Dynamic range of hepatitis C virus RNA quantification with the Cobas Ampliprep-Cobas Amplicor HCV Monitor v2.0 assay

Accurate quantification of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA is needed in clinical practice to decide whether to continue or stop pegylated interferon-alpha-ribavirin combination therapy at week 12 of treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C. Currently the HCV RNA quantification assay most widely used worldwide is the Amplicor HCV Monitor v2.0 assay (Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, Calif.). The HCV RNA extraction step can be automated in the Cobas Ampliprep device. In this work, we show that the dynamic range of HCV RNA quantification of the Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas Amplicor HCV Monitor v2.0 procedure is 600 to 200,000 HCV RNA IU/ml (2.8 to 5.3 log IU/ml), which does not cover the full range of HCV RNA levels in infected patients. Any sample containing more than 200,000 IU/ml (5.3 log IU/ml) must thus be retested after dilution for accurate quantification. These results emphasize the need for commercial HCV RNA quantification assays with a broader range of linear quantification, such as real-time PCR-based assays.     

Performance of the New Bayer VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 assay for quantitation of hepatitis C virus RNA in plasma and serum: conversion to international units and comparison with the Roche COBAS Amplicor HCV Monitor, Version 2.0, assay

We have evaluated the VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0. Assay (HCV 3.0 bDNA assay) (Bayer Diagnostics, Berkeley, Calif.), which is an improved signal amplification procedure for the HCV 2.0 bDNA assay for the quantitation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in serum or plasma of HCV-infected individuals. The HCV 3.0 bDNA assay has a linear dynamic range of 2.5 x 10(3) to 4.0 x 10(7) HCV RNA copies per ml (c/ml). The performance of the HCV 3.0 bDNA assay was evaluated using three different test panels. An overall specificity of 96.8% relative to the detection limit of the HCV 3.0 bDNA assay was found. The intra- and interrun reproducibilities for both the dilution panel and the NAP (AcroMetrix, Benicia, Calif.) panel were consistent with coefficients of variation of less than 9%. Quantitation with the HCV 3.0 bDNA assay was linear over the entire range of both panels (ranges of 4.4 x 10(3) to 3.5 x 10(6) c/ml and 5 x 10(3) to 2 x 10(6) IU/ml, respectively), with correlation coefficients of 0.999, slopes close to one, and intercepts close to zero. The regression equation indicated that 1 IU corresponded to about 4.8 copies of HCV RNA. A correlation coefficient of 0.941 was found for HCV RNA values (in international units per milliliter) obtained from the HCV 3.0 bDNA assay and the HCV Monitor version 2.0 assay (HCV Monitor 2.0 assay) (Roche Diagnostic Systems, Branchburg, N.J.). Quantitative results obtained close to the lower limit of the HCV 3.0 bDNA assay might imply that its lower limit should be reconsidered and raised, if necessary. It appeared that quantitation values obtained from the HCV Monitor 2.0 assay of between 5 x 10(2) and 10(5) IU/ml were in general higher than those obtained from the HCV 3.0 bDNA assay, whereas values obtained from the HCV Monitor 2.0 assay were underestimated for samples with HCV RNA levels above 10(5) IU/ml.     

Comparative evaluation of the VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0, QUANTIPLEX HCV RNA 2.0, and COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR version 2.0 Assays for quantification of hepatitis C virus RNA in serum

A comparison of quantitative results expressed in hepatitis C virus (HCV) international units per milliliter, obtained from the VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 (bDNA-3.0) assay, the QUANTIPLEX HCV RNA 2.0 (bDNA-2.0) assay, and the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR version 2.0 (HCM-2.0) test was performed. A total of 168 patient specimens submitted to the Mayo Clinic Molecular Microbiology Laboratory for HCV quantification or HCV genotyping were studied. Of the specimens tested, 97, 88, and 79% yielded quantitative results within the dynamic range of the bDNA-3.0, bDNA-2.0, and HCM-2.0 assays, respectively. Overall, there was substantial agreement between the results generated by all three assays. A total of 15 out of 29 (52%) of the specimens determined to contain viral loads of <31,746 IU/ml by the bDNA-3.0 assay were categorized as containing viral loads within the range of 31,746 to 500,000 IU/ml by the bDNA-2.0 assay. Although substantial agreement was noted between the results generated by the bDNA-2.0 and bDNA-3.0 assays, a bias toward higher viral titer by the bDNA-2.0 assay was noted (P = 0.001). Likewise, although substantial agreement was noted between the results generated by the HCM-2.0 and bDNA-3.0 assays, a bias toward higher viral titer by the bDNA-3.0 assay was noted (P < or = 0.001). The discrepancy between the HCM-2.0 and bDNA-3.0 results was more pronounced when viral loads were >500,000 IU/ml and resulted in statistically significant differences (P < or = 0.001) in determining whether viral loads were above or below 800,000 IU/ml of HCV RNA, the proposed threshold value for tailoring the duration of combination therapy. The expression of quantitative values in HCV international units per milliliter was a strength of both the bDNA-3.0 and HCM-2.0 assays.     

Sensitivity and reproducibility of HCV quantitation in chimpanzee sera using TaqMan real-time PCR assay

The availability of molecular protocols for the detection and quantitation of very low numbers of hepatitis C virus (HCV) particles in biological samples is an issue of interest in both clinical and analytical fields of HCV research. A sensitive and reproducible assay is described for HCV RNA quantitation using the TaqMan PCR fluorogenic real-time detection system to establish the levels of HCV RNA in chimpanzee plasma. Our TaqMan PCR protocol and synthetic full length HCV RNA template show that the threshold of sensitivity for our TaqMan PCR is two copies per reaction. As few as 10 genome copies per reaction could be quantitated maintaining a linear range. The accuracy of the TaqMan PCR test was comparable to commercial bDNA and Amplicor tests. The RNA standards of the laboratory were tested in parallel with a World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard for HCV RNA obtaining ratios of 2.7+/-0.7 RNA copies per HCV international unit (IU). Our method using RNA extracted from chimpanzee samples had an estimated sensitivity of 200 RNA copies/ml of plasma (approximately eight copies/reaction or 74 WHO IU/ml). Serial plasma samples from HCV-infected chimpanzees were analyzed using this methodology to evaluate its applicability, and RNA profiles were observed consistent with the evolution of the pathology in each animal. The present study therefore illustrates the high reproducibility, sensitivity and reliability of our TaqMan methodology, providing a useful method for HCV research to consistently detect and quantify viral RNA throughout a range of concentrations.     

Prediction of the efficacy of antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus infection by an ultrasensitive RT-PCR assay

The efficacy of interferon therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection improved remarkably. However, virologic relapse occurs in a substantial proportion of patients with virologic response (defined as an HCV RNA level below 50 IU/ml at the end-of-treatment). A highly sensitive RT-nested PCR assay capable of detecting almost a single copy of HCV RNA and a real-time RT-PCR assay to quantify HCV RNA down to 120 copies per ml were developed. The RT-nested PCR assay showed that 1 IU of HCV RNA is equivalent to 12.2 copies. For 28 patients with virologic response (12 relapsers and 16 sustained virologic responders), week-4 and end-of-treatment plasma samples were retested. At week 4, HCV RNA was detected by the RT-nested PCR and qualitative COBAS Amplicor HCV version 2.0 in 8/9 (89%) and 6/9 (67%) samples from relapsers, and in 4/16 (25%) and 2/16 (13%) samples from sustained virologic responders, respectively. End-of-treatment samples with HCV-negative by the qualitative COBAS Amplicor were positive by the present assay in 4/12 (25%) of relapsing patients and 0/16 (0%) of sustained virologic responders. The viral levels detected by the present assay in the Amplicor-negative samples were 3.5-17.3 copies/ml, which is below the detection limit of COBAS Amplicor. In conclusion, the highly sensitive RT-nested PCR assay can predict sustained virologic response at week 4 and virologic relapse at the end-of-treatment more accurately than COBAS Amplicor, suggesting its usefulness in monitoring antiviral therapy for HCV infection.     

Comparison of different HCV viral load and genotyping assays.

