Reactive hypoglycaemia following GLP‐1 infusion in pancreas transplant recipients

The aim of the study was to determine whether reactive hypoglycaemia in pancreas transplant recipients that followed administration of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) was associated with excessive insulin, insufficient glucagon, or both. Methodology involved six portally drained pancreas recipients who received GLP‐1 (1.5 pmol/kg/min) or placebo infusion on randomized occasions during glucose‐potentiated arginine testing. The second subject developed symptomatic hypoglycaemia [plasma glucose (PG) 42 mg/dl] 1 h after GLP‐1 administration; subsequent subjects received intravenous glucose following GLP‐1, but not placebo, infusion for PG levels <65 mg/dl. Following GLP‐1 vs. placebo infusion, PG was lower (58 ± 4 vs. 76 ± 5 mg/dl; p < 0.05) despite administration of intravenous glucose. During hypoglycaemia, insulin levels and the insulin‐to‐glucagon ratio were greater after GLP‐1 vs. placebo infusion (p < 0.05), while glucagon did not vary. It can be concluded from the study that GLP‐1 can induce reactive hypoglycaemia in pancreas transplant recipients through excessive insulin secretion associated with an increased insulin‐to‐glucagon ratio.     

Short‐acting glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists as add‐on to insulin therapy in type 1 diabetes: A review

A large proportion of patients with type 1 diabetes do not reach their glycaemic target of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and, furthermore, an increasing number of patients with type 1 diabetes are overweight and obese. Treatment of type 1 diabetes is based on insulin therapy, which is associated with well‐described and unfortunate adverse effects such as hypoglycaemia and increased body weight. Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) receptor agonists (RAs) are the focus of increasing interest as a possible adjunctive treatment to insulin in type 1 diabetes because of their glucagonostatic and extrapancreatic effects. So far, the focus has mainly been on the long‐acting GLP‐1RAs, but the risk–benefit ratio emerging from studies evaluating the effect of long‐acting GLP‐1RAs as adjunctive therapy to insulin therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes has been disappointing. This might be attributable to a lack of glucagonostatic effect of these long‐acting GLP‐1RAs in type 1 diabetes, alongside development of tachyphylaxis to GLP‐1‐induced retardation of gastric emptying. In contrast, the short‐acting GLP‐1RAs seem to have a preserved and sustained effect on glucagon secretion and gastric emptying in patients with type 1 diabetes, which could translate into effective lowering of postprandial glucose excursions; however, these observations regarding short‐acting GLP‐1RAs are all derived from small open‐label trials and should thus be interpreted with caution. In the present paper we review the potential role of GLP‐1RAs, in particular short‐acting GLP‐1RAs, as add‐on to insulin in the treatment of type 1 diabetes.     

Incretin therapies: highlighting common features and differences in the modes of action of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors

Over the last few years, incretin‐based therapies have emerged as important agents in the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). These agents exert their effect via the incretin system, specifically targeting the receptor for the incretin hormone glucagon‐like peptide 1 (GLP‐1), which is partly responsible for augmenting glucose‐dependent insulin secretion in response to nutrient intake (the ‘incretin effect’). In patients with T2D, pharmacological doses/concentrations of GLP‐1 can compensate for the inability of diabetic β cells to respond to the main incretin hormone glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, and this is therefore a suitable parent compound for incretin‐based glucose‐lowering medications. Two classes of incretin‐based therapies are available: GLP‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1RAs) and dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) inhibitors. GLP‐1RAs promote GLP‐1 receptor (GLP‐1R) signalling by providing GLP‐1R stimulation through ‘incretin mimetics’ circulating at pharmacological concentrations, whereas DPP‐4 inhibitors prevent the degradation of endogenously released GLP‐1. Both agents produce reductions in plasma glucose and, as a result of their glucose‐dependent mode of action, this is associated with low rates of hypoglycaemia; however, there are distinct modes of action resulting in differing efficacy and tolerability profiles. Furthermore, as their actions are not restricted to stimulating insulin secretion, these agents have also been associated with additional non‐glycaemic benefits such as weight loss, improvements in β‐cell function and cardiovascular risk markers. These attributes have made incretin therapies attractive treatments for the management of T2D and have presented physicians with an opportunity to tailor treatment plans. This review endeavours to outline the commonalities and differences among incretin‐based therapies and to provide guidance regarding agents most suitable for treating T2D in individual patients.     

