靶控输注异丙酚复合瑞芬太尼麻醉时NI与BIS监测镇静深度的比较

Objective To compare bispectral index (BIS) with narcotrend index (NI) during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia administered by target-controlled infusion (TCI).Methods Ten ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ pafients aged 18-56 yr weighing 52-67kg undergoing abdominal surgery lasting>1h were included in this study.BIS and NI were monitored simultaneously.Anesthesia was induced with TCI of propofol with target plasma concentration (Cp) of 3～4μg/ml and remifentanil (Cp 3-4ng/ml).Tracheal intubation was facilitated with cis-atracurium 0.3 mg/kg.The patients were mechanically ventilated.PETCO2 was maintained between 30-35 mm Hg.Anesthesia was maintained with TCI of propofol and remifentanil by the anesthesiologist bhnded to BIS and NI values.according to hemedynamic parameters.BIS and narcotrend values were recorded every minute and compared by another anesthesiologist.All data were compared by Bland-Altman analysis and with Kappa coefficient for agreement.The correlation between BIS and NI was tested by Spearman correlation analysis.The number of error ofjudgement (Type Ⅰ was defined as BIS<40 and NI>62;Type Ⅱ was defined as BIS>60 and NI<20)Was counted.Results The correlation and agreement between BIS and NI during maintenance of propofol-remifentanil anesthesia administered by TCI showed good consistency.Conclusion Both NI and BIS Can help anesthesiologist control the depth of anesthesia during TCI of propofol-remifentanil.     

复合TCI异丙酚时瑞芬太尼抑制支撑喉镜诱发心血管反应的EC50

Objective To determine the median effective concentration(EC50) of remifentanil by TCI inhibiting the cardiovascular response to the placement of operating laryngoscope performed under propofol anesthesia administered by TCI.Methods Twenty ASA Ⅰ orⅡ patients,aged 20-51 yr,weighing 52-83 kg,undergoing extirpation of vocal cord polyps under general anesthesia with remifentanil-pmpofol administered by TCI.were enrolled in the study.The target plasma concentration (Cp) of propofol was set at 4μg/ml.Operating laryngoscope was placed at 3 min after tracheal intubation.HR and MAP were continuously monitored.When HR or MAP increased by 15%,the candiovascular response was defined as positive.The EC50 was determined by up-and-down technique.The initial Cp of remifentanil was set at 5 ng/ml and was increased/decreased by 20%in the next patient if the cardiovascular response was positive or negative.Results No chest wall stiffness and intraoperative awareness occurred in all the patients.The EC50 of remifentanil TCI inhibiting the cardiovascular response to the placement of operating laryngoscope was 3.50ng/ml with confidence interval(CI) between 3.47-3.60 ng/ml.Conclusion Thee EC50 of remifentanil TCI inhibiting cardiovascular response to the placement of operating laryngoscope is 3.50ng/ml with CI between 3.47-3.60ng/ml.     

复合TCI异丙酚时瑞芬太尼抑制支撑喉镜诱发心血管反应的EC50

Objective To determine the median effective concentration(EC50) of remifentanil by TCI inhibiting the cardiovascular response to the placement of operating laryngoscope performed under propofol anesthesia administered by TCI.Methods Twenty ASA Ⅰ orⅡ patients,aged 20-51 yr,weighing 52-83 kg,undergoing extirpation of vocal cord polyps under general anesthesia with remifentanil-pmpofol administered by TCI.were enrolled in the study.The target plasma concentration (Cp) of propofol was set at 4μg/ml.Operating laryngoscope was placed at 3 min after tracheal intubation.HR and MAP were continuously monitored.When HR or MAP increased by 15%,the candiovascular response was defined as positive.The EC50 was determined by up-and-down technique.The initial Cp of remifentanil was set at 5 ng/ml and was increased/decreased by 20%in the next patient if the cardiovascular response was positive or negative.Results No chest wall stiffness and intraoperative awareness occurred in all the patients.The EC50 of remifentanil TCI inhibiting the cardiovascular response to the placement of operating laryngoscope was 3.50ng/ml with confidence interval(CI) between 3.47-3.60 ng/ml.Conclusion Thee EC50 of remifentanil TCI inhibiting cardiovascular response to the placement of operating laryngoscope is 3.50ng/ml with CI between 3.47-3.60ng/ml.     

