Influence of a machined collar on crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a histometric study in the canine mandible

Background: It has been shown that peri‐implant crestal bone reactions are influenced by both a rough–smooth implant border in one‐piece, non‐submerged, as well as an interface (microgap [MG] between implant/abutment) in two‐piece butt‐joint, submerged and non‐submerged implants being placed at different levels in relation to the crest of the bone. According to standard surgical procedures, the rough–smooth implant border for implants with a smooth collar should be aligned with the crest of the bone exhibiting a smooth collar adjacent to peri‐implant soft tissues. No data, however, are available for implants exhibiting a sandblasted, large‐grit and acid‐etched (SLA) surface all the way to the top of a non‐submerged implant. Thus, the purpose of this study is to histometrically examine crestal bone changes around machined versus SLA‐surfaced implant collars in a side‐by‐side comparison. Methods: A total of 60 titanium implants (30 machined collars and 30 SLA collars) were randomly placed in edentulous mandibular areas of five foxhounds forming six different subgroups (implant subgroups A to F). The implants in subgroups A to C had a machined collar (control), whereas the implants in subgroups D to F were SLA‐treated all the way to the top (MG level; test). Furthermore, the MGs of the implants were placed at different levels in relation to the crest of the bone: the implants in subgroups A and E were 2 mm above the crest, in subgroups C and D 1 mm above, in subgroup B 3 mm above, and in subgroup F at the bone crest level. For all implants, abutment healing screws were connected the day of surgery. These caps were loosened and immediately retightened monthly. At 6 months, animals were sacrificed and non‐decalcified histology was analyzed by evaluating peri‐implant crestal bone levels. Results: For implants in subgroup A, the estimated mean crestal bone loss (± SD) was ?0.52 ± 0.40 mm; in subgroup B, +0.16 ± 0.40 mm (bone gain); in subgroup C, ?1.28 ± 0.21 mm; in subgroup D, ?0.43 ± 0.43 mm; in subgroup E, ?0.03 ± 0.48 mm; and in subgroup F, ?1.11 ± 0.27 mm. Mean bone loss for subgroup A was significantly greater than for subgroup E (P = 0.034) and bone loss for subgroup C was significantly greater than for subgroup D (P <0.001). Conclusions: Choosing a completely SLA‐surfaced non‐submerged implant can reduce the amount of peri‐implant crestal bone loss and reduce the distance from the MG to the first bone–implant contact around unloaded implants compared to implants with a machined collar. Furthermore, a slightly exposed SLA surface during implant placement does not seem to compromise the overall hard and soft tissue integration and, in some cases, results in coronal bone formation in this canine model.     

Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model

OBJECTIVES: Test of favourable conditions for osseointegration with respect to optimum bone-implant contact (BIC) in a loaded animal model. The varied parameters were surface roughness and surface topography of commercially available dental implants. METHOD: Thirty-two implants of six types of macro and microstructure were included in the study (total 196). The different types were: minimally rough control: Branemark machined Mk III; oxidized surface: TiUnite MkIII and MkIV; ZL Ticer; blasted and etched surface: Straumann SLA; rough control: titanium plasma sprayed (TPS). Sixteen beagle dogs were implanted with the whole set of the above implants. After a healing period of 8 weeks, implants were loaded for 3 months. For the evaluation of the BIC areas, adequately sectioned biopsies were visualized by subsurface scans with confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). RESULTS: The primary statistical analysis testing BIC of the moderately rough implants (mean 56.1+/-13.0%) vs. the minimally rough and the rough controls (mean 53.9+/-11.2%) does not reveal a significant difference (P=0.57). Mean values of 50-70% BIC were found for all implant types. Moderately rough oxidized implants show a median BIC, which is 8% higher than their minimally rough turned counterpart. The intraindividual difference between the TPS and the blasted and etched counterparts revealed no significant difference. The turned and the oxidized implants show median values of the resonance frequency [implant stability quotients (ISQ)] over 60; the nonself-tapping blasted and etched and TPS implants show median values below 60. DISCUSSION: In conclusion, the benefit of rough surfaces relative to minimally rough ones in this loaded animal model was confirmed histologically. The comparison of different surface treatment modalities revealed no significant differences between the modern moderately rough surfaces. Resonance frequency analysis seems to be influenced in a major part by the transducer used, thus prohibiting the comparison of different implant systems.     

