Dosimetry modeling for focal high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy

PurposeThe dosimetry of focal high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy was assessed. Dose volume histogram parameters, robustness to source position errors, and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were compared for whole-gland (WG), hemi-gland (HEMI), and ultra-focal (UF) treatment plans.Methods and MaterialsTumor volumes were delineated based on MRI and template biopsy results for 9 patients. WG, HEMI, and UF plans were produced assuming 19 Gy single fraction monotherapy treatments. For UF plans, a 6-mm margin was applied to the visible tumor to create a focal-planning target volume (F-PTV). Systematic source position shifts of 1–4 mm were applied to assess plan robustness. The dosimetric impact of steel catheters was assessed using MC simulation.ResultsMean D₉₀ and V₁₀₀ were 20.4 Gy and 97.9% for prostate in WG plans, 22.2 Gy and 98.1% for hemi-prostate in HEMI plans, and 23.0 Gy and 98.2% for F-PTV in UF plans. Mean urethra D₁₀ was 20.3, 19.7, and 9.2 Gy in WG, HEMI, and UF plans, respectively. Mean rectal D_2cc was 12.5, 9.8, and 4.6 Gy in WG, HEMI, and UF plans, respectively. Focal treatment plans were sensitive to source position errors—2 mm systematic shifts reduced mean prostate D₉₀ by 0.7%, hemi-prostate D₉₀ by 2.6%, and F-PTV D₉₀ by 8.3% in WG, HEMI, and UF plans, respectively. MC simulation results were similar for all plan types with most dose volume histogram parameters reduced by <2%.ConclusionsHEMI and UF treatments can achieve higher D₉₀ values compared with WG treatments with reduced organ at risk dose. Focal treatments are more sensitive to systematic source position errors than WG treatments.     

Interobserver variability in rectum contouring in high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: A multi-institutional prospective analysis

PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the interobserver variability (IOV) of rectum contouring, and its dosimetric consequences, for high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with prostate cancer across multiple institutions.Methods and MaterialsFive radiation oncologists contoured rectums in 10 patients on transperineal ultrasound image sets after establishing a delineation consensus. The D_0.1cc, D_1cc, and D_2cc rectum volume parameters were determined. The mean, standard deviation, and range of each dose–volume histogram parameter were evaluated for each patient. The IOV was determined using the coefficient of variation, and the dosimetric impacts on the total dose were analyzed by estimating the biologically equivalent dose (EQD_{2α/β = 3}).ResultsThe interobserver coefficients of variation (±standard deviation) for the reported D_0.1cc, D_1cc, and D_2cc were 5 ± 1.84%, 4 ± 1.26%, and 4 ± 1.33%, respectively. As for the impact on the total dose, the mean dose differences for D_0.1cc, D_1cc, and D_2cc were 10 Gy, 7.3 Gy, and 6.6 Gy, respectively.ConclusionsThe D_2cc is robust as evident by the low IOV (<5%). However, some variability ranges almost overlap with the clinical threshold level, which may present dosimetric and clinical complications. General rectal contouring guidelines for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy are desirable to reduce discrepancies in delineation.     

A comparative analysis of overall survival between high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate brachytherapy boosts for unfavorable-risk prostate cancer

Purpose

External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy boost has been associated with improved biochemical progression–free survival and overall survival (OS) compared with dose-escalated EBRT (DE-EBRT) alone for unfavorable-risk prostate cancer. However, it is not known whether high-dose-rate (HDR) boost provides a similar benefit. We compare HDR boost against LDR boost and DE-EBRT with respect to OS.

Template-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in gynecologic cancers: A single institutional experience

PurposeTo report the outcome and toxicities of radical external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and template-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) in patients diagnosed with cervical cancer undergoing inadvertent surgery, vault cancers, and vaginal cancers at our institution.Methods and MaterialsBetween January 2000 and December 2008, 113 patients (37 patients of cervical cancer post-inadvertent surgery, 57 patients with vault cancers, and 19 patients with primary vaginal cancers) were treated with Martinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template brachytherapy boost after EBRT. The median EBRT dose was 50 Gy, median ISBT dose was 20 Gy, whereas median total dose was 73 Gy equivalent dose at 2 Gy per fraction in all three groups.ResultsMedian followup of surviving patients for the whole group was 43 months (interquartile range, 19–67 months). The 3-year actuarial disease-free survival and overall survival for three groups was 61%, 61%, 59% and 64%, 64%, and 56%, respectively. Grade III/IV rectal toxicity was seen in 11 (10%) patients, bladder toxicity in 5 (4.5%) patients, whereas 7 (6%) patients developed Grade III small bowel toxicity. Residual disease at brachytherapy had significant impact on DFS and OS. Other factors such as age, disease volume, parametrial extension, and vaginal extension did not impact the survivals.ConclusionsMartinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template–based high-dose-rate ISBT boost in gynecologic cancer results in a reasonable outcome in terms of survivals with acceptable late toxicities. The use of template-based ISBT is associated with a definite learning curve.     

