Long-term outcome after hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Purpose

The aim of this study was to elucidate the long-term outcome after hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance in a large number of Japanese patients.

Methods

We studied the biochemical, virologic, histologic, and prolonged prognoses of 231 Japanese patients with HBsAg seroclearance (median follow-up, 6.5 years). Serum alanine aminotransferase, serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) markers, liver histology, and clinical aspects were monitored. HBV-DNA levels were measured with the qualitative polymerase chain reaction assay. The mean age of patients with HBsAg seroclearance was 52 years.

Results

After HBsAg seroclearance, 203 patients (87.9%) had normal alanine aminotransferase levels 1 year after HBsAg seroclearance. HBV-DNA showed positive results in 4 patients (1.7%) 1 year after HBsAg seroclearance. Thirteen patients were examined for histologic changes of the liver after HBsAg seroclearance. All patients showed marked improvement of necroinflammation of the liver, but only 2 of the 13 patients showed no liver fibrosis. Liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma did not develop in any of the 164 patients without evidence of liver cirrhosis at the time of HBsAg seroclearance. Hepatocellular carcinoma developed in 2 of the 67 patients with liver cirrhosis at the time of HBsAg seroclearance. During the observation period, 15 patients died. However, the cause of death of these 15 patients was not related to liver disease, such as hepatocellular carcinoma, decompensated liver cirrhosis, and rupture of esophageal varices.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that HBsAg seroclearance confers favorable long-term outcomes in patients without hepatocellular carcinoma or decompensated liver cirrhosis at the time of HBsAg seroclearance     

Viral determinants predicting hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance in HIV‐/HBV‐coinfected patients

The aim of this retrospective study was the identification of clinically useful viral determinants for the prediction of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance and sustained virological response in hepatitis B virus/human immunodeficiency virus (HBV‐/HIV)‐coinfected patients receiving HBV‐active combined antiretroviral therapy (cART). Quantification of HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA before and after initiation of HBV‐active cART in a cohort of 59 HIV‐/HBV‐coinfected patients was performed. Calculations of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and Kaplan–Meier analysis were used for the identification of predictors of HBsAg seroclearance for HBeAg‐positive [HBeAg(+); n = 36] and HBeAg‐negative [HBeAg(−);n = 23] patients. HBeAg(+) patients with an HBsAg on‐treatment decline ≥1 log IU/mL per year achieved higher HBsAg loss rates (P = 0.0294), whereas the quantification of HBeAg had no predictive value for HBsAg seroclearance. Among HBeAg(−) patients, a pretreatment baseline cut‐off level of HBsAg ≤100 IU/mL was highly predictive for HBsAg seroclearance. No significant influence of the HBV genotype on HBsAg seroclearance was observed among the entire cohort. Quantitative determination of HBsAg provides a clinically useful viral parameter for the prediction of HBsAg seroclearance both in HBeAg(+) and HBeAg(−) HIV‐/HBV‐coinfected patients receiving HBV‐active cART.     

Profile of hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND: Although chronic hepatitis B occurs in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients, its prevalence and clinical significance are not known. AIM: To determine the prevalence and profile of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 363 consecutive patients (mean age 36 y; 288 men) with chronic HBV infection was performed. All patients were HBsAg-positive. Tests for liver profile, HBeAg and anti-HBe antibody were performed in all patients. Serum HBV DNA was tested using branched DNA assay in 245 patients. The patients were classified into three groups: no cirrhosis with normal ALT levels, no cirrhosis with elevated ALT levels, and clinical or histological evidence of cirrhosis. RESULTS: Of 363 patients, 141 (39%) were HBeAg-positive and 222 (61%) HBeAg-negative. Of HBeAg-negative patients, 120 (54%) had normal ALT, 45 (20%) had elevated ALT and 57 (26%) had evidence of cirrhosis; corresponding figures in the HBeAg-positive patients were 40 (28%), 66 (47%) and 35 (25%). HBV DNA was positive in 53 of 131 (40%) HBeAg-negative patients tested; of these 53 patients, 9 (17%) had normal ALT, 20 (38%) had elevated ALT and 24 (45%) had cirrhosis. Thus, 72% of HBeAg-positive and 46% of HBeAg-negative patients had elevated ALT and/or cirrhosis. Among the latter group, 83% of HBV DNA-positive patients had elevated ALT and/or cirrhosis. Overall, 18% of HBsAg-positive patients had HBeAg-negative, HBV DNA-positive liver disease. CONCLUSION: HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B is not an uncommon and benign entity and chronic liver disease develops in a significant proportion of such patients.     

