A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-supported overdentures and conventional dentures in diabetic patients. Part IV: Comparisons of dietary intake

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: It is unclear whether the replacement of conventional mandibular dentures with implant-supported overdentures alters the diet and thus improves the nutritional intake of edentulous persons. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the pretreatment and posttreatment diets of edentulous diabetic patients who received new dentures with either a conventional complete mandibular denture (CD) or a mandibular implant-supported overdenture (IOD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: New dentures were made for 89 edentulous diabetic patients with acceptable metabolic control without insulin (NIT) or with insulin (IT). A randomized approach was used to assign 37 patients a mandibular CD and 52 patients a mandibular IOD supported by 2 cylindrical implants. Of the 89 patients, 58 submitted a dietary log for 7 consecutive days before treatment (PT) and 6 months after treatment completion (PTC). An average daily intake of 28 essential nutrients was determined for each patient at each time interval. Separate 2 x 2 x 2 repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were performed for each nutrient to compare the means of the 2 denture groups (CD and IOD), 2 diabetic groups (NIT and IT), and 2 time intervals (PT and PTC). The intakes were also compared with the recommended daily allowance (RDA). RESULTS: ANOVAs for all 28 nutritional variables showed no main effect for either denture type or diabetic treatment. Time effects were seen for magnesium, potassium, copper, and monounsaturated fats. The PTC mean intake of the total sample (N = 58) decreased for all 3 minerals and increased for monounsaturated fats with study dentures. Post hoc tests showed the differences between PT and PTC means to be statistically significant for only magnesium (P=.043) and potassium (P=.015). The percentage of patients with PT intake 25% or more below the RDA ranged from 33% to 85% in the CD group and from 24% to 100% in the IOD group for the same 11 nutrients. PTC fiber intake deficiency was noted in almost all participants. Carbohydrate consumption was markedly lower than that recommended by the American Diabetic Association. CONCLUSION: As is often the case with elderly groups, this group of edentulous diabetic patients showed highly comprised nutritional intakes of fiber, vitamins, and minerals. The replacement of old dentures with new dentures that included either a mandibular CD or IOD did not alter patient diets such that the patients improved their nutritional intakes of essential micronutrients and macronutrients.     

A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-supported overdentures and conventional dentures in diabetic patients. Part V: food preference comparisons.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The functional benefits of replacing old dentures with new conventional mandibular dentures or implant-supported overdentures has not been fully determined. PURPOSE: This study assessed the impact of these 2 types of replacement dentures on the food choices of diabetic patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 68 diabetic patients with original complete dentures participated in this study. Diabetes was controlled with insulin in 38 patients (IT) and without insulin in 30 patients (NIT). All subjects received conventional maxillary dentures; 25 received mandibular conventional dentures (CD), and 43 received overdentures with plastic clips and a Hader bar attached to 2 osseointegrated implants (IOD). Subjects rated their perceptions of taste acceptability, texture acceptability, and chewing ease on a 4-point nominal scale and eating frequency on a 5-point scale for 13 specific foods at baseline (with original dentures) and at 6 months post-treatment completion (PTC). Fisher exact tests were used to compare the change in percentage distributions of responses with treatment. A 2 x 2 x 2 repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare mean scores between the 2 denture groups, 2 diabetic groups, and 2 time intervals for each of the 13 foods and 4 questions related to food acceptability. RESULTS: At baseline, no significant differences were found between the frequency distributions of responses in the CD and IOD groups or the IT and NIT groups for all 52 comparisons. With both types of study dentures, a higher percentage of patients perceived deterioration rather than improvement in function. When percentage distributions based on actual positive or negative change (treatment effect) in patient responses were compared, significant differences were found for 3 of the 52 responses, in favor of the IOD group. ANOVA demonstrated significant mean differences for 4 of the 52 comparisons. CONCLUSION: Both types of study dentures resulted in declines in the perceived taste and texture acceptability of almost all test foods. Declines in perceived chewing ease and eating frequency were more common and greater in the CD than in the IOD group. Both types of study dentures failed to affect food choices, as evidenced by declines or limited improvement in the perceived frequency with which most foods were eaten.     

Randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-supported overdentures and conventional dentures in diabetic patients. Part III: comparisons of patient satisfaction.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: There is insufficient evidence to indicate the functional superiority of mandibular implant-supported overdentures to justify their use in edentulous patients. PURPOSE: This study compared the benefits perceived by patients who received a new maxillary denture and a mandibular conventional denture (CD) and an implant-supported overdenture (IOD). METHOD: New maxillary and mandibular dentures were delivered to 89 diabetic denture wearers with clinically acceptable metabolic control who treated their diabetes either with insulin (IT) or without insulin (NIT). Of the 89 patients, 37 received maxillary and mandibular CDs and 52 received a maxillary CD and an IOD. Two questionnaires with categorical responses were used; the first contained 13 questions to ascertain a patient's absolute assessments of original dentures at entry and study dentures at 6- and 24-months after treatment completion; the second questionnaire had 11 questions that assessed the relative change perceived by patients with study dentures. Of the 78 patients who completed the posttreatment (PT) assessments at 6 months, 68 patients provided longitudinal data for questionnaire I and cross-sectional data for questionnaire II. In addition, 46 patients (18 CD and 28 IOD) also provided PT assessments at 24 months. RESULTS: Both mean scores and percentage distributions of longitudinal data for questionnaire I showed perceptual improvements with both types of study dentures. Improvements were higher in the IOD than in the CD group. Mean scores failed to show any significant differences between the 2 treatment groups. The only significant difference was found in the change in percentage distributions for perceptual chewing ability in favor of the IOD group. Even this advantage was lost at 24 months. With the comparative questionnaire, a higher percentage of patients in the IOD group than in the CD group perceived improvements with study dentures from their original dentures in chewing ability, chewing comfort, and denture security. However, mean differences were statistically significant in favor of the IOD group only for chewing ability and less difficulty to chew hard foods. CONCLUSION: The mandibular implant-supported overdenture offers same advantage in terms of perceived chewing function over the conventional denture.     

Comparisons of chewing difficulty of consumed foods with mandibular conventional dentures and implant-supported overdentures in diabetic denture wearers

PURPOSE: This study compared the chewing difficulty of foods in diets of denture wearers with mandibular conventional and implant-supported overdentures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-week dietary logs were evaluated for 58 subjects with controlled diabetes at baseline with their original dentures and with new dentures 6 months after treatment completion. Subjects received new maxillary and mandibular complete dentures, 21 with mandibular conventional dentures and 37 with implant-supported overdentures. A 10-point chewing difficulty rating scale (10 for most difficult-to-chew foods) was used to rate food items in the dietary logs. RESULTS: ANOVA showed no differences between the chewing difficulty mean scores for all foods consumed either at baseline or posttreatment for the two groups. However, the mean scores for the combined consumption frequency of difficult-to-chew foods (6 to 10) showed a significant decrease following treatment with both types of dentures. This decline did not differ significantly between the denture types. With original dentures, more than 91% of subjects consumed foods with chewing difficulty scores of 6 to 10 at least seven times per week. With study dentures, only 21% maintained this level of consumption, with the frequency decreasing to four to six times per week in 24% and one to three times per week in 43% of subjects. The declines in consumption frequency of more difficult to chew foods with study dentures were in a higher percentage of subjects in the implant than in the conventional group. CONCLUSION: After 7 months of adaptation to new dentures, patients consumed fewer difficult-to-chew foods than with their original dentures. This decline was more frequent with mandibular implant-supported overdentures than with conventional dentures. Dietary counseling should be considered as part of implant and complete denture therapy.     

The masticatory efficiency of mandibular implant-supported overdentures as compared with tooth-supported overdentures and complete dentures

This study assesses the comparative masticatory efficiency (CME) of mandibular implant-supported overdentures (ISOs) to tooth-supported overdentures (TSOs) and complete dentures (CDs). Three groups of patients in equal numbers were evaluated by assessing chewing efficiency, and the results were correlated with tracings of mandibular excursion (ME) and electromyographic (EMG) computerized analysis. CME was measured by utilizing standardized portions of 2 food staples with fixed masticatory sequencing. In a following session, utilizing the same fixed masticatory sequence, tracings of ME and EMG of the masseter and temporal muscles were recorded and analyzed. The results revealed that the ISO provided the greatest degree of efficiency, followed by the TSO and then the CD group. CME is more correlated to ME and less correlated to EMG.     

