Insomnia related to postmenopausal syndrome and hormone replacement therapy: sleep laboratory studies on baseline differences between patients and controls and double-blind,placebo-controlled investigations on the effects of a novel estrogen-progestogen combination (Climodien,Lafamme) versus estrogen alone

Differences in sleep and awakening quality between 51 insomniac postmenopausal syndrome patients and normal controls were evaluated. In a subsequent double-blind, placebo-controlled, comparative, randomized, three-arm trial (Climodien 2/3 = estradiol valerate 2 mg + the progestogen dienogest 3 mg = regimen A, estradiol valerate 2 mg = regimen EV, and placebo = regimen P), the effects of 2 months of hormone replacement therapy were investigated, followed by a 2-month open-label phase in which all patients received Climodien 2/2 (EV 2 mg + dienogest 2 mg = regimen A*). Polysomnography at baseline demonstrated significantly deteriorated sleep initiation and maintenance, increased S1 and decreased S2 in patients. Subjective sleep and awakening quality, well-being, morning drive, wakefulness, memory and reaction time performance were deteriorated too. Treatment with both regimen A and regimen EV induced a moderate, although nonsignificant, improvement in the primary efficacy variable wakefulness during the total sleep period compared with baseline, while under placebo no changes occurred. Secondary efficacy variables concerning sleep initiation and maintenance, and sleep architecture showed similar findings. The apnea and apnea-hypopnea indices improved significantly under regimen A, compared with both baseline and placebo. Subjective sleep and awakening quality improved significantly after regimen A and EV compared with baseline, with the drug-induced changes being superior to those induced by placebo. In the open-label phase, subjective sleep quality improved further, significantly in the former regimen A group. Awakening quality, somatic complaints and morning thymopsyche did not yield any significant findings. Concerning morning noopsychic performance, memory improved significantly after regimen A compared with baseline, fine motor activity after regimen EV. Reaction time performance increased with all three compounds. In conclusion, Climodien significantly improved subjective sleep quality, the apnea and apnea-hypopnea indices of insomniac postmenopausal syndrome patients, while it only marginally improved variables concerning objective sleep and awakening quality.     

Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on symptoms of depression and anxiety in non-depressive menopausal women: a randomized double-blind, controlled study

The efficacy of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) for mood disturbances associated with menopause has yet to be firmly established. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of ERT for improving mood and anxiety of non-depressive postmenopausal women. This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study involved two treatment groups: one receiving conjugated equine estrogens (CEEs; 0.625 mg/day) and the other placebo, for six cycles of 28 days each. Subjects were hysterectomized, healthy, non-depressive (according to Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia, Life Time Version [SADS-L]) women. Depressive and anxiety symptoms were assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), respectively. The Profile of Mood States (POMS) and other scales were used to characterize symptoms. In both groups, BDI scores were significantly lower at cycles 1, 2, 3, and 6, compared with baseline assessments (p < 0.01). Anxiety scores for both groups significantly improved from cycle 3 to study endpoint. The only significant difference favoring the active group occurred at cycle 1. POMS scores were significantly improved at the end of cycles 1, 2, 3 and 6 among treated subjects and at the end of cycles 2, 3, and 6 among placebo subjects. ERT is not associated with improvements in mood or anxiety symptoms in non-depressive, hysterectomized, postmenopausal women.     

Immediate versus deferred empirical antifungal (IDEA) therapy in high-risk patients with febrile neutropenia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study

Empirical antifungal therapy is widely used in high-risk neutropenic hematology patients with fever persisting for more than 4 days. This clinical trial assessed whether immediate empirical therapy with voriconazole could lower the rates of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) compared with this approach. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, patients with acute leukemia undergoing chemotherapy or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients were randomized to broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy plus voriconazole (immediate) or placebo (deferred) after the onset of neutropenic fever. If fever persisted for 96 h, patients were switched to open-label intravenous voriconazole; oral treatment was permitted after 96 h. The primary endpoint was the rate of proven/probable IFIs between Days 2 and 28 after fever onset in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) complete-case population. One hundred and forty-seven patients were randomized to immediate (n?=?81) or deferred (n?=?66) voriconazole. In the mITT population, six patients in the immediate group and nine in the deferred group developed proven/probable IFI between Days 2 and 28 (p?=?0.258). The safety profiles were similar in both groups. While immediate empirical therapy with voriconazole appears to be safe in febrile neutropenic high-risk patients, it was not associated with a significant reduction in IFIs compared with therapy deferred for 96 h after fever onset.     