Comparison of hepatitis B surface antigen and e antigen in predicting liver histology in hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B patients

Background/Aim

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels and liver histology in HBeAg-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (CHB) infection.

Methods

Serum HBsAg and HBeAg levels were analyzed, and liver biopsies were obtained from 203 HBeAg-positive CHB patients (62.6 % males; median age 31.3 years). The upper limit of normal (ULN) for ALT in this study was 30 and 19 U/L for males and females, respectively. Histologic assessment was based on Scheuer classification.

Results

ALT <2 × ULN, fibrosis stage <S2, and necro-inflammation grade <G2 were noted in 70 (34.5 %), 141 (69.5 %), and 105 (51.7 %) patients, respectively. Patients with significant histology (fibrosis stage ≥S2 and/or fibrosis stage of 1 plus inflammation grade ≥2) had significantly lower median HBsAg (13,998.4 and 42,186.5 IU/mL, respectively, p < 0.001) and HBeAg levels (540.5 and 1,206.8 S/CO, respectively, p < 0.001) than patients with insignificant histology. Among patients with ALT <2 × ULN, the area under the ROC curve for serum HBsAg and HBeAg levels was 0.76 and 0.70, respectively. Using a cutoff value of 17,558 IU/mL for HBsAg and 875.6 S/CO for HBeAg in patients with ALT <2×ULN, positive predictive values for insignificant histology were 87 and 86.8 %, respectively, whereas the negative predictive values were 50 and 47.1 %, respectively.

Conclusions

Among HBeAg-positive patients with ALT <2 × ULN, high-serum HBsAg and HBeAg levels can equally accurately predict insignificant histology.     

Treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients

Opinion statement Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) occurs at the late phase in hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection’s natural history. The disease is characterized by progressive liver damage due to variants with mutations in the precore/core promoter region that reduce or abolish HBeAg expression. Chronic HBeAg-negative disease’s prognosis is poor, with only rare incidences of spontaneous remission. Recent studies in Europe, Asia, and the United States all have reported an increased prevalence of HBeAg-negative and a decreased prevalence of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis; this may be related to increased awareness, decrease in new HBV infections, and aging of existing carriers. The end point of therapy for HBeAg-negative CHB patients is difficult to assess. In most studies, HBV DNA suppression and normalization of serum alanine aminotransaminase levels have been used to indicate therapeutic response. Six drugs currently are licensed for the treatment of CHB infection. These are the immunomodulatory agents (conventional interferon-α-2b and pegylated interferon-α-2a) and the nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir, and telbivudine). Sustained treatment response rates generally are poor due to the high probability of relapse, particularly following nucleoside/nucleotide analogue therapy. As not all patients can tolerate or will respond to interferon-based therapy, maintenance therapy with nucleoside/nucleotide therapy is the alternative. However, this latter approach can lead to development of viral resistance and long-term safety concerns.     

Viral factors correlate with hepatitis B e antigen seroconverson in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Seroconversion (SC) from hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg) to anti-HBe usually indicates lower viral loads, resolved hepatitis activity and improved long-term outcomes. However, the role of viral factors in the development of SC remains largely unknown. We thus comprehensively studied these factors in 25 patients with sustained HBeAg SC and seven control patients with sustained loss of HBeAg. METHODS: We determined viral factors in serum samples obtained 1 year before, 6 months before, 3 months before, at the time of, 6 months after and 1 year after HBeAg SC or HBeAg loss. Precore A1896 and basal core promoter T1762/A1764 mutants were determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays. Serum HBV levels were determined by a real-time PCR assay. RESULTS: We found that decline of serum viral load, frequently accompanied by hepatitis exacerbation, occurred within 1 year before HBeAg SC. The proportions of precore and BCP mutations also increased gradually throughout the process of HBeAg SC. The virologic features were similar between HBeAg SC group and HBeAg loss group. Before HBeAg SC or loss, genotype B patients had higher serum viral loads and lower proportions of BCP mutation compared with genotype C patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggested that viral factors correlate with the development of sustained HBeAg SC or loss.     

Hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B in Hong Kong

Hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B (e-CHB) has been reported in Asia but its prevalence and clinical significance have not been determined. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of e-CHB in Hong Kong and the frequency of precore and core promoter mutations in these patients. A cross-sectional study was performed in 350 consecutive Chinese patients (230 men and 120 women; mean age +/-SD, 42 +/- 13 years) with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. A total of 243 (69%) patients were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative of whom 15% had clinical cirrhosis. In the remaining 85% of patients, 63% had normal and 22% had elevated transaminases. Serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA was detectable using branched DNA assay in 46% of HBeAg-negative patients with clinical cirrhosis/elevated transaminases. Forty-five percent of the patients with e-CHB had the precore stop codon mutation, and an additional 41% had core promoter changes. There was no correlation between the presence of precore/core promoter mutations and liver disease or HBV-DNA levels. Overall, 17% of HBeAg-negative patients were viremic and had evidence of chronic liver disease (e-CHB) with mean HBV-DNA levels comparable with that in HBeAg-positive patients. In summary, we found that e-CHB may be present in up to 17% of HBeAg-negative patients seen in a tertiary referral center in Hong Kong. e-CHB may be a heterogeneous condition and is not invariably associated with the precore HBV mutant. Population studies are needed to determine the true prevalence of e-CHB in Asia and to assess its natural course and response to treatment.     

拉米夫定治疗e抗原阴性慢性乙型肝炎的早期预测指标分析

目的 评价拉米夫定(LAM)治疗e抗原阴性慢性乙型肝炎患者治疗前基线ALT、HBsAg、HBV DNA水平以及治疗4周和12周时HBV DNA<1×10~3拷贝/ml对其治疗104周时抗HBV疗效的预测价值. 方法 127例成年e抗原阴性慢性乙型肝炎患者均接受LAM 100 mg/d治疗,且均完成≥104周的治疗.治疗期间定期复查肝功能、HBV标志物(HBsAg、抗-HBs,HBeAg、抗-HBe、抗-HBc)及HBV DNA水平.分别比较和分析不同基线ALT、HBsAg、HBV DNA水平及治疗4周和12周时不同HBV DNA水平与治疗104周时疗效的关系.数据采用x~2检验及多元逐步Logistic回归分析.结果 基线ALT<5×正常值上限(ULN)和ALT≥5×ULN两组患者,治疗104周血清HBV DNA<1×10~3拷贝/ml的比例分别为50.0%和86.8%(P<0.01).基线HBsAg<2000 COI和HBsAg≥2000 COI两组患者,治疗104周时HBsAg<500 COI的比例分别为19.1%和17.5%(P>0.05);HBsAg/抗-HBS血清学转换率分别为2.1%和2.5%(P>0.05),血清HBV DNA<1×10~3拷贝/ml的比例分别为61.7%和67.5%(P>0.05).基线HBV DNA<1×10~6拷贝/ml和HBV DNA≥1×10~6拷贝/ml两组患者,至治疗4周和12周时HBV DNA<1×10~3拷贝/ml的比例差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.01),但至治疗104周时HBV DNA<1×10~3拷贝/ml的比例分别为62.7%和67.1%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗4周时HBVDNA<1×10~3拷贝/ml和HBV DNA≥1×10~3拷贝/ml两组患者,104周时HBV DNA<1×10~3拷贝/ml的比例分别为70.7%和60.9%(P>0.05);治疗12周时HBV DNA<1×10~3拷贝/ml和HBV DNA≥1×10~3拷贝/ml两组患者,104周时HBV DNA<1×10~3拷贝/ml的比例分别为78.8%和38.1%(P<0.01).结论 基线ALT≥5×ULN和治疗12周HBV DNA<1×10~3拷贝/ml的e抗原阴性慢性乙型肝炎患者用LAM继续治疗至104周时可以取得较好的病毒学应答.治疗前不同基线HBsAg水平对治疗104周时HBsAg的水平、HBsAg/抗-HBs血清学转换率和HBV载量的预测价值不大;基线HBV DNA水平对104周时是否获得病毒学应答的预测价值也不大.     

