Complications of the Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: 1,040 Patients - What Have We Learned?

Background:The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is one of the most common operations for morbid obesity. Laparoscopic techniques have been reported, but suffer from small numbers of patients, longer operative times and seemingly higher initial complication rates as compared to the traditional "open" procedure. The minimally invasive approach continues to be a challenge even to the most experienced laparoscopic surgeons.The purpose of this study is to describe our experience and complications of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with a totally hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy. Methods: 1,040 consecutive laparoscopic procedures were evaluated prospectively. Only patients who had a previous open gastric procedure were excluded initially. Eventually, even patients with failed "open" bariatric procedures and other gastric procedures were revised laparoscopically to the RYGBP. All patients met NIH criteria for consideration for weight reductive surgery. Results:There were no anastomotic leaks from the hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy. Early complications and open conversions were related to sub-optimal exposure and bowel fixation techniques. Several staple failures were attributed to a manufacturer redesign of an instrument. Average hospital stay was 1.9 days for all patients and 1.5 days for patients without complications. Operative times consistently approach 60 minutes. Average excess weight loss was 70% at 12 months.There were 5 deaths: perioperative pulmonary embolism (1), late pulmonary embolism (2), asthma (1), and suicide (1). Conclusions: The laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity with a totally hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy can be safely performed by the bariatric surgeon with advanced laparoscopic skills in the community setting. Fixation and closure of all potential hernia sites with non-absorbable sutures is essential. Stenosis of the hand-sewn gastrojejunal anastomosis is amenable to endoscopic balloon dilation. Meticulous attention must be paid to the operative and perioperative care of the patient.     

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding

The introduction of laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding (LASGB) has recently revolutionized gastric restrictive procedures in the treatment of morbid obesity. We analysed the short and long term results of this minimally invasive bariatric procedure. A total of 652 patients with a body mass of (median) 45 kg/m(2) were treated. There were only minor preoperative incidents. One patient died more than one month after the procedure. Early postoperative complications included 2 gastric perforations caused by a nasogastric tube and one early slipping of the band. Late complications occurred in 7% of the patients: 25 patients suffered a pouch dilation, 2 patients had gastric erosion by the band; 18 patients had port complications requiring reoperation. Loss of excess weight was 62% at 2 years. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is a safe and effective treatment for morbid obesity. The most frequent complication is pouch dilation. Further study is warranted for the evaluation of long term results.     

The state of the art in bariatric surgery for weight loss in the morbidly obese patient

Bariatric surgery is a safe and effective method for achieving durable weight loss for patients with morbid obesity. Gastric restrictive procedures include vertical banded gastroplasty and gastric banding. Malabsorptive procedures include long-limb gastric bypass, biliopancreatic diversion, and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. The gastric bypass has features of both restriction and malabsorption. The laparoscopic approach to bariatric surgery has substantially improved postoperative recovery. Careful patient selection and preoperative work-up are extremely important. A number of medical comorbidities are improved after surgically-induced weight loss.     

Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity: a randomized prospective study

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the results of open versus laparoscopic gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Gastric bypass is one of the most commonly acknowledged surgical techniques for the management of morbid obesity. It is usually performed as an open surgery procedure, although now some groups perform it via the laparoscopic approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 1999 and January 2002 we conducted a randomized prospective study in 104 patients diagnosed with morbid obesity. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 1 group with gastric bypass via the open approach (OGBP) comprising 51 patients, and 1 group with gastric bypass via the laparoscopic approach (LGBP) comprising 53 patients. The parameters compared were as follows: operating time, intraoperative complications, early (<30 days) and late (>30 days) postoperative complications, hospital stay, and short-term evolution of body mass index. RESULTS: Mean operating time was 186.4 minutes (125-290) in the LGBP group and 201.7 minutes (129-310) in the OGBP group (P < 0.05). Conversion to laparotomy was necessary in 8% of the LGBP patients. Early postoperative complications (<30 days) occurred in 22.6% of the LGBP group compared with 29.4% of the OGBP group, with no significant differences. Late complications (>30 days) occurred in 11% of the LGBP group compared with 24% of the OGBP group (P < 0.05). The differences observed between the 2 groups are the result of a high incidence of abdominal wall hernias in the OGBP group. Mean hospital stay was 5.2 days (1-13) in the LGBP group and 7.9 days (2-28) in the OGBP group (P < 0.05). Evolution of body mass index during a mean follow-up of 23 months was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: LGBP is a good surgical technique for the management of morbid obesity and has clear advantages over OGBP, such as a reduction in abdominal wall complications and a shorter hospital stay. The midterm weight loss is similar with both techniques. One inconvenience is that LGBP has a more complex learning curve than other advanced laparoscopic techniques, which may be associated with an increase in postoperative complications.     

Laparoscopic fundoplication compared with laparoscopic gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

BackgroundGastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is commonly associated with morbid obesity. Laparoscopic fundoplication is a standard surgical treatment for GERD, and laparoscopic gastric bypass has been shown to effectively resolve GERD symptoms in the morbidly obese. We sought to compare the in-hospital outcomes of morbidly obese patients who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication for the treatment of GERD versus laparoscopic gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity and related conditions, including GERD, at U.S. academic medical centers.MethodsUsing the “International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision” procedural and diagnoses codes for morbidly obese patients with GERD, we obtained data from the University HealthSystem Consortium database for all patients who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication or laparoscopic gastric bypass from October 2004 to December 2007 (n = 27,264). The outcome measures included the patient demographics, length of stay, in-hospital overall complications, mortality, risk-adjusted mortality ratio (observed to expected mortality), and hospital costs.ResultsCompared with the patients who underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass, those who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication had a lower severity of illness score (P <.05). The overall in-hospital complications were significantly lower in the laparoscopic gastric bypass group (P <.05). The mean length of stay, observed mortality, risk-adjusted mortality, and hospital costs were comparable between the 2 treatment groups.ConclusionLaparoscopic gastric bypass is as safe as laparoscopic fundoplication for the treatment of GERD in the morbidly obese. Hence, morbidly obese patients with GERD should be referred for bariatric surgery evaluation and offered laparoscopic gastric bypass as a surgical option.     

