Kidney‐Induced Cardiac Allograft Tolerance in Miniature Swine is Dependent on MHC‐Matching of Donor Cardiac and Renal Parenchyma

Kidney allografts possess the ability to enable a short course of immunosuppression to induce tolerance of themselves and of cardiac allografts across a full‐MHC barrier in miniature swine. However, the renal element(s) responsible for kidney‐induced cardiac allograft tolerance (KICAT) are unknown. Here we investigated whether MHC disparities between parenchyma versus hematopoietic‐derived “passenger” cells of the heart and kidney allografts affected KICAT. Heart and kidney allografts were co‐transplanted into MHC‐mismatched recipients treated with high‐dose tacrolimus for 12 days. Group 1 animals (n = 3) received kidney and heart allografts fully MHC‐mismatched to each other and to the recipient. Group 2 animals (n = 3) received kidney and heart allografts MHC‐matched to each other but MHC‐mismatched to the recipient. Group 3 animals (n = 3) received chimeric kidney allografts whose parenchyma was MHC‐mismatched to the donor heart. Group 4 animals (n = 3) received chimeric kidney allografts whose passenger leukocytes were MHC‐mismatched to the donor heart. Five of six heart allografts in Groups 1 and 3 rejected <40 days. In contrast, heart allografts in Groups 2 and 4 survived >150 days without rejection (p < 0.05). These data demonstrate that KICAT requires MHC‐matching between kidney allograft parenchyma and heart allografts, suggesting that cells intrinsic to the kidney enable cardiac allograft tolerance.     

Effects of Lung Cotransplantation on Cardiac Allograft Tolerance Across a Full Major Histocompatibility Complex Barrier in Miniature Swine

A 12‐day course of high‐dose tacrolimus induces tolerance of major histocompatibility complex–mismatched lung allografts in miniature swine but does not induce tolerance of heart allografts unless a kidney is cotransplanted. To determine whether lungs share with kidneys the ability to induce cardiac allograft tolerance, we investigated heart–lung cotransplantation using the same induction protocol. Hearts (n = 3), heart–kidneys (n = 3), lungs (n = 6), and hearts–lungs (n = 3) were transplanted into fully major histocompatibility complex–mismatched recipients treated with high‐dose tacrolimus for 12 days. Serial biopsy samples were used to evaluate rejection, and in vitro assays were used to detect donor responsiveness. All heart–kidney recipients and five of six lung recipients demonstrated long‐term graft survival for longer than 272 days, while all heart recipients rejected their allografts within 35 days. Tolerant recipients remained free of alloantibody and showed persistent donor‐specific unresponsiveness by cell‐mediated lympholysis/mixed‐lymphocyte reaction. In contrast, heart–lung recipients demonstrated rejection of both allografts (days 47, 55, and 202) and antidonor responsiveness in vitro. In contrast to kidneys, lung cotransplantation leads to rejection of both heart and lung allografts, indicating that lungs do not have the same tolerogenic capacity as kidneys. We conclude that cells or cell products present in kidney, but not heart or lung allografts, have a unique capacity to confer unresponsiveness on cotransplanted organs, most likely by amplifying host regulatory mechanisms.     

The effects of brain death and ischemia on tolerance induction are organ‐specific

We have previously shown that 12 days of high‐dose calcineurin inhibition induced tolerance in MHC inbred miniature swine receiving MHC‐mismatched lung, kidney, or co‐transplanted heart/kidney allografts. However, if lung grafts were procured from donation after brain death (DBD), and transplanted alone, they were rejected within 19‐45 days. Here, we investigated whether donor brain death with or without allograft ischemia would also prevent tolerance induction in kidney or heart/kidney recipients. Four kidney recipients treated with 12 days of calcineurin inhibition received organs from donors rendered brain dead for 4 hours. Six heart/kidney recipients also treated with calcineurin inhibition received organs from donors rendered brain dead for 4 hours, 8 hours, or 4 hours with 4 additional hours of cold storage. In contrast to lung allograft recipients, all isolated kidney or heart/kidney recipients that received organs from DBD donors achieved long‐term survival (>100 days) without histologic evidence of rejection. Proinflammatory cytokine gene expression was upregulated in lungs and hearts, but not kidney allografts, after brain death. These data suggest that the deleterious effects of brain death and ischemia on tolerance induction are organ‐specific, which has implications for the application of tolerance to clinical transplantation.     