Association between personality traits and quality of life in patients treated with conventional mandibular dentures or implant-supported overdentures

Studies investigating the relationship between personality traits and quality of life related to the types of dental prostheses are scarce. The aim of the present study was to assess personality traits and their impact on quality of life for individuals treated with either conventional mandibular dentures (CMD) or implant-supported overdentures. Fifty patients with CMD and 50 patients with implant-supported mandibular overdentures (IMOD) were recruited. Individuals were examined; clinical and demographic data of interest were collected. All participants agreed to answer two questionnaires: the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), which assessed quality of life related to oral health, and the Neuroticism Extraversion Openness Five-Factors Inventory (NEO FFI-R), which evaluated five personality domains. The influence of variables of interest on oral health-related quality of life was tested by univariate analysis and multiple linear regression. Patients with CMD reported higher levels of impact on quality of life (OHIP-14=10·30 ± 5·88) when compared to patients with IMOD (OHIP-14=6·52 ± 5·91; P=0·002). Multivariate predictive regression model for quality of life included neuroticism, conscientiousness and gender for the conventional mandibular denture group (P<0·05; R(2)=36·59%), whereas neuroticism, openness and schooling (P<0·05; R(2)=21·09%) were included in the implant-supported mandibular denture group model. Patients with IMOD had less impact on quality of life than patients with CMD. Personality traits, mainly neuroticism, had a significant influence on oral health-related quality of life linked to a chosen modality of prosthetic therapy.     

Effect of mandibular ridge height on masticatory performance with mandibular conventional and implant-assisted overdentures

PURPOSE: This study assessed the impact of mandibular bone height on masticatory performance following treatment with a mandibular conventional denture (CD) or implant-retained overdenture (IOD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Evaluation of masticatory performance in 63 participants was made with original CDs and 6 months after treatment completion with new dentures; 25 patients received a mandibular CD and 38 received a mandibular IOD. Anterior ridge height at the mandibular symphysis was determined on lateral cephalograms to provide subgroups of low (< or = 21 mm), moderate (> 21 mm, < 28 mm), and high (> or = 28 mm) ridge height for both CDs and IODs. Masticatory performance tests on the preferred chewing side (PS) and swallowing threshold tests were made with peanuts and carrots. RESULTS: Analysis of variance was used for comparisons of mean change in performance after treatment with study dentures for the 3 bone height groups; this indicated significant differences between the CD and IOD for PS masticatory performance with peanuts (P = .05) and carrots (P = .03). Post hoc tests found significant mean differences between the CDs and IODs with peanuts (P = .008) and carrots (P = .01) only in the low bone height group. Although no significant differences were found in swallowing threshold performance, the mean change scores for subjects with low bone height were greater with the IODs than those with CD for swallowing threshold performance, strokes, and time. DISCUSSION: It is suggested that only in patients with advanced ridge resorption is the mandibular IOD more likely than a CD to result in improvements in masticatory performance. CONCLUSION: The study indicated that treatment with a mandibular IOD may improve masticatory performance only in persons with a less than adequate mandibular ridge.     

Effect of mandibular ridge height on masticatory performance with mandibular conventional and implant-assisted overdentures

Purpose

This study assessed the impact of mandibular bone height on masticatory performance following treatment with a mandibular conventional denture (CD) or implant-retained overdenture (IOD).

Materials and Methods

Evaluation of masticatory performance in 63 participants was made with original CDs and 6 months after treatment completion with new dentures; 25 patients received a mandibular CD and 38 received a mandibular IOD. Anterior ridge height at the mandibular symphysis was determined on lateral cephalograms to provide subgroups of low (< or = 21 mm), moderate (> 21 mm, < 28 mm), and high (< or = 28 mm) ridge height for both CDs and IODs. Masticatory performance tests on the preferred chewing side (PS) and swallowing threshold tests were made with peanuts and carrots.

Results

Analysis of variance was used for comparisons of mean change in performance after treatment with study dentures for the 3 bone height groups; this indicated significant differences between the CD and IOD for PS masticatory performance with peanuts (P=.05) and carrots (P=.03). Post hoc tests found significant mean differences between the CDs and IODs with peanuts (P=.008) and carrots (P=.01) only in the low bone height group. Although no significant differences were found in swallowing threshold performance, the mean change scores for subjects with low bone height were greater with the IODs than those with CD for swallowing threshold performance, strokes, and time.

Discussion

It is suggested that only in patients with advanced ridge resorption is the mandibular IOD more likely than a CD to result in improvements in masticatory performance.

Conclusion

The study indicated that treatment with a mandibular IOD may improve masticatory performance only in persons with a less than adequate mandibular ridge.     

