Prospective evaluation of the risk of bacteremia associated with transesophageal echocardiography

BACKGROUND. Transient bacteremia may lead to endocarditis in patients with significant valvular lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS. Because transesophageal echocardiography selects a patient population with a high prevalence of valvular lesions, we prospectively evaluated the risk of transient bacteremia associated with transesophageal echocardiography in 49 patients. Blood cultures were obtained immediately before transesophageal echocardiography and at 5, 10, and 20 minutes after the start of the procedure. For each culture, 30 ml venous blood was obtained and 10 ml was inoculated into each of an Isolator tube, Septi-chek bottle, and a nonvented Trypticase soy broth bottle. Broth cultures were incubated for 14 days. Blood from the Isolator tube was plated onto appropriate media for recovery of bacteria and fungi. Two patients were excluded from analysis because the final two sets of blood cultures could not be obtained. Among the remaining 47 study patients, two preprocedure control blood cultures were positive, and two of 141 subsequent cultures were positive. All isolates were considered contaminants. Thus, we found no significant bacteremia due to pathogenic oral flora during transesophageal echocardiography (0%; 95% CI, 0.0-7.5%). CONCLUSIONS. Although recommendations for antimicrobial prophylaxis for transesophageal echocardiography should be individualized for each patient, many patients may not require antimicrobial prophylaxis.     

Prospective study of blood culture during transesophageal echocardiography.

To ascertain the incidence and significance of bacteremia associated with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), 132 consecutive patients (aged 17 to 73 years) free of apparent infection who were undergoing 135 transesophageal echocardiographic procedures from October 1990 to August 1991, were prospectively studied. For each procedure, two sets of blood cultures were obtained for culture 30 to 60 minutes before TEE, immediately after, and 180 to 240 minutes after the procedure. For each blood culture, 10 ml of venous blood was evenly inoculated into aerobic and anaerobic culture bottles and inoculated for 7 days using a radiometric system. A throat swab was obtained immediately before each procedure. Three of 270 preprocedure blood cultures were positive for Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus simulans, and Peptostreptococcus species, respectively. No blood culture was positive in the immediate postprocedure period. Two of 270 late blood samples grew Staphylococcus epidermidis in the same patient. Nevertheless, the microorganisms isolated from blood cultures were different from those isolated from the throat swab. No patients had fever or evidence of infective endocarditis after TEE during the follow-up period. It is concluded that the incidence of TEE-related bacteremia is extremely low, and a general recommendation for antibiotic prophylaxis during TEE is not warranted.     

Prospective evaluation of the risk of bacteremia induced by transesophageal echocardiography

BACKGROUND: The incidence of bacteremia induced by transesophageal echocardiography is controversial in the Indian population. This study aimed to find out the occurrence of bacteremia following transesophageal echocardiography. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between February 2000 and January 2001, 47 patients (26 males and 21 females) were enrolled for the study. Their ages ranged from 13 to 61 years (mean: 35 +/- 11.4 years). Patients with prosthetic valves, suspected infective endocarditis and those on antibiotics were excluded. For each procedure, two sets of blood cultures were obtained immediately before and after the procedure. For each blood culture, 10 ml of blood was evenly inoculated into brain-heart infusion broth and biphasic infusion medium and incubated for 7 days. Transesophageal echocardiography was carried out under oropharyngeal anesthesia (xylocaine gel and spray). Two blood cultures taken before the procedure were positive and excluded from the final analysis. Of the remaining 45 patients whose preprocedure blood cultures were sterile, 6 samples (13.3%) were positive after the procedure diphtheroids in 3, micrococci in 2 and aerobic spore formers in 1. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the incidence of bacteremia related to transesophageal echocardiography is not insignificant, as reported in previous studies. Though routine antibiotic prophylaxis before transesophageal echocardiography is not advocated, it should be recommended in high-risk patients such as those with prosthetic valves, multivalvular involvement or those with a past history of infective endocarditis.     

Is anaerobic blood culture necessary? If so, who needs it?