Effects of implant design on marginal bone changes around early loaded, chemically modified, sandblasted Acid-etched-surfaced implants: a histologic analysis in dogs

Background: A minimal marginal bone loss around implants during early healing has been considered acceptable. However, the preservation of the marginal bone is related to soft tissue stability and esthetics. Implant designs and surfaces were evaluated to determine their impact on the behavior of the crestal bone. The purpose of this study is to evaluate histologic marginal bone level changes around early loaded, chemically modified, sandblasted acid‐etched–surfaced implants with a machined collar (MC) or no MC (NMC). Methods: Three months after a tooth extraction, 72 sandblasted acid‐etched chemically modified implants were placed in six dogs. Thirty‐six implants had NMC, and 36 implants had a 2.8‐mm MC. All implants were loaded 21 days after placement. For histologic analyses, specimens were obtained at 3 and 12 months. Assessments of the percentage of the total bone‐to‐implant contact and linear measurements of the distance from the shoulder of the implant to the first bone‐to‐implant contact (fBIC) were performed. Based on fBIC measurements, estimates of bone loss were obtained for each implant. A mixed‐model analysis of variance was used to assess the effects of implant type and sacrifice time. Results: All implants achieved osseointegration. The mean bone gain observed around NMC early loaded implants (at 3 months: 0.13 ± 0.37 mm; at 12 months: 0.13 ± 0.44 mm) was significantly different from the mean bone loss for MC early loaded implants (at 3 months: ?0.32 ± 0.70 mm; at 12 months: ?0.79 ± 0.35 mm) at 3 months (P = 0.003) and 12 months (P <0.001). No infrabony component was present at the marginal fBIC around NMC implants in most cases. There were no statistically significant differences among the means of total bone contact for implant types. Conclusions: Chemically modified, sandblasted acid‐etched–surfaced implants with NMC presented crestal bone gain after 3 and 12 months under loading conditions in the canine mandible. The implant design and surface were determinants in the marginal bone level preservation.     

In Vitro Assessment of Primary Stability of Straumann® Implant Designs

Background: Primary implant stability (PS) is one of the main factors influencing implant survival rate. Several methods to determine the PS have been used, such as Periotest values (PVs) and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) with implant stability quotient (ISQ) values. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare different implant designs in regard to PS assessed by Periotest and RFA in vitro. Materials and Methods: A total of 90 implants were placed in freshly slaughtered cow ribs. The implants (Straumann®, Institute Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland; length 10 mm, ø3.3 mm) had the following three designs: Bone Level (BL, 30 implants), Standard Plus (SP, 30 implants), and Tapered Effect (TE, 30 implants). Before implant placement, the investigator was calibrated for every design according to the manufacturer's instructions. An independent observer, blinded to the study, assessed the accuracy of placement. RFA based on the Osstell device and PVs were performed after abutment connection. One‐way analysis of variance and Tukey's post hoc test were used for statistical evaluation. Results: All implants were mechanically stable. The mean PV for BL was ?4.67(± 1.18), for SP, ?6.07(± 0.94), and for TE, ?6.57(± 0.57). The mean ISQ values were 75.02(± 3.65), 75.98(± 3.00), and 79.83(± 1.85), respectively. The one‐way ANOVA showed significant difference among three implant designs in PV (p < .0001) and for the ISQ between BL/TE or SP/TE implants (p < .0001). In addition, the Tukey's (pair‐wise comparison) test showed significant differences in PV and RFA between the BL/TE (p < .0001). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, higher implant stability was found for tapered designed implants.     

Stability, marginal bone loss and survival of standard and modified sand-blasted, acid-etched implants in bilateral edentulous spaces: a prospective 15-month evaluation

Objectives: Chemical modification of the already proven sand‐blasted and acid‐etched (SLA) implant had increased its surface wettability and consequent early‐term osseointegration characteristics. The aim of this clinical trial was to compare the stability changes, success, survival, peri‐implant parameters and marginal bone loss (MBL) of the early‐loaded standard (SLA) and modified sand‐blasted, acid‐etched (modSLA) implants. Material and methods: A total of 96 SLA and modSLA implants were placed in a bi‐lateral, cross‐arch position to the jaws of 22 patients. Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was used to measure the implant stability in the surgery and following healing after 1, 3 and 6 weeks. At the stage of loading, a panoramic X‐ray was obtained and RFA measurement was repeated for all implants. Implants were restored by metal–ceramic crowns and followed for 1 year to determine the success, survival rate, peri‐implant parameters and MBL. Results were compared by one‐ and two‐way ANOVA, log‐rank test and generalized linear mixed models (P<0.05). Results: One modSLA implant was lost after 3 weeks following the surgery yielding to a 100 and 97.91% success rate for SLA and modSLA implants, respectively (P=0.323). At the loading stage, modSLA implants showed significantly lower MBL (0.18 ± 0.05 mm) than SLA implants (0.22 ± 0.06 mm; P=0.002). In the loading stage, RFA value of the modSLA implants (60.42 ± 6.82) was significantly higher than the both implant types in the surgical stage (55.46 ± 8.29 and 56.68 ± 8.19), and following 1 (56.08 ± 7.01 and 55.60 ± 9.07) and 3 weeks of healing (55.94 ± 5.95 and 55.40 ± 6.50 for SLA and modSLA implants, respectively). Conclusions: modSLA implants demonstrated a better stability and a reduced MBL at the loading stage. Both SLA and modSLA implants demonstrated a favorable success and survival at the end of 15‐month follow‐up. To cite this article :
Karabuda ZC, Abdel‐Haq J. Arιsan V. Stability, marginal bone loss and survival of standard and modified sand‐blasted, acid‐etched implants in bilateral edentulous spaces: a prospective 15‐month evaluation.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 840–849
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02065.x     

