Phase II trial of cytarabine, cisplatin and vindesine for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Thirty-two patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were entered in this study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a chemotherapy schedule including cisplatin (C) 40 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on days 1-3; vindesine (V) 3 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, and cytarabine (ara-C) 15 mg/m2 subcutaneously every 12 hours on days 1-3 (total dose: 90 mg/m2). Cisplatin was administered simultaneously with one dose of ara-C. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Five patients out of 28 (18%) fully evaluable for response presented partial remissions. No complete response was observed. Median survival was 8 months and median duration of response was 4 months. Hematologic toxicity was severe in 3 patients. There were no toxicity-related deaths. Other adverse reactions included nausea and vomiting, alopecia and peripheral neuropathy. We conclude that this chemotherapy combination is marginally effective against NSCLC showing in this group of patients a low number of responses of short duration without a significant impact on survival.     

A randomized trial comparing vindesine plus cisplatin with mitomycin C, vindesine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Thirty-six evaluable patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer were randomized to treatments involving vindesine (3 mg/m2 X 3) plus cisplatin (80-120 mg/m2) versus mitomycin C (8 mg/m2) plus vindesine (2 mg/m2 X 3) plus cisplatin (80-120 mg/m2). The response rate for the vindesine and cisplatin combination was 29%, versus 47% for the mitomycin C, vindesine and cisplatin combination. There was no evidence of improved duration of response in patients given mitomycin C, vindesine and cisplatin. The median survival for patients given mitomycin C, vindesine and cisplatin was 11.4 months, compared with 10.3 months for those given vindesine and cisplatin. Toxicity was almost comparable for the two treatments. The utility of addition of mitomycin C to vindesine and cisplatin should be evaluated in further investigations.     

Vinorelbine and carboplatin in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer: a monoinstitutional phase II study

Chemotherapy regimens for patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) provide typically palliation or limited symptom-free survival. We investigated the efficacy, in terms of response rate and time to progression, of a combination chemotherapy containing carboplatin and vinorelbine as a first-line treatment for inoperable NSCLC. Fifty-two consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with carboplatin AUC 6 according to Calvert's formula on day 1, combined with vinorelbine, 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8. Therapy was given every 3 weeks. The median age was 66 years (range, 40-80); ECOG performance status was 0 in 20, 1 in 25 and 2 in 7 patients. According to an intent-to-treat analysis, response rate (partial and complete responses) in 52 assessable patients was 18/52 (34.6%; 95% confidence interval, 22-47%). In addition, 16 patients (30.8%) had stable disease and 18/52 (34.6%; 95% CI, 22-47%) progressed while on treatment. Median time to progression and overall survival were 7, 5 and 12.3 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 granulocytopenia was observed in 18/8 patients (34.6/15.4%). Grade 3/4 nadirs generally lasted no more than 7 days, and no neutropenic fever was reported. The treatment was generally very well tolerated: grade 1 or 2 nausea and vomiting was observed in 12 and 4 patients, respectively, and grade 2 neuropathy in 5% of cases. Statistical analysis did not highlight any significant differences in clinical benefit (partial and complete responses and stable disease), time to progression, or grade 3-4 hematologic and non-hematological toxicity according to age (65 years). Carboplatin AUC 6 and vinorelbine was found to be an efficacious regimen as a first-line treatment for inoperable lung cancer patients and was also subjectively very well tolerated in aged patients. The regimen warrants further investigation in the emerging subgroup of aged patients in order to draw firm conclusions.     

