Early Detection of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection Using Third- and Fourth-Generation Screening Assays

 Early detection of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is critical for clinical diagnosis and treatment of patients, as well as for ensuring the safety of blood transfusion products. Recently, a number of fourth-generation HIV screening assays have been developed that offer increased sensitivity over earlier tests by combining detection of anti-HIV antibodies with detection of the p24 viral antigen. Previously, six different HIV assays were compared against a broad range of 30 seroconversion panels. In the present study, three of the newer fourth-generation assays were tested together with three of the third-generation HIV antibody-only assays. This extensive analysis highlights (i) the importance of p24 antigen detection for early diagnosis, (ii) the improved sensitivity of fourth-generation assays over antibody-only tests, and (iii) the superior performance of the Vidas Duo assay, which allows reduction of the diagnostic window by up to 2 weeks. Finally, the results emphasize the detection limitations of the different assays and suggest improvements for future HIV screening assays.     

Reduction of Diagnostic Window by New Fourth-Generation Human Immunodeficiency Virus Screening Assays

In order to reduce the diagnostic window between the time of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and laboratory diagnosis, new screening enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) which permit the simultaneous detection of HIV antigen and antibody have been developed. Two fourth-generation assays, HIV DUO (Biomérieux) and HIV Combi (Boehringer Mannheim), for the combined detection of HIV antigen and antibody, were compared with a third-generation assay (HIV-1/HIV-2 3rd Generation Plus enzyme immunoassay [EIA]; Abbott) and a p24 antigen test (HIV-1 Ag monoclonal; Abbott). A total of 17 seroconversion panels, 15 cell culture supernatants infected with different HIV type 1 (HIV-1) subtypes, and 255 potentially cross-reactive serum samples were tested. Ten seroconversions were detected an average of 8.1 days earlier with HIV DUO and 7.5 days earlier with HIV Combi than with the third-generation ELISA. Overall, in the 17 seroconversion panels tested, HIV DUO detected HIV-1 infection an average of 4.8 days and HIV Combi detected infection an average of 4.4 days earlier than HIV-1/HIV-2 3rd Generation Plus EIA. HIV antigen was detected with HIV DUO and HIV Combi in all of the 15 cell culture supernatants infected with different HIV-1 subtypes, including subtype O. With fourth-generation assays, considerably fewer false-positive results (n = 4 to 6) were obtained, in comparison with the third-generation EIA (n = 18). Fourth-generation assays permit an earlier diagnosis of HIV infection than third-generation antibody screening assays through the detection of p24 antigen, which may be present in serum samples from individuals with recent HIV infection prior to seroconversion.     

Combination assay detecting both human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) p24 antigen and anti-HIV antibodies opens a second diagnostic window

Fourth-generation human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening immunoassays reduce the diagnostic window between infection and diagnosis by the inclusion of HIV p24 antigen detection together with HIV antibody detection in the same test. We compared third- and fourth-generation HIV immunoassays and a dedicated HIV p24 antigen test for detection of a case of HIV seroconversion. This demonstrated a second diagnostic window using the fourth-generation assay due to a decline of HIV p24 antigen prior to the detection of HIV antibody. However, HIV p24 antigen was detected in the same sample by the dedicated HIV p24 antigen test, as was HIV proviral DNA. Although it is likely to be rare, this phenomenon has also been reported for other fourth-generation HIV immunoassays and has implications for the reported diagnostic windows of these assays.     

Performance evaluation of three automated human immunodeficiency virus antigen-antibody combination immunoassays

Three fourth-generation antigen/antibody combination assays (Elecsys, AxSYM, Architect HIV) and two third-generation (AxSYM, Centaur) HIV antibody immunoassays were evaluated. The evaluation panel of 479 samples included: nine tissue culture derived HIV-1 strains at four different p24 antigen concentrations (n=36), a p24 antigen sensitivity panel (n=10), 149 HIV-1 or HIV-2 confirmed antibody positive samples, ten anti-HIV-1 positive low titer samples, three seroconversion panels (n=21), and 253 HIV negative samples. The Architect had the best sensitivity for detection of HIV-1 antigen across eight HIV-1 subtypes, followed by the AxSYM while the Elecsys could not detect the highest antigen concentration evaluated (25 pg/mL) for eight of nine virus isolates. All assays showed 100% sensitivity for detection of HIV-1, group M, group O, and HIV-2 antibody positive samples. The Architect Ag/Ab Combo assay detected the first positive bleed of the three seroconversion panels and detected infection 4-26 days earlier than the third generation assays. Based on evaluation of 253 negative samples, assay specificity varied from 98.0% to 99.6%. The Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo exhibited the best performance for specificity and detection of p24 antigen leading to closure of seroconversion window and demonstrating its utility for early diagnosis of HIV infection.     

