Cardiac valve replacement in patients on dialysis: influence of prosthesis on survival

BACKGROUND: Mechanical valves have been recommended for patients on dialysis because of purported accelerated bioprosthesis degeneration. This study was undertaken to determine time-related outcomes in dialysis patients requiring cardiac valve replacement. METHODS: From 1986 to 1998, 42 patients on chronic preoperative dialysis underwent valve replacement; 17 received mechanical valves and 25 received bioprostheses. Age was similar in both groups: 54+/-18.5 years (mechanical) and 59+/-15.5 years (bioprosthetic, p = 0.4). Sites of valve replacement were aortic (27), mitral (11), and aortic and mitral (4). Follow-up was 100% complete. RESULTS: Survival at 3 and 5 years was 50% and 33% after mechanical valve replacement, and 36% and 27% after bioprosthetic valve replacement (p = 0.3). Four patients with bioprostheses required reoperation: 3 for allograft endocarditis and 1 at 10 months for mitral bioprosthesis degeneration. One patient who received a mechanical valve required reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Prosthetic valve-related complications in patients on dialysis were similar for both mechanical and bioprosthetic valves. Because of the limited life expectancy of patients on dialysis, bioprosthesis degeneration will be uncommon. Therefore, surgeons should not hesitate to implant bioprosthetic valves in these patients.     

Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.

OBJECTIVES: Reoperation is a relatively common event in patients with prosthetic heart valves, but its actual occurrence can vary widely from one patient to another. With a focus on bioprosthetic valves, this study examines risk factors for reoperation in a large patient cohort. METHODS: Patients (N=3233) who underwent a total of 3633 operations for aortic (AVR) or mitral valve replacement (MVR) between 1970 and 2002 were prospectively followed (total 21,179 patient-years; mean 6.6+/-5.0 years; maximum 32.4 years). The incidence of prosthetic valve reoperation and the impact of patient- and valve-related variables were determined with actual and actuarial methods. RESULTS: Fifteen-year actual freedom from all-cause reoperation was 94.1% for aortic mechanical valves, 61.4% for aortic bioprosthetic valves, 94.8% for mitral mechanical valves, and 63.3% for mitral bioprosthetic valves. In both aortic and mitral positions, current bioprosthesis models had significantly better durability than discontinued bioprostheses (15-year reoperation odds-ratio 0.11+/-0.04; P<0.01 for aortic, and 0.42+/-0.14; P=0.009 for mitral). Current bioprostheses were significantly more durable in the aortic position than in the mitral position (14.3+/-6.8% more freedom from 15-year reoperation; (P=0.018)). Older age was protective, but smoking was an independent risk factor for reoperation after bioprosthetic AVR and MVR (hazard ratio for smoking 2.58 and 1.78, respectively). In patients with aortic bioprostheses, persistent left ventricular hypertrophy at follow-up and smaller prosthesis size predicted an increased incidence of reoperation, while this was not observed in patients with mitral bioprostheses. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses indicate that current bioprostheses have significantly better durability than discontinued bioprostheses, reveal a detrimental impact for smoking after AVR and MVR, and indicate an increased reoperation risk in patients with a small aortic bioprosthesis or with persistent left ventricular hypertrophy after AVR.     

