Early posttransplant inflammation promotes the development of alloimmunity and chronic human lung allograft rejection

BACKGROUND: Chronic human lung allograft rejection, represented by bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), is the single most important factor that limits the long-term survival following lung transplantation (LT). However, the pathogenesis of BOS remains unclear. We hypothesized that the early posttransplant inflammation would promote the development of donor anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alloimmunity and predispose to BOS. METHODS: Serum levels of interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-15, IL-17, Eotaxin, IP-10, MIG, MCP-1, MIP-1alpha, MIP-1beta, RANTES, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interferon (IFN)-alpha, IFN-gamma, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, IL-1Ralpha, and IL-2R were serially analyzed in 31 BOS+ and matched 31 BOS- patients using quantitative multiplex bead immunoassays. Donor-specific HLA class II cellular immunity was analyzed using enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) by testing recipient peripheral blood mononuclear cells against mismatched donor HLA-DR peptides. Anti-HLA class II antibodies were monitored using flow panel reactive antibodies. RESULTS: There was early posttransplant elevation in basal serum levels of proinflammatory chemokines IP-10 and MCP-1 and Th1-cytokines IL-1beta, IL-2, IL-12, and IL-15 in BOS+ patients, compared to BOS- and normal subjects. In addition, a threefold decline in IL-10 levels was found during BOS development. BOS+ patients revealed increased development of HLA class II alloantibodies and Th1-predominant donor-specific cellular immunity with high frequency of IFN-gamma and low IL-5 producing T-cells. CONCLUSION: Early posttransplant elevation of proinflammatory mediators is associated with alloimmunity and chronic human lung allograft rejection.     

Induction of Obliterative Airway Disease by Anti-HLA Class I Antibodies

Anti-HLA class I Abs are associated with the development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) after lung transplantation. BOS is characterized histologically by fibrosis and airway epithelial cell apoptosis. We have previously shown that anti-HLA class I Abs induce proliferation, growth factor production and apoptosis in airway epithelial cells in vitro. Thus, this study was designed to determine whether anti-HLA class I Abs alone could induce obliterative airway disease (OAD) in heterotopic murine tracheal allografts. Toward this, HLA-A*0201-transgenic tracheal allografts were transplanted into Rag1-deficient mice treated with the W6/32 anti-HLA class I mAb. Allografts were harvested at days +30, +45, +60 and +90. Allografts displayed epithelial metaplasia by day +45, epithelial destruction and mild cellular infiltration by day +60 and complete lumen obliteration and moderate cellular infiltration by day +90. Anti-HLA class I Abs induced the production of several growth factors and growth factor receptors and apoptosis of parenchymal cells in the allograft. In addition, anti-HLA class I Abs induced macrophages and granulocytes infiltration. The results from this study demonstrate that anti-HLA class I Abs play an important role in the pathogenesis of OAD by inducing growth factor production, apoptosis and chemotaxis of inflammatory cells.     

Advances in pre- and posttransplant immunologic testing in kidney transplantation

Pre- and posttransplant risk estimation in kidney transplantation is important for the selection of appropriate treatment strategies. Recently, using new immunologic tests, we made observations within the framework of the Collaborative Transplant Study that may influence clinical practice. Complement-dependent lymphocytotoxic panel reactivity as a measure of anti-HLA sensitization, although criticized for its low sensitivity, is a useful indicator of an increased risk of rejection. Using the more sensitive complement-independent ELISA methodology, which utilizes solubilized HLA molecules instead of lymphocytes, we found that recipients with preformed complement-dependent anti-HLA antibodies showed a decreased graft survival only if their antibodies were directed against both HLA class I and class II, whereas isolated reactivity only against HLA class I or class II was of no clinical consequence. Pretransplant serum-soluble CD30 (sCD30) was found to be an independent and highly predictive factor of immunologic risk. The effects of sCD30 and anti-HLA antibodies were additive. Importantly, even patients without anti-HLA antibodies showed a strong HLA matching effect if their pretransplant serum contained high levels of sCD30. Although the role of anti-HLA antibody formation after transplantation remains uncertain, ELISA-detected sCD30 was shown to indicate impending graft rejection as early as on posttransplant days 3 to 5. Another very sensitive indicator of impending rejection is provided by posttransplant monitoring of the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte effector genes, perforin and granzyme B, in peripheral blood using real-time PCR.     