Growth hormone and somatomedin C during post-menopausal replacement therapy with oestrogen alone and in combination with an antioestrogen

Serum concentrations of growth hormone (GH) and somatomedin C were monitored in 14 women during post-menopausal replacement therapy with oestrogen alone and in combination with a specific antioestrogen. During 3 mth of treatment with ethinyl oestradiol (10 μg daily), the mean serum GH level rose from 2.8 ± 0.78 mU/l (mean ± S.E.M.) to 6.5 ± 0.39 mU/l, whereas the concentration of somatomedin C fell from 22.4 ± 0.89 to 15.4 ± 0.43 nM. These changes during unopposed oestrogen treatment were clearly reversed by the addition of tamoxifen (20 mg daily), following which GH concentrations fell to pre-treatment levels. It is suggested that oestrogens inhibit somatomedin C production in the liver and that GH secretion may play an important role in regard to certain liver effects induced by oral oestrogen therapy.     

Acarbose in obese patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND: The present study assessed the effects of low-dose acarbose on obese patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). METHODS: A double-blind placebo-controlled study was conducted on 30 obese hyperinsulinaemic women with PCOS treated with 150 mg/day acarbose or placebo for 6 months. The women were evaluated for hirsutism, menstrual regularity, body mass index (BMI), insulin resistance and glucose tolerance, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), LH, FSH, testosterone and androstenedione, and side-effects. RESULTS: The patients in the acarbose group showed a reduction in BMI (35.87 +/- 2.60 versus 33.10 +/- 2.94 kg/m(2)) and in the Ferriman-Gallwey index (8.85 +/- 2.31 versus 8 +/- 1.82), and an increased chance of menstrual regularity (rate = 2.67). SHBG concentration increased (21.01 +/- 7.9 versus 23.85 +/- 7.77 nmol/l) and the free androgen index was reduced (14.81 +/- 9.06 versus 11.48 +/- 6.18). None of these parameters were modified in the placebo group. Mild side-effects occurred in 84% of the patients in the acarbose group and disappeared after the first 3 months. CONCLUSION: A low dose of acarbose administered to obese patients with PCOS promotes a reduction in free androgen index and BMI and an increase in SHBG, with improvement of hirsutism and of the menstrual pattern, and is well tolerated by patients.     

Efficacy of clarithromycin-naproxen-oseltamivir combination therapy versus oseltamivir alone in hospitalized pediatric influenza patients

PurposeThis study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of clarithromycin-naproxen-oseltamivir combination therapy to that of oseltamivir therapy alone in hospitalized pediatric influenza patients.MethodsThis prospective, single-blind study included children aged 1–18 years hospitalized with influenza, in MacKay Children's Hospital, Taiwan, between December 2017 and December 2019. The primary outcomes were the time to defervescence and decrease of the Pediatric Respiratory Severity Score (PRESS) during hospitalization. The secondary outcomes were serial changes in virus titers, measured using real-time polymerase chain reaction.ResultsFifty-four patients were enrolled (28 in the control group and 26 in the combination group) in total. There were no differences in the patients’ baseline characteristics between the groups. The time to defervescence was significantly shorter in the combination group than the oseltamivir group (13.2 h vs. 32.1 h, p = 0.002). The decrease in the virus titer from days 1–3 (log Δ13) was more pronounced in the combination group than the oseltamivir group. (39% vs. 19%, p = 0.001). There were no differences in adverse effects such as vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain during the study or within 30 days after antiviral therapy.ConclusionThe clarithromycin-naproxen-oseltamivir combination group experienced a more rapid defervescence and a more rapid decline of influenza virus titer than the group treated with oseltamivir alone. Further consideration should be given to whether the overall benefits of combination therapy in hospitalized pediatric influenza patients outweigh the risks.     

特纳综合征患者早期雌激素替代治疗改善骨密度

目的探讨早期雌激素替代治疗对特纳综合征(TS)患者骨密度(BMD)改善的效果。方法选取2005年8月到2015年8月就诊于北京协和医院内分泌科矮小门诊的27例TS患者,全部测量身高、体质量,雌激素治疗前后的骨密度由LUNAR-PRODGIY型骨密度仪进行测量。比较TS患者雌激素替代治疗前后骨密度的差异,治疗起始年龄对骨密度的影响。结果应用雌激素治疗后1年内、1~3年、3年L2-4的骨密度分别为(0.96±0.13)g/cm~2、(0.92±0.13)g/cm~2、(0.93±0.14)g/cm~2,显著高于基线水平分别为(0.73±0.08)g/cm~2、(0.70±0.13)g/cm~2、(0.75±0.07)g/cm~2;治疗起始年龄18岁组L2-4骨密度(0.96±0.14)g/cm2显著高于治疗起始年龄≥18岁组(0.90±0.10)g/cm~2。结论早期雌激素替代治疗可更有效地改善TS患者骨密度,但影响骨密度的其他因素仍需进一步深入探究。     

The effect of combination therapy with metformin and combined oral contraceptives (COC) versus COC alone on insulin sensitivity, hyperandrogenaemia, SHBG and lipids in PCOS patients

BACKGROUND: Neither oral contraceptives (COC) nor metformin are an optimal modality for the long-term treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a combination of both is beneficial over COC monotherapy. METHODS: Altogether, 30 women were included in the study and 28 finished the protocol. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups treated with either COC (COC group) or COC and metformin (1500 mg/day) (METOC group) for 6 months. Anthropometric parameters, androgens, lipids, fasting insulin, glucose and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) concentrations were measured before and at the end of the sixth cycle of treatment. The insulin sensitivity index was evaluated using the euglycaemic clamp. RESULTS: There were no significant changes in anthropometric parameters, fasting glucose or insulin sensitivity in either group. Total testosterone, free androgen index, androstenedione and dehydroepiandrosterone decreased and SHBG increased significantly in both groups. When comparing the effect of both treatments, only a more pronounced decrease in free androgen index was found in the METOC group. CONCLUSIONS: Adding metformin slightly modified the treatment effect of COC, causing a more significant decrease in the free androgen index but having no additional positive impact on lipids, insulin sensitivity, SHBG or testosterone. The available data do not offer enough evidence to advocate the standard use of combined treatment in PCOS. Whether the combination might be beneficial for specific subgroups of patients is of further interest.     

Efficacy and tolerability of montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in the fall.

BACKGROUND: Histamine and cysteinyl leukotrienes seem to be important mediators of allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness and tolerability of montelukast, loratadine, and combination therapy with montelukast and loratadine for treating patients with fall seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: After a 1-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period, 907 male and female patients aged 15 to 82 years were randomized to 1 of 4 treatments: montelukast 10 mg (n = 155), loratadine 10 mg (n = 301), combination montelukast 10 mg and loratadine 10 mg (n = 302), or placebo (n = 149), administered once daily at bedtime for 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the daytime nasal symptoms score (mean of congestion, rhinorrhea, pruritus, and sneezing). RESULTS: Mean symptom scores at baseline were similar for the four treatment groups. For each of the three active treatments, the difference was significant for the mean change from baseline compared with placebo (P < or = 0.001). However, the effect of montelukast/loratadine compared with loratadine alone, the primary comparison, was not significantly different. Differences for each therapy alone compared with placebo were also significant for most secondary endpoints, including nighttime symptom scores, eye symptoms scores, and rhinitis-specific quality of life. Differences for montelukast/loratadine compared with each therapy alone generally showed numerical superiority, and a few endpoints showed differences that were statistically significant. All active treatments showed a safety profile generally similar to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine is well tolerated and provides clinical and quality-of-life benefits for patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.     

Progestogen intolerance and compliance with hormone replacement therapy in menopausal women

It is vital that we maximize compliance if patients are to receivethe full benefits from hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Oneof the main factors for reduced compliance is that of progestogenintolerance. Progestogens have a variety of effects apart fromthe one for which their use was intended, that of secretorytransformation of the endometrium. Endometrial effects varybetween individuals and between different progestogens, leadingto bleeding problems. Symptoms of fluid retention are producedby the sodium-retaining effect on the renin-aldosterone system.The nor-testosterone-derived progestogens can have adverse effectson skin, lipids, vasculature and insulin resistance. Negativemood effects are produced by most progestogens due to the effecton neurotransmitters via central nervous system progesteronereceptors. Manipulation of the dosage and duration of progestogen,continuous administration of a low dose of progestogen and areduction in the number of progestogenic episodes can be usedto improve compliance. The progestogen and progesterone releasingcoils and vaginal progesterone gel minimize systemic side effectsand bleeding. Adverse effects can also be avoided by makinguse of the progesterone receptor-specific progestogens suchas the pregnanes (e.g. cyproterone), nor-pregnanes (e.g. nomegestrol)and progesterone itself. Hysterectomy remains an option forthe severely progestogen-intolerant woman. In the future, progestogenintolerance may not be an issue if selective oestrogen receptormodulators provide a complete alternative to HRT.     

Immunotherapy with mosquito (Culex quinquefasciatus) extract: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Mosquito allergy is well established, but mosquito immunotherapy requires validation using clinical and immunologic variables. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of specific immunotherapy with Culex quinquefasciatus (mosquito) extract. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of immunotherapy for 1 year in 40 patients with asthma, rhinitis, or both. Patients were evaluated by means of intradermal testing, symptom and drug scores, and histamine provocation testing before and after 1 year of immunotherapy. Mosquito specific IgE and IgG subclass antibody responses were evaluated at the basal level and after 1 year. RESULTS: Patients receiving allergen immunotherapy for 1 year showed a significant improvement compared with baseline and patients receiving placebo regarding skin reactions, symptom scores (rhinitis and asthma), and forced expiratory volume in 1 second. Provocation concentration of histamine that caused a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 20% by inhalation was elevated in the group receiving immunotherapy. In the active group serologic analysis showed a slight reduction in IgE levels (P = .02) but a significant elevation in IgG4 levels (P = .001), with a significant decrease in the IgE/IgG4 ratio (P = .001). All these changes in the placebo group were nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Allergen immunotherapy with mosquito extract was well tolerated, with improvement in symptoms and airway reactivity. Good clinical outcome was associated with increased IgG4 antibody levels.     

Desloratadine in combination with montelukast in the treatment of chronic urticaria: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND: Chronic urticaria (CU) is a common skin condition. It is frequently a disabling disease due to the persistency of clinical symptoms, the unpredictable course and negative influence on the quality of life. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine whether montelukast, a LTD4 receptor antagonist, plus desloratadine, is more efficacious than desloratadine alone in the treatment of chronic urticaria. MATERIALS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted on 81 patients with a diagnosis of CU. A 1-week single-blind placebo run-in period (baseline) was followed by a 6-weeks double blind active treatment period. The patients were randomized to receive the following treatment once daily: (a) oral desloratadine (5 mg) plus placebo; (b) desloratadine (5 mg) plus montelukast (10 mg); (c) oral placebo alone. The study ended after another 1-week single-blind placebo washout period. RESULTS: The evaluable population thus consisted of 76 patients. Both desloratadine alone and desloratadine plus montelukast administered once daily yielded improvements with respect to the baseline assessment as regards pruritus, number of separate episodes, size and number of weals, visual analogue score and patients' quality of life and with respect to the placebo group both in the active treatment period and in the run-out period. However, desloratadine plus montelukast was shown to improve the symptoms and patients' quality of life significantly more than desloratadine alone, although it did not have a significant effect on the number of urticarial episodes. CONCLUSION: The combination of desloratadine plus montelukast is effective in the treatment of CU. It may therefore be a valid alternative in patients with relatively mild CU, in view of its efficacy and the lack of adverse events.     

Hormone replacement therapy: lipid responses to continuous combined oestrogen and progestogen versus oestrogen monotherapy.

Fifty-five postmenopausal women with climacteric complaints were randomly assigned to treatment with either 2 mg oestradiol valerate (E2V) (cyclic regimen: 21 days of treatment followed by a 7-day treatment-free interval), or 2 mg E2V combined with 1 mg cyproterone acetate (E2V+CPA) daily, over a 6-month period. Treatment was by the oral route in both cases. The aim was to compare the influence of these two hormone replacement therapy regimens on lipid metabolism. Blood samples were obtained before and after 1 and 6 months of treatment. Serum was analyzed for total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoproteins (HDL), apolipoproteins A1 and B and triglycerides. The low-density lipoprotein (LDL) concentrations were derived by calculation. All parameters were evaluated in terms of mean +/- S.D. There was no significant difference in the response of the blood lipids to the two treatments, as assessed by analysis of variance (P greater than 0.05). Serum levels of TC were found to have fallen after month 1 and 6 by 5.3 and 5.6%, respectively, during E2V treatment and by 2.4 and 0.2% during E2V+CPA treatment. Serum HDL levels had increased after months 1 and 6 by 9.7 and 5.2%, respectively, in the E2V group and by 6.9 and 2% in the E2V+CPA group, which was also confirmed by the increase in apolipoprotein A1 levels. There was, however, a borderline increase in LDL and apolipoprotein B in the E2V+CPA group. Serum triglycerides were reduced and serum levels of SHBG increased during treatment in both groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Hormone replacement therapy and symptom reporting in menopausal women: a population-based study of 35-65-year-old women in mid-Sweden.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the prevalence rate of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in the general population and to see whether HRT users report less symptoms, better general health and less use of other palliative than non-users and previous users. METHODS: The study was performed in 1995 as a cross-sectional postal questionnaire study in seven counties in mid-Sweden. The questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 4200 35-64-year-old women of whom 2991 responded. The age distribution of responders and non-responders was similar 49.6+/-8.5 and 49.8+/-8.7 years, respectively. The main outcome measures were vasomotor and general symptoms in relation to menstrual status and HRT. RESULTS: Fifteen percent were on HRT and 2.3% had stopped treatment during the past year. Thirteen percent used other palliatives. Twenty-five percent of premenopausal women experienced any vasomotor symptoms, as compared with 51% of menopausal and 40% of postmenopausal women. Those on HRT reported higher frequencies than non-users of all symptoms except for sweating during the daytime. In addition, menopausal women experienced more of other symptoms, usually not associated with the menopause, than premenopausal and postmenopausal women. HRT users reported a significantly worse perceived health and they took other palliatives drugs to a larger extent than HRT non-users. CONCLUSION: HRT seemed to be effective in relieving some vasomotor symptoms but did not affect the prevalence of other symptoms or perceived health, in spite of the fact that women on HRT supplemented their therapy with palliative drugs to a larger extent than other women.     

Statin therapy alone and in combination with an acyl-CoA:cholesterol O-acyltransferase inhibitor on experimental atherosclerosis

The ability to modify the enzymatic processes involved in promoting atherosclerotic plaque disruption and to serially monitor atherosclerotic evolution could provide novel information in the management of patients with atherosclerosis. We studied the effects of a statin (atorvastatin) and its combination with an acyl-CoA:cholesterol O-acyltransferase (ACAT) inhibitor (avasimibe) on atherosclerotic regression and plaque stability as measured by matrix metalloproteinase 1 and 3 (MMP-1 and MMP-3) levels. Watanabe Heritable Hyperlipidemic (WHHL) rabbits treated with atorvastatin alone experienced an attenuated increase in atherosclerotic burden versus controls as determined by MR imaging. The mean vessel wall area (VWA) prior to drug therapy was 5.57 +/- 0.01 mm2. The VWA increased to 6.71 +/- 0.03 and 7.16 +/- 0.03 mm2, respectively, in atorvastatin-treated and control groups (p < 0.0001 for both). The combination of atorvastatin and avasimibe induced a significant regression of the previously established atherosclerotic lesions, with the VWA decreasing to 4.54 +/- 0.04 mm2 (p = 0.009). Atorvastatin alone induced a nonsignificant reduction in the percent staining of MMP-1 in atherosclerotic lesions, but the combination treatment with avasimibe led to a significant reduction versus controls (p = 0.005). However, a reduction in MMP-3 staining was significant for rabbits treated with both atorvastatin alone (p = 0.007) and in combination with avasimibe (p = 0.04) versus controls. In this animal model, the addition of avasimibe to atorvastatin has beneficial effects on both atherosclerotic plaque regression and stabilization.