Mitral valve repair and replacement for rheumatic disease

OBJECTIVES: Mitral valve repair may be technically feasible in patients with suitable anatomy, but the appropriateness of repair for rheumatic disease remains controversial. We evaluated our late outcomes after mitral repair and replacement for rheumatic disease. METHODS: Five hundred seventy-three patients underwent mitral valve surgery for rheumatic disease at our institution from 1978-1995. Follow-up was 98% complete (mean, 68 +/- 46 months). Survival and morbidity were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression, including propensity score analysis. RESULTS: Mean age was 54 +/- 14 years, 55% of patients had congestive heart failure, 22% were undergoing redo mitral valve surgery, and 9% also underwent coronary bypass. Mitral stenosis was present in 53%, regurgitation in 15%, and both in 32%. Valve repair was performed in 25%, bioprosthetic replacement was performed in 28%, and a mechanical valve was placed in 47%. Patients undergoing repair were younger and less likely to be undergoing reoperation or to have atrial fibrillation than those undergoing replacement (P =.001). The operative mortality rate was 4. 2%. Better late cardiac survival was independently predicted by valve repair rather than replacement (P =.04) after adjustment for baseline differences between patients. Freedom from reoperation was greatest (P =.005) but that from thromboembolic complications was worst (P <.0001) after mechanical valve replacement. Twenty-three patients underwent reoperation after initial repair, with no operative deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical valves minimize reoperation but limit survival and increase thromboembolic complications. Patients undergoing valve repair had improved late cardiac survival independent of their preoperative characteristics. Rheumatic mitral valves should be repaired when technically feasible, accepting a risk of reoperation, to maximize survival and reduce morbidity.     

Prosthetic valve replacement in children

Between 1975 and 1998, 27 patients aged 3 months to 14 years underwent replacement of the aortic, mitral, tricuspid, and pulmonary valves. Five different types of prosthetic valves were used; three were mechanical valves and two were bioprosthetic valves. There were 3 hospital deaths. Among the 24 survivors there were 4 late deaths. Arrhythmia requiring pacemaker implantation occurred in 2 cases after AVR and TVR. Thromboembolic events occurred in 3 patients, all with mechanical valves in pulmonary position. Infective endocarditis occurred in 1 patient after PVR with a mechanical valve. No bleeding complication occurred among the patients on a regimen of Coumadin and Dipyridamole. Two patients, both with Hancock bioprosthesis, required a second valve replacement on account of severely calcified changes. Mechanical valves in left side heart had a satisfactory long-term performance. One patient who had undergone MVR for congenital parachute mitral valve received reoperation for growth. A larger sized prosthetic valve should be used at the first replacement, and special procedures including supra-annular positioning or annular augmentation are recommended for MVR or AVR respectively.     

Long-term results of porcine bioprosthetic valves

Between November 1977 and October 1980, 54 patients underwent valve replacements with porcine bioprostheses at Hyogo Kenritsu Amagasaki Hospital. The late complications and the long term durability of 53 porcine bioprostheses were documented in 48 patients after discharge (34 mitral, 7 aortic, 2 tricuspid, and 5 multiple, consisting of 38 Hancock, 15 Carpentier-Edwards prostheses). Cumulative duration of follow-up is 420 patient-years. The valve related late mortality was 0.52%/patient-years. There were 6 thromboembolic events (1.6% patient-years), only 1 episode of endocarditis (0.26%/patient-years). Valve dysfunction is defined as stenosis or regurgitation by echocardiogram or cardiac catheterization. There were 21 instances of porcine bioprosthetic dysfunction (6.6% patient-years). Freedom from valve dysfunction at 12 years was 24.4%. There were 17 valves of mitral bioprosthetic dysfunction (6.4% patient-years). The incidences of mitral stenosis (MS), mitral regurgitation (MR), and paravalvular leakage were 4.5, 3.6, and 0.7%/patient-years respectively. Freedom from MR was higher than MS at 8 years. The 14 patients were needed reoperation due to valve dysfunction (3.6%/patient-years). We concluded that the porcine bioprostheses showed a high incidence of valve dysfunction at 7 to 8 years after operation, we presently choose mechanical valve in most cases.     

Valve replacement in children

Between May 1979 and September 1998, 202 children underwent surgical treatment for valvular heart disease. Of these 23, who ranged in age from 25 days to 15 years, underwent valve replacement, including 1 reoperation. The valve replacement consisted of the aortic valve in 5 patients, the mitral valve in 3, the tricuspid valves in 9, including 5 systemic atrioventricular valves for atrioventricular discordance, the pulmonary valve in 6, 5 bioprostheses and 18 mechanical prostheses. There were 4 operative deaths, 1 hospital death and 3 late deaths. At the 10-years follow-up, the actual survival rate was 67.8%, the event free rate was 76.1% and the freedom from reoperation rate was 86.2%. Valve re-replacement was performed in only 1 patient due to a thrombosed tricuspid valve. These results suggest that there is a small risk of major complications and reoperation in children who undergo valve replacement, whether a bioprosthetic valve or a mechanical valve. The long-term results of younger patients should be followed more closely according to their growth.     