Could the new HIV combined p24 antigen and antibody assays replace p24 antigen specific assays?

The performance of twelve HIV combined p24 antigen and antibody assays available in Europe were compared. The assays were examined with a total of 1983 samples that included 1005 unselected HIV negative samples, 7 HIV-1 p24 Ag reference samples with HIV-1 Ag, 10 samples of a HIV antigen sensitivity commercial panel, 124 samples of 31 p24 antigen panels of different HIV-1 subtypes, 168 members of 24 HIV-1 seroconversion panels, 559 HIV-1 (groups M and O) antibody positive samples and 110 HIV-2 antibody positive samples. The specificity ranged from 99.4 to 100%. Ten of the 12 assays detected all anti-HIV positive samples irrespective of genotype while two assays missed one sample each (one subtype F and one subtype C). The combined assays could be classified into three groups. The first includes two assays (Enzygnost HIV Integral and Vironostika Ag/Ab) that have a clinical sensitivity similar to the two antibody only assays. The second includes the seven assays that detected infection after the p24 antigen only assay and show a delay from 3.3 to 5.17 days after HIV-1 RNA. The third group detected the infection before the p24 antigen assay and less than 3 days after nucleic acid testing (NAT). The improved ability to detect p24 Ag, at levels similar to specific HIV Ag assays, suggests that these new HIV combined Ag/Ab assays could replace p24 antigen only assays in situations for blood or organ screening when NAT is not feasible or not affordable.     

Clinical Evaluation of BioPlex 2200 HIV Ag-Ab,an Automated Screening Method Providing Discrete Detection of HIV-1 p24 Antigen,HIV-1 Antibody,and HIV-2 Antibody

Early and accurate diagnosis is essential for optimal therapeutic outcomes in patients infected with HIV. Currently, none of the commercially available fourth-generation assays differentiate HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies (Ab) or the HIV-1 p24 antigen (Ag). The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a novel assay, the BioPlex 2200 HIV Ag-Ab. This assay uses a multiplex flow immunoassay design allowing the simultaneous detection and identification of antibodies to HIV-1 (groups M and O), HIV-2, and the HIV-1 p24 antigen, in addition to providing a traditional composite result. A total of 1,505 routine serum samples were prospectively tested. Results were compared with those from the Architect HIV Combo assay. The sensitivity of the BioPlex 2200 was 100%. The specificity assessed on repeated false-positive samples was 99.5%. In addition, 524 frozen specimens from patients known to be infected with HIV-1 or HIV-2 were tested. Of these specimens, 420 were infected with HIV-1, including 156 of known genotypes, 86 were infected with HIV-2, 7 were infected with HIV-1 and HIV-2, and 11 were from patients with acute HIV infection. Sensitivity was 100% for the HIV genotypes tested. The differentiation capabilities of the BioPlex 2200 HIV Ag-Ab assay for HIV-1, HIV-2, dual HIV-1/HIV-2, and early infections were 100%, 90.7%, 100%, and 90.9%, respectively. The BioPlex 2200 is a sensitive and specific assay that offers advantages over conventional HIV combo assays, also referred to as fourth-generation assays, to accurately differentiate and report HIV-1 p24 antigen and HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies.     

