Phenobarbital pharmacokinetics in old age: a case-matched evaluation based on therapeutic drug monitoring data

PURPOSE: To assess the influence of aging on the pharmacokinetics of phenobarbital (PB) at steady state in patients receiving long-term therapy. METHODS: Serum PB concentrations from the database of the therapeutic drug monitoring service of a large neurological hospital were used to calculate apparent clearance values (CL/F) in 224 patients aged 65 years and older (mean, 73 +/- 6.1 years). CL/F values in these patients were compared with those determined in an equal number of controls aged 20 to 50 years (mean, 35.7 +/- 7.9 years) and matched for gender, body weight, and type of anticonvulsant comedication. Correlations of CL/F with age, body weight, gender, and comedication also were explored within each age group. RESULTS: PB CL/F values were significantly lower in elderly patients than in controls (3.2 +/- 0.8 vs. 4.1 +/- 1.2 ml/h/kg; p < 0.0001). Age was identified as a statistically significant predictor of CL/F at multiple regression analysis, but it accounted for only a modest component of the interindividual pharmacokinetic variation. Comedication with carbamazepine (CBZ) and phenytoin (PHT) was associated with a moderate decrease in PB CL/F, which reached statistical significance in the elderly group (p < 0.01 for CBZ comedication; p < 0.001 for PHT comedication). CONCLUSIONS: Aging is associated with a significant decrease in PB clearance, which might be related to a reduction in glomerular filtration rate or diminished drug-metabolizing capacity in the liver or both. Because of this, older patients will require lower dosages to achieve serum PB concentrations comparable with those found in nonelderly adults.     

The influence of old age and enzyme inducing comedication on the pharmacokinetics of valproic acid at steady-state: A case-matched evaluation based on therapeutic drug monitoring data

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of aging on the pharmacokinetics of valproic acid (VPA) at steady-state and on the susceptibility of VPA metabolism to enzyme induction by antiepileptic comedication. METHODS: The database of the therapeutic drug monitoring service of a large neurological hospital was searched to identify patients aged > or = 65 years stabilized on VPA therapy. Apparent VPA oral clearance (CL/F) calculated for each elderly patient was compared with that determined in an equal number of VPA-treated controls aged 20-50 years and matched for gender, body weight and antiepileptic drug (AED) comedication. RESULTS: A total of 71 elderly patients aged 70.0+/-4.4 years, including 20 receiving enzyme inducing AEDs, was included in the main evaluation. In the absence of enzyme inducing comedication, VPA CL/F in the elderly was similar to that found in non-elderly controls (9.7+/-4.6 versus 10.2+/-4.6mlh(-1)kg(-1)). Elderly patients on enzyme inducing comedication, on the other hand, had lower CL/F values than enzyme induced younger controls (11.7+/-5.4 versus 16.0+/-6.3mlh(-1)kg(-1), p<0.05). Since VPA CL/F is known to increase with increasing dosage, a lower VPA dosage in elderly patients comedicated with enzyme inducers compared with controls may have contributed to differences in CL/F between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of enzyme inducing comedication, VPA clearance in the elderly was comparable to that observed in controls. VPA clearance in elderly patients receiving enzyme inducing AEDs was lower than in controls, the difference being probably due to an influence of age as well as to the fact that mean VPA dosage was lower in these patients than in controls. Since our measurements of clearance were based on total serum VPA concentrations and VPA binding to plasma proteins is known to be reduced in old age, it is likely that the clearance of unbound, pharmacologically active, VPA was decreased to an important extent in the elderly, presumably as a result of a decline in drug metabolizing capacity.     