Mitral Valve Replacement with the Hancock Bioprosthesis: Five- to Ten-Year Follow-up

One hundred eleven patients undergoing mitral valve replacement, either alone (56) or in conjunction with another type of prosthetic valve, prior to 1975 were evaluated. Hospital mortality was 9.9%. Cumulative follow-up is 505 patient-years (mean, 5.4 years). Seventy patients have been followed between 5 and 10 years. Late mortality for mitral valve replacement alone is 4.3 ± 1.3% per patient-year; actuarial survival is 82 ± 6% at 5 years and 65 ± 11% at 10 years. The incidence of emboli was 3.3 ± 0.9% per patient-year for all patients with bioprostheses (62) and 4.2 ± 1.7% per patient-year for bioprostheses and concomitant mechanical aortic valves (32). In patients with only bioprostheses, two of twelve emboli occurred within the first 6 postoperative months and there were three fatal cerebral emboli (0.8 + 0.5% per patient-year). The incidence of hemorrhagic complications is 4.9 ± 1.9% for anticoagulated patients with bioprostheses and mechanical aortic valves; one hemorrhage was fatal (0.7 ± 0.7% per patient-year). Intrinsic mitral bioprosthesis failure occurred in 10 patients; 2 died. Five patients had valve failure secondary to perivalvular regurgitation (3) or endocarditis (2). Actuarial late survival free from intrinsic mitral bioprosthetic failure was 99 ± 1% at 5 years, 92 ± 4% at 7 years, 70 ± 12% at 9 years, and 61 ± 13% at 10 years.It is unknown at the present time whether the long-term risk of late intrinsic valve failure and reoperation will outweigh the low incidence of emboli and avoidance of anticoagulant-related hemorrhage. Until further information becomes available, the Hancock bioprosthesis is used for mitral valve replacement only in patients older than 60 years or in patients with contraindications for anticoagulant therapy.     

Risk of Reoperative Valve Replacement for Failed Mitral and Aortic Bioprostheses

Background. One factor influencing the choice of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves is reoperation for bioprosthetic valve failure. To define its operative risk, we reviewed our results with valve reoperation for bioprosthetic valve failure.

Methods. Records of 400 consecutive patients having reoperative mitral, aortic, or mitral and aortic bioprosthetic valve replacement from January 1985 to March 1997 were reviewed.

Results. Reoperations were for failed bioprosthetic mitral valves in 219 patients, failed aortic valves in 153 patients, and failed aortic and mitral valves in 28 patients. Including 26 operations (6%) for acute endocarditis, 153 operations (38%) were nonelective. One hundred nine patients (27%) had other valves repaired or replaced, and 72 (18%) had coronary bypass grafting. The incidence of death in the mitral, aortic, and double-valve groups was respectively, 15 (6.8%), 12 (7.8%), and 4 (14.3%); and the incidence of prolonged postoperative hospital stay (>14 days) was, respectively, 57 (26.0%), 41 (26.8%), and 8 (28.6%). Only 7 of 147 patients (4.8%) having elective, isolated, first-time valve reoperation died. Multivariable predictors (p < 0.05) of hospital death were age greater than 65 years, male sex, renal insufficiency, and nonelective operation; and predictors of prolonged stay were acute endocarditis, renal insufficiency, any concurrent cardiac operation, and elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure.

Conclusions. Reoperative bioprosthetic valve replacement can be performed with acceptable mortality and hospital stay. The best results are achieved with elective valve replacement, without concurrent cardiac procedures.     