Multicenter evaluation of a new rapid automated human immunodeficiency virus antigen detection assay

Although human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antigen assays are of limited value for monitoring antiretroviral therapy, they play an important role for confirmatory testing of fourth generation HIV screening enzyme immunoassay (EIA) reactive samples. In a multicenter study, a new automated rapid p24 antigen assay, Elecsys HIV Ag (Roche Diagnostics Boehringer Mannheim GmbH, Penzberg, Germany), was compared to FDA licensed tests (Abbott HIV-1 Ag monoclonal and Coulter HIV-1 p24 antigen assay). In the evaluation 27 seroconversion panels were included, sera from the acute phase of infection, single and follow-up samples from HIV antibody positive patients, dilution series of HIV antigen positive standards, sera and cell culture supernatants infected with different HIV-1 subtypes (A-H, and O) HIV-2 and recombinant HIV-1 (gag/env) isolates. To challenge the specificity of the new assay, 2565 unselected blood donors, sera from pregnant women, dialysis and hospitalized patients and 407 potentially cross-reactive samples were investigated. Acute HIV infection was detected in three to eight seroconversion panels earlier with Elecsys HIV Ag than with the alternative assays. Higher numbers of serum samples from HIV infected patients tested positive by Elecsys HIV Ag than with the comparative assays. All HIV-1 subtypes and HIV-2 isolates were recognized with Elecsys HIV Ag. Abbott HIV-1 Ag monoclonal and Coulter HIV-1 p24 antigen assay showed a variable sensitivity for the different HIV-1 subtypes. The specificity of Elecsys HIV Ag and Coulter HIV-1 p24 antigen assay were 99.8 and 99.93%, respectively. All the eight sera that were false reactive by Elecsys HIV Ag were tested negative with the Elecsys HIV Ag Neutralization Test. In conclusion, Elecsys HIV Ag was more sensitive than the alternative assays and showed a high specificity in combination with the neutralization assay. The very short incubation time of 18 min and the fully automated procedure of Elecsys HIV Ag which permits direct testing from the primary patient blood collection tube, represent a major improvement for routine laboratory diagnosis in comparison to the alternative assays.     

Place des tests combinés dans le diagnostic biologique de l'infection par les virus de l'immunodéficience humaine

Combined tests for screening of HIV infection. Since 1985, screening tests for human immunodeficiency (HIV) antibodies have improved. Replacement of viral lysat by recombinant proteins and synthetic peptides has increased sensitivity and specificity. In parallel, more and more sensitive screening tests for p24 HIV1 antigen (p24Ag) appear. Lastly, emergence of nucleic acid tests change the diagnostic strategy and follow-up of infected patients. Nevertheless, serology remains in the diagnostic of a HIV infection, particularly in a recently primary infection. Combined tests which screened HIV antibodies and detected HIV1 p24Ag are made on proved technology easily used in laboratory. They present a similar sensitivity that the classical non combined HIV antibodies screening tests. Improvements remain necessary in term of specificity and detection of HIV1p24 Ag.     

Avidity Index for anti-HIV antibodies: comparison between third- and fourth-generation automated immunoassays

The development of assays for detecting recent HIV infections has become crucial for analyzing trends in infection in different populations, both for surveillance and prevention activities. The anti-HIV avidity index (AI), measured with third-generation immunoassays (which detect anti-HIV antibody), has been shown to be an accurate tool for discriminating recent HIV infections (<6 months) from established infections (≥ 6 months). We compared a third-generation immunoassay (AxSYM HIV 1/2 gO; Abbott Diagnostics) to a fourth-generation immunoassay (Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo; Abbott Diagnostics; which detects anti-HIV antibody and p24 antigen) in terms of AI performance in distinguishing between recent and established HIV infections. A total of 142 samples from 75 HIV-infected individuals with an estimated date of seroconversion were assayed. The two assays showed the same accuracy in identifying a recent infection (91.5%), using an AI cutoff of 0.80, although Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo was slightly more sensitive (89.4% versus 84.8%; P > 0.05) and yet less specific (93.4% versus 97.4%; P > 0.05). The correlation between assays was high (r = 0.87). When 20 specimens falling in the gray zone around the cutoff point (0.75 ≤ AI ≤ 0.84) were excluded, the accuracy of AI with Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo was 94.7%, and the concordance between the two assays was 99.2%. The anti-HIV AI is a serological marker that accurately discriminates recent from established HIV infections. It can be successfully applied on fully automated fourth-generation HIV Ab/Ag immunoassays, which have several advantages, including increased throughput, high reproducibility, no need for specific technical skills, and easy comparability of results obtained in different settings.     

