Meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcomes with dronedarone in patients with atrial fibrillation or heart failure

Dronedarone is a benzofuran derivative approved by the Food and Drug Administration to decrease the risk of cardiovascular hospitalization in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and associated cardiovascular risk factors who are in sinus rhythm or will undergo cardioversion. There has been recent evidence to suggest that dronedarone may not have a favorable safety profile. We decided to evaluate all available evidence on the cardiovascular safety of this drug. A systematic search was made of the PubMed, CENTRAL, and EMBASE databases for randomized controlled trials from 1966 through 2011 comparing dronedarone to comparators in AF/heart failure. Intervention was dronedarone for AF for some studies and heart failure for others. Comparators included standard medical therapy and/or placebo and amiodarone for 1 study. Outcomes assessed were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, ventricular arrhythmias, embolic events, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure exacerbations, and hospitalization rates in the intervention versus comparator group at the end of ≥ 3 months of follow up with abstraction of data by 1 author. Seven randomized controlled trials were included in our analysis. Dronedarone use was associated with a trend toward worse all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities and increased heart failure exacerbations. It also showed numerically higher event rates for all other outcome events except acute coronary syndrome. Our pooled analysis showed increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities and increased heart failure exacerbations with use of dronedarone across a wide spectrum of populations. In conclusion, we recommend exercising caution using dronedarone, especially in patients with cardiovascular risk factors.     

Cardiovascular effects of beta-agonists in patients with asthma and COPD: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: beta-Adrenergic agonists exert physiologic effects that are the opposite of those of beta-blockers. beta-Blockers are known to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with cardiac disease. beta(2)-Agonist use in patients with obstructive airway disease has been associated with an increased risk for myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, cardiac arrest, and acute cardiac death. OBJECTIVES: To assess the cardiovascular safety of beta(2)-agonist use in patients with obstructive airway disease, defined as asthma or COPD. METHODS: A meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials of beta(2)-agonist treatment in patients with obstructive airway disease was performed, to evaluate the short-term effect on heart rate and potassium concentrations, and the long-term effect on adverse cardiovascular events. Longer duration trials were included in the analysis if they reported at least one adverse event. Adverse events included sinus and ventricular tachycardia, syncope, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, or sudden death. RESULTS: Thirteen single-dose trials and 20 longer duration trials were included in the study. A single dose of beta(2)-agonist increased the heart rate by 9.12 beats/min (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.32 to 12.92) and reduced the potassium concentration by 0.36 mmol/L (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.54), compared to placebo. For trials lasting from 3 days to 1 year, beta(2)-agonist treatment significantly increased the risk for a cardiovascular event (relative risk [RR], 2.54; 95% CI, 1.59 to 4.05) compared to placebo. The RR for sinus tachycardia alone was 3.06 (95% CI, 1.70 to 5.50), and for all other events it was 1.66 (95% CI, 0.76 to 3.6). CONCLUSION: beta(2)-Agonist use in patients with obstructive airway disease increases the risk for adverse cardiovascular events. The initiation of treatment increases heart rate and reduces potassium concentrations compared to placebo. It could be through these mechanisms, and other effects of beta-adrenergic stimulation, that beta(2)-agonists may precipitate ischemia, congestive heart failure, arrhythmias, and sudden death.     

The clinical implications of aldosterone escape in congestive heart failure

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy does not reliably suppress aldosterone production, and 'aldosterone escape' occurs in up to 40% of patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Aldosterone levels correlate with the risk of cardiovascular events. Aldosterone adversely affects the risk of cardiovascular events via mineralocorticoid receptors in the heart, blood vessels and other sites. Notably, aldosterone contributes to endothelial dysfunction and attenuates endothelium-dependent vasodilatation, at least partly by reducing nitric oxide bioavailability. Aldosterone also promotes myocardial fibrosis and cardiac remodelling by enhancing collagen synthesis, resulting in increased myocardial stiffness and increased left ventricular mass. These mechanisms mediated by aldosterone contribute to increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Two major prospective trials, including one in which patients routinely received ACE inhibitor and beta blocker therapy, have shown that the use of an aldosterone blocker significantly reduces all-cause mortality, sudden cardiovascular death and hospitalisation in patients with acute or chronic left ventricular dysfunction or CHF. Inhibition of aldosterone's effect on mineralocorticoid receptors should now be considered standard therapy in these patient populations.     