Results of reoperation for primary tissue failure of porcine bioprostheses

Results of reoperation for primary tissue failure of porcine bioprostheses were evaluated in 574 patients discharged from the hospital from 1970 to 1981. A total of 413 had undergone isolated mitral valve replacement and 161 isolated aortic valve replacement. Through March, 1984, 88 patients (15%) had required reoperation: 59 had undergone mitral and 29, aortic valve replacement. Primary tissue failure was the main cause of bioprosthetic dysfunction; it occurred in 64 patients (46 mitral and 18 aortic) at a mean postoperative interval of 93 +/- 4 months (range 34 to 158). During the same period, 11 patients required reoperation for bioprosthetic endocarditis, 11 for paravalvular leak, and two for thrombosis. These patients are not included in this review. Reoperation for primary tissue failure was performed after a mean interval of 72 +/- 6 months (range 38 to 158) for patients with aortic bioprostheses and after 101 +/- 5 months (range 34 to 153) for those with mitral bioprostheses (p less than 0.05). Overall mortality at reoperation was 12.5%: 11% for the mitral group and 16% for the aortic group. In 62 patients (45 mitral and 17 aortic) primary tissue failure was caused by calcification of the cusps, associated with severe fibrous tissue overgrowth in seven. Bioprosthetic failure was caused by an intracuspal hematoma in one patient with mitral valve replacement and by lipid infiltration of the cusps in one patient with aortic valve replacement. Actuarial freedom from bioprosthetic primary tissue failure at 12 years is 61% +/- 5% for the mitral group and 69% +/- 7% for the aortic group. On the basis of our long-term follow-up of patients after mitral or aortic replacement with a porcine bioprosthesis, we conclude: primary tissue failure is the most frequent indication for reoperation in patients with a porcine bioprosthesis; calcification of the cusp tissue is the leading cause of primary tissue failure; reoperation for primary tissue failure may be a major concern, although mortality for elective cases is low; and the limited durability of porcine bioprostheses suggests their use be restricted to selected patients.     

Reoperative surgery for degenerated aortic bioprostheses: predictors for emergency surgery and reoperative mortality.

OBJECTIVE: The long-term outcome of patients with aortic bioprosthetic valves could be improved by decreasing the reoperative mortality rate. METHODS: Predictors of emergency reoperation and reoperative mortality were identified retrospectively in 172 patients who had the first bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement between 1975 and 1988 (mean age 46+/-13 years) and were subjected to replacement of the degenerated bioprostheses between 1978 and 1997 (mean age 56+/-14 years). Emergency reoperation had to be performed in 31 patients (18%). RESULTS: The operative mortality was 5.2% (9/172), 22.6% for emergency (odds ratio 11.17; 95%-confidence limit 4.33-28.85) and 1.4% for elective replacement of the degenerated aortic bioprosthesis (P<0.0001; OR=20.3). Patients who died at reoperation had higher transvalvular gradients before the primary aortic valve replacement (P=0.007), received smaller bioprostheses at the first operation (P=0.03), had later recurrence of symptoms after the first aortic valve replacement (P=0.04), a higher pre-reoperative New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (P=0.02), and a higher incidence of coronary artery disease (P=0.001) and pulmonary artery hypertension (P=0.009). Endocarditis before the primary aortic valve replacement (P=0.004), postoperative pneumonia at the first operation (P=0.005), pulmonary hypertension (P=0.0004) acquired during the interval, later recurrence of symptoms (P=0.04) after the first operation, a lower ejection fraction at the time of reoperation (P=0.03) and acute onset of bioprosthetic regurgitation (P=0.00002) were predictors for emergency surgery. Higher transvalvular gradients at the primary aortic valve replacement (P=0. 006), coronary artery disease (P=0.003) acquired during the interval, the need for concomitant coronary artery revascularization (P=0. 001), sex (P=0.02) and size (P=0.05) and type of the bioprostheses used (P=0.007) were incremental predictors for reoperative mortality which were independent of emergency surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Elective replacement of failed aortic bioprostheses is safe. Patients undergoing emergency reoperation have a considerably higher mortality. They can be identified by a history of native aortic valve endocarditis, higher transvalvular gradients at primary aortic valve replacement, smaller bioprostheses, and pulmonary hypertension or coronary artery disease acquired during the interval. A failing bioprosthesis must be replaced at its first sign of dysfunction.     