Comparative study of dosimetry between high-dose-rate and permanent prostate implant brachytherapies in patients with prostate adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE: To compare the dose coverage, conformity, and homogeneity between high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy and permanent prostate implant (PPI) in the treatment of prostate adenocarcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From January 2003 to August 2004, 54 patients (108 implants) underwent HDR brachytherapy of prostate cancer with iridium-192 stepping source. Of patients who underwent PPI brachytherapy with iodine-125, 72 patients were randomly selected for the purpose of dosimetric comparison. PPI preplan was done based on transrectal ultrasound study, and postplan was done using CT 1 month after implant. Dosimetric parameters of HDR were compared to that of PPI preplan and postplan. RESULTS: HDR brachytherapy had lower D90 (111.5% vs. 120.2%), lower V100 (97.2% vs. 99.6%), lower natural dose ratio (1.03 vs. 1.13), higher conformal index (0.69 vs. 0.62), and higher homogeneity index (0.63 vs. 0.52) than PPI preplan (all p < 0.0001). All the dosimetric parameters of PPI postplan including D90 (86.7%), V100 (82.0%), natural dose ratio (0.92), conformal index (0.53), and homogeneity index (0.42) were inferior to HDR brachytherapy (all p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: HDR brachytherapy of the prostate can provide better dose coverage, conformity, and homogeneity compared to PPI.     

Individualized 3D-printed templates for high-dose-rate interstitial multicathether brachytherapy in patients with breast cancer

Purpose

High-dose-rate, multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy is technically complex and operator-dependent, requiring lengthy training and specialized skills. Furthermore, until the advent of contouring on computerized tomography (CT) images, difficulties existed in locating the target volume precisely. The present article reports the results of a study that aimed at producing and validating a 3D-printed template to aid in target volume localization for multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy in patients with breast cancer.

Rectum dose reduction and individual treatment plan optimization for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE: Different doses and techniques used in high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy make it difficult to define universal quality parameters. The aim of this study was to develop individual, objective parameters for the evaluation of an HDR brachytherapy plan for prostate radiation. METHODS: Fifty-three patients who received an HDR brachytherapy boost after external radiation were analyzed in this study. Brachytherapy was performed with a (192)Ir source after ultrasound-guided, transperineal metal needle application followed by removal of the ultrasound probe to reduce organ dose levels at the anterior rectum wall. The rectum and prostate locations as well as the dose at the anterior rectum wall were estimated under the anatomical conditions of HDR prostate brachytherapy. The doses at the organs at risk (rectum and urethra) were analyzed for several parameters, which were compared to values of former patients before the start of treatment. In cases of major deviations, modifications of the treatment plan were performed before starting the treatment. RESULTS: Deflating of the water balloon led to an increase of the space between the anterior rectal wall and the dorsal margin of the prostate (mean, 6mm; 1-10mm). The dose of the introduced "virtual rectum," represented by the ventral surface of the ultrasound probe, in the treatment plan correlated to dose measurements in the rectum. Pretreatment evaluation and comparison of the established individual quality parameters led in two cases to a treatment plan modification. CONCLUSIONS: This method allows a fast and objective individual brachytherapy treatment plan evaluation and improvement.     

Comparison of dose-escalated,image-guided radiotherapy vs. dose-escalated,high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost in a modern cohort of intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients

PurposeWe compared outcomes in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with dose-escalated adaptive image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) or dose-escalated high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost (HDR-B).Methods and MaterialsPatients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer by National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria were treated with either CT-based off-line adaptive IGRT (n = 734) or HDR-B (n = 282). IGRT was delivered with 3D-conformal or intensity-modulated radiation therapy with a median dose of 77.4 Gy. For HDR-B, the whole pelvis received a median 46 Gy, and the prostate 2 implants of 9.5 Gy (n = 71), 10.5 Gy (n = 155), or 11.5 Gy (n = 56).ResultsMedian followup was 3.7 years for IGRT and 8.0 years for HDR-B (p < 0.001). Eight-year biochemical control was 86% for IGRT and 91% for HDR-B (p = 0.22), disease-free survival 67% for IGRT and 79% for HDR-B (p = 0.006), and overall survival 75% for IGRT and 86% for HDR-B (p = 0.009). Cause-specific survival (8-year, 100% vs. 99%), freedom from distant metastases (98% vs. 97%), and freedom from local recurrence (98% vs. 98%) did not differ (p > 0.50 each). A worse prognosis group was defined by percent positive prostate biopsy cores >50%, perineural invasion, or stage T2b–c, encompassing 260 (35%) IGRT and 171 (61%) HDR-B patients. These patients evidenced a 5-year biochemical control of 96% for HDR-B and 87% for IGRT (p = 0.002).ConclusionsDose-escalated IGRT and HDR-B both yield excellent clinical outcomes for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Improved biochemical control with HDR-B for patients with worse pretreatment characteristics suggests that a subgroup of intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients may benefit from dual-modality treatment.     

Complications and side effects of high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy

PurposeTo describe technical challenges and complications encountered during and after high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and review management of these complications.Methods and MaterialsThe authors performed a systematic review of the literature on toxicities encountered after prostate HDR-BT +/− external beam radiotherapy. A total of 397 studies were identified, of which 64 were included. A focused review of literature regarding the management of acute and late toxicities also performed.ResultsMost acute toxicities include grade 0–2 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity. Overall, Grade 3+ Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events toxicity after HDR-BT was low [genitourinary: 0–1%; gastrointestinal 0–3%]. Rates of fistula formation were <1%, and radiation cystitis/proctitis were <14% and more commonly reported in cohorts treated with HDR-BT boost and external beam radiotherapy.ConclusionsHDR-BT both as monotherapy or combined with external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer is well tolerated. Serious complications are rare.     

Improved survival for patients with prostate cancer receiving high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost to EBRT compared with EBRT alone

PurposeHigh-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost is a treatment of intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer, but long-term clinical outcome data are sparse. We report long-term survival and toxicity data in a cohort of patients treated in a single institution.MethodsBetween 1998 and 2004, 654 patients with localized prostate cancer received either 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (median 46 Gy) with an HDR (median 18 Gy in three fractions) boost (“3-D conformal radiotherapy [3DCRT] + HDR”; 215 patients) or 3DCRT alone (“3DCRT”; median 70 Gy; 439 patients) with curative intent. Men with National Comprehensive Cancer Network intermediate risk were offered neoadjuvant androgen deprivation and with high risk were also offered adjuvant androgen deprivation. Data collection included patient-reported outcome measures.ResultsThe 3DCRT + HDR group was older (72.3 vs. 68.9 yrs), had higher presenting PSAs (iPSA) (15.66 and 12.57 ng/mL, respectively), higher proportion of Gleason scores >7 (15.3% vs. 12.4%), and higher proportions of extracapsular disease (29.3% vs. 25.5%). 3DCRT + HDR men had lower proportions of low-risk patients (3.3% vs. 19.4%) and higher proportions of high-risk patients (50.7% vs. 37.4%) than the 3DCRT group. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year overall survival was superior at 92%, 81%, and 67%, respectively, for the 3DCRT + HDR group, compared with 88%, 71%, and 53%, respectively, in the 3DCRT group (p < 0.001). The 5-, 10-, and 15-year cause specific survival also favored the HDR boost group with survival of 96%, 93%, and 87% (3DCRT + HDR) and 95% 88% and 79% (3DCRT), respectively (p < 0.037).ConclusionsHDR brachytherapy boost in conjunction with 3DCRT offered superior overall survival and cause-specific survival in our patient population.     

Interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of keloids: Moving toward a volumetric approach

PurposeBrachytherapy (BT) after surgical resection of keloids reduces the risk of local recurrence, but standardization of dose/technique is lacking. Typical keloid BT treatment utilizes a single-channel source prescribed to 5-mm depth. We investigated the dosimetry of a volume-based target definition for interstitial high-dose-rate BT treatment of keloids.Methods and MaterialsWe retrospectively identified consecutive 14 patients who had a total of 20 keloids treated with interstitial high-dose-rate BT for keloids at our institution between 2004 and 2014. Keloids were treated with a single 8 Gy fraction prescribed to 5 mm beneath the scar within 36 h of surgery. Retrospectively, a 3-mm skin high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) was contoured under the scar for volume-based dose calculations.ResultsMean (SD) HR-CTV was 3.91 cm³ (3.1) and mean (SD) HR-CTV dose was 11.3 Gy (3.6). Mean D₉₀ (SD) was 62.9% (25.8) and mean V₁₀₀ (SD) was 56.5% (26.4). The mean V₁₅₀ (SD), V₂₀₀ (SD), and V₃₀₀ (SD) were as follows: 37.6% (19.9), 25.1% (14.4), and 11.3% (6.5), respectively. No local failures were reported at 9 months median followup. There were no Grade 2 or higher late toxicities.ConclusionsUsing a volume-based target definition, a wide range of target coverage was observed. This is likely a consequence of the curvature of the skin and the challenges of keeping the catheter equidistant from the skin across the target. Additional data are needed to define the potential clinical impact on outcomes/toxicities of dosimetric correlates with single-catheter BT keloid treatment.     

