葡萄糖激酶基因E339K突变的功能学研究

Objective To explore the molecular mechanisms of glucokinase (GCK) E339K mutation resulting in maturity-onset diabetes of the young-2 (MODY2).Methods Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) overload 2 h glucose (2hPG), glycosylated hemoglobin Alc (HbAlc) and fasting insulin (FIns) level were measured, respectively.Mutant glutathione S-transferase (GST)-GCK-cDNA was constructed with site-directed mutagenesis.Wild type and mutant GCK protein expressed in E.Coli were purified with affinity chromatography.Enzymatic kinetics and thermal stability were tested with enzyme-coupled analysis.Results Compared with non-mutants, mutants had higher FPG [(6.92 ± 0.95) mmol/L vs (4.70 ± 0.35) mmol/L, P＜0.001], 2hPG [(9.00 ± 1.49 ) mmol/L vs (5.51 ± 0.86) mmol/L,P＜0.001],HbAlc[(6.46 ± 0.69)% vs(4.83 ± 0.30)%,P＜0.01],and lower FIns level [(6.15 ± 1.97 ) mIU/L vs ( 10.79 ± 4.93 ) mIU/L, P ＜ 0.01], HOMA-β (34.16 ±3.62 vs 172.53 ± 76.58, P ＜ 0.001 ).This mutation induced lower protein yield [( 12.7 ±1.72) mg/L vs ( 16.2 ± 2.65 ) mg/L, P ＜ 0.01], lower appetency for glucose [S0.5: ( 13.96 ± 1.89)mmol/L vs (5.92±0.99)mmol/L, P＜0.001] and ATP [Km:(3.27 ±1.14) mmol/L vs (0.30±0.09)mmol/L, P＜0.001], lower catalytic ability [Kcat:(1.62 ±0.35)/s vs (25.18 ±2.10)/s, P＜0.001].It also showed protein thermal instability.Conclusion Glucokinase gene E339K mutation promotes the development of MODY2 by affecting protein yield and protein stability as well as the enzymatic kinetics of GCK.     

大剂量阿托伐他汀预防对比剂肾病

Objective To compare the efficacy of high and low dose atorvastatin on preventing contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients underwent diagnostic and therapeutic coronary intervention. Methods All patients received atorvastatin 10 mg/d on the basis of hydrated therapy (n =100) and high dose group received additional atorvastatin 80 nag at 12 to 24 hours before procedure (n =50). Scr, Ccr, blood β2-M, urine NAG/Cr, and urine osmolality before and after the procedure were compared between the groups. Results Baseline demographic characteristics and nephropathy risk factors were similar between groups. Cer was significantly reduced while blood β2-M and uric NAG/Cr were significantly increased in low dose group (all P ＜ 0.05) . Blood β2-M in the high dose group was significantly lower than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(2.35±0.52) mg/L vs. (2.67±0.64) mg/L, P =0.008], day 3[(2.49±0.55)mg/L vs. (2.80±0.64) mg/L,P =0.011] and day 5[(2.29±0.53) mg/L vs. (2.56±0.66) nag/L, P = 0.026] post-procedure respectively; urine NAG/Cr in the high dose group was also significantly lower than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(1.19±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.46±0.34) U/mmol, P ＜ 0.001], day 3 [(1.30±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.59±0.33) U/mmol, P ＜ 0.001], and day 5 [(1.10±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.34±0.35) U/mmol, P = 0.001] post-procedure respectively;Cer in the high dose group was significantly higher than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(73.69±20.99) mL/min vs. (65.19±18.72) mL/min,P =0.035], day 3[(64.04±15.82) ml/min vs. (56.79±14.50)ml/min,P =0.019] post-procedure respectively. Conclusion High dose atorvastatin use before angiography is superior than low dose atorvastatin on attenuating contrast induced renal dysfunction.     

