Everolimus With Reduced Tacrolimus Improves Renal Function in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

In a prospective, multicenter, open‐label study, de novo liver transplant patients were randomized at day 30±5 to (i) everolimus initiation with tacrolimus elimination (TAC Elimination) (ii) everolimus initiation with reduced‐exposure tacrolimus (EVR+Reduced TAC) or (iii) standard‐exposure tacrolimus (TAC Control). Randomization to TAC Elimination was terminated prematurely due to a higher rate of treated biopsy‐proven acute rejection (tBPAR). EVR+Reduced TAC was noninferior to TAC Control for the primary efficacy endpoint (tBPAR, graft loss or death at 12 months posttransplantation): 6.7% versus 9.7% (?3.0%; 95% CI ?8.7, 2.6%; p<0.001 for noninferiority [12% margin]). tBPAR occurred in 2.9% of EVR+Reduced TAC patients versus 7.0% of TAC Controls (p = 0.035). The change in adjusted estimated GFR from randomization to month 12 was superior with EVR+Reduced TAC versus TAC Control (difference 8.50 mL/min/1.73 m², 97.5% CI 3.74, 13.27 mL/min/1.73 m², p<0.001 for superiority). Drug discontinuation for adverse events occurred in 25.7% of EVR+Reduced TAC and 14.1% of TAC Controls (relative risk 1.82, 95% CI 1.25, 2.66). Relative risk of serious infections between the EVR+Reduced TAC group versus TAC Controls was 1.76 (95% CI 1.03, 3.00). Everolimus facilitates early tacrolimus minimization with comparable efficacy and superior renal function, compared to a standard tacrolimus exposure regimen 12 months after liver transplantation.     

Do patient characteristics influence efficacy and renal outcomes in liver transplant patients receiving everolimus?

Data from the 24‐month randomized, multicenter, open‐label H2304 study in 719 de novo liver transplant recipients were analyzed to evaluate the influence of variables potentially affecting immunological or renal response: recipient age, gender, end‐stage disease, hepatitis C virus (HCV) status, and Model for End‐stage Liver Disease score and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at randomization (day 30). Treated BPAR was similar between everolimus with reduced tacrolimus (EVR + Reduced TAC) vs. conventional tacrolimus‐based therapy (TAC Control) in all subpopulations, with a trend to lower risk under everolimus with reduced tacrolimus (EVR + Reduced TAC) in patients <60 yrs and HCV‐negative recipients. Risk of graft loss or death was similar in both treatment groups for all subpopulations. The change in eGFR to month 24 showed a benefit for EVR + Reduced TAC vs. TAC Control in all subpopulations other than those with the lowest baseline eGFR (30 to <55 mL/min/1.73m²), with a significant difference in favor of EVR + Reduced TAC for younger recipients (<60 yr), female patients, HCV‐negative patients and those with baseline eGFR of 55 to <70 mL/min/1.73 m². Everolimus with reduced tacrolimus maintains efficacy to at least two yr after liver transplantation even in patients with risk factors for rejection, with particular renal benefits in specific patient subpopulations.     

Early conversion of pediatric kidney transplant patients to everolimus with reduced tacrolimus and steroid elimination: Results of a randomized trial

In a 12‐month, multicenter, open‐label study, 106 children were randomized at 4 to 6 weeks after kidney transplantation to switch to everolimus with reduced TAC (EVR/rTAC) and steroid elimination from month 5 posttransplant or to continue standard tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil (sTAC/MMF) and steroids. The cumulative incidence of a co‐primary efficacy end point (biopsy‐proven acute rejection [BPAR], graft loss, or death from randomization to month 12) was 10.3% with EVR/rTAC and 5.8% with sTAC/MMF (difference 4.4%; P = .417). BPAR occurred in 9.6% and 5.6% of patients, respectively. Patient and renal allograft survival were 100%. The co‐primary end point of mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at month 12 was 76.2 mL/min/1.73 m² with EVR/rTAC and 72.5 mL/min/1.73 m² for sTAC/MMF (difference 3.8 mL/min/1.73m²; P = .49). One EVR/rTAC patient developed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease. Longitudinal growth and sexual maturation were equivalent between groups. The randomized drug regimen was discontinued in 34.6% and 13% of patients in the EVR/rTAC and sTAC/MMF groups, respectively (P = .024), and discontinued due to adverse events/infections in 25.0% and 11.1% of patients (P = .062). In conclusion, early conversion of pediatric kidney transplant patients from TAC, MMF, and steroids to EVR/rTAC and steroid withdrawal maintains immunosuppressive efficacy and preserves renal function.     

Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus Plus Low‐Dose Tacrolimus Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil Plus Standard‐Dose Tacrolimus in De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients: 12‐Month Data

In this 12‐month, multicenter, randomized, open‐label, noninferiority study, de novo renal transplant recipients (RTxRs) were randomized (1:1) to receive everolimus plus low‐dose tacrolimus (EVR+LTac) or mycophenolate mofetil plus standard‐dose Tac (MMF+STac) with induction therapy (basiliximab or rabbit anti‐thymocyte globulin). Noninferiority of composite efficacy failure rate (treated biopsy‐proven acute rejection [tBPAR]/graft loss/death/loss to follow‐up) in EVR+LTac versus MMF+STac was missed by 1.4%, considering the noninferiority margin of 10% (24.6% vs. 20.4%; 4.2% [?3.0, 11.4]). Incidence of tBPAR (19.1% vs. 11.2%; p < 0.05) was significantly higher, while graft loss (1.3% vs. 3.9%; p < 0.05) and composite of graft loss/death/lost to follow‐up (6.1% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.05) were significantly lower in EVR+LTac versus MMF+STac groups, respectively. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was similar between EVR+LTac and MMF+STac groups (63.1 [22.0] vs. 63.1 [19.5] mL/min/1.73 m²) and safety was comparable. In conclusion, EVR+LTac missed noninferiority versus MMF+STac based on the 10% noninferiority margin. Further studies evaluating optimal immunosuppression for improved efficacy will guide appropriate dosing and target levels of EVR and LTac in RTxRs.     

Efficacy and safety of everolimus with reduced tacrolimus in living‐donor liver transplant recipients: 12‐month results of a randomized multicenter study

In a multicenter, open‐label, study, 284 living‐donor liver transplant patients were randomized at 30 ± 5 days posttransplant to start everolimus+reduced tacrolimus (EVR+rTAC) or continue standard tacrolimus (TAC Control). EVR+rTAC was non‐inferior to TAC Control for the primary efficacy endpoint of treated BPAR, graft loss or death at 12 months posttransplant: difference –0.7% (90% CI ?5.2%, 3.7%); P < .001 for non‐inferiority. Treated BPAR occurred in 2.2% and 3.6% of patients, respectively. The key secondary endpoint, change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from randomization to month 12, achieved non‐inferiority (P < .001 for non‐inferiority), but not superiority and was similar between groups overall (mean ?8.0 vs. ?12.1 mL/min/1.73 m², P = .108), and in patients continuing randomized treatment (?8.0 vs. ?13.3 mL/min/1.73 m², P = .046). In the EVR+rTAC and TAC control groups, study drug was discontinued in 15.5% and 17.6% of patients, adverse events with suspected relation to study drug occurred in 57.0% and 40.4%, and proteinuria ≥1 g/24 h in 9.3% and 0%, respectively. Everolimus did not negatively affect liver regeneration. At 12 months, hepatocellular recurrence was only seen in the standard TAC‐treated patients (5/62; 8.1%). In conclusion, early introduction of EVR+rTAC was non‐inferior to standard tacrolimus in terms of efficacy and renal function at 12 months, with hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence only in TAC Control patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01888432.     

