, Tis and T1) treated by transurethral resection and an initial 6-week course of intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) 195 were evaluated after 3 months for local response. Of these patients 17 (8.7%) had a stage T1 tumor, of whom 14 (82%) subsequently had muscle invasion (7), uncontrolled local disease (6) or metastasis (1). The median interval to progression was 8.4 months, which was significantly (p = 0.0001) less than among the other 178 patients with a nonstage T1 lesion or no tumor found at 3 months, of whom 44 (25%) had progression (median more than 5 years). These data suggest that patients with stage T1 tumor 3 months after BCG therapy require additional therapy other than simple tumor resection and meticulous followup.     

Retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcomas: prognosis and treatment of primary and recurrent disease

Soft-tissue sarcomas of the retroperitoneum constitute a heterogeneous group of tumors with varying histology, potential for complete resection, and propensity for recurrent disease-making the development of effective treatment difficult and challenging. A retrospective review of 23 patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas from 1985 through 1998 was performed to assess the biological behavior and clinical outcomes and to identify factors that may influence prognosis and optimize treatment strategy. Liposarcomas were the most common pathology (61%); 79 per cent of these were of low grade. Leiomyosarcomas were the next most common pathology (30%); 43 per cent of these were of low grade. Low-grade sarcomas overall accounted for 62 per cent of the total group. Low-grade tumors independent of histologic type exhibited good prognosis for long-term survival with a median survival of 44 months. In contrast, intermediate- or high-grade tumors were associated with a median survival of only 9 months (P < 0.02). On the other hand, tumor histologic type independent of grade did not have a significant survival difference. Complete tumor resection was possible in 21 of 23 patients, which gives an overall resectability rate of 91 per cent. Eight patients (36%) remain disease-free after initial surgical treatment. However, local recurrence was common; this occurred in 11 of 22 patients (50%). Local recurrence, however, did not preclude long-term survival. Surgical resection of recurrent disease was done in nine patients with a median survival of 91 months (range 24-150 months). Three patients had as many as three operations for recurrent disease. With subsequent recurrences there was a decrease in interval from approximately 4 years to 2 years, and 33 per cent of these patients developed tumor dedifferentiation to high grade. An aggressive surgical approach with reoperation can produce prolonged survival in patients with low-grade retroperitoneal sarcoma.