Development of an antibody specific to major histocompatibility antigens detectable by flow cytometry after lung transplant is associated with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome

BACKGROUND: Chronic allograft rejection manifested as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is the leading cause of late death after lung transplantation. Although increasing evidence suggests an association between anti-human leukocyte antigens (HLA) antibodies and chronic rejection of kidney or heart allografts, the clinical significance of anti-HLA antibodies in lung recipients is less clear, especially in previously unsensitized recipients. The use of flow cytometry based panel reactive antibody (flow-PRA) provides a highly sensitive means to identify the development of de novo anti-HLA antibodies in lung recipients. METHODS: Flow-PRA testing was used to analyze the pre- and posttransplant sera in stable BOS free lung recipients who survived at least 6 months. Patients without prior sensitization as defined by a negative pretransplant flow-PRA were analyzed posttransplant for the presence of anti-HLA antibodies by flow-PRA. A proportional hazards model was used to determine the impact of anti-HLA antibody on BOS risk. RESULTS: Sera from 90 recipients at Duke University with negative pretransplant flow-PRA were tested by flow-PRA at various time points after transplant. Sera from 11% (10/90) of recipients were found to contain anti-HLA antibodies detectable by flow-PRA. Nine patients (90%) developed anti-HLA antibodies specific for donor antigens, and one patient developed anti-HLA class II antibodies, not specific to donor antigens. Among the nine patients with donor antigen specific antibodies, flow-PRA specificity analysis demonstrated eight were specific for class II antigens and one for class I antigens. In a multivariate model that controls for other BOS risk factors, a positive posttransplant flow-PRA was significantly associated with BOS grades 1,2, or 3 (hazard ratios [HR] 3.19; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41-7.12, P=0.005) and BOS grade 2 or 3 (HR 4.08; 95% CI: 1.66-10.04, P=0.002). Four patients with de novo anti-HLA antibodies died during follow-up; all four had BOS. Among BOS patients, the presence of anti-HLA antibodies was associated with a significantly worse survival (P =0.05, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: Although uncommon, previously unsensitized lung transplant recipients can develop anti-HLA antibodies to donor class II antigens. The development of de novo anti-HLA antibodies significantly increases the risk for BOS, independent of other posttransplant events. Furthermore, de novo anti-HLA antibodies identify BOS patients with significantly worse survival. Additional studies are needed to determine if class II-directed anti-HLA antibodies contribute mechanistically to the chronic rejection process in lung recipients.     

Indirect Allorecognition of Mismatched Donor HLA Class II Peptides in Lung Transplant Recipients with Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome

A correlation between indirect allorecognition of mismatched donor HLA class I peptides and development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) after lung transplantation has been previously observed. The aim of this study was to determine whether there was a correlation between indirect allorecognition of mismatched donor HLA class II peptides and development of BOS after lung transplantation. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from nine BOS+ and nine BOS-lung transplant recipients were cultured with synthetic peptides corresponding to the beta-chain hypervariable region of a mismatched donor HLA-DR molecule. Then, proliferative alloreactivity as well as frequency of alloreactive T cells were determined. In addition, the immunodominant epitopes from the donor HLA-DR molecules were identified in selected patients. T cells from BOS+ patients showed a dose-dependent proliferative alloreactivity against donor HLA-DR peptides that was significantly higher than that observed in BOS- patients (p=0.001). Similarly, the frequency of HLA-DR alloreactive T cells was significantly higher in BOS+ patients than in BOS- patients (p=0.001). This T-cell alloreactivity was directed against a single immunodominant HLA-DR peptide. These results suggest that indirect alloreactivity to donor HLA class II molecules may play a role in the pathogenesis of BOS after lung transplantation.     

Anti-HLA Antibodies After Precocious Transplantectomy by Vascular Thrombosis

Background

Our objective in this study was to determine the effects of early renal transplantectomy on patients and the production of anti–human leukocyte antigen (anti-HLA) antibodies.

