Incidental Focal 18F-FDG Uptake in the Prostate: Clinical Significance and Differential Diagnostic Criteria

Purpose

The extent and intensity of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in prostate cancer patients are known to be variable, and the clinical significance of focal ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) uptake that is incidentally found on positron emission tomography (PET) has not been established. We investigated the clinical significance of incidental focal prostate uptake of ¹⁸F-FDG on PET/computed tomography (CT) and analyzed differential findings on PET/CT between malignant and benign uptake.

Methods

A total of 14,854 whole-body ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans (4,806 that were conducted during cancer screening and 10,048 that were conducted to evaluate suspected or alleged cancer outside of the prostate) were retrospectively reviewed to determine the presence, location, multiplicity and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of focal prostate uptake and combined calcification. The final diagnosis determined by serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and biopsy was compared with PET findings.

Results

Incidental focal prostate uptake was observed in 148 of 14,854 scans (1.0 %). Sixty-seven of these 148 subjects who had diagnostic confirmation were selected for further analysis. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in nine of 67 subjects (13.4%). The remaining 58 subjects had no malignancy in the prostate based on normal serum PSA level (n = 53), or elevated serum PSA level with a negative biopsy result (n = 5). While 84.6% (11/13) of malignant uptake was peripherally located in the prostate glands, 60.2% (50/83) of benign uptake was centrally located (p < 0.05). The positive predictive value of peripheral focal uptake for malignancy was 25%. The SUVmax, multiplicity and combined calcification were not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusion

Although incidental focal ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the prostate is not common, the incidence of cancer with focal uptake is not low. Therefore, these findings deserve further evaluation. The location of the focal prostate uptake may help with the selection of high-risk prostate cancer patients.     

<Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG and <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FET uptake in experimental soft tissue infection

The aim of this study was to compare the uptake of (18)F-fluoroethyl- L-tyrosine ((18)F-FET) with that of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) in activated inflammatory white blood cells. Unilateral thigh muscle abscesses were induced in 11 rats by intramuscular inoculation of 0.1 ml of a bacterial suspension ( S. aureus, 1.2 x 10(9) CFU/ml). Four animals were intraperitoneally injected with 130-180 MBq (18)F-FDG, four with 140-170 MBq (18)F-FET and three with a mixture of 140-170 MBq (18)F-FET and 1.8 MBq (14)C-deoxyglucose. Autoradiography (10 microm slice thickness) of the abscess and the contralateral muscle was performed and detailed spatial correlation of autoradiography and histopathology (haematoxylin-eosin staining) was obtained. Regions of interest were placed on the abscess wall and the grey values (digitised image intensities) measured were converted to kBq/cc per kBq injected activity per gram (SUV). Areas with increased (18)F-FDG uptake corresponded to cellular inflammatory infiltrates mainly consisting of granulocytes. The SUV was calculated to be 4.08+/-0.65 (mean+/-SD). The uptake of (18)F-FET in activated white blood cells was not increased: the SUV of the abscess wall, at 0.74+/-0.14, was even below that of contralateral muscle. The low uptake of (18)F-FET in non-neoplastic inflammatory cells promises a higher specificity for the detection of tumour cells than is achieved with (18)F-FDG, since the immunological host response will not be labelled and inflammation can be excluded.     

Detection of gastric cancer using <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FLT PET: comparison with <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG PET

Purpose  We prospectively investigated the feasibility of 3′-deoxy-3′-¹⁸F-fluorothymidine (FLT) positron emission tomography (PET) for the detection of gastric cancer, in comparison with 2-deoxy-2-¹⁸F-fluoro-d-glucose (FDG) PET, and determined the degree of correlation between the two radiotracers and proliferative activity as indicated by Ki-67 index. Methods  A total of 21 patients with newly diagnosed advanced gastric cancer were examined with FLT PET and FDG PET. Tumour lesions were identified as areas of focally increased uptake, exceeding that of surrounding normal tissue. For semiquantitative analysis, the maximal standardized uptake value (SUV) was calculated. Results  For detection of advanced gastric cancer, the sensitivities of FLT PET and FDG PET were 95.2% and 95.0%, respectively. The mean (±SD) SUV for FLT (7.0 ± 3.3) was significantly lower than that for FDG (9.4 ± 6.3 p < 0.05). The mean FLT SUV and FDG SUV in nonintestinal tumours were higher than in intestinal tumours, although the difference was not statistically significant. The mean (±SD) FLT SUV in poorly differentiated tumours (8.5 ± 3.5) was significantly higher than that in well and moderately differentiated tumours (5.3 ± 2.1; p < 0.04). The mean FDG SUV in poorly differentiated tumours was higher than in well and moderately differentiated tumours, although the difference was not statistically significant. There was no significant correlation between Ki-67 index and either FLT SUV or FDG SUV. Conclusion  FLT PET showed as high a sensitivity as FDG PET for the detection of gastric cancer, although uptake of FLT in gastric cancer was significantly lower than that of FDG.     

Prospective comparison of combined <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG and <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-NaF PET/CT vs. <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG PET/CT imaging for detection of malignancy

Purpose  

Typically, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT scans are done as two separate studies on different days to allow sufficient time for the radiopharmaceutical from the first study to decay. This is inconvenient for the patients and exposes them to two doses of radiation from the CT component of the examinations. In the current study, we compared the clinical usefulness of a combined ¹⁸F-FDG/¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT scan with that of a separate ¹⁸F-FDG-only PET/CT scan.     

Usefulness of <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG PET in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Surgical resection is the only curative treatment strategy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CC). Therefore, accurate staging is essential for appropriate management of patients with CC. We assessed the usefulness of 2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in the staging of CC. We undertook a retrospective review of FDG PET images in 21 patients (10 female, 11 male; mean age 57 years) diagnosed with CC. Ten patients had hilar CC and 11, peripheral CC. Patients underwent abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (n=20) and computed tomography (CT) (n=12) for the evaluation of primary tumours, and chest radiography and whole-body bone scintigraphy for work-up of distant metastases. For semi-quantitative analysis, the maximum voxel standardised uptake value (SUV_max) was obtained from the primary tumour. All peripheral CCs showed intensely increased FDG uptake, and some demonstrated ring-shaped uptake corresponding to peripheral rim enhancement on CT and/or MRI. In nine of the ten patients, hilar CCs demonstrated increased FDG uptake of a focal nodular or linear branching appearance. The remaining case was false negative on FDG PET. One patient with a false negative result on MRI demonstrated increased uptake on FDG PET. Among the ten hilar CCs, FDG uptake was intense in only two patients and was slightly higher than that of the hepatic parenchyma in the remaining patients. For the detection of lymph node metastasis, FDG PET and CT/MRI were concordant in 16 patients, and discordant in five (FDG PET was positive in three, and CT and MRI in two). FDG PET identified unsuspected distant metastases in four of the 21 patients; all of these patients had peripheral CC. FDG PET is useful in detecting the primary lesion in both hilar and peripheral CC and is of value in discovering unsuspected distant metastases in patients with peripheral CC. FDG PET could be useful in cases of suspected hilar CC with non-confirmatory biopsy and radiological findings.     

<Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG and <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FLT PET/CT imaging in the characterization of mediastinal lymph nodes

Purpose

There is currently no single modality for accurate characterization of enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes into benign or malignant. Recently ¹⁸F-fluorothymidine (FLT) has been used as a proliferation marker. In this prospective study, we examined the role of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and ¹⁸F-FLT PET/CT in categorizing mediastinal lymph nodes as benign or malignant.

Materials and methods

A total of 70 consecutive patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy detected on computed tomography (CT) or chest radiograph underwent whole body ¹⁸F-FLT PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT (within 1 week of each other). Lymph nodal tracer uptake was determined by calculation of standardized uptake value (SUV) with both the tracers. Results of PET/CT were compared with histopathology of the lymph nodes.

Results

Histopathology results showed thirty-seven patients with sarcoidosis, seven patients with tuberculosis, nine patients with non-small cell lung cancer, five patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma and twelve patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The mean FDG SUV_max of sarcoidosis, tuberculosis, Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma was 12.7, 13.4, 8.2, and 8.8, respectively, and the mean FLT SUV_max was 6.0, 5.4, 4.4, and 3.8, respectively. It was not possible to characterize mediastinal lymphadenopathy as benign or malignant solely based on FDG SUV_max values (p > 0.05) or FLT SUV_max values (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in FDG uptake (p > 0.9) or FLT uptake (p > 0.9) between sarcoidosis and tuberculosis. In lung cancer patients, the FDG SUV_max and FLT SUV_max of those lymph nodes with tumor infiltration on biopsy was 6.7 and 3.9, respectively, and those without nodal infiltration was 6.4 and 3.7, respectively, and both the tracers were not able to characterize the nodal status as malignant or benign (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Though ¹⁸F-FLT PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT reflect different aspects of biology, i.e., proliferation and metabolism, respectively, neither tracer could provide satisfactory categorization of benign and malignant lymph nodes. The results of this study clearly suggest that differentiation of mediastinal nodes into benign and malignant solely based on SUV_max values cannot be relied upon, especially in settings where tuberculosis and sarcoidosis are common.

     

Differential uptake of <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG in patients with synchronous lung cancers

¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) has developed into the standard of care for investigating patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to determine the optimal treatment. However, although the majority of patients with NSCLC do have intense uptake of tracer, false negatives do occur and should be considered. We report cases of patients that have synchronous NSCLCs. In both cases, there was intense uptake of FDG in one tumour type, with very low grade uptake in the separate tumour. Histology confirmed separate lung malignancies, demonstrating that differential FDG uptake may not always be inflammatory and should be considered to have a separate malignant aetiology.     

<Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG PET imaging of progressive massive fibrosis

Purpose  

This study was to evaluate ¹⁸F-FDG PET features of progressive massive fibrosis (PMF) and to determine the ability of FDG PET to differentiate pure PMF from PMF-associated lung cancer.     

<Superscript>123</Superscript>I-MIBG scintigraphy/SPECT versus <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG PET in paediatric neuroblastoma

Purpose  

To analyse different uptake patterns in ¹²³I-MIBG scintigraphy/SPECT imaging and ¹⁸F-FDG PET in paediatric neuroblastoma patients.     

Correlation of <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FLT and <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG uptake on PET with Ki-67 immunohistochemistry in non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose The nucleoside analogue 3′-deoxy-3′-¹⁸F-fluorothymidine (FLT) has recently been introduced for imaging cell proliferation with positron emission tomography (PET). We prospectively evaluated whether FLT uptake reflects proliferative activity as indicated by the Ki-67 index in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), in comparison with 2-deoxy-2-¹⁸F-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG). Methods A total of 18 patients with newly diagnosed NSCLC were examined with both FLT PET and FDG PET. PET imaging was performed at 60 min after each radiotracer injection. Tumour lesions were identified as areas of focally increased uptake, exceeding background uptake in the lungs. For semi-quantitative analysis, the maximum standardised uptake value (SUV) was calculated. Proliferative activity as indicated by the Ki-67 index was estimated in tissue specimens. Immunohistochemical findings were correlated with SUVs. Results The sensitivity of FLT and FDG PET for the detection of lung cancer was 72% and 89%, respectively. Four of the five false-negative FLT PET findings occurred in bronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma. The mean FLT SUV was significantly lower than the mean FDG SUV. A significant correlation was observed between FLT SUV and Ki-67 index (r = 0.77; p < 0.0002) and for FDG SUV (r = 0.81; p < 0.0001). Conclusion The results of this preliminary study suggest that, compared with FDG, FLT may be less sensitive for primary staging in patients with NSCLC. Although FLT uptake correlated significantly with proliferative activity in NSCLC, the correlation was not better than that for FDG uptake.     

<Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG PET independently predicts survival in patients with cholangiocellular carcinoma treated with <Superscript>90</Superscript>Y microspheres

Purpose  

⁹⁰Y radioembolization has emerged as a valuable therapy for intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinomas (ICC). We aimed to evaluate the prognostic power of FDG PET/CT and that of pretherapeutic scintigraphy with ^99mTc-labelled macroagglutinated albumin (MAA), an index of tumour vascularization.     

Inverse Prognostic Relationships of <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG PET/CT Metabolic Parameters in Patients with Distal Bile Duct Cancer Undergoing Curative Surgery

Purpose

As there were few previous studies with a small number of subjects, the purpose of this was to evaluate the prognostic significance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in patients with distal bile duct cancer undergoing curative surgery.

Methods

The study included 40 patients (M/F?=?24:16; age 68.0?±?8.0 years) who underwent preoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT followed by curative surgical resection. The participant’s age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance-status score, baseline serum CA 19-9 level, stage, pathologic T and N stages, tumor size, tumor grade, tumor growth pattern, R0 resection, and adjuvant therapy were included as clinicopathological variables for predicting overall survival. The PET variables were maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max), average SUV (SUV_avg), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of the tumor. The Kaplan-Meyer method and Cox proportional hazards model were used for the survival analysis.

Results

A total of 15 of 40 patients (37.5%) died during the follow-up period. In univariate analysis, low SUV_max (≤?2.7, p?=?0.0005) and low SUV_avg (≤?2.6, p?=?0.0034) were significant predictors of poor overall survival. In multivariate analyses, only low SUV_max (HR?=?6.7016, 95% CI 1.9961–22.4993, p?=?0.0047) was an independent prognostic factor associated with poor overall survival.

Conclusion

The SUV_max of the primary tumor measured by ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was an independent significant prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with distal bile duct cancer. However, different results from a previous study warrant further large sample-sized study.

     

Comparison of <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FLT PET and <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG PET for preoperative staging in non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose The nucleoside analog 3′-deoxy-3′-¹⁸F-fluorothymidine (FLT) has been introduced for imaging cell proliferation with positron emission tomography (PET). We prospectively compared the diagnostic efficacy of FLT PET with that of 2-deoxy-2-¹⁸F-fluoro-d-glucose (FDG) PET for the preoperative nodal and distant metastatic staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods A total of 34 patients with NSCLC underwent FLT PET and FDG PET. PET imaging was performed at 60 min after each radiotracer injection. The PET images were evaluated qualitatively for regions of focally increased metabolism. For visualized primary tumors, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) was calculated. Nodal stages were determined by using the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system and surgical and histologic findings reference standards. Results For the depiction of primary tumor, sensitivity of FLT PET was 67%, compared with 94% for FDG PET (P = 0.005). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for lymph node staging on a per-patient basis were 57, 93, 67, 89, and 85%, respectively, with FLT PET and 57, 78, 36, 91, and 74%, respectively, with FDG PET (P > 0.1 for all comparisons). Two of the three distant metastases were detected with FLT and FDG PET. Conclusion In NSCLC, FLT PET showed better (although not statistically significant) specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy for N staging on a per-patient basis than FDG PET. However, FDG PET was found to have higher sensitivity for depiction of primary tumor than FLT PET.     

Assessing the role of <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG PET and <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of soft tissue musculoskeletal malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Twelve years ago a meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in assessing musculoskeletal soft tissue lesions (MsSTL). Currently, PET/CT has substituted PET imaging; however, there has not been any published meta-analysis on the use of PET/CT or a comparison of PET/CT with PET in the diagnosis of MsSTL. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to identify the current diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and determine if there is added value when compared to PET.

Methods

A systematic review of English articles was conducted, and MEDLINE PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched from 1996 to March 2015. Studies exploring the diagnostic accuracy of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT (or dedicated PET) compared to histopathology in patients with MsSTL undergoing investigation for malignancy were included.

Results

Our meta-analysis included 14 articles composed of 755 patients with 757 soft tissue lesions. There were 451 (60 %) malignant tumors and 306 benign lesions. The ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT (and dedicated PET) mean sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for diagnosing MsSTL were 0.96 (0.90, 1.00), 0.77 (0.67, 0.86), 0.88 (0.85, 0.91), 0.86 (0.78, 0.94), and 0.91 (0.83, 0.99), respectively. The posterior mean (95 % highest posterior density interval) for the AUC was 0.92 (0.88, 0.96). PET/CT had higher specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive value when compared to a dedicated PET (0.85, 0.89, and 0.91 vs 0.71, 0.85, and 0.82, respectively).

Conclusion

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and dedicated PET are both highly accurate in the diagnosis of MsSTL. PET/CT is more accurate and specific and has a higher positive predictive value than PET.

     

<Superscript>99m</Superscript>Tc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC and <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG in thyroid cancer patients with negative <Superscript>131</Superscript>I whole-body scans

Several studies have reported on the expression of somatostatin receptors in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the imaging abilities of a recently developed technetium-99m labelled somatostatin analogue, ^99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC (^99mTc-TOC), in terms of precise localisation of disease. The study population comprised 54 patients (24 men, 30 women; age range 22–90 years) with histologically confirmed DTC who presented with recurrent or persistent disease as indicated by elevated Tg levels after initial treatment. All patients were negative on the iodine-131 post-therapy whole-body scans. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET) was performed in a subgroup of 36 patients. The study population consisted of two groups: Group A (n=22) comprised patients with disease recurrence as shown by elevated Tg levels but without detectable pathology. In group B (n=32), pre-existing lesions were known. Among the 54 cases, SSTR scintigraphy was true positive in 33 (61.1%), true negative in 4 (7.4%) and false negative in 17 (31.5%) cases, which resulted in a sensitivity of 66%. A total of 138 tumour foci were localised in 33 patients. The fraction of true positive ^99mTc-TOC findings was positively correlated (P<0.01) with elevated Tg levels (higher than 30 ng/ml). Despite two false positive findings, analysis on a lesion basis demonstrated better diagnostic efficacy with ¹⁸F-FDG PET (P<0.001); however, it also revealed substantial agreement between the imaging techniques [Cohens kappa of 0.62 (0.47–0.78)]. In conclusion, scintigraphy with ^99mTc-TOC might be a promising tool for treatment planning; it is easy to perform and showed sufficient accuracy for localisation diagnostics in thyroid cancer patients with recurrent or metastatic disease.