Treatment of inoperable non-small cell lung carcinoma stage IIIb and IV with cisplatin, epidoxorubicin, vindesine and lonidamine: a phase II study

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The polychemotherapeutic regimen PEV (cisplatin, epidoxorubicin and vindesine) + lonidamine proved to be valid in terms of activity and efficacy in the treatment of patients with advanced, previously untreated non-small cell lung carcinoma. The goal of the study was to verify whether a different dose of lonidamine, together with an increase in cisplatin and epidoxorubicin compared to the standard regimen, is able to improve the activity and efficacy of PEV without increasing toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients were treated with cisplatin (80 mg/m2/i.v.), epidoxorubicin (70 mg/m2/i.v.) and vindesine (3 mg/m2/i.v.) every 28 days for 6 courses in combination with lonidamine (600 mg/day on days 1 and 2 of each course followed by 450 mg/day until progression of disease or intolerance). All the patients were monitored for clinical response, median duration of response and survival and for toxicity. RESULTS: The clinical response in the 29 assessable patients was: 41.4% partial remission, 48.3% stable disease, and 10.3% progression of disease. The median duration of response was 8.5 months (range, 4-26+) and median survival was 12 months (range, 4-26+). Survival was above the median in 15 stage IIIb patients, and 2 patients were long survivors at 26+ months. The toxicity of PEV + lonidamine was mild; there were no toxic deaths nor acute toxicity of grade 4 according to the WHO scoring system. CONCLUSIONS: Our polychemotherapeutic regimen proved to be valid in terms of activity and efficacy, and a further dose increase in single chemotherapeutic agents as well as lonidamine could therefore be justified.     

A randomized trial in inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer: vindesine and cisplatin versus mitomycin, vindesine, and cisplatin versus etoposide and cisplatin alternating with vindesine and mitomycin.

Patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomly assigned to receive one of three dosage regimens: (1) vindesine and cisplatin (VP); (2) mitomycin, vindesine, and cisplatin (MVP); or (3) etoposide and cisplatin alternating with vindesine and mitomycin (EP/VM). In 199 assessable patients, the response rates were VP, 33%; MVP, 43%; and EP/VM, 19%. The addition of mitomycin to the VP regimen did not significantly improve the response rate. The response rate was significantly lower with the EP/VM regimen than with the MVP regimen (P less than .01). The median survival times were VP, 50 weeks; MVP, 42 weeks; and EP/VM, 40 weeks. These differences were not significant. Grade III or IV thrombocytopenia was significantly greater (P less than .01) in MVP patients (22%) than in the VP (5%). Other toxicities were similar in the three groups. Analyses of prognostic factors showed that treatment with MVP, sex, and histologic classification (squamous cell carcinoma) were predictive of improved response. Important factors for improved survival, according to the Cox regression analysis, were the stage of disease, performance status, sex, weight loss before diagnosis, and hemoglobin concentration.     

Phase II study of vindesine in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

A phase II study of vindesine (VDS) was carried out in 21 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There were 13 and 8 patients with and without prior chemotherapy, respectively. VDS was administered at a weekly iv dose of 3 mg/m2. Partial response was observed in two of 15 adenocarcinomas and one of 2 adenosquamous cell carcinomas, and the overall response rate was 14.3% (3/21). Myelosuppression, especially leukopenia, was the most common dose-limiting side effect. Neurotoxicity was also a common side effect but the degree was mild. It was concluded that VDS at a dose of 3 mg/m2 every week seems to be active against NSCLC.     

Phase II study of carboplatin,cisplatin, and vindesine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Cisplatin in combination with vindesine has been widely used for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), producing an overall response rate of 32%. We conducted a phase II study to examine whether the addition of carboplatin to the combination of cisplatin and vindesine would improve the antitumor activity of the two platinum agents in advanced NSCLC without increasing their toxicity. Carboplatin (240 mg/m²) and vindesine (3 mg/m²) were given intravenously on day 1 and cisplatin (60 mg/m²) and vindesine (3 mg/m²), on day 8. Of the 40 evaluable patients with advanced NSCLC, 12 showed a partial response, for an overall response rate of 30% (95% confidence interval, 17%–47%). The median duration of response was 12 weeks, and the median survival duration for all patients was 38 weeks. The major toxicity was hematologic: leukopenia (WHO grade3) was observed in 21 patients (53%) and anemia (WHO grade3), in 13 patients (33%). However, thrombocytopenia was mild and WHO grade 3 toxicity was observed in only 4 patients (10%). Nonhematologic toxicities consisted mainly of WHO grade2 nausea and vomiting in 16 patients (40%) and WHO grade2 alopecia in 11 patients (28%). No significant nephrotoxicity or neurotoxicity was seen. Our findings indicate that the addition of carboplatin to the combination of cisplatin and vindesine does not improve antitumor activity in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Randomized,multicenter, phase II study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine plus carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: We conducted a phase II randomized study to assess the efficacy, with response as the primary endpoint, and the toxicity of gemcitabine/cisplatin (GP) and gemcitabine/carboplatin (GC) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients were randomized to GP (gemcitabine 1200 mg/m(2), days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) day 2) or GC (gemcitabine 1200 mg/m(2), days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin AUC=5 day 2). Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were randomized to GP and 58 to GC. A total of 533 cycles were delivered (264 GP, 269 GC), with a median of four cycles/patient. The objective response rate was 41.9% (95% C.I., 29.6-54.2%) for GP and 31.0% (95% C.I., 18.2-42.8%) for GC (P=0.29). No significant differences between arms were observed in median survival (10.4 months GP, 10.8 months GC) and median time to progression (5.4 months GP, 5.1 months GC). Both regimens were very well tolerated with no statistical differences between arms in grade 3/4 toxicities. When all toxicity grades were combined, emesis, neuropathy and renal toxicity occurred more frequently on the GP arm (P<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: GC arm did not provide a significant difference in response rate compared with GP arm, with better overall tolerability. Carboplatin could be a valid alternative to cisplatin in the palliative setting.     

A phase II study of vindesine for pretreated non-small cell lung cancer

A phase II evaluation of vindesine (VDS) was performed in 16 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (ten patients with adenocarcinoma, six patients with squamous cell carcinoma, and one patient with large cell carcinoma). All except one of the patients had had prior chemotherapy. VDS at a dose of 3 mg/m2 was given intravenously every week for more than three weeks. Among 16 evaluable patients, two patients with pretreated adenocarcinoma of the lung showed partial response. The response rate for VDS was 12.5%. Toxic effects included leukopenia (94%), anemia (44%), thrombopenia (13%), alopecia (38%), peripheral neurotoxicity (38%), liver injury (19%), constipation (13%), anorexia (13%), nausea (13%), stomatitis (6%) and fever (6%).     

Activity of gemcitabine and carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial

This phase II trial was designed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine combined with carboplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Patients were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle and carboplatin AUC 5 mg/ml/min on day 2 of each cycle. Fifty patients (Zubrod-ECOG-WHO performance status 0/1 in 70/30%, stage IV disease in 64%) entered the study and were evaluable for response and toxicity. There was 1 complete response and 24 partial responses among 50 evaluable patients, for a response rate of 50% (95% CI: 36.0-64.1%). The median survival time was 13 months (range: 6-22 months), and the 1-year survival rate was 54%. Hematologic toxicities included grades 3 and 4 neutropenia in 24 and 8% of patients, respectively, and grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia in 48 and 8% of patients, respectively. These were without clinical sequelae. Seven (14%) patients had grade 3 nausea and vomiting. The combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin is highly active and well tolerated in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC.     

Phase II trial of docetaxel in Asian patients with inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Docetaxel has a response rate of greater than 30% in first-line treatment of Western patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The goal of this open-label. phase II study was to evaluate the activity and safety profile of docetaxel in Asian patients with inoperable untreated stage III NSCLC. Docetaxel was given at 100 mg/m2 as a 1-h infusion every 3 weeks. Prophylactic dexamethasone was given to reduce hypersensitivity reactions and edema. Thirty-five patients were enrolled in the study. The response rate was 34% (95% CI, 19%-50%) according to intent-to-treat analysis. No complete response was observed. Twenty-four patients (69%) had grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in cycle 1, and febrile neutropenia was seen in 12 patients. Six patients (17%) experienced mild fluid retention. Docetaxel is an active agent in first-line treatment of Asian patients with locally advanced NSCLC, with the main toxicity being neutropenia. Fluid retention was a minor problem in this study.     