Antiepileptic drugs--best practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring: a position paper by the subcommission on therapeutic drug monitoring, ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies

Although no randomized studies have demonstrated a positive impact of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) on clinical outcome in epilepsy, evidence from nonrandomized studies and everyday clinical experience does indicate that measuring serum concentrations of old and new generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) can have a valuable role in guiding patient management provided that concentrations are measured with a clear indication and are interpreted critically, taking into account the whole clinical context. Situations in which AED measurements are most likely to be of benefit include (1) when a person has attained the desired clinical outcome, to establish an individual therapeutic concentration which can be used at subsequent times to assess potential causes for a change in drug response; (2) as an aid in the diagnosis of clinical toxicity; (3) to assess compliance, particularly in patients with uncontrolled seizures or breakthrough seizures; (4) to guide dosage adjustment in situations associated with increased pharmacokinetic variability (e.g., children, the elderly, patients with associated diseases, drug formulation changes); (5) when a potentially important pharmacokinetic change is anticipated (e.g., in pregnancy, or when an interacting drug is added or removed); (6) to guide dose adjustments for AEDs with dose-dependent pharmacokinetics, particularly phenytoin.     

Clinical value of therapeutic drug monitoring for levetiracetam in pediatric patients with epilepsy

PurposeTo identify pediatric patients who require therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of levetiracetam (LEV).MethodsWe retrospectively investigated 2413 routine therapeutic drug monitoring data on serum LEV concentration from 1398 pediatric patients (age, 0–15 years). Samples were grouped by age (infants, < 1 year; preschool children, 1–5 years; primary school children, 6–11 years; and adolescents, 12–15 years), and the LEV concentration-to-dose (CD) ratio was calculated.ResultsThe mean CD ratio was highest in adolescents (analysis of variance, p < 0.001); 22.5 % and 15.7 % higher in adolescents than in preschool children and school children, respectively (Scheffé test, p < 0.001); and higher in infants than in preschool children. Preschool children had the lowest ratio and tended to show an increase in the ratio from age 2 to 5 years. Use of enzyme-inducing antiseizure medication reduced the CD ratio by 6.1 % in infants, 12.2 % in preschool children, 5.9 % in primary school children, and 9.4 % in adolescents. The mean CD ratio was 2.7 %, 26.9 %, and 39.3 % higher in preschool children, primary school children, and adolescents with defined chronic kidney disease (CKD) than in the respective age group of patients without CKD. The therapeutic concentration range for a long-term LEV therapy was 11 to 32 μg/mL.ConclusionsLEV pharmacokinetics are significantly different between infant and preschool children, so TDM of LEV is clinically useful in these patients. In pediatric patients at higher risk for CKD, glomerular filtration rate and LEV levels should be carefully monitored.     

Cardiac function and antiepileptic drug treatment in the elderly: A comparison between lamotrigine and sustained-release carbamazepine

Purpose: To investigate the comparative effects of carbamazepine (CBZ) and lamotrigine (LTG) on electrocardiography (ECG) parameters in elderly patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Methods: The study was conducted in the Norwegian subcohort (n = 108) of an international randomized double‐blind 40‐week trial, which compared the efficacy and tolerability of LTG and sustained‐release CBZ in patients aged 65 and older with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Target maintenance doses were 400 mg/day for CBZ and 100 mg/day for LTG, with adjustments based on clinical response. Patients with significant unpaced atrioventricular (AV) conduction defect were excluded. Resting 12‐lead ECG recordings were made under standardized conditions at pretreatment (baseline) and at the 40‐week study visit (treatment visit). Changes in QRS interval (primary endpoint), heart rate (HR), PQ, and QTc (HR‐corrected QT) intervals were assessed and compared between groups. Results: Of the 108 patients randomized, 33 discontinued prematurely because of adverse events (n = 24, none of which was cardiac) or other reasons (n = 9), and 15 were nonevaluable due to incomplete ECG data. None of the assessed ECG parameters differed significantly between groups at baseline. No significant ECG changes were recorded between baseline and treatment visit for QRS duration and QTc intervals, whereas HR fell and PQ intervals increased slightly on both treatments. However, there were no differences between groups in changes from baseline to treatment visit. There were no significant relationships between individual ECG changes and serum drug concentrations, except for QTc intervals, which decreased slightly with increasing CBZ concentrations. The proportion of patients with ECG parameters outside the normal range at treatment visit was similar to that recorded at baseline. Discussion: Clinically significant ECG changes are not common during treatment with CBZ or LTG in elderly patients with no preexisting significant AV conduction defects.     

