Improvement in postoperative pain relief by the addition of midazolam to an intrathecal injection of buprenorphine and bupivacaine

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Intrathecal injections of the benzodiazepine midazolam have been reported to cause antinociception in animals and pain relief in human beings, including the potentiation of opioid analgesia. This study compared the efficacy of the addition of midazolam to a mixture of buprenorphine and bupivacaine used for spinal anaesthesia. METHODS: The study was prospective, randomized, and observer blinded. It involved 60 patients (30 per group), ASA I and II, age 20-40 yr, undergoing minor and intermediate lower abdominal surgery under spinal anaesthesia. Patients were randomized into two groups: the control group received a spinal injection of hyperbaric bupivacaine (15 mg) plus buprenorphine (0.15 mg) and the experimental group received a spinal injection of the same two drugs and doses but supplemented with intrathecal midazolam (2 mg). RESULTS: The duration of postoperative analgesia in the control group was 9.24 +/- 2.57 h (mean +/- SEM), and 21.33 +/- 12.69 h in the midazolam treated group (P < 0.001). Patients treated with intrathecal midazolam had better pain relief judged by visual analogue score on coughing (P = 0.0013) and a nursing mobility score (P < 0.0001). Adverse effects were minor and their incidence was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that intrathecal midazolam 2 mg improves the quality and duration of postoperative pain relief afforded by intrathecal buprenorphine and bupivacaine.     

The analgesic and sedative effects of intrathecal midazolam in perianal surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate the analgesic and sedative effects of intrathecal midazolam when added to spinal bupivacaine in patients undergoing perianal surgery under spinal anaesthesia. METHODS: Forty-four patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups: Group I (B) received hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% 2 mL + saline 0.9% 1 mL in a total volume of 3 mL intrathecally; Group II (BM) received hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% 2 mL + 1 mL of 2mg preservative-free midazolam in a total volume of 3 mL intrathecally. In both groups, the onset and recovery times of sensory block, the degree and recovery times of motor block as well as the sedation and visual analogue pain scores were recorded, and statistically compared. RESULTS: In Group BM, the postoperative visual analogue pain scores were significantly lower at the first 4 h (P < 0.05), the average time until the first dose of additional analgesic requirement was significantly longer (P < 0.05), and sedation scales were significantly higher (P < 0.05), compared to Group B. There were no statistically significant differences in the onset and the full recovery times of sensory and motor blocks in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The use of intrathecal midazolam combined with intrathecal bupivacaine produces a more effective and longer analgesia with a mild sedative effect in perianal surgery.     

Spinal ropivacaine or bupivacaine for cesarean delivery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was to compare clinical efficacy and safety of ropivacaine and bupivacaine given intrathecally in combination with morphine for cesarean delivery. METHODS: With ethical committee approval and a written informed consent, 60 women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to receive spinal anesthesia with either 20 mg ropivacaine plus 0.1 mg morphine (n = 30) or 15 mg bupivacaine plus 0.1 mg morphine (n = 30). Profile of spinal block (onset and recovery times), cardiovascular effects, and quality of postoperative analgesia (patient-controlled morphine) were recorded by a blinded observer. RESULTS: The onset time of motor block was shorter after bupivacaine (8 +/- 2 min) than after ropivacaine (12 +/- 5 minutes) (P <.05), whereas duration of both sensory and motor blocks was longer after bupivacaine (139 +/- 37 minutes and 254 +/- 76 minutes) than after ropivacaine (112 +/- 27 minutes and 211 +/- 48 minutes) (P <.01 and P <.05, respectively). No differences in intraoperative quality of anesthesia and clinical hypotension requiring ephedrine administration were observed between the two groups. Postoperative analgesia was similarly effective in both groups; however median consumption of patient-controlled morphine during the first 24 hours after surgery was higher in patients of group Ropivacaine (5 mg; range, 0 to 18 mg) than in patients of group Bupivacaine (2 mg; range, 0 to 7 mg) (P <.01). CONCLUSION: Spinal anesthesia produced with 20 mg ropivacaine plus 0.1 mg morphine is as effective and safe as that provided by 15 mg bupivacaine plus 0.1 mg morphine, with an earlier recovery of sensory and motor functions after surgery.     