High-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized penile cancer: Evolution of a technique

PurposeHigh-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy is a convenient treatment option for selected patients with T1-T2 penile squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), providing high rates of penile preservation and tumor control. We present the results of penile SCC treated with HDR brachytherapy either interstitially or via a surface mold.Methods and MaterialsBetween November 2009 and April 2019, seven patients (2 T1a and 5 T2) were treated with interstitial HDR and 8 (1 Tis, six T1a, and one T1b) with surface mold. Prescribed dose for interstitial patients ranged from 38.4 Gy in 6 days (3.2 Gy × 12) to 53 Gy in 9 days (3.12 × 17), BID. All patients treated with mold brachytherapy received 40 Gy in 10 fractions BID. Toxicity and oncological results were assessed for both groups, and their relation with dosimetry is described.ResultsMedian follow up was 90 months for interstitial and 27 months for those treated with surface mold. Fourteen of 15 patients are alive and disease-free; one surface mold patient died of non-small-cell lung cancer. There was one relapse in each group, each treated with salvage penectomy. The potency was preserved in 82%. For interstitial, G2 necrosis occurred in 43%, G2 meatal stenosis in 29% and G3 stenosis in 14%.ConclusionsBoth techniques have excellent rates of tumor control and organ preservation. Implant geometry and homogeneity constraints must be carefully designed to minimize toxicity in interstitial brachytherapy. Urethral contouring and reporting of dosimetric parameters should be defined.     

A surrogate urethra for real-time planning of high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy

PurposeThis study characterizes prostatic urethra cross-section to develop a surrogate urethra for accurate prediction of urethral dose during real-time high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.Materials and MethodsArchived preoperative transrectal ultrasound images from 100 patients receiving low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy were used to characterize the prostatic urethra, contoured on ultrasound using aerated gel. Consensus contours, defined using majority vote, described commonalities in cross-sectional shape across patients. Potential simplified surrogates were defined and evaluated against the true urethra. The best performing surrogate, a circle of varying size (CS) was retrospectively contoured on 85 high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plans. Dose to this recommended surrogate was compared with urethral doses estimated by the standard 6 mm circle surrogate.ResultsClear variation in urethral cross-sectional shape was observed along its length and between patients. The standard circle surrogate had low predictive sensitivity (61.1%) compared with true urethra because of underrepresentation of the verumontanum midgland. The CS best represented the true urethra across all validation metrics (dice: 0.73, precision: 67.0%, sensitivity: 83.2%, conformity: 0.78). Retrospective evaluation of planned doses using the CS surrogate resulted in significant differences in all reported urethral dose parameters compared with the standard circle, with the exception of D_100%. The urethral dose limit (115%) was exceeded in 40% of patients for the CS surrogate.ConclusionsThe proposed CS surrogate, consisting of circles of varying diameter, is simple yet better represents the true urethra compared with the standard 6 mm circle. Higher urethral doses were predicted using CS, and the improved accuracy of CS may offer increased predictive power for urethral toxicity, a subject of future work.     

Experience of high-dose-rate brachytherapy for head and neck cancer treated by a customized intraoral mold technique

Radiotherapy of head and neck cancer has become more successful with the advances in treatment modalities and use of a multidisciplinary approach. Higher quality treatment and a team approach to radiotherapy have thus been required for head and neck cancer. This study presents the clinical experience of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for head and neck cancer treated by a customized intraoral mold technique. Two patients are reported for whom we created dental prostheses as the radiation carriers for HDR brachytherapy of their head and neck cancers. HDR brachytherapy with the dental prostheses reported here was feasible and effective for eradicating the head and neck cancer. It has been demonstrated that HDR brachytherapy using a customized intraoral technique can be a treatment option for patients who are not candidates for surgery or external irradiation. It is strongly suggested that specialized dentists are needed who are familiar with not only the anatomy and function of the head and neck region but also radiotherapy. Dental radiologists should take responsibility for constructing irradiation prostheses. If they do, they have the potential to improve the quality of life of patients who undergo radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.     

Radical dose escalation by high-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer—Significance of prostate-specific antigen nadir level within 18 months as correlation for long-term biochemical control

Purpose

High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) for dose escalation in localized prostate cancer has been established as one standard treatment option. However, long-term results at followup (FU) ≥5 years are usually needed to ensure robustness of reported outcomes. Potential benefit of salvage therapy is, nevertheless, higher when relapse is diagnosed early. This study aimed to solve this dilemma by evaluating the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir for early prediction of long-term biochemical control.