Frequency of Human Leukocyte Antigens and Donor Specific Antibodies in Long-Term Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

PurposeHLA antibodies have been shown to be associated with late graft loss. In this study, we defined the incidence and profiles of anti-HLA antibodies and their impact on graft outcome in long-term kidney recipients.MethodsThe sera of 118 kidney transplant recipients were screened for anti-HLA antibody presence. The antigen specificity of the detected HLA class I and class II antibodies was identified using a Luminex assay (Luminex Corp, Austin, TX, United States). Presence of donor specific antibodies (DSA) was examined in individuals with anti-HLA antibodies using the Luminex method.ResultsAnti-HLA class I and/or class II antibodies were detected in serum of 16.1% of the kidney transplant patients. The antibodies were directed against HLA class I antigens in 4 patients (21.1%), HLA class II antigens in 9 patients (47.4%), and both class I and class II antigens in 6 patients (31.6%). The overall prevalence of DSA was 10.2%. Anti-HLA antibodies were significantly associated with higher rate of cyclosporine use. Presence of DSA was associated with a lower rate of tacrolimus use, a higher rate of cyclosporine use, and lower donor age. Presence of anti-HLA antibodies was associated with higher acute cellular rejection and higher chronic active humoral rejection rates. Presence of DSA was associated with chronic active humoral rejection.ConclusionThe presence of either HLA antibodies or DSA significantly correlated with lower graft survival, poor transplant function, and proteinuria.     

Monitoring of anti-HLA class I and II antibodies by flow cytometry in patients after first cadaveric kidney transplantation

While the relevance of pre-formed anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies has been studied extensively, the role of anti-HLA class I and II antibodies produced after cadaveric kidney transplantation is still a matter of discussion. As it has been proposed that they are involved in a considerable number of cases, it should be investigated whether a post-transplant monitoring is a sensitive parameter for the early diagnosis of acute rejection episodes. Additionally, it has been suggested that antibodies are a major cause for chronic rejection; thus, it would be of interest to correlate antibody detection and graft survival. We retrospectively investigated 59 patients after a first cadaveric kidney transplantation without known anti-HLA antibodies (complement-dependent cytotoxicity [CDC] testing). The panel reactivity was determined with a new highly sensitive and specific flow-cytometric technique (Flow-PRA Screening Test, One Lambda, Canoga Park, USA) in sequentially collected serum samples pre- and post-transplant. In patients with acute rejection episodes during the clinical course, the last sample prior to rejection, and in patients without rejection, the last sample prior to discharge, was analyzed. Furthermore, we analyzed 3-yr graft survival and several clinical parameters such as cold ischemia time (CIT). Twenty-four of 59 patients (41%) experienced acute rejections during the clinical course. Five of 59 died with a functioning graft within the first 3 yr. Seven of 54 patients, still alive after 3 yr, lost their graft. Anti-HLA antibodies were detectable in only 7/59 patients and a correlation between antibody positivity and acute rejections (p = 0.32 and 0.54 for anti-HLA class I and II, respectively) could not be identified (sensitivity 12.5 and 8.3%). However, we found a significant correlation between the detection of anti-HLA class II and graft loss within 3 yr (p = 0.005, specificity 97.9%). Additionally, anti-HLA class II positive patients had significantly longer CIT (p = 0.003). Whether the detection of anti-HLA class II antibodies in the early post-transplant phase is of great value for the identification of patients at high risk for early graft loss needs additional investigation. However, we found that anti-HLA antibodies are detectable only in a minority of unsensitized patients and we conclude that flow-cytometric monitoring with Flow PRA is not a sensitive parameter for the early diagnosis of acute rejection episodes in patients after first cadaveric kidney transplantation.     

A Significant Role for Anti–Human Leukocyte Antigen Antibodies and Antibody-Mediated Rejection in the Biopsy-for-Cause Population