Induction of tolerance to heart transplants by simultaneous cotransplantation of donor kidneys may depend on a radiation-sensitive renal-cell population

BACKGROUND: To determine the mechanism by which cotransplantation of a donor kidney and heart allograft induces tolerance to both organs in miniature swine, we examined the renal elements responsible for tolerance induction. METHODS: Recipients received 12 days of cyclosporine, and transplants were performed across a major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I mismatch. Group 1 animals received heart transplants (n=5); group 2 animals received heart and kidney allografts with no other manipulation (n=4); group 3 animals received heart transplants and donor-specific renal parenchymal cells (n=4); group 4 animals received heart and kidney allografts from lethally irradiated donors (n=7); group 5 animals received irradiated hearts and nonirradiated kidneys (n=2); group 6 animals received nonirradiated hearts and peripheral blood leukocytes from swine MHC matched to recipients and becoming tolerant to donor antigen (n=2); group 7 animals received nonirradiated hearts and donor-specific peripheral blood monocyte cells (PBMC) (n=2). RESULTS: Animals in group 1 developed vasculopathy and fulminant rejection by day 55. Animals in group 2 never developed vascular lesions. Parenchymal kidney cell infusion (group 3) did not prolong cardiac survival. Animals in group 4 developed arteriopathy by postoperative day (POD) 28. Group 5 recipients accepted allografts without vascular lesions. Adoptive transfer of leukocytes from tolerant swine (group 6) prolonged cardiac graft survival as much as 123 days, whereas donor PBMC infusion (group 7) did not affect cardiac survival or development of arteriopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Radiosensitive elements in kidney allograft may be responsible for tolerance induction and prevention of chronic vascular lesions in recipients of simultaneous heart and kidney allografts.     

The Effect of MHC Antigen Matching Between Donors and Recipients on Skin Tolerance of Vascularized Composite Allografts

The emergence of skin‐containing vascularized composite allografts (VCAs) has provided impetus to understand factors affecting rejection and tolerance of skin. VCA tolerance can be established in miniature swine across haploidentical MHC barriers using mixed chimerism. Because the deceased donor pool for VCAs does not permit MHC antigen matching, clinical VCAs are transplanted across varying MHC disparities. We investigated whether sharing of MHC class I or II antigens between donors and recipients influences VCA skin tolerance. Miniature swine were conditioned nonmyeloablatively and received hematopoietic stem cell transplants and VCAs across MHC class I (n = 3) or class II (n = 3) barriers. In vitro immune responsiveness was assessed, and VCA skin‐resident leukocytes were characterized by flow cytometry. Stable mixed chimerism was established in all animals. MHC class II–mismatched chimeras were tolerant of VCAs. MHC class I–mismatched animals, however, rejected VCA skin, characterized by infiltration of recipient‐type CD8⁺ lymphocytes. Systemic donor‐specific nonresponsiveness was maintained, including after VCA rejection. This study shows that MHC antigen matching influences VCA skin rejection and suggests that local regulation of immune tolerance is critical in long‐term acceptance of all VCA components. These results help elucidate novel mechanisms underlying skin tolerance and identify clinically relevant VCA tolerance strategies.     

