Long‐term remission in a case of plasmablastic lymphoma treated with COMP (cyclophosphamide,liposomal doxorubicin,vincristine, prednisone) and bortezomib

Plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) is a rare subtype of non‐Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) strongly associated with HIV infection, even if cases in other immunosuppressed patients such as solid organ transplant recipients and in immunocompetent individuals have been increasingly reported. Current treatment strategy for HIV‐negative patients is similar to DLBCL as first‐line treatment, but durable remissions are seldom observed. Anthracycline‐containing regimens could be too toxic for elderly patients and/or with cardiac failure, because a non‐pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (NLD) could be used in this field. Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor currently approved for patients with multiple myeloma and relapsed mantle‐cell lymphoma, has recently showed clinical activity in PBL patients. Herein, we report a rapid and long‐term remission of a PBL patient with cardiac failure and that had previously received a double kidney transplant, treated front‐line with COMP (with a NLD substituted for doxorubicin) followed by subcutaneous bortezomib consolidation. We suggest first‐line treatment outcome is determinant for PBL patients. Bortezomib has a promising role and should be incorporated in future clinical trials and NLD could represent a suitable option for patients with cardiac failure or high cardiovascular risk.     

Pentostatin,cyclophosphamide and rituximab for previously untreated advanced stage,low‐grade B‐cell lymphomas

We conducted a prospective phase II trial of pentostatin, cyclophosphamide and rituximab as initial therapy for patients with previously untreated advanced stage low‐grade or indolent B‐cell lymphomas (iNHLs). Of 83 evaluable patients, 91·6% attained an overall response and 86·8% a complete or unconfirmed complete response. The 3‐year progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates were 73% and 93%, respectively. The 3‐year PFS rate was significantly different for different diagnoses (P = 0·01): 83% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0·72, 0·96] for follicular lymphomas, 73% (95% CI: 0·54, 1·0) for marginal zone lymphomas and 61% (95% CI: 0·46, 0·81) for small lymphocytic lymphomas. The most common adverse events were haematological. Of 509 cycles of chemotherapy administered, grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was reported in 68 cycles (13% of cycles administered) and most frequently occurred during cycles 4–6. This is the first report demonstrating the effectiveness of pentostatin, cyclophosphamide and rituximab in patients with previously untreated iNHLs, including those over 60 years of age.     

Phase II study of bortezomib in combination with rituximab,cyclophosphamide and prednisone with or without doxorubicin followed by rituximab maintenance in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma

This non‐comparative phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00715208) evaluated bortezomib in place of vincristine in established rituximab‐chemotherapy regimens in relapsed/refractory follicular (FL) or marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). Patients were allocated (physician/patient preference) to receive six 21‐d cycles of: bortezomib 1·6 mg/m² (days 1, 8), rituximab 375 mg/m² (day 1), cyclophosphamide 1000 mg/m² (day 1) and prednisone 100 mg (days 1–5; VR‐CP; 47 FL, 1 MZL patients); or bortezomib, rituximab, prednisone per VR‐CP, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m² and doxorubicin 50 mg/m² (day 1; VR‐CAP; 4 FL, 2 MZL, 1 chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients). With VR‐CP, the response rate was 77%, with a 27% complete response rate. After a median follow‐up of 10·9 months, 40% of patients had relapsed/progressed or died. Median duration of response and progression‐free survival was 21·9 and 14·9 months, respectively. Common drug‐related grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (25%), thrombocytopenia (6%) and lymphopenia (6%). Thirteen (27%) patients reported peripheral neuropathy (one grade 3). With VR‐CAP, one FL patient achieved complete response and three FL and two MZL patients achieved partial responses. Three patients reported drug‐related grade 1/2 peripheral neuropathy. Weekly bortezomib and rituximab represents an active, feasible treatment platform in FL. VR‐CP was active and well tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory FL.     

Efficacy and tolerability of rituximab and reduced-dose cyclophosphamide,doxorubicin, vincristine,and prednisolone therapy for elderly patient with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Objectives: Chemoimmunotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone combined with rituximab (R-CHOP) is currently the first-line therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, management of elderly patients is challenging and often requires dose reductions or prolonged treatment intervals. We investigated the proper dose of R-CHOP for them.

Methods: At our institute, for DLBCL patients aged 65–79 and ≥80 years, we had reduced CHOP dose to 5/6 and 7/12, respectively, and retrospectively evaluated the reduced-dose R-CHOP.

Results: Although the median age in the standard, 5/6, and 7/12-dose groups was 57, 73, and 84 years, respectively (p?<?0.001), the 3-year event-free survival (EFS) rate did not differ between the standard and 5/6-dose groups (60.2 and 56.7%); however, 7/12-dose group had significantly inferior survival (25.9%). When patients aged 60–80 were evaluated, no difference in EFS was observed between the standard and 5/6-dose groups using the same international prognostic index. The neutrophil nadir and the frequency of infection were comparable among the three dose groups.

Discussion and Conclusions: Reduced-dose R-CHOP chemotherapy is a promising treatment for elderly patients with DLBCL in terms of efficacy and toxicity.     

A phase 2 study of lenalidomide,rituximab, cyclophosphamide,and dexamethasone (LR‐CD) for untreated low‐grade non‐Hodgkin lymphoma requiring therapy

Patients with indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) have multiple treatment options yet there is no consensus as to the best initial therapy. Lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory agent, has single agent activity in relapsed lymphoma. This trial was conducted to assess feasibility, efficacy, and safety of adding lenalidomide to rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (LR‐CD) in untreated indolent NHL patients requiring therapy. This was a single institution phase II trial. Treatment consisted of IV rituximab 375 mg/m² day 1; oral lenalidomide 20 mg days 1–21; cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m² days 1, 8, and 15; and dexamethasone 40 mg days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 28‐day cycle. Treatment continued 2 cycles beyond best response for a maximum of 12 cycles without rituximab maintenance. Thirty‐three patients were treated. Median age was 68 (43–83 years). 39% had stage IV disease. Histologic subtypes included 8 follicular lymphoma (FL), 7 marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) (1 splenic, 2 extranodal, and 4 nodal), 15 Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM), 1 lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, 1 small lymphocytic lymphoma, and 1 low‐grade B‐cell lymphoma with plasmacytic differentiation (unable to be classified better as MZL or LPL). Hematologic toxicity was the most common adverse event. Median time of follow‐up was 23.4 months (range 1.8–50.9). The overall response rate was 87.9%, with 30.3% complete response. The median duration of response was 38.7 months. The median progression free survival was 39.7 months, while median overall survival (OS) has not yet been reached. Lenalidomide can be safely added to a simple regimen of rituximab, oral cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone and is an effective combination as initial therapy for low‐grade B‐cell NHL.     

A randomized phase II study of standard‐dose versus high‐dose rituximab with BEAM in autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed aggressive B‐cell non‐hodgkin lymphomas: long term results

High‐dose rituximab (HD‐R) combined with carmustine, cytarabine, etoposide and melphalan (BEAM) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) was effective and tolerable in a single‐arm prospective study of relapsed aggressive B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (R‐NHL). We performed a randomized phase 2 study comparing HD‐R versus standard‐dose rituximab (SD‐R) in R‐NHL. Ninety‐three patients were randomized to HD‐R (1000 mg/m²) (n = 42) or SD‐R (375 mg/m²) (n = 51) administered on post‐transplant days +1 and +8, using a Bayesian adaptive algorithm. The 2 treatment arms were balanced in regards to patient demographic and clinical characteristics. At a median follow‐up of 7·92 years, the 5‐year disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 40% and 48%, respectively. We found no statistically significant differences between HD‐R and SD‐R in 5‐year DFS (36% vs. 43%; P = 0·205) and OS (43% vs. 52%; P = 0·392). In multivariate analyses, only disease status before ASCT [residual disease versus complete remission (CR)] (hazard ratio [HR] 1·79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1·08–2·95) and number of prior treatments received (>2 vs. ≤2 lines of treatment) (HR 1·89, 95% CI: 1·13–3·18) were associated with worse DFS and OS. Patients who had SCT while in CR or who received ≤2 lines of treatment prior to SCT had better 5‐year OS (57% vs. 35%; P = 0·02 and 54% vs. 30%, P = 0·001, respectively) in both arms. No differences in engraftments or adverse events were noted in the 2 arms. When combined with BEAM and ASCT in relapsed aggressive B‐cell NHL, HD‐R provided no DFS or OS advantage over SD‐R. In patients who have been exposed to rituximab in the frontline or salvage setting, the addition of rituximab in the peri‐transplant setting remains controversial.     

Safety and efficacy of cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone and rituximab in patients with human immunodeficiency virus-associated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results of a phase II trial

Immunochemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone and rituximab (R-CHOP) is the standard treatment in non-immunosuppressed patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but its adequacy has not been definitively established in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related lymphoma. This phase II trial aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of six cycles of R-CHOP in patients with HIV-related DLBCL and to determine whether response to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) had prognostic impact. Patients were eligible if they had performance status <3 and absence of active opportunistic infections. Eighty-one patients were enrolled, 57 in stages III or IV, International Prognostic Index (IPI) 0 or 1 ( n  = 26), 2 ( n  = 19), 3 ( n  = 20) and 4 or 5 ( n  = 16), and median CD4 lymphocyte count of 0·158 × 10⁹/l. The main adverse events were neutropenia (48% of cycles) and infections (10% of cycles), which were fatal in seven patients. Complete response was achieved in 55 (69%) patients, with an estimated 3-year disease-free survival of 77% and 3-year overall survival of 56%. IPI score and virological response to HAART were the prognostic parameters for response and survival. In HIV-related DLBCL R-CHOP is feasible, safe and effective. The prognosis depends on lymphoma-related parameters and on the response to HAART.     

Biweekly COP-BLAM (cyclophosphamide,vincristine, prednisone,bleomycin, doxorubicin and procarbazine) regimen combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Abstract: We evaluated the efficacy and adverse effects of biweekly COP-BLAM (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, bleomycin, doxorubicin and procarbazine) therapy combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for treating non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). A complete remission was achieved in 65 (90.3%) of the 72 patients. The median follow-up period was 28 months, and 64 patients were alive at the time of writing. Treatment was delivered as scheduled to 61 patients. G-CSF made it possible to shorten the interval between courses of chemotherapy. One of the 72 patients died of granulocytopenia and pneumonia; no other severe infections were noted. Further studies regarding adverse effects on organs other than the bone marrow are required to improve the long-term results of combination therapy on NHL.     

A phase 2 study of inotuzumab ozogamicin in patients with indolent B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma refractory to rituximab alone,rituximab and chemotherapy,or radioimmunotherapy

This phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) in patients with indolent B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) refractory to rituximab alone, rituximab plus chemotherapy or anti‐CD20 radioimmunotherapy. Patients received InO 1·8 mg/m² intravenously on a 28‐d cycle for a planned 4–8 cycles. The initial InO dose and schedule could be adjusted for tolerability and patients were allowed to receive 2 additional cycles (up to 8 total) after achieving a complete response (CR). The primary endpoint was overall response. Eighty‐one patients were enrolled, among whom 48 (59%) received ≥3 InO cycles and 13 (16%) completed the treatment phase. The overall response rate was 67% (CR, 31%). Median (95% confidence interval) progression‐free survival was 12·7 (8·9–26·9) months; median overall survival was not reached. Haematological adverse events (AEs) were common, particularly thrombocytopenia (74%) and neutropenia (56%). These were also the most common AEs leading to treatment discontinuation (37% and 11%, respectively); 58% of patients reported AEs leading to treatment discontinuation. InO demonstrated robust activity in these heavily pretreated patients, although treatment duration was limited by haematological toxicities. Additional studies may determine dosing regimens that allow for reduced toxicity.     

Long‐term follow‐up of dose‐adjusted EPOCH plus rituximab (DA‐EPOCH‐R) in untreated patients with poor prognosis large B‐cell lymphoma. A phase II study conducted by the Spanish PETHEMA Group

This prospective multi‐institutional phase II study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of dose‐adjusted EPOCH (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin) plus rituximab (DA‐EPOCH‐R) in untreated patients with poor prognosis large B‐cell lymphomas. Eighty‐one patients diagnosed with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL, n = 68), primary mediastinal DLBCL (n = 6) and follicular lymphoma Grade 3b (n = 7), with an age‐adjusted International Prognostic Index >1, were eligible for analysis. Median age was 60 years (range: 21–77). Sixty‐five patients (80·2%) achieved complete response. After a median follow‐up time of 64 months, 10‐year event‐free survival and overall survival (OS) were 47·8% and 63·6%, respectively. None of the studied clinical and biological characteristics were associated with poorer outcome. Interestingly, patients with BCL6 rearrangement achieved a 10‐year OS of 100%, while patients with BCL2 rearrangement exhibited a poorer outcome compared to activated B‐cell tumours and germinal centre B‐cell without BCL2 rearranged tumours. Results achieved with DA‐EPOCH‐R showed a good long‐term outcome and a tolerable toxicity profile in high‐risk large B cell lymphoma patients. Outcome was not affected by tumour cell proliferation or by cell of origin, highlighting the requirement of new biological markers for patient subclassification of high‐risk DLBCL patients.     

Lenalidomide plus cyclophosphamide,doxorubicin, vincristine,prednisone and rituximab is safe and effective in untreated,elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a phase I study by the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi

Despite improvements in standard therapy with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone for patients with untreated, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, up to 40% of these patients relapse. Lenalidomide alone or in combination with rituximab has been shown to be active in relapsed/refractory aggressive lymphomas. In this phase I study we determined the maximum tolerated dose of lenalidomide plus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone in untreated, elderly (median age 68 years) patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Four lenalidomide doses (5, 10, 15, and 20 mg/day on days 1–14) allocated using the continual reassessment method were planned to be administered for 14 days in combination with each course of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone for a total of six courses. Seven cohorts of patients (n=3 in each cohort) were treated (total n=21) at 10, 20, 15, 15, 15, 10, and 10 mg of lenalidomide. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in seven patients during the first three courses of treatment. The third dose-level of lenalidomide (15 mg/day) was selected as the maximum tolerated dose, with an estimated probability of dose-limiting toxicities of 0.345 (95% credibility interval 0.164–0.553). Grade 3–4 hematologic adverse events were: neutropenia in 28% of the courses, thrombocytopenia in 9%, and anemia in 3%. Non-hematologic toxicities were moderate: grade 4 increase of creatinine phosphokinase (n=1), grade 3 cardiac (n=2), grade 3 neurological (n=3), and grade 3 gastrointestinal (n=1). In this phase I study, the overall response rate was 90%, with 81% achieving complete remission. This combination regimen appears safe in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and its efficacy will be assessed in the ongoing phase II trial. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT00907348","term_id":"NCT00907348"}}NCT00907348.     

Rituximab,cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin,vincristine and prednisolone (R‐CHOP) in the management of primary mediastinal B‐cell lymphoma: a subgroup analysis of the UK NCRI R‐CHOP 14 versus 21 trial

We performed a subgroup analysis of the phase III UK National Cancer Research Institute R‐CHOP‐14 versus R‐CHOP‐21 (two‐ versus three‐weekly rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone) trial to evaluate the outcomes for 50 patients with World Health Organization 2008 classified primary mediastinal B‐cell lymphoma identified from the trial database. At a median follow‐up of 7·2 years the 5‐year progression‐free survival and overall survival was 79·8% and 83·8%, respectively. An exploratory analysis raised the possibility of a better outcome in those who received R‐CHOP‐14 and time intensification may still, in the rituximab era, merit testing in a randomised trial in this subgroup of patients.     

Lenalidomide plus rituximab can produce durable clinical responses in patients with relapsed or refractory,indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphoma

This phase II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory, indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Patients were treated with daily lenalidomide in 28‐d cycles and weekly rituximab for 4 weeks. Lenalidomide was continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Twenty‐two patients were assessed for FCGR3A polymorphisms. Thirty patients were enrolled; 27 were evaluable for response. The overall response rate (ORR) was 74% including 44% complete responses (CR); median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 12·4 months. The 13 rituximab refractory patients had an ORR of 61·5% (four CR/unconfirmed CR). The ORR was 77% in the 22 follicular lymphoma patients (nine CR/unconfirmed CR). At a median follow‐up time of 43 months, the median duration of response and time to next therapy were 15·4 and 37·4 months, respectively. Most common grade 3/4 adverse events were lymphopenia (45%), neutropenia (55%), fatigue (23%) and hyponatraemia (9%). The ORR and PFS in patients with low‐affinity FCGR3A polymorphisms (F/F and F/V) suggest that lenalidomide may improve the activity of rituximab in these patients. These data suggest that combining lenalidomide with rituximab can produce durable responses with acceptable toxicity in patients with indolent NHL.     

Biweekly rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, non-pegylated liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin and prednisone (R-COMP-14) in elderly patients with poor-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and moderate to high 'life threat' impact cardiopathy

This Phase II study assessed feasibility and efficacy of a biweekly R-COMP-14 regimen (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, non-pegylated liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) in untreated elderly patients with poor-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and moderate to high 'life threat' impact NIA/NCI cardiac comorbidity. A total of 208 courses were delivered, with close cardiac monitoring, to 41 patients (median age: 73years, range: 62-82; 37% >75years) at a median interval of 15·6 (range, 13-29) days; 67% completed all six scheduled courses. Response rate was 73%, with 68% complete responses (CR); 4-year disease-free survival (DFS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) were 72% and 49%, respectively. Failures were due to early death (n=3), therapy discontinuations (no-response n=2; toxicity n=6), relapse (n=6) and death in CR (n=3). Incidence of cardiac grade 3-5 adverse events was 7/41 (17%; 95% confidence interval: 8-31%). Time to progression and overall survival at 4-years were 77% and 67%, respectively. The Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (aaCCI) correlated with failures (P=0·007) with patients scoring ≤7 having a longer TTF (66% vs. 29%; P=0·009). R-COMP-14 is feasible and ensures a substantial DFS to poor-risk DLBCL patients who would have been denied anthracycline-based treatment due to cardiac morbidity. The aaCCI predicted both treatment discontinuation rate and TTF.     

Monotherapy with pixantrone in histologically confirmed relapsed or refractory aggressive B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma: post‐hoc analyses from a phase III trial

This post hoc analysis of a phase 3 trial explored the effect of pixantrone in patients (50 pixantrone, 47 comparator) with relapsed or refractory aggressive B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) confirmed by centralized histological review. Patients received 28‐d cycles of 85 mg/m² pixantrone dimaleate (equivalent to 50 mg/m² in the approved formulation) on days 1, 8 and 15, or comparator. The population was subdivided according to previous rituximab use and whether they received the study treatment as 3rd or 4th line. Median number of cycles was 4 (range, 2–6) with pixantrone and 3 (2–6) with comparator. In 3rd or 4th line, pixantrone was associated with higher complete response (CR) (23·1% vs. 5·1% comparator, P = 0·047) and overall response rate (ORR, 43·6% vs. 12·8%, P = 0·005). In 3rd or 4th line with previous rituximab (20 pixantrone, 18 comparator), pixantrone produced better ORR (45·0% vs. 11·1%, P = 0·033), CR (30·0% vs. 5·6%, P = 0·093) and progression‐free survival (median 5·4 vs. 2·8 months, hazard ratio 0·52, 95% confidence interval 0·26–1·04) than the comparator. Similar results were found in patients without previous rituximab. There were no unexpected safety issues. Pixantrone monotherapy is more effective than comparator in relapsed or refractory aggressive B‐cell NHL in the 3rd or 4th line setting, independently of previous rituximab.     

A phase II study of dose‐dense and dose‐intense ABVD (ABVDDD‐DI) without consolidation radiotherapy in patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma

We explored activity and safety of a dose‐dense/dose‐intense adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine regimen (ABVD_DD‐DI) in 82 patients with advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma. Patients entered a two‐stage Bryant‐Day Phase II study to receive six cycles of ABVD_DD‐DI without consolidation radiotherapy. Cycles were supported with granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor and delivered every 21 d; drugs were administered on days 1 and 11 at the same doses of standard ABVD except for doxorubicin (35 mg/m²; first four cycles only). Co‐primary endpoints were complete response (CR) rate and severe acute cardiopulmonary toxicity; secondary endpoints were event‐free (EFS) and disease‐free survival (DFS). All patients received the four doxorubicin‐intensified courses and 96% concluded all six cycles (82·3% within the intended 18 weeks). This translated into a 66·9% increase of received dose‐intensity for doxorubicin and 31·8% for the other agents over standard ABVD. The CR rate was 95·1% (78/82) and 87·8% (72/82) achieved a metabolic CR after two cycles. Cardiopulmonary toxicity never exceeded grade 2 and affected 14·6% of patients. Most frequent toxicities were grade 4 neutropenia (10%) and anaemia (9%), grade 3 infection (17%) and grade 2 mucocutaneous changes (30%). Five‐year EFS and DFS was 88·3% and 93·7%, respectively. ABVD_DD‐DI regimen was well‐tolerated and ensured substantial CR and EFS rates without radiotherapy.     

Phase I trial of bortezomib in combination with rituximab‐HyperCVAD alternating with rituximab,methotrexate and cytarabine for untreated aggressive mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) outcomes have improved over the last two decades; however, late relapses occur. Bortezomib has shown single agent activity of 33% in relapsed MCL and has an additive/synergistic effect in vitro when combined with drugs currently used to treat MCL. We hypothesized that a combination of bortezomib with current intense non‐transplant chemoimmunotherapy might prevent late relapses. The toxicity of bortezomib when combined with methotrexate and cytarabine is unknown. Patients aged 18–79 years with untreated aggressive MCL were treated with R‐HyperCVAD (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone) alternating with rituximab‐methotrexate/cytarabine (R‐M/A). Bortezomib was added to the R‐Hyper‐CVAD combination as a fixed dose of 1·3 mg/m² IV on days 2 and 5 and was added to the R‐M/A regimen after rituximab, in increasing doses of 0·7, 1, and 1·3 mg/m² in cohorts of three patients. Twenty patients were assessed for toxicity of the regimen. The principal toxicity was haematological and did not differ from that observed with a similar regimen without the bortezomib. In particular, there was no pulmonary or neurological dose‐limiting toxicity, showing that bortezomib can be safely combined with R‐HyperCVAD and R‐M/A.