The use of an underlay polypropylene mesh in complicated incisional hernias: sucessful French surgical technique

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia repair with conventional techniques is associated with high recurrence rates of 30-50%. Surgical repair using different prosthetic biomaterials is becoming increasingly popular. On the basis of the favourable results by French surgeons, the results of underlay prosthetic mesh repair using polypropylene mesh in complicated and recurrent incisional hernias have been studied. METHODS: After preparation and excision of the entire hernia sac, the peritoneum and posterior rectus sheath are closed with a continuous looped polyglyconate suture. The prosthesis used for the midline hernias is positioned on the posterior rectus sheath and extends far beyond the borders of the myoaponeurotic defect. The prosthesis for lumbar and subcostal hernias is placed in a prepared space between the transverse and oblique muscles. Intraperitoneal placement of the mesh must be avoided. Between January 1997 and September 1998 a total of 57 incisional hernia repair (25 primary hernias, 32 recurrent hernias) have been performed using this technique (28 women, 29 men, mean age 56+/-13 years). RESULTS: Local complications occurred in 6 patients (11%). One patient suddenly died on the 3rd postoperative day from severe pulmonary embolism (mortality 1,7%). Thirthy-seven patients with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were reexamined clinically (follow up time 6-33 months). Till now one recurrent hernia has been observed. There were only minor complaints like a feeling of tension in the abdominal wall (n = 3) and slight pain under physical stress (n = 9). CONCLUSIONS: The aforementioned technique of underlay prosthetic repair allows an anatomical and consolidated reconstruction of the damaged abdominal wall with excellent results and low complication rates especially in high risk patients and complicated hernias.     

Elective colonic operation and prosthetic repair of incisional hernia: does contamination contraindicate abdominal wall prosthesis use?

BACKGROUND: Wound infection and sepsis leading to incisional hernia development are common after emergency colonic operations. Later on, while being operated on to correct an incisional hernia, most of these patients will need colonic resection or bowel continuity reestablishment. Simultaneous treatment of incisional hernias in patients with colostomy or colonic disease remains a difficult challenge, considering the reluctance of most surgeons to treat both conditions at the same time, especially when prosthetic repair is needed. STUDY DESIGN: The aim of this study was to analyze the short-term results of patients undergoing colonic resection or bowel continuity reestablishment and simultaneous incisional hernia repair with an onlay polypropylene mesh technique. Over a period of 6 years, 20 patients were operated on for colonic problems associated with incisional hernias, including 8 Hartmanns' colostomies, 6 colostomies or ileostomies with colonic mucous fistulas, 3 postoperative colocutaneous fistulas, a paracolostomic hernia, a Chagas' megacolon, and a pseudotumoral diverticulitis. A "rule of three" statistical analysis was used to estimate the maximum risk of adverse effects, concerning mesh-related morbidity, after 1- and 2-year followup. RESULTS: A major complication occurred in a patient who developed an anastomotic leakage and secondary wound infection; the patient was treated with parenteral nutrition and antibiotics. Other complications included a minor wound infection, a seroma, and a chronic sinus. One patient died from postoperative problems unrelated to the surgical technique. The occurrence of postoperative wound infection did not prevent mesh incorporation. Followup ranging from 1 to 7 years detected no hernia recurrences; 13 patients were followed for 2 years or more. Our results suggest that risk of mesh-related morbidity does not exceed 15.8% (3 of 19) within the first year and 23.1% (3 of 13) for 2 years followup, with 95% confidence. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that prosthetic repair of incisional hernias associated with simultaneous colonic operations was possible, allowing abdominal wall anatomy reestablishment. There is no reason to believe that abdominal wall prostheses must be avoided in contaminated operations when an adequate surgical technique is used.     

Porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) for abdominal wall reconstruction