Patient-controlled bupivacaine wound instillation following cesarean section: the lack of efficacy of adjuvant ketamine

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the analgesic efficacy of ketamine when administered as an adjuvant to bupivacaine for patient-controlled wound instillation following cesarean section. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: Large referral hospital. PATIENTS: 50 term parturients undergoing cesarean section. INTERVENTION: In all cases, a standard spinal anesthetic was administered. On completion of the surgery, a multihole 20 G epidural catheter (B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany) was placed above the fascia such that the tip was sited at the point which demarcated 50% of the length of the surgical wound. Thereafter, the catheter was connected to a patient-controlled drug delivery device. The device was filled with either 0.125% bupivacaine (bupivacaine group) or 0.125% bupivacaine and ketamine (1 mg/mL) (bupivacaine-ketamine group). Postoperatively, wound instillation was performed via the patient-controlled analgesia device. During the first 6 postoperative hours, a co-investigator administered "rescue" morphine (2 mg IV). Thereafter, "rescue" dipyrone (1 g) was administered on patient request. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At all time intervals, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at rest, on coughing, and during leg raise were similar between the groups. All patients (100%) in both treatment groups received "rescue" morphine. Similarly, the number of doses of 2 mg "rescue" morphine administered was unaffected by patient randomization. The total "rescue" morphine administered during the first 6 postoperative hours was 11.2 +/- 4.6 mg versus 11.3 +/- 5.6 mg for the bupivacaine group and bupivacaine-ketamine group, respectively. The number of pump infusions during the 24-hour study period was 9 +/- 2 and 9 +/- 3 for the bupivacaine group and bupivacaine-ketamine group, respectively. The volume infused via the delivery device was similar between the groups (81 +/- 18 mL vs. 85 +/- 24 mL for the bupivacaine group and bupivacaine-ketamine group, respectively). Psychomental and cognitive function as measured by the Digit Symbol Substitution and Mini Mental Tests were unaffected by adjuvant ketamine administration. Patient satisfaction was similar between the groups. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant local ketamine does not enhance bupivacaine-induced wound instillation following cesarean section.     

The influence of preemptive spinal anesthesia on postoperative pain

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of spinal anesthesia on postoperative pain and postoperative opioid requirements. DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. SETTING: Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel-a government hospital. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: 30 ASA physical status I and II unpremedicated women undergoing elective total abdominal hysterectomy were randomly allocated into two groups of 15 patients each using a sealed envelope technique. Patients in Group 1 were given a subarachnoid injection of 12 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine and after 10 minutes general anesthesia was induced. Patients in Group 2 received only general anesthesia. Anesthesia was induced with midazolam and maintained with oxygen, N2O, isoflurane, and pancuronium. No opioids were given intraoperatively. Postoperatively patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine was initiated in both groups (1 mg x mL(-1), bolus dose 1 mg, lockout interval 10 minutes, and background infusion 1 mg x mL(-1)) at patient first request for analgesic. Pain was assessed over 24 hours by cumulative morphine dose and visual analog score (VAS). Postoperative PCA morphine consumption at 2, 6, and 24 hours following patient first request for analgesic for Groups 1 and 2 were: 3.1 +/- 1 mg versus 7.2 +/- 3 mg (p = 0.04), 13.4 +/- 2 mg versus 17.2 +/- 4 mg (p = 0.03) and 35.9 +/- 8 mg versus 47.7 +/- 8 mg in Group 2 (p = 0.04). VAS scores at 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative neural blockade may reduce postoperative analgesic requirements.     