The Indirect Alloresponse Impairs the Induction but Not Maintenance of Tolerance to MHC Class I-Disparate Allografts

We studied the effects of indirect allorecognition on the induction and maintenance phases of tolerance in miniature swine cotransplanted with heart and kidney allografts. MHC class I-mismatched heart and kidney grafts were cotransplanted in recipients receiving CyA for 12 days. Recipients were unimmunized or immunized with a set of donor-derived or control third-party MHC class I peptides either 21 days prior to transplantation or over 100 days after transplantation. T-cell proliferation, delayed type hypersensitivity reaction (DTH) and antibody production were assessed. All animals injected with donor MHC class I peptides developed potent indirect alloresponses specific to the immunizing peptides. While untreated recipients developed stable tolerance, all animals preimmunized with donor allopeptides rejected kidney–heart transplants acutely. In contrast, when peptide immunization was delayed until over 100 days after kidney–heart transplantation, no effects were observed on graft function or in vitro measures of alloimmunity. Donor peptide immunization prevented tolerance when administered to recipients pre transplantation but did not abrogate tolerance when administered to long-term survivors post transplantation. This suggests that the presence of T cells activated via indirect allorecognition represent a barrier to the induction but not the maintenance of tolerance.     

Donor Brain Death Inhibits Tolerance Induction in Miniature Swine Recipients of Fully MHC‐Disparate Pulmonary Allografts

We have previously shown that a short course of high‐dose tacrolimus induces long‐term tolerance to fully mismatched lung allografts procured from healthy MHC‐inbred miniature swine. Here, we investigate whether donor brain death affects tolerance induction. Four recipient swine were transplanted with fully mismatched lung grafts from donors that were rendered brain dead and mechanically ventilated for 4 h before procurement (Group 1). These recipients were compared to two control groups (Group 2: 4 h of donor ventilation without brain death [n = 5]; and Group 3: no donor brain death with <1 h of ventilation [n = 6]). All recipients were treated with a 12‐day course of tacrolimus. In contrast to both groups of control animals, the swine transplanted with lung allografts from brain dead donors all rejected their grafts by postoperative day 45 and showed persistent responsiveness to donor antigen by MLR. Several additional swine underwent brain death induction and/or mechanical ventilation alone to determine the effects of these procedures on the expression of proinflammatory molecules. Significant increases in serum concentrations of IL‐1, TNF‐α and IL‐10 were seen after brain death. Upregulation of IL‐1 and IL‐6 gene expression was also observed.     

In Vivo Function of Immune Inhibitory Molecule B7‐H4 in Alloimmune Responses

B7 ligands deliver both costimulatory and coinhibitory signals to the CD28 family of receptors on T lymphocytes, the balance between which determines the ultimate immune response. Although B7‐H4, a recently discovered member of the B7 family, is known to negatively regulate T cell immunity in autoimmunity and cancer, its role in solid organ allograft rejection and tolerance has not been established. Targeting the B7‐H4 molecule by a blocking antibody or use of B7‐H4^?/? mice as recipients of fully MHC‐mismatched cardiac allografts did not affect graft survival. However, B7‐H4 blockade resulted in accelerated allograft rejection in CD28‐deficient recipients. B7‐1/B7‐2‐double‐deficient recipients are truly independent of CD28/CTLA‐4:B7 signals and usually accept MHC‐mismatched heart allografts. Blockade of B7‐H4 in these mice also precipitated rejection, demonstrating regulatory function of this molecule independent of an intact CD28/CTLA‐4:B7 costimulatory pathway. Accelerated allograft rejection was always accompanied by increased frequencies of alloreactive IFN‐γ‐, IL‐4‐ and Granzyme B‐producing splenocytes. Finally, intact recipient, but not donor, B7‐H4 is essential for prolongation of allograft survival by blocking CD28/CTLA4:B7 pathway using CTLA4‐Ig. These data are the first to provide evidence of the regulatory effects of B7‐H4 in alloimmune responses in a murine model of solid organ transplantation.     