OBJECTIVE: A review of Eisenhower Army Medical Center's experience using Permacol (Tissue Science Laboratories, Covington, Georgia) for the repair of abdominal wall defects. METHODS: Retrospective review of medical records of patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction with Permacol. RESULTS: From July 30, 2003 to February 12, 2005, 9 patients underwent repair of complicated fascial defects with Permacol. Indications for surgery included reoperative incisional hernia repair after removal of a infected mesh (3 patients), reconstruction of a fascial defect after resection of an abdominal wall tumor (2 patients), incisional hernia repair in a patient with a previous abdominal wall infection after a primary incisional hernia repair (1 patient), incisional hernia repair in a patient with an ostomy and an open midline wound (1 patient), emergent repair of incisional hernia with strangulated bowel and multiple intra-abdominal abscesses (1 patient), and excision of infected mesh and drainage of intra-abdominal abscess with synchronous repair of the abdominal wall defect (1 patient). At a median follow-up of 18.2 months, 1 recurrent hernia existed after intentional removal of the Permacol. This patient developed an abdominal wall abscess 7 months after hernia repair secondary to erosion from a suture. Overall, 1 patient developed exposure of the Permacol after a skin dehiscence. The wound was treated with local wound care, and the Permacol was salvaged. Despite the presence of contamination (wound classification II, III, or IV) in 5 of 9 patients (56%), no infectious complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Complex reconstruction of the abdominal wall can be associated with a high complication rate. Placement of a permanent prosthetic mesh in a contaminated field is associated with a high rate of wound infections and subsequent mesh removal. Permacol becomes incorporated by tissue ingrowth and neovascularization. Permacol is a safe and acceptable alternative to prosthetic mesh in the repair of complicated abdominal wall defects.     

Progressive fascial wound failure impairs subsequent abdominal wall repairs: a new animal model of incisional hernia formation

BACKGROUND: Fascial wound failure alters the phenotype of the abdominal wall. This study introduces a novel animal model of progressive failure of the ventral abdominal wall fascia, which generates large incisional hernias. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A mechanistic model of incisional hernia was compared with a model of acute myofascial defect hernia repair. Using biological tissue repair markers, tensiometric measurements and recurrent hernia rate, we measured the mechanism by which incisional hernias regenerate abdominal wall structure and function after mesh and suture herniorrhaphy. RESULTS: Recurrent incisional hernia formation was significantly increased after repairs of the hernia model, compared with the myofascial defect model (6/16 vs 0/16, P < .05). In the hernia model, there were significant decreases in the recovery of wound strength, energy, and extensibility before mechanical disruption, compared with the myofascial defect model. Unexpectedly, excision of fascial hernia wound edges did not significantly improve tissue repair outcomes in the hernia model group. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically accurate animal modeling can recreate the wound pathology expressed in mature incisional hernias. Progressive fascial wound failure decreases the fidelity of subsequent incisional hernia repair, compared with identically sized acute abdominal wall defect repairs. The mechanism appears to include decreased fascial wound strength and decreased tissue compliance after herniorrhaphy.     

Laparoscopic repair of iatrogenic diaphragmatic hernias after sternectomy and pedicled omentoplasty

Purpose

During sternectomy and pedicled omental flap transposition for the treatment of deep sternal wound infections, an ectopic diaphragmatic aperture is created. This may be the site of an iatrogenic diaphragmatic hernia, which may result in the herniation of intra-abdominal organs, and is difficult to repair. Although this complication was described as early as 1991, no effective treatment for this condition has been described previously.

Methods

The defect in poststernectomy diaphragmatic hernias has features similar to other incisional abdominal wall hernias, as well as to parastomal hernias and hiatal diaphragmatic hernias. We describe our laparoscopic approach developed from experience with these other types of hernias. We use an intraperitoneal flat mesh without keyhole. Fixation of the mesh to the anterior abdominal wall and to the diaphragm is done with a combination of sutures and spiral tackers. The omental pedicle is lateralised, fixed to the diaphragm and covered with the mesh. Special caution is needed when spiral tackers are applied to the diaphragm, because fatal complications of pericardial and cardiac injury have been described in laparoscopic hiatal diaphragmatic hernia repair.

Results

We used this technique in four patients who presented with a symptomatic poststernectomy diaphragmatic hernia. No procedure-related intra-operative or postoperative complications occurred. With a follow up of at least 12 months, no clinical or radiographic recurrence of diaphragmatic herniation has been encountered.

Conclusion

We describe a laparoscopic technique to repair this difficult diaphragmatic hernia used in four patients, with a good clinical and computed tomographic outcome at 12 months.     