The role of anti–human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies and antibody-mediated rejection is well known, but our comprehension and the preventive measures we take seem to be insufficient. One of the major causes of premature renal transplant loss is recepients' immunologic hyperactivity to donors' antigens. Monitoring of humoral alloreactivity gives hope for early diagnosis and adequate therapy. The goal of our analysis was the assessment of the influence of anti-HLA antibodies on the function and survival of transplants. In our study we included 60 consecutive renal transplant recipients who had a renal transplant biopsy-for-cause performed due to insufficiency. Transplant biopsies were performed between the 7th day and 12th year (median, 2 years) after transplantation. Anti-HLA antibodies were present in 20 patients (33%). The patients were divided into 2 groups according the presence of anti-HLA antibodies. In a 12-month observation, 10/20 (50%) patients in the anti-HLA(+) group returned to dialysis in contrast with 7/40 (17.5%; P = .014) in the anti-HLA(−) group. Also, 8/10 (80%) of the anti-HLA(+) patients who lost the transplant had anti-HLA Abs class II and only 2/10 (20%) had anti-HLA Abs class I. Anti-HLA antibodies were specific to a donor (donor-specific antibodies [DSA]) in 8/10 (80%) of the patients who lost the transplant. Anti-HLA antibodies appeared de novo in 50% of patients who lost the transplant. Nonadherence was suspected in 50% of patients. Acute humoral rejection occurred in 1 patient. Also, 8/10 (90%) developed chronic active humoral rejection. Our study revealed that graft loss in the renal transplant biopsy-for-cause population with the presence of anti-HLA Abs during a 12-month observation reached 50%. Nonadherence in these patients was very high and amounted to 50%. Monitoring of renal transplant recipients and individualization of therapy considering humoral activity should prolong renal graft survival.     

Kidney graft failure and presensitization against HLA class I and class II antigens

BACKGROUND: It is well known that kidney transplant recipients with preformed lymphocytotoxic antibodies against HLA antigens have an increased graft rejection rate. However, the individual contribution of anti-HLA class I and class II antibodies to this phenomenon is poorly understood. We investigated the clinical relevance of preformed anti-HLA class I and class II antibodies on graft outcome in more than 4000 kidney recipients. METHODS: Pretransplant sera of 4136 cadaver kidney recipients from 28 transplant centers were tested in ELISA for IgG-anti-HLA class I and IgG-anti-HLA class II antibodies. The influence of antibody reactivity on graft survival was analyzed. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty of the anti-HLA class I antibody-positive recipients had a graft survival rate at 2 years of 77+/-2%, compared with an 84+/-1% rate in 3656 anti-HLA class I antibody-negative recipients (P<0.0001), and 770 anti-HLA class II-positive recipients had a graft survival rate of 79+/-2%, compared with an 84+/-1% rate in 3366 anti-HLA class II-negative patients (P<0.0001). Importantly, good 2-year graft survival rates of 85+/-3% and 84+/-2%, respectively, were observed in 206 anti-HLA class I-positive/class II-negative and 496 anti-HLA, class I-negative/class II-positive recipients. In contrast, the 274 recipients positive for both types of antibodies showed a poor graft survival rate of 71+/-3% (P<0.0001). Among 853 patients who received a well-matched kidney (0 or 1 HLA-A+B+DR mismatch), sensitization against either class I or class II, or both, had no deleterious effect. However, in 113 class I and class II antibody-positive patients who received a kidney with > or =3 HLA-A+B+DR mismatches, the 2-year graft survival rate was only 60+/-5%. CONCLUSION: Presensitization of first kidney transplant recipients against either HLA class I or class II is of no clinical consequence, whereas sensitization against both HLA class I and class II results in increased rejection of HLA mismatched grafts.     

Differential inhibitory effects of intravenous immunoglobulin preparations on HLA-alloantibodies in vitro

BACKGROUND: Treatment of allosensitized patients with intravenously administered pooled immunoglobulin preparations (IVIG) may lead to a long-lasting reduction of anti-HLA alloantibody titers. An inhibitory response of IVIG preparations on lymphocytotoxicity is suggested to depend on IgG and to predict a successful reduction of anti-HLA alloantibodies upon the administration of high-dose IVIG in vivo. METHODS: In this study, we evaluated different IVIG preparations for their in vitro inhibitory capacity on lymphocytotoxicity and binding of anti-HLA alloantibodies to purified HLA antigens. For that purpose sera from 24 highly sensitized patients awaiting kidney transplantation and serological HLA testing reagents were used. Panel-reactive antibody (PRA) determinations using standard complement-dependent cytotoxicity testing and anti-HLA alloantibody determination by ELISA were carried out in the presence and absence of 50% (v/v) IVIG. RESULTS: The addition of IgG-containing IVIG preparations gave only a moderate inhibitory response judging from the average decrease of PRA levels (absolute DeltaPRA range: -2% to 16%), whereas the largest inhibition of lymphocytotoxicity was seen after the addition of IgM/IgA-containing IVIG preparations (absolute DeltaPRA range: 19% to 44%). For both IgG and IgM/IgA-containing IVIG preparations, the reduction of lymphocytotoxicity occurred in a dose-dependent fashion without a preference for particular anti-HLA class I antibody specificities. Significantly lower inhibitory effects on anti-HLA antibody reactivity were observed when the effects of IVIG preparations were monitored by ELISA (absolute DeltaPRA range: 7% to 22%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the immunomodulatory capacity is largely caused by the IgM/IgA fraction of IVIG when analyzed by lymphocytotoxicity. The different effect on ELISA versus complement-dependent cytotoxicity testing suggests that interactions of IVIG with complement rather than anti-idiotypic antibodies may contribute to the inhibitory effects of IVIG in vitro.     