Long-term follow-up of cardiac valve replacement using bioprosthesis in patients 70 years old and older

Good long-term results with the bioprosthetic valves for patients 70 years old and older have been reported. However, because the average lifespan is increasing, we aimed to clarify whether patients older than 70 may still be candidates for valve re-replacement. Seventy-one patients 70 years old and older, who received a total of 81 bioprosthetic valve replacements during 73 procedures between 1988 and 2000, were reviewed. There were 8 hospital and 7 late deaths. Ten-year actual survival after valve replacement was 73.5%, and 82.8% when hospital deaths were excluded. During the follow-up period, 2 patients received mitral valve re-replacement. Ten years of freedom from reoperation were found in 66.7% for all valves and in 50.0% for mitral valves. The average lifespan in Japan is currently 77.64 years for men and 84.62 years for women; therefore, valve degeneration in patients who receive bioprosthesis replacement in their early 70s should be anticipated.     

Tricuspid valve replacement: an analysis of 25 years of experience at a single center

BACKGROUND: Tricuspid valve replacement is seldom used in clinical practice, but the choice between mechanical and biologic prostheses remains controversial. METHODS: Between 1977 and 2002, 97 patients underwent tricuspid valve replacement and were followed at the Montreal Heart Institute Valve Clinic. Patients underwent replacement with bioprostheses (n = 82) and mechanical valves (n = 15). RESULTS: Patients with bioprosthetic tricuspid replacements averaged 53 +/- 13 years of age compared with 48 +/- 11 years in those with tricuspid mechanical valve replacements (p = 0.2). Isolated tricuspid valve replacement was performed in 11 patients (73%) in the mechanical valve group compared with 31 patients (38%. p = 0.01) in the bioprosthetic replacement group. In patients undergoing bioprosthetic tricuspid replacement, 51 (62%) underwent multiple associated valve replacements. The 5-year survival after tricuspid replacement averaged 60% +/- 13% in the mechanical valve group and 56% +/- 6% in the biologic replacement group (p = 0.8). The 5-year freedom rate from tricuspid valve reoperation averaged 91% +/- 9% in patients with mechanical valves and 97% +/- 3% in those with biologic valves (p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS; Patient survival after tricuspid valve replacement is suboptimal but related to the clinical condition at operation. The use of biologic prostheses for tricuspid valve replacement remains a good option in young patients because of limited life expectancy unrelated to the type of tricuspid prostheses at long-term follow-up.     

Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.

OBJECTIVE: The current trend towards decreasing the age for selection of a tissue over a mechanical prosthesis has led to a dilemma for patients aged 50-65 years. This cohort study examines the long-term outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves in middle-aged patients. METHODS: Patients (N = 659) aged between 50 and 65 years who had first-time aortic valve replacement (AVR) and/or mitral valve replacement (MVR) with contemporary prostheses were followed prospectively after surgery. The total follow-up was 3,402 patient-years (mean 5.1 +/- 4.1 years; maximum 18.3 years). Outcomes were examined with multivariate actuarial methods. A composite outcome of major adverse prosthesis-related events (MAPE) was defined as the occurrence of reoperation, endocarditis, major bleeding, or thromboembolism. RESULTS: Ten-year survival was 73.2 +/- 4.2% after mechanical AVR, 75.1 +/- 12.6% after bioprosthetic AVR, 74.1 +/- 4.6% after mechanical MVR, and 77.9 +/- 7.4% after bioprosthetic MVR (P=NS). Ten-year reoperation rates were 35.4% and 21.3% with aortic and mitral bioprostheses, respectively. Major bleeding occurred more often following mechanical MVR (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2, 9.0; P = 0.022), and the incidence of any thromboembolic event was more common after mechanical MVR (HR: 4.7; CI 1.4, 13.3; P = 0.01). Overall freedom from MAPE at 10 years was 70.2 +/- 4.1% for mechanical AVR patients, 41.0+/-30.3% for bioprosthetic AVR patients, 53.3 +/- 8.8% for mechanical MVR patients, and 61.2 +/- 9.2% for bioprosthetic MVR patients. Although a trend existed towards more MAPE amongst middle-age patients with tissue valves, multivariate analysis did not identify the presence of a bioprosthesis as an independent risk factor for MAPE (HR: 1.3; CI 0.9, 2.0; P = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: In middle-aged patients, MAPE may occur more often in patients with bioprosthetic valves, but definitive conclusions necessitate the accumulation of additional follow-up. At present, these data do not support lowering the usual cutoff for implantation of a tissue valve below the age of 65.     