大剂量阿托伐他汀预防对比剂肾病

Objective To compare the efficacy of high and low dose atorvastatin on preventing contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients underwent diagnostic and therapeutic coronary intervention. Methods All patients received atorvastatin 10 mg/d on the basis of hydrated therapy (n =100) and high dose group received additional atorvastatin 80 nag at 12 to 24 hours before procedure (n =50). Scr, Ccr, blood β2-M, urine NAG/Cr, and urine osmolality before and after the procedure were compared between the groups. Results Baseline demographic characteristics and nephropathy risk factors were similar between groups. Cer was significantly reduced while blood β2-M and uric NAG/Cr were significantly increased in low dose group (all P ＜ 0.05) . Blood β2-M in the high dose group was significantly lower than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(2.35±0.52) mg/L vs. (2.67±0.64) mg/L, P =0.008], day 3[(2.49±0.55)mg/L vs. (2.80±0.64) mg/L,P =0.011] and day 5[(2.29±0.53) mg/L vs. (2.56±0.66) nag/L, P = 0.026] post-procedure respectively; urine NAG/Cr in the high dose group was also significantly lower than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(1.19±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.46±0.34) U/mmol, P ＜ 0.001], day 3 [(1.30±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.59±0.33) U/mmol, P ＜ 0.001], and day 5 [(1.10±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.34±0.35) U/mmol, P = 0.001] post-procedure respectively;Cer in the high dose group was significantly higher than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(73.69±20.99) mL/min vs. (65.19±18.72) mL/min,P =0.035], day 3[(64.04±15.82) ml/min vs. (56.79±14.50)ml/min,P =0.019] post-procedure respectively. Conclusion High dose atorvastatin use before angiography is superior than low dose atorvastatin on attenuating contrast induced renal dysfunction.     

大剂量阿托伐他汀预防对比剂肾病

Objective To compare the efficacy of high and low dose atorvastatin on preventing contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients underwent diagnostic and therapeutic coronary intervention. Methods All patients received atorvastatin 10 mg/d on the basis of hydrated therapy (n =100) and high dose group received additional atorvastatin 80 nag at 12 to 24 hours before procedure (n =50). Scr, Ccr, blood β2-M, urine NAG/Cr, and urine osmolality before and after the procedure were compared between the groups. Results Baseline demographic characteristics and nephropathy risk factors were similar between groups. Cer was significantly reduced while blood β2-M and uric NAG/Cr were significantly increased in low dose group (all P ＜ 0.05) . Blood β2-M in the high dose group was significantly lower than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(2.35±0.52) mg/L vs. (2.67±0.64) mg/L, P =0.008], day 3[(2.49±0.55)mg/L vs. (2.80±0.64) mg/L,P =0.011] and day 5[(2.29±0.53) mg/L vs. (2.56±0.66) nag/L, P = 0.026] post-procedure respectively; urine NAG/Cr in the high dose group was also significantly lower than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(1.19±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.46±0.34) U/mmol, P ＜ 0.001], day 3 [(1.30±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.59±0.33) U/mmol, P ＜ 0.001], and day 5 [(1.10±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.34±0.35) U/mmol, P = 0.001] post-procedure respectively;Cer in the high dose group was significantly higher than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(73.69±20.99) mL/min vs. (65.19±18.72) mL/min,P =0.035], day 3[(64.04±15.82) ml/min vs. (56.79±14.50)ml/min,P =0.019] post-procedure respectively. Conclusion High dose atorvastatin use before angiography is superior than low dose atorvastatin on attenuating contrast induced renal dysfunction.     

大剂量阿托伐他汀预防对比剂肾病

Objective To compare the efficacy of high and low dose atorvastatin on preventing contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients underwent diagnostic and therapeutic coronary intervention. Methods All patients received atorvastatin 10 mg/d on the basis of hydrated therapy (n =100) and high dose group received additional atorvastatin 80 nag at 12 to 24 hours before procedure (n =50). Scr, Ccr, blood β2-M, urine NAG/Cr, and urine osmolality before and after the procedure were compared between the groups. Results Baseline demographic characteristics and nephropathy risk factors were similar between groups. Cer was significantly reduced while blood β2-M and uric NAG/Cr were significantly increased in low dose group (all P ＜ 0.05) . Blood β2-M in the high dose group was significantly lower than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(2.35±0.52) mg/L vs. (2.67±0.64) mg/L, P =0.008], day 3[(2.49±0.55)mg/L vs. (2.80±0.64) mg/L,P =0.011] and day 5[(2.29±0.53) mg/L vs. (2.56±0.66) nag/L, P = 0.026] post-procedure respectively; urine NAG/Cr in the high dose group was also significantly lower than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(1.19±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.46±0.34) U/mmol, P ＜ 0.001], day 3 [(1.30±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.59±0.33) U/mmol, P ＜ 0.001], and day 5 [(1.10±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.34±0.35) U/mmol, P = 0.001] post-procedure respectively;Cer in the high dose group was significantly higher than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(73.69±20.99) mL/min vs. (65.19±18.72) mL/min,P =0.035], day 3[(64.04±15.82) ml/min vs. (56.79±14.50)ml/min,P =0.019] post-procedure respectively. Conclusion High dose atorvastatin use before angiography is superior than low dose atorvastatin on attenuating contrast induced renal dysfunction.     