Twelve weeks treatment with the DPP‐4 inhibitor,sitagliptin, prevents degradation of peptide YY and improves glucose and non‐glucose induced insulin secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Aim: To examine the effects of 12 weeks of treatment with the DPP‐4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, on gastrointestinal hormone responses to a standardized mixed meal and beta cell secretory capacity, measured as glucose and non‐glucose induced insulin secretion during a hyperglycaemic clamp, in patients with type 2 diabetes. Method: A double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled study over 12 weeks in which 24 patients with T2DM were randomized to receive either sitagliptin (Januvia) 100 mg qd or placebo as an add‐on therapy to metformin. In week 0, 1 and 12 patients underwent a meal test and a 90‐min 20 mM hyperglycaemic clamp with 5 g of l ‐arginine infusion. Main outcome measure was postprandial total glucagon‐like peptide 1 (GLP‐1) concentration. Additional measures were insulin and C‐peptide, glycaemic control, intact and total peptide YY (PYY) and glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), and intact glucagon‐like peptide 2 (GLP‐2) and GLP‐1. Results: All patients [sitagliptin n = 12, age: 59.5 (39–64) years, HbA1c: 8.0 (7.3–10.0)%, BMI: 33.2 (29.3–39.4); placebo n = 12, age: 60 (31–72) years, HbA1c: 7.7 (7.1–9.8)%, BMI: 30.7 (25.7–40.5)] [median (range)] completed the trial. Sitagliptin treatment improved glycaemic control, had no effect on total GLP‐1, GIP or intact GLP‐2, but reduced total PYY and PYY_{3‐ 36}, and increased PYY_{1‐ 36} and intact incretin hormones. Sitagliptin improved first and second phases of beta cell secretion and maximal secretory capacity. All effects were achieved after 1 week. No significant changes occurred in the placebo group. Conclusion: The postprandial responses of total GLP‐1 and GIP and intact GLP‐2 were unaltered. PYY degradation was prevented. Glucose and non‐glucose induced beta cell secretion was improved. There was no difference in responses to sitagliptin between 1 and 12 weeks of treatment.     

GLP‐1 receptor agonists: effects on the progression of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease

Non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common liver diseases, and its incidence has been increasing recently. In addition to hepatic complications, NAFLD is also recognized as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Unfortunately, the current therapies for NAFLD display variable efficacy; a novel and effective drug is urgently needed. Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1), a receptor agonist is a new drug approved for treating type 2 diabetes. Recently, these types of agents have shown a novel therapeutic effect on NAFLD. However, the mechanisms of GLP‐1 receptor agonists on the treatment of NAFLD have not yet been explained precisely. Recent studies have demonstrated that GLP‐1 reverses the progression of NAFLD not only indirectly through an incretin effect that improves key parameters involved in NAFLD, but also a direct effect on lipid metabolism of hepatocytes and inflammation in liver. In this review, we provided an overview of the role and mechanisms of GLP‐1 in the therapy of NAFLD. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Engineering and characterization of the long‐acting glucagon‐like peptide‐1 analogue LY2189265, an Fc fusion protein

Background

Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) receptor agonists are novel agents for type 2 diabetes treatment, offering glucose‐dependent insulinotropic effects, reduced glucagonemia and a neutral bodyweight or weight‐reducing profile. However, a short half‐life (minutes), secondary to rapid inactivation by dipeptidyl peptidase‐IV (DPP‐IV) and excretion, limits the therapeutic potential of the native GLP‐1 hormone. Recently, the GLP‐1 receptor agonist exenatide injected subcutaneously twice daily established a novel therapy class. Developing long‐acting and efficacious GLP‐1 analogues represents a pivotal research goal. We developed a GLP‐1 immunoglobulin G (IgG4) Fc fusion protein (LY2189265) with extended pharmacokinetics and activity.

Methods

In vitro and in vivo activity of LY2189265 was characterized in rodent and primate cell systems and animal models.

Results

LY2189265 retained full receptor activity in vitro and elicited insulinotropic activity in islets similar to native peptide. Half‐life in rats and cynomolgus monkeys was 1.5–2 days, and serum immunoreactivity representing active compound persisted > 6 days. In rats, LY2189265 enhanced insulin responses during graded glucose infusion 24 h after one dose. LY2189265 increased glucose tolerance in diabetic mice after one dose and lowered weight and delayed hyperglycaemia when administered twice weekly for 4 weeks. In monkeys, LY2189265 significantly increased glucose‐dependent insulin secretion for up to a week after one dose, retained efficacy when administered subchronically (once weekly for 4 weeks) and was well tolerated.