Mitral Valve Replacement with Dura Mater Bioprostheses

Dura mater bioprostheses for cardiac valve replacement were first introduced in Brazil. They have been used since 1975 at the National Heart Hospital, London, as a mitral valve replacement instead of fascia lata valves or inverted aortic homograft valves. During this period 120 patients have had dura mater valves inserted in the mitral position; 29 also received an aortic valve replacement, 6 with dura mater, 20 with an aortic homograft, 2 with an aortic xeno-graft and 1 with a prosthetic valve. Perivalvular leaks occurred with seven of these mitral valves, and another seven presented with detached cusps. All but one of these 14 valves were replaced. Emboli have occurred in four of the patients, one of whom died after 35 months with thrombus on the aortic valve, but with an unaffected mitral valve. There were 15 early deaths, a hospital mortality of 12.5%. and 10 late deaths, a postoperative mortality of 9.5%. Actuarial analysis has shown a four-year postoperative survival of 78.970.     

Redo aortic root replacement: experience with 31 patients

BACKGROUND: Aortic root re-replacement is being performed with increased frequency. Limited information is available regarding the surgical approaches and clinical outcomes of this reoperation. METHODS: Between May 1980 and May 1999, 31 patients (mean age, 45 +/- 15 years) underwent redo composite replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta. Indications for reoperation were prosthetic valve endocarditis in 12 patients (39%), failed biological valve in 17 (55%), and false aneurysm in 2 (6%). At reoperation, mechanical valves were implanted in 24 patients and biologic valves in 7. All patients with endocarditis had annular abscess and required reconstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract before implantation of a new valved conduit. Mechanical valves were used in 24 patients, aortic homograft in 4, and bioprosthetic valves in 3. The coronary button technique was used to reimplant the coronary arteries whenever possible. Extension of one or both coronary arteries with a short segment of saphenous vein or a synthetic graft was used in 16 patients (52%). The aortic arch was replaced in 7 patients (23%). RESULTS: There was one operative death (3%) because of rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The mean follow-up was 47 +/- 46 months and was 100% complete. There were five late deaths (16%), three of which were cardiac related. The actuarial survival was 71% +/- 12% at 5 years. Three patients experienced recurrent prosthetic valve endocarditis 4 months to 8 years after operation. The 8-year freedom from endocarditis for patients operated on for endocarditis was 82% +/- 11% compared with 100% for those operated on for other reasons (p = 0.1). At the last follow-up, 21 of 25 survivors (84%) were in New York Heart Association functional classes I or II, and 4 were in class III. CONCLUSIONS: Redo aortic root replacement can be performed with good early and late results. Patients operated on for prosthetic root endocarditis may have an increased risk of recurrent late endocarditis.     

Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenografts: follow-up of up to 6 years

The results of valve replacement with the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft compare favorably with results obtained with other bioprostheses. From March, 1977, to July, 1983, 497 Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valves were implanted in 463 patients at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute. There were 292 patients who had aortic valve replacement (AVR), 140 with mitral valve replacement (MVR), 28 with double valve replacement, and 3 with triple valve replacement. The survivors were followed regularly. Actuarial analysis of late results indicates an expected survival of 71% at 6 years for patients who underwent AVR and 72% at 3 years for patients who had MVR. The only valve-related deaths were due to endocarditis, which occurred at a rate of 3.9% per patient-year for aortic valves and 0.6% per patient-year for mitral valves. Despite a low usage of formal anticoagulation, embolic complications occurred at a rate of 1.4% per patient-year for aortic valves and 4.0% per patient-year for mitral valves. Five valves were removed for intrinsic failure after 36 to 72 months of follow-up. New York Heart Association Functional Class improved an average of 1.28 classes per patient.     