Analytical sensitivity of four HIV combined antigen/antibody assays using the p24 WHO standard

BackgroundThe Common Technical Specifications for HIV-1 p24 assays published in 2009 fixed the lower limit of detection for obtaining C.E. approval at 2 IU/ml against the WHO standard (first international reference, code NIBSC 90/636); it was previously 50 pg/ml. Some recent fourth generation HIV assays that simultaneously detect antigen and antibody are equivalent to p24 assays, but they were mainly evaluated using p24 antigen standards in pg/ml and little is known of their performance with the IU/ml standard.ObjectivesTo evaluate four of the combined serological assays most commonly used for HIV diagnosis in France against the WHO standard in IU/ml.Study designThe analytical sensitivity of four combined p24 antigen and antibody assays (ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo, AxSYM HIV Ag/Ab Combo, VIDAS HIV DUO Quick and VIDAS HIV DUO Ultra) and of one p24 assay (VIDAS HIV p24 II) were determined using dilutions of the WHO standard.ResultsFour of the five assays had a lower limit of detection below 2 IU/ml: 1.24 for ARCHITECT Combo, 0.66 for VIDAS DUO Ultra, 0.43 for VIDAS DUO Quick and 0.73 to 1.15 for VIDAS p24, while that of AxSYM was close to 2 (1.94–2.25).ConclusionsWe have provided the first data on the lower limit of detection of HIV combined assays using the IU/ml WHO standard and demonstrated the need for a single international standard for comparing assays. We recommend the use of this approach in medical laboratory to validate on site their methods.     

Fourth-Generation Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for the Simultaneous Detection of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Antigen and Antibody

The VIDAS HIV DUO Ultra, a fourth-generation immunoassay under development for the simultaneous detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) p24 antigen and antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2, was evaluated. The enzyme-linked fluorescence immunoassay, performed on the automated VIDAS instrument, is claimed to detect early and established HIV infection. The assay was challenged with a total of 2,847 samples that included 74 members of 10 seroconversion panels, 9 p24 antigen-only-reactive members of a panel of group M clades, 503 consecutively collected samples from individuals seeking care in the University of Maryland Medical System, 1,010 samples from U.S. blood donors, 1,141 samples from patients in a high-incidence population in Trinidad, 83 samples from a clinic for sexually transmitted diseases in the Bahamas, 10 confirmed HIV-1 group O samples, and 16 confirmed HIV-2 samples from the Cote d'Ivoire. Reference tests were U.S. Food and Drug Administration-licensed HIV antibody screening, p24 antigen tests, HIV confirmatory assays, and the Roche Diagnostics Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor. The VIDAS HIV DUO Ultra demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 99.5% specificity overall, with a 99.7% specificity in low-risk individuals. The analytical sensitivity, as assessed by seroconversion panels and p24 antigen in samples, was equivalent to the sensitivity of the reference assays used to characterize these panels. The VIDAS HIV DUO Ultra is accurate, offers potential advantages over conventional HIV testing for time and cost savings, has walk-away capability, and correctly identifies both early and established HIV infections.     

Comparative evaluation of TRI-DOT Rapid HIV test with fourth-generation ELISA for the detection of human immunodeficiency virus

This study evaluated the TRI-DOT Rapid HIV test for the early detection of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in comparison with a fourth-generation ELISA (Vironostika HIV Uniform II). Of 23,609 sera, seven (0.03%) gave discordant results. Six of these were reactive only by the fourth-generation assay and were p24 antigen-positive by VIDAS DUO, Western blot and qualitative RT-PCR tests. The remaining discordant serum was considered to be false-positive by the TRI-DOT assay, as it was negative by repeat ELISA and Western blot tests. The sensitivity and specificity of the TRI-DOT test were 99.48% and 99.99%, respectively, compared with the fourth-generation ELISA.     