Conclusions

LY2189265 retains the effects of GLP‐1 with increased half‐life and efficacy, supporting further evaluation as a once‐weekly treatment of type 2 diabetes. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Glucagon-like peptide 1(GLP-1) in biology and pathology

Post-translational proteolytic processing of the preproglucagon gene in the gut results in the formation of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). Owing to its glucose-dependent insulinotropic effect, this hormone was postulated to primarily act as an incretin, i.e. to augment insulin secretion after oral glucose or meal ingestion. In addition, GLP-1 decelerates gastric emptying and suppresses glucagon secretion. Under physiological conditions, GLP-1 acts as a part of the 'ileal brake', meaning that is slows the transition of nutrients into the distal gut. Animal studies suggest a role for GLP-1 in the development and growth of the endocrine pancreas. In light of its multiple actions throughout the body, different therapeutic applications of GLP-1 are possible. Promising results have been obtained with GLP-1 in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, but its potential to reduce appetite and food intake may also allow its use for the treatment of obesity. While rapid in vivo degradation of GLP-1 has yet prevented its broad clinical use, different pharmacological approaches aiming to extend the in vivo half-life of GLP-1 or to inhibit its inactivation are currently being evaluated. Therefore, antidiabetic treatment based on GLP-1 may become available within the next years. This review will summarize the biological effects of GLP-1, characterize its role in human biology and pathology, and discuss potential clinical applications as well as current clinical studies.     

GLP-1: physiological effects and potential therapeutic applications

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) is a gut-derived incretin hormone with the potential to change diabetes. The physiological effects of GLP-1 are multiple, and many seem to ameliorate the different conditions defining the diverse physiopathology seen in type 2 diabetes. In animal studies, GLP-1 stimulates beta-cell proliferation and neogenesis and inhibits beta-cell apoptosis. In humans, GLP-1 stimulates insulin secretion and inhibits glucagon and gastrointestinal secretions and motility. It enhances satiety and reduces food intake and has beneficial effects on cardiovascular function and endothelial dysfunction. Enhancing incretin action for therapeutic use includes GLP-1 receptor agonists resistant to degradation (incretin mimetics) and dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors. In clinical trials with type 2 diabetic patients on various oral antidiabetic regimes, both treatment modalities efficaciously improve glycaemic control and beta-cell function. Whereas the incretin mimetics induce weight loss, the DPP-4 inhibitors are considered weight neutral. In type 1 diabetes, treatment with GLP-1 shows promising effects. However, several areas need clinical confirmation: the durability of the weight loss, the ability to preserve functional beta-cell mass and the applicability in other than type 2 diabetes. As such, long-term studies and studies with cardiovascular end-points are needed to confirm the true benefits of these new classes of antidiabetic drugs in the treatment of diabetes mellitus.     

Improved glycaemic control with minimal hypoglycaemia and no weight change with the once‐daily human glucagon‐like peptide‐1 analogue liraglutide as add‐on to sulphonylurea in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes

Aim: Sulphonylureas (SUs) are often used as first‐line treatments for type 2 diabetes in Japan, hence it is important to study new antidiabetic drugs in combination with SUs in Japanese patients. Methods: The efficacy and safety of the once‐daily human glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) analogue liraglutide were compared in 264 Japanese subjects [mean body mass index (BMI) 24.9 kg/m²; mean glycated haemoglobin (HBA1c) 8.4%] randomized and exposed to receive liraglutide 0.6 mg/day (n = 88), 0.9 mg/day (n = 88) or placebo (n = 88) each added to SU monotherapy (glibenclamide, glicazide or glimeprimide) in a 24‐week, double‐blind, parallel‐group trial. Results: The mean change in HBA1c from baseline to week 24 (LOCF) was ?1.56 (s.d. 0.84) and ?1.46 (s.d. 0.95) with liraglutide 0.9 and 0.6 mg respectively, and ?0.40 (s.d. 0.93) with placebo. HBA1c decreased in the placebo group from 8.45 to 8.06%, while liraglutide reduced HBA1c from 8.60 to 7.14%, and from 8.23 to 6.67% at the 0.6 and 0.9 mg doses respectively. Mean HBA1c at week 24 of the two liraglutide groups were significantly lower than the placebo group (p < 0.0001 for both). More subjects reached HBA1c < 7.0% with liraglutide (0.6 mg: 46.5%; 0.9 mg: 71.3%) vs. placebo (14.8%). Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels were significantly improved with liraglutide (difference ?1.47 mmol/l and ?1.80 mmol/l with 0.6 and 0.9 mg vs. placebo; p < 0.0001). Overall safety was similar between treatments: no major hypoglycaemic episodes were reported, while 84/77/38 minor hypoglycaemic episodes occurred in the 0.6 mg/0.9 mg and placebo treatment groups (all in combination with SU), reflecting lower ambient glucose levels. No relevant change in mean body weight occurred in subjects receiving liraglutide (0.6 mg: 0.06 kg; 0.9 mg: ?0.37 kg), while mean body weight decreased in subjects receiving placebo (?1.12 kg). Conclusions: The addition of liraglutide to SU treatment for 24 weeks dose‐dependently improved glycaemic control vs. SU monotherapy, without causing major hypoglycaemia or weight gain or loss.     

Free and fixed‐ratio combinations of basal insulin and GLP‐1 receptor agonists versus basal insulin intensification in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

A meta‐analysis is presented of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing free or fixed combinations of a glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist plus basal insulin versus insulin intensification on metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Electronic databases were searched for RCTs assessing changes in HbA1c, proportion of patients at HbA1c target of <7% (53 mmol/mol), hypoglycaemia and body weight. A random‐effect model was used to calculate the weighted mean difference (WMD) or relative risk (RR) with 95% CI. Eleven RCTs were identified, lasting 24–30 weeks and involving 6176 patients. In the overall analysis, the combination therapy led to a mean HbA1c decrease significantly greater than insulin up‐titration (WMD ?0.53%, 95% CI, ?0.66, ?0.40%, P < 0.001), more patients at HbA1c target (RR 1.69, 95% CI, 1.42, 2.00, P < 0.001), similar hypoglycaemic events (RR 0.97, 95% CI, 0.84, 1.12, P = 0.114), and reduction in body weight (WMD ?1.9, 95% CI ?2.3, ?1.4, P < 0.001), with heterogeneity (I² > 71%, P < 0.001). Results did not differ in either the free or fixed combination subgroups. Combination strategies, either free or fixed, represent a good option for intensifying basal insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes who need amelioration of glycaemic control.     

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists versus insulin in inadequately controlled patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of clinical trials

To compare the effect and safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) with insulin therapy on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients inadequately controlled with metformin and/or sulfonylurea. A systematic literature search on MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted using specific search terms 'GLP-1 insulin type 2 diabetes clinical trials' and eight eligible studies were retrieved. Data on mean change in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1C), weight loss, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), incidence of hypoglycaemia and gastrointestinal adverse events were extracted from each study and pooled in meta-analysis. Data on postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) and adverse events were also described or tabulated. Data from eight RCTs enrolling 2782 patients were pooled using a random-effects model. The mean net change [95% confidence interval (CIs)] for HbA1c, weight loss and FPG for patients treated with GLP-1 RA as compared with insulin was -0.14% (-2 mmol/mol) [95% CI; (-0.27, -0.02)%; p = 0.03]; -4.40 kg [95% CI; (-5.23, -3.56) kg; p < 0.01] and 1.18 mmol/l [95% CI; (0.43, 1.93) mmol/l; p < 0.01], respectively, with negative values favouring GLP-1 and positive values favouring insulin. The GLP-1 group was associated with a greater reduction in PPG than the insulin group. Overall, hypoglycaemia was reported less in the GLP-1 group [Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio (M-H OR) 0.45 (0.27, 0.76); p < 0.01], while there was no significant difference in occurrence of severe hypoglycaemia [M-H OR 0.65 (0.29,1.45); p = 0.29]. A significantly higher number of gastrointestinal adverse events were reported with GLP-1 group [M-H OR 15.00 (5.44,41.35) p < 0.01]. GLP-1 RA are promising new agents compared with insulin. Further prospective clinical trials are expected to fully evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of these therapies within the T2DM treatment paradigm.