Sustained-release Madopar HBS® compared with standard Madopar® in the long-term treatment of de novo parkinsonian patients

In this Danish-Norwegian randomized double-blind parallel-group multicentre study, we compared the therapeutic response of slow-release Madopar HBS® to standard Madopar® in 134 de novo patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease during a 5-year period. The drugs were dosed according to the individual need of the patients. The Webster, NUDS, UPDRS and Hoehn & Yahr scales were used for evaluation of symptoms. Addition of a morning dose of standard Madopar 62.5 mg was allowed after 6 months. Bromocriptine could be administered but not Selegiline. Sixty-five patients got Madopar HBS and 69 standard Madopar. Surprisingly, no differences were found as to the mean daily levodopa dose, the mean number of daily doses or the use of and doses of bromocriptine. Unexpectedly, we found a trend towards a more frequent use of a morning dose of standard Madopar in the group treated with the standard formulation. No differences were observed in the occurrence of motor fluctuations or dyskinesia, the incidence of which was relatively low. Sustained-release Madopar (HBS) thus proved to be as effective as standard Madopar in the long-term treatment of de novo parkinsonian patients, but the drug showed no advantage in postponing or reducing the long-term levodopa treatment problems.     

Madopar HBS and the decompensated phase of Parkinson disease

The most important current problem in the treatment of Parkinson disease in the so-called L-dopa long-term-treatment syndrome. We present here the results of our experience with Madopar HBS in the treatment of two groups of patients suffering from L-dopa long-term treatment syndrome. In the first study we replaced the standard Madopar with Madopar HBS. In the second study, after identifying the most disabling “off” periods, we added Madopar HBS to the previous treatment in such a way as to control these “off” phases. Our study suggests that Madopar HBS is useful in reducing typical fluctuation phenomena in the majority of patients.

---

Sommario Attualmente il problema più importante nel trattamento del morbo di Parkinson è costituito dalla cosiddetta “sindrome da trattamento cronico con L-dopa”. Presentiamo qui di seguito i risultati della nostra esperienza con Madopar HBS nel trattamento di 2 gruppi di pazienti affetti da tale sindrome. Nella prima parte dello studio abbiamo sostituito del tutto il Madopar standard con Madopar HBS, nella seconda parte, dopo aver identificato il periodo “off” maggiormente invalidante, abbiamo aggiunto Madopar HBS al trattamento precedente in modo che fosse efficace sulla fase off così identificata. Il nostro lavoro suggerisce che il Madopar HBS è utile nel ridurre le fluttuazioni motorie nella maggioranza dei pazienti parkinsoniani.

     

普拉克索添加治疗帕金森病临床随机对照研究

目的 评价新型多巴胺受体激动剂普拉克索联合美多巴与单用美多巴治疗帕金森病(PD)患者的疗效及安全性. 方法 采用随机对照开放式研究,将70例PD患者按照随机数字表法分为普拉克索+美多巴组和美多巴组,每组各35例.治疗12周后判断其疗效及安全性.疗效判定的主要指标为统一PD评定量表第Ⅲ部分(UPDRSⅢ)的运动检查总评分相对患者基线的变化和第Ⅱ部分(UPDRS Ⅱ)的日常生活活动能力总评分相对患者基线的变化;次要指标为第Ⅰ部分(UPDRS Ⅰ)的精神、行为和情感总评分相对患者基线的变化和第Ⅳ部分(UPDRS Ⅳ)的治疗并发症总评分相对患者基线的变化和美多巴药物每日剂量相对基线的变化.安全性指标依据药物的不良反应来判定. 结果 普拉克索+美多巴组患者UPDRS Ⅲ总评分均值与基线相比下降了11.40分,高于美多巴组(9.26分),比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);UPDRS Ⅱ总评分均值与基线相比下降了4.57分,高于美多巴组(4.50分),比较差异无统计学意义(P<0.05);UPDRS Ⅰ总评分均值与基线相比下降了0.66分,低于美多巴组(1.14分),差异无统计学意义(P0.05);UPDRS Ⅳ总评分均值与基线相比下降了0.22分,美多巴组则升高了0.06分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).与基线相比,治疗后12周普拉克索+美多巴组美多巴的日用量下降了163.57 mg/d,美多巴组升高了8.57 mg/d,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).普拉克索+美多巴组在治疗后12周发生疗效减退、症状波动、异动症的例数均低于美多巴组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).美多巴组出现了明显的疗效减退、症状波动、异动症,而普拉克索+美多巴组无明显的上述症状,但有2例出现突然入睡发作、1例嗜睡、1例直立性低血压. 结论 普拉克索+美多巴组在改善PD运动功能方面优于美多巴组,在日常活动,精神、行为和情绪方面疗效相似.同时服用普拉克索可以明显减少美多巴的用量及其治疗后所引起的并发症(疗效减退、症状波动及异动症)的发生率.普拉克索可引起突然入睡发作、嗜睡、直立性低血压等副作用.     