大剂量阿托伐他汀预防对比剂肾病

Objective To compare the efficacy of high and low dose atorvastatin on preventing contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients underwent diagnostic and therapeutic coronary intervention. Methods All patients received atorvastatin 10 mg/d on the basis of hydrated therapy (n =100) and high dose group received additional atorvastatin 80 nag at 12 to 24 hours before procedure (n =50). Scr, Ccr, blood β2-M, urine NAG/Cr, and urine osmolality before and after the procedure were compared between the groups. Results Baseline demographic characteristics and nephropathy risk factors were similar between groups. Cer was significantly reduced while blood β2-M and uric NAG/Cr were significantly increased in low dose group (all P ＜ 0.05) . Blood β2-M in the high dose group was significantly lower than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(2.35±0.52) mg/L vs. (2.67±0.64) mg/L, P =0.008], day 3[(2.49±0.55)mg/L vs. (2.80±0.64) mg/L,P =0.011] and day 5[(2.29±0.53) mg/L vs. (2.56±0.66) nag/L, P = 0.026] post-procedure respectively; urine NAG/Cr in the high dose group was also significantly lower than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(1.19±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.46±0.34) U/mmol, P ＜ 0.001], day 3 [(1.30±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.59±0.33) U/mmol, P ＜ 0.001], and day 5 [(1.10±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.34±0.35) U/mmol, P = 0.001] post-procedure respectively;Cer in the high dose group was significantly higher than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(73.69±20.99) mL/min vs. (65.19±18.72) mL/min,P =0.035], day 3[(64.04±15.82) ml/min vs. (56.79±14.50)ml/min,P =0.019] post-procedure respectively. Conclusion High dose atorvastatin use before angiography is superior than low dose atorvastatin on attenuating contrast induced renal dysfunction.     

大剂量阿托伐他汀预防对比剂肾病

Objective To compare the efficacy of high and low dose atorvastatin on preventing contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients underwent diagnostic and therapeutic coronary intervention. Methods All patients received atorvastatin 10 mg/d on the basis of hydrated therapy (n =100) and high dose group received additional atorvastatin 80 nag at 12 to 24 hours before procedure (n =50). Scr, Ccr, blood β2-M, urine NAG/Cr, and urine osmolality before and after the procedure were compared between the groups. Results Baseline demographic characteristics and nephropathy risk factors were similar between groups. Cer was significantly reduced while blood β2-M and uric NAG/Cr were significantly increased in low dose group (all P ＜ 0.05) . Blood β2-M in the high dose group was significantly lower than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(2.35±0.52) mg/L vs. (2.67±0.64) mg/L, P =0.008], day 3[(2.49±0.55)mg/L vs. (2.80±0.64) mg/L,P =0.011] and day 5[(2.29±0.53) mg/L vs. (2.56±0.66) nag/L, P = 0.026] post-procedure respectively; urine NAG/Cr in the high dose group was also significantly lower than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(1.19±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.46±0.34) U/mmol, P ＜ 0.001], day 3 [(1.30±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.59±0.33) U/mmol, P ＜ 0.001], and day 5 [(1.10±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.34±0.35) U/mmol, P = 0.001] post-procedure respectively;Cer in the high dose group was significantly higher than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(73.69±20.99) mL/min vs. (65.19±18.72) mL/min,P =0.035], day 3[(64.04±15.82) ml/min vs. (56.79±14.50)ml/min,P =0.019] post-procedure respectively. Conclusion High dose atorvastatin use before angiography is superior than low dose atorvastatin on attenuating contrast induced renal dysfunction.     