Clinical trials update from the American Heart Association 2007: CORONA, RethinQ, MASCOT, AF-CHF, HART, MASTER, POISE and stem cell therapy

This article provides information and a commentary on trials relevant to the pathophysiology, prevention and treatment of heart failure, presented at the American Heart Association 2007. These should be considered as preliminary data, as analyses may change in the final publication. Rosuvastatin did not reduce mortality compared to placebo in patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction due to ischaemic heart disease in the CORONA study. Results of RethinQ provide equivocal evidence of benefit from CRT in patients with heart failure, echocardiographic dyssynchrony and QRS interval <130 ms. In the MASCOT study, the addition of atrial overdrive pacing did not reduce the incidence of permanent atrial fibrillation in patients receiving CRT. The AF-CHF study failed to show a benefit of rhythm control over rate control in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Self-management skills training and education had no benefit on the combined outcome of death or heart failure hospitalisation, compared with education alone in heart failure patients in the HART study. Microvolt T-wave alternans testing failed to identify patients at increased risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in the MASTER study. POISE suggests that initiating metoprolol therapy shortly prior to non-cardiac surgery increases the risk of hypotension, stroke and death, despite reducing the risk of myocardial infarction. Three trials of stem cell therapy in post-MI patients gave conflicting results.     

Tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes mellitus without left ventricular systolic dysfunction or clinical evidence of heart failure: a pooled meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials

Aim:  The aim of this study was to determine the role of tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in the prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes mellitus without left ventricular systolic dysfunction or clinical evidence of heart failure in randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials using pooled meta-analysis techniques.
Methods:  Randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials of at least 12 months duration in patients with diabetes mellitus without left ventricular systolic dysfunction or heart failure who had experienced a prior cardiovascular event or were at high cardiovascular risk were selected. A total of 10 328 patients (43 517 patient-years) from four selected trials were used for meta-analysis. Relative risk estimations were made using data pooled from the selected trials and statistical significance was determined using the Chi-squared test (two-sided alpha error <0.05). The number of patients needed to treat was also calculated.
Results:  Tissue ACE inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular mortality by 14.9% (p = 0.022), myocardial infarction by 20.8% (p = 0.002) and the need for invasive coronary revascularization by 14% (p = 0.015) when compared to placebo. The risk of all-cause mortality also tended to be lower among patients randomized to tissue ACE inhibitors, whereas the risks of stroke and hospitalization for heart failure were not significantly affected. Treating about 65 patients with tissue ACE inhibitors for about 4.2 years would prevent one myocardial infarction, whereas treating about 85 patients would prevent one cardiovascular death.
Conclusion:  Pooled meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials suggests that tissue ACE inhibitors modestly reduce the risk of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death and tend to reduce overall mortality in diabetic patients without left ventricular systolic dysfunction or heart failure.     

Novel drugs for heart rate control in heart failure

In patients with heart failure, increased sympathetic activity is associated with a positive chronotropic stimulation leading to accelerated resting heart rate. Elevated heart rate (HR) is a risk factor for cardiovascular events, both in the general population and in patients with heart failure. Ivabradine is a pure HR-lowering agent, and it does not affect myocardial contractility, blood pressure, intracardiac conduction, or ventricular repolarization. In clinical trials such as BEAUTIFUL, CARVIVA HF, SHIFT, and INTENSIFY in patients with systolic left ventricular dysfunction, heart rate reduction with ivabradine brought positive outcomes. However, the results of the recent meta-analysis are rather neutral. In a diabetes mouse model of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), selective heart rate reduction by I_f inhibition improved vascular stiffness, left ventricular (LV) contractility, and diastolic function. However, EDIFY (Effect of ivabradine in patients with heart rate with preserved ejection fraction) trial show that the use of ivabradine in patients with HFpEF is not supported. The further clinical trials investigating the use of ivabradine in heart failure should be carried out.     