Preemptive analgesia with bupivacaine for segmental mastectomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Preemptive analgesia is the concept of providing analgesia before surgical incision, resulting in less postoperative pain. The purpose of this study is to determine if preemptive and/or postoperative local anesthetic infiltration of bupivacaine in patients undergoing segmental mastectomy results in less postoperative pain compared with patients receiving placebo. METHODS: In this prospective, double-blinded study, 120 patients were randomized into 4 groups: group 1, preincisional (10 mL) and postoperative (10 mL) wound infiltration of 0.5% bupivicaine, (+Pre+Post); group 2, preincisional bupivacaine (10 mL) and postoperative infiltration (10 mL) of placebo (normal saline solution), (+Pre-Post); group 3, preincisional placebo (10 mL) and postoperative bupivacaine (10 mL), (-Pre+Post); or group 4, preincisional (10 mL) and postoperative infiltration of placebo (10 mL), (-Pre-Post). All patients received a standardized laryngeal mask general anesthetic. Data were recorded at the following time intervals: preoperative admission, postanesthesia care unit (PACU) admission, PACU stay, stepdown-unit admission, stepdown-unit stay, hospital discharge, and 24 hours post operation. RESULTS: No difference was noted with respect to preoperative pain visual analog scale (VAS, 0-100 mm), surgical duration, PACU stay time, stepdown-unit stay time, incidence of postoperative nausea, or treatment for nausea in all measured time periods. The placebo group (group 4) had significantly higher mean pain VAS scores during the early postoperative period (PACU admission and PACU stay) compared to the other groups (PACU admission: group 1 = 2 +/- 8, group 2 = 4 +/- 11, group 3 = 3 +/- 15, group 4 = 17 +/- 21, P < .01; PACU stay: group 1 = 6 +/- 13, group 2 = 6 +/- 10, group 3 = 10 +/- 21, group 4 = 20 +/- 18, P < .01). Likewise, the number of patients who reported pain (pain frequency) was significantly higher in group 4 (placebo) compared with all other groups at PACU admission, PACU stay, stepdown-unit admission, and stepdown-unit stay (P < or = .01). CONCLUSION: Preincisional and/or postoperative wound bupivacaine infiltration lacks preemptive analgesic effects for segmental mastectomy.     

Brachial plexus block with midazolam and bupivacaine improves analgesia

PURPOSE: Adjuncts to local anesthetics for brachial plexus block may enhance the quality and duration of analgesia. Midazolam, a water-soluble benzodiazepine, is known to produce antinociception and enhance the effect of local anesthetics when given epidurally or intrathecally. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of midazolam added to brachial plexus anesthesia. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double blind study was conducted on 40 ASA I or II adult patients undergoing upper limb surgeries under supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in Group B (n = 20) were administered 30 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine and Group BM (n = 20) were given 30 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with midazolam 50 microg x kg(-1). Hemodynamic variables (i.e., heart rate, noninvasive blood pressure), pain scores and rescue analgesic requirements were recorded for 24 hr postoperatively. RESULTS: The onset of sensory and motor block was significantly faster in Group BM compared to Group B (P < 0.05). Pain scores were significantly higher in Group B compared to Group BM from two hours to 24 hr postoperatively (P < 0.05). Rescue analgesic requirements were significantly less in Group BM compared to Group B (P < 0.05). Hemodynamics and sedation scores did not differ between groups in the post-operative period. CONCLUSION: Midazolam (50 microg x kg(-1)) in combination with 30 mL of bupivacaine (0.5%) hastened onset of sensory and motor block, and improved postoperative analgesia when used in brachial plexus block, without producing any adverse events.     

Intrathecal versus intravenous fentanyl for supplementation of subarachnoid block during cesarean delivery