Sensitization Following LVAD Implantation Using Leucodepleted Blood Is Not Due to HLA Antibodies

Implantation of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) is associated with HLA antibody sensitization. The objective of this study was to determine the specificity of antibodies produced by LVAD recipients using a combination of ELISA, Luminex and microcytotoxicity assays. Fifty-one LVAD patients were studied, from 44 to 838 days post-implantation. No patient developed HLA antibodies, although 24 produced IgG antibodies detectable in both ELISA and Luminex assays. These antibodies manifest as positive reactions with class I and class II wells of the ELISA and also blank wells. In Luminex assays, they produce high MFI readings with the negative control beads. Antibodies were detected 18 to 228 days after implantation. This reactivity was found to be directed against bovine serum albumin (BSA), commonly used to block non-specific binding in ELISA and Luminex assays; absorption of sera with BSA-coated beads completely abrogated reactivity in all solid phase assays, but did not eliminate anti-HLA antibodies in control sera. Ten of the 24 patients have proceeded to transplantation, with a 1-year graft survival of 69%. In conclusion, it appears that implantation of LVADS disrupts immunoregulatory pathways leading to production of anti-albumin antibodies. These can be misinterpreted as anti-HLA antibodies in solid phase assays.     

Prevalence and significance of anti-HLA and donor-specific antibodies long-term after renal transplantation

Post-transplant circulating anti-human leukocyte antigens (HLA)-antibodies and C4d in allograft biopsies may be important in chronic rejection in renal transplant recipients (RTR). We determined the prevalence and significance of anti-HLA-antibodies and donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Sera were collected from 251 RTR >6 months post-transplant. Sera were tested using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) screening for anti-HLA antibodies. Positive sera were retested with ELISA-specific panel for antibody specificity. A 11.2% of patients had anti-HLA antibodies and 4.4% had DSA. Anti-HLA antibodies were significantly associated with pretransplant sensitization, acute rejection and in multivariate analysis, higher serum creatinine (2.15 +/- 0.98 vs. 1.57 +/- 0.69 mg/dl in negative anti-HLA antibodies group). Allograft biopsies performed in a subset of patients with anti-HLA antibodies revealed that 66% had C4d in peritubular capillaries (0% in patients without antibodies). Anti-HLA antibodies were associated with a worse allograft function and in situ evidence of anti-donor humoral alloreactivity. Long-term RTR with an increase in creatinine could be screened for anti-HLA antibodies and C4d in biopsy.     

Detection of anti-HLA antibody by flow cytometry in patients with a left ventricular assist device is associated with early rejection following heart transplantation

BACKGROUND: Patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to heart transplantation (HT) often have elevated levels of panel reactive antibodies (PRA). The clinical significance of anti-human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies detected by flow cytometry in PRA negative patients remains unclear. METHODS: Eighteen patients who underwent LVAD placement as a successful bridge to HT had standard anti-human globulin complement-dependent cytotoxicity and retrospective flow cytometry assays performed to detect class I anti-HLA antibodies. A positive flow result was defined as a fluorescent ratio of 23:1 versus a negative control. RESULTS: Six patients had anti-HLA antibodies detected by flow cytometry. Univariate analysis demonstrated more moderate-severe rejection episodes (ISHLT > or = IIIA) at 2 months (0.83+/-0.75 vs. 0; P=0.04) and a trend toward decreased time to first rejection (61+/-17 vs. 225+/-62 days; P=0.06) in these patients. No differences were observed in donor-recipient HLA mismatch or 1 year Kaplan-Meier survival between patients with or without anti-HLA antibodies. CONCLUSION: Despite a negative PRA, LVAD patients with class I anti-HLA antibodies detected by flow cytometry have a greater incidence of moderate-severe rejection in the first 2 months after HT. Flow cytometry may be a useful clinical tool in screening PRA negative LVAD patients before transplantation. Patients with positive anti-HLA antibody screening by flow cytometry may require more intensive immunosuppression in the early post-HT period.     