Melevodopa/carbidopa effervescent formulation in the treatment of motor fluctuations in advanced Parkinson's disease

Melevodopa hydrochloride plus carbidopa in effervescent tablets (M/C) is a readily soluble antiparkinsonian tablet formulation. A total of 221 patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations entered a randomized, double‐blind, double‐dummy, controlled parallel group study, which compared the effectiveness of oral M/C effervescent tablets with standard oral formulation levodopa/carbidopa tablets (L/C; Sinemet) in reducing total daily OFF time. The difference of total daily OFF time (intention‐to‐treat population) between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.07): ?39.4 minutes (95%CI: ?67.08 to ?11.73) in M/C group vs. +3.5 minutes (95%CI: ?36.19 to +43.26) in the L/C group. In the intragroup analysis, M/C significantly reduced the baseline daily OFF, which remained unchanged in the L/C group. There were no unexpected adverse events in either treatment arms, and discontinuation rates due to adverse events did not differ between the two groups [M/C: 2 patients (1.3%); L/C: 1 patient (1.4%)]. This study failed to meet the primary endpoint (P = 0.07); however, there was a trend in favour of the M/C preparation, which deserves further attention. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society     

Efficacy and tolerability of entacapone in patients with Parkinson's disease treated with levodopa plus a dopamine agonist and experiencing wearing-off motor fluctuations. A randomized,double-blind,multicentre study

The efficacy and tolerability of entacapone was investigated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-month study of 162 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) treated with levodopa and a dopamine agonist and experiencing wearing-off motor fluctuations. Patients were randomized in a 3 : 2 ratio to entacapone 200 mg or placebo, administered with each dose of levodopa. Efficacy was judged on the improvement of "on" and "off" time while awake (Patient Diary and UPDRS part IV Item 39), Investigators' Global Assessment, the SF-36 Health Survey, and changes in levodopa dosages. Patients were monitored for adverse events, laboratory safety and vital signs throughout the study. Improvements in "on" time as assessed using patient diary data showed a trend in favour of entacapone, however these did not reach statistical significance. "Off" time while awake (UPDRS part IV Item 39) showed an improvement of at least one category in 36% of entacapone-treated patients, compared with 22% in the control group (p = 0.0038). The proportion of patients showing an improvement at the Investigators' Global Assessment was significantly higher (p = 0.0006) in the entacapone-treated group of patients. Also, the proportion of patients with a reduction in their daily levodopa dose was significantly higher (p = 0.02) in the entacapone group (28%) compared with placebo (13%). As expected, the most frequent adverse events were dopamine-mediated (dyskinesia: entacapone 31% versus placebo 13%), and harmless urinary discoloration. The modest increase in dyskinesias could be readily managed by levodopa down-adjustment, and, at study end there was no significant difference for the UPDRS "overall dyskinesia score" between entacapone and placebo. In conclusion, although the primary efficacy variable did not reach statistical significance, the present results demonstrate that entacapone provides additional antiparkinsonian benefits to levodopa therapy and is well tolerated in levodopa-treated PD patients experiencing wearing-off motor fluctuations despite adjunct dopamine agonist therapy.     