An MHC class II disparity raises the threshold for tolerance induction in pulmonary allografts in miniature swine

OBJECTIVES: The mechanisms and treatment of chronic rejection in pulmonary allotransplantation remain elusive. We have induced robust tolerance to class I-disparate lung allografts in miniature swine using an intensive 12-day course of tacrolimus. Here, we tested whether a tolerant state can be induced in swine receiving fully mismatched lung allografts. METHODS: Orthotopic left lung allografts were performed using MHC class I-disparate (group 1: n = 3) or fully disparate (group 2: n = 6) donors. The recipients received a 12-day postoperative course of tacrolimus (continuous intravenous infusion; target level = 35-50 ng/mL) as their only immunosuppression. RESULTS: All swine in group 1 maintained their grafts long term without developing any lesions of chronic rejection (>497, >432, >451 days). These recipients exhibited donor-specific hyporesponsiveness in cell-mediated lymphocytotoxity (CML) and mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) assays. In group 2, five of the six recipients maintained their grafts long term (sacrificed on postoperative days 515, 389, 429, 481, and 438 with viable grafts). Isolated lesions of obliterative bronchiolitis were occasionally seen on biopsy, and donor-specific hyporesponsiveness on assays was consistently observed. The remaining recipient rejected its graft on day 103 with histologic findings of obliterative bronchiolitis. CONCLUSIONS: We report long-term graft acceptance without chronic immunosuppression in five of six recipients across a full MHC disparity, albeit with some evidence of obliterative bronchiolitis. These data suggest that the class II disparity inherent in a fully mismatched transplant increases the requirement for tolerance induction.     

The effect of thymectomy on tolerance induction and cardiac allograft vasculopathy in a miniature swine heart/kidney transplantation model.

BACKGROUND: We have previously demonstrated that MHC class I disparate hearts transplanted into miniature swine treated with a short course of cyclosporine developed florid cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and were rejected within 55 days. However, when a donor-specific kidney is cotransplanted with the heart allograft, recipients become tolerant to donor antigen and accept both allografts long-term without the development of CAV. In the present study, we have investigated the role of the host thymus in the induction of tolerance and prevention of CAV in heart/kidney recipients. METHODS: Total thymectomies were performed in six animals (postoperative day [POD]-21), which on day 0 received either an isolated MHC class I disparate heart allograft (n=3) or combined class I disparate heart and kidney allografts (n=3), followed in both cases by a 12-day course of cyclosporine (POD 0-11). Graft survival and the development of CAV in these thymectomized recipients were compared to the same parameters in non-thymectomized, cyclosporine-treated recipients bearing either class I disparate heart allografts (n=5) or heart and kidney allografts (n=4). RESULTS: In the group of animals bearing isolated class I disparate heart allografts, the thymectomized recipients rejected their allografts earlier (POD 8, 22, 27) than the non-thymectomized recipients (POD 33,35,45,47,55). The donor hearts in both the thymectomized and non-thymectomized animals developed florid CAV. In the group of animals bearing combined class I disparate heart and kidney allografts, the nonthymectomized recipients accepted both donor organs long term with no evidence of CAV. In contrast, none of the thymectomized heart/kidney recipients survived >100 days, and they all developed the intimal proliferation of CAV. CONCLUSION: Thymic-dependent mechanisms are necessary for the induction of acquired tolerance and prevention of CAV in porcine heart/kidney recipients.     

Induction of Tolerance by Exosomes and Short-Term Immunosuppression in a Fully MHC-Mismatched Rat Cardiac Allograft Model

Exosomes are MHC‐bearing vesicles secreted by a wide array of cells. We have previously shown that donor‐haplotype exosomes from bone marrow dendritic cells (DCs) injected before transplantation significantly prolong heart allograft survival in congenic and fully MHC‐mismatched Lewis rats. Here we show that donor exosomes administered after transplantation are similarly able to prolong allograft survival, however, without inducing tolerance. We therefore tested the effect of exosomes combined with short‐term LF 15‐0195 (LF) treatment, which blocks the maturation of DCs, so that donor‐MHC antigens from exosomes could be presented in a more tolerogenic environment. LF treatment does not preclude the development of a strong antidonor cellular response, and while LF, but not exosome, treatment inhibits the antidonor humoral response and decreases leukocyte graft infiltration, allografts from LF‐treated recipients were either acutely or strongly chronically rejected. Interestingly, when combined with LF treatment, exosomes induced a donor‐specific allograft tolerance characterized by a strong inhibition of the antidonor proliferative response. This donor‐specific tolerance was transferable to naïve allograft recipients. Moreover, exosomes/LF treatment prevented or considerably delayed the appearance of chronic rejection. These results suggest that under LF treatment, presentation of donor‐MHC antigens (from exosomes) can induce regulatory responses that are able to modulate allograft rejection and to induce donor‐specific allograft tolerance.     

Facial tissue allograft transplantation

A hemifacial allograft transplant model was used to investigate the rationale for development of functional tolerance across an MHC barrier. Thirty hemiface transplantations were performed in five groups of six Lewis (RT1(1)) rat recipients each. Isografts were performed in group 1. Transplants were obtained from semiallogenic LBN(RT1(1+n)) in group 2 and from fully allogenic ACI(RT1(a)) in group 3 donors, which served as allograft rejection controls. Group 4 grafts using LBN donors and group 5 using ACI donors in addition received CsA monotherapy (16 mg/kg/d for 1 week) and maintained at 2 mg/kg/d. Signs of graft rejection were sought daily. Isograft controls survived indefinitely. All nontreated allografts were rejected within 5 to 8 days posttransplant. Eighty-three percent of face-transplant recipients from LBN donors and 67% from ACI donors did not show any signs of rejection up to 270 days and 200 days, respectively. Flow cytometry at day 63 in LBN recipients showed the presence of donor-specific chimerism for MHC class I RT1(n) antigens, namely 3.39% CD4/RT1(n); 1.01% CD8/RT1(n) T-lymphocytes; and 3.54% CD45RA/RT1(n) B-lymphocytes. In ACI recipients the chimerism test revealed 10.55% CD4/RT1(a) and 4.59% of CD8/RT1(a) T-lymphocytes. MLR assay at day 160 posttransplant revealed suppressed responses against LBN donor antigens in group 4, but moderate reactivity to ACI donor antigens in group 5. Functional tolerance toward hemifacial allograft transplants induced across MHC barrier using a CsA monotherapy protocol was associated with the presence of donor-specific chimerism in T- and B-cell subpopulations.     

Elimination of donor CD47 protects against vascularized allograft rejection in mice

CD47 is a ubiquitously expressed transmembrane glycoprotein that plays a complex role in regulation of cell survival and function. We have previously shown that the interspecies incompatibility of CD47 plays an important role in triggering rejection of cellular xenografts by macrophages. However, the role of CD47 in solid organ transplantation remains undetermined. Here, we explored this question in mouse models of heart allotransplantation. We observed that the lack of CD47 in donor hearts had no deleterious effect on graft survival in syngeneic or single MHC class I‐mismatched recipients, in which both wild‐type (WT) and CD47 knockout (CD47 KO) mouse hearts survived long term with no sign of rejection. Paradoxically, elimination of donor CD47 was beneficial for graft survival in signal MHC class II‐ and class I‐ plus class II‐mismatched combinations, in which CD47 KO donor hearts showed significantly improved survival compared to WT donor hearts. Similarly, CD47 KO donor hearts were more resistant than WT hearts to humoral rejection in α1,3‐galactosyltransferase‐deficient mice. Moreover, a significant prolongation of WT allografts was observed in recipient mice treated with antibodies against a CD47 ligand thrombospondin‐1 (TSP1) or with TSP1 deficiency, indicating that TSP1‐CD47 signaling may stimulate vascularized allograft rejection. Thus, unlike cellular transplantation, donor CD47 expression may accelerate the rejection of vascularized allografts.     