Identification of the antibodies involved in B-cell crossmatch positivity in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: The significance of a positive B-cell crossmatch (BCM) in kidney transplantation has always been controversial in the evaluation of its implications on graft survival and specificity of the antibodies involved. METHODS: We have investigated the sera of 62 recipients of a kidney allograft transplanted across a positive BCM (T negative) for the presence of autoantibodies and anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and II antibodies, using a combination of lymphocytotoxicity, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and flow cytometry tests. The controls were the 930 patients transplanted over the same period of time with a negative T and BCM. RESULTS: Autoantibodies were detected in 16%, and donor specific anti-HLA class II antibodies, mainly DQ, in 23% of the patients. None had antibodies against donor HLA class I. The target of the antibodies was not identified in 61%. Graft survival was comparable in the controls and in the +BCM patients, with nondonor-specific HLA reactivity. Patients with donor-specific anti-HLA class II antibodies had lower early graft survival and a higher incidence of vascular rejection. However, long-term allograft survival was similar to that of the other groups. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that in 77% of the patients, BCM positivity was not related with anti-HLA antibodies, and, in this case, graft survival was similar to that of the -BCM controls. In a minority of patients, anti-HLA class II antibodies were responsible for the +BCM, and their presence was associated with lower early, but not long-term, graft survival. Consequently, a +BCM should not systematically contraindicate kidney transplantation.     

Post-transplantation anti-HLA antibodies: which relevance?

Anti-HLA antibodies formed de novo post-transplantation are involved in the development of acute humoral rejection also known as antibody-mediated rejection. This form of rejection is characterized by histological lesions, a positive C4d-staining of peritubular capillaries and anti-donor antibodies. The presence of anti-HLA antibodies indicates a poor prognosis as it is associated with a highly significant increase of graft loss risk, which might depend on antibody concentration. To prevent acute humoral rejection, antibodies must be systematically detected 3 months after transplantation with sensitive methods using recombinant HLA antigens that allow detecting anti-HLA antibodies by ELISA, flow cytometric panel-reactive antibodies test or immunobead flow cytometric assay, the intensity of fluorescence determining the concentration of anti-HLA antibodies. In case of acute graft dysfunction, antibody-mediated rejection must be treated by a combination of immunosuppressive drugs, antibodies, intra-venous immunoglobulins and/or plasmaphereses.     

Anti-HLA antibodies in kidney transplanted patients

Anti-human leukocyte antibodies (HLA) play a central role in graft survival, particularly in kidney transplantation. The presence of preformed donor specific anti-HLA antibodies is always excluded before transplantation by performing crossmatches using current and historic recipient serum samples. Several recent studies have observed a correlation between HLA antibodies and graft rejection. It has been suggested that these antibodies should be monitored routinely after kidney transplant to predict graft failure. Here in report the results of a study of on serum samples from 111 kidney transplant recipients that were monitored for anti-HLA antibodies using flow cytometry. Anti-HLA antibodies were only detected in four pre-immunized patients and showed the same HLA specificity that was present before the transplantation (in two cases against previous graft antigens). Furthermore, only two patients with functioning grafts developed anti-HLA antibodies, at 1 month and 1 year after the transplantation. However, they were not donor specific, but probably related to posttransplant transfusions. In our study, none of the patients who suffered an adverse event during the first year (including two with histologically documented acute rejection) developed anti-HLA antibodies. These results are probably related to the use of mycophenolate mofetil, which may reduce the incidence of HLA antibodies. We cannot exclude the possibility that antibodies produced by some patients may not be detectable because they are attached to the graft.     