Complex abdominal wall reconstruction: a comparison of flap and mesh closure

OBJECTIVE: To analyze a series of patients treated for recurrent or chronic abdominal wall hernias and determine a treatment protocol for defect reconstruction. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Complex or recurrent abdominal wall defects may be the result of a failed prior attempt at closure, trauma, infection, radiation necrosis, or tumor resection. The use of prosthetic mesh as a fascial substitute or reinforcement has been widely reported. In wounds with unstable soft tissue coverage, however, the use of prosthetic mesh poses an increased risk for extrusion or infection, and vascularized autogenous tissue may be required to achieve herniorrhaphy and stable coverage. METHODS: Patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction for 106 recurrent or complex defects (104 patients) were retrospectively analyzed. For each patient, hernia etiology, size and location, average time present, technique of reconstruction, and postoperative results, including recurrence and complication rates, were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups based on defect components: Type I defects with intact or stable skin coverage over hernia defect, and Type II defects with unstable or absent skin coverage over hernia defect. The defects were also assigned to one of the following zones based on primary defect location to assist in the selection and evaluation of their treatment: Zone 1A, upper midline; Zone IB, lower midline; Zone 2, upper quadrant; Zone 3, lower quadrant. RESULTS: A majority of the defects (68%) were incisional hernias. Of 50 Type I defects, 10 (20%) were repaired directly, 28 (56%) were repaired with mesh only, and 12 (24%) required flap reconstruction. For the 56 Type II defects reconstructed, flaps were used in the majority of patients (n = 48; 80%). The overall complication and recurrence rates for the series were 29% and 8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For Type I hernias with stable skin coverage, intraperitoneal placement of Prolene mesh is preferred, and has not been associated with visceral complications or failure of hernia repair. For Type II defects, the use of flaps is advisable, with tensor fascia lata representing the flap of choice, particularly in the lower abdomen. Rectus advancement procedures may be used for well-selected midline defects of either type. The concept of tissue expansion to increase both the fascial dimensions of the flap and zones safely reached by flap transposition is introduced. Overall failure is often is due to primary closure under tension, extraperitoneal placement of mesh, flap use for inappropriate zone, or technical error in flap use. With use of the proposed algorithm based on defect analysis and location, abdominal wall reconstruction has been achieved in 92% of patients with complex abdominal defects.     

Components separation: a solution to complex abdominal wall defects

Complex abdominal wall hernias can be challenging to treat. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review the results of components separation. Seventeen patients underwent components separation between 2000 and 2007. Mean size of the hernia defect was 318 cm2. Mean number of prior abdominal operations/patient was 3.2. Nine patients (53%) had prior failed repair. At time of components separation, five patients (29%) had concurrent gastrointestinal operations and two (12%) had panniculectomy. Mean hospitalization stay was 3.8 days with a readmission rate of 41 per cent. The most common postoperative complications were wound related and occurred in 35 per cent of patients. During a mean follow-up of 21 months, only one patient had recurrent hernia (6%). Five patients (29%) required additional operations. Components separation is a viable option for patients with complex abdominal wall defects. Long-term recurrence is rare but wound related complications, operative reinterventions, and hospital readmission are common.     

Staged management of giant abdominal wall defects: acute and long-term results

INTRODUCTION: Shock resuscitation leads to visceral edema often precluding abdominal wall closure. We have developed a staged approach encompassing acute management through definitive abdominal wall reconstruction. The purpose of this report is to analyze our experience with this technique applied to the treatment of patients with open abdomen and giant abdominal wall defects. METHODS: Our management scheme for giant abdominal wall defects consists of 3 stages: stage I, absorbable mesh insertion for temporary closure (if edema quickly resolves within 3-5 days, the mesh is gradually pleated, allowing delayed fascial closure); stage II, absorbable mesh removal in patients without edema resolution (2-3 weeks after insertion to allow for granulation and fixation of viscera) and formation of the planned ventral hernia with either split thickness skin graft or full thickness skin closure over the viscera; and stage III, definitive reconstruction after 6-12 months (allowing for inflammation and dense adhesion resolution) by using the modified components separation technique. Consecutive patients from 1993 to 2001 at a single institution were evaluated. Outcomes were analyzed by management stage, with emphasis on wound related morbidity and mortality, and fistula and recurrent hernia rates. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy four patients (35 with sepsis, 239 with hemorrhagic shock) were managed. There were 212 males (77%), and mean age was 37 (range, 12-88). The average size of the defects was 20 x 30 cm. In the stage I group, 108 died (92% of all deaths) because of shock. The remaining 166 had temporary closure with polyglactin 910 woven absorbable mesh. As visceral edema resolved, bedside pleating of the absorbable mesh allowed delayed fascial closure in 37 patients (22%). In the stage II group, 9 died (8% of all deaths) from multiple organ failure associated with their underlying disease process, and 96% of the remaining 120 had split-thickness skin graft placed over the viscera. No wound related mortality occurred. There were a total of 14 fistulae (5% of total, 8% of survivors). In the stage III group, to date, 73 of the 120 have had definitive abdominal wall reconstruction using the modified components separation technique. There were no deaths. Mean follow-up was 24 months, (range 2-60). Recurrent hernias developed in 4 of these patients (5%). CONCLUSIONS: The staged management of patients with giant abdominal wall defects without the use of permanent mesh results in a safe and consistent approach for both initial and definitive management with low morbidity and no technique-related mortality. Absorbable mesh provides effective temporary abdominal wall defect coverage with a low fistula rate. Because of the low recurrent hernia rate and avoidance of permanent mesh, the components separation technique is the procedure of choice for definitive abdominal wall reconstruction.     