A phase I/II trial of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and gemcitabine in untreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Paclitaxel and carboplatin is widely used in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, median survival remains < 1 year. One strategy to improve survival is to add a third active drug with a differing mechanism of action. Gemcitabine is a novel antimetabolite with considerable activity in NSCLC. The primary objective of this Phase I/II study was to determine the maximally tolerated dose of gemcitabine administered with fixed doses of paclitaxel and carboplatin in untreated patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Combination chemotherapy of ifosfamide, cisplatin and vindesine for non-small cell lung cancer

Twenty patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer were treated with a combination chemotherapy consisting of ifosfamide (IFX), cisplatin (CDDP) and vindesine (VDS). The treatment schedule was IFX 1.3 g/m2 i.v., on days 1-5, CDDP 20 mg/m2 i.v., on days 1-5, and VDS 3 mg/m2 i.v., on days 1 & 8, and, in principle, the regimen was repeated every 4 weeks. Of 19 evaluable patients, there were 1 CR, 7 PR, 10 NC and 1 PD, with an overall response rate of 42.1%. The median duration of responses was 7.45 months, and the median survival time of all patients was 13.2 months. The major toxicities occurring were hematologic toxicity, alopecia, gastrointestinal toxicity and peripheral neuropathy. Hematologic toxicity was severe and was judged to be dose limiting, but clinically manageable. These results indicate that this combination chemotherapy is active against non-small cell lung cancer and deserves further studies.     

Phase II trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel in non-small cell lung cancer patients previously treated with chemotherapy

The purpose of this phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of carboplatin plus paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with chemotherapy. Patients with a performance status (PS) of 0 or 1 who had received one or two previous chemotherapy regimens for advanced NSCLC were eligible. Paclitaxel 200mg/m(2) was infused over 3h and followed by carboplatin (area under the curve 6) infusion over 1h, once every 3 weeks. Thirty patients were enrolled. A complete response was observed in 1 patient and a partial response in 10 patients, for an overall response rate of 36.7%. The median time to progression was 5.3 months. The median survival time was 9.9 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 47%. Hematological toxicity in the form of grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 54%, but grade 3 febrile neutropenia developed in only 3%. Non-hematological grade 3 toxicities were less frequent. There were no treatment-related deaths. The combination of carboplatin plus paclitaxel is an active and well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of NSCLC patients who have previously been treated with chemotherapy and have a good PS.     

Non small cell lung cancer treatment with carboplatin and vindesine: a phase II study.

A phase II trial aiming to verify the effectiveness of a regimen including carboplatin and vindesine was performed. From November 1989 to September 1990, nineteen patients with advanced small cell lung cancer entered this study. Polychemotherapy treatment included: carboplatin 400 mg/sm, on day 1 and vindesine 3 mg/sm, on days 1 and 15, repeated every 4 weeks, as an outpatient regimen. Observed toxicity was mild; myelodepression, and nausea and vomiting were the main adverse events. No objective response was obtained; 14 no changes in the disease and 4 progressions were detected. The low objective response rate observed in this study is strongly influenced by a set of unfavourable prognostic factors. The median overall survival time [32 weeks] is comparable with the results of other studies.     

Vinorelbine, ifosfamide and cisplatin as first-line treatment in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.

To assess, in a multicenter setting, the effectiveness of a combination of vinorelbine, ifosfamide and cisplatin in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, 123 patients (males=116) with a mean age of 60 years (range 27-75) with stage IIIb/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and performance status 相似文献   