Mitral valvuloplasty, a better alternative. Comparative study between valve reconstruction and replacement for rheumatic mitral valve disease

Valvuloplasty is now a well accepted alternative method of surgical treatment of mitral valve disease. To analyse its relative performance in rheumatic valvulopathies, three groups of patients who had mitral valvuloplasty (1980-1984; 241 patients) or mitral valve replacement with mechanical (1980-1984; 386 patients) or biological prostheses (1976-1980; 289 patients) were reviewed. The early mortality was 3.3% for valvuloplasty, 7.8% for mechanical valve replacement and 6.6% for bioprostheses (P less than 0.05). Late mortality occurred at the rate of 2.6% per patient year (15 patients) for valvuloplasty, 5.7% per patient year (70 patients) for mechanical valves and 7.4% per patient year (41 patients) for bioprostheses (P less than 0.01), but valve-related mortality was 1.0% per patient year, 2.5% per patient year and 4.2% per patient year, respectively (P less than 0.01). Reoperation was more frequent after valve replacement with bioprostheses (6.7% per patient year) than after valvuloplasty (4.3% per patient year) and after mechanical valve replacement (1.5% per patient year; P less than 0.02), and was necessitated mainly by residual or recurrent valve dysfunction after valvuloplasty, bland or infected periprosthetic leaks in mechanical valves and degradation of bioprostheses. Valve failure occurred at the rate of 6.1% per patient year for valvuloplasty, 5.7% per patient year for mechanical valves and 11.1% per patient year for bioprostheses (P less than 0.05). In actuarial terms, global survival and survival free from valve related complications were 90% +/- 4% and 70% +/- 6% for patients who had valvuloplasty, 76% +/- 3% and 71% +/- 5% for the mechanical prosthetic replacement group and 62% +/- 7% and 30% +/- 7% for bioprosthetic valve replacement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Early and late risk of mitral valve replacement. A 12 year concomitant comparison of the porcine bioprosthetic and prosthetic disc mitral valves

A consecutive series of 706 mitral valve replacements was performed from January, 1972, to January, 1984. The follow-up ranged from 6 to 150 months with a mean of 50 and a median of 43 months. Seven percent (50) of the patient were lost to follow-up. There were 243 men and 463 women, whose ages ranged from 17 to 86 years (mean 58). A porcine bioprosthetic valve was implanted in 528 patients (514 Hancock and 14 Carpentier-Edwards valves) and a prosthetic disc valve in 178 patients (102 standard disc Bj?rk-Shiley, 34 Beall, and 42 Harken disc valves). Seven patients were in Functional Class II, 325 in Class III, and 374 in Class IV. A concomitant operative procedure was performed in 253 of the 706 patients (36%). Mitral regurgitation was the primary hemodynamic lesion in 363 and mitral stenosis in 343. Operative mortality figures were as follows: 77 of 706 (11%) for the overall group, 34 of 453 (7.5%) for isolated mitral valve replacement, 30 of 169 (17.5%, p = 0.001) for mitral replacement plus coronary bypass, 49 of 528 (9%) for the bioprosthetic valve group, and 28 of 178 (16%) for the prosthetic disc valve group (p = 0.01). After the operation, 262 patients were in Functional Class I, 99 in Class II, and 18 in Class III. The long-term survival rate was significantly lower in patients who had an associated procedure (45% +/- 6%), who had mitral regurgitation rather than mitral stenosis (53% +/- 5% versus 67% +/- 4%) (p = 0.002), who were in Functional Class IV rather than Classes I to III (51% +/- 4% versus 70% +/- 4%) (p = 0.001), and who received a prosthetic disc valve rather than a bioprosthesis (40% +/- 6% versus 67% +/- 4%) (p = 0.001). Thromboembolic rates were significantly higher with prosthetic valves than with bioprosthetic valves (4.6% +/- 0.22% versus 2.4% +/- 0.5% per patient-year of follow-up), and the incidence of anticoagulant-related hemorrhage was significantly higher in the prosthetic valve group (1.65% versus 0.43% per patient-year). Primary valve dysfunction was significantly more common in the bioprostheses (1.23% versus 0.40% per patient-year).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Cardiac valvular surgery in dialysis patients: comparison of surgical outcome for mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves

Purpose  There has been a changing preference for bioprosthetic valves over mechanical valves in dialysis patients, but there is still much controversy. We reviewed our 17-year experience and assessed the influence of prosthesis choice. Methods  From 1990 to 2007, a total of 63 consecutive dialysis patients who underwent valvular surgery (64 operations including one reoperation) at our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The mean age of the patients was 58.3 ± 9.0 years. The reasons for dialysis were glomerulonephritis (n = 32) and diabetes (n = 10). The major preoperative diagnosis was aortic stenosis (n = 44). The surgical procedures included aortic valve replacement (n = 44), mitral valve replacement (n = 7), double valvular replacement (n = 7), and mitral valve repair (n = 5). Prostheses for valve replacement were mechanical valves (n = 37) or bioprosthetic valves (n = 22). Follow-up was accomplished in 95.2%, and the mean follow-up period was 49 months. Results  Actuarial survivals at 1, 5, and 10 years were 85%, 64%, and 45% respectively. Freedom from cardiovascular events at 1 and 5 years was 61% and 41%, respectively. Mechanical valve patients had significantly higher early mortality than bioprosthetic valve patients (P = 0.03). However, both mechanical and bioprosthetic valve patients had similar survival and event-free rates (P = 0.87 and P = 0.27, respectively) in the midterm results. The mechanical group had a higher rate of bleeding events. There was no structural valve deterioration up to the 5-year follow-up. Conclusion  The choice of prosthesis did not influence the surgical outcome except for early mortality. Careful consideration of preventive measures against bleeding is important, and prosthesis selection should be based on the patient’s profile as well as the criteria for nondialysis patients.     

Valve-related complications with the Hancock I porcine bioprosthesis. A twelve- to fourteen-year follow-up study

Valve-related morbidity and mortality after heart valve replacement with the Hancock I porcine bioprosthesis has been retrospectively analyzed. From June 1974 through December 1976, 253 Hancock I bioprostheses (150 mitral and 103 aortic) were inserted in 220 selected patients who survived the operation and had follow-up until June 1989 (mean follow-up 13.5 years, with an accumulative follow-up of 2956.4 patient-years). One hundred seventeen patients had mitral valve replacement, 70 had aortic valve replacement, and 33 had combined mitral and aortic valve replacement. There were 27 thromboembolic events. The probability of being free from thromboembolism at 14 years was 81.0% +/- 7.4% for the mitral valve replacement group, 85.4% +/- 6.7% for the aortic group, and 67.1% +/- 18.4% for the mitral-aortic group. Fifteen episodes of prosthetic valve endocarditis occurred. There were 10 instances of nonstructural dysfunction (paravalvular leaks) in seven mitral valves (4.6%) and in three aortic valves (2.9%). One hundred twenty-two bioprostheses in 106 patients resulted in structural deterioration. The probability of freedom from structural deterioration at 14 years was 37.2% +/- 3.9% for the mitral group, 43.9% +/- 7.1% for the aortic group, and 30.1% +/- 8.9% for the mitral-aortic group. The logistic regression analysis between age at the time of operation and bioprosthetic life (structural deterioration-free period) demonstrates a linear regression curve (r = 0.53). There were 56 late deaths (27 patients died at reoperation). The actuarial survival rate (including hospital mortality) at 14 years was 57.2% +/- 5.4% for the entire series, with no statistically significant difference between groups. The probability of remaining free from valve-related morbidity and mortality at 14 years was 16.7% +/- 4.8% for the mitral group, 20.8% +/- 6.2% for the aortic group, and 14.0% +/- 7.0% for the mitral-aortic group. The long-term results of this series show that the clinical performance of the Hancock I porcine valve appears satisfactory during the first 6 years. The behavior of this bioprosthesis at 14 years' follow-up changes drastically, because only a minor group of patients is free from valve-related complications, justifying the restriction of its use for selected patients.