Reconstruction of the abdominal wall for incisional hernia repair

BACKGROUND: Abdominal wall reconstruction with mobilization of autologous tissue has evolved as a reliable option for patients with incisional hernias. METHODS: With the aim of evaluating morbidity and recurrence rates in patients who underwent abdominal wall reconstruction for incisional hernia repair, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of 188 patients treated between 1996 and 2003. RESULTS: Primary approximation of the fascial defect was achieved in 77% and was reinforced by either mesh placement or rectus muscle advancement. The remaining 23% were reconstructed either by mesh placement, components separation, or distant flap mobilization. Median follow-up was 15 months. Overall morbidity rate was 38%; recurrence rate was 13%. Dimensions of the hernia and intraoperative enterotomies were associated with postoperative complications. Lack of complete restoration of the myofascial abdominal wall continuity was associated with recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with incisional hernias, techniques involving autologous tissue mobilization are safe and associated with low recurrence rates.     

Influence of laser -- infrared irradiation on local complications of early postoperative period in hernias of anterior abdominal wall

Results of laser-infrared irradiation (LIRI) of postoperative wound after surgical treatment of recurrent hernias of anterior abdominal wall were analyzed. LIRI decreased number of local complications in early postoperative period in patients both with recurrent and primary hernias. The method was more effective for the treatment of local complication in patients with recurrent hernia that is confirmed by reduced of frequency of infiltrates, seromas and suppurations.     

The prevention of incisional hernia formation using a delayed-release polymer of basic fibroblast growth factor

OBJECTIVE: We sought to reduce the high incidence of abdominal wall incisional hernias using sustained release growth factor therapy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Incisional hernias complicate 11% of abdominal wall closures, resulting in 200,000 incisional hernia repairs in the United States each year. Mechanical improvements alone in mesh, suture material, and surgical technique have failed to reduce the high rate of fascial wound failure. METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats underwent midline celiotomies that were closed with fast-absorbing suture to induce early biomechanical wound failure and incisional hernia formation. In primary wounds, fascial incisions were closed adjacent to a continuous release polygalactone polymer rod containing basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), no growth factor (control-rod), or without rods. In a second group, incisional hernias were repaired with either bFGF or control-rod therapy. Breaking strength was measured on postoperative day (POD) 7, and the incidence of incisional hernia formation was determined on POD 28. RESULTS: Treatment with bFGF rods significantly increased fascial wound breaking strength. In the "hernia-prevention" experiments, incisional hernias developed in 90% of untreated incisions, 60% of control-rod incisions, and only 30% of bFGF-rod incisions (P < 0.05). In the "hernia-treatment" experiments, recurrent incisional hernias developed in 86% of control-rod incisions compared with only 23% of bFGF-rod treated incisions (P < 0.05). Immunohistochemistry demonstrated increased angiogenesis and collagen protein production in bFGF treated incisions. CONCLUSION: The treatment of abdominal fascial incisions with a sustained-release bFGF polymer significantly lowered the incidence of incisional hernias and the recurrence rate after repair.     

Repair of recurrent ventral hernias using tissue expansion and porcine acellular dermal matrix

Background

Recurrent ventral hernias are often large and associated with loss of abdominal domain, hindering primary closure. One established intervention for patients with large ventral hernias is the component separation procedure that advances muscle from the lateral abdomen. This technique allows closure without creating tension; however, the relaxing incisions weaken the lateral abdominal wall by altering its natural architecture. We propose an approach to primary midline closure that does not compromise lateral abdominal wall stability and restores the architecture of the abdominal wall while allowing tension-free midline closure.

Methods

In three patients with recurrent ventral hernias who had failed two or more repair attempts, we used a two-stage reconstruction. Bilateral rectangular tissue expanders placed between the external and internal oblique muscles via subcostal incisions were expanded for 6–8 weeks. Second-stage surgery consisted of expander removal and primary closure of the abdominal defect reinforced by an underlay and overlay of noncross-linked intact porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix (PADM; Strattice? Reconstructive Tissue Matrix, LifeCell, Branchburg, NJ, USA).