Video-EEG monitoring in the elderly: a review of 94 patients

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the utility and results of video-EEG monitoring in elderly patients. There is an increased incidence of epilepsy in the elderly population. Few studies have assessed the characteristics of epileptic and nonepileptic seizures in this age group. Diagnostic evaluation with video-EEG monitoring is a means to distinguish these different types of events. METHODS: The authors reviewed all patients aged 60 years and older who were admitted to the epilepsy monitoring unit at Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center from January 21, 1991, to April 12, 1999. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients and 99 patient admissions were identified, accounting for 8% of all admissions. The average age was 70 years, and the mean length of stay was 3.8 days. Typical events were recorded in 75 of the 99 patient admissions. A total of 118 seizures was recorded in 46 patients, and 98 nonepileptic events were seen in 27 patients. Of the patients with nonepileptic events, 13 had psychogenic seizures. The majority of patients with nonepileptic events were taking antiepileptic medication. Whereas 76% of the patients with epileptic events had interictal epileptiform discharges, 26% of the patients with nonepileptic events had epileptiform discharges as well. CONCLUSIONS: Video-EEG monitoring in the elderly leads to a definitive diagnosis in the majority of patients in a relatively short time. Interictal recordings are inadequate in determining the nature of paroxysmal events. Nonepileptic events are common in the elderly, including psychogenic seizures, and these are often misdiagnosed and mistreated as epileptic seizures.     

TDM in psychiatry and neurology: A comprehensive summary of the consensus guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring in neuropsychopharmacology,update 2017; a tool for clinicians*

Objectives: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) combines the quantification of drug concentrations in blood, pharmacological interpretation and treatment guidance. TDM introduces a precision medicine tool in times of increasing awareness of the need for personalized treatment. In neurology and psychiatry, TDM can guide pharmacotherapy for patient subgroups such as children, adolescents, pregnant women, elderly patients, patients with intellectual disabilities, patients with substance use disorders, individuals with pharmacokinetic peculiarities and forensic patients. Clear indications for TDM include lack of clinical response in the therapeutic dose range, assessment of drug adherence, tolerability issues and drug–drug interactions.

Methods: Based upon existing literature, recommended therapeutic reference ranges, laboratory alert levels, and levels of recommendation to use TDM for dosage optimization without specific indications, conversion factors, factors for calculation of dose-related drug concentrations and metabolite-to-parent ratios were calculated.

Results: This summary of the updated consensus guidelines by the TDM task force of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie offers the practical and theoretical knowledge for the integration of TDM as part of pharmacotherapy with neuropsychiatric agents into clinical routine.

Conclusions: The present guidelines for TDM application for neuropsychiatric agents aim to assist clinicians in enhancing safety and efficacy of treatment.     

A multicenter randomized controlled trial on the clinical impact of therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. The Italian TDM Study Group in Epilepsy

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical impact of monitoring serum concentrations of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. METHODS: One-hundred eighty patients with partial or idiopathic generalized nonabsence epilepsy, aged 6 to 65 years, requiring initiation of treatment with carbamazepine (CBZ), valproate (VPA), phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PB), or primidone (PRM) were randomly allocated to two groups according to an open, prospective parallel-group design. In one group, dosage was adjusted to achieve serum AED concentration within a target range (10-20 microg/ml for PHT, 15-40 microg/ml for PB, 4-11 microg/ml for CBZ, and 40-100 microg/ml for VPA), whereas in the other group, dosage was adjusted on clinical grounds. Patients were followed up for 24 months or until a change in therapeutic strategy was clinically indicated. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics did not differ between the two groups. Most patients with partial epilepsy were treated with CBZ, whereas generalized epilepsies were most commonly managed with PB or VPA. PHT was used only in a small minority of patients. A total of 116 patients completed 2-year follow-up, and there were no differences in exit rate from any cause between the monitored group and the control group. The proportion of assessable patients with mean serum drug levels outside the target range (mostly below range) during the first 6 months of the study was 8% in the monitored group compared with 25% in the control group (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the monitored group and the control group with respect to patients achieving 12-month remission (60% vs. 61%), patients remaining seizure free since initiation of treatment (38% vs. 41%), and time to first seizure or 12-month remission. Frequency of adverse effects was almost identical in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Only a small minority of patients were treated with PHT, the drug for which serum concentration measurements are most likely to be useful. With the AEDs most commonly used in this study, early implementation of serum AED level monitoring did not improve overall therapeutic outcome. and the majority of patients could be satisfactorily treated by adjusting dose on clinical grounds. Monitoring the serum levels of these drugs in selected patients and in special situations is likely to be more rewarding than routine measurements in a large clinic population.     