The effect of gynecologic laparoscopy on propofol concentrations administered by the target-controlled infusion system

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of gynecologic laparoscopy on propofol concentrations administered by the target-controlled infusion (TCI) system. Thirteen patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy (intraabdominal pressure of 10 mmHg) were enrolled in this study. Anesthesia was induced with vecuronium 0.1 mg·kg⁻¹ and propofol, then maintained by 60% nitrous oxide and sevoflurane in oxygen and a constant infusion of propofol. Propofol was administered to all subjects by means of a target-controlled infusion to achieve propofol plasma concentration at 6.0 μg·ml⁻¹ at intubation and 2.0 μg·ml⁻¹ after intubation. Before and during laparoscopy, plasma propofol concentration was determined using high-performance liquid chromatograhy. Cardiac output (CO) and effective liver blood flow (LBF) were also measured using indocyanine green as an indicator. Before and during pneumoperitoneum, there were no significant differences in propofol concentations between each point. Propofol concentrations were well achieved to predicted concentrations administered by the TCI system during gynecologic laparoscopy under propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia.     

靶控输注瑞芬太尼和异丙酚麻醉诱导时镇静催眠效应的相互作用

Objective To investigate the sedative and hypnotic interaction between remifentanil and propofol by target-controlled infusion (TCI) during induction of anesthesia.Methods Third-two ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱpatients,aged 22-63 yr,body mass index 18-25 kg/m2,scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia,were randomly divided into 4 groups(n=8 each).Group Ⅰ only received TCI pmpofol.GroupⅡ,Ⅲ,and Ⅳreceived a target concentration of 2,4 or 6 ng/ml remifentanil respectively.While the blood-effect site concentrations of remifentanil were equilibrated,patients received TCI of propefol,with an initial target concentration of 0.5μg/ml.After the blood-effect site concentrations of propofol were equilibrated then with 0.5μg/ml increments until the loss consciousness was achieved.The eyelash reflex and state of consciousness were assessed and radial arterial blood sample 6 ml was taken every 3 min to determine the remifentanil and propofol concentrations in blood.Propofol and remifentanil concentrations in blood were measured by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection respectively.The sedative and hypnotic interaction between propofol and remifentanil was determined with a pharmacodynamie interaction model by regression analysis and determined using the isobolographic method.Results Propofol concentrations in blood were lower in group Ⅱ,Ⅲ and Ⅳ than group Ⅰ(P<0.05).The propofol concentratopms in blood were significantly decreased in trun with the increase in the remifentanil concentrations in blood in group Ⅱ-Ⅳ(P<0.05).At loss of eyelash reflex and loss of consciousness of patients,the pharmacodynamic interaction model by curve fitting was superior to linear regression (P<0.05).At loss of eyelash reflex of patients,the curve fitting result showed EC50,prop=2.77μg/ml and EC50,rem=26.67 ng/ml,and the isobolographic method equation is ECprop/2.77+ECrem/26.67=0.69.At loss of consciousness of patients,the curve fitting result showed EC50,prop==3.76μg/ml and EC50,rem=31.56ng/ml,and the isobolographic method equation is Ecprop/3.76+Ecrem/31.56=0.65.Conclusion Remifentanil (Cp 2-6 ng/ml) and propofol by TCI shows a synergistic type of pharmacodynamic interaction on the sedative and hypnotic during induction of anesthesia.     

靶控输注瑞芬太尼和异丙酚麻醉诱导时镇静催眠效应的相互作用

Objective To investigate the sedative and hypnotic interaction between remifentanil and propofol by target-controlled infusion (TCI) during induction of anesthesia.Methods Third-two ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱpatients,aged 22-63 yr,body mass index 18-25 kg/m2,scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia,were randomly divided into 4 groups(n=8 each).Group Ⅰ only received TCI pmpofol.GroupⅡ,Ⅲ,and Ⅳreceived a target concentration of 2,4 or 6 ng/ml remifentanil respectively.While the blood-effect site concentrations of remifentanil were equilibrated,patients received TCI of propefol,with an initial target concentration of 0.5μg/ml.After the blood-effect site concentrations of propofol were equilibrated then with 0.5μg/ml increments until the loss consciousness was achieved.The eyelash reflex and state of consciousness were assessed and radial arterial blood sample 6 ml was taken every 3 min to determine the remifentanil and propofol concentrations in blood.Propofol and remifentanil concentrations in blood were measured by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection respectively.The sedative and hypnotic interaction between propofol and remifentanil was determined with a pharmacodynamie interaction model by regression analysis and determined using the isobolographic method.Results Propofol concentrations in blood were lower in group Ⅱ,Ⅲ and Ⅳ than group Ⅰ(P<0.05).The propofol concentratopms in blood were significantly decreased in trun with the increase in the remifentanil concentrations in blood in group Ⅱ-Ⅳ(P<0.05).At loss of eyelash reflex and loss of consciousness of patients,the pharmacodynamic interaction model by curve fitting was superior to linear regression (P<0.05).At loss of eyelash reflex of patients,the curve fitting result showed EC50,prop=2.77μg/ml and EC50,rem=26.67 ng/ml,and the isobolographic method equation is ECprop/2.77+ECrem/26.67=0.69.At loss of consciousness of patients,the curve fitting result showed EC50,prop==3.76μg/ml and EC50,rem=31.56ng/ml,and the isobolographic method equation is Ecprop/3.76+Ecrem/31.56=0.65.Conclusion Remifentanil (Cp 2-6 ng/ml) and propofol by TCI shows a synergistic type of pharmacodynamic interaction on the sedative and hypnotic during induction of anesthesia.     