Combination of selegiline and controlled release levodopa in the treatment of fluctuations of clinical disability in parkinsonian patients

Abstract– Thirteen parkinsonians with a long duration of the disease and long-term dopa therapy, seven of them showing severe on-off oscillations and 6 an "end—of—dose impairment", were treated with a controlled release (HBS) preparation of L-DOPA/benserazide for more than 3 years.
Thereafter, selegiline was added in a progressively increasing dosage up to a maximum of 10 mg/day during 4 months, with the aim of a) further improving the long-term results and b) reducing the doses of the new formula of L-DOPA.
A significant decrease of early morning parkinsonism and reduction of motor disability throughout the day were observed; "wearing-off'cases showed better results compared with those presenting "on-off'oscillations. A mean reduction of 20% in the doses of levodopa was achieved. Likewise, a mild reduction of dyskinesias and a mild-moderate enhancement of dystonias were recorded. Only one patient did not tolerate selegiline and two others received lower doses due to side-effects.
Selegiline was capable of enhancing the antiparkinsonian effect of the new formula of L-DOPA, while allowing a reduction of the doses administered. It must also be emphasized that such improvement was achieved in complicated patients, most of whom showed some deterioration of response in the late stages of long-term sustained release levodopa treatment.     

Early treatment benefits of ropinirole prolonged release in Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations

We performed a retrospective analysis of the Efficacy And Safety Evaluation in Parkinson's Disease (EASE‐PD) Adjunct Study, assessing the minimum time to symptom improvement after initiation of ropinirole prolonged release (2–24 mg/day) versus placebo in patients with moderate‐to‐advanced PD not optimally controlled with levodopa. Ropinirole prolonged release was superior to placebo at Week 2 for change from baseline in “off” time (adjusted mean treatment difference [AMTD] – 0.7 hours; 95% confidence interval [CI], –1.1, –0.2; P = 0.0029), and “on” time without troublesome dyskinesia (0.4 hours; 95%CI, 0.01, 0.88; P = 0.0444). At Week 4, improvements were seen in change from baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale total motor score (AMTD, –3.1; 95%CI, –4.4, –1.8; P < 0.0001), activities of daily living score (AMTD, –1.1; 95%CI, –1.7, –0.5; P = 0.0004), and the cardinal symptoms of PD compared with placebo. These analyses indicate that once‐daily, adjunctive ropinirole prolonged release can offer PD symptom control 2 weeks after treatment initiation. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society     

Low‐protein and protein‐redistribution diets for Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations: A systematic review

The American Academy of Neurology suggests advising the redistribution of daily protein meal content to every Parkinson's disease (PD) patient with motor fluctuations during levodopa treatment. However, no comprehensive evaluation of this complementary therapy has been performed. A systematic review of intervention studies investigating the neurologic outcome of low‐protein (<0.8 g/kg of ideal weight/day) and protein‐redistribution diets in patients with PD experiencing motor fluctuations during levodopa treatment. All studies (uncontrolled or randomized) investigating a low‐protein and/or a protein‐redistribution diet (LPD and PRD) and involving patients with PD with motor fluctuations were included, provided that sufficient information on dietary protein content and neurologic outcome measures was available. We identified 16 eligible studies, but they were markedly heterogeneous. There was not enough evidence to support the use of LPD. Response to PRD seemed very good. Acceptability appeared high upon introduction, but it seemed to progressively decrease over time. On average, PRD resulted in improved motor function, but also complications occurred. At the beginning, drop‐outs were due to levodopa side effects rather than unsatisfactory benefits. Long‐term adherence was more affected by changes in dietary habits than by diet‐related side effects. Efficacy and benefits appeared to be higher when the intervention was proposed to subjects in the early stages of PD. PRD can be safely advised to fluctuating patients with PD, but those in whom benefits override the possible inconveniences still need to be identified. The long‐term effects of PRD on nutritional status should be evaluated and true effectiveness in clinical practice should be reassessed, given the changes in levodopa formulations and the introduction of several adjuvants (levodopa degradation inhibitors and/or dopamine agonists). © 2010 Movement Disorder Society.     

