Interobserver variability in determining MIB-1 labeling indices in oligodendrogliomas

Several studies have shown that MIB-1 labeling indices correlate well with tumor grade and prognosis in a variety of tumor types. Several factors are responsible for some degree of variability in the determination of labeling indices. Interobserver variability is one of the factors often cited as responsible for this variability. A slide from each of 30 oligodendrogliomas, stained with MIB-1 antibody, was distributed to six pathologists. The same set of slides was reviewed by each individual. Each pathologist was instructed to determine a MIB-1 labeling index by evaluating 1,000 tumor cell nuclei from the area of the slide with the most staining. The labeling index record reflected a percentage of positive-staining tumor cells. Interobserver agreement was compared. MIB-1 labeling indices ranged from 0 to 45.7. Overall agreement was good (> or =0.75) with a concordance coefficient of 0.832 (confidence interval, 0.700 to 0.909). Variability was greater among tumors with higher labeling indices as compared with tumors with labeling indices closer to 0. The overall agreement of MIB-1 labeling indices, while not perfect, was good. The generally minor variability among observers may be related to differences in the area of the slide evaluated and in differing lower thresholds for interpreting positivity. Further improvement of concordance may theoretically be attainable by further training and discussion among observers.     

Differential diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor and other spindle cell tumors in the gastrointestinal tract based on immunohistochemical analysis

To confirm the usefulness of an immunohistochemical panel of antibodies for KIT (c-kit/CD117), CD34, desmin, smooth-muscle actin (SMA), h-caldesmon (HCD), S-100 protein, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and beta-catenin, 297 mesenchymal and peripheral nerve-sheath tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and intra-abdominal locations including 211 gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), 12 leiomyomas, 18 leiomyosarcomas, 17 solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs), 14 schwannomas, and 25 desmoid-type fibromatoses (DTFs) were analyzed immunohistochemically. Consistent (100%) immunoreactivity for KIT, CD34, desmin and S-100, and nuclear accumulation of beta-catenin were detected in GISTs, SFTs, smooth-muscle tumors, schwannomas, and DTFs, respectively. Immunoreactivity for SMA, HCD, and NSE was observed in a wide range of these tumors. In addition, 418 bone and soft tissue tumors were enrolled in this study for KIT immunostaining. As a result, a limited number of these tumors were KIT positive, including synovial sarcoma that showed morphological similarity to GISTs. These findings suggest that KIT, CD34, desmin, S-100, and beta-catenin are key markers for clinical diagnosis of GISTs and other spindle cell tumors that may involve the gastrointestinal tract, whereas SMA, HCD, and NSE have only limited value.     

Interobserver reproducibility of MIB-1 labeling index in astrocytic tumors using different counting methods.

MIB-1 labeling index has been used as a complementary method to differentiate better and worse prognostic groups of astrocytic tumors. However, its reproducibility has been doubted because of the interlaboratory and interobserver variability. We studied the interobserver reproducibility of four manual counting methods of MIB-1 labeling index, including direct counting, area fraction, line intersection with a graticule, and line intersection without a graticule to estimate the total number of the cells. Using line intersection estimate, either with or without a graticule, yielded a worse result. Those MIB-1 labeling indices of astrocytomas were overlapping with those of anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas. Besides, the intraclass correlation coefficient was smaller, and the coefficient of variation was greater than that attained when using a graticule and counting the total number of cells either directly or by area-fraction estimate. The level of interobserver agreement using an MIB-1 labeling index cutoff value of 11.0 was moderate to substantial when applying the line-intersection estimate, and it was almost perfect when applying the direct counting or the area-fraction estimate. The interobserver reproducibility and agreement of MIB-1 labeling index in astrocytic tumors were different depending on the counting methods. Direct counting with a graticule yielded the best result. Before establishing reference standards for staining and counting, the reproducibility of MIB-1 labeling index should be verified.     