七氟醚和异丙酚复合麻醉下妇科腹腔镜手术患者脑血流量和颅内压的比较

Objective To compare the cerebral blood flow (CBF) and intracranial pressure (ICP) during laparoscopic gynecologic surgery performed under propofol and sevoflurane combined anesthesia.Methods Forty ASAⅠ orⅡ patients aged 20-59 yr weighing 44-69 kg were randomly divided into 2 groups(n=20 each):propofol group (group P) and sevoflurane group (group S).Anesthesia was induced with TCI of propofol (Ce 4μg/ml) in group P or 8% sevoflurane in group S combined with TCI of remifentanil (Ce 6 ng/ml).Tracheal intubation was facilitated with cis-atracurium 0.15 mg/kg.The patients were mechanically ventilated.PETCO2 was maintained at 35-40 mm Hg.Anesthesia was maintained with TCI of propofol or sevoflurane.inhalation combined with TCI of remifentanil.BIS value was maintained at 45-50 by adjusting Ce of propofol or concentration of sevoflurane.Intraabdominal pressure (IAP) was maintained at 12-14 mm Hg.Transcranial Doppler monitoring wag used.Cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) and pulsatility index (PI) were recorded at 5 min after supine position(T1)and 5 min after supine lithotomy position before induction(T2),while tracheal tube was being inserted(T3),5 min after tracheal intubation(T4),immediately and 15 min after abdominal CO2 iusnfflation in trendelenburglithotomy position (T5,T6) and at 10 min after deflation of abdomen(T7).Results CBFV was significandy decreased at T3,T4 and T7 in group P and at T4 and T7 in group S as compared with the baseline at T1.CBFV at T3 was significantly lower in group P than in group S.PI at T3,T4 was significantly decreased in group P as compared with the baseline at T1 and was significantly lower than in group S.PI at T5,6 was significantly increased as compared with the baseline in both groups but was not significantly different between the 2 groups.Conclusion When combined with remifentanil.propofol could decrease CBF and ICP while sevoflurane has no significant effect on CBF and ICP after induction.CBF and ICP are significantly increased in both groups after abdominal CO2 insufflation.     

七氟醚和异丙酚复合麻醉下妇科腹腔镜手术患者脑血流量和颅内压的比较

Objective To compare the cerebral blood flow (CBF) and intracranial pressure (ICP) during laparoscopic gynecologic surgery performed under propofol and sevoflurane combined anesthesia.Methods Forty ASAⅠ orⅡ patients aged 20-59 yr weighing 44-69 kg were randomly divided into 2 groups(n=20 each):propofol group (group P) and sevoflurane group (group S).Anesthesia was induced with TCI of propofol (Ce 4μg/ml) in group P or 8% sevoflurane in group S combined with TCI of remifentanil (Ce 6 ng/ml).Tracheal intubation was facilitated with cis-atracurium 0.15 mg/kg.The patients were mechanically ventilated.PETCO2 was maintained at 35-40 mm Hg.Anesthesia was maintained with TCI of propofol or sevoflurane.inhalation combined with TCI of remifentanil.BIS value was maintained at 45-50 by adjusting Ce of propofol or concentration of sevoflurane.Intraabdominal pressure (IAP) was maintained at 12-14 mm Hg.Transcranial Doppler monitoring wag used.Cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) and pulsatility index (PI) were recorded at 5 min after supine position(T1)and 5 min after supine lithotomy position before induction(T2),while tracheal tube was being inserted(T3),5 min after tracheal intubation(T4),immediately and 15 min after abdominal CO2 iusnfflation in trendelenburglithotomy position (T5,T6) and at 10 min after deflation of abdomen(T7).Results CBFV was significandy decreased at T3,T4 and T7 in group P and at T4 and T7 in group S as compared with the baseline at T1.CBFV at T3 was significantly lower in group P than in group S.PI at T3,T4 was significantly decreased in group P as compared with the baseline at T1 and was significantly lower than in group S.PI at T5,6 was significantly increased as compared with the baseline in both groups but was not significantly different between the 2 groups.Conclusion When combined with remifentanil.propofol could decrease CBF and ICP while sevoflurane has no significant effect on CBF and ICP after induction.CBF and ICP are significantly increased in both groups after abdominal CO2 insufflation.     