Forty-eight healthy parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery were randomly allocated to receive intrathecally either 12 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 12.5 microg of fentanyl (n = 23) or bupivacaine alone (n = 25). In the latter group, IV 12.5 microg of fentanyl was administered immediately after spinal anesthesia. We compared the amount of IV fentanyl required for supplementation of the spinal anesthesia during surgery, the intraoperative visual analog scale, the time to the first request for postoperative analgesia, and the incidence of adverse effects. Additional IV fentanyl supplementation amounting to a mean of 32 +/- 35 microg was required in the IV Fentanyl group, whereas no supple- mentation was required in the Intrathecal Fentanyl group (P = 0.009). The time to the first request for postoperative analgesia was significantly longer in the Intrathecal Fentanyl group than in the IV Fentanyl group (159 +/- 39 min versus 119 +/- 44 min; P = 0.003). The incidence of systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg and the ephedrine requirements were significantly higher in the IV Fentanyl group as compared with the Intrathecal Fentanyl group (P = 0.01). Also, intraoperative nausea and vomiting occurred less frequently in the Intrathecal Fentanyl group compared with the IV Fentanyl group (8 of 23 vs 17 of 25; P = 0.02). IMPLICATIONS: Supplementation of spinal bupivacaine anesthesia for cesarean delivery with intrathecal fentanyl provides a better quality of anesthesia and is associated with a decreased incidence of side effects as compared with supplementation with the same dose of IV fentanyl.     

Intraoperative bupivacaine during outpatient hernia repair in children: a randomized double blind trial

Postoperative pain is a major problem following surgery in the ambulatory child. A study was undertaken to test the effect of intraoperative bupivacaine on postoperative pain in children undergoing outpatient hernia repair. Ninety-nine children aged 1 to 7 years underwent outpatient inguinal herniorrhaphy under general anesthesia. Each was randomly assigned to receive bupivacaine (group 1) or saline (group 2), infiltrating the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves. Drug administration and patient evaluation were double-blinded. The groups were similar with respect to age, sex, side of procedure, and length of operation. In the immediate postoperative period, 17 group 1 patients required analgesics compared with 39 in group 2 (P less than .01); total codeine dosage was lower in group 1 (4.0 +/- 7.1 mg v 11.8 +/- 10.5 mg, P less than .05). Activity level 45 minutes after surgery (using a standardized scale) was greater in group 1 (P less than .05). Acetaminophen requirements at home were lower in group 1 on the day of surgery (3.1 +/- 4.3 mL v 5.7 +/- 7.4 mL, P less than .05) and over the following 48 hours (1.5 +/- 3.4 mL v 4.9 +/- 10.7 mL, P less than .05). Activity level at home on the day of surgery did not differ significantly between groups, but activity level over the following 48 hours was higher in group 1 (P less than .05). The two groups were similar with respect to all other parameters. We conclude that intraoperative bupivacaine decreases post-operative pain and analgesic use, and promotes early ambulation in children undergoing hernia repair.     

Postoperative pain relief following intrathecal bupivacaine combined with intrathecal or oral clonidine

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the postoperative analgesic and adverse effects of equal doses of oral or intrathecal clonidine in spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine plain. METHODS: Forty-five ASA I-III orthopaedic patients scheduled for osteosynthesis of a traumatic femur fracture were randomised in a double-blind fashion to one of 3 groups. Patients received 15 mg of plain bupivacaine intrathecally (group B) or an intrathecal mixture of bupivacaine 15 mg and clonidine 150 mg (group CIT). In group CPO oral clonidine 150 mg was administered 60 min before intrathecal injection of bupivacaine 15 mg. RESULTS: Oral and intrathecal clonidine prolonged the time until the first request for analgesics, 313 +/- 29 and 337 +/- 29 min, respectively, vs. 236 +/- 27 min in group B (P < 0.01). The total 24- h PCA morphine dose was significantly lower in group CIT(19.3 +/- 1.3 mg) compared to groups B and CPO(33.4 +/- 2.0 and 31.2 +/- 3.1 mg). MAP was decreased significantly during the first hour after intrathecal clonidine(14%) and during the first 5 h after oral clonidine(14-19%). HR decreased in CIT during the 5th and 6th postoperative hours(7-9%) and during the first 2 h(9%) in CPO (P < 0.01). The degree of sedation was more pronounced in group CPO during the first 3 h. Four patients had pruritus in group B. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of intrathecal clonidine prolonged analgesia and decreased morphine consumption postoperatively more than oral clonidine. Hypotension was more pronounced after oral than after intrathecal clonidine. Intrathecal clonidine is therefore recommended.     