Antiepileptic drug therapy and its management in sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: a case-control study

PURPOSE: Because frequent seizures constitute a major risk factor for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), the treatment with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may play a role for the occurrence of SUDEP. We used data from routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to study the association between various aspects of AED treatment and the risk of SUDEP. METHODS: A nested case-control study was based on a cohort consisting of 6,880 patients registered in the Stockholm County In Ward Care Register with a diagnosis of epilepsy. Fifty-seven SUDEP cases, and 171 controls, living epilepsy patients, were selected from the cohort. Clinical data including data on TDM were collected through medical record review. RESULTS: The relative risk (RR) of SUDEP was 3.7 (95% CI, 1.0-13.1) for outpatients who had no TDM compared with those who had one to three TDMs during the 2 years of observation. RR was 9.5 (1.4-66.0) if carbamazepine (CBZ) plasma levels at the last TDM were above and not within the common target range (20-40 microM). High CBZ levels were associated with a higher risk in patients receiving polytherapy and in those with frequent dose changes. Although the subgroup of patients with high CBZ levels was small (six cases of 33 with CBZ therapy), and the result should be interpreted with caution, no similar associations were demonstrated for phenytoin plasma levels and risk of SUDEP. No association was found between SUDEP risk and within-patient variation in AED levels over time. CONCLUSIONS: Polytherapy, frequent dose changes, and high CBZ levels as identified risk factors for SUDEP all point to the risks associated with an unstable severe epilepsy. It is unclear whether high CBZ levels per se represent a risk factor or just reflect other unidentified aspects of a severe epilepsy. Our results, however, prompt further detailed analyses of the possible role of AEDs in SUDEP in larger cohorts and suggest that reasonable monitoring of the drug therapy may be useful to reduce risks.     

Therapeutic drug monitoring for optimizing amisulpride therapy in patients with schizophrenia

Amisulpride is a clinically effective antipsychotic drug in a broad dose range with low propensity for extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). Daily doses and plasma levels of amisulpride were analyzed within a large-scale therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) survey to find plasma level ranges for optimized treatment under naturalistic conditions. Data of 378 schizophrenic patients treated with amisulpride (100-1550 mg) were included (40% female). Amisulpride plasma levels were analyzed at steady state; assessment comprised improvement (CGI-I) and side-effects, particularly EPS. For detection of cut-off values regarding non-response or EPS, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were applied and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated. Amisulpride daily doses (594+/-262 mg) and plasma levels (315+/-277 ng/ml) were significantly correlated (r=0.53; P<0.0001). Patients with non-response to amisulpride (8.9%) had significantly (P<0.05) lower plasma levels (248+/-291 ng/ml) than patients with at least moderate improvement (316+/-253 ng/ml) despite comparable amisulpride doses (628+/-253 vs. 590+/-263 mg). Patients with EPS (14.6%) had significantly (P<0.05) higher amisulpride plasma levels (377+/-290 ng/ml) than patients without EPS (305+/-274 ng/ml) despite similar doses in both groups (595+/-266 vs. 594+/-246 mg). ROC analyses revealed significant predictive properties of amisulpride plasma levels (P<0.05) for non-response (AUC=0.65+/-0.05) and EPS (AUC=0.62+/-0.05), respectively. Daily amisulpride doses did not significantly predict non-response or EPS. Optimal amisulpride plasma level values to avoid non-response and EPS were 100 or 320 ng/ml, respectively. Analysis of clinical utility revealed that blood levels must be analyzed in 7 patients until one patient benefits from the TDM procedure by avoiding non-response or EPS. Although our results were mainly explorative, TDM of amisulpride seems very useful for clinical decision making.     