Hypertension: an important precursor of heart failure

Hypertension is an important risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Hypertension is associated with the development of congestive heart failure by way of left ventricular hypertrophy, with left ventricular dilatation and through myocardial ischemia and left ventricular damage. Reports on the natural history of untreated hypertension indicate that at least 50% of affected subjects develop congestive heart failure. Hypertension is an important precursor of heart failure, and still the most common risk factor for congestive heart failure in the population. In clinical trials, particularly in elderly patients, a reduction in the incidence of congestive heart failure has been observed. Despite increments in the use of antihypertensive drugs, mortality from congestive heart failure among the elderly is increasing. Moreover, several patients with hypertension are unaware, untreated and uncontrolled for the most important risk factor for congestive heart failure. For the primary prevention of heart failure, improvements in blood pressure control are of vast importance.     

Hypertension: an important precursor of heart failure

Hypertension is an important risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Hypertension is associated with the development of congestive heart failure by way of left ventricular hypertrophy, with left ventricular dilatation and through myocardial ischemia and left ventricular damage. Reports on the natural history of untreated hypertension indicate that at least 50% of affected subjects develop congestive heart failure. Hypertension is an important precursor of heart failure, and still the most common risk factor for congestive heart failure in the population. In clinical trials, particularly in elderly patients, a reduction in the incidence of congestive heart failure has been observed. Despite increments in the use of antihypertensive drugs, mortality from congestive heart failure among the elderly is increasing. Moreover, several patients with hypertension are unaware, untreated and uncontrolled for the most important risk factor for congestive heart failure. For the primary prevention of heart failure, improvements in blood pressure control are of vast importance.     

Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and cardiovascular disease: insights from prospective clinical trials

Evidence has accumulated that asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) is an endogenous competitive inhibitor of nitric oxide (NO) synthase. ADMA inhibits vascular NO production at concentrations found in pathophysiological conditions; it also causes local vasoconstriction when infused intra-arterially. ADMA is increased in the plasma of humans with hypercholesterolemia, atherosclerosis, hypertension, chronic renal failure, chronic heart failure, and other clinical conditions. Increased ADMA levels are associated with reduced NO synthesis as assessed by impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation or reduced NO metabolite levels. In several prospective and cross-sectional studies, ADMA has evolved as a marker of cardiovascular risk. Moreover, prospective clinical studies have suggested that it may play a role as a novel cardiovascular risk factor. Zoccali and coworkers were the first to show that elevated ADMA is associated with a three-fold increased risk of future severe cardiovascular events and mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Valkonen and coworkers demonstrated in a nested case-control study that elevated ADMA was associated with a four-fold increased risk for acute coronary events in clinically healthy, nonsmoking men. In patients with stable angina pectoris, preinterventional ADMA indicates the risk of developing restenosis or severe clinical events after coronary intervention. Furthermore, in humans with no underlying cardiovascular disease who are undergoing intensive care unit treatment, ADMA is a marker of the mortality risk. A number of additional prospective clinical trials are currently under way in diverse patient populations, among them individuals with congestive heart failure, cardiac transplantation patients, and patients with pulmonary hypertension. In summary, an increasing number of prospective clinical trials have shown that the association between elevated ADMA levels and major cardiovascular events and total mortality is robust and extends to diverse patient populations. However, we need to define more clearly in the future who will profit from ADMA determination, in order to use this novel risk marker as a more specific diagnostic tool.     

Sacubitril/Valsartan Off-Label Uses for Heart Failure

Sacubitril/valsartan is an angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor that the Food and Drug Administration has indicated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular hospitalization and death in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction below normal and with no specified ejection-fraction cut-off. However, clinically significant patient groups were excluded or minimally represented in sacubitril/valsartan's pivotal clinical trials. Clinicians often encounter scenarios in which a sacubitril/valsartan off-label use may be beneficial, but limited resources are available to evaluate the efficacy and safety in these patients. This state-of-the-art review describes contemporary literature for sacubitril/valsartan Food and Drug Administration off-label indications to help clinicians assess its appropriateness in these selected, clinically important groups of patients: those with acute decompensated heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, peripartum cardiomyopathy, chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy, adult congenital heart disease, cardiomyopathy in dialysis patients, right ventricular failure, or durable left ventricular assist device.     

Clinical trials update and cumulative meta-analyses from the American College of Cardiology: WATCH, SCD-HeFT, DINAMIT, CASINO, INSPIRE, STRATUS-US, RIO-Lipids and cardiac resynchronisation therapy in heart failure

This article continues a series of reports on recent research developments in the field of heart failure. Key presentations made at the American College of Cardiology meeting, held in New Orleans, Louisiana, USA in March 2004 are reported. These new data have been added to existing data in cumulative meta-analyses. The WATCH study randomised 1587 patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction to warfarin, aspirin or clopidogrel. The study showed no difference between the effects of these agents on mortality or myocardial infarction, but hospitalisations for heart failure were higher on aspirin (22.2%) compared to warfarin (16.1%). The SCD-HeFT study showed that ICD therapy reduced all-cause mortality at 5 years by 23% in patients with predominantly NYHA class II heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction, but amiodarone was ineffective. The DINAMIT study showed that ICD therapy was not beneficial in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after a recent MI, even in those with risk factors for arrhythmic death. In CASINO, levosimendan improved survival compared with dobutamine or placebo in patients with decompensated heart failure. INSPIRE showed that SPECT imaging can be used to assess risk early after acute MI safely and accurately. Rimonabant was shown to be safe and effective in treating the combined cardiovascular risk factors of smoking and obesity. An overview of new developments in cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) in heart failure is also reported.     

Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: risks, identification, and treatment

Risk factors of cardiovascular disease, such as hypertension, diabetes, and myocardial infarction, if left untreated, will increase the risk of the development of chronic heart failure. Much is known about the pathophysiology and effective treatments of chronic heart failure from left ventricular systolic dysfunction; however, little clinical trial evidence exists concerning benefits of treating patients with chronic heart failure and preserved systolic function, also known as left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Rather, an understanding of the pathophysiology and patient signs and symptoms has usually dictated choice of treatments. With the results of ongoing trials, as well as the Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM)-Preserved and the Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG) trials, clinical evidence is accumulating to support effective treatments in patients with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. The focus of this review is to discuss the risks of, identification of, and rationale for therapeutic choices being employed for treating left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and implications from studies that may support these choices.     

Left ventricular function in adult patients with atrial septal defect: implication for development of heart failure after transcatheter closure

Despite advances in device closure for atrial septal defect (ASD), post-closure heart failure observed in adult patients remains a clinical problem. Although right heart volume overload is the fundamental pathophysiology in ASD, the post-closure heart failure characterized by acute pulmonary congestion is likely because of age-related left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, which is manifested by acute volume loading with ASD closure. Aging also appears to play important roles in the pathophysiology of heart failure through several mechanisms other than diastolic dysfunction, including ventricular systolic and vascular stiffening and increased incidence of comorbidities that significantly affect cardiovascular function. Recent studies suggested that accurate assessment of preclosure diastolic function, such as test ASD occlusion, may help identify high-risk patients for post-closure heart failure. Anti–heart failure therapy before device closure or the use of fenestrated device appears to be effective in preventing post-closure heart failure in the high-risk patients. However, the long-term outcome of such patients remains to be elucidated. Future studies are warranted to construct an algorithm to identify and treat patients at high risk for heart failure after device closure of ASD.     

Clinical trials update from the American College of Cardiology meeting 2010: DOSE,ASPIRE, CONNECT,STICH, STOP‐AF,CABANA, RACE II,EVEREST II,ACCORD, and NAVIGATOR

This article provides information and a commentary on trials relevant to the pathophysiology, prevention and treatment of heart failure presented at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology held in March 2010. Unpublished reports should be considered as preliminary, since analyses may change in the final publication. Results from DOSE suggest that giving diuretics using a high‐dose, bolus strategy may be better than using lower doses or a continuous infusion for patients with acute decompensated heart failure. In the ASPIRE study, addition of aliskiren to standard therapy failed to attenuate left ventricular remodelling in post‐MI patients and was associated with more adverse events. In CONNECT, remote monitoring reduced the time from CRT‐D‐ or ICD‐detected events to clinical decision and this was associated with fewer clinic visits and shorter hospitalizations. An analysis from STICH testing the effects of surgical ventricular reconstruction showed no benefit in the sub‐group of patients who achieved a greater reduction in LV volume. STOP‐AF and CABANA did not provide convincing evidence of the effectiveness or safety of catheter ablation for the treatment of AF. RACE II suggests that lenient heart rate control might be as effective as strict rate control in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation. In EVEREST II, a catheter‐based mitral valve repair procedure using the MitraClip® system had similar efficacy to traditional surgery but with fewer short‐term adverse effects. Valsartan reduced progression to diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance but had no effect on cardiovascular events in NAVIGATOR. In ACCORD, strict blood pressure control failed to reduce the risk of overall cardiovascular events in high‐risk diabetic patients.     

The effect of gender on outcome in digitalis-treated heart failure patients

BACKGROUND: The use of digitalis is recommended for the treatment of heart failure to reduce hospitalization. Recent data suggest that digitalis treatment may adversely affect survival in women but not in men. We studied patients with left ventricular dysfunction enrolled in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) to determine whether there was a gender-based survival difference in patients treated with digitalis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Symptomatic (n = 2569) and asymptomatic (n = 4228) patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 0.35 were studied. Digitalis use was assessed at baseline and baseline demographic variables were catalogued and compared. A multivariate analysis, incorporating known covariates of risk for adverse cardiovascular events, was used to examine the association of digitalis with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, death from heart failure, and arrhythmic death, with, or without, worsening heart failure in women compared with men. Analysis for an interaction between digitalis and gender on mortality was also performed. No interaction between gender and digitalis treatment on survival was found, and there was no significant difference in the hazard ratios for men and women on digitalis either with respect to all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, heart failure mortality, or arrhythmic death with worsening heart failure. When mortality for arrhythmic death without worsening heart failure was adjusted for the probability of being treated with digitalis (propensity analysis), women fared better than men. CONCLUSION: Data from the SOLVD trials suggest that digitalis treatment of heart failure does not result in a difference in survival between men and women. Because a randomized trial to definitively answer the question is unlikely, and perhaps inappropriate, examination of other heart failure populations for a gender-digitalis interaction is indicated.     

Hyponatremia and vasopressin antagonism in congestive heart failure

In a national heart failure registry, hyponatremia (serum sodium < 130 mEq/L) was initially reported in 5% of patients and considered a risk factor for increased morbidity and mortality. In a chronic heart failure study, serum sodium level on admission predicted an increased length of stay for cardiovascular causes and increased mortality within 60 days of discharge. Hyponatremia in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) is associated with a higher mortality rate. Also, by monitoring and increasing serum sodium levels during hospitalization for CHF, patient outcomes may improve. This review describes the pathophysiology of hyponatremia in relation to CHF, including the mechanism of action of vasopressin receptors in the kidney, and assesses the preclinical and clinical trials of vasopressin receptor antagonists--agents recently developed to treat hyponatremia. In hospitalized patients with CHF, hyponatremia plays a major role in poor outcomes. Vasopressin receptor antagonists have been shown to be safe and effective in clinical trials in patients with hyponatremia.     

Prediction of 6 months left ventricular dilatation after myocardial infarction in relation to cardiac morbidity and mortality. Application of a new dilatation model to GISSI-3 data.

AIMS: To predict the long-term left ventricular volume index early after myocardial infarction and to investigate the relationship between long-term left ventricular dilatation risk and clinical outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: By applying a previously developed dilatation model, we predicted the 6-month left ventricular volume index early after myocardial infarction (median 9 days) in 13,679 GISSI-3 patients, to identify patients at high risk of long-term left ventricular dilatation. The left ventricular systolic and diastolic volume indexes at 6 months were predicted with r=0.72 and r=0.68, respectively, in the subgroup of patients in whom a pre-discharge echo was available (n=7842). Patients predicted to be at risk for long-term left ventricular dilatation had an increased risk of mortality (RR 1.87, 95% CI: 1.48 to 2.36) and heart failure at 6 months (RR 2.59, 95% CI:2.04 to 3.28), but no increased risk of reinfarction at 6 months (RR 1.12, 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.45) or of angina pectoris (RR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.95 to 1.20). CONCLUSION: Our prediction of long-term left ventricular dilatation, obtained by applying our new dilatation model in over 13,000 GISSI-3 patients, correlated well with mortality and heart failure after myocardial infarction. Therefore, our new dilatation model may contribute to more efficient risk stratification early after myocardial infarction.     

Clinical trials update from the American College of Cardiology 2009: ADMIRE‐HF,PRIMA, STICH,REVERSE, IRIS,partial ventricular support,FIX‐HF‐5, vagal stimulation,REVIVAL‐3, pre‐RELAX‐AHF,ACTIVE‐A,HF‐ACTION,JUPITER, AURORA,and OMEGA

This article provides information and a commentary on trials relevant to the pathophysiology, prevention and treatment of heart failure presented at the American College of Cardiology meeting in 2009. Unpublished reports should be considered as preliminary, since analyses may change in the final publication. ¹²³I‐mIBG myocardial scintigraphy was a good predictor of mortality in patients with heart failure in ADMIRE‐HF. In PRIMA, use of individualized target NT‐proBNP levels failed to improve outcomes compared with usual care in patients hospitalized with symptomatic heart failure. In the STICH trial, additional ventricular reconstruction surgery failed to improve outcomes in patients with ischaemic heart failure undergoing CABG. Cardiac resynchronization therapy may modify disease progression in patients with mild heart failure, according to data from REVERSE. Implantation of a defibrillator early after MI in high‐risk patients in the IRIS study failed to improve outcomes compared with usual care. Cardiac contractility modulation showed some beneficial effects on symptoms and exercise capacity in the unblinded FIX‐HF‐5 study. Data from pre‐RELAX‐AHF show that relaxin may have potential as a treatment for acute heart failure. HF‐ACTION showed that patients who complied with an exercise training regime achieved a better outcome, although this may be confounded by the ability of patients with a good prognosis to exercise for longer.     

Vascular effects of systemic hypertension.

Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, including coronary artery disease (CAD), stroke, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, renal failure, and aortic aneurysms. It is also a potent promoter of atherosclerosis. Observational studies have shown a linear relationship between a wide range of blood pressures and the risk for CAD and stroke. Clinical trials have indicated that hypertension reduction leads to the predicted reduction in stroke incidence, but that CAD incidence is affected to a lesser extent than predicted. The modest effect of traditional antihypertensive drugs on CAD may be due to several factors, including failure to reverse well-established coronary atherosclerosis, particularly if multiple risk factors are not reduced as well. Metabolic side effects of antihypertensive drugs or excessive lowering of blood pressure leading to inadequate myocardial perfusion, especially in patients with increased left ventricular (LV) mass, also may play important roles. Hypertension is a major cause of renal failure, particularly in black males, but control of the hypertension does not necessarily prevent deterioration of renal function. Increased glomerular pressure is thought to play a causative role in the development of renal failure in hypertensive and diabetic patients. Antihypertensive drugs may have a direct effect on the arterial wall, which may be independent of their antihypertensive action. Beta-adrenergic blockers, calcium antagonists, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors inhibit the development of vascular lesions in response to hypercholesterolemia or to iatrogenic balloon injury, but the clinical importance of these observations remains to be determined.     

Which drug for what patient with heart failure, and when?

Congestive heart failure is emerging as an important public health problem because of its frequency and high mortality. Over the past decade, a number of clinical trials have been launched in a systematic attempt to determine an optimal therapeutic strategy for the treatment of heart failure. There appears to be a trend to begin treatment with both a diuretic and a vasodilator regimen in patients with symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction. Converting enzyme inhibitors have been shown to clearly benefit patients with class IV heart failure. The role of digitalis, other inotropic agents, beta-blockers, partial beta-agonists and antiarrhythmic agents is still evolving, but several clinical trials of these agents have been recently launched or are in the planning stages. Patients with symptomless left ventricular dysfunction are at risk to develop heart failure. One attractive hypothesis being tested is that preventive therapy with converting enzyme inhibitors may prevent progressive cardiac dilatation and thereby improve survival in this important reservoir of patients. Until the results of these numerous clinical trials are published, physicians should reserve judgement regarding the undefined efficacy of various investigational agents used in the treatment of heart failure and use their experience and judgement when planning a therapeutic strategy for their individual patients.