Radiological and clinical follow-up of machined- and anodized-surface implants after mean functional loading for 33 months

Abstract: The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare peri‐implant bone loss and mucosal conditions around machined‐surface (MS) and anodized‐surface (AS) interforaminal implants in the mandible at least 30 months after placement. Fifty patients, each treated with four interforaminal screw‐type implants consecutively, were included. Thirty‐one patients (62%) with a total number of 124 implants (64 MS and 60 AS implants, both Brånemark type MKIII) were available for follow‐up. Rotational panoramic radiographs were used for evaluating marginal bone loss. Clinically, marginal plaque index (mPI), bleeding on probing (BOP) and pocket probing depth (PPD) were evaluated. AS implants showed significantly less marginal bone loss than MS implants (−1.17±0.13 vs. −1.42±0.13 mm; P=0.03). Marginal bone loss around distal implants was less pronounced at AS implants (−1.05±0.14 mm) when compared with MS implants (−1.46±0.14 mm; P=0.05). Within the smoking group, there was less peri‐implant bone loss around AS implants than around MS implants (−1.08±0.27 vs. −1.83±0.2; P=0.04). No differences between MS and AS implants were found with respect to mPI (57% vs. 67%), BOP (21% vs. 17%) and mean PPD (2.59±0.29 vs. 2.56±0.28 mm). Overall, both types of implants, in combination with bar‐supported overdentures, can produce excellent long‐term results in the interforaminal edentulous mandible with less peri‐implant bone loss around rough implant surfaces, which had beneficial effects at distal implants and in smokers.     

Osseointegration and stability of a modified sand-blasted acid-etched implant: an experimental pilot study in sheep

Objective: The aim of this pilot study was to compare the early‐term osseointegration characteristics of standard (SLA) and modified sand‐blasted and acid‐etched (modSLA) implants in an experimental animal model. Material and methods: A total of 30 SLA and modSLA implants were placed to the tibiae of three sheep and the insertion torque value (ITV) and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements were performed. RFA measurement was repeated on 3 and 6 weeks healed implants after which the animals were sacrificed for histomorphometric analysis. Bone‐to‐implant contact was assessed on the non‐decalcified sections. Six weeks healed implants were also subjected to the reverse torque test (RTT). Results were analyzed by the Friedman test, Kruskal–Wallis test and Spearman rank correlation test. Results: All implants reached to a strong primary stability with a mean 36.13 ± 2.47 and 35.47 ± 2.85 N/cm ITV. In the surgical stage, RFA values for SLA and modSLA implants were found to be 72.27 ± 3.17 and 71.6 ± 2.87, respectively. After 3 weeks of healing, mean BIC% (80.64 ± 13.89%) and RFA value (76.8 ± 1.14) of modSLA implants were significantly higher (P=0.0002) than that of SLA implants (64.39 ± 21.2 BIC% and 74.2 ± 4.76 RFA). However, no statistically significant difference between SLA and modSLA implants was recorded after 6 weeks of healing. Both implants revealed similar results in the RTT test (115.2 ± 4.14 and 117 ± 4.47 N/cm for SLA and modSLA implants, respectively). No correlation was found between RFA and BIC%. Conclusion: Within the limits of this pilot study, it can be concluded that modSLA implants achieve a higher bone contact and stability at earlier time points when compared with SLA implants. To cite this article:
Abdel‐Haq J, Karabuda CZ, Arιsan V, Mutlu Z, Kürkçü M. Osseointegration and stability of a modified sand‐blasted acid‐etched implant: an experimental pilot study in sheep.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 265–274.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.01990.x     

Early loading of single crowns supported by 6‐mm‐long implants with a moderately rough surface: a prospective 2‐year follow‐up cohort study