CTLA4-Ig-based conditioning regimen to induce tolerance to cardiac allografts

BACKGROUND: Transplant rejection and toxicity associated with chronic immunosuppressive therapy remain a major problem. Mixed hematopoietic chimerism has been shown to produce tolerance to solid organ transplants. However, currently available protocols to induce mixed hematopoietic chimerism invariably require toxic pre-conditioning. In this study, we investigated a non-toxic CTLA4-Ig-based protocol to induce donor-specific tolerance to cardiac allografts in rats. METHODS: Fully mismatched, 4 to 6 week old ACI (RT1.A(a)) and Wistar Furth (RT1.A(u)) rats were used as cell/organ donors and recipients, respectively. Recipients were treated with CTLA4-Ig 2 mg/kg/day (on days 0, 2, 4, 6, 8), tacrolimus 1 mg/kg/day (daily, from days 0 to 9), and a single dose of anti-lymphocyte serum (10 mg) on day 10, soon after total body irradiation (300 cGy) and donor bone marrow (100 x 10(6) T-cell depleted cells) transplantation (BMT). Six weeks after BMT, chimeric animals received heterotopic heart transplants. RESULTS: Hematopoietic chimerism was 18.8 +/- 10.6% at day 30, and was stable (24 +/- 10%) at 1 year post-BMT; there was no graft versus host disease. Chimeric recipients (RT1.A(u)) permanently accepted (>360 days) donor-specific (RT1.A(a); n = 6) hearts, yet rapidly rejected (<9 days) third-party hearts (RT1.A(l); n = 5). Graft (heart) tolerant (>100 days) recipients accepted donor-specific secondary skin grafts (>200 days) while rejected the third-party skin grafts (<9 days). Lymphocytes of graft tolerant animals demonstrated hyporesponsiveness in mixed lymphocyte cultures in a donor-specific manner. Tolerant graft histology showed no obliterative arteriopathy or chronic rejection. CONCLUSIONS: The CTLA4-Ig based conditioning regimen with donor BMT produced mixed chimerism and induced donor- specific tolerance to cardiac allografts.     

Antibody‐Mediated Rejection of Single Class I MHC‐Disparate Cardiac Allografts

Murine CCR5^?/? recipients produce high titers of antibody to complete MHC‐mismatched heart and renal allografts. To study mechanisms of class I MHC antibody‐mediated allograft injury, we tested the rejection of heart allografts transgenically expressing a single class I MHC disparity in wild‐type C57BL/6 (H‐2^b) and B6.CCR5^?/? recipients. Donor‐specific antibody titers in CCR5^?/? recipients were 30‐fold higher than in wild‐type recipients. B6.K^d allografts survived longer than 60 days in wild‐type recipients whereas CCR5^?/? recipients rejected all allografts within 14 days. Rejection was accompanied by infiltration of CD8 T cells, neutrophils and macrophages, and C4d deposition in the graft capillaries. B6.K^d allografts were rejected by CD8^?/?/CCR5^?/?, but not μMT^?/?/CCR5^?/?, recipients indicating the need for antibody but not CD8 T cells. Grafts recovered at day 10 from CCR5^?/? and CD8^?/?/CCR5^?/? recipients and from RAG‐1^?/? allograft recipients injected with anti‐K^d antibodies expressed high levels of perforin, myeloperoxidase and CCL5 mRNA. These studies indicate that the continual production of antidonor class I MHC antibody can mediate allograft rejection, that donor‐reactive CD8 T cells synergize with the antibody to contribute to rejection, and that expression of three biomarkers during rejection can occur in the absence of this CD8 T cell activity.     

Effect of mixed hematopoietic chimerism on cardiac allograft survival in cynomolgus monkeys

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported the successful induction of mixed chimerism and long-term acceptance of renal allografts in MHC-mismatched nonhuman primates after nonmyeloablative conditioning and donor bone marrow transplantation. In this study, we extended our regimen to cardiac allotransplantation and compared the immunological responses of heart and kidney allograft recipients. METHODS: Five cynomolgus monkeys were conditioned with low-dose total body irradiation (1.5 Gy on days -6 and -5), supplemental thymic irradiation (7 Gy on day -1), antithymocyte globulin (50 mg/kg on days -2, -1, and 0), splenectomy (day 0), donor bone marrow transplantation (day 0), and a 4-week posttransplant course of cyclosporine. Heart allografts from MHC-mismatched donors were transplanted heterotopically on day 0. RESULTS: Two monkeys failed to develop multilineage chimerism and rejected their allografts soon after cyclosporine was stopped (postoperative days [PODs] 43 and 56). Three monkeys developed multilineage chimerism, which persisted 20 to 43 days posttransplant by flow cytometric analysis and to POD 124 by polymerase chain reaction analysis. Allograft survival in these recipients was prolonged to 138, 428, and 509 days, and in vitro mixed leukocyte reaction and cell-mediated lympholysis (CML) assays demonstrated donor-specific hyporesponsiveness. However, in contrast to kidney allograft recipients, long-term heart allograft recipients eventually developed humoral and cellular immunity against the donor and rejected the grafts. At the time of rejection, 1.3% to 9.5% of donor coronary arteries exhibited intimal proliferation. CONCLUSIONS: The induction of transient mixed hematopoietic chimerism leads to long-term heart allograft survival in MHC disparate monkeys without chronic immunosuppression. However, unlike kidney allografts, full tolerance to cardiac allografts was not achieved. Organ-specific modifications of the preparative regimen may be necessary to prevent the chronic cellular and humoral immune responses elicited by cardiac allografts.     

Induction of transplantation tolerance with a short course of tacrolimus (FK506): I. Rapid and stable tolerance to two-haplotype fully mhc-mismatched kidney allografts in miniature swine

BACKGROUND: Inbred miniature swine provide a large animal model in which the effects of selective major histocompatibility complex (MHC) matching can be reproducibly studied. We have previously demonstrated that although a 12-day course of cyclosporine uniformly induces tolerance to class I-mismatched renal allografts, it does not induce tolerance across full MHC barriers. In this study, we assessed whether and at what dose tacrolimus might permit allografts to induce tolerance across different MHC barriers. METHODS: Recipients of MHC disparate renal allografts were treated with a 12-day course of tacrolimus by continuous intravenous infusion. Groups were divided as follows: (1) class I-mismatched kidneys with 0.3 mg/kg/day tacrolimus (n=3); (2) fully MHC-mismatched kidneys with 0.3 mg/kg/day tacrolimus (n=2); and (3) fully MHC-mismatched kidneys with 0.12-0.16 mg/kg/day tacrolimus (n=4). RESULTS: In groups 1 and 2, recipients with tacrolimus levels of 45-80 ng/ml accepted renal allografts long-term with stable renal function. Donor-specific hyporesponsiveness was demonstrated by cell-mediated lymphocytotoxicity and mixed lymphocyte response, and subsequent donor-matched grafts were also accepted, without further immunosuppression (n=4), confirming systemic tolerance. In group 3, recipients that achieved tacrolimus levels of 35 ng/ml (n=2) accepted their grafts without chronic changes, whereas recipients with levels of 20-26 ng/ml (n=2) developed chronic allograft glomerulopathy, suggesting 35 ng/ml as the threshold blood level for tolerance induction. In vitro assays demonstrated that peripheral blood lymphocytes from tolerant animals produced inhibitory cytokines, suggesting the involvement of regulatory mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this study represents the first demonstration of the induction of transplant tolerance across a two-haplotype full MHC barrier with a short course of immunosuppression in a large animal model. These studies may also have clinical applicability, because the time course required to induce tolerance was sufficiently short that the high drug levels required might be expected to be tolerated clinically with only transient toxicity.     

The Role of Regulatory Cells in Miniature Swine Rendered Tolerant to Cardiac Allografts by Donor Kidney Cotransplantation

To determine the mechanism by which cotransplantation of a kidney allograft induces tolerance to a donor heart in miniature swine, we examined the role of CD25⁺ cells in heart/kidney recipients. Tolerance was induced to class‐I MHC mismatched hearts by cotransplanting a donor‐specific kidney with a 12‐day course of cyclosporine. Peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL) were isolated from tolerant heart/kidney recipients and used in cell‐mediated lympholysis (CML) coculture assays as either unmodified PBL, PBL enriched for CD25⁺ cells or PBL depleted of CD25⁺ cells to assess their ability to suppress CML responses of naïve recipient‐matched leukocytes against mismatched target cells. Primed PBL from tolerant heart/kidney recipients completely suppressed lysis by naïve cells. Complete suppression of the response of naïve recipient‐matched leukocytes against donor‐matched target cells was lost following the depletion of CD25⁺ cells from tolerant heart/kidney animal PBL, but it was reestablished by incubation of naïve cells with small populations of CD25⁺ cells from tolerant heart/kidney animals. These data suggest that peripheral blood from tolerant heart/kidney recipients contains regulatory cells that, upon priming, can suppress the response of naïve‐matched PBL in coculture CML assays, and that suppression appears to be dependent on cells expressing CD25.     

Essential Role of PDL1 Expression on Nonhematopoietic Donor Cells in Acquired Tolerance to Vascularized Cardiac Allografts

The PD1:PDL1 pathway is an essential negative costimulatory pathway that plays a key role in regulating the alloimune response. PDL1 is expressed not only on antigen‐presenting cells (APCs) but also cardiac endothelium. In this study, we investigated the importance of PDL1 expression on donor cardiac allograft in acquired transplantation tolerance in a fully MHC‐mismatched model. We generated PDL1 chimeric mice on B6 background that expressed PDL1 on either hematopoietic cells or nonhematopoietic cells of the heart. Sham animals were used as controls. These hearts were then transplanted into BALB/c recipients and treated with CTLA4‐Ig to induce tolerance. Cardiac endothelium showed significant expression of PDL1, which was upregulated upon transplantation. While the absence of PDL1 on hematopoietic cells of the heart resulted in delayed rejection and prevented long‐term tolerance in most but not all recipients, we observed an accelerated and early graft rejection of all donor allografts that lacked PDL1 on the endothelium. Moreover, PDL1‐deficient endothelium hearts had significant higher frequency of IFN‐γ‐producing alloreactive cells as well as higher frequency of CD8⁺ effector T cells. These findings demonstrate that PDL1 expression mainly on donor endothelium is functionally important in a fully allogeneic mismatched model for the induction of cardiac allograft tolerance.     

Transient Lymphopenia Breaks Costimulatory Blockade‐Based Peripheral Tolerance and Initiates Cardiac Allograft Rejection

Lymphopenia is induced by lymphoablative therapies and chronic viral infections. We assessed the impact of lymphopenia on cardiac allograft survival in recipients conditioned with peritransplant costimulatory blockade (CB) to promote long‐term graft acceptance. After vascularized MHC‐mismatched heterotopic heart grafts were stably accepted through CB, lymphopenia was induced on day 60 posttransplant by 6.5 Gy irradiation or by administration of anti‐CD4 plus anti‐CD8 mAb. Long‐term surviving allografts were gradually rejected after lymphodepletion (MST = 74 ± 5 days postirradiation). Histological analyses indicated signs of severe rejection in allografts following lymphodepletion, including mononuclear cell infiltration and obliterative vasculopathy. Lymphodepletion of CB conditioned recipients induced increases in CD44^high effector/memory T cells in lymphatic organs and strong recovery of donor‐reactive T cell responses, indicating lymphopenia‐induced proliferation (LIP) and donor alloimmune responses occurring in the host. T regulatory (CD4⁺ Foxp³⁺) cell and B cell numbers as well as donor‐specific antibody titers also increased during allograft rejection in CB conditioned recipients given lymphodepletion. These observations suggest that allograft rejection following partial lymphocyte depletion is mediated by LIP of donor‐reactive memory T cells. As lymphopenia may cause unexpected rejection of stable allografts, adequate strategies must be developed to control T cell proliferation and differentiation during lymphopenia.