Donor apoptotic cell–based therapy for effective inhibition of donor‐specific memory T and B cells to promote long‐term allograft survival in allosensitized recipients

Allosensitization constitutes a major barrier in transplantation. Preexisting donor‐reactive memory T and B cells and preformed donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs) have all been implicated in accelerated allograft rejection in sensitized recipients. Here, we employ a sensitized murine model of islet transplantation to test strategies that promote long‐term immunosuppression‐free allograft survival. We demonstrate that donor‐specific memory T and B cells can be effectively inhibited by peritransplant infusions of donor apoptotic cells in combination with anti‐CD40L and rapamycin, and this treatment leads to significant prolongation of islet allograft survival in allosensitized recipients. We further demonstrate that late graft rejection in recipients treated with this regimen is associated with a breakthrough of B cells and their aggressive graft infiltration. Consequently, additional posttransplant B cell depletion effectively prevents late rejection and promotes permanent acceptance of islet allografts. In contrast, persistent low levels of DSAs do not seem to impair graft outcome in these recipients. We propose that B cells contribute to late rejection as antigen‐presenting cells for intragraft memory T cell expansion but not to alloantibody production and that a therapeutic strategy combining donor apoptotic cells, anti‐CD40L, and rapamycin effectively inhibits proinflammatory B cells and promotes long‐term islet allograft survival in such recipients.     

LFA‐1 Antagonism Inhibits Early Infiltration of Endogenous Memory CD8 T Cells into Cardiac Allografts and Donor‐Reactive T Cell Priming

Alloreactive memory T cells are present in virtually all transplant recipients due to prior sensitization or heterologous immunity and mediate injury undermining graft outcome. In mouse models, endogenous memory CD8 T cells infiltrate MHC‐mismatched cardiac allografts and produce IFN‐γ in response to donor class I MHC within 24 h posttransplant. The current studies analyzed the efficacy of anti‐LFA‐1 mAb to inhibit early CD8 T cell cardiac allograft infiltration and activation. Anti‐LFA‐1 mAb given to C57BL/6 6 (H‐2^b) recipients of A/J (H‐2^a) heart grafts on days –1 and 0 completely inhibited CD8 T cell allograft infiltration, markedly decreased neutrophil infiltration and significantly reduced intragraft expression levels of IFN‐γ‐induced genes. Donor‐specific T cells producing IFN‐γ were at low/undetectable numbers in spleens of anti‐LFA‐1 mAb treated recipients until day 21. These effects combined to promote substantial prolongation (from day 8 to 27) in allograft survival. Delaying anti‐LFA‐1 mAb treatment until days 3 and 4 posttransplant did not inhibit early memory CD8 T cell infiltration and proliferation within the allograft. These data indicate that peritransplant anti‐LFA‐1 mAb inhibits early donor‐reactive memory CD8 T cell allograft infiltration and inflammation suggesting an effective strategy to attenuate the negative effects of heterologous immunity in transplant recipients.     

The Immunobiology of Inductive Anti-CD40L Therapy in Transplantation: Allograft Acceptance is Not Dependent Upon the Deletion of Graft-Reactive T Cells

CD40–CD40L costimulatory interactions are crucial for allograft rejection, in that treatment with anti‐CD40L mAb markedly prolongs allograft survival in several systems. Recent reports indicate that costimulatory blockade results in deletion of graft‐reactive cells, which leads to allograft tolerance. To assess immunologic parameters that were influenced by inductive CD40–CD40L blockade, cardiac allograft recipients were treated with multiple doses of the anti‐CD40L mAb MR1, which was remarkably effective at prolonging allograft survival. Acute allograft rejection responses such as IL‐2 producing helper cell priming, Th1 priming, and alloantibody production were abrogated by anti‐CD40L treatment. Interestingly, the spleens of mice bearing long‐term cardiac allografts following inductive anti‐CD40L treatment retained precursor donor alloantigen‐reactive CTL, IL‐2 producing helper cells, and Th1 in numbers comparable to those observed in naïve mice. These mice retained the ability to reject donor‐strain skin allografts, but were incapable of rejecting the original cardiac allograft, or a second donor‐strain cardiac allograft. Further, differentiated effector cells were incapable of mediating rejection following adoptive transfer into mice bearing long‐term allografts, suggesting that regulatory cell function, rather than effector cell deletion was responsible for long‐term graft acceptance. Collectively, these data demonstrate that inductive CD40–CD40L blockade does not result in the deletion of graft‐reactive T cells, but induces the maintenance of these cells in a quiescent precursor state. They further point to a tissue specificity of this hyporesponsiveness, suggesting that not all donor alloantigen‐reactive cells are subject to this regulation.     