肾移植术后监测受者抗HLA抗体的临床意义

目的 监测肾移植受者术后抗HLA抗体水平,探讨新生的抗HLA抗体对移植肾功能的影响.方法 共有384例肾移植受者术后进行了抗HLA抗体的监测,监测时间3～96个月,所有受者术前的抗HLA抗体水平均为阴性.使用莱姆德抗原板,采用酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)检测抗HLA抗体,抗HLA抗体水平＞10%为阳性.对术后抗HLA抗体阳性者与阴性者间移植肾功能进行比较,观察新生抗HLA抗体对移植肾功能的影响.结果 术后抗HLA抗体阴性者318例(82.8%);阳性者66例(17.2%),其中抗HLA Ⅰ类抗体阳性者3例,抗HLAⅡ类抗体阳性者61例,抗HLA Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类抗体均为阳性者2例.HLA-DR位点0个抗原错配者92例受者中有7例新生抗HLA抗体,1～2个抗原错配者292例中有59例新生抗HLA抗体,二者比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01).术后抗HLA抗体阴性者中移植肾功能良好者占87.4%(278/318),抗HLA抗体阳性者中移植肾功能良好者占65.2%(43/66),二者比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论 HLADR位点的抗原错配与肾移植后抗HLA抗体的产生密切相关,而新生抗HLA抗体会造成移植肾功能下降,从而降低移植存活率,肾移植术后监测抗HLA抗体有一定的临床意义.

Abstract：

Objective To detect de novo development of anti-HLA antibodies after renal transplantation, and to investigate their influence on graft function. Methods 384 kidney recipients,who were negative for anti-HLA antibody before transplantation, were monitored for anti-HLA antibodies over a period of 3-96 months, and a sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to detect anti-HLA antibodies. HLA antibody ＞10 % was defined as positive levels. Results Among 384 recipients tested, 318 recipients (82. 8 %) were negative for anti-HLA antibody after transplantation; 66 recipients (17. 2 %) developed de novo HLA antibodies, 3 recipients with HLA class Ⅰ, 61 with HLA class Ⅱ, 2 with both HLA class Ⅰ and Ⅱ. According to amino acid residue matching, 7 cases developed de novo antibodies among 92 recipients with 0 HLA-DR mismatches,compared with 59 cases among 292 recipients with 1-2 mismatches, which showed significant difference between two groups (P＜0. 01 ). 87. 4 % (278/318) recipients negative for HLA antibodies after transplantation achieved good graft function, in comparison with 65. 2 % (43/66) recipients positive for HLA antibodies (P＜0. 05). Conclusion De novo production of HLA antibodies posttransplantation may be closely associated with HLA-DR mismatch. De novo HLA antibodies posttransplantation might damage graft function and reduce graft survival rate. The detection of de novo development of anti-HLA antibodies after renal transplantation has clinical significance for assessing renal allograft function.     

酶联免疫吸附抗原板LAT1HD与LAT1240检测抗HLA Ⅰ类抗体的对比分析

目的分析基于酶联免疫吸附试验(enzyme-linked immune absorbentassay,ELISA)的莱姆德抗原板(LAT1240)与单一抗原检测板(LAT1HD)在肾移植受者抗HLAⅠ类抗体检测中的异同和应用价值。方法采用基于ELISA的用LAT1240与LAT1HD分别检测73例已经莱姆德酶标混合抗原板(LATM)确定抗HLAⅠ类抗体阳性的等待肾移植的患者血清样本。比较两种抗原板的平均阳性反应强度、阳性率、抗体特异性分析等方面的异同。结果两种抗原板的平均阳性反应强度差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。LAT1HD所测出的抗HLA抗体阳性率较LAT1240低,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。两种抗原板分辨出的抗HLA抗体特异性完全相同18例(25%),1例完全不同,其余54例结果存在部分差异。5例样本用LAT1240分辨出包含抗Cw抗原的抗体,而用LAT1HD分辨出用LAT1240未能检出的抗HLA-A或B抗体。用LAT1240检测为高度致敏(群体反应性抗体60%)的样本中,有9例经群体反应性抗体分析软件不能分析出抗HLA抗体的特异性,但可以由LAT1HD分辨出来。共有21例致敏患者接受了肾移植手术,随访1年以上,人/肾存活率达100%。其中6例发生急性排斥反应,使用抗胸腺细胞球蛋白或甲泼尼龙冲击治疗,5例受者逆转,1例效果不佳。结论与使用LAT1240检测的结果比较,用LAT1HD检测出的特异性抗体更为准确,更适用于临床。