Performances of four fourth‐generation human immunodeficiency virus‐1 screening assays

Fourth‐generation human immunodeficiency virus‐1 (HIV‐1) screening assays have improved sensitivity, but vary in performance characteristics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate four different fourth‐generation HIV‐1 assays. These assays included the AxSYM HIV Ag/Ab Combo (Abbott diagnostics, Delkenheim, Germany), ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo (Abbott), Elecsys 2010 HIV Combi (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), and Elecsys HIV Combi PT (Roche). A total of 1,306 samples that included 1,225 clinical samples and 81 samples consisting of seroconversion panels, an HIV‐1 p24 antigen sensitivity panel, and dilution series of HIV‐1 lysates and HIV‐1 antibodies were tested. All of the assays had sensitivities of 100% on clinical samples. The specificities of the AxSYM, ARCHITECT, Elecsys 2010 HIV Combi, and Elecsys HIV Combi PT were 99.6, 99.6, 99.0, and 99.5%, respectively. Of the 81 samples with different levels of HIV antigen or antibody and/or subtypes, Elecsys HIV Combi PT and ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo showed better analytical sensitivities than the other two assays. In summary, the performance characteristics of AxSYM, ARCHITECT, and Elecsys HIV Combi PT were comparable and satisfactory for clinical samples. ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo and Elecsys HIV Combi PT have the higher analytical sensitivities, and would be preferable for reducing the window period. J. Med. Virol. 84:1884–1888, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Sensitivity of screening kits for anti-HIV antibodies. 1999 update. Retrovirus Working Group of the French Society for Blood Transfusion]

A comparative evaluation of the sensitivity of anti-HIV screening assays has been recently performed with a selected panel of 65 samples which included HIV1 group M (per-seroconversions, seroconversions and seropositives infected with genotypes A, B, C, D, E), HIV1 group O and HIV2. The results obtained with the 21 ELISA HIV1 + HIV2 screening assays are presented. Among these 21 assays, four are combined anti-HIV and p24 Ag assays. All the assays except four fulfilled the criteria defined at the beginning of the study, i.e., positive results on all the seropositives including seroconversions and positive results on at least 50% of the per-seroconversions. The main differences were observed with the ten per-seroconversion samples, the number of positive results on such samples varying from three to ten. The constant improvement of anti-HIV screening tests which leads one to shorten the 'window' period permits and earlier diagnosis of HIV infection and a progressive decrease of the transfusional risk.     

Shortening of the diagnostic window with a new combined HIV p24 antigen and anti-HIV-1/2/O screening test

Because antibodies to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are absent in the very early phase of HIV infection, there remains a slight residual risk for HIV transmission by blood donations by viremic but antibody negative donations. To shorten the diagnostic window between infection and the detection of antibodies, Enzygnost® HIV Integral (Dade Behring, Germany) was developed. With this new test, HIV p24 antigen and HIV antibodies can be detected simultaneously in a single test. In a multicenter study the new screening assay has been compared with various tests that detect only HIV antibodies or HIV p24 antigen and with assays which permit a simultaneous detection of HIV antigen and HIV antibodies. The new assay showed 100% sensitivity for the detection of antibodies to HIV-1, groups M (n=1102) and O (n=55), and HIV-2 (n=289). In 23 out of 52 seroconversion panels, seroconversion was detected 2–18 days earlier with the new combined antigen/antibody test compared to single antibody tests. All samples from a viral load panel (n=451), all samples containing p24 antigen (n=302), and all but one of the cell culture supernatants (n=38) infected with various HIV-1 subtypes or HIV-2 were identified reliably by the new test. The specificity of the assay for 4002 unselected blood donors was 99.78% initially and 99.80% after retesting. Potentially interfering factors had no systematic influence on specificity. By testing for p24 antigen, which is present prior to the onset of antibody production in some cases of recent HIV infection, the new assay reduces the diagnostic window as compared to third generation screening assays, thus permitting an earlier diagnosis of HIV infection.     