Postcesarean analgesia: the efficacy of bupivacaine wound instillation with and without supplemental diclofenac

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the analgesic efficacy of diclofenac when administered as an adjuvant to bupivacaine wound instillation. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Large referral hospital. PATIENTS: 90 women recovering from cesarean delivery performed via a Pfannenstiel incision. INTERVENTIONS: A standard intrathecal anesthetic was administered. On completion of surgery, a multiorifice 20-gauge epidural catheter was placed within the surgical wound. Postoperatively, the catheter was attached to a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device programmed to deliver 9 mL with a 60-minute lockout time and no basal infusion. In group bupivacaine-diclofenac, the PCA device delivered 0.25% bupivacaine, and 20 minutes before the end of surgery, patients received intravenous diclofenac (75 mg/100 mL saline). Thereafter, oral diclofenac (50 mg) was administered every 8 hours. In group bupivacaine-placebo, 0.25% bupivacaine and an equal volume of intravenous saline or oral placebo were administered 20 minutes before the end of surgery and every 8 hours thereafter. In group placebo-diclofenac, wound instillation was with sterile water, and 20 minutes before the end of surgery, patients received intravenous diclofenac (75 mg/100 mL saline) and thereafter oral diclofenac (50 mg) at 8-hour intervals. During the first 6 postoperative hours, a coinvestigator administered "rescue" morphine (2 mg, intravenously). Thereafter, subcutaneous morphine (0.05 mg/kg) was administered on patient request for additional analgesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The number of attempts to activate the PCA device was significantly higher in group bupivacaine-placebo (39 +/- 32) when compared with group bupivacaine-diclofenac (24 +/- 28). During the first 6 postoperative hours, the number of patients requiring rescue morphine and the total rescue morphine administered were significantly different between the groups. During the subsequent 18 hours, subcutaneous morphine administration was significantly higher in group bupivacaine-placebo. Postoperative pain scores were significantly higher in group bupivacaine-placebo when compared with those recorded in groups placebo-diclofenac and bupivacaine-diclofenac. Finally, patient satisfaction was significantly lower in group bupivacaine-placebo. CONCLUSION: In the context of this study, the bupivacaine wound instillation with adjuvant diclofenac administration is associated with similar postoperative analgesia to that induced by diclofenac alone.     

Clinical properties of levobupivacaine or racemic bupivacaine for sciatic nerve block

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the intraoperative and postoperative clinical properties of the sciatic nerve block performed with either 0.5% bupivacaine or 0.5% levobupivacaine for orthopedic foot procedures. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: Inpatient unit of a university-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: 30 ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing elective hallux valgus repair under regional anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: After administering intravenous (IV) midazolam premedication (0.05 mg/kg), a femoral nerve block was performed with 15 mL of mepivacaine 2%. Patients were then randomly allocated to receive, in a double-blind fashion, a sciatic nerve block with 20 mL of either 0.5% bupivacaine (n = 15) or 0.5% levobupivacaine (n = 15). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: An observer who was blinded to the study drug recorded the onset time, quality, and duration of the sciatic nerve block. Postoperative analgesia consisted of 100 mg IV ketoprofen every 8 hours, with the first administration given at the patient's request. Mean (+/-SEM) onset time of the sciatic nerve block was 35 +/- 5 minutes for bupivacaine and 31 +/- 6 minutes for levobupivacaine (p = not significant [NS]). The duration of motor and sensory blocks with bupivacaine was 761 +/- 112 minutes and 790 +/- 110 minutes, respectively, and 716 +/- 80 minutes and 814 +/- 73 minutes, respectively, with levobupivacaine (p = NS). The first pain medication was requested after 844 +/- 96 minutes with bupivacaine and 872 +/- 75 minutes after levobupivacaine (p = NS). No differences in the quality of nerve block and patient satisfaction were reported between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: A dose of 20 mL of 0.5% levobupivacaine induces sciatic nerve block of similar onset, duration, and intensity as the block produced by the same volume and concentration of the racemic solution of bupivacaine.     