大剂量阿托伐他汀预防对比剂肾病

Objective To compare the efficacy of high and low dose atorvastatin on preventing contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients underwent diagnostic and therapeutic coronary intervention. Methods All patients received atorvastatin 10 mg/d on the basis of hydrated therapy (n =100) and high dose group received additional atorvastatin 80 nag at 12 to 24 hours before procedure (n =50). Scr, Ccr, blood β2-M, urine NAG/Cr, and urine osmolality before and after the procedure were compared between the groups. Results Baseline demographic characteristics and nephropathy risk factors were similar between groups. Cer was significantly reduced while blood β2-M and uric NAG/Cr were significantly increased in low dose group (all P ＜ 0.05) . Blood β2-M in the high dose group was significantly lower than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(2.35±0.52) mg/L vs. (2.67±0.64) mg/L, P =0.008], day 3[(2.49±0.55)mg/L vs. (2.80±0.64) mg/L,P =0.011] and day 5[(2.29±0.53) mg/L vs. (2.56±0.66) nag/L, P = 0.026] post-procedure respectively; urine NAG/Cr in the high dose group was also significantly lower than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(1.19±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.46±0.34) U/mmol, P ＜ 0.001], day 3 [(1.30±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.59±0.33) U/mmol, P ＜ 0.001], and day 5 [(1.10±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.34±0.35) U/mmol, P = 0.001] post-procedure respectively;Cer in the high dose group was significantly higher than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(73.69±20.99) mL/min vs. (65.19±18.72) mL/min,P =0.035], day 3[(64.04±15.82) ml/min vs. (56.79±14.50)ml/min,P =0.019] post-procedure respectively. Conclusion High dose atorvastatin use before angiography is superior than low dose atorvastatin on attenuating contrast induced renal dysfunction.     

大剂量阿托伐他汀预防对比剂肾病

Objective To compare the efficacy of high and low dose atorvastatin on preventing contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients underwent diagnostic and therapeutic coronary intervention. Methods All patients received atorvastatin 10 mg/d on the basis of hydrated therapy (n =100) and high dose group received additional atorvastatin 80 nag at 12 to 24 hours before procedure (n =50). Scr, Ccr, blood β2-M, urine NAG/Cr, and urine osmolality before and after the procedure were compared between the groups. Results Baseline demographic characteristics and nephropathy risk factors were similar between groups. Cer was significantly reduced while blood β2-M and uric NAG/Cr were significantly increased in low dose group (all P ＜ 0.05) . Blood β2-M in the high dose group was significantly lower than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(2.35±0.52) mg/L vs. (2.67±0.64) mg/L, P =0.008], day 3[(2.49±0.55)mg/L vs. (2.80±0.64) mg/L,P =0.011] and day 5[(2.29±0.53) mg/L vs. (2.56±0.66) nag/L, P = 0.026] post-procedure respectively; urine NAG/Cr in the high dose group was also significantly lower than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(1.19±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.46±0.34) U/mmol, P ＜ 0.001], day 3 [(1.30±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.59±0.33) U/mmol, P ＜ 0.001], and day 5 [(1.10±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.34±0.35) U/mmol, P = 0.001] post-procedure respectively;Cer in the high dose group was significantly higher than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(73.69±20.99) mL/min vs. (65.19±18.72) mL/min,P =0.035], day 3[(64.04±15.82) ml/min vs. (56.79±14.50)ml/min,P =0.019] post-procedure respectively. Conclusion High dose atorvastatin use before angiography is superior than low dose atorvastatin on attenuating contrast induced renal dysfunction.     

大剂量阿托伐他汀预防对比剂肾病

Objective To compare the efficacy of high and low dose atorvastatin on preventing contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients underwent diagnostic and therapeutic coronary intervention. Methods All patients received atorvastatin 10 mg/d on the basis of hydrated therapy (n =100) and high dose group received additional atorvastatin 80 nag at 12 to 24 hours before procedure (n =50). Scr, Ccr, blood β2-M, urine NAG/Cr, and urine osmolality before and after the procedure were compared between the groups. Results Baseline demographic characteristics and nephropathy risk factors were similar between groups. Cer was significantly reduced while blood β2-M and uric NAG/Cr were significantly increased in low dose group (all P ＜ 0.05) . Blood β2-M in the high dose group was significantly lower than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(2.35±0.52) mg/L vs. (2.67±0.64) mg/L, P =0.008], day 3[(2.49±0.55)mg/L vs. (2.80±0.64) mg/L,P =0.011] and day 5[(2.29±0.53) mg/L vs. (2.56±0.66) nag/L, P = 0.026] post-procedure respectively; urine NAG/Cr in the high dose group was also significantly lower than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(1.19±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.46±0.34) U/mmol, P ＜ 0.001], day 3 [(1.30±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.59±0.33) U/mmol, P ＜ 0.001], and day 5 [(1.10±0.30) U/mmol vs. (1.34±0.35) U/mmol, P = 0.001] post-procedure respectively;Cer in the high dose group was significantly higher than that in the low dose group at day 1 [(73.69±20.99) mL/min vs. (65.19±18.72) mL/min,P =0.035], day 3[(64.04±15.82) ml/min vs. (56.79±14.50)ml/min,P =0.019] post-procedure respectively. Conclusion High dose atorvastatin use before angiography is superior than low dose atorvastatin on attenuating contrast induced renal dysfunction.