BACKGROUND: The role of anaerobic blood cultures is not validated, although they are drawn routinely. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review at a private hospital in Japan for patients admitted between July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2005 to determine patient characteristics resulting in anaerobic blood culture. RESULTS: During the study period, 17,775 blood culture bottles were sent for the analysis, and 2132 bottles (12.0%) were positive for microbial growth. Bacteria were grown from 958 anaerobic bottles (44.7%), and 719 (33.7%) of those were judged to represent real infections, which accounted for 410 cases of bacteremia. Only 47 cases (11.5%) were detected by anaerobic cultures alone. Among those 47, obligate anaerobes represented 12 cases. Clinical evaluation could have predicted 7 of 12 cases of obligate anaerobic bacteremia. In the remaining 5 cases, the source of bacteremia was unclear. There were 2.7 cases of anaerobic bacteremia per 1000 blood cultures. The mortality attributable to anaerobic bacteremia was 50%. Among bacteremic cases not caused by obligate anaerobes yet diagnosed solely by anaerobic bottles, either the standard 2 sets of blood were not taken or their clinical outcomes were favorable. CONCLUSION: Anaerobic blood culture can be avoided in most cases. Anaerobic blood culture may be most helpful when (1) bacteremia because of obligate anaerobes is clinically suspected, (2) patients are severely immunocompromised, and (3) source of bacteremia is not identified by clinical evaluation.     

Meta-Analysis of Positive Blood Cultures During Transesophageal Echocardiography

We have reviewed ten prospective studies of bacteremia with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in 720 patients. The incidence of TEE related positive culture is low, and general recommendation for antibiotic prophylaxis during TEE is not warranted.     

Routine use of anaerobic blood cultures: are they still indicated?

PURPOSE: To determine the number of patients with bacteremia and fungemia and to evaluate the utility of routine anaerobic blood cultures as part of the work-up for suspected bacteremia. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of microbiology data followed by selective chart review at a university-affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Center. We determined the number of bacterial blood cultures drawn from January 1, 1994, to December 31, 1996, and the number of anaerobic, aerobic, and fungal isolates. Chart reviews were then performed on all patients with a positive anaerobic result.RESULTS: There were 6,891 sets of blood cultures processed through the laboratory, yielding 1,626 patients with positive results. Anaerobic isolates were recovered from 36 patients (2.2%) in 48 bottles. Aerobic isolates were recovered from 1550 patients (95.3%), and fungal isolates were recovered from 40 patients (2.5%). Seven patients (0.4%) had true anaerobic bacteremia. All seven patients had an obvious source of anaerobic infection that was known or suspected before the cultures were drawn. Antibiotic changes were made in four of these patients after the positive anaerobic results were known. Antibiotic changes led to clinical improvement in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of anaerobic blood cultures rarely results in clinically important diagnostic or therapeutic benefits, based on the low incidence of anaerobic bacteremia in patients who are not at increased risk. Anaerobic blood cultures should be selectively ordered in patients at risk for anaerobic infections.     

Staphylococcus aureus in a single positive blood culture: causes and outcome

Single positive culture was encountered in 61/235 patients (26%) with Staphylococcus aureus in blood culture over a 2-y period. It represented either true bacteremia (n = 52 cases; 85.2%) or contamination (n = 9; 14.8%). In comparison to cases with < or = 2 positive cultures, these patients did not have less severe disease or a lower incidence of complications.     

Incidence of bacteremia in cirrhotic patients undergoing upper endoscopic ultrasonography

Background

The incidence of bacteremia after endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) or EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is between 0% and 4%, but there are no data on this topic in cirrhotic patients.

Aim

To prospectively assess the incidence of bacteremia in cirrhotic patients undergoing EUS and EUS-FNA.

Patients and methods

We enrolled 41 cirrhotic patients. Of these, 16 (39%) also underwent EUS-FNA. Blood cultures were obtained before and at 5 and 30 min after the procedure. When EUS-FNA was used, an extra blood culture was obtained after the conclusion of radial EUS and before the introduction of the sectorial echoendoscope. All patients were clinically followed up for 7 days for signs of infection.