Controlled randomized study comparing the cardiovascular profile of everolimus with tacrolimus in renal transplantation

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) regression after kidney transplantation may be influenced by immunosuppression. In a 24‐month open‐label, multicenter, phase‐IV study, 71 kidney allograft recipients without previous acute rejection, showing eGFR >40 ml/min and proteinuria <500 mg/day and between 6 months and 3 years post‐transplantation, were randomized to receive everolimus (EVR) + mycophenolic acid (MPA) or were maintained on tacrolimus (TAC) + MPA. The aim was to assess whether the conversion to EVR could reduce left ventricular mass index (LVMi) at month‐24. LVMi at month‐24 decreased without differences between groups (TAC: 54.0 vs. 48.2 g/m^2.7; EVR: 53.4 vs. 49.4 g/m^2.7). The LVH prevalence at baseline and month‐24 was 59.4% and 40.6% in TAC group and 57.1% and 50.0% in EVR group. EVR conversion was associated with nearly disappearance of concentric LVH and concentric remodeling pattern. The procollagen type I N‐terminal propeptide at month‐24 showed greater reduction in EVR group (51.6 vs. 58.2 mg/l; P = 0.004). Conversion from TAC to EVR was associated with a significant improvement of eGFR (P = 0.0315, ancova ). Adverse events were similar between groups without rejection episode or graft loss. Conversion from TAC to EVR did not further reduce LVMi after 24 months, although its effect on concentric LVH deserves further investigation (NCT01169701).     

Comparing everolimus‐based immunosuppression with reduction or withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitor reduction from 6 months after heart transplantation: The randomized MANDELA study

In the 12‐month, open‐label MANDELA study, patients were randomized at month 6 after heart transplantation to (1) convert to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)‐free immunosuppression with everolimus (EVR), mycophenolic acid and steroids (CNI‐free, n = 71), or to (2) continue reduced‐exposure CNI, with EVR and steroids (EVR/redCNI, n = 74). Tacrolimus was administered in 48.8% of EVR/redCNI patients and 52.6% of CNI‐free patients at randomization. Both strategies improved and stabilized renal function based on the primary endpoint (estimated GFR at month 18 posttransplant postrandomization) with superiority of the CNI‐free group vs EVR/redCNI: mean 64.1 mL/min/1.73 m² vs 52.9 mL/min/1.73 m²; difference + 11.3 mL/min/1.73 m² (P < .001). By month 18, estimated GFR had increased by ≥ 10 mL/min/1.73 m² in 31.8% and 55.2% of EVR/redCNI and CNI‐free patients, respectively, and by ≥ 25 mL/min/1.73 m² in 4.5% and 20.9%. Rates of biopsy‐proven acute rejection (BPAR) were 6.8% and 21.1%; all cases were without hemodynamic compromise. BPAR was less frequent with EVR/redCNI vs the CNI‐free regimen (P = .015); 6 of 15 episodes in CNI‐free patients occurred with EVR concentration < 5 ng/mL. Rates of adverse events and associated discontinuations were comparable. EVR/redCNI from month 6 achieved stable renal function with infrequent BPAR. One‐year renal function can be improved by early conversion to EVR‐based CNI‐free therapy but requires close EVR monitoring. Clinical trials registry: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00862979.     

Conversion From Cyclosporine to Everolimus at 4.5 Months Posttransplant: 3‐Year Results From the Randomized ZEUS Study

The long‐term effect of conversion from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy to an mTOR inhibitor requires clarification. Following completion of the 12‐month, open‐label, multicenter ZEUS study, in which 300 kidney transplant recipients were randomized to continue cyclosporine (CsA) or convert to everolimus at 4.5 months posttransplant, outcomes were assessed at month 36 (n = 284; 94.7%). CNI therapy was reintroduced in 28.4% of everolimus patients by month 36. The primary efficacy endpoint, estimated glomerular filtration rate (Nankivell, ANCOVA) was significantly higher with everolimus versus the CsA group at month 24 (7.6 mL/min/1.73 m², 95%CI 4.3, 11.0 mL/min/1.73 m²; p < 0.001) and month 36 (7.5 mL/min/1.73 m², 95%CI 3.6, 11.4 mL/min/1.73 m²; p < 0.001). The incidence of biopsy‐proven acute rejection from randomization to month 36 was 13.0% in the everolimus arm and 4.8% in the CsA arm (p = 0.015). Patient and graft survival, as well as incidences of malignancy, severe infections and hospitalization, were similar between groups. Kidney transplant patients who are converted from CsA to everolimus at month 4.5 and who remain on everolimus thereafter may achieve a significant improvement in renal function that is maintained to 3 years. There was a significantly higher rate of rejection in the everolimus arm but this did not exert a deleterious effect by 3 years posttransplant.     