BACKGROUND: We report an interlaboratory comparison of methods for the determination of hepatitis C virus (HCV) serum load and genotype between a recently, established molecular laboratory at the Alaska Native Medical Center (ANMC) and two independent laboratories using different assays. At ANMC, a Real-time quantitative RT-PCR amplification methodology (QPCR) has been developed in which HCV viral loads are determined by interpolation of QPCR results to those of standards calibrated to the World Health Organization (WHO) First International Standard for HCV. HCV genotype is subsequently determined by direct sequencing of the DNA fragment generated from the QPCR assay. OBJECTIVES AND STUDY DESIGN: The above methods were statistically compared to results obtained for the same patient sera by two independent laboratories using different commercially available viral load assays; Quantiplex HCV RNA (Bayer Diagnostics) and Amplicor HCV Monitor (v 2.0) (Roche Molecular Systems), as well as two different genotyping assays; restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and INNO-LiPA HCV II (Innogenetics). RESULTS: ANMC's Real-time QPCR HCV viral load results compared moderately well with those obtained by the Quantiplex HCV RNA method (R2=0.3813), and compared quite well with recent lot numbers of Amplicor HCV Monitor in which viral loads are derived in IU/ml (R2=0.6408), but compared poorly with earlier lot numbers of Amplicor HCV Monitor in which viral loads were derived in copies/ml (R2=0.0913). The ANMC direct sequencing method for genotype determination compared moderately to very well with both the RFLP (84-86%) and INNO-LiPA (85-97.5%) methods. CONCLUSIONS: These viral load comparisons highlight the discrepancies that may occur when patient HCV viral loads are monitored using different types of assays. Comparison of HCV genotype by different methods is more reliable statistically and important clinically for predicting probability of response to antiviral therapy. However, viral loads are important for monitoring response once therapy has begun.     

Evaluation of the COBAS amplicor HBV monitor assay and comparison with the ultrasensitive HBV hybrid capture 2 assay for quantification of hepatitis B virus DNA

Performance characteristics of the COBAS Amplicor HBV Monitor test (Roche Diagnostics), which measures hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA quantitatively, were evaluated and compared with the Ultrasensitive HBV Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2; Digene Corporation) assay. Linearity and within-run precision were assessed for both methods by using eight HBV DNA-positive samples serially diluted to obtain a range of <100 to 500,000 HBV DNA copies/ml and run in triplicate. Agreement between the methods was studied with 100 clinical samples. HC2 assay performance near the limit of detection was investigated through repeat testing of 149 samples with HC2 and testing of 37 samples with HC2 results of <4,700 HBV DNA copies/ml by Amplicor assay and a qualitative PCR assay. The linearity experiment for Amplicor had regression of observed values compared to expected values (y = 1.073x - 0.247; R(2) = 0.993, n = 32; for HC2, y = 0.855x + 0.759, R(2) = 0.729, n = 18). Within-run standard deviation of log HBV DNA copies/ml ranged from 0.003 to 0.348 (Amplicor) and 0.027 to 0.253 (HC2). Agreement assessed by Deming regression was poor [Amplicor = 1.197(HC2) - 0.961; R(2) = 0.799, standard error of the estimate (SEE) = 0.710, n = 94]. Near the lower limit of detection, 32 of 149 repeat HC2 results were <4,700 HBV DNA copies/ml. Of the 37 samples with HC2 results of <4,700 HBV DNA copies/ml, HBV DNA was not detected in 15 samples, while HBV DNA was detected by at least one PCR method in 12 samples. Amplicor is linear from 200 to 200,000 HBV DNA copies/ml with undiluted samples, and this range can be expanded through dilution. Inconsistent HC2 results near the limit of detection justify use of a grey zone.     