Epinephrine is not a useful addition to intrathecal fentanyl or fentanyl-bupivacaine for labor analgesia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Intrathecal fentanyl provides effective labor analgesia for a limited time with frequent side effects. We evaluated the effects of adding epinephrine to intrathecal fentanyl with and without bupivacaine. METHODS: Eighty healthy, term, nulliparous parturients with cervical dilation of 5 cm or less received combined spinal-epidural (CSE) analgesia. Subjects were randomized in a double-blind fashion to 1 of 4 intrathecal solutions containing fentanyl 35 microg with either saline (F); bupivacaine 2.5 mg + saline (FB); bupivacaine 2.5 mg + epinephrine 100 microg (FBE); or epinephrine 100 microg + saline (FE). Patients were evaluated for visual analog pain score, duration of spinal analgesia (time until patient request for additional analgesia), nausea/vomiting, pruritus, sensory and motor block, maternal blood pressure, and fetal heart rate (FHR). RESULTS: Intrathecal bupivacaine significantly prolonged fentanyl analgesia with or without epinephrine (P =.018), but epinephrine did not significantly prolong the duration of fentanyl alone or with bupivacaine (F, 92 +/- 39 minutes; FB, 125 +/- 31 minutes; FBE, 134 +/- 42 minutes; and FE, 117 +/- 48 minutes). Intrathecal epinephrine was associated with a higher incidence of severe nausea (P =.001), and the FBE group had more lower extremity weakness (P =.047). There was no difference in the incidence of severe pruritus, FHR deceleration, or delivery outcome between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that intrathecal epinephrine does not prolong the duration of fentanyl or fentanyl with bupivacaine for labor analgesia in nulliparous parturients. Additionally, intrathecal epinephrine did not decrease the incidence of side effects and therefore cannot be recommended.     

Effects of intrathecal midazolam on postoperative analgesia when added to a bupivacaine-clonidine mixture

BACKGROUND: Previous clinical and experimental studies have shown that a midazolam-clonidine mixture has a synergistic antinociceptive effect. This study evaluated the postoperative analgesic effect of adding midazolam to an intrathecal bupivacaine-clonidine mixture. METHODS: One hundred ten patients scheduled to undergo elective lower-extremity surgery were enrolled in this double-blind, randomized trial. Spinal anesthesia was administered by using 1 of 2 mixtures. Group B-C received 12.5 mg isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine, 30 mug clonidine, and 0.4 mL 0.9% saline. Group B-C-M received the B-C mixture plus 2 mg of midazolam in a 0.4-mL solution. Motor and sensory block levels were assessed before, during, and after the procedure until regression of the block to S2. Sedation levels were determined before anesthesia, during surgery, and at the end of the procedure. Postoperative analgesia was assessed every 15 minutes by using a visual analog scale. Duration of sensory and motor blocks was determined based on a modified Bromage scale, and time of the first pain relief request was noted. RESULTS: Duration of sensory block, time of first postoperative analgesic request, and amount of postoperative morphine administered were comparable between groups. However, the motor blockade lasted significantly longer in the B-C-M group compared with the B-C group (287 +/- 73 minutes vs 257 +/- 72 minutes, respectively; P < .05). CONCLUSION: Addition of midazolam to an intrathecal B-C mixture does not potentiate postoperative analgesia but prolongs the motor blockade.     