Results

Primary closure of ventral hernias measuring 8?×?8, 12?×?8, and 8?×?6 cm was achieved with no need for component separation. At follow-up ranging from 10 to 17 months, all patients had structurally intact abdomens with no hernia recurrence and no abdominal wall weakness. All patients have resumed normal daily activities, including returning to work.

Conclusions

Expansion of the external and internal oblique muscles combined with an underlay and overlay of noncross-linked intact PADM allows strong and reliable primary closure of recurrent ventral hernias without the need for component separation. Level of evidence: Level V, therapeutic study     

Repair of Giant Midline Abdominal Wall Hernias: “Components Separation Technique” versus Prosthetic Repair

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of giant midline abdominal wall hernias is difficult, and no data are available to decide which technique should be used. It was the aim of this study to compare the "components separation technique" (CST) versus prosthetic repair with e-PTFE patch (PR). METHOD: Patients with giant midline abdominal wall hernias were randomized for CST or PR. Patients underwent operation following standard procedures. Postoperative morbidity was scored on a standard form, and patients were followed for 36 months after operation for recurrent hernia. RESULTS: Between November 1999 and June 2001, 39 patients were randomized for the study, 19 for CST and 18 for PR. Two patients were excluded perioperatively because of gross contamination of the operative field. No differences were found between the groups at baseline with respect to demographic details, co-morbidity, and size of the defect. There was no in-hospital mortality. Wound complications were found in 10 of 19 patients after CST and 13 of 18 patients after PR. Seroma was found more frequently after PR. In 7 of 18 patients after PR, the prosthesis had to be removed as a consequence of early or late infection. Reherniation occurred in 10 patients after CST and in 4 patients after PR. CONCLUSIONS: Repair of abdominal wall hernias with the component separation technique compares favorably with prosthetic repair. Although the reherniation rate after CST is relatively high, the consequences of wound healing disturbances in the presence of e-PTFE patch are far-reaching, often resulting in loss of the prosthesis.     

Peritoneal approach to prosthetic mesh repair of paraostomy hernias.

A new method for repair of large hernias at stoma sites is presented. The old abdominal incision is reopened and prosthetic mesh is sutured in place aseptically. The bowel courses above the mesh to be secured to the lateral abdominal wall creating a flap valve. Seven paraostomy hernia repairs in six patients were performed with no recurrences in a 4- to 7-year follow-up. The peritoneal approach to insertion of prosthetic mesh into the hernia defect is recommended especially for recurrent paraostomy hernias. This technique is appropriate for a hernia that possesses a large fascial defect.     

Reconstruction of an infected recurrent ventral hernia after a mesh repair using a pedicled tensor fascia lata flap: Report of two cases

Recently, the use of prosthetic mesh has revolutionized the repair of ventral hernias. However, the occurrence of infection related with the use of this prosthesis remains an important complication, which may result in occurrence of fistula formation of the skin or intestine, sepsis, or reoccurrence of ventral hernia. This report presents two cases where a pedicled musculocutaneous flap using the tensor fascia lata (pedicled TFL flap) was effective as a treatment for an infectious large abdominal hernia, and reviews the previous literature. Two Japanese men aged 61 and 78 years old underwent a ventral hernia repair using Composix Kugel mesh. They both developed a wound infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Conservative therapy was not successful and the defect in the abdominal wall of two patients measured 12 × 21 cm and 7 × 10 cm in length, respectively. Reoperations were performed by removing the infectious mesh and then reconstructing the abdominal wall with the bilateral and left-side pedicled TFL flaps, respectively. No recurrence of the ventral hernia has been recognized for 50 months and 7 months after reoperation, respectively. A review of previous studies showed that no patients treated with a pedicled TFL flap experienced a recurrent hernia. Therefore, the pedicled TFL flap was considered to be effective for infectious large abdominal recurrent hernia.     

Complex incisional hernias repaired in conjunction with the Bony Anchoring Reinforcement System (BARS) prevents hernia recurrence

Background

Complex abdominal wall reconstruction and incisional hernia repair have been plagued by high recurrence rates, especially after multiple repair attempts and in those patients with high body mass index. We present an adjunct technique to validated procedures of hernia repair.

Methods

This study is a retrospective analysis of 63 patients between January 2006 and August 2012. Patients had bony suture anchoring of synthetic polypropylene mesh to the anterior superior iliac spine bilaterally, and the pubic symphysis after the abdominal fascia was reconstructed.