Performance characteristics of the COBAS AMPLICOR hepatitis C virus MONITOR Test, version 2.0

We evaluated the performance characteristics of the COBAS AMPLICOR Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) MONITOR Test, version 2.0. Dilution studies using patient specimens demonstrated a lower limit of detection of 1,000 copies per milliliter. The assay was linear from 1,000 to 1 million HCV RNA copies per milliliter. Within-run precision and between-run precision were acceptable (approximately 0.100 and 0.14 SD for log10 [copies per milliliter]). A comparison of this version of the test (y), with the manual AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR Test, version 1.0 (x), yielded the following Deming regression equation: y = 1.004(+/- 0.04)x + 0.654(+/- 0.22); Sy/x?D = 0.336; n = 92; r2 = 0.846; r = 0.920. Further comparison of the COBAS version 2.0 assay (x) with the QUANTIPLEX HCV bDNA Test (y) yielded the following Deming regression equation: y = 0.943 (+/- 0.130)x + 0.473 (+/- 0.717); Sy/x?D = 0.194; n = 26; r2 = 0.600; r = 0.774. Version 2.0 detected the spectrum of HCV genotypes better than version 1.0.     

Clinical performance of the LCx HCV RNA quantitative assay

This study was conducted to assess the performance of the Abbott laboratories LCx HCV RNA Quantitative Assay (LCx assay) in the clinical setting. Four clinical laboratories measured LCx assay precision, specificity, and linearity. In addition, a method comparison was conducted between the LCx assay and the Roche HCV Amplicor Monitor, version 2.0 (Roche Monitor 2.0) and the Bayer VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 Assay (Bayer bDNA 3.0) quantitative assays. For precision, the observed LCx assay intra-assay standard deviation (S.D.) was 0.060-0.117 log IU/ml, the inter-assay S.D. was 0.083-0.133 log IU/ml, the inter-lot S.D. was 0.105-0.177 log IU/ml, the inter-site S.D. was 0.099-0.190 log IU/ml, and the total S.D. was 0.113-0.190 log IU/ml. The specificity of the LCx assay was 99.4% (542/545; 95% CI, 98.4-99.9%). For linearity, the mean pooled LCx assay results were linear (r=0.994) over the range of the panel (2.54-5.15 log IU/ml). A method comparison demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.881 between the LCx assay and Roche Monitor 2.0, 0.872 between the LCx assay and Bayer bDNA 3.0, and 0.870 between Roche Monitor 2.0 and Bayer bDNA 3.0. The mean LCx assay result was 0.04 log IU/ml (95% CI, -0.08, 0.01) lower than the mean Roche Monitor 2.0 result, but 0.57 log IU/ml (95% CI, 0.53, 0.61) higher than the mean Bayer bDNA 3.0 result. The mean Roche Monitor 2.0 result was 0.60 log IU/ml (95% CI, 0.56, 0.65) higher than the mean Bayer bDNA 3.0 result. The LCx assay quantitated genotypes 1-4 with statistical equivalency. The vast majority (98.9%, 278/281) of paired LCx assay-Roche Monitor 2.0 specimen results were within 1 log IU/ml. Similarly, 86.6% (240/277) of paired LCx assay and Bayer bDNA 3.0 specimen results were within 1 log, as were 85.6% (237/277) of paired Roche Monitor 2.0 and Bayer specimen results. These data demonstrate that the LCx assay may be used for quantitation of HCV RNA in HCV-infected individuals.     

Improved estimation of the distribution of suppressed plasma HIV-1 RNA in men receiving effective antiretroviral therapy

Plasma HIV-1 RNA was measured in 306 samples, collected from 273 highly active antiretroviral therapy-experienced men, using both the Roche COBAS TaqMan (limit of detection = 20 copies per milliliter) and Roche Amplicor (limit of detection = 50 copies per milliliter) assays. Mixtures of Gaussian distributions incorporating left-censored data were used in analyses. The more sensitive TaqMan assay estimated that 23% and 0.0003% of HIV-1 RNA values would be below 1 copy per milliliter and 1 copy per 3 L, respectively. This is in sharp contrast to the overestimation provided by the less sensitive Amplicor assay, whereby the corresponding predicted percentages were 51% and 1%. Both assays appropriately characterized suboptimal virologic response as the rightmost peaks of both distributions provided an excellent fit to the observed data. Our results based on a widely available 20 copies per milliliter sensitive assay reproduce those obtained using customized assays that quantified HIV-1 RNA values as low as 1 copy per milliliter.     