Effects of epidural injection on spinal block during combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Epidural injection has been known to enhance spinal anesthesia in combined spinal and epidural (CSE) anesthesia. Saline and local anesthetics have been reported to have a volume effect, elevating sensory level when supplementing a volume into the epidural space. We evaluated the effects of epidural injection when using the CSE technique for cesarean delivery. METHODS: Sixty-six parturients were allocated randomly into group C (control, n = 21), S (saline, n = 21), or B (bupivacaine, n = 24): epidural injections of 10 mL saline and 0.25% bupivacaine were given in groups S and B, respectively, 10 minutes after they received 8 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine intrathecally, and no injection was given in group C. The sensory level at 10 minutes, the maximal level and the time to reach it, and degree of motor block and muscle relaxation were compared. We also investigated intraoperative side effects and postoperative findings in the postanesthesia care unit. RESULTS: Epidural injection raised the sensory level significantly in groups S and B, but the maximal height of sensory block and degree of muscle relaxation did not differ among the groups. Fewer patients complained of intraoperative pain in group B than in the other groups (P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: We could not achieve satisfactory surgical analgesia with 8 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine injected into the subarachnoid space using the needle-through-needle technique in cesarean deliveries. An epidural saline injection elevated the sensory level, which did not improve the spinal block, whereas an epidural injection of 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine enhanced the spinal block and sustained the block postoperatively.     

Intrathecal fentanyl added to hyperbaric ropivacaine for cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hyperbaric ropivacaine produces adequate spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Addition of opioid to local anesthetics improves spinal anesthesia. We assessed the effect of fentanyl added to hyperbaric ropivacaine for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. METHODS: Fifty-nine healthy, full-term parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to receive either fentanyl 10 micro g or normal saline 0.2 mL added to 0.5% hyperbaric ropivacaine 18 mg. Characteristics of spinal block, intraoperative quality of spinal anesthesia, side effects, complete analgesia (time to first feeling of pain), and effective analgesia (time to first request of analgesics) were assessed. RESULTS: Duration of sensory block was prolonged in the fentanyl group (P <.05). Duration of motor block was similar in both groups. The quality of intraoperative analgesia was better in the fentanyl group (P <.05). Incidence of side effects did not differ between groups. Duration of complete analgesia (143.2 +/- 34.2 minutes v 101.4 +/- 21.4 minutes; P <.001) and effective analgesia (207.2 +/- 32.2 minutes v 136.3 +/- 14.1 minutes; P <.001) were prolonged in the fentanyl group. CONCLUSIONS: Adding fentanyl 10 micro g to hyperbaric ropivacaine 18 mg for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery improves intraoperative anesthesia and increases the analgesia in the early postoperative period.     

Combined intrathecal morphine and bupivacaine for cesarean section

The effects of adding 0.2 mg preservative-free morphine sulfate in 0.2 ml solution to hyperbaric spinal bupivacaine were evaluated in a double-blind randomized prospective study of 34 patients undergoing elective repeat cesarean section. In the control patients (n = 17), 0.2 ml saline instead of morphine was added to bupivacaine. The intrathecal morphine significantly improved intra- and postoperative analgesia, e.g., 82% of patients given morphine compared with 41% of the control patients did not require analgesic supplementation to the spinal anesthesia during surgery; postoperatively, the former patients did not request additional analgesia for 27 +/- 0.7 hours (mean +/- SEM) compared with 2 +/- 0.3 hours in the control patients. Neonatal condition was not adversely affected by this small dose of morphine administered 11 +/- 1 minutes before delivery. Combining 0.2 mg morphine with hyperbaric spinal bupivacaine for cesarean section is a safe and effective method of improving intraoperative pain relief and providing adequate prolonged postoperative analgesia.     

Comparison of fentanyl-bupivacaine or midazolam-bupivacaine mixtures with plain bupivacaine for caudal anaesthesia in children

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the intensity and effectiveness of 0.75 ml.kg-1 bupivacaine 0.25% with the addition of fentanyl or midazolam for caudal block in children undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy. METHODS: Seventy-five children were allocated randomly to three groups to receive a caudal block with either 0.25% bupivacaine with fentanyl 1 microg.kg(-1) (group BF) or with midazolam 50 microg.kg(-1) (group BM) or bupivacaine alone (group B) after induction of anaesthesia. Haemodynamic parameters, degree of pain, additional analgesic requirements and side-effects were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean systolic arterial pressure at 10, 20, 30 min after caudal block was higher in group B compared with groups BF and BM. Mean intraoperative heart rate was lower in group BF than the other groups. Adequate analgesia was obtained in all patients (100%) in group BF, 23 patients (92%) in group BM and 21 patients (84%) in group B (P > 0.05). The time to recovery to an Aldrete score of 10 was significantly shorter in group B than group BM (P < 0.05). Although not significant, it was also shorter in group B than group BF. There was no difference in additional analgesic requirements between the groups in the first 24 h. Sedation score was higher in the midazolam group at 60 and 90 min postoperatively than the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Caudal block with 0.75 ml.kg(-1) 0.25% bupivacaine and 50 microg.kg(-1) midazolam or 1 microg.kg(-1) fentanyl provides no further analgesic advantages to bupivacaine alone when administered immediately after induction of anaesthesia in children undergoing unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy.     