Controversies in Blood-level Monitoring: Reexamining Its Role in the Treatment of Epilepsy

Summary: This article reexamines the role of blood-level monitoring (therapeutic drug monitoring, TDM) of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the current treatment of epilepsy and identifies situations in which TDM can be useful. Basic pharmaco-kinetic and pharmacodynamic principles are reviewed, with specific emphasis on kinetics of absorption/distribution/metabolism, elimination half-life, time to steady state, and plasma drug concentrations. The relationship between AED intensity of effect (pharmacodynamics) and plasma concentration (pharmacokinetics) is expressed mathematically, examined in the context of the major old and new AEDs, and integrated with a historical look at the role of TDM. Situations in which TDM can be useful in the modern treatment of epilepsy are presented and discussed. For both older and newer AEDs, TDM is useful in six clinical situations: establishing "baseline" effective concentrations, evaluating potential causes for lack of efficacy, evaluating potential causes for toxicity, evaluating potential causes for loss of efficacy, judging "room to move' or when to change AEDs, and minimizing predictable problems. TDM remains a valuable tool in the modern treatment of epilepsy. It can be selectively and appropriately utilized to help maximize seizure control and minimize side effects if levels are obtained in response to a patient-specific pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic issue or problem.     

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction of levetiracetam on carbamazepine, valproic acid, topiramate, and lamotrigine in children with epilepsy

PURPOSE: To determine whether levetiracetam (LEV) affects plasma concentrations of carbamazepine, valproic acid, topiramate, and lamotrigine in children with epilepsy. METHODS: The potential for interaction of LEV with other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) was assessed using plasma drug levels obtained in a randomized placebo-controlled phase III trial of adjunctive LEV in children receiving one or two concomitant AEDs. Multiple plasma AED levels at baseline and during adjunctive treatment with LEV or placebo were compared by repeated measures analysis of covariance and mean concentration ratios (treatment/baseline) were estimated with their 90% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: The study population included 187 children receiving any concomitant AED alone or in combination. The geometric mean concentrations at baseline and during LEV treatment were carbamazepine 8.4 microg/ml versus 8.1 microg/ml (coefficient of variation, CV = 30%; n = 35); valproic acid 83.8 versus 82.5 microg/ml (CV = 38%; n = 23); topiramate 7.3 versus 7.2 microg/ml (CV = 82%; n = 28); lamotrigine 8.2 versus 7.7 microg/ml (CV = 62%; n = 22). For each AED, the mean concentration ratios (LEV/baseline) and their 90% CIs showed that AED concentrations were unaffected by concomitant LEV administration. No differences were observed between LEV and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: LEV does not affect plasma concentrations of carbamazepine, valproic acid, topiramate, or lamotrigine in children with epilepsy.     

Transient improvement after brief antiepileptic drug withdrawal in the epilepsy monitoring unit—possible relationship to AED tolerance

Purpose: A drug holiday seems to produce seizure interval prolongation (SIP) after reinstitution of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). This effect was demonstrated mainly with carbamazepine. We evaluated SIP with newer AEDs and tested the relationship of SIP to history of AED tolerance. Methods: We prospectively studied patients with refractory epilepsy admitted to the Vanderbilt epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) over a period of 12 months. We included only patients on levetiracetam, lamotrigine, or oxcarbazepine who had their AEDs withdrawn on admission and reinstituted without change upon discharge. We defined SIP as the interval from EMU discharge to first seizure minus the interval between the last two seizures before EMU admission. Results: A total of 43 patients completed the study; 15 were on monotherapy. SIP was greater than zero in this patient group (p < 0.0001), with a mean prolongation of 19.4 ± 28.0 days. The average SIP was higher (p = 0.01) in patients on monotherapy (29.7 ± 23.8 days) than patients on polytherapy (13.9 ± 29.0 days). SIP tended to be greater in patients with a prior history of AED tolerance (25.7 ± 36.8 days) compared to patient with no prior history of AED tolerance (14.0 ± 16.3 days). Discussion: SIP does occur after brief AED withdrawal. This effect is greater in patients on monotherapy and tends to be larger in patients with a history of AED tolerance. The SIP effect may be related to the phenomenon of tolerance, clinically seen as resistance to AED therapeutic effect.     