Evaluation of the NucliSens EasyQ assay in HIV-1-infected individuals in South Africa

We compared the performance of the NucliSens EasyQ assay (bioMerieux) combined with the manual NucliSens miniMag extraction methodology to the Roche Cobas Ampliprep/Standard Amplicor Monitor methodology (Roche Diagnostics) for HIV-1 RNA quantitation in HIV-1-infected individuals in South Africa. Plasma samples (284) from HIV sero-positive patients at different stages of infection were analyzed. The distribution of results was typical of the clinical samples received at the laboratory where 20% have viral load results <400 copies/ml (2.6 log) and 18% have viral load results >750000 copies/ml (5.8 log) using the Roche Amplicor Monitor standard assay. All statistical analyses were performed using log10-transformed values for all the variables in the analyses, i.e. log10EasyQIU/ml, and log10RNA (log10 copies/ml, Amplicor). Roche values were converted from RNA copies per ml to IU/ml by multiplying the Roche value by 0.51. HIV RNA levels quantitated by the NucliSens EasyQ assay correlated significantly with those of the Roche Cobas Amplicor Monitor assay (r=0.874, p<0.0001). Reproducibility of the NucliSens EasyQ assay in the log6IU range yielded CV variance of 1.3-2.84% for two well-trained technologists. In addition, a retrospective evaluation of the performance of the NucliSens EasyQ assay in 102 runs (2448) samples was conducted in the laboratory over a 4-month interval. Factors considered during this evaluation included time taken to perform the assay, volume requirements, number of required repeats, potential for contamination.     

Detection and quantitation of HCV RNA using real-time PCR after automated sample processing

There is considerable evidence that the loss of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA during the first 3 months of treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin is a prognostic marker of response to therapy. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for quantifying HCV RNA in plasma or serum are now commercially available. The extraction of HCV RNA can also be automated. This report analyses the performance of the COBAS Ampliprep-COBAS Taqman 48 (CAP/CTM) real-time PCR assay and compares this new test with the COBAS Amplicor HCV Monitor v 2.0 assay (CAM). CAP/CTM was 100% specific. The assay was linear across a wide range of HCV RNA concentrations without sample dilution. The intra-assay variation was 0.3-3.3% and the interassay variation was 1.5-6.7%. A total of 118 clinical samples with different HCV genotypes were assayed using both methods. The results obtained using the two methods were well correlated (r = 0.89, P < 0.001). The mean difference [CAP/CTM-CAM] was 0.17 log IU/ml and it was not influenced by the HCV genotype or by the subtype. It is concluded that the new CAP/CTM system is adequate for quantifying HCV RNA in clinical practice.     

Assessment of early virological response to antiviral therapy by comparing four assays for HCV RNA quantitation using the international unit standard: implications for clinical management of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection

WHO International Standards for nucleic acid tests are used widely to compare the different assays used in HCV RNA quantitation. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of the international unit standard for measuring HCV RNA in the management of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Twenty‐seven naïve patients infected chronically by HCV were treated with ribavirin plus PEG‐interferon‐alfa‐2b for 48 weeks. SVR was obtained for 16 patients (the other were non‐responders). For HCV RNA quantitation, four assays were undertaken: Versant HCV RNA 3.0 (Bayer), Real time PCR (TaqMan, Roche), LCx HCV RNA (Abbott), and Cobas Amplicor‐Monitor v2 (Roche). Considering a 2‐log decline at Week 12 after the beginning of therapy, discordant results were found with the four HCV RNA methods in predicting SVR or non‐response. At Week 4 and Week 12, significant differences were observed between Versant HCV RNA 3.0 versus PCR HCV Taqman, Versant HCV RNA 3.0 versus LCx HCV RNA, Cobas Monitor Amplicor HCV 2.0 versus LCx HCV RNA, and Cobas Monitor Amplicor HCV 2.0 versus PCR HCV Taqman (P < 0.001). The HCV RNA cutoff, given a 100% negative predictive value at Week 4 and Week 12, differed with the assays used to quantify HCV RNA, despite the use of the IU/ml units. Eighty‐nine percent of serum values for HCV RNA were concordant by the IU standard. All assays, however, failed to detect HCV RNA in some cases. Despite the use of the IU standard HCV‐infected patients might be monitored with only one assay. J. Med. Virol. 78:208–215, 2006. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.