Masticatory performance and mandibular movement patterns of patients with natural dentitions, complete dentures, and implant-supported overdentures

The aim of this study was to compare quantitatively the masticatory performance of patients with overdentures supported by two implants, conventional complete dentures, and natural dentitions. Each patient was asked to chew a gelatin cube. The collected remains of the test food (gelatine cube) were fractioned by a sieving procedure and weighed. Maximum mouth opening and masticatory area were measured using kinesiography. There were statistically significant differences among groups with respect to masticatory performance using a 3.15-mm-diameter sieve (P < .001) and 0.5-mm-diameter sieve (P < .001), masticatory area (P = .019), and maximum mouth opening (P < .001). Increasing retention of a mandibular complete denture with two implants improved masticatory performance.     

Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare elderly patients' satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life with mandibular two-implant overdentures and conventional dentures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty edentulous subjects aged 65 to 75 years were randomly assigned to two groups treated with maxillary conventional dentures and either a mandibular conventional denture (n = 30) or an overdenture supported by two implants with ball retainers (n = 30). Subjects rated their general satisfaction, as well as other features of their dentures (comfort, stability, ability to chew, speech, esthetics, and cleaning ability), prior to treatment and 2 months postdelivery. Changes in ratings on the original Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) and its short form (OHIP-EDENT) were also used as indicators of oral health-related quality of life. RESULTS: The primary outcome of this study, ratings of general satisfaction 2 months postdelivery, was significantly better in the group treated with mandibular two-implant overdentures (P = .001). In addition, the implant group gave significantly higher ratings on comfort, stability, and ability to chew. Furthermore, using OHIP-EDENT, subjects who received mandibular two-implant overdentures had significantly fewer oral health-related quality of life problems than did the conventional group. CONCLUSION: These short-term results suggest that mandibular two-implant overdentures combined with maxillary conventional dentures provide better function and oral health-related quality of life than conventional dentures.     

A short-term clinical trial on selected outcomes for immediately loaded implant-supported mandibular overdentures

PURPOSE: This clinical trial aimed to evaluate the outcomes of implant-supported mandibular overdentures (ISMOs) using 2 different loading protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two groups of 10 edentulous patients each were selected for the study. Each patient received 2 implants placed in the mandibular canine sites. After 1 week, ISMOs were delivered to the 10 patients in the test group, while conventional mandibular dentures were delivered to the 10 patients in the control group. The conventional prostheses were converted to ISMOs after 3 months. Treatment outcomes for the ISMOs were evaluated 1 year after implant surgery. RESULTS: The number of appointments and time needed for fabrication of ISMOs revealed statistically significant differences between the patient groups. The requirements for prosthodontic maintenance of ISMOs in the test group were higher than those in the control group; however, these differences were not statistically significant. The mean marginal bone resorption for each group was 0.3 mm after 1 year. CONCLUSION: The results of this clinical trial suggest that early loading of a specific length of implants used to support mandibular overdentures does not jeopardize treatment outcomes during the first year of service.     

Posterior mandibular residual ridge resorption in patients with conventional dentures and implant overdentures

PURPOSE: This study investigated the effects of certain systemic and local factors on resorption of the posterior mandibular residual ridge under conventional dentures and overdentures supported by 2 implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Proportional area measurements of the posterior mandible were made on rotational tomograms taken immediately before and 5 years after treatment. The area was bounded by a line joining gonion to the lowest point of the mental foramen and the crest of the residual ridge and was expressed as a proportion of an area that was not dependent on the ridge. The use of proportions rather than actual measurements minimized errors related to magnification and distortion. RESULTS: The estimated average reduction in height was 1.25 mm in 5 years (1.63 mm for conventional denture groups and 0.69 mm for implant overdenture groups, ie, almost 1 mm less in the overdenture group). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Female gender was a risk factor for greater resorption. Other factors, such as the number of years a patient had been edentulous, initial height of the mandible, and the number of dentures used, failed to show an association with resorption of the residual posterior mandibular ridge, while the statistically significant effect of age was unlikely to be clinically significant.     

A randomized controlled trial of implant-retained mandibular overdentures

Evidence from randomized clinical trials of implant-retained overdentures is very limited at the present time. The aim of this study was to compare implant-retained mandibular overdentures and conventional complete dentures in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Our a priori hypothesis was that implant-retained mandibular overdentures would be significantly better than conventional complete dentures. Edentulous patients (n = 118) were randomly allocated to either an Implant Group (n = 62) or a Denture Group (n = 56). Patients completed the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) and a denture satisfaction scale pre-treatment and three months post-treatment. Upon completion of treatment, both groups reported improvement (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon Ranks Sum test) in oral-health-related quality of life and denture satisfaction. There were no significant post-treatment differences between the groups, but a treatment effect may be masked by application of "intention to treat" analysis. The OHIP change scores were significantly greater for patients receiving implants than for those who refused them.     

Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment

PURPOSE: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the relative efficacy of mandibular overdentures retained by only two implants and a bar attachment with conventional dentures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Edentulous adults, aged 35 to 65 years, were randomly assigned to two groups that received either a mandibular conventional denture (n = 48) or an overdenture supported by two endosseous implants with a connecting bar (n = 54). All subjects rated their general satisfaction and other features of their original dentures and their new prostheses (comfort, stability, ability to chew, speech, esthetics, and cleaning ability) on 100-mm visual analogue scales prior to treatment and 2 months postdelivery. Oral health-related quality of life was also evaluated pre- and posttreatment. RESULTS: Multiple regression analysis revealed that the mean general satisfaction was significantly higher in the overdenture group than in the conventional denture group (P = .0001). Age, gender, marital status, and income were not significantly associated with ratings of general satisfaction. Furthermore, the implant group gave significantly higher ratings on three additional measures of the prostheses (comfort, stability, and ease of chewing; P < .05). CONCLUSION: A mandibular two-implant overdenture opposed by a maxillary conventional denture is a more satisfactory treatment than conventional dentures for edentulous middle-aged adults.     

无牙颌患者对下颌种植义齿和传统全口义齿的满意度调查

目的：评估分别使用种植体支持全口覆盖义齿和传统全口义齿的无牙颌患者的舒适度,并比较其对修复的期望值和满意度。方法和材料：162例无牙颌患者（中年组102例．老年组60例）随机分为2颗种植体支持的覆盖义齿修复组和传统全口义齿修复组。分组前．记录每位患者对旧义齿的满意度及对新义齿的期望值。修复6个月后,记录患者对新义齿的满意度并与期望值进行比较。结果：传统义齿组对新义齿的满意度显著低于期望值。而种植覆盖义齿组的后期满意度基本达到期望值。结论：重新修复的传统义齿满意度未达到期望值,而种植支持的覆盖义齿满足了患者的期望。     

Cost-effectiveness of mandibular two-implant overdentures and conventional dentures in the edentulous elderly

Implementation of new therapies is usually governed by financial considerations, so efficacy studies should also include cost comparisons. The cost and effectiveness of mandibular conventional dentures (CD, n = 30) and two-implant overdentures (IOD, n = 30) were compared in elderly subjects. Effectiveness (Oral Health Impact Profile, OHIP-20) and cost were measured up to one year post-treatment. Data for subsequent years were estimated by the Delphi method. Using an average life expectancy of 17.9 years, the equalized annual costs (in Canadian dollars) were dollar 399 for CD and dollar 625 for IOD (p < 0.001), and the equalized annual values for the outcome (OHIP-20) were 47.0 for CD and 31.3 for IOD treatment (p < 0.05). These values translate into a yearly additional cost for IOD treatment of dollar 14.41 per OHIP-20 point. These results are key to the implementation of programs to provide this form of therapy for edentulous adults.     

Five years of aftercare of implant-retained mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures

The purpose of this multicentre randomized clinical trial was to analyse surgical and prosthetic aftercare and clinical implant performance of edentulous patients with implant‐retained mandibular overdentures and of patients with conventional dentures, either or not after pre‐prosthetic vestibuloplasty and deepening of the floor of the mouth. The evaluation period was 5 years. The implant systems evaluated were the IMZ implant system, the Brånemark implant system and the Transmandibular Implant system. The centre in Groningen had five groups (n=149) and the centre in Nijmegen had three groups (n=86). The evaluation comprised of surgical and prosthetic aftercare, together with clinical implant performance (CIP). The highest implant loss (29%) is found in the Transmandibular Implant group. All groups had prosthetic revisions and complications according to the CIP‐scale. The majority of the patients in the endosseous implant groups were subject to minor complications. The CIP‐score of the Transmandibular Implant group is significantly higher than the scores of the other groups, because of the high number of lost posts. In 26˙1% of the patients in this group score 4 is given, which means failure of the implant system. From this study it can be concluded that the endosseous implant systems used in this study have less surgical aftercare and a better clinical implant performance than the Transmandibular Implant system and are therefore the systems of choice for the edentulous mandible.