Effects of intrapleural analgesia on pulmonary function and postoperative pain in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery

OBJECTIVE: Pain after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery remains a significant problem and may cause serious complications because of restricted breathing and limited early mobilization. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of intrapleural analgesia on the relief of postoperative pain in patients undergoing CABG surgery. DESIGN: Postoperative pain, pulmonary function tests, and outcomes were compared with a placebo group after CABG surgery in a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Settings: Cardiovascular surgery clinic. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty-five patients with decreased lung function were studied. INTERVENTIONS: Group A (62 patients) received 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine bilaterally in the intrapleural spaces every 6 hours for 4 days, and group B (63 placebo patients) received sterile saline solution. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Group A had a significantly shorter extubation time than the placebo group (8 +/- 1 h v 10 +/- 4 hours, p < 0.001). Blood gas analysis showed higher PaO2 and lower PaCO2 levels in group A. The patients receiving bupivicaine had significantly higher FEV1, FCV, VC, MVV, PEF, and FEF 25-75% values postoperatively when compared with the placebo group. Postoperative analgesic requirements and visual analog pain scales were significantly lower in group A. The intensive care unit stay in group A was shorter (1.2 +/- 0.7 v 1.4 +/- 0.6 days, p = 0.04); however, the hospital stay did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in lung function parameters correlating with decreased postoperative pain with intrapleural bupivacaine was observed. Intrapleural analgesia provided a good level of analgesia, improved respiratory performance, and allowed rapid mobilization, which led to a reduction of postoperative respiratory complications.     

Intraperitoneal application of bupivacaine plus morphine for pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Intraperitoneal administration of a local anaesthetic in combination with an opioid, for the relief of postoperative pain, has already been reported except after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study was aimed at assessing the analgesic effect of the intraperitoneal administration of bupivacaine and morphine in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: At the end of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, in a double-blind, randomized manner, one of the following injections was given intraperitoneally. There were 30 patients in each group: Group 1, physiological saline 30 mL; Group 2, bupivacaine 0.25% 30 mL; Group 3, bupivacaine 0.25% 30 mL plus morphine 2 mg. In addition, Group 2 received 2 mg intravenous (i.v.) morphine in 2 mL saline, and Groups 1 and 3, 2 mL saline intravenously. Patients' postoperative pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale and a verbal rating score. The postoperative analgesic requirement was assessed by the total dose of metamizol administered by an i.v. patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. Pain, vital signs, supplemental analgesic consumption and side-effects were recorded for all patients for 24 h. RESULTS: There were no differences between the three groups regarding pain scores (at rest and coughing) during the study except in the first 2 h, when scores were lower for patients receiving intraperitoneal bupivacaine plus i.v. morphine (P < 0.05). Supplemental consumption of metamizol was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in Group 3 than in Group 1 during the first 6 h after surgery. However, the cumulative doses of metamizol were also lower in Group 2 than in Groups 1 and 3 over the entire study (2025 +/- 1044 mg vs. 4925 +/- 1238 and 4125 +/- 1276mg; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the intraperitoneal administration of morphine plus bupivacaine 0.25% reduced the analgesic requirements during the first 6 postoperative hours compared with the control group. However, the combination of intraperitoneal bupivacaine 0.25% and i.v. morphine was more effective for treatment of pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.