Determinants of spontaneous surface antigen loss in hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients with a low viral load

Loss of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) usually indicates the cure of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. In spontaneous hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconverters, lower serum HBsAg and HBV DNA levels have been shown to be associated with HBsAg loss over time. However, little is known about their impacts on HBsAg loss in HBeAg-negative patients with limited viral replication. A total of 688 HBeAg-negative patients with baseline serum HBV DNA levels <2000 IU/mL were enrolled in Taiwan. The relationships of HBsAg and HBV DNA levels with subsequent HBsAg loss were investigated. In a mean follow-up of 11.6 years, the average annual rate of HBsAg loss was 1.6%. Baseline HBsAg and HBV DNA levels were inversely associated with subsequent HBsAg loss. When compared to patients who had HBsAg levels >1000 IU/mL, the rates of HBsAg loss were significantly higher in patients with HBsAg levels of 100-999, 10-99, and <10 IU/mL, with hazard ratios of 2.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-4.0), 2.8 (95% CI, 1.6-5.0), and 13.2 (95% CI, 8.1-21.5), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that HBsAg level, but not HBV DNA, remained as an independent factor. The adjusted hazard ratio of HBsAg loss was 13.2 (95% CI, 7.8-22.1) for HBsAg level <10 versus ≥ 1000 IU/mL. When compared to HBV DNA level by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, HBsAg level served as a better predictor of both 5-year and 10-year HBsAg loss. CONCLUSION: In HBeAg-negative patients with HBV genotype B or C infection who have HBV DNA level <2000 IU/mL, HBsAg level <10 IU/mL is the strongest predictor of HBsAg loss.     

Telbivudine vs tenofovir in hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B patients: OPTIMA roadmap study

AIM To make efficacy and safety comparison of telbivudineraodmap and tenofovir-roadmap in hepatitis B e antigen(HBe Ag)-negative chronic hepatitis B(CHB) patients.METHODS This was the first prospective, randomised, two-arm, open-label, non-inferiority study in HBe Ag-negative CHB patients that compared telbivudine and tenofovir administered as per roadmap concept. Patients were treated up to 24 wk and, depending on virologic response, continued the same therapy or received addon therapy up to 104 wk. Eligible patients received an additional 52 wk of treatment in the extension period(i.e., up to 156 wk). Patients who developed virologic breakthrough(VB) while on monotherapy also received add-on therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of patients achieving hepatitis B virus(HBV) DNA 300 copies/m L at week 52. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the rates of HBV DNA 300 and 169 copies/m L, HBV DNA change from baseline, alanine aminotransferase normalisation, hepatitis B surface antigen(HBs Ag) loss, HBs Ag seroconversion, VB, and emergence of resistance at various timepoints throughout the study. Safety and estimated glomerular filtration rate(e GFR) were also analysed.RESULTS A total of 241 patients were randomised. Non-inferiority of telbivudine arm to tenofovir arm was demonstrated at week 52(± 7 d window), with over 91% of patients in each treatment arm achieving HBV DNA level 300 copies/m L. Both arms were similar in terms of key secondary efficacy variables at weeks 104 and 156. The percentage of patients achieving HBV DNA 300 copies/m L remained high and was similar in the telbivudine and tenofovir arms at both weeks 104 and 156. Over 82% of patients in both arms achieved alanine aminotransferase normalisation at week 52, and this percentage remained high at weeks 104 and 156. Telbivudine treatment progressively reduced serum HBs Ag levels from baseline while no change was reported in quantitative HBs Ag during therapy with tenofovir. Both treaments showed acceptable safety profiles. The telbivudine arm showed e GFR improvement unlike the tenofovir arm.CONCLUSION Efficacy was shown for both telbivudine-roadmap and tenofovir-roadmap regimens in HBe Ag-negative CHB patients over 156 wk. Telbivudine arm was associated with renal improvement.     

Hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis B core-related antigen kinetics after adding pegylated-interferon to nucleos(t)ids analogues in hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients

BACKGROUNDHepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B patients under nucleos(t)ids analogues (NAs) rarely achieve hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss.AIMTo evaluate if the addition of pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) could decrease HBsAg and hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) levels and increase HBsAg loss rate in patients under NAs therapy.METHODSProspective, non-randomized, open-label trial evaluating the combination of Peg-IFN 180 µg/week plus NAs during forty-eight weeks vs NAs in monotherapy. Hepatitis B e antigen-negative non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B patients of a tertiary hospital, under NAs therapy for at least 2 years and with undetectable viral load, were eligible. Patients with hepatitis C virus, hepatitis D virus or human immunodeficiency virus co-infection and liver transplanted patients were excluded. HBsAg and HBcrAg levels (log10 U/mL) were measured at baseline and during ninety-six weeks. HBsAg loss rate was evaluated in both groups. Adverse events were recorded in both groups. The kinetic of HBsAg for each treatment group was evaluated from baseline to weeks 24 and 48 by the slope of the HBsAg decline (log10 IU/mL/week) using a linear regression model.RESULTSSixty-five patients were enrolled, 61% receiving tenofovir and 33% entecavir. Thirty-six (55%) were included in Peg-IFN-NA group and 29 (44%) in NA group. After matching by age and treatment duration, baseline HBsAg levels were comparable between groups (3.1 vs 3.2) (P = 0.25). HBsAg levels at weeks 24, 48 and 96 declined in Peg-IFN-NA group (-0.26, -0.40 and -0.44) and remained stable in NA group (-0.10, -0.10 and -0.10) (P < 0.05). The slope of HBsAg decline in Peg-IFN-NA group (-0.02) was higher than in NA group (-0.00) (P = 0.015). HBcrAg levels did not change. Eight (22%) patients discontinued Peg-IFN due to adverse events. The HBsAg loss was achieved in 3 (8.3%) patients of the Peg-IFN-NA group and 0 (0%) of the NA group. CONCLUSIONThe addition of Peg-IFN to NAs caused a greater and faster decrease of HBsAg levels compared to NA therapy. Side effects of Peg-IFN can limit its use in clinical practice.     

Serum cytokine profile in patients with hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic active hepatitis B and inactive hepatitis B virus carriers

An insufficient cellular immune response seems to be critical for the immunopathogenesis of chronic hepatitis B virus infection.We have previously demonstrated no differences of T-lymphocyte subsets in blood between inactive hepatitis B s antigen(HBsAg) carriers and patients with HBeAg-negative chronic active hepatitis B.This study investigated the peripheral blood cytokine profile in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic active hepatitis B infection(Group A,n = 21) and inactive HBsAg carriers(Group B,n = 13).Serum cytokines [interferon(IFN)-γ,tumor necrosis factor-α,interleukin(IL)-1b,IL-4,IL-12,IL-10,IL-2,IL-5,IL-8] were analyzed by using flow cytometry.Patients with chronic active disease presented with significantly decreased levels of IFN-γ and IL-10 compared to inac-tive carriers(P = 0.048 and P = 0.008,respectively).In HBeAg-negative chronic active hepatitis B patients,a significant negative correlation of IFN-γ levels with serum hepatitis B viral load was noted(P = 0.021).In conclusion,patients with HBeAg-negative chronic active hepatitis B and HBsAg inactive carriers display a different cytokine profile.Decreased Th1 response observed in patients with chronic active hepatitis B could be implicated in the persistence of virus replication and ongoing progression of liver disease.     

Relationship of clinical and virological factors with hepatitis activity in hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B virus-infected patients

To investigate the factors associated with active disease among hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive/hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection we studied chronic HBV infected patients who had undetectable HBeAg at the first visit. HBV DNA was determined by the cross-linking assay (NAXCOR) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Mutations in the core promoter and precore regions and viral genotypes were studied. Clinical outcome of these patients were followed and categorized as: (i) relapse (ALT > 200 IU/L or three times the previous levels); (ii) active hepatitis (elevated ALT < 200 IU/L with concomitant detectable HBV DNA); or (iii) remission. A total of eighty-five patients were followed up for 5.5 ± 1.0 years. At first visit, 31 (36.5%) patients had elevated ALT levels, 12 (14.1%) had measurable HBV DNA by the cross-linking assay and 26 (30.6%) by PCR. Sixteen (18.8%) patients had hepatitis relapse, 13 (15.3%) had active hepatitis, and 56 (65.9%) remained in remission. Core promoter and precore stop codon mutants were found in 27 and 12 patients, respectively. Eleven and 20 had genotype B and C HBV, respectively. Initial elevated ALT and detectable HBV DNA were associated with active liver disease. Patient demographics, viral mutants or genotypes failed to predict disease activity. Hence, serum ALT and HBV DNA levels offer the best prediction of natural course of HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection.