Laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) has been extensively studied in patients with laryngeal signs and symptoms, gastroesophageal reflux being identified in approximately 50%. Few studies have investigated the incidence and significance of LPR in GERD patients. Two-hundred and seventy-six consecutive patients referred with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux had dual probe 24 h pH, esophageal manometry, GERD and ENT questionnaires. LPR was defined as at least three pharyngeal reflux events less than pH 5.0 with corresponding esophageal reflux, but excluding meal periods. Fourty-two percent of patients were positive for LPR on 24 h pH monitoring and 91.3% corresponded with an abnormal esophageal acid score. Distal esophageal acid exposure was significantly greater (P < 0.001) in patients with LPR but symptoms of GERD and regurgitation scores showed no significant differences between patients with positive and negative LPR on 24 h pH. There was no significant difference between the incidence of LPR in patients with or without laryngeal symptoms. There is a high incidence of LPR in patients with GERD but its significance for laryngeal symptoms is tenuous. Fixed distance dual probe pH monitoring allows documentation of conventional esophageal reflux and LPR.     

Extraesophageal gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms are not more frequently associated with proximal esophageal reflux than typical GERD symptoms

Extraesophageal (EE) symptoms such as cough and throat clearing are common in patients referred for reflux testing, but are less commonly associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Patients with reflux associated EE symptoms often lack typical GERD symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation. Our aim was to compare the frequency of proximal esophageal reflux between esophageal (typical) symptoms and EE (atypical) symptoms. Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH (MII‐pH) tracings were blinded by an investigator so that symptom markers were relabeled with a number without disclosure of symptom type. We selected 40 patients with at least five reflux‐related symptom events for one of four symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, cough, or throat clearing). A blinded investigator analyzed all 200 reflux episodes, reporting the proximal esophageal extent of the reflux for all symptoms. The percentage of symptom‐related reflux extending proximally to 17 cm above the LES was similar among all four symptom types. At least 50% of all symptoms were associated with proximal esophageal reflux to 17 cm, with regurgitation having the highest frequency at 60%. Our data indicate that EE symptoms are not more frequently associated with proximal esophageal reflux than typical esophageal symptoms.     

Tolerance to H2 receptor antagonist correlates well with the decline in efficacy against gastroesophageal reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The attenuated antisecretory activity of H2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) during continuous administration is known as the tolerance phenomenon. The authors recently clarified that presence or absence of Helicobacter pylori infection influences the occurrence of the tolerance phenomenon. The aim of this study was to clarify whether tolerance to H2RA is correlated with attenuation of the inhibitory effect against gastroesophageal acid reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: Ten male patients with GERD symptoms and abnormal gastroesophageal reflux were investigated by pH monitoring on days 1 and 15 of continuous oral famotidine administration at 20 mg twice daily, and H. pylori infection was examined using the urea breath test. RESULTS: Intragastric and intraesophageal acidity were significantly decreased on the first day of famotidine administration, but then increased during the 15-day administration period in seven patients who were negative for H. pylori. In contrast, the efficacy of famotidine against gastric acid secretion and gastroesophageal acid reflux was not attenuated in three H. pylori-positive patients. The changes in GERD symptoms were correlated with the change in the degree of gastroesophageal reflux. CONCLUSION: The presence or absence of tolerance to H2RA during 15-day administration is correlated with the efficacy for inhibition of gastroesophageal acid reflux.     

Correlation of 24-hr esophageal pH patterns with clinical features and endoscopy in gastroesophageal reflux disease

We performed 24-hr ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring in north Indian patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and correlated it with symptom severity and endoscopic abnormalities. Thirty-six consecutive patients with symptomatic GERD and 16 healthy volunteers underwent objective grading of clinical symptoms and endoscopic findings. Total, supine, and upright reflux periods as well as frequency and duration of reflux episodes were determined from the 24-hr pH-metry record using standard software. This was abnormal in 32 patients, who could be categorized into upright refluxers (31.2%), supine refluxers (34.4%), and combined refluxers (34.4%). Supine reflux and upright reflux were distinct entities that did not correlate with each other (r=0.22,P=NS). In upright refluxers, symptoms (P<0.02) and=" endoscopic=" abnormalities=">P<0.005) were=" milder=" than=" in=" combined=" refluxers.=" total=" duration=" of=" acid=" exposure=" correlated=" significantly=" with=" severity=" of=" symptoms=">P<0.001) and=" endoscopic=" esophagitis=">P<0.005). patients=" with=" gerd=" had=" three=" distinct=" patterns=" of=" abnormal=" gastroesophageal=" reflux,=" with=" upright=" refluxers=" having=" milder=" disease=" and=" supine=" and=" combined=" refluxers=" having=" more=" severe=" disease.=" this=" may=" reflect=" differences=" in=" underlying=" mechanisms=" of=">     

Evaluation of esophageal function in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease using transnasal endoscopy

Background and Aims:  To investigate the utility of a new method of carrying out esophageal manometry using a narrow gauge manometry catheter via a transnasal endoscope.
Methods:  The Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (FSSG), a GERD-specific questionnaire, was given to 45 subjects. Subjects 
underwent transnasal endoscopy with three dry and three wet (3 mL water) swallows. Direct observations of the primary peristaltic wave and peristaltic pressure measurement were conducted simultaneously.
Results:  Endoscopic observation of lower esophageal motility associated with swallowing revealed dilatation of the esophageal lumen after swallowing, followed by contraction in association with the primary peristaltic wave. The peristaltic pressure was significantly lower with increased FSSG scores for dry swallows ( r  = −0.347, P  = 0.0212), but no significant correlation was seen for wet swallows.
Conclusions:  The significant negative correlation between reflux symptoms and peristaltic pressure in dry swallows was thought to be that reduced pressure immediately rostral to the lower esophageal sphincter leads to decreased clearance following gastric acid reflux, playing a large part in the onset of symptoms.     

Reliability of 24-hour home esophageal ph monitoring in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux

Twenty-four-hour home esophageal pH monitoring is proposed in order to study gastroesophageal reflux (GER) so that prolonged use of costly hospital equipment and staff can be curtailed and the diagnostic accuracy of the examination improved. Eighty-six patients affected by GER symptoms and 20 healthy volunteers underwent 24-hr home esophageal pH monitoring, x-rays, and endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract to investigate reliability of outpatient recording. Fifteen more patients consecutively underwent out- and inpatient recording to detect possible differences between these methods in the two daily periods. Outpatient monitoring was well tolerated in 94.7% of the patients; 14.3% of them markedly reduced their routine activities. The range of normality of outpatient recording does not differ from that of inpatients. In the 15 patients who consecutively underwent out-and inpatient monitoring, no significant differences were reported. The sensitivity of 24-hr home esophageal pH recording is 0.85, the specificity 1, the accuracy for negative prediction 0.68, and the accuracy for positive prediction 1. The reliability of 24-hr home esophageal pH monitoring is comparable to inpatient recording. It allows hospital cost reduction and is also better tolerated by patients but has not greatly improved the diagnostic accuracy of the gastroesophageal reflux pH monitoring.Supported by the Ministere Pubblica Istruzione, Rome; and Finanziamenti per studi e ricerche 40%, Com. 06, Cat 12-07 imp. 11515, University of Bologna.     

Comparison of patients of chronic laryngitis with and without troublesome reflux symptoms

Background and Aim: Little is known about the difference between patients of chronic laryngitis with and without troublesome reflux symptoms. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics and response to acid suppression between patients of chronic laryngitis with and without troublesome reflux symptoms. Methods: Consecutive patients with chronic laryngitis were enrolled. The frequency and severity of reflux and laryngeal symptoms were scored. All the patients underwent laryngoscopy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy and 24‐h multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring before receiving rabeprazole 10 mg b.i.d. for 3 months. Mild typical reflux symptoms (heartburn or regurgitation) occurring ≥ 2 days/week or moderate/severe symptoms occurring ≥ 1 day/week were defined as troublesome reflux symptoms. Results: Compared to patients without troublesome reflux symptoms, those with troublesome reflux symptoms were older and had more episodes of acid and liquid gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and acid and weakly acidic laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). They also had higher percentages of both bolus exposure time and acid exposure time of GER and LPR. Patients with troublesome reflux symptoms responded to acid suppression more often at 12 weeks (67.3% vs 20.9%, P < 0.001) and more rapidly (40.8% vs 14.0%, 3 weeks after the start of acid suppression; P = 0.004) compared to those without. Conclusion: Difference in reflux profile of GER and LPR between patients with and without troublesome reflux symptoms could partly explain the discrepancy of response to acid suppression among patients with chronic laryngitis. Acid suppression therapy may provide limited therapeutic benefits to patients of chronic laryngitis without troublesome reflux symptoms.     

十二指肠胃食管反流在胃食管反流病中的作用

目的　研究十二指肠胃食管反流 (DGER)在胃食管反流病发病机制中的作用及其对非糜烂性反流病 (NERD)的诊断价值。方法　 95例患者根据内镜检查的结果分为反流性食管炎和NERD组 ,对其均进行 2 4h食管 pH和胆汁联合监测。 结果　反流性食管炎患者DGER的各项指标 :吸光度值 >0 14时间百分比 (% )、总反流次数和反流 >5min的次数分别为 19 0 5± 2 3 4 4、30 5 6±34 0 4和 5 90± 6 37,均显著高于NERD组相应的 7 2 6± 11 0 8、15 6 8± 2 0 92和 2 5 9± 3 5 7(P <0 0 5 ) ,而酸反流差异无显著性 ,随着反流性食管炎的程度加重DGER发生率增高 ;18 2 %的NERD患者存在单纯DGER ,联合胆汁监测可使NERD诊断阳性率由 6 5 9%升高到 84 1%。结论　DGER可以单独发生 ,在引起反流性食管黏膜损伤或症状方面都有作用 ,2 4h食管 pH和胆汁联合监测有助于NERD的诊断。     

Esophageal striated muscle contractions in patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms

Although there are studies showing that the amplitude of contraction in the distal esophageal body may be lower in gastroesophageal reflux (GER) disease than in asymptomatic subjects, there are no data about proximal striated muscle contraction in this disease. We studied the esophageal contraction 2 or 3 cm below the upper esophageal sphincter in response to swallowing a 5-ml bolus of water in 122 consecutive patients submitted to esophageal manometry who complained of heartburn and acid regurgitation. Sixty-nine had esophagitis seen at endoscopy. Thirty-three also complained of dysphagia. No patients had esophageal stenosis, esophageal motility abnormalities in distal esophagus, chest pain, or extraesophageal manifestations of GER. We also studied 20 patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), a disease with no involvement of striated muscle. When we measured the amplitude, duration, and area under the curve (AUC) of the proximal esophageal contraction, we did not find any differences (P > 0.05) between patients with esophagitis (N = 69) or without esophagitis (N = 53), with dysphagia (N = 33) or without dysphagia (N = 89), with mild (N = 55) or severe (N = 14) esophagitis, or younger than 40 years (N = 45) or older than 60 years (N = 19). There was also no difference between patients with GER symptoms and patients with SSc (P > 0.05). We conclude that patients with GER symptoms with or without esophagitis and with or without dysphagia have similar esophageal striated muscle contractions.     

Ambulatory intraesophageal bilirubin monitoring in Japanese patients with gastroesophageal reflux

Background: The role of reflux of duodenal contents in gastroesophageal reflux in Japanese patients, which may be different from that in Western patients, was studied. Methods: Intraesophageal pH and the bilirubin concentration were monitored, using the Bilitec 2000, in 43 patients with reflux symptoms and 10 normal volunteers. The percentage of the time that spectrophotometric absorbence was 0.15 or more and pH was less than 4.0 was defined as the holding times (HTs) of bilirubin and acid, respectively. Severity of esophagitis was classified using the Savary-Miller (S-M) classification. Results: Esophagitis was present in 37 patients; 5, 10, 13, and 9 patients had S-M grades 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Both HTs in the volunteers were less than 5%. Bilirubin HT was more than 5% in 3 of the 6 patients without esophagitis, but the acid HT was less than 5% in these 6 patients. Acid HT was less than 5% in 4, 2, 2, and 2 patients with S-M grades 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Bilirubin HT was less than 5% in 1 patient with S-M grade 2 esophagitis. Bilirubin HT in patients with S-M grades 3 and 4 esophagitis (50.9 ± 5.8%) was higher than that in grades 1 and 2 (14.9 ± 2.9%) (P < 0.0001), but this was not so for acid HT. In 32 patients, bilirubin HT exceeded acid HT. Bilirubin HT did not correlate with acid HT. Conclusions: Duodenogastroesophageal reflux occurred independently of and exceeded acid reflux. The amount of duodenogastroesophageal reflux correlated with the severity of esophagitis. Received: October 22, 2001 / Accepted: January 25, 2002 Reprint requests to: H. Osugi     

Saliva transit in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

Saliva is an important factor in the neutralization of the acidity of the refluxed material that comes from the stomach to the esophagus. The impairment of saliva transit from oral cavity to distal esophagus may be one of the causes of esophagitis and symptoms in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). With the scintigraphic method, the transit of 2 mL of artificial saliva was measured in 30 patients with GERD and 26 controls. The patients with GERD had symptoms of heartburn and acid regurgitation, a 24‐hour pH monitoring with more than 4.2% of the time with pH below four, 26 with erosive esophagitis, and four with non‐erosive reflux disease. Fourteen had mild dysphagia for solid foods. Twenty‐one patients had normal esophageal manometry, and nine had ineffective esophageal motility. They were 15 men and 15 women, aged 21–61 years, mean 39 years. The control group had 14 men and 12 women, aged 19–61 years, mean 35 years. The subjects swallowed in the sitting and supine position 2 mL of artificial saliva labeled with 18 MBq of ^99mTechnetium phytate. The time of saliva transit was measured from oral cavity to esophageal‐gastric transition, from proximal esophagus to esophageal‐gastric transition, and the transit through proximal, middle, and distal esophageal body. There was no difference between patients and controls in the time for saliva to go from oral cavity to esophageal‐gastric transition, and from proximal esophagus to esophageal‐gastric transition, in the sitting and supine positions. In distal esophagus in the sitting position, the saliva transit duration was shorter in patients with GERD (3.0 ± 0.8 seconds) than in controls (7.6 ± 1.7 seconds, P = 0.03). In conclusion, the saliva transit from oral cavity to the esophageal‐gastric transition in patients with GERD has the same duration than in controls. Saliva transit through the distal esophageal body is faster in patients with GERD than controls.     

胡桃夹食管36例特点分析

目的探讨伴有胃食管反流病的胡桃夹食管患者的临床表现及食管动力学特点。方法回顾分析并比较2002—2007年首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院消化内科收治的36例胡桃夹食管患者[其中伴胃食管反流病者11例(GERD组);不伴胃食管反流病者25例(non-GERD组)]的临床资料及食管动力学特点。结果临床症状发生率两组差异无统计学意义;在食管动力学检查上,两组LES松弛率差异有统计学意义,而LES压力、食管中下段蠕动波幅、时限及传导性蠕动比例等方面差异无统计学意义;两组DeMeester积分差异有统计学意义。结论食管压力测定及24 h动态pH监测是诊断胡桃夹食管及其是否伴有胃食管反流病的有效方法。     

Inclusion of supine period in short-duration pH monitoring is essential in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Prolonged esophageal pH monitoring is the most accurate method for detecting abnormal gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, some investigators have found that short-duration postprandial pH monitoring in the upright position is also useful, while others have failed to find such results. Therefore, we have compared a 6-hr period of pH monitoring (3-hr postprandial period after daytime meal and 3-hr supine period) with a total 24-hr period in detecting abnormal gastroesophageal reflux. Sixty-five patients (44 men, mean age 41.3 years) with GERD and 16 healthy volunteers (11 men, mean age 34.3 years) underwent 24-hr pH monitoring according to a standard protocol. Various reflux parameters during 24-hr pH monitoring were compared with reflux parameters during the 6-hr period. Abnormal GER was detected in 56 patients presenting with typical symptoms of GERD (sensitivity 86.2%). These patients could be further divided into upright (N=18), supine (N=15), and combined (N=23) refluxers, depending on the posture in which abnormal reflux occurred. Esophageal pH monitoring during the 3-hr postprandial upright period showed abnormal reflux in only 35 patients (sensitivity 53.8%;P<0.00005, compared with the 24-hr pH monitoring period). Abnormal GER was identified in 13 of 18 upright, 19 of 23 combined, and only one of 15 supine refluxers, as well as in two of nine patients with normal 24-hr pH-metry. However, inclusion of the 3-hr supine monitoring period in the 3-hr postprandial upright period improved detection of abnormal GER to 78.5% (51 patients;P=NS compared with 24-hr pH monitoring period). This was related mainly to improved detection of abnormal GER in supine refluxers (11 of 15; 73.3%). Esophageal acid exposure time correlated significantly with severity of esophagitis only during the total and supine periods of both the 24- and 6-hr periods and not during the upright period. Esophageal acid clearance correlated significantly with increasing grades of esophagitis for the supine and total periods only. We conclude that 3-hr postprandial pH monitoring, as has been conventionally practiced, is not appropriate in the detection of abnormal GER; inclusion of a supine period in the short-duration pH monitoring schedule increases the detection of pathological reflux. We therefore recommend that a supine period should be included in short-duration pH monitoring schedules. We also found that supine reflux was the most important factor in the development of esophagitis.     

Factors predictive of gastroesophageal reflux disease and esophageal motility disorders in patients with non-cardiac chest pain

Background: Patients with non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) are referred for esophageal motility testing and pH monitoring since gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and esophageal motility disorders are frequently encountered in these patients. Our aim was to determine the prevalence and distribution of these disorders and to identify predictors of abnormal esophageal function testing.

Methods: We performed a retrospective study of NCCP patients who presented after a negative cardiac evaluation and underwent esophageal manometry, esophageal pH monitoring and upper endoscopy from January 2010 to January 2017.

Key results: In a total of 177 patients, esophageal motility disorders were diagnosed in 31% and GERD in 35% of the patients. The most common diagnoses were ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) in 14.1%, jackhammer esophagus in 6.8%, diffuse esophageal spasm in 5.1% and achalasia in 2.3% patients. Older age [for every 5-year increment, odds ratio (OR) 1.2 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.00–1.3) p?=?.047] and dysphagia [OR 3.8 (95% CI, 1.9–7.5) p?p?=?.032] was predictive of GERD. Abnormal esophageal testing was associated with male gender [OR 2.2 (95% CI, 1.04–4.6) p?=?.039], older age [for every 5-year increment, OR 1.2 (95% CI, 1.03–1.3) p?=?.016] and Caucasian race [OR 3.1 (95% CI, 1.1–8.7) p?Conclusions: Approximately two thirds of patients presenting with NCCP have GERD or esophageal motility disorders. Esophageal function testing in NCCP should be considered in older patients, men, Caucasians and those presenting with dysphagia.     

Fasting and postprandial mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease

In order to define the mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in children, we performed simultaneous intraluminal, esophageal motility and pH studies in 24 children with symptomatic reflux and abnormal prolonged pH probe study, ten (group A) without endoscopic and histologic esophagitis, 14 (group B) with endoscopic and histologic esophagitis. Median (ranges) age (years) was 5.0 (6 months-10 years) and 3.0 (6 months-12 years), respectively. Recordings were done for 1 hr before and 1 hr after feeding apple juice (15 ml/kg; pH 4.0). All episodes of GER in group A patients and 77.1% in group B patients were accounted for by abrupt transient lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation (TLESR); 22.9% of reflux events in group B patients occurred during gradual drifts of LES pressure (LESP) to undetectable levels. Esophageal refluxate exposure (mean percentage time with esophageal pH<4.0) the rate of TLESR (number of episodes/hr), and the percentage of TLESRs associated with reflux significantly increased in the fed period both in group A (18.5±5.4%, 6.2±2.65, 87.1%) and in group B (29.7±6.5 7.8±3.05, 84.9%) as compared to the fasting state (group A: 10.8±3.9, 3.9±3.17, 46.1%; group B: 16.1±2.6, 4.14±3.06, 55.17%) (p<0.01). The rate of LESP drifts (number of episodes/hr) was also significantly higher postprandially (4.85±1.24 vs 1.8±0.9,p<0.01); furthermore there was a postfeeding increase of the LESP drift percentage associated with reflux (79.41% vs 46.15%,p<0.01). Residual pressure of TLESRs associated with reflux was significantly lower than that of TLESRs without GER in both groups of patients, during fasting (group A:p<0.01; group B:p<0.05) and fed state (p<0.05), whereas duration of relaxation and LESP in the 1-min period before each TLESR did not discriminate TLESRs associated with reflux from those without reflux. In children with GER disease, TLESR is the most common mechanism of reflux, but gradual LESP drift is associated with more severe disease; the postprandial increase in the esophageal acid exposure is mainly due to increased rate of TLESRs and LESP drifts; degree of sphincter inhibition during TLESRs is a critical factor for the induction of reflux.Presented in part at the 91st Annual Meeting of the American Gastroenterological Association, San Antonio, Texas, May 12–18, 1990.     

一氧化氮在胃食管反流病发病机制中的作用

目的探讨一氧化氮(NO)在胃食管反流病(GERD)发病机制中的作用.方法应用PC polygraf HR高分辨多通道测压系统检测GERD患者的食管下括约肌压力(LESP)、食管下括约肌长度(LESL)及食管远端蠕动幅度等动力参数;应用Digitrapper MKⅢ动态食管pH监测仪检测其24 h食管内pH各项参数;应用硝酸还原酶法测定血清NO含量.结果与对照组比较,Savary Mller Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ级GERD患者的LESP均显著降低(分别为1.1kPa±0.11kPa,1.1kPa±0.06kPa,1.0kPa±0.08kPa,P均＜0.01);Savary Miller Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ级GERD患者的食管下段蠕动幅度也均显著降低(分别为7.7kPa±1.1kPa,7.2kPa±1.3kPa,6.9kPa±1.2kPa,P均＜0.01);GERD患者的食管内24 h pH值明显高于对照组;其血清NO含量也显著高于对照组.结论内源性NO可能参与GERD的致病机制.