Results

Blood cultures were positive in 16 patients. In 10 patients, blood cultures grew coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium species, Propionibacterium species or Acinetobacterium Lwoffii, which were considered contaminants (contamination rate 9.8%, 95% CI: 5.7–16%). The remaining 6 patients had true positive blood cultures and were considered to have had true bacteremia (15%, 95% CI: 4–26%). Blood cultures were positive after diagnostic EUS in five patients but were positive after EUS-FNA in only one patient. Thus, the frequency of bacteremia after EUS and EUS-FNA was 12% and 6%, respectively (95% CI: 2–22% and 0.2–30%, respectively). Only one of the patients who developed bacteremia after EUS had a self-limiting fever with no other signs of infection.

Conclusion

Asymptomatic Gram-positive bacteremia developed in cirrhotic patients after EUS and EUS-FNA at a rate higher than in non-cirrhotic patients. However, this finding was not associated with any clinically significant infections.     

Prospective assessment of risk of bacteremia with colonoscopy and polypectomy

A prospective assessment was made of the frequency of positive blood cultures in patients undergoing colonoscopy with or without polypectomy. A total of 270 patients underwent 280 colonoscopies, of these, there were 105 patients that had 111 polypectomies. Blood cultures were taken prior to and within 15 min following each procedure. Six of 280 (2.1%) preprocedural blood cultures were positive. Seven of 169 (4%) blood cultures were positive within 15 min of insertion of the colonoscope in the colonoscopy only group. Eight of 223 (3.6%) blood cultures were positive within 10 min of the polypectomy. There was no clinical evidence of sepsis during the 24 hr following these procedures. In order to determine appropriate postprocedural sampling interyals, we induced aStaphylococcus epidermidis bacteremia with a mean of 1.16×10⁶ colony forming units/ml on 10 occasions in seven dogs. Within 30 min of inoculation, we were able to detect only one colony forming unit/ml. The rate of positive blood cultures during colonoscopy alone and following polypectomy during colonoscopy is comparable to other gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures. The most optimal time to collect blood cultures in order to detect transient bacteremia is as soon after the procedure as is feasibly possible.This research was supported in part by grants from the Victoria General Hospital Research Foundation, Inc., and the Manitoba Heart Foundation.     

Transesophageal echocardiographic diagnosis of right-sided cardiac masses in patients with central lines.

Transesophageal echocardiography provides excellent images of intracardiac masses; however, its use among a series of patients with central venous lines has not been fully described. Nineteen patients (aged 52 +/- 16 years; 10 women) had masses detected by transesophageal echocardiography in the presence of a permanent (0.2 to 16 years) pacing wire (n = 8), and a current (n = 9) or recent (n = 2) (1 to 281 days) indwelling catheter. Transthoracic echocardiography suggested the presence of a mass in 5 patients (26%), although in only 2 cases were its findings consistent with transesophageal findings. Transesophageal echocardiography indicated the presence of a mass in or near the superior vena cava in 13 patients, in the right atrium in 6, and adjacent to the tricuspid valve in 3. Discrete masses measured 1.6 +/- 2.1 cm2 in area during transesophageal echocardiography. Eleven patients had positive blood cultures, 7 with staphylococcal species. Mass size was not significantly altered by the type of line or sepsis, but showed a weak correlation with line age (r = 0.56). Transesophageal echocardiography altered the management of 9 patients, prompting surgery (n = 3) and line removal (n = 3), and antibiotic (n = 2) or anticoagulation (n = 3) therapy.     

Incidence of bacteraemia or fever during transoesophageal echocardiography: a prospective study of 82 patients

The incidence of bacteraemia during transoesophageal echocardiography(TEE) was evaluated in a prospective study of 82 consecutivepatients. Three series of blood cultures were carried out foreach patient: from group 1 (n=44), prior to the examination,at the end of the examination and 15min afterwards. For group2 (n=38), blood cultures were performed prior to the examination,10 min after the start and immediately after the end. A singlepositive blood culture was detected in two patients. For thefirst patient, blood culture at the end of the examination demonstratedCorynebacteria, and for the second, Staphylococcus epidermidiswas identified on cultures taken during the examination. Duringthe first 24 h, a transient subfebrile temperature was recordedin 15% of the patients, including the patient with the Corynebacteriapositiveblood culture. By mid-term (6 months) no patient had developedendocarditis.Ourfindings suggest that antibiotic prophylaxis during TEE isnot warranted.     

Viridans streptococcal bacteremia after esophageal stricture dilation

Background: The incidence of bacteremia with organisms that may cause infective endocarditis after esophageal stricture dilation is unknown. There is disagreement among physicians regarding the need for antibiotic prophylaxis for patients with valvular heart disease undergoing dilation. Our aim was to determine the frequency and duration of bacteremia associated with esophageal stricture dilation. Methods: Blood cultures were obtained before and after stricture dilation in patients without valvular heart disease and in a control group of patients undergoing upper endoscopy without dilation. Results: A total of 103 patients undergoing dilation and 50 control patients were studied; 22 of 103 patients (21%) undergoing dilation had at least one post-procedure blood culture positive for viridans streptococcus, compared with 1 of 50 (2%) of control patients (p = 0.001). Blood cultures obtained 1 minute after stricture dilation were positive for viridans streptococcus in 19 of 81 (23%), in 16 of 96 (17%) 5 minutes post-dilation, and in 3 of 63 (5%) 20 to 30 minutes post-dilation. Of the 19 patients with viridans streptococcus bacteremia 1 minute after dilation, cultures were still positive in 14 of 19 (74%) at 5 minutes and in 2 of 19 (10%) 20 to 30 minutes post-dilation. Conclusions: These data support the use of antibiotic prophylaxis before esophageal stricture dilation for patients with valvular heart disease at risk for the development of infective endocarditis. (Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:568-73.)     

Infectious endocarditis with negative blood cultures

Blood culture is a key investigation for the diagnosis of infectious endocarditis (IE). When negative, there are diagnostic and therapeutic problems. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency, the clinical features and the aetiological factors of IE with negative blood cultures compared with IE with positive blood cultures compared with IE with positive blood cultures. The authors undertook a retrospective review of 98 cases of patients admitted for IE from 1991 to 2000 to the Department of Infectious Diseases and Cardiology of Sousse (Tunisia). Of the 98 patients, 48 (48.9%), 29 men and 19 women with an average age of 34.3 years, had negative blood cultures. An infectious agent was identified in 7 cases (14.5%) by serology, valve culture or cerebrospinal fluid including Brucella (2), Coxiella (1) and Candida (1). Therefore, in 41 cases (42%), the cause of IE was not determined. Transthoracic echocardiography was of diagnostic value in 96% of cases and transoesophageal echocardiography showed disease not observed on transthoracic echocardiography in 5 cases. The main complication was cardiac failure (27 cases). The mortality was 14.5%. Comparison of the two groups showed that negative blood cultures were associated with a higher incidence of previous antibiotic therapy, extracardiac signs of IE and cardiac failure. Early surgical indications and mortality were the same in both groups. This report confirmed the high frequency of IE with negative blood cultures. Previous antibiotic therapy seems to be an important aetiological factor but cannot explain this high frequency. Methodological problems of blood cultures and the absence of systematic investigation for rare infectious agents are other possible factors.     

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a comparative study of 2 methods of ascitic fluid culture

The sensitivity in the diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis of ascitic fluid inoculation in blood culture bottles has been compared with the conventional method. We have analyzed 74 positive ascitic fluid cultures from 64 patients, the samples being processed by both techniques simultaneously. While all the ascitic fluid cultures performed by inoculation in blood culture bottles were positive, in only 42 from the 74 conventional cultures (56, 75%) bacterial growth was detected (p less than 0.001). Nineteen bacterascites were diagnosed by inoculation in blood culture bottles and 10 by the conventional method (p = NS). Gram stain was only positive in 3 spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (6%). We conclude that ascitic fluid inoculation in blood culture bottles improves significantly the sensitivity of the microbiological diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, without increasing the diagnosis of bacterascites.     

Effect of fluconazole prophylaxis on fungal blood cultures: an autopsy-based study involving 720 patients with haematological malignancy

To investigate the utility of blood culture of invasive fungal infections in patients with haematological malignancies, an autopsy survey was conducted in 720 patients who were treated between 1980 and 1999. We identified 252 patients with invasive mycosis. These included Candida (n = 94), Aspergillus (n = 91), Zygomycetes (n = 34), Cryptococcus (n = 7), Trichosporon (n = 11), Fusarium (n = 1), and unknown fungi (n = 20). Of the 94 patients with invasive candidiasis, 20 had positive blood cultures. Of the 11 patients with invasive trichosporonosis, seven had positive blood cultures. The sensitivities of blood cultures were 1.1%, 0% and 14% for detecting invasive aspergillosis, zygomycosis and cryptococcosis respectively. Multiple regression analysis showed a significant correlation between results of Candida blood cultures and some variables, including prophylactic use of absorbable antifungals (P = 0.0181) and infection by Candida albicans (P = 0.0086). The sensitivity of blood cultures decreased when patients received antifungal chemoprophylaxis. Unless these agents are inactivated in culture bottles, conventional blood cultures might produce false-negative results.     

Mycobacteremia and the new blood culture systems

Clinical and microbiologic aspects of mycobacteremia occurring in 11 patients are presented. Ten of the 11 patients were immunosuppressed. Disseminated disease was shown in 7 patients, transient bacteremia in 2, and endocarditis in 1. Blood cultures were positive in 11 blood culture systems. Newer blood culture systems appear to provide more rapid detection of mycobacteremia.     

Effect of delay of blood cultures on positive detection by automated blood culture system

The effect of entry delayed blood culture bottles until the start of incubation for mechanical detection of organism were compared using 2 major blood culture systems; BACTEC 9240 system and BacT/ALERT 3D system. Total of 13 bacterial strains; 5 gram-positive cocci, 7 gram-negative bacilli and Candida parapsilosis which were isolated mainly from blood cultures were used as the test strains. BACTEC 92F, 93F and BacT/ALERT FA, FN bottles were used as the blood culture bottles. All the bottles inoculated with the test strains were incubated and evaluated immediately after standing at room temperature for 24, 42, 48, 54 or 72 hours, using the respective automated blood culture systems. All the bottles were subcultured. The effect of entry delay the blood culture bottles for the mechanical detection was observed in many gram-negative organisms in BACTEC 9240 system. The blood cultures were evaluated not to be positive in 4 of the 10 samples on delaying for 24 hours or in any of the samples on delaying for 42 hours in the BACTEC 92F bottles inoculated with Escherichia coli. In Serratia marcescens, the blood cultures were evaluated not to be positive in 5 of the 10 samples on delaying for 24 hours or in any of the samples on delaying for 42 hours in the BACTEC 92F bottles. In Klebsiella pneumoniae, the blood cultures were evaluated not to be positive in 9 of the 10 samples on delaying for 42 hours. In Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Proteus mirabilis, the blood cultures were evaluated not to be positive in 5-6 of the 10 samples on delaying for 42 hours. On the other hand, the blood cultures were evaluated to be positive in most of the samples of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus (except 3 of the 10 samples which were evaluated not to be positive) on delaying for 42 hours in BacT/ALERT 3 D system. The samples except part of Streptococcus spp. were detected by subculture in both the bottles. These results indicate that the delayed time of blood culture bottles before inoculation with the test bacterial samples affects the positive detection of blood cultures markedly in the blood culture system. Therefore, the immediate incubation was considered to be necessary.     

Blood cultures have limited value in predicting severity of illness and as a diagnostic tool in ventilator-associated pneumonia.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To define the usefulness of blood cultures for confirming the pathogenic microorganism and severity of illness in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). DESIGN: Prospective observational study using BAL and blood cultures collected within 24 h of establishing a clinical diagnosis of VAP. SETTING: A 15-bed medical and surgical ICU. PATIENTS: One hundred and sixty-two patients receiving mechanical ventilation hospitalized for > 72 h who had new or progressive lung infiltrate plus at least two of three clinical criteria for VAP. INTERVENTIONS: BAL and blood culture performed within 24 h of establishing a clinical diagnosis of VAP. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Ninety patients were BAL positive (BAL+), satisfying a microbiological definition of VAP (>/= 10(4) cfu/mL), 72 patients were BAL negative (BAL-). Bacteremia was diagnosed when at least two sets of blood cultures yielded a microorganism or when only one set was positive, but the same bacteria was present at a concentration >/= 10(4) cfu/mL in the BAL fluid. Bacteremia was significantly more frequent in the BAL+ than in the BAL- group (22/90 patients vs 5/72 patients; p = 0.006). In 6 of 22 BAL+ patients with bacteremia, an extrapulmonary site of infection was the source of bacteremia. Sensitivity of blood culture for disclosing the pathogenic microorganism in BAL+ patients was 26%, and the positive predictive value to detect the pathogen was 73%. Factors associated with mortality were age > 50 years, simplified acute physiology score > 14, prior inadequate antibiotic therapy, PaO(2)/fraction of inspired oxygen < 205, and use of H(2) blockers. By multivariate analysis, only the use of prior inadequate antimicrobial therapy (odds ratio [OR], 6.47) and age > 50 years (OR, 5.12) were independently associated with higher mortality. The rate of complications was not different in patients with bacteremia. CONCLUSIONS: Blood cultures have a low sensitivity for detecting the same pathogenic microorganism as BAL culture in patients with VAP. The presence of bacteremia does not predict complications, it is not related to the length of stay, and it does not identify patients with more severe illness. Inadequacy of prior antimicrobial therapy and age > 50 years were the only factors associated with mortality in a multivariate analysis. Blood cultures in patients with VAP are clearly useful if there is suspicion of another probable infectious condition, but the isolation of a microorganism in the blood does not confirm that microorganism as the pathogen causing VAP.     

Bacteremia with esophageal dilation

(GUMMI BEARS)Background: Antibiotic prophylaxis has been recommended for selected patients undergoing esophageal stricture dilation because of a reported high rate of bacteremia. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of bacteremia after esophageal dilatation in a large series and the source of the organisms recovered. Methods: Blood cultures and oral temperatures were obtained before esophageal dilation and at 5 and 30 minutes after dilation. Dilators were cultured immediately before dilation. Procedural data collected included type of dilation, number of passes, and presence of malignancy. Results: Of 100 procedures in 86 patients undergoing esophageal dilation, 22 (22%) were associated with a positive post-dilation blood culture. Bacteremia was more frequent with dilation of malignant strictures compared with benign strictures (9 of 17 [52.9%] vs. 13 of 83 [15.7%], respectively, p = 0.002) and with passage of multiple dilators compared with passage of a single dilator (16 of 46 [34.8%] versus 6 of 54 [11.1%], respectively, p = 0.007). Bacterial isolates from 22 positive blood cultures matched those from a dilator in only one episode (4.5%). Conclusion: The rate of bacteremia after esophageal dilation is 22% and is associated with dilation of malignant strictures or passage of multiple dilators. Organisms cultured from the blood are not transmitted from the dilator. (Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:563-7.)     

LOW‐FREQUENCY OF BACTEREMIA AFTER ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION OF THE STOMACH

Background: Mainstream therapy for early gastric cancer in Japan has now shifted from endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Although bacteremia is reported as being infrequent and transient in gastric EMR, there are no reports of it being investigated in gastric ESD. This study aimed to determine the frequency of bacteremia in gastric ESD. Patients and Methods: A prospective study, in 46 consecutive patients who underwent gastric ESD, investigated the frequency of bacteremia before and after the procedure. Results: The median time for the total ESD procedure was 105 min (range 30–400). The median volume of the submucosal injection was 80 ml (range 20–260). The mean size of the resected specimen was 40 ± 9.7 mm. Blood cultures obtained before ESD were positive in 4.4% (2/45) of cases. Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus spp. were the isolated microorganisms. Blood cultures obtained 10 min after ESD were positive in 4.3% (2/46) of cases; with the same microorganisms being isolated. Blood cultures obtained 3 h after ESD were all negative. No signs of sepsis were seen in the two patients with a positive blood culture 10 min after ESD. Conclusions: The frequency of bacteremia after gastric ESD was low and transient. ESD for gastric lesions is thought to have a low risk of infectious complications; therefore, prophylactic administration of antibiotics may not be warranted.