Renal Function Changes Under Everolimus Plus Cyclosporine or Everolimus Plus Tacrolimus After Heart Transplantation

Everolimus (EVR) can be used with calcineurin inhibitors to reduce the risk of renal dysfunction, with similar immunosuppressive effect. In this study, we compared renal function after heart transplantation (HT) under EVR with cyclosporine (CSA) or tacrolimus (TAC). Between 2004 and 2014, EVR with CSA or TAC was used in 117 HT at the National Taiwan University Hospital. After HT, all patients received corticosteroid, EVR (C0 target 3–8 ng/mL) and CSA (C0 blood level 100–200 ng/mL), or TAC (Co blood level 5–10 ng/mL). Renal function was evaluated before HT, every month after HT for up to 1 year, and then every 3 months for up to 2 years. Blood-drug levels of EVR, CSA, and TAC were also monitored simultaneously with renal function. The estimated mean glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 76.5 mL/min/1.73 m² before HT. After HT, the eGFR was 64 mL/min/1.73 m² at the third month, and 64 mL/min/1.73 m² at the end of first year. The difference was significant between pre-HT and post-HT (P?=?.00) during the first year. No significant differences were noted between the CSA and TAC groups. Careful monitoring of blood-drug level and renal function is crucial after heart transplantation. It is concluded that under close monitoring blood-drug level and renal function, it is possible to reach acceptable postoperative renal function with no difference of renal function between EVR plus CSA and EVR plus TAC.     

Early Conversion From Calcineurin Inhibitor‐ to Everolimus‐Based Therapy Following Kidney Transplantation: Results of the Randomized ELEVATE Trial

In a 24‐month, multicenter, open‐label, randomized trial, 715 de novo kidney transplant recipients were randomized at 10–14 weeks to convert to everolimus (n = 359) or remain on standard calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy (n = 356; 231 tacrolimus; 125 cyclosporine), all with mycophenolic acid and steroids. The primary endpoint, change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from randomization to month 12, was similar for everolimus versus CNI: mean (standard error) 0.3(1.5) mL/min/1.73² versus ?1.5(1.5) mL/min/1.73² (p = 0.116). Biopsy‐proven acute rejection (BPAR) at month 12 was more frequent under everolimus versus CNI overall (9.7% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.014) and versus tacrolimus‐treated patients (2.6%, p < 0.001) but similar to cyclosporine‐treated patients (8.8%, p = 0.755). Reporting on de novo donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) was limited but suggested more frequent anti‐HLA Class I DSA under everolimus. Change in left ventricular mass index was similar. Discontinuation due to adverse events was more frequent with everolimus (23.6%) versus CNI (8.4%). In conclusion, conversion to everolimus at 10–14 weeks posttransplant was associated with renal function similar to that with standard therapy overall. Rates of BPAR were low in all groups, but lower with tacrolimus than everolimus.     

Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus and Mycophenolic Acid With Early Tacrolimus Withdrawal After Liver Transplantation: A Multicenter Randomized Trial

SIMCER was a 6‐mo, multicenter, open‐label trial. Selected de novo liver transplant recipients were randomized (week 4) to everolimus with low‐exposure tacrolimus discontinued by month 4 (n = 93) or to tacrolimus‐based therapy (n = 95), both with basiliximab induction and enteric‐coated mycophenolate sodium with or without steroids. The primary end point, change in estimated GFR (eGFR; MDRD formula) from randomization to week 24 after transplant, was superior with everolimus (mean eGFR change +1.1 vs. ?13.3 mL/min per 1.73 m² for everolimus vs. tacrolimus, respectively; difference 14.3 [95% confidence interval 7.3–21.3]; p < 0.001). Mean eGFR at week 24 was 95.8 versus 76.0 mL/min per 1.73 m² for everolimus versus tacrolimus (p < 0.001). Treatment failure (treated biopsy‐proven acute rejection [BPAR; rejection activity index score >3], graft loss, or death) from randomization to week 24 was similar (everolimus 10.0%, tacrolimus 4.3%; p = 0.134). BPAR was more frequent between randomization and month 6 with everolimus (10.0% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.026); the rate of treated BPAR was 8.9% versus 2.2% (p = 0.055). Sixteen everolimus‐treated patients (17.8%) and three tacrolimus‐treated patients (3.2%) discontinued the study drug because of adverse events. In conclusion, early introduction of everolimus at an adequate exposure level with gradual calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal after liver transplantation, supported by induction therapy and mycophenolic acid, is associated with a significant renal benefit versus CNI‐based immunosuppression but more frequent BPAR.     