Target-controlled Infusion of Propofol and Remifentanil for a patient with Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Objective. The choice of anesthesia, monitors, and anesthetic care for ablation of atrial fibrillation （AF） has not been described clearly. This case report is to present an anesthesia technique for ablation of AF and to evaluate its efficacy and safety of the anesthetics used. Methods. This was a case report of a 50-year old female patient who was performed radiofrequency catheter ablation of AF. Surgery was carried out under the total intravenous anesthesia （TIA） with a laryngeal mask airway （LMA） insertion, which was performed by target-controlled infusion （TCI） of propofol and remifentanil. Under the procedure of anesthesia, standard monitored measures were performed to ensure her safety. Results. Surgery was carried out successfully under the TIA with TCI of propofol and remifentanil. The anesthesia induction was fast and comfortable, smooth, recovery quickly after anesthesia, which did not cause any severe complication. Conclusion, TCI of propofol and remifentanil could provide the satisfactory efficacy and safety during ablation of AF.     

卵巢周期对患者异丙酚镇静效应的影响

目的 评价卵巢周期对患者异丙酚镇静效应的影响.方法 择期拟行妇科腹腔镜手术患者加例,ASA分级Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,年龄20.加岁,体重指数20～25 kg/m2,根据孕酮水平分为卵泡期组(F组,血清孕酮浓度0.31～1.52 ng/ml)和黄体期组(L组,血清孕酮浓度5.16～18.56 ng/ml),每组20例.麻醉诱导时靶控输注异丙酚,初始血浆靶浓度2 μg/ml,达到预期血浆靶浓度后每隔30 s递增0.5μg/ml直至患者意识消失及BIS值降至50.记录患者意识消失时的BIS值、异丙酚血浆靶浓度,记录BIS值降至50时的异丙酚血浆靶浓度.结果 与L组比较,F组意识消失时和BIS值降至50时的异丙酚血浆靶浓度升高(P＜0.05或0.01),意识消失时的BIS值差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 卵巢周期可影响异丙酚的镇静效应,表现为卵泡期的镇静效应低于黄体期.

Abstract：

Objective To investigate the effect of ovarian cycle on the sedative effect of propofol in patients. Methods Forty ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients, aged 20-40 yr, with body mass index 20-25 kg/m2 , scheduled for elective gynecologic laparoscopic surgery, were divided into 2 groups according to the progesterone level ( n = 20 each): follicular phase group (group F, serum progesterone concentration 0.31-1.52 ng/ml) and luteal phase group (group L, serum progesterone concentration 5.16-18.56 ng/ml). Anesthesia was induced with target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol and iv injection of fentanyl and cisatracurium. The initial target plasma concentration (Cp) of propofol was set at 2 μg/ml, after the Cp reached the predetermined level, the Cp increased by 0.5 μg/ml every 30 s until the patients lost consciousness and BIS value was decreased to 50. The BIS value and Cp of propofol was recorded when the patients lost consciousness. The Cp of propofol was also recorded when BIS value was decreased to 50. The patients were tracheal intubated and mechanically ventilated. Anesthesia was maintained with TCI of propofol combined with remifentanil. BIS value was maintained at 45-55 by adjusting the Cp of propofol. Results The Cps of propofol were significantly higher when the patients lost consciousness and when BIS value was decreased to 50 in group F than in group L ( P ＜ 0.05 or 0.01) . There was no significant difference in BIS value when the patients lost consciousness between the two groups (P ＞ 0.05). Conclusion Ovarian cycle can affect the sedative effect of propofol in patients, which shows that the sedative effect during the follicular phase is lower than that during the luteal phase.