A comparative study of the effect of carbamazepine and valproic acid on the pharmacokinetics and metabolic profile of topiramate at steady state in patients with epilepsy

PURPOSE: To compare the influence of enzyme-inducing comedication and valproic acid (VPA) on topiramate (TPM) pharmacokinetics and metabolism at steady state. METHODS: Three groups were assessed: (a) patients receiving TPM mostly alone (control group, n =13); (b) patients receiving TPM with carbamazepine (CBZ; n = 13); and (c) patients receiving TPM with VPA (n = 12). TPM and its metabolites were assayed in plasma and urine by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). RESULTS: No significant differences were found in TPM oral (CL/F) and renal (CL(r)) clearance between the VPA group and the control group. Mean TPM CL/F and CL(r) were higher in the CBZ group than in controls (2.1 vs. 1.2 L/h and 1.1 vs. 0.6L/h, respectively; p < 0.05). In all groups, the urinary recovery of unchanged TPM was extensive and accounted for 42-52% of the dose (p > 0.05). Urinary recovery of 2,3-O-des-isopropylidene-TPM (2,3-diol-TPM) accounted for 3.5% of the dose in controls, 2.2% in the VPA group (p > 0.05), and 13% in the CBZ group (p < 0.05). The recovery of 10-hydroxy-TPM (10-OH-TPM) was twofold higher in the CBZ group than in controls, but it accounted for only <2% of the dose. The plasma concentrations of TPM metabolites were severalfold lower than those of the parent drug. CONCLUSIONS: Renal excretion remains a major route of TPM elimination, even in the presence of enzyme induction. The twofold increase in TPM-CL/F in patients taking CBZ can be ascribed, at least in part, to stimulation of the oxidative pathways leading to formation of 2,3-diol-TPM and 10-OH-TPM. VPA was not found to have any clinically significant influence on TPM pharmacokinetic and metabolic profiles.     

A comparative pharmacokinetic study in healthy volunteers of the effect of carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine on cyp3a4

PURPOSE: Carbamazepine (CBZ) and oxcarbazepine (OXCZ) are well-known inducers of drug metabolism via CYP3A4. Indirect interaction studies and clinical experience suggest that CBZ has a stronger potential in this regard than OXCZ. However this has never been subject to a direct comparative study. We performed a study in healthy volunteers to investigate the relative inductive effect of CBZ and OXCZ on CYP3A4 activity using the metabolism of quinidine as a biomarker reaction. METHODS: Ten healthy, male volunteers participated in an open, randomized crossover study consisting of two periods separated by a 4-week wash-out period. The subjects received 1200 mg oral OXCZ daily for 17 days and 800 mg oral CBZ for 17 days. A single 200 mg oral dose of quinidine was administered at baseline and following administration of CBZ and OXCZ. Outcome parameters were the formation clearance of 3-hydroxyquinidine dose and the ratio of the AUCs of 3-hydroxyquinidine to quinidine. RESULTS: Formation clearance of 3-hydroxyquinidine was increased by means of 89% (CI: 36-164; p=0.0022) and 181% (CI: 120-260, p<0.0001) after treatment with OXCZ and CBZ, respectively, compared to baseline. The relative inductive effect of CBZ was 46% higher than for OXCZ. AUC ratio increased by means of 161% (CI: 139-187, p<0.0001) (OXCZ) and 222% (CI: 192-257, p<0.0001) (CBZ). Quinidine Cmax decreased by means of 29% (CI: 16-40, p=0.0018) (OXCZ) and 33% (CI: 18-45, p=0.0020) (CBZ). T1/2 decreased by means of 12% (CI: 6-17, p<0.0014) (OXCZ) and 32% (CI: 25-38, p<0.0001) (CBZ). tmax was not changed in either period. CONCLUSION: We confirm a clinically significant inductive effect of both OXCZ and CBZ. The inductive effect of CBZ was about 46% higher than that of OXCZ, a difference that may be of clinical relevance.     