Regulatory T Cells Are Critical to Tolerance Induction in Presensitized Mouse Transplant Recipients Through Targeting Memory T Cells

Memory T cells are a significant barrier to induction of transplant tolerance. However, reliable means to target alloreactive memory T cells have remained elusive. In this study, presensitization of BALB/c mice with C57BL/6 skin grafts generated a large number of OX40⁺CD44^hieffector/memory T cells and resulted in rapid rejection of donor heart allografts. Recognizing that anti‐OX40L monoclonal antibody (mAb) (α‐OX40L) monotherapy prolonged graft survival through inhibition and apoptosis of memory T cells in presensitized recipients, α‐OX40L was added to the combined treatment protocol of LF15–0195 (LF) and anti‐CD45RB (α‐CD45RB) mAb—a protocol that induced heart allograft tolerance in non‐presensitized recipients but failed to induce tolerance in presensitized recipients. Interestingly, this triple therapy restored donor‐specific heart allograft tolerance in our presensitized model that was associated with induction of tolerogenic dendritic cells and CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺ T regulatory cells (Tregs). Of note, CD25⁺ T cell depletion in triple therapy recipients prevented establishment of allograft tolerance. In addition, adoptive transfer of donor‐primed effector/memory T cells into tolerant recipients markedly reduced levels of Tregs and broke tolerance. Our findings indicated that targeting memory T cells, by blocking OX40 costimulation in presensitized recipients was very important to expansion of Tregs, which proved critical to development of tolerance.     

Peritransplant VLA‐4 blockade inhibits endogenous memory CD8 T cell infiltration into high‐risk cardiac allografts and CTLA‐4Ig resistant rejection

Recipient endogenous memory CD8 T cells expressing reactivity to donor class I MHC infiltrate MHC‐mismatched cardiac allografts within 24 hours after reperfusion and express effector functions mediating graft injury. The current study tested the efficacy of Very Late Antigen‐4 (VLA‐4) blockade to inhibit endogenous memory CD8 T cell infiltration into cardiac allografts and attenuate early posttransplant inflammation. Peritransplant anti‐VLA‐4 mAb given to C57BL6 (H‐2^b) recipients of AJ (H‐2^a) heart allografts completely inhibited endogenous memory CD4 and CD8 T cell infiltration with significant decrease in macrophage, but not neutrophil, infiltration into allografts subjected to either minimal or prolonged cold ischemic storage (CIS) prior to transplant, reduced intra‐allograft IFN‐γ‐induced gene expression and prolonged survival of allografts subjected to prolonged CIS in CTLA‐4Ig treated recipients. Anti‐VLA‐4 mAb also inhibited priming of donor‐specific T cells producing IFN‐γ until at least day 7 posttransplant. Peritransplant anti‐VLA plus anti‐CD154 mAb treatment similarly prolonged survival of allografts subjected to minimal or increased CIS prior to transplant. Overall, these data indicate that peritransplant anti‐VLA‐4 mAb inhibits early infiltration memory CD8 T cell infiltration into allografts with a marked reduction in early graft inflammation suggesting an effective strategy to attenuate negative effects of heterologous alloimmunity in recipients of higher risk grafts.     

Antibody‐Mediated Rejection of Single Class I MHC‐Disparate Cardiac Allografts

Murine CCR5^?/? recipients produce high titers of antibody to complete MHC‐mismatched heart and renal allografts. To study mechanisms of class I MHC antibody‐mediated allograft injury, we tested the rejection of heart allografts transgenically expressing a single class I MHC disparity in wild‐type C57BL/6 (H‐2^b) and B6.CCR5^?/? recipients. Donor‐specific antibody titers in CCR5^?/? recipients were 30‐fold higher than in wild‐type recipients. B6.K^d allografts survived longer than 60 days in wild‐type recipients whereas CCR5^?/? recipients rejected all allografts within 14 days. Rejection was accompanied by infiltration of CD8 T cells, neutrophils and macrophages, and C4d deposition in the graft capillaries. B6.K^d allografts were rejected by CD8^?/?/CCR5^?/?, but not μMT^?/?/CCR5^?/?, recipients indicating the need for antibody but not CD8 T cells. Grafts recovered at day 10 from CCR5^?/? and CD8^?/?/CCR5^?/? recipients and from RAG‐1^?/? allograft recipients injected with anti‐K^d antibodies expressed high levels of perforin, myeloperoxidase and CCL5 mRNA. These studies indicate that the continual production of antidonor class I MHC antibody can mediate allograft rejection, that donor‐reactive CD8 T cells synergize with the antibody to contribute to rejection, and that expression of three biomarkers during rejection can occur in the absence of this CD8 T cell activity.     

CD8+ T‐Cell Depletion and Rapamycin Synergize with Combined Coreceptor/Stimulation Blockade to Induce Robust Limb Allograft Tolerance in Mice

The growing development of composite tissue allografts (CTA) highlights the need for tolerance induction protocols. Herein, we developed a mouse model of heterotopic limb allograft in a stringent strain combination in which potentially tolerogenic strategies were tested taking advantage of donor stem cells in the grafted limb. BALB/c allografts were transplanted into C57BL/6 mice treated with anti‐CD154 mAb, nondepleting anti‐CD4 combined to either depleting or nondepleting anti‐CD8 mAbs. Some groups received additional rapamycin. Both depleting and nondepleting mAb combinations without rapamycin only delayed limb allograft rejection, whereas the addition of rapamycin induced long‐term allograft survival in both combinations. Nevertheless, robust donor‐specific tolerance, defined by the acceptance of a fresh donor‐type skin allograft and simultaneous rejection of third‐party grafts, required initial CD8⁺ T‐cell depletion. Mixed donor‐recipient chimerism was observed in lymphoid organs and recipient bone marrow of tolerant but not rejecting animals. Tolerance specificity was confirmed by the inability to produce IL‐2, IFN‐γ and TNF‐α in MLC with donor antigen while significant alloreactivity persisted against third‐ party alloantigens. Collectively, these results show that robust CTA tolerance and mixed donor‐recipient chimerism can be achieved in response to the synergizing combination of rapamycin, transient CD8⁺ T‐cell depletion and costimulation/coreceptor blockade.     

Primed allospecific T cells prevent the effects of costimulatory blockade on prolonged cardiac allograft survival in mice.

Costimulatory blockade can induce long‐term allograft survival in naïve animals, but may not be as effective in animals with previously primed immune repertoires. We attempted to induce long‐term graft survival in B10.D2 recipients of B10.A cardiac allografts using donor‐specific transfusion (DST) plus anti‐CD40 ligand antibody (αCD40L). Recipients were either naïve mice, or mice previously primed to B10.A or third party alloantigens through engraftment and rejection of skin transplants. Untreated naïve mice rejected cardiac transplants by day 15 and contained a high frequency of primed, donor‐reactive T cells. Donor‐specific transfusion/αCD40L treatment of naïve animals induced long‐term graft survival associated with low frequencies of donor‐reactive T cells. Previous priming of donor‐specific T cells through rejection of B10.A, but not third party, skin grafts prevented the effects of DST/αCD40L on prolonging survival of B10.A hearts. Moreover, adoptive transfer of CD3+, CD4+ or CD8+ T cells from B10.A skin‐graft‐primed animals prevented the effects of DST/αCD40L. The data demonstrate that animals with immune repertoires containing previously primed, donor‐reactive T cells are resistant to the effects of costimulatory blockade. The findings have important implications for ongoing, costimulatory blockade‐based trials in humans, whose T‐cell repertoires are known to contain memory alloreactive T cells.     

Endogenous Memory CD8 T Cells Are Activated Within Cardiac Allografts Without Mediating Rejection

Endogenous memory CD8 T cells infiltrate MHC‐mismatched cardiac allografts within 12–24 h posttransplant in mice and are activated to proliferate and produce IFN‐γ. To more accurately assess the graft injury directly imposed by these endogenous memory CD8 T cells, we took advantage of the ability of anti‐LFA‐1 mAb given to allograft recipients on days 3 and 4 posttransplant to inhibit the generation of primary effector T cells. When compared to grafts from IgG‐treated recipients on day 7 posttransplant, allografts from anti‐LFA‐1 mAb‐treated recipients had increased numbers of CD8 T cells but these grafts had marked decreases in expression levels of mRNA encoding effector mediators associated with graft injury and decreases in donor‐reactive CD8 T cells producing IFN‐γ. Despite this decreased activity within the allograft, CD8 T cells in allografts from recipients treated with anti‐LFA‐1 mAb continued to proliferate up to day 7 posttransplant and did not upregulate expression of the exhaustion marker LAG‐3 but did have decreased expression of ICOS. These results indicate that endogenous memory CD8 T cells infiltrate and proliferate in cardiac allografts in mice but do not express sufficient levels of functions to mediate overt graft injury and acute rejection.     

Transplant Acceptance Following Anti‐CD4 Versus Anti‐CD40L Therapy: Evidence for Differential Maintenance of Graft‐Reactive T Cells

Inductive therapy with anti‐CD4 or anti‐CD40L monoclonal antibodies (mAb) leads to long‐term allograft acceptance but the immune parameters responsible for graft maintenance are not well understood. This study employed an adoptive transfer system in which cells from mice bearing long‐term cardiac allografts following inductive anti‐CD4 or anti‐CD40L therapy were transferred into severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) allograft recipients. SCID recipients of cells from anti‐CD4‐treated mice (anti‐CD4 cells) did not reject allografts while those receiving cells from anti‐CD40L‐treated mice (anti‐CD40L cells) did reject allografts. Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) labeling of transferred cells revealed that this difference was not associated with differential proliferative capacities of these cells in SCID recipients. Like cells from naïve mice, anti‐CD40L cells mounted a Th1 response following transfer while anti‐CD4 cells mounted a dominant Th2 response. Early (day 10) T‐cell priming was detectable in both groups of primary allograft recipients but persisted to day 30 only in recipients treated with anti‐CD4 mAb. Thus, anti‐CD40L therapy appears to result in graft‐reactive T cells with a naïve phenotype while anti‐CD4 therapy allows progression to an altered state of differentiation. Additional data herein support the notion that anti‐CD40L mAb targets activated, but not memory, cells for removal or functional silencing.     

Differential Requirement of CD27 Costimulatory Signaling for Naïve Versus Alloantigen‐Primed Effector/Memory CD8+ T Cells

CD8⁺ memory T cells endanger allograft survival by causing acute and chronic rejection and prevent tolerance induction. We explored the role of CD27:CD70 T‐cell costimulatory pathway in alloreactive CD8⁺/CD4⁺ T‐cell activation. CD27‐deficient (CD27^?/?) and wild‐type (WT) B6 mice rejected BALB/c cardiac allografts at similar tempo, with or without depletion of CD4⁺ or CD8⁺ T cells, suggesting that CD27 is not essential during primary T‐cell alloimmune responses. To dissect the role of CD27 in primed effector and memory alloreactive T cells, CD27^?/? or WT mice were challenged with BALB/c hearts either 10 or 40 days after sensitization with donor‐type skin grafts. Compared to WT controls, allograft survival was prolonged in day 40‐ but not day 10‐sensitized CD27^?/? recipients. Improved allograft survival was accompanied by diminished secondary responsiveness of memory CD8⁺ T cells, which resulted from deficiency in memory formation rather than their lack of secondary expansion. Chronic allograft vasculopathy and fibrosis were diminished in CD27^?/? recipients of class I‐ but not class II‐mismatched hearts as compared to WT controls. These data establish a novel role for CD27 as an important costimulatory molecule for alloreactive CD8⁺ memory T cells in acute and chronic allograft rejection.     

B Cell Depletion With an Anti‐CD20 Antibody Enhances Alloreactive Memory T Cell Responses After Transplantation

Alloreactive memory T cells mediate accelerated allograft rejection and transplant tolerance resistance. Recent studies have shown that B cell deficient–μMT mice fail to mount donor‐specific memory T cell responses after transplantation. At the same time, other studies showed that pretransplant B cell depletion using rituximab (IgG1 anti‐CD20 mAb) combined with cyclosporine A promoted the survival of islet allografts in monkeys. In this study, we investigated the effect of anti‐CD20 antibody‐mediated B cell depletion on the memory T cell alloresponse in mice. Wild‐type and anti‐OVA TCR transgenic mice were treated with an IgG2a anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibody, which depleted nearly all B cells in the peripheral blood and secondary lymphoid organs but spared some B cells in the bone marrow. B cell depletion did not affect the direct alloresponse but resulted in a marked increase of indirect alloresponse after skin transplantation of naïve mice. Furthermore, in allosensitized mice, anti‐CD20 mAb treatment enhanced the reactivation of allospecific memory T cells and accelerated second set rejection of skin allografts. This suggests that the effect of anti‐CD20 antibodies on alloimmunity and allograft rejection might vary upon the nature of the antibodies as well as the circumstances under which they are delivered.     

Hyperlipidemia Promotes Anti‐Donor Th17 Responses That Accelerate Allograft Rejection

Hyperlipidemia occurs in 95% of organ transplant recipients, however its effect on organ allograft rejection has not been investigated. We found that induction of hyperlipidemia in mice caused a significant acceleration of rejection of cardiac allografts. Accelerated rejection was associated with an aggressive T cell infiltrate that mediated significant tissue damage as well as increased serum levels of the proinflammatory cytokines IL‐2, IL‐6, and IL‐17. Hyperlipidemic mice had an increased number of Th17 cells in their periphery and rejecting allografts from hyperlipidemic mice contained significant numbers of IL‐17 producing T cells that were not detectable in transplants harvested from controls. Neutralization or genetic ablation of IL‐17 prolonged survival of cardiac allografts transplanted into hyperlipidemic recipients, suggesting that IL‐17 production promotes accelerated rejection. Analysis of alloreactive T cell frequencies directly ex vivo in naïve mice revealed that the frequency of donor reactive IL‐17 producing cells in hyperlipidemic was increased prior to antigen exposure, suggesting that hyperlipidemia was sufficient to alter T cell alloreactivity and promote anti‐donor Th17 responses on first exposure to antigen. Together, our data suggest that hyperlipidemia alters rejection by altering the types of T cell subsets that respond to donor antigen by promoting Th17 biased anti‐donor reactivity.     

Memory T cell–mediated rejection is mitigated by FcγRIIB expression on CD8+ T cells

Donor‐reactive memory T cells generated via heterologous immunity represent a potent barrier to long‐term graft survival following transplantation because of their increased precursor frequency, rapid effector function, altered trafficking patterns, and reduced reliance on costimulation signals for activation. Thus, the identification of pathways that control memory T cell survival and secondary recall potential may provide new opportunities for therapeutic intervention. Here, we discovered that donor‐specific effector/memory CD8⁺ T cell populations generated via exposure to acute vs latent vs chronic infections contain differential frequencies of CD8⁺ T cells expressing the inhibitory Fc receptor FcγRIIB. Results indicated that frequencies of FcγRIIB‐expressing CD8⁺ donor‐reactive memory T cells inversely correlated with allograft rejection. Furthermore, adoptive T cell transfer of Fcgr2b^?/? CD8⁺ T cells resulted in an accumulation of donor‐specific CD8⁺ memory T cells and enhanced recall responses, indicating that FcγRIIB functions intrinsically to limit T cell CD8⁺ survival in vivo. Lastly, we show that deletion of FcγRIIB on donor‐specific CD8⁺ memory T cells precipitated costimulation blockade‐resistant rejection. These data therefore identify a novel cell‐intrinsic inhibitory pathway that functions to limit the risk of memory T cell–mediated rejection following transplantation and suggest that therapeutic manipulation of this pathway could improve outcomes in sensitized patients.     

Neutralizing IL-7 Promotes Long-Term Allograft Survival Induced by CD40/CD40L Costimulatory Blockade

Memory T cells are somewhat resistant to immunosuppresion. They therefore pose a threat to inducing long‐term allograft survival. IL‐7 is essential for memory T‐cell generation. Here, we investigated whether neutralizing IL‐7 promotes allograft survival. We found that neutralizing IL‐7 alone did not significantly prolong allograft survival. However, blocking both IL‐7 and CD154 signaling synergistically prolonged allograft survival. In contrast, neutralizing IL‐2 failed to further prolong allograft survival induced by CD40/CD154 costimulatory blockade. Allospecific memory CD8+ T‐cell generation was severely impaired under the treatment of anti‐IL‐7 plus anti‐CD154 Ab while administering recombinant IL‐7 enhanced CD8+ memory generation even under donor‐specific transfusion plus anti‐CD154 Ab treatment. Neutralizing IL‐7, but not IL‐2, together with blocking CD154 synergistically suppressed the proliferation of naïve/effector CD8+ T cells infiltrating grafts. Nevertheless, neutralizing IL‐7 did not alter regulatory T‐cell generation while neutralizing IL‐2 suppressed their generation. Hence, targeting IL‐7 represents a new strategy to prolong allograft survival by acting on both naïve and memory T cells. Long‐term allograft survival may be achieved by neutralizing IL‐7 plus CD40/CD154 blockade, since CD40/CD154 costimulatory blockade prevents acute rejection while neutralizing IL‐7 suppresses the generation of memory T cells that persist and mediate late or chronic rejection.     

Prevention of Chronic Rejection with Immunoregulatory Cells Induced by Intrathymic Immune Modulation with Class I Allopeptides

Intrathymic immune modulation with RT1.A^a allopeptides in the PVG.R8‐to‐PVG.1 U rat strain combination leads to long‐term survival of cardiac allografts. This regimen, however, does not induce transplantation tolerance, since most long‐surviving allografts undergo chronic rejection. We investigated recipients with chronic rejection for donor‐specific immune nonresponsiveness and immunoregulatory cells as possible mechanisms responsible for long‐term graft survival. There was a significant reduction in the proliferative response of T cells from long‐term allograft recipients to donor alloantigens as compared with that of naïve T cells. Adoptive transfer of splenocytes from intrathymically manipulated primary long‐term graft survivors into minimally irradiated secondary hosts resulted in indefinite survival of > 80% of allografts, providing evidence for immunoregulatory cells. Secondary recipients had total absence of donor‐reactive cellular and humoral responses. Immunoregulation was also transferable from secondary to tertiary graft recipients. More importantly, there was a significant reduction in the incidence of chronic rejection in secondary hosts (> 85%) and complete prevention of acute and chronic rejection in tertiary hosts. This study demonstrates that intrathymic immunomodulation with class I allopeptides results in the generation of immunoregulatory cells that do not block chronic rejection in primary hosts where they develop, but prevent both acute and chronic allograft rejection when adoptively transferred into secondary and tertiary recipients.     

IL‐17 Deficiency Attenuates Allograft Injury and Prolongs Survival in a Murine Model of Fully MHC‐Mismatched Renal Allograft Transplantation

IL‐17 is a pro‐inflammatory cytokine implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. However the role of IL‐17 in renal allograft rejection has not been fully explored. Here, we investigate the impact of IL‐17 in a fully MHC‐mismatched, life‐sustaining, murine model of kidney allograft rejection using IL‐17 deficient donors and recipients (IL‐17^?/? allografts). IL‐17^?/? allografts exhibited prolonged survival which was associated with reduced expression of the Th1 cytokine IFN‐γ and histological attenuation of acute and chronic allograft rejection, as compared to wild‐type allograft recipients. Results were confirmed in WT allograft recipients treated with an IL‐17 blocking antibody. Subsequent experiments using either donors or recipients deficient in IL‐17 showed a trend towards prolongation of survival only when recipients were IL‐17^?/?. Administration of a depleting anti‐CD25 antibody to IL‐17^?/? recipients abrogated the survival advantage conferred by IL‐17 deficiency, suggesting the involvement of a CD4⁺CD25⁺ T cell regulatory mechanism. Therefore, IL‐17 deficiency or neutralization was protective against the development of kidney allograft rejection, which may be mediated by impairment of Th1 responses and/or enhanced protection by Tregs.

     

T-lymphocyte homeostasis and function in infant baboons: implications for transplantation

Laboratory mice are born lymphopenic and demonstrate lymphopenia‐induced proliferation that generates memory T cells, yet they are prone to immunologic tolerance. Here we tested whether these fundamental immunologic observations apply to higher animals by studying the immune system of infant baboons. Using flow cytometry of the peripheral blood cells, it was found that baboons are born relatively lymphopenic and subsequently expand their initially naïve T cell pool with increasing numbers of memory T cells. After transplantation of an artery patch allograft or xenograft, non‐immunosuppressed recipients readily mounted an immune response against donor‐type antigens, as evidenced by mixed lymphocyte reaction. Immunosuppression with anti‐thymocyte globulin (ATG), anti‐CD154 mAb, and mycophenolate mofetil prevented T cell‐mediated rejection. After lymphocyte depletion with ATG, homeostatic T cell proliferation was observed. In conclusion, the baboon proved a suitable model to investigate the infant immune system. In this study, neonatal lymphopenia and expansion of the memory T cell population were observed but, unlike mice, there were no indications that infant baboons are prone to T cell tolerance. The expansion of memory T cells during the neonatal period or after induction therapy may actually form an obstacle to tapering immunosuppressive therapy, or ultimately achieving immunologic tolerance.     

The immunobiology of pig‐to‐nonhuman primate islet xenotransplantation: insights,innovation, and impact

Previous studies of pig‐to‐non‐human primate (NHP) islet xenotransplantation have provided important insights into the immune recognition and effector pathways operative in this relevant preclinical model. The specifics of the xenograft product, microenvironment at the implantation site, and the immunosuppressive regimen significantly influence the mechanisms underlying the rejection of xenogeneic islets. Our current understanding of the immunological barriers to survival of pig islets in NHPs is largely based on studies on intraportal islet xenografts and on comparisons with islet allografts. The demonstration of cell‐mediated rejection of intraportal porcine islet xenografts at about 1 month posttransplant in monkeys immunosuppressed with the same protocols that prevent monkey islet allograft rejection indicates that islet xenograft rejection involves cellular mechanisms that are not present in acute islet allograft rejection. While these mechanisms remain poorly defined the demonstration of long‐term diabetes reversal after intraportal islet xenotransplantation in non‐human primates immunosuppressed with anti‐CD40L but not with anti‐CD40 antibody‐based protocols suggests that the therapeutic efficacy of anti‐CD40L in this transplantation setting likely involves the depletion of donor‐reactive, activated T cells besides CD40:CD40L costimulation blockade. Rejection of intraportal islet xenografts in NHPs immunosuppressed with CTLA4‐Ig and rapamycin was mediated largely by IL‐15‐primed, CXCR3+CD8+ memory T cells recruited by IP‐10 (CXCL10) positive pig islets and macrophages that showed staining for IL‐12 and iNOS. Adding basiliximab induction and tacrolimus maintenance therapy to this protocol prevented rejection in 24 of 26 recipients followed for up to 275 days. Comparison of both groups suggests, though by no means conclusive, that prolongation of graft survival in this large cohort was associated with reduced direct T cell responses to xenoantigens, reduced proportion of intrahepatic (intragraft) B cells and IFN‐γ+ and IL‐17+ CD4 and CD8 T cells, and increased local production of immunoregulatory molecules linked with Tregs, including TGF‐β, Foxp3, HO‐1, and IL‐10. Anti‐pig non‐Gal IgG antibody elicitation was suppressed in both groups. We are currently exploring the concept of negative vaccination to markedly minimize the need for immunosuppression in islet xenotransplantation. Peritransplant administration of donor apoptotic cells extended pig‐to‐mouse islet xenograft survival to >250 days when combined with peritransplant B cell‐depletion and rapamycin. This costimulation blockade‐sparing, antigen‐specific immunotherapy is expected to cause rapid pretransplant clonal deletion of indirect and anergy of direct xenospecific T cells while inducing regulatory T cells. As anti‐CD40L antibodies, B cell depleting antibodies are expected to interfere with indirect antigen presentation, costimulation, and cytokine production required for optimal T cell proliferation, memory formation, and intragraft CD8+ effector function. It is conceivable that additional strategies must be employed in NHPs and eventually in diabetic patients to achieve – as previously with anti‐CD40L antibodies – more complete, yet selective depletion of donor‐reactive, activated T‐cells for the purpose of stable xenograft acceptance.     

Different Mechanisms Control Peripheral and Central Tolerance in Hematopoietic Chimeric Mice

Regulatory T cells (Treg) are important in peripheral tolerance, but their role in establishing and maintaining hematopoietic mixed chimerism and generating central tolerance is unclear. We now show that costimulation blockade using a donor‐specific transfusion and anti‐CD154 antibody applied to mice given bone marrow and simultaneously transplanted with skin allografts leads to hematopoietic chimerism and permanent skin allograft survival. Chimeric mice bearing intact skin allografts fail to generate effector/memory T cells against allogeneic targets as shown by the absence of IFNγ‐producing CD44^highCD8⁺ T cells and in vivo cytotoxicity. Depletion of Tregs by injection of anti‐CD4 or anti‐CD25 antibody prior to costimulation blockade prevents chimerism, shortens skin allograft survival and leads to generation of effector/memory cytotoxic T cells. Depletion of Tregs by injection of anti‐CD4 or anti‐CD25 antibody two months after transplantation leads to loss of skin allografts even though mice remain chimeric and exhibit little in vivo cytotoxicity. In contrast, chimerism is lost, but skin allografts survive following naïve T‐cell injection. We conclude that hematopoietic chimerism and peripheral tolerance may be maintained by different mechanisms in mixed hematopoietic chimeras.