Gemcitabine, vinorelbine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial

The purpose of this phase II trial was to investigate the efficacy and safety of a combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine, vinorelbine and cisplatin in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with NSCLC stage IIIB or IV disease received 1000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine and 25 mg/m(2) vinorelbine on days 1 and 8 and 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin on day 2, every 3 weeks. From December 1998 to May 1999, 31 patients (21 stage IV and 10 stage IIIB disease), with a median age of 59 years (range 40-72 years) were enrolled. The overall intent-to-treat response rate was 45% (95% confidence interval (CI): 27-64%) with 2 complete responders (CR) and 12 partial responders (PR), 7 patients had stable disease and 10 progressed. Median survival was 12.8 months (95% CI: 6.5-12.8+ months), median time to progression was 5.1 months (95% CI: 3.5-7.7 months), and the 1-year survival rate was 52.9% (95% CI: 36.7-76.2%). Patients with stage IIIB disease had a significantly longer overall survival than patients with stage IV disease (P=0.05). Transient World Health Organization (WHO) grade IV leucopenia, anaemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 3 (10%), 2 (6%) and 3 (10%) patients, respectively. The predominant non-haematological toxicities were alopecia and nausea/vomiting. 15 patients (48%) had WHO grade II and III alopecia and 14 patients (45%) nausea/vomiting. The combination of gemcitabine, vinorelbine and cisplatin has demonstrated major antitumour efficacy in advanced NSCLC with a manageable toxicity profile.     

A phase II trial of vinorelbine and cisplatin in previously untreated inoperable non--small-cell lung cancer

Weekly vinorelbine injection with cisplatin had been used in treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. We performed a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a new schedule of vinorelbine and cisplatin in patients with previously untreated, inoperable (stage IIIB or stage IV) non-small-cell lung cancer. From April 1996 to May 1997, 52 patients were enrolled for study, and 50 patients were eligible and evaluable for both response and toxicity assessment. Therapy consisted of vinorelbine, 30 mg/m2, intravenously on days 1 and 5 of a 21-day cycle, and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (reduced to 80 mg/m2 after the first seven patients) given on day 1. A total of 211 treatment courses were administered; the median number of cycles administered per patient was 4.5 (range: 1-6), the median dose intensity for vinorelbine was 16.9 mg/m2/week (84.4%), whereas that of cisplatin was 22.8 mg/m2/week (84.7%). Twenty-five patients responded to therapy for an overall response rate of 50%; one patient attained a complete response (2%). The main toxicities were vomiting, myelosuppression, and diarrhea, which included World Health Organization grade 3 or 4 nausea/vomiting (58% patients), anemia (41% patients), neutropenia (12% patients), and diarrhea (14%). The median duration of responses was 9 months. The median time to disease progression was 6.8 months (range 0.4-18.1 months). Median survival was 13 months, and 54% of patients were alive at 1 year. We conclude that this new schedule of vinorelbine and cisplatin achieves a high response with acceptable toxicity profile in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.     

A phase II study with gemcitabine and split-dose cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is among the most active regimens for the treatment of NSCLC. However, the optimal dose and schedule for administration of the two drugs has not yet been determined. We investigated the activity and toxicity of a gemcitabine and split-dose cisplatin regimen in an outpatient setting for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 2004 to May 2005 patients with stage IIIB or IV who had not had prior chemotherapy entered the study. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 and cisplatin 35 mg/m2, both given intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were entered this study. Patient characteristics were as follows: male/female, 34/11; median age (range), 62 (30-76) years; ECOG PS 0/1/2, 7/30/8; stage IIIB/IV, 18/27. A total of 168 cycles were delivered, with a median of 4 cycles (range, 1-6). All patients were evaluable for toxicity. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities according to the NCI toxicity criteria included neutropenia in 8 patients (18%), anemia in 4 (9%), thrombocytopenia in 7 (15%), and emesis in 1 (2%). Of 42 patients assessable for response, 23 patients showed a partial remission. On intent-to-treat basis, the overall response rate was 51% (95% CI, 37-65%). Median time to progression was 6.0 months (range, 1.2-12.0 months) and median overall survival was 13.1 months (range, 1.4-17 months). CONCLUSIONS: This regimen with gemcitabine and split-dose cisplatin using a 21-day schedule appears to be active and very well-tolerated in an outpatients setting for patients with advanced NSCLC.