基于流程化沟通模式的健康教育对老年患者视频脑电图监测成功率及配合率的影响

目的对老年患者基于流程化沟通模式的健康教育下进行视频脑电图(VEEG)监测,探讨此模式对此类患者监测成功率及主动配合率的影响。方法选择2017年9月-2019年9月因疑似癫痫、脑炎等疾病需在遂宁市中心医院接受VEEG监测的患者118例进行研究(患者年龄61~73岁;男54例,女64例)。采用随机数字表法将患者分为2组,每组各59例。A组行常规护理,B组在此基础上加以基于流程化沟通模式的健康教育。对比两组患者监测成功率、负性情绪、主动配合率及护理满意度。结果B组脑电监测总成功效率为86.44%,显著高于A组的76.27%(P<0.05)。护理干预后两组患者焦虑、抑郁维度得分均显著下降,但B组下降幅度更大(P<0.05)。B组患者主动配合率、护理满意度均显著高于A组(P<0.05)。结论基于流程化沟通模式的健康教育较常规护理能显著提高老年患者VEEG监测成功率,缓解其负性情绪,提高主动配合率及护理满意度。     

Interlaboratory variability in the quantification of new generation antiepileptic drugs based on external quality assessment data

PURPOSE: To assess interlaboratory variability in the determination of serum levels of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). METHODS: Lyophilised serum samples containing clinically relevant concentrations of felbamate (FBM), gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), the monohydroxy derivative of oxcarbazepine (OCBZ; MHD), tiagabine (TGB), topiramate (TPM), and vigabatrin (VGB) were distributed monthly among 70 laboratories participating in the international Heathcontrol External Quality Assessment Scheme (EQAS). Assay results returned over a 15-month period were evaluated for precision and accuracy. RESULTS: The most frequently measured compound was LTG (65), followed by MHD (39), GBP (19), TPM (18), VGB (15), FBM (16), and TGB (8). High-performance liquid chromatography was the most commonly used assay technique for all drugs except for TPM, for which two thirds of laboratories used a commercial immunoassay. For all assay methods combined, precision was <11% for MHD, FBM, TPM, and LTG, close to 15% for GBP and VGB, and as high as 54% for TGB (p < 0.001). Mean accuracy values were <10% for all drugs other than TGB, for which measured values were on average 13.9% higher than spiked values, with a high variability around the mean (45%). No differences in precision and accuracy were found between methods, except for TPM, for which gas chromatography showed poorer accuracy compared with immunoassay and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. CONCLUSIONS: With the notable exception of TGB, interlaboratory variability in the determination of new AEDs was comparable to that reported with older-generation agents. Poor assay performance is related more to individual operators than to the intrinsic characteristics of the method applied. Participation in an EQAS scheme is recommended to ensure adequate control of assay variability in therapeutic drug monitoring.     

Impact of Valproate and Phenytoin on Cognitive Function in Elderly Patients: Results of a Single-Blind Randomized Comparative Study

Summary: Thirty-eight patients (median age 77 years; range 62–88 years) with elderly-onset seizures were entered into a single-blind, randomized study designed to compare the impact of phenytoin (PHT) and valproate (VPA) on cognitive function. A stratified minimization program matched the two groups for age, sex, and seizure type. Attention, concentration, psychomotor speed, and memory were assessed twice before treatment (to minimize practice effects), at 6 weeks and (for patients remaining in the study) at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year by an extensive battery of psychologic tests. Changes in cognitive function were minor, and some tended toward improvement. Contrary to expectation, there was little difference between PHT and VPA with regard to impact on cognitive function. Frequent noncognitive adverse effects were reported. Thus, we did not replicate the findings of previous literature. We conclude that antiepileptic drug (AED) monotherapy as used in our trial did not produce significant adverse cognitive effects. The choice of AED in the elderly may therefore be more influenced by consideration of other adverse effects.