MIB-1 labeling indices in benign, aggressive, and malignant meningiomas: A study of 90 tumors

Predicting tumor behavior in meningiomas based on histology alone has been problematic. This study retrospectively compares histology and MIB-1 (cell proliferation marker) labeling indices (LI) in benign, aggressive, and malignant meningiomas. Six histological features, including mitoses, necrosis, loss of pattern, hypervascularity/ hemosiderin deposition, prominent nucleoli, and nuclear pleomorphism, were compared in 90 meningiomas (Fisher's exact test). Tumors with two or more of the above features were designated as aggressive meningiomas. Malignant meningiomas were characterized by brain invasion or metastasis. The MIB-1 Us (% positive tumor cell nuclei) were compared between the three groups (Kruskal-Wallis test, Wilcoxon two-sample test). Of the benign meningiomas (n = 37; mean age, 54 years), 41% had one of the six histological features, with nuclear pleomorphism (n = 10) being the most frequent. The aggressive tumors (n = 29; mean age, 61 years) were characterized by nuclear pleomorphism (n = 28), mitoses (n = 20), necrosis (n = 16), loss of pattern (n = 16), prominent nucleoli (n = 6), and hypervascularity/hemosiderin deposition (n = 5). Malignant tumors (n = 24; mean age, 59 years) were characterized by nuclear pleomorphism (n = 22), mitoses (n = 21), loss of pattern (n = 21), necrosis (n = 21), nucleoli (n = 17), and hypervascularity/hemosiderin deposition (n = 3). Significant differences were found between the aggressive and malignant groups with regard to loss of pattern, necrosis, and nucleoli (P = .0043, .011, and .00029, respectively). Mean MIB-1 LIs for the benign, aggressive, and malignant groups were 1.0% (range, 0 to 5.5%), 5.5% (range, 0.1 to 32.5%), and 12.0% (range, 0.3 to 32.5%), respectively. Differences in the mean MIB-1 LI between groups were statistically significant, with P values of <.0001 (benign v aggressive) and .0012 (aggressive v malignant). Mean MIB-1 LIs for recurrent versus nonrecurrent tumors were 7.1% (range, 0 to 32.5%) versus 3.8% (range, 0 to 20.9%) (P = .32). The mean MIB-1 LI for patients who were alive with or without tumor was 6.2% (range, 0 to 32.5%) versus a mean MIB-1 LI of 14.2% (range, 2.8% to 32.5%) for patients who died of or with tumor (P = .0013). In conclusion, (1) There is a statistically significant difference in the increasing MIB-1 LI means between benign, aggressive, and malignant meningiomas and between patients who were alive versus those who died; (2) there is some overlap in MIB-1 LI ranges between groups, which warrants caution in interpreting an individual MIB-1 LI in a given tumor.     

KIT codon 558 insertions in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Analysis of 17 rare KIT mutants

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of gastrointestinal tract often driven by oncogenic KIT exon 11 mutations. Although deletions and substitutions are most frequent KIT exon 11 mutations, duplications and insertions have been reported as well. In contrast to duplications, which cluster in 3′KIT exon 11, insertions affect 5′KIT, particularly codon 558. Clinicopathologic profile of gastrointestinal stromal tumors with insertions in codon 558 is not known. In this study, 17 gastrointestinal stromal tumors with codon 558 insertions are reported. Fifteen (88.2%) KIT codon 558 insertions consisted of 1694_1695insTCC leading to Lys558delinsAsnPro. However, 2 variant mutants Lys558delinsAsnGln and Lys558delinsAsnAsn were also identified. Based on analysis of inserted and flanking sequences, the insertions contain inverted DNA sequences of the opposite strand. Therefore, these insertions may develop due to a DNA strand switch during replication by DNA polymerases and by the effects of several different DNA repair processes. Patient median age was 61 years, and male-to-female ratio was 1:1.8. gastrointestinal stromal tumors were diagnosed in stomach (n = 4), small intestine (n = 7), and rectum (n = 3). Three tumors were disseminated and primary location could not be established. Fourteen tumors had spindle cell morphology, and epithelioid cell features were seen in 2 intestinal and 1 disseminated gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Based on size and mitotic activity, 2 (50%) of 4 gastric and 3 (48.9%) of 7 small intestinal gastrointestinal stromal tumors had more than 50% risk of metastases according to previous studies of gastrointestinal stromal tumor prognosis. All 3 rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors were malignant. Metastases were verified in 8 (66.7%) of 12 patients with known clinical and follow-up data. In summary, KIT codon 558 insertions are rare mutations accounting for less than 1% of all KIT mutants. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors with these mutations appear to have predilection to female patients and intestinal location. Moreover, KIT codon 558 insertions might indicate an increased risk of malignant behavior for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.     

Histopathologic features and MIB-1 labeling indices in recurrent and nonrecurrent meningiomas.

BACKGROUND: Predicting the behavior of meningiomas based on histopathologic features alone has remained problematic. DESIGN: This study retrospectively compared several histopathologic features and MIB-1 labeling indices (LIs) in recurrent meningiomas with those of nonrecurrent meningiomas. Six histopathologic features, including mitoses, necrosis, loss of architectural pattern, hypervascularity/hemosiderin deposition, prominent nucleoli, and nuclear pleomorphism, were compared between 32 recurrent and 27 nonrecurrent meningiomas using Fisher exact tests. MIB-1 LIs (% positive tumor cell nuclei) were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: The patients in the recurrent group included 26 women (mean age, 55 years), who developed 1 to 5 recurrences. Time intervals to the first recurrence ranged from 5 to 183 months (mean, 55 months). The nonrecurrent group included 21 women (mean age, 56 years), with follow-up ranging from 88 to 124 months (mean, 109 months). Of the histopathologic features evaluated, statistically significant differences between the recurrent and nonrecurrent groups were found only with respect to prominent nucleoli (P =.024) and nuclear pleomorphism (P <.001), both of which were more common in the recurrent group. In the recurrent group, 9 tumors were considered malignant (defined by brain invasion or metastasis) versus 2 of the nonrecurrent meningiomas. Nineteen percent of nonrecurrent tumors versus 41% of recurrent tumors had 2 or more of the 6 histopathologic features. MIB-1 LIs in the nonrecurrent group ranged from 0 to 8.3 (mean, 1.5) and were generally lower than those in the recurrent group (range, 0-32.5; mean, 5.4); no statistical difference was identified between these groups. No statistically significant difference with regard to histology or MIB-1 LIs was noted between the initially excised recurrent tumor and the most recently resected recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Of the histopathologic features examined, only prominent nucleoli and nuclear pleomorphism were found to be statistically more common in recurrent than nonrecurrent meningiomas. The mean MIB-1 LI was higher in the recurrent than in the nonrecurrent group, although there was no statistical difference between means and there was clear overlap with regard to MIB-1 LI ranges.     

Site-dependent differential KIT and PDGFRA expression in gastric and intestinal gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

In gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), mutually exclusive gain-of-function mutations of KIT and PDGFRA are associated with different mutation-dependent clinical behavior. Taking into account the well-known different clinical behavior of GISTs from the stomach or the intestine, the aim of the current study is to evaluate the mutation- and site-dependent effects on mRNA and protein expression of KIT and PDGFRA in a large series of primary GISTs. Fresh-frozen tissue of 53 primary GISTs from gastric (75%) or intestinal (25%) sites were analyzed for mutation of KIT or PDGFRA using direct sequencing. Furthermore, KIT and PDGFRA mRNA and protein expression were determined using quantitative RT-PCR and quantitative densitometric evaluation of Western blot data. Each tumor either had a mutation of KIT (79%) or PDGFRA (21%). All GISTs with PDGFRA mutation were from gastric sites. Mutation-dependently, GISTs with KIT mutation had a significantly higher expression of KIT and at the same time a significantly lower expression of PDGFRA compared to GISTs with PDGFRA mutation. Site-dependently, gastric GISTs had a significantly higher expression of PDGFRA and a significantly lower expression of KIT compared to intestinal GISTs. Additionally, even if the KIT-mutated GISTs alone were considered, a significantly higher expression of PDGFRA could be observed in gastric than in intestinal tumors. We also found a significant correlation between a higher protein expression of PDGFRA and longer disease-free survival. The correlation of gastric site and PDGFRA mutation with higher PDGFRA expression and longer disease-free survival suggests different regulatory roles of KIT and PDGFRA gene expression on the control of cell proliferation, and, thereby on clinical behavior. The higher PDGFRA expression in gastric GISTs possibly contributes to the well-known site-dependent clinical behavior.     

The role of KIT in the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors

In recent years, immunohistochemical staining for KIT (CD117) has become integral to the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), nearly 90% of which harbor activating mutations in the KIT receptor tyrosine kinase gene. Approximately 80% of patients with metastatic GIST show at least some clinical response to the targeted small molecule KIT inhibitor imatinib. The response to imatinib is closely correlated with the presence and type of KIT mutation. GISTs with the most common KIT exon 11 mutations have the highest response rate by far, whereas GISTs lacking mutations in KIT or the alternative receptor tyrosine kinase PDGFRA show much lower rates of response to imatinib. Less than 5% of GISTs are KIT-immunonegative; and many of these tumors have activating mutations of PDGFRA, some of which are also inhibited by imatinib. Most patients who initially respond to imatinib become resistant and eventually progress, which coincides with the selection of imatinib-resistant secondary KIT mutations in the kinase domain. Sunitinib has recently been approved for patients with GIST, principally those who fail imatinib therapy; and additional small molecule inhibitors are in the pipeline. It is becoming evident that alternative approaches to direct KIT inhibition will be required for long-term survival of patients with advanced GISTs. This review examines the role of KIT in the diagnosis and management of patients with GIST.     

c-kit mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors occur preferentially in the spindle rather than in the epithelioid cell variant.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) coexpress CD34 and the Kit tyrosine-kinase receptor (CD117). A subset of GISTs carry gain-of-function mutations of the c-kit proto-oncogene in its juxtamembrane domain. The relationship between the mutational status and histological as well as immunohistochemical features has not been assessed in detail. 36 GISTs and 14 other gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors were investigated for their morphology and immunophenotype as well as for the presence of c-kit mutations. DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Exons 9, 11, 13, and 17 of c-kit were analyzed by SSCP. Bands with altered mobility were excised, reamplified, and sequenced. C-kit mutations in Exon 11 encoding the juxtamembrane domain were identified in 19 cases (52.8%), with deletions in 12 cases, insertions in 3 cases (2 of these as duplications), and point mutations in 4 cases. The mutations clustered between Codons 553 and 561, pinpointing the critical region for deregulated Kit receptor activation. In both Exons 9 and 13, single mutations could be identified, whereas no mutations were found in Exon 17. There were c-kit mutations in 66.6% of benign GISTs (14/21), 83.3% of the malignant (5/6), and 40% of the cases of intermediate malignancy (2/5). A low frequency of mutations in benign GISTs, as reported previously by other researchers, could not be observed in our panel. Interestingly, all GISTs with c-kit mutations displayed a spindle cell phenotype, whereas mutations were absent in all 7 tumors with an epithelioid component (P =.03). This finding suggests a relationship between c-kit mutation and histological subtype in GISTs.     

Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in stromal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract

Cyclooxygenase (COX) is a key enzyme in the conversion of arachidonic acid to prostaglandins, prostacyclin, and thromboxane. COX-2 is expressed in many epithelial malignancies, particularly those of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. COX-2 has been implicated in the pathogenesis of cancers and has a significant negative effect on survival. To date, little is known about the expression of COX-2 in nonepithelial tumors. The objective of this study was to evaluate the expression of COX-2 in GI stromal tumors (GISTs). We evaluated 15 GISTs using tissue microarray. Tissue blocks were retrieved and stained with hematoxylin and eosin to evaluate the histological tumor type. In addition, immunohistochemistry was performed for COX-2, the macrophage marker, CD68 (KP-1), and KIT (CD117). Two pathologists then evaluated the tissues to determine the extent and intensity of COX-2 expression. The location of CD68-positive cells, and whether these cells were COX-2 positive, was also evaluated. The results showed that 80% (12 of 15) of the tumors expressed COX-2. Expression was noted in the cytoplasm of the tumor cells, with variable intensity of staining among the tumors. COX-2 was expressed in both epithelial cell and spindle cell tumors, but appeared stronger in epithelial lesions. In mixed lesions, COX-2 was expressed to a greater extent in epithelial areas. There was a greater extent of COX-2 expression in malignant tumors and tumors located within the stomach. Tumor-infiltrating macrophages (CD68-positive cells) were identified in all of the lesions; in 80% of cases, those macrophages also expressed COX-2. This study is the first to demonstrate COX-2 expression in stromal lesions of the GI tract. The enzyme may play a role in the proliferation of these lesions, suggesting the potential use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in treatment.     

Germline-activating mutation in the kinase domain of KIT gene in familial gastrointestinal stromal tumors

The proto-oncogene KIT encodes the receptor tyrosine kinase KIT. Gain-of-function mutations in the juxtamembrane domain of KIT have been reported in human gastrointestinal stromal tumors. In a family with multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumors and diffuse hyperplasia of myenteric plexus layer, we have identified another mutation of KIT, a single base mutation, resulting in the substitution of Glu for Lys(642) in the kinase I domain, and studied its biological effect in a cellular system. The mouse homologue of the human KIT mutant was generated by site-directed mutagenesis and stably transfected into the interleukin-3-dependent Ba/F3 murine cell line. The oncogenic potential of the mutated KIT was assessed in vitro by a proliferation assay and in vivo by transplantation into nude mice. Transfected Ba/F3 cells grew autonomously in absence of growth factors and formed tumors in nude mice. Substitution of Glu for Lys(642) is an oncogenic mutation in the tyrosine kinase domain of KIT. As germline heterozygous mutation, it causes a diffuse hyperplasia of myenteric interstitial cells of Cajal during embryonic development and occurrence of multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumors at adulthood.     

An in vitro cytologic assay for evaluation of the KIT signaling pathway in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Specific inhibitors can be designed to inactivate the molecular pathways involved in tumor growth. A compelling example is the use of small molecule drugs, such as imatinib (Gleevec), which inhibit the KIT tyrosine kinase in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Assays are needed to determine which inhibitor is most effective at silencing the KIT kinase in each GIST patient. The aim of this study was to develop a robust, cytology-based assay to measure tumor susceptibility to target-specific small molecule inhibitors. We created an immortal GIST cell line (GIST882) that was treated in vitro with several inhibitors of the KIT --> AKT --> mTOR --> S6 signaling pathway. KIT was inhibited with imatinib, and mTOR with RAD001. Treatment response was assessed in cytologic preparations by immunocytochemical staining with antibodies to KIT, phospho-KIT, phospho-AKT, and phospho-S6. Optimization was performed to maximize staining in the absence of inhibitor, and minimize staining in the presence of inhibitor. GIST882 cells demonstrated strong, robust phospho-S6 expression in the absence of inhibitor. This expression was completely inhibited by treatment with upstream signaling pathway inhibitors (imatinib and RAD001). Other phospho-specific antibodies had weaker baseline reactivity in the absence of inhibitor. The accuracy of the immunocytochemical results on the cytologic preparations was validated by immunoblotting studies. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of cytologic methods to monitor labile biochemical responses in tumor cells during drug therapy. Such approaches will be enhanced by the development of additional activation state-specific antibodies, particularly those optimized for use in cytologic preparations.     

The novel marker, DOG1, is expressed ubiquitously in gastrointestinal stromal tumors irrespective of KIT or PDGFRA mutation status

We recently characterized gene expression patterns in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) using cDNA microarrays, and found that the gene FLJ10261 (DOG1, discovered on GIST-1), encoding a hypothetical protein, was specifically expressed in GISTs. The immunoreactivity of a rabbit antiserum to synthetic DOG1 peptides was assessed on two soft tissue tumor microarrays. The tissue microarrays included 587 soft tissue tumors, with 149 GISTs, including 127 GIST cases for which the KIT and PDGFRA mutation status was known. Immunoreactivity for DOG1 was found in 136 of 139 (97.8%) of scorable GISTs. All seven GIST cases with a PDGFRA mutation were DOG1-positive, while most of these failed to react for KIT. The immunohistochemical findings were confirmed with in situ hybridization probes for DOG1, KIT, and PDGFRA. Other neoplasms in the differential diagnosis of GIST, including desmoid fibromatosis (0 of 17) and Schwannoma (0 of 3), were immunonegative for DOG1. Only 4 of 438 non-GIST cases were immunoreactive for DOG1. DOG1, a protein of unknown function, is expressed strongly on the cell surface of GISTs and is rarely expressed in other soft tissue tumors. Reactivity for DOG1 may aid in the diagnosis of GISTs, including PDGFRA mutants that fail to express KIT antigen, and lead to appropriate treatment with imatinib mesylate, an inhibitor of the KIT tyrosine kinase.     

c-kit基因分析在胃肠间质瘤病理诊断和靶向药物治疗中的应用

胃肠间质瘤（gastrointestinal stromal tumors,GIST）是消化道最常见的问叶性肿瘤。c-kit基因的过表达被视为是诊断GIST非常重要的指标之一。c-kit基因过表达是由于c-kit基因发生获得性功能突变,属于激活型或致瘤性突变,引起c-kit基因蛋白自动磷酸化,进而激活下游信号转导蛋白发生磷酸化,对细胞增殖、凋亡和黏附发挥调节作用。     

Comparative study using rabbit-derived polyclonal, mouse-derived monoclonal, and rabbit-derived monoclonal antibodies for KIT immunostaining in GIST and other tumors

To find a better condition for KIT immunostaining, five antibodies against KIT were compared, including a widely used polyclonal antibody (pAb) A4502, three mouse-derived mAb (MMA; T595, 1DC3, K45), and a newly developed rabbit-derived mAb (RabMA; Y145). Twenty-three gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) were stained, including five KIT-weak or -negative GIST with PDGFRA gene mutations from a previous report, six Ewing/malignant primitive peripheral neuroectodermal tumor, six malignant melanomas, two neuroblastomas, six seminomas, seven thymic carcinoma and seven small cell carcinomas of the lung as KIT-expressing tumors, and four leiomyomas, six leiomyosarcomas, five gastric schwannomas, four solitary fibrous tumors, one inflammatory fibroid polyp and six desmoid tumors as KIT-non-expressing tumors. The positive rates of RabMA Y145 in KIT-expressing tumors were almost equal to pAb A4502, whereas those of three MMA had lower rates. MMA T595 was positive for mast cells, but negative for interstitial cells of Cajal and some GIST. None of the KIT-non-expressing tumors was positive for Y145, whereas some leiomyosarcomas and desmoid tumors were positive for A4502. At present, pAb A4502 or RabMA Y145 seems to be suitable for KIT immunostaining in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor specimens, especially in the differential diagnosis of GIST from other mesenchymal tumors.     

Low-grade vulvar and vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia: correlation of histologic features with human papillomavirus DNA detection and MIB-1 immunostaining.

Histologic criteria of low-grade vulvar/vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN1/VAIN1) are well established; however, a significant interobserver variability in diagnosing VIN1/VAIN1 has been reported. The goal of this study was to evaluate the utility of MIB-1 immunostaining as an adjunct test to increase the diagnostic accuracy in equivocal cases of VIN1/VAIN1. The second goal was to examine the distribution of low- and high-oncogenic risk human papillomaviruses (HPVs) in VIN1/VAIN1 lesions. Consecutive vulvar/vaginal biopsies originally diagnosed as VIN1/VAIN1 (n = 43) or benign (n = 20) were reviewed by two pathologists to obtain a consensus diagnosis. The diagnosis was further confirmed with HPV testing using Short PCR Fragment 10 and Line Probe Assay. MIB-1 immunostaining was performed, and positive staining was defined as a cluster of two or more stained nuclei in the upper two thirds of the epithelial thickness. After verification of the diagnosis using the consensus histologic review and HPV detection as an objective confirmatory test, 31% of cases originally diagnosed as VIN1/VAIN1 were identified as being overdiagnosed. The sensitivity and the specificity of MIB-1 staining for identifying VIN1/VAIN1 were 0.96 and 0.90, respectively. Seventy percent of VIN1 cases were associated with low-risk viral types. In contrast, the majority (84%) of VAIN1 cases were associated with high-risk HPVs. In conclusion, MIB-1 staining is sensitive and specific for identifying VIN1/VAIN1, helpful in verifying the diagnosis in equivocal cases.     

A case of successful detection of disseminated gastrointestinal stromal tumors by ascites smear cytology using cell block preparation with DOG1 immunostaining

Cytological features of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) have been reported, especially regarding fine‐needle aspiration cytology, including immunostaining for c‐kit and DOG1. Meanwhile, cytological findings of GISTs on ascites cytology have rarely been reported, which may be owing to the rare appearance of GIST tumor cells in ascites. Herein, we present a 66‐year‐old woman who had disseminated GISTs in the abdomen. The GIST tumor cells appeared sparsely in the ascites smear cytology using ascites obtained at the time of autopsy. Even when widespread intra‐abdominal dissemination takes place, GISTs may be hard to detect in ascites smear cytology, based on the experience of this case. However, immunohistochemistry of DOG1 using a cell block preparation was found to clearly visualize the GIST tumor cells, although they were sparsely present. Immunostaining of c‐kit did not provide as clear an identification of the tumor cells as DOG1 did. When suspicious about GISTs, it is wise to prepare a cell block to make it possible to visualize the tumor cells immunohistochemically. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2016;44:137–140. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.