Pilot conversion trial from mycophenolic acid to everolimus in ABO‐incompatible kidney‐transplant recipients with BK viruria and/or viremia

Immunosuppression using everolimus (EVR) plus low‐dose tacrolimus (Tac) is commonly used in organ transplantation. EVR has potential antiviral effects. Herein, the long‐term outcomes and impacts of Tac‐EVR on the BK virus are reported in ABO‐incompatible kidney‐transplant recipients. The initial immunosuppressive regimen combined steroids, Tac, and mycophenolic acid (MPA). At a median of 141 (34–529) days post‐transplantation, seven stable ABO‐incompatible kidney‐transplant recipients were converted from MPA to EVR because of active BK replication, and compared with a reference group of fourteen ABO‐incompatible patients receiving classical Tac plus MPA. At 1 month before conversion, at 1, 3 months after, and at last follow‐up, clinical and biological parameters were monitored. The median time from conversion to the last follow‐up was 784 (398‐866) days. Conversion to EVR caused no change to rejection episodes or immunological status (isoagglutinin titers, anti‐HLA antibodies). At last follow‐up, median eGFR was similar in the Tac‐MPA versus Tac‐EVR group (40 [range: 14–56] vs. 54.5 ml/min/1.73 m² [range: 0–128], P = 0.07). The major adverse event was dyslipidemia. Interestingly, conversion from MPA to EVR decreased BK viral load in five patients. ABO‐incompatible kidney‐transplant recipients with an active BK virus infection may benefit from conversion to EVR.     

Association of Clinical Events With Everolimus Exposure in Kidney Transplant Patients Receiving Low Doses of Tacrolimus

A key objective in the use of immunosuppression after kidney transplantation is to attain the optimal balance between efficacy and safety. In a phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, open‐label, noninferiority study, the incidences of clinical events, renal dysfunction, and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed at 12 months in 309 de novo renal transplant recipients receiving everolimus (EVR), low‐dose tacrolimus (LTac), and prednisone. Cox proportional hazard regression modeling was used to estimate the probability of clinical events at specified combinations of time‐normalized EVR and Tac trough concentrations. At 12 months, the highest incidence of treated biopsy‐proven acute rejection (tBPAR) and graft loss occurred most often in patients with EVR trough concentration <3 ng/mL (64.7% and 10.5%, respectively). At 1 month and 12 months, increasing EVR levels were associated with fewer tBPAR events (both p < 0.0001). Low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and decreased eGFR occurred more often in patients with lower EVR and higher Tac levels. AEs were most often observed in patients with EVR levels <3 ng/mL. This study supports maintaining an EVR trough concentration of 3–8 ng/mL, when combined with LTac, to achieve balanced efficacy and safety in renal transplant recipients. Trial registration: NCT01025817.     

Three-year outcomes from the CRADLE study in de novo pediatric kidney transplant recipients receiving everolimus with reduced tacrolimus and early steroid withdrawal

CRADLE was a 36-month multicenter study in pediatric (≥1 to <18 years) kidney transplant recipients randomized at 4 to 6 weeks posttransplant to receive everolimus + reduced-exposure tacrolimus (EVR + rTAC; n = 52) with corticosteroid withdrawal at 6-month posttransplant or continue mycophenolate mofetil + standard-exposure TAC (MMF + sTAC; n = 54) with corticosteroids. The incidence of composite efficacy failure (biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], graft loss, or death) at month 36 was 9.8% vs 9.6% (difference: 0.2%; 80% confidence interval: −7.3 to 7.7) for EVR + rTAC and MMF + sTAC, respectively, which was driven by BPARs. Graft loss was low (2.1% vs 3.8%) with no deaths. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at month 36 was comparable between groups (68.1 vs 67.3 mL/min/1.73 m²). Mean changes (z-score) in height (0.72 vs 0.39; P = .158) and weight (0.61 vs 0.82; P = .453) from randomization to month 36 were comparable, whereas growth in prepubertal patients on EVR + rTAC was better (P = .050) vs MMF + sTAC. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs was comparable between groups. Rejection was the leading AE for study drug discontinuation in the EVR + rTAC group. In conclusion, though AE-related study drug discontinuation was higher, an EVR + rTAC regimen represents an alternative treatment option that enables withdrawal of steroids as well as reduction of CNIs for pediatric kidney transplant recipients. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01544491.     

Ab initio Everolimus-based Versus Standard Calcineurin Inhibitor Immunosuppression Regimen in Liver Transplant Recipients

Aim

We designed a retrospective case-control study to determine the efficacy and feasibility of everolimus (EVR) combined with low-dose tacrolimus (Tac) ab initio versus standard-dose Tac after liver transplantation (LT).

Efficacy and safety of conversion from cyclosporine to everolimus in living‐donor kidney transplant recipients: an analysis from the ZEUS study

Conversion of living‐donor kidney transplant patients from calcineurin inhibitor therapy to an mTOR inhibitor is poorly documented. In the prospective, multicentre ZEUS study, 300 kidney transplant recipients without prior rejection (Banff grade >1) and serum creatinine ≤265 μmol/l were randomized to continue cyclosporine or convert to everolimus at 4.5 months post‐transplant. In a post hoc analysis of 80 living‐donor recipients, adjusted estimated GFR (Nankivell) at month 12 (the primary endpoint) was 74.3 (95% CI [70.7, 77.9]) ml/min/1.73 m² with everolimus versus 63.8 (95% CI [60.0, 67.7]) ml/min/1.73 m²) with cyclosporine, a difference of 10.5 ml/min/1.73 m² in favour of everolimus (P < 0.001). From randomization to month 12, adjusted estimated GFR increased by a mean of 9.8 (95% CI [6.2, 13.4]) ml/min/1.73 m² with everolimus versus ?0.7 (95% CI [?4.6, 3.1]) ml/min/1.73 m²) (P < 0.001) with cyclosporine. There were six biopsy‐proven acute rejection episodes in everolimus‐treated patients (five Banff grade I) and one episode in cyclosporine‐treated patients (Banff grade 1). Overall safety profile was similar between groups. Discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in three everolimus patients (7.1%) and five cyclosporine patients (13.2%) between randomization and month 12. Initiation of everolimus with early elimination of calcineurin therapy is associated with a significant renal benefit at 12 months post‐transplant that is observed in both living and deceased‐donor recipients. (clinicaltrials.gov NCT00154310)     

Impact of early conversion from cyclosporin to everolimus on left ventricular mass index: A randomized controlled trial

This is an 18‐month prospective, randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to compare the effect of early conversion from cyclosporin to everolimus/mycophenolic acid (E‐MPA) between 3 and 4 months post‐transplant to cyclosporin/mycophenolic acid (CsA‐MPA) on left ventricular mass index (LVMI) at 3 and 18 months post‐transplant (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes included estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), viral infection, and adverse events. Twenty‐four patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to E‐MPA or CsA‐MPA groups. There were no significant differences in mean (SD) LVMI at 3 (51.6±18.5 vs 53.7±15.7 g/m^2.7) and 18 months (52.7±16.3 vs 51.7±16.8 g/m^2.7) between CsA‐MPA and E‐MPA groups. The incidence of viral infections was reduced in E‐MPA compared to CsA‐MPA treatment groups (8% vs 50%, P=.02), but the incidences of acute rejection, adverse events, and drug discontinuation were similar between groups. There was an overall increase in eGFR with time (0.04 log‐ mL/min/1.73 m² per 6 months, P=.012) but no significant difference between the two groups across time (0.11 log‐ mL/min/1.73 m², P=.311). Immunosuppressive regimen comprising early conversion from cyclosporine to everolimus was not associated with a regression of LVMI, but a lower risk of viral infections was observed.     

Protein Kinase C Inhibitor Sotrastaurin in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Phase II Trial

Efficacy and safety of protein kinase C inhibitor sotrastaurin (STN) with tacrolimus (TAC) was assessed in a 24‐month, multicenter, phase II study in de novo liver transplant recipients. A total of 204 patients were randomized (1:1:1:1) to STN 200 mg b.i.d. + standard‐exposure TAC (n = 50) or reduced‐exposure TAC (n = 52), STN 300 mg b.i.d. + reduced‐exposure TAC (n = 50), or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 1 g b.i.d. + standard‐exposure TAC (control, n = 52); all with steroids. Owing to premature study termination, treatment comparisons were only conducted for Month 6. At Month 6, composite efficacy failure rates (treated biopsy‐proven acute rejection episodes of Banff grade ≥1, graft loss, or death) were 25.0%, 16.5%, 20.9% and 15.9% for STN 200 mg + standard TAC, STN 200 mg + reduced TAC, STN 300 mg + reduced TAC and control groups, respectively. Median estimated glomerular filtration rates were 84.0, 83.3, 81.1 and 75.3 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively. Gastrointestinal events (constipation, diarrhea, and nausea), infection, and tachycardia were more frequent in STN groups. More patients in STN groups experienced serious adverse events compared with the control group (62.3–70.8% vs. 51.9%). STN‐based regimens were associated with a higher efficacy failure rate and higher incidence of adverse events with no significant difference in renal function between the groups.     

Chronic renal outcome after living donor liver transplantation

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the common complications after deceased donor liver transplantation. Although the worldwide pressing shortage in deceased donors has directed attention to living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), LDLT cohort data focusing on chronic renal dysfunction is limited. A total of 280 adult LDLT recipients (median 49 yr, 156 men) at the University of Tokyo hospital between 1996 and 2006 were reviewed. A total of 224 pre‐transplant liver failure patients (80.0%) showed an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of more than 60 mL/min/1.73 m². However, during follow‐up at a mean of 1222 d after transplantation, eGFR declined to 60 mL/min/1.73 m² and 30 mL/min/1.73 m² in 150 (53.2%) and 21 (7.5%), respectively, and four patients (1.4%) required maintenance renal replacement therapy. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model regression analysis revealed that recipient age (HR, 3.42 per 10‐yr increment; p < 0.001) and pre‐transplant eGFR (HR, 0.85 per 10‐mL/min/1.73 m² increment; p = 0.04) were associated independently with a post‐transplant decrease in eGFR to less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m². We conclude that higher age and lower pre‐transplant eGFR of an LDLT recipient indicate a high likelihood of subsequent development of advanced CKD. Preventive or therapeutic intervention should be optimized for these high‐risk patients.     

Efficacy and safety of de novo or early everolimus with low cyclosporine in deceased‐donor kidney transplant recipients at specified risk of delayed graft function: 12‐month results of a randomized,multicenter trial

Immediate or early use of proliferation signal inhibitor (PSI)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor therapy can avoid high exposure to calcineurin inhibitors but concerns exist relating to the risk of delayed graft function (DGF) and impaired wound healing with the mTOR sirolimus. CALLISTO was a 12‐month, prospective, multicenter, open‐label study. Deceased‐donor kidney transplant patients at protocol‐specified risk of DGF were randomized to start everolimus on day 1 (immediate everolimus, IE; n = 65) or week 5 (delayed everolimus, DE; n = 74). Incidence of the primary endpoint (biopsy‐proven acute rejection, BPAR; graft loss, death, DGF, wound healing complications related to transplant surgery or loss to follow‐up) was 64.6% and 66.2% in the IE and DE groups, respectively, at month 12 (P = 0.860). The overall incidence of BPAR was 20.1%. Median estimated glomerular filtration rate was 48 ml/min/1.73 m² and 49 ml/min/1.73 m² in the IE and DE groups, respectively, at month 12. DGF and wound healing complications were similar between groups. Adverse events led to study drug discontinuation in 17 IE patients (26.2%) and 28 DE patients (37.8%) (NS). In conclusion, introduction of everolimus immediately or early posttransplant in DGF‐risk patients is associated with good efficacy, renal function and safety profile. There seems no benefit in delaying initiation of everolimus.