New Automated Chemiluminescence Immunoassay for Simultaneous but Separate Detection of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Antigens and Antibodies

The recently launched Liaison XL Murex HIV Ab/Ag assay (DiaSorin S.p.A) uses chemiluminescence immunoassay technology for the combined qualitative determination of p24 antigen of HIV-1 and specific antibodies to both HIV-1 and HIV-2. We studied 571 serum samples from those submitted to our laboratory for HIV screening. The samples were divided into 3 subsets: subset A, 365 samples collected prospectively during 1 week; subset B, 158 samples from confirmed HIV-positive patients; and subset C, 48 samples with a positive screening result but a negative or indeterminate confirmatory test result. Our standard screening/confirmatory algorithm was used as a reference. In subset A (prospective), 5 samples were positive and 360 negative by the standard procedure. Liaison XL Murex HIV Ab/Ag correctly identified all 5 positive samples (100%) and 357 negative samples (99.2%). In subset B (confirmed positive), all 158 positive samples were in total agreement in both procedures. In subset C (screen positive only), Liaison XL Murex HIV Ab/Ag yielded accurate results in 42 out of 48 samples (87.5%). Global sensitivity and specificity for Liaison XL Murex HIV Ab/Ag (all subsets included) were 98.3% and 98.5%, respectively. Considering only nonselected prospective samples and confirmed positive samples (subsets A and B), the corresponding sensitivity and specificity values were 100% and 99.2%, respectively. The new fully automated HIV screening test showed high sensitivity and specificity compared to our standard algorithm. Its added advantage of being able to detect HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies and p24 antigen separately could prove useful in the diagnosis of early infections.     

Seven human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antigen-antibody combination assays: evaluation of HIV seroconversion sensitivity and subtype detection

In this study, we evaluated the performance of two prototype human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antigen-antibody (Ag-Ab) combination assays, one from Abbott Laboratories (AxSYM HIV Ag-Ab) and the other from bioMerieux (VIDAS HIV Duo Ultra), versus five combination assays commercially available in Europe. The assays were Enzygnost HIV Integral, Genscreen Plus HIV Ag-Ab, Murex HIV Ag-Ab Combination, VIDAS HIV Duo, and Vironostika HIV Uniform II Ag-Ab. All assays were evaluated for the ability to detect p24 antigen from HIV-1 groups M and O, antibody-positive plasma samples from HIV-1 groups M and O, HIV-2, and 19 HIV seroconversion panels. Results indicate that although all combination assays can detect antibodies to HIV-1, group M, subtypes A to G, circulating recombinant form (CRF) A/E, and HIV-1 group O, their sensitivity varied considerably when tested using diluted HIV-1 group O and HIV-2 antibody-positive samples. Among combination assays, the AxSYM, Murex, and VIDAS HIV Duo Ultra assays exhibited the best antigen sensitivity (at approximately 25 pg of HIV Ag/ml) for detection of HIV-1 group M, subtypes A to G and CRF A/E, and HIV-1 group O isolates. However, the VIDAS HIV Duo Ultra assay had a lower sensitivity for HIV-1 group M and subtype C, and was unable to detect subtype C antigen even at 125 pg of HIV Ag/ml. The HIV antigen sensitivity of the VIDAS HIV Duo and Genscreen Plus combination assays was approximately 125 pg of HIV Ag/ml for detection of all HIV-1 group M isolates except HIV-1 group O while the sensitivity of Vironostika HIV Uniform II Ag-Ab and Enzygnost HIV Integral Ag-Ab assays for all the group M subtypes was >125 pg of HIV Ag/ml. Among the combination assays, the AxSYM assay had the best performance for detection of early seroconversion samples, followed by the Murex and VIDAS HIV Duo Ultra assays.     

Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of six HIV combined p24 antigen and antibody assays

In this study, we evaluated the performance of six HIV combined p24 antigen and antibody (Ag/Ab) assays versus two third-generation anti-HIV antibody assays. The assays were evaluated using p24 antigen panel of 31 HIV-1 subtypes (n = 124), 25 HIV-1 seroconversion panels (n = 176), HIV-1 antibody positive samples including group M subtypes and group O (n = 559), HIV-2 positive samples (n = 110), and unselected HIV negative samples from four French private laboratories (n = 1005). The results showed that overall HIV combined Ag/Ab assays present better performance, when compared to antibody-only assays. However, some differences were observed in the sensitivity of the six HIV combined Ag/Ab assays evaluated. The AxSYM and Murex Combo assays had the best sensitivity score in this study and reduced the window period by 2.0-2.35 days relative to antibody only assays and 1-2.17 days relative to the other combined Ag/Ab assays. Among combined HIV Ag/Ab assays, Genscreen Plus and AxSYM Combo presented the highest specificity, with 99.9% and 99.8%, respectively.