Levodopa/DDCI and entacapone is the preferred treatment for Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations in routine practice: a retrospective, observational analysis of a large French cohort

Levodopa is the gold standard drug for the symptomatic control of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, long-term treatment with conventional formulations [levodopa and a dopa decarboxylase inhibitor (DDCI)], is associated with re-emergence of symptoms because of wearing-off and dyskinesia. Treatment with levodopa/DDCI and entacapone extends the half-life of levodopa, avoiding deep troughs in levodopa plasma levels and providing more continuous delivery of levodopa to the brain. In this open-label, retrospective, observational study we investigated the effects of levodopa/DDCI and entacapone therapy in 800 PD patients with motor fluctuations. Levodopa/DDCI and entacapone treatment was assessed as good/very good in improving motor fluctuations (64%) and activities of daily living (ADL; 62%). The therapeutic utility was considered to be good/very good in 70% of cases. Moreover, there was a reduction in levodopa dose in 20% of patients. Neurologists preferred levodopa/DDCI and entacapone compared with increasing levodopa dosage, dose-fractionation or addition of a dopamine agonist (63%, 29% and 23% of patients respectively). Reasons included achieving more continuous dopaminergic stimulation (40%), reducing motor fluctuations (54%) and improving ADL (41%). This analysis reveals the preference of neurologists for levodopa/DDCI and entacapone over conventional levodopa-modification strategies for the effective treatment of PD motor fluctuations in clinical practice.     

Motor response to levodopa and the evolution of motor fluctuations in the first decade of treatment of Parkinson's disease.

Thirty-four patients with Parkinson's disease were followed for a mean period of 8 years from the time of initiation of levodopa medication. Levodopa response was charted from the starting point of pharmacological treatment to give a longitudinal point of view of the changes that evolve as the disease progresses. Objective measurements of the motor response to levodopa test-doses were made at approximately three yearly intervals. Motor fluctuations developed in 58% of the patient group after a mean treatment period of 35 months. Dyskinesia developed in parallel with fluctuations but appeared on average 7 months before symptomatic wearing-off effects of levodopa doses. The patients with motor fluctuations had significantly better responses to levodopa. By contrast, nonfluctuators were more prone to develop increasing midline motor disability affecting speech, gait and balance. Comparison of test-dose and pretreatment scores suggested that a substantial long-duration response to levodopa remains after many years of treatment, and that lateralized motor deficits show a stronger long duration response than midline ones. Motor fluctuations are a consequence of disease progression but their early development is, on balance, associated with better long-term functional ability because these patients have the greater capacity to respond to pharmacological treatment.     

Prospective evaluation of pulmonary function in Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations

Background. Spirometry patterns suggesting restrictive and obstructive pulmonary dysfunction have been reported in Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, the patterns’ precise relation to PD pathophysiology remains unclear. Purpose/Aim. To assess ON- versus OFF-state pulmonary function, the quality of its spirometric evaluation, and the quality of longitudinal spirometric findings in a large sample of PD patients with motor fluctuations. Methods. During a placebo-controlled trial of an inhaled levodopa formulation, CVT-301, in PD patients with ≥2 h/d of OFF time, spirometry was performed by American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines at screening and throughout the 4-week treatment period. Results. Among 86 patients, mean motor impairment during an OFF state at screening was moderately severe. However, mean spirometry results at screening were within normal ranges, and in a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM), the results at screening were not dependent on motor state (ON vs. OFF). In the placebo group (n = 43), 76% of ON-state and 81% of OFF-state examinations throughout the study met ATS quality metrics, and in an MMRM analysis, mean findings at these patients’ arrivals for treatment-period visits showed no significant 4-week change. Across all 86 patients, flow-volume curves prior to any study-drug administration showed only a 3% incidence of “sawtooth” morphology. Conclusions. In PD patients with motor fluctuations, longitudinal spirometry of acceptable quality was generally obtained. Although mean findings were normal, about a quarter of spirograms did not meet ATS quality criteria. Spirogram morphology may be less indicative of various forms of respiratory dysfunction than has previously been reported in PD.     

Quality of life in early Parkinson's disease: impact of dyskinesias and motor fluctuations.

The impact of dyskinesias and motor fluctuations on quality of life (QOL) at various stages in the course of Parkinson's disease (PD) is not well understood. In 301 subjects with early PD enrolled in a clinical trial (CALM-PD), we quantified the impact of motor complications on QOL and investigated how this changes over time. We also compared QOL related to demographic and treatment characteristics. The presence of dyskinesias was associated with visual analogue scale (VAS) scores 3.0 of 100 points higher (better) than those without dyskinesias in years 1 to 2, even when adjusting for Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor scores. The positive association between dyskinesias and QOL scores was more marked in older patients. In years 3 to 4, dyskinesias no longer had a significant relationship with QOL. Younger subjects had higher VAS scores. Gender, motor fluctuations, and treatment regimen had no significant association with QOL, although a trend was found toward a small negative effect of motor fluctuations on QOL. We conclude that motor complications that occur within the first 4 years of treatment of PD do not have a significant negative effect on quality of life as measured by a visual analogue scale for most patients.     

Helicobacter pylori infection and motor fluctuations in patients with Parkinson's disease

To investigate whether Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection affects the clinical response to levodopa and whether its eradication could improve motor fluctuation in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Using the [¹³C] urea breath test, we monitored HP infection in 65 patients with PD and motor fluctuations of the “wearing‐off” or delayed “on” types, with or without dyskinesia. We compared the clinical features and response to L ‐dopa between HP noninfected (n = 30) and HP infected patients (n = 35) by reviewing home diaries kept for 72 hours. Among HP infected patients, we compared the differences in L ‐dopa “onset” time, “on‐time” duration, and scores on the motor examination section of the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS‐III) during the medication “on” phase before and after HP eradication. There were no differences in the age, disease duration, Hoehn and Yahr stage, UPDRS‐III score, L ‐dopa daily dose, and frequency of dyskinesia between HP noninfected and HP infected groups. However, L ‐dopa “onset” time was longer and “on‐time” duration was shorter in HP infected patients than in HP noninfected patients (78.4 ± 28.2 vs. 56.7 ± 25.1 and 210.0 ± 75.7 vs. 257.7 ± 68.9 min, respectively, P < 0.05). HP eradication improved the delay L ‐dopa “onset” time and short “on‐time” duration (to 58.1 ± 25.6 and to 234.4 ± 66.5 min, respectively, P < 0.05). These data demonstrated that HP infection could interfere with the absorption of L ‐dopa and provoke motor fluctuations. HP eradication can improve the motor fluctuations of HP infected patients with PD. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society     

Comparison of motor fluctuations and l-dopa-induced dyskinesias in patients with familial and sporadic Parkinson''s disease

The aim of the present work was to study the characteristics of motor complications in a group of familial Parkinson's disease (fPD) patients in comparison with matched sporadic PD (sPD) patients. Fifty-one fPD and 51 sPD patients matched for age and disease duration, used as controls, were included in the study. The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale was completed during clinical examination and all patients were questioned about the characteristics of motor complications. The mean time from start of L-dopa therapy to the onset of motor fluctuations (MF) and L-dopa-induced dyskinesias (LID) as well as the mean time from symptom onset to the development of MF and LID was significantly shorter in the fPD group of patients. An analysis revealed a higher occurrence of MF and LID in fPD patients in the group with disease duration of 5 years or less. FPD may be associated with a higher prevalence and earlier onset of motor complications during the initial stages of the disease. Genetic factors may contribute to the specific characteristics of motor complications in fPD.     

Study of istradefylline in patients with Parkinson's disease on levodopa with motor fluctuations

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of istradefylline 20 mg once daily versus placebo as an adjunct to levodopa in subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD) who have motor fluctuations. Istradefylline (KW‐6002) is an adenosine A_2A receptor antagonist that in primate models of PD improves motor function without causing or worsening dyskinesia. This 12‐week, multicenter, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, randomized, Phase 3 study of istradefylline was conducted in subjects experiencing an average daily OFF time of at least 3 hours (116 randomized to istradefylline; 115 to placebo). All were on stable levodopa regimens; 90% were also on stable regimens of other anti‐Parkinson's medications. Istradefylline‐treated subjects had significant placebo‐corrected reductions in daily OFF time from baseline to endpoint: 4.6% (P = 0.03) and 0.7 hours (P = 0.03). For ON time with troublesome dyskinesia, the changes between istradefylline and placebo were not significant. Istradefylline was well tolerated, with 6 (5.2%) istradefylline‐treated and 7 (6.1%) placebo‐treated subjects withdrawing from the study because of adverse events. Dyskinesia, lightheadedness, tremor, constipation, and weight decrease were reported more often with istradefylline than placebo. We conclude that istradefylline is well tolerated and significantly reduces OFF time as an adjunct to levodopa in PD subjects with motor fluctuations. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society     

LY293558, an AMPA glutamate receptor antagonist, prevents and reverses levodopa-induced motor alterations in Parkinsonian rats.

To evaluate the possible involvement of glutamate AMPA receptor-mediated mechanisms in levodopa-induced motor fluctuations, we investigated the effects of LY293558, a competitive AMPA receptor antagonist, on levodopa-induced motor alterations in rats with unilateral 6-OHDA lesion. Acute and chronic administration of LY293558 was studied to evaluate the possible reversion or prevention of these levodopa effects. In the first set of experiments, rats were treated with levodopa (25 mg/kg with benserazide, twice daily, i.p.) for 22 days and on day 23 LY293558 (5 mg/kg, i.p.) was administered immediately before levodopa. In the second set of experiments, rats were treated daily for 22 days with levodopa and LY293558 (5 mg/kg, twice daily, i.p.). In the third set of experiments, the effect of LY293558 (5 mg/kg, i.p.) administration on selective dopamine D-1 (SKF38393, 1.5 mg/kg, s.c.) and D-2 agonist (quinpirole, 0.1 mg/kg, i.p.)-induced rotational behavior after daily levodopa treatment was studied. The duration of the rotational behavior induced by chronic levodopa decreased by 30% after 22 days. Acute administration of LY293558 on day 23 reversed this effect. The group of animals that were chronically treated with levodopa and LY293558 did not show the decrease in this motor response duration. Chronic levodopa treatment attenuated the rotational response to the D-1 agonist SKF38393 and increased the response to the D-2 agonist quinpirole. LY293558 did not reverse the effect of levodopa on rotational behavior induced by the D-1 agonist but significantly reduced the rotational response to the D-2 agonist in levodopa-treated animals by 40%. Our results demonstrate that an AMPA receptor antagonist reverses and prevents levodopa-induced motor alterations in parkinsonian rats and that this effect on motor fluctuations induced by chronic levodopa is probably due to a modulation of the indirect output pathway of the basal ganglia.     

Bimodal administration of entacapone in Parkinson's disease patients improves motor control

Catechol- O -methyl transferase (COMT) inhibition by entacapone enhances levodopa absorption and reduces 'off' time in Parkinson's disease (PD). We hypothesized that the administration of entacapone in a bimodal fashion (two doses 1 h apart) would enhance levodopa absorption and improve the motor symptoms of PD. Patients with PD ( n  = 17) were given immediate (IR)- or controlled (CR)-release levodopa each with either one or two doses of entacapone. Bimodal entacapone produced a significant increase in IR and CR levodopa half-life, 'area under the curve' (AUC), and C _max with levodopa CR. For both IR and CR levodopa, bimodal entacapone resulted in a significant improvement in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (motor). Bimodal entacapone increased COMT inhibition, improved the pharmacokinetics of levodopa and improved motor scores for 6 to 8 h. Bimodal use of entacapone may be useful in selected patients to improve motor control and implies that controlled release COMT inhibition would be beneficial in PD patients.