Aim: To evaluate prospectively the clinical and radiographic outcomes after 2 years of loading of 6 mm long moderately rough implants supporting single crowns in the posterior regions. Material and methods: Forty SLActive Straumann^® short (6 mm) implants were placed in 35 consecutively treated patients. Nineteen implants, 4.1 mm in diameter, and 21 implants, 4.8 mm in diameter, were installed. Implants were loaded after 6 weeks of healing. Implant survival rate, marginal bone loss and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) were evaluated at different intervals. The clinical crown/implant ratio was also calculated. Results: Two out of 40 implants were lost before loading. Hence, the survival rate before loading was 95%. No further technical or biological complications were encountered during the 2‐year follow‐up. The mean marginal bone loss before loading was 0.34±0.38 mm. After loading, the mean marginal bone loss was 0.23±0.33 and 0.21±0.39 mm at the 1‐ and 2‐year follow‐ups. The RFA values increased between insertion (70.2±9) and the 6‐week evaluation (74.8±6.1). The clinical crown/implant ratio increased with time from 1.5 at the delivery of the prosthesis to 1.8 after 2 years of loading. Conclusion: Short implants (6 mm) with a moderately rough surface loaded early (after 6 weeks) during healing yielded high implant survival rates and moderate loss of bone after 2 years of loading. Longer observation periods are needed to draw more definite conclusions on the reliability of short implants supporting single crowns. To cite this article:
Rossi F, Ricci E, Marchetti C, Lang NP, Botticelli D. Early loading of single crowns supported by 6‐mm‐long implants with a moderately rough surface: a prospective 2‐year follow‐up cohort study.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21 , 2010; 937–943.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.01942.x     

Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite®, Osseotite®, SLA® and TiOblast® implants

Objective: To investigate implant stability using resonance frequency measurements of topographically changed and/or surface chemistry‐modified implants in rabbit bone. Material and methods: Six groups of microstructured, screw‐shaped titanium implants: two oxidized, cation‐incorporated experimental implants [Mg implants and MgMp implants with micropatterned thread flanges (80–150 μm wide and 60–70 μm deep)] and four commercially available clinical implants (TiUnite^®, Osseotite^®, SLA^®, and TiOblast^®) were installed in 10 rabbit tibia for 6 weeks. The surface properties of the implants were characterized in detail using several analytical techniques. Implant stability was measured using a resonance frequency analyzer (Osstell^?). Results: Surface characterization of the implants revealed microstructured, moderately rough implant surfaces varying 0.7–1.4 μm in S_a (mean height deviation), but with clear differences in surface chemistry. After 6 weeks, all implants showed statistically significantly higher increases in implant stability. When compared with one another, MgMp implants showed the most significant mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) value relative to the others (P≤0.016). In terms of increment (ΔISQ) in implant stability, MgMp implants showed a significantly greater value as compared with Osseotite^® (P≤0.005), TiOblast^® (P≤0.005), TiUnite^® (P≤0.005), SLA^® (P≤0.007), and Mg implants (P≤0.012). In addition, transducer direction dependence of resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements was observed such that the differences in the mean ISQ values between longitudinal and perpendicular measurements were significant at implant placement (P≤0.004) and after 6 weeks (P≤0). Conclusion: The present study found that implant surface properties influence RFA measurements of implant stability. Surface chemistry‐modified titanium implants showed higher mean ISQ values than did topographically changed implants. In particular, cation (magnesium)‐incorporated micropatterns in MgMp implants may play a primary role in ΔISQ.     

The Effects of Superficial Roughness and Design on the Primary Stability of Dental Implants

Background: Primary implant stability has been used as an indicator for future osseointegration and whether an immediate/early loading protocol should be applied. Implant stability is the key to clinical success. Purpose: The aim of this work was to analyze the influence of the design and surface morphology on the primary stability of dental implants. The insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) were the parameters used to measure the primary stability of the implants. Materials and Methods: Thirty implants, divided in six groups of five samples were placed in cylinder of high molecular weight polyethylene. The groups were different upon two designs (cylindrical and conic) and three implant surfaces finishing (machined, acid etched, and anodized). The insertion torque was quantified by a digital torque driver (Lutron Electronic Enterprise Co., Taipei, Taiwan) and the resonance frequency was measured by Osstell mentor? (Integration Diagnostics AB, Göteborg, Sweden). The implant surface morphology was characterized by scanning electron microscopy, roughness measurement, and friction coefficient. Results: The machined implants showed smaller insertion torques than treated implant surfaces. There were no differences between the RFA measurements in all tested surfaces. Statistical analyses demonstrated no correlation between the dental implant insertion torque and primary stability measured by the RFA. The implants with treated surfaces showed greater roughness, a higher friction coefficient, and demanded a larger insertion torque than machined implants. The results of the surface roughness and friction coefficients are in accordance with the results of the insertion torque. The difference, across the insertion torque values, between conical and cylindrical implants, can be explained by the different contact surface area among the thread geometry of these implants. Conclusion: The maximum implant insertion torque depends on the implant geometry, thread form, and implant surface morphology. The placement of conical implants with treated surfaces required the highest insertion torque. There was no correlation between RFA and insertion torque implant.     

Effect of Nanoscale Topography of Titanium Implants on Bone Vessel Network,Osteocytes, and Mineral Densities

Background: Chemical and physical properties of an implant surface have a major influence on the structure of peri‐implant bone and thus may influence the clinical performance of the implant. This study aims to evaluate the bone microstructure around implants with and without added nanometer‐sized calcium phosphate particles. Methods: An implant with dual acid‐etched surface (control) and an implant with dual acid‐etched surface and CaP nanoparticles (test) were placed in the posterior maxilla of 15 patients. Bone microstructure was evaluated for osteocyte density (OD), bone vessel volume density (BVVD), and bone mineral density (BMD). Results: BVVD was 1.806 ± 0.05 for test implants and 1.533 ± 0.10 for control implants (P <0.001). BMD_low was 17.4 × 10⁴ µm² for test implants and 15.0 × 10⁴ µm² for control implants (P = 0.025). Results from the BMD_high comparison, test versus control, were not statistically significant (P >0.05). OD was 575.6 ± 63.7 mm² for test implants and 471.2 ± 61.9 mm² for control implants (P <0.001). Conclusions: After 8 weeks of healing, the bone microstructure around test implants appeared to be significantly more organized. Clinical implications of these results include shortened healing time and indication for earlier loading protocols.     

A Retrospective Comparison of Oxidized and Turned Implants with Respect to Implant Survival,Marginal Bone Level and Peri‐Implant Soft Tissue Conditions after at Least 5 Years in Function

Background: Long‐term clinical follow‐up studies comparing different implant surfaces with regard to survival and marginal conditions are rare. Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the clinical performance of turned and oxidized implants after more than 5 years of loading Material and Methods: One hundred three patients (43 men, 60 women; mean age 67.4 years, range 32–90) previously treated with 287 implants (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden), 133 with turned surface (MKIII, Nobel Biocare AB) and 154 with an oxidized surface (MKIII, TiUnite, Nobel Biocare AB) were examined after at least 5 years of loading (mean 82 months, range 60–93 months). The implants had been used for support of single crowns (33 patients/36 implants), partial bridges (39 patients/103 implants), or full bridges (31 patients/148 implants) following an early loading protocol (14 patients /54 implants), a one‐stage protocol (32 patients/59 implants) or a two‐stage protocol (57 patients/174 implants). Clinical examinations of bleeding on probing (BoP) and pocket depth (PD) were performed. Intraoral radiographs were used for assessments of marginal bone levels (MBLs). Results: Seven turned implants and one oxidized implant failed, giving overall cumulative survival rates of 94.7 and 99.4%, respectively. There were no differences for BoP scores (0.5 ± 0.7 vs 0.4 ± 0.6) and PD measurements (1.7 ± 0.8 mm vs 1.8 ± 1.0 mm) parameters when comparing turned and oxidized implants, respectively. The mean MBL was 1.8 ± 0.8 mm and 2.0 ± 0.9 mm for turned and oxidized implants, respectively, after more than 5 years in function (NS). Frequency distribution of MBL loss showed no statistically significant differences between the two surfaces. A total of four implants (1.4%) (three oxidized and one turned) showed a PD > 3 mm, MBL > 4 mm, and BoP. However, none of these were associated with suppuration on examination. Conclusion: The present study does not state any differences in implant failure, MBL, presence of bleeding or PD around implants when comparing turned and oxidized titanium implants after at least 5 years of function.     

Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study

Objective: The aim of this biomechanical study was to assess the interrelated effect of both surface roughness and surgical technique on the primary stability of dental implants. Material and methods: For the experiment, 160 screw‐designed implants (Biocomp^®), with either a machined or an etched surface topography, were inserted into polyurethane foam blocks (Sawbones^®). As an equivalent of trabecular bone, a density of 0.48 g/cm³ was chosen. To mimic the cortical layer, on top of these blocks short‐fibre‐filled epoxy sheets were attached with a thickness varying from 0 to 2.5 mm. The implant sites were prepared using either a press‐fit or an undersized technique. To measure the primary stability of the implant, both the insertion and the removal torques were scored. Results: Independent of the surgical technique used, both implant types showed an increased insertion and removal torque values with increasing cortical thickness, although >2 mm cortical layer no further increase in insertion torque was observed. In the models with only trabecular bone (without cortical layer) and with a 1 mm cortical layer, both implant types showed a statistically higher insertion and removal torque values for undersized compared with the press‐fit technique. In addition, etched implants showed a statistically higher insertion and removal torque mean values compared with machined implants. In the models with 2 and 2.5 mm cortical layers, with respect to the insertion torque values, no effect of either implantation technique or implant surface topography could be observed. Conclusion: The placement of etched implants in synthetic bone models using an undersized preparation technique resulted in enhanced primary implant stability. A correlation was found between the primary stability and the cortical thickness. However, at or above a cortical thickness of 2 mm, the effect of both an undersized surgical approach, as also the presence of a roughened (etched) implant surface, had no extra effect. Besides the mechanical aspects, the biological effect of undersized drilling, i.e. the bone response on the extra insertion torque forces should also be elucidated. Therefore, additional in vivo studies are needed. To cite this article:
Tabassum A, Meijer GJ, Wolke JGC, Jansen JA. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21 , 2010; 213–220.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01823.x     

In vivo performance of zirconia and titanium implants: a histomorphometric study in mini pig maxillae

Objectives: To compare the bone tissue response to surface‐modified zirconia (ZrO₂) and titanium implants. Methods: Cylindrical low‐pressure injection moulded zirconia (ZrO₂) implants were produced with an acid‐etched surface. Titanium implants with identical shape, sandblasted and acid‐etched surface (SLA) served as controls. Eighteen adult miniature pigs received both implant types in the maxilla 6 months after extraction of the canines and incisors. The animals were euthanized after 4, 8 and 12 weeks and 16 zirconia and 18 titanium implants with the surrounding tissue were retrieved, embedded in methylmethacrylate and stained with Giemsa–Eosin. The stained sections were digitized and histomorphometrically analysed with regard to peri‐implant bone density (bone volume/total volume) and bone–implant contact (BIC) ratio. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney' U‐test. Results: Histomorphometrical analysis showed direct osseous integration for both materials. ZrO₂ implants revealed mean peri‐implant bone density values of 60.4% (SD ± 9.9) at 4 weeks, 65.4% (SD ± 13.8) at 8 weeks, and 63.3% (SD ± 21.5) at 12 weeks after implantation, whereas Ti‐SLA implants demonstrated mean values of 61.1% (SD ± 6.2), 63.6% (SD ± 6.8) and 68.2% (SD ± 5.8) at corresponding time intervals. Concerning the BIC ratio, the mean values for ZrO₂ ranged between 67.1% (SD ± 21.1) and 70% (SD ± 14.5) and for Ti‐SLA between 64.7% (SD ± 9.4) and 83.7% (SD ± 10.3). For the two parameters investigated, no significant differences between both types of implants could be detected at any time point. Conclusion: The results indicate that there was no difference in osseointegration between ZrO₂ implants and Ti‐SLA controls regarding peri‐implant bone density and BIC ratio. To cite this article :
Gahlert M, Roehling S, Sprecher CM, Kniha H, Milz S, Bormann K. In vivo performance of zirconia and titanium implants: a histomorphometric study in mini pig maxillae.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23 , 2012; 281–286.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02157.x     

Evaluation of a New Titanium‐Zirconium Dental Implant: A Biomechanical and Histological Comparative Study in the Mini Pig

Background: Titanium zirconium alloy with 13–17% zirconium (TiZr1317) shows significantly better mechanical attributes than pure Ti with respect to elongation and fatigue strength. This material may be suitable for thin implants and implant components exposed to high mechanical constraints. Purpose: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that TiZr1317 and Ti implants show comparable osseointegration and stability. Materials and Methods: The mandibular premolars (P1, P2, P3) and the first molar (M1) in 12 adult miniature pigs were extracted 3 months prior to the study. Six specially designed implants made from Ti (commercially pure, Grade 4) or TiZr1317 (Roxolid®, Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) with a hydrophilic sandblasted and acid‐etched (SLActive, Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) surface were placed in each mandible; three standard implants modified for evaluation of removal torque (RT) in one side and three bone‐chamber implants for histologic observations in the contralateral side. RT tests were performed after 4 weeks when also the bone chamber implants and surrounding tissue were biopsied for histologic analyses in ground sections. Results: The RT results indicated significantly higher stability (p = 0.013) for TiZr1317 (230.9 ± 22.4 Ncm) than for Ti implants (204.7 ± 24.0 Ncm). The histology showed similar osteoconductive properties for both implant types. Histomorphometric measurements showed a statistically significant higher (p = 0.023) bone area within the chamber for the TiZr1317 implants (45.5 ± 13.2%) than did the Ti implants (40.2 ± 15.2%). No difference was observed concerning the bone to implant contact between the groups with 72.3 ± 20.5% for Ti and 70.2 ± 17.3% for TiZr1317 implants. Conclusion: It is concluded that the TiZr1317 implant with a hydrophilic sandblasted and acid‐etched surface showed similar or even stronger bone tissue responses than the Ti control implant     

Effect of surface topography of screw-shaped titanium implants in humans on clinical and radiographic parameters: a 12-year prospective study

Objectives: Although implants with a roughened surface are widely used today, little is known about the long-term effect of a roughened surface compared with the conventional machined surface on clinical and radiographic parameters. The purpose of this study is to investigate the long-term differences between moderately rough (tioblasted) titanium implants and minimally rough machined/turned surfaces with respect to marginal bone resorption and the peri-implant soft tissues in the same patient.
Material and methods: In 20 fully edentulous patients, with severely resorbed mandibles, a total of 80 Astra Tech dental implants were placed in the mandible to support a bar construction with a full overdenture. In each patient two minimally rough-surfaced (turned) and two moderately rough-surfaced (tioblast) implants were placed alternately. Clinical evaluation was carried out at base line (prosthetic installation), 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 12 years. Radiographic evaluation using standardized individual filmholders was carried out at base line (prosthetic installation), 6 months, 1, 5 and 12 years.
Results: In two patients, during the abutment surgery, one turned implant showed insufficient osseointegration and was replaced. One implant showed an abutment fracture after 9 years and was kept as a sleeper. From base line up to 12 years, no implant was lost. No significant differences were found between both implant surfaces concerning the clinical parameters such as plaque, calculus, bleeding and probing pocket depth. The mean (SD) marginal bone changes up to 12 years varied between –0.11 and +0.01 mm for the turned and −0.2 and +0.01 mm for the tioblast implants. No significant difference in marginal bone loss was found between both implant surfaces.
Conclusion: We conclude that after 12 years of follow-up, no differences could be found between the turned and the tioblasted implants, both for soft and for hard tissue parameters.     

Space-providing expanded polytetrafluoroethylene devices define alveolar augmentation at dental implants induced by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 in an absorbable collagen sponge carrier

Background: Surgical implantation of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP‐2) in an absorbable collagen sponge carrier (ACS) significantly enhances bone regeneration in horizontal alveolar defects; however, sufficient quantities of bone for implant dentistry are not routinely obtained. Purpose: The objective of this proof‐of‐principle study was to evaluate the potential of a space‐providing macroporous expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) device to control volume and geometry of rhBMP‐2/ACS‐induced alveolar bone augmentation. Materials and Methods: Bilateral critical‐size supra‐alveolar periimplant defects were created in four Hound‐Labrador mongrel dogs. Two turned and one surface‐etched 10 mm titanium dental implants were placed 5 mm into the surgically reduced alveolar ridge creating 5 mm supra‐alveolar defects. rhBMP‐2/ACS (0.4 mg rhBMP‐2) was placed around the exposed dental implants. Additionally, one jaw quadrant in each animal was randomly assigned to receive the domeshaped macroporous ePTFE device. Mucoperiosteal flaps were advanced for primary wound closure. The animals were euthanized at 8 weeks post surgery for histometric analysis. Results: The space‐providing macroporous ePTFE device defined the volume and geometry of rhBMP‐2/ACS‐induced bone formation, whereas bone formation at sites receiving rhBMP‐2/ACS alone varied considerably. Vertical bone gain at turned dental implants averaged (SD) 4.7 ± 0.2 mm at sites receiving rhBMP‐2/ACS and the ePTFE device compared with 3.5 ± 0.9 mm at sites receiving rhBMP‐2/ACS only. The corresponding values for rhBMP‐2/ACS‐induced bone area were 9.6 ± 0.7 mm ² and 7.5 ± 6.2 mm ². There was a highly significant correlation between induced bone area and the space provided by the ePTFE device (p .001). There was no difference in induced bone density or bone‐implant contact between the two technologies. These observations were consistent with those observed at surface‐etched dental implants. Conclusions: The data from this study suggest that a space‐providing macroporous ePTFE device defines rhBMP‐2/ACS‐induced alveolar augmentation to provide adequate bone quantities for implant dentistry. The dental implant surface technology does not appear to substantially influence bone formation.     

The Effect of Smoking on Early Bone Remodeling on Surface Modified Southern Implants®

Introduction: Smoking affects the survival of turned titanium implants. Although smoking has less impact on the failure rate of rough surface implants, the effect on bone loss on rough surface implants has not been studied yet and may be an important factor in biological stability. Aim: To determine the effect of smoking on early implant failures and bone remodeling around moderately rough implants (Southern Implants®, Southern Implants, Irene, South Africa). Materials and Methods: Three hundred twenty‐nine patient records, containing information on 712 installed implants, were scrutinized retrospectively and periapical radiographs were analyzed for interproximal bone level. Mann‐Whitney U‐test and Fisher's exact test were performed to compare bone level and implant survival in smokers and nonsmokers. Only implants with at least 6 months of function time were analyzed for bone level changes. Results: The overall survival rate was 98.3%. Implants in smokers had a threefold higher failure rate compared with nonsmokers (5/104 = 4.8% vs 7/608 = 1.2%). This was statistically significant on implant level (p = .007) but not on patient level (1/41 vs 7/288, p = .997). Readable radiographs from 363 implants in 169 patients were available with a mean follow‐up of 12 months (SD 5.11; range 6–28). The mean interproximal bone level was 1.36 mm (n = 363; SD 0.41; range 0.48–3.70). Bone levels were independent of jaw location. Sixty implants from 21 smokers lost statistically significantly (p = .001) more bone (mean 1.56; SD 0.53; range 0.75–3.22) than the 303 implants in 148 nonsmokers (mean 1.32 mm; SD 0.38; range 0.48–3.7). The maxilla is especially prone to bone loss compared with the mandible (1.70 mm vs 1.26 mm, p < .001). Conclusion: The Southern Implants® system demonstrated a high absolute survival rate. Although smokers are not more prone to implant loss, more pronounced peri‐implant bone loss was observed, especially in the maxilla. Whether this affects future biological complications remains to be investigated in prospective long‐term studies.     

In-patient comparison of immediately loaded and non-loaded implants within 6 months

Abstract: According to the Brånemark protocol, a stress‐free healing period is one of the most emphasised requirements for implant integration. Recent studies have encouraged a progressive shortening of the healing period and immediate loading has been proposed for the edentulous mandible. This prospective study evaluated the clinical outcomes of 14 immediately loaded FRIALIT‐2^® implants compared with 28 non‐loaded controls in an in‐patient study. The results were based on clinical stability and on changes of bone level from implant placement to abutment connection 6 months after insertion. In the course of our investigation, seven patients with edentulous mandibles have been treated with 43 implants following an immediate‐loading protocol. Six FRIALIT‐2^® implants were placed in the interforaminal region located at positions 34, 33, 32, 42, 43, 44. Bone level in relation to implant margin was measured and recorded. In order to obtain an in‐patient comparison of immediately loaded and non‐loaded implants, the ones at 33 and 43 were chosen to be immediately loaded by a Dolder‐bar retained overdenture. The implants in position 32, 34, 42 and 44 were covered and left to heal. After a healing period of 6 months, second stage surgery was carried out. The clinical criteria to be checked at this point were survival, Periotest values and marginal bone level at the loaded and non‐loaded implants. The mean Periotest value was ?2.7 for the loaded and ?5.6 for the non‐loaded implants. The Mann–Whitney U‐test showed that the difference was highly significant (P < 0.001). The mean bone level changes at prosthetic delivery were 0.9 mm resorption for the loaded implants and 0.33 mm for non‐loaded implants. The difference was highly significant (P < 0.001). No implant failures were observed up to the prosthetic restoration 6 months post insertion. The results of this investigation allowed for direct comparison of implant survival and clinical results between immediately loaded implants and standard implants. Clinical bone changes at the 6‐month evaluation demonstrated significantly higher crestal resorption around loaded implants. This fact was confirmed by higher median Periotest values (?3 vs. ?6) of immediately loaded implants. According to the outcome of this study, immediate loading of two interforaminal implants with a Dolder‐bar resulted in an intimate bone apposition comparable with implants with submerged healing. Nevertheless, the coronal bone level as well as clinical stability (PTV) were significantly lower in the case of the immediately loaded implants. Future studies will be necessary to evaluate marginal bone resorption, Periotest values and clinical success rates of mandibular immediately loaded implants in the long‐term.     

Primary stability of a conical implant and a hybrid, cylindric screw-type implant in vitro

PURPOSE: The differences with respect to primary stability between 2 Camlog implants, a conical implant, and a hybrid cylindric screw-type implant, were investigated in vitro. The effect of underdimensioned implant bed preparation was also studied for both implant designs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In an in vitro model the stability of different implants in fresh porcine iliac bone blocks was measured using torque moment values, the Periotest, resonance frequency analysis, and push-out testing. Results: The conical implant showed significantly higher primary stability than the cylindric hybrid implant using the insertion torque, Periotest, and push-out tests. For both types of implants, the torque moment values following under-dimensioned preparation were significantly better than those obtained following the standard drilling protocol (Conical: 25.00 vs 11.00 Ncm; Cylindrical: 11.75 vs. 5.75 Ncm). For the cylindric implant, significantly better results following under-dimensioned implant bed preparation were observed only with the insertion torque and the pushout testing values. The mean ISQ values for all groups were between 55 and 57; no statistical differences with respect to ISQ could be found. CONCLUSION: In this in vitro model conical implants showed higher primary stability than cylindric implants. The procedure of under-dimensioned drilling seemed to increase primary stability for both types of implants; however, the effect was only observable using insertion torque. RFA and Periotest, the noninvasive, clinical methods tested, did not clearly demonstrate this difference.