Results

Patient mean follow-up was 3.1 years (range 6 months to 6 years). None of the 63 patients had recurrent abdominal wall hernias. One patient, from early in the series, had post-operative bulging, which was retreated successfully using the current revised bone anchoring protocol. Five patients developed mesh infections; none of whom required radical debridement or removal of mesh.

Conclusions

The BARS technique for abdominal wall reconstruction provides an excellent reinforcement of fascial reconstruction with decreased hernia recurrence rates. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.     

Using pedicled TRAM flap in conjunction with the bony anchoring reinforcement system (BARS) for abdominal wall reconstruction

Background

Pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) breast reconstruction is associated with increased abdominal wall morbidity. We present a method of abdominal wall reconstruction using an adjunct technique to validated procedures of hernia repair.

Methods

This study is a retrospective, single-surgeon analysis of 21 patients between 2005 and 2012. Patients had bony suture anchoring of synthetic polypropylene mesh to the anterior superior iliac spine bilaterally and the pubic symphysis after the abdominal fascia was reconstructed.

Results

Patient mean follow-up was 62 months. Of the series, five patients underwent bilateral pedicled TRAM breast reconstruction. None of the 21 patients developed abdominal wall hernias. One patient developed postoperative bulging, which was retreated successfully. Two patients developed mesh infections; none required radical removal of mesh. There were no flap failures or loss in the series.

Conclusions

The BARS technique for abdominal wall reconstruction provides excellent reinforcement of abdominal reconstruction in conjunction with pedicled TRAM breast reconstruction. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.     

The tension-free hernioplasty with a polypropylene endoprosthesis "Esfil" in patients with incarcerated abdominal hernias of great and giant size

In experiments in 24 rabbits it was found that endoprosthesis had no negative effects on the course of the wound process and did not prevent elimination of infection from the wound. "Esfil" was used for plasty of the abdominal wall in 38 patients with incarcerated postoperative, umbilical and inguinal hernias of great and giant sizes. No patient had rejections of the synthetic material, no recurrent hernias during the first year after operation.     

Triple-Step Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair: Midline Suture Closure Supported by Dorsal Component Separation and Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Reinforcement

Incisional hernias remain a surgical challenge when balancing surgical morbidity, functional restoration, and risk of recurrence. Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) placement reduces postoperative wound infections and allows fast patient recovery. Yet, current IPOM techniques do not achieve closure of the midline hernia gap, thereby increasing the risk of persistent mesh bulging with poor abdominal wall function. We propose a novel triple-step hernia repair technique that includes tension-free midline reconstruction. It is achieved through laparoscopic dorsal component separation and laparoscopic suture closure of the midline with a 1.0 polydioxanone suture sling. Combining dorsal abdominal wall component separation, a midline closure with adequate suture strength, and IPOM reinforcement merges the benefits of open and laparoscopic hernia repair. This triple-step technique allows static and functional laparoscopic abdominal wall reconstruction.     

Initial experience with transvaginal incisional hernia repair

Introduction

Natural orifice surgery has evolved from a preclinical setting into a common occurrence at the University of California San Diego (UCSD). With close to 40 transvaginal cases, we have become comfortable with this technique and are exploring other indications. One of the perceived advantages in natural orifice surgery is the potential reduction in the incidence of hernia formation. Patients with abdominal wall hernias may be at increased risk of forming additional hernias at incision sites. In addition, patients with recurrent incisional hernias may, likewise, be at increased risk. We believe that reducing or eliminating abdominal wall incisions may be of benefit in the repair of abdominal wall hernias. Here, we describe what we believe to be the first natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgical (NOTES) approach to the repair of an abdominal wall hernia.

Methods

The patient is a 38-year-old female with a painful recurrent umbilical hernia, previously repaired 8 years prior with a polypropylene-based mesh. The patient underwent a transvaginal recurrent umbilical hernia repair with one other 5-mm port in the abdomen for safety.

Results

The patient had no intraoperative or postoperative complications. At 5 months follow up, the patient had no complaints, no evidence of hernia recurrence, and was very pleased with her result.

Conclusions

The repair of primary and incisional hernias of the ventral abdominal wall via a transvaginal approach is technically feasible, and the result of our initial case was exceptional. However, there are still significant obstacles which must be addressed before this approach can be widely utilized. These obstacles include safe entrance into the abdominal cavity via a transvaginal approach, the proper mesh to be placed during the repair, and the risk of infection.