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a case report at one-year follow-up

Surgery is the only treatment for morbid obesity that has been proven to achieve a significant long-term weight loss. The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure has been performed for the treatment of morbid obesity over the past two decades with excellent results. Wound complications and perioperative morbidity remain unresolved problems of the procedure. A laparoscopic approach to this procedure has great potential to minimize the complications of this highly effective technique. We describe a laparoscopically performed Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in a 28-year-old woman with morbid obesity. The technique described here preserves the anatomic construct of the operation but introduces the benefit of the laparoscopic approach.     

Perioperative outcomes and risk factors in gastric surgery for morbid obesity: a 9-year experience

OBJECTIVE: Surgical treatment of severe obesity is the most rapidly growing specialty area of surgery. The rapid expansion of bariatric surgery has raised questions and concerns regarding possible increased surgical mortality and morbidity rates in both academic and community settings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate postoperative outcomes and risk factors for bariatric gastric surgery for severe obesity. METHODS: A community experience of 1009 consecutive patients who underwent open surgical treatment of morbid obesity during a 9-year period was reviewed from a prospective database. The series included 858 primary gastric bypass operations and 151 revision operations. Perioperative outcomes, late complications, and weight loss results were recorded. Morbidity and mortality rates were analyzed according to patient age, body mass index (BMI), and gender. RESULTS: The mortality rate in the series was 0.6%, and the morbidity rate was 20%. The major complication rate was 6.6%. There were no deaths in the 151 revision patients. The gastrointestinal leak rate was 0.8%, and the thromboembolism rate was 1%. Statistical analysis indicates that BMI is a risk factor for surgical complications. CONCLUSION: Open gastric surgery for morbid obesity can be carried out in the community setting with low mortality and morbidity rates. BMI is a proven surgical risk factor.     

Five-Year Follow-up after Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric and Partial Ileal Bypass for Treatment of Morbid Obesity and Uncontrolled Hyperlipidemia

BACKGROUND: Morbid obesity is associated with significant co-morbid illnesses and mortality. Hyperlipidemia is strongly associated with atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a proven and effective procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity and its related co-morbid illnesses. In a randomized prospective clinical trial, partial ileal bypass showed sustained control of hyperlipidemia and reduced comorbidities. Given risks of surgery, pharmacologic agents are the current primary therapy for hyperlipidemia. However, a morbidly obese patient with medically refractory hyperlipidemia may benefit from a combined laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and partial ileal bypass. We are describing the first case of a totally laparoscopic approach. METHODS: A 56-year-old female patient with morbid obesity (BMI 45.2 kg/m(2)) and medically refractive hyperlipidemia underwent a combined LRYGB and partial ileal bypass in 2002. She was continuously followed for 5 years for weight profile, hyperlipidemia, post-operative complications, and morbidity. RESULTS: Five-year follow-up of the patient showed sustained excess body weight loss. Her lipid profile has approached normal ranges with less medication. She experienced no comorbidities related to surgery or hyperlipidemia. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and partial ileal bypass may be the best option for the patient who has morbid obesity and medically refractory hyperlipidemia and should be considered for select patients.     

Hyperinsulinism, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, and the enteroinsular axis in morbidly obese patients before and after gastric bypass

The role of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) in the hyperinsulinism of morbid obesity and its correction after gastric bypass was studied in 12 morbidly obese (150 +/- 15 kg) patients. After oral glucose, significant increases in serum glucose, insulin, and GIP levels occurred both before and after gastric bypass. Compared with preoperative values, fasting concentrations and integrated incremental areas for glucose, insulin, and GIP were decreased after a 25% weight loss after gastric bypass. The hyperinsulinism of morbid obesity and its amelioration after gastric bypass may be caused by markedly elevated levels of GIP before surgery and its reduced release after bypass. Reduced release of GIP after gastric bypass may partly occur because of exclusion of ingested glucose from contact with the mucosa of the duodenum and proximal jejunum, sites with the highest concentration of GIP.     

Endoscopic T-tube placement in the management of lye-induced esophageal perforation: Case report of a safe treatment strategy

Background

The use of bariatric surgery in the management of morbid obesity is rapidly increasing. The two most frequently performed procedures are laparoscopic Roux-en-Y bypass and laparoscopic gastric banding. The objective of this short overview is to provide a critical appraisal of the most relevant scientific evidence comparing laparoscopic gastric banding versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y bypass in the treatment of morbidly obese patients.

Results and discussion

There is mounting and convincing evidence that laparoscopic gastric banding is suboptimal at best in the management of morbid obesity. Although short-term morbidity is low and hospital length of stay is short, the rates of long-term complications and band removals are high, and failure to lose weight after laparoscopic gastric banding is prevalent.

Conclusion

The placement of a gastric band appears to be a disservice to many morbidly obese patients and therefore, in the current culture of evidence based medicine, the prevalent use of laparoscopic gastric banding can no longer be justified. Based on the current scientific literature, the laparoscopic gastric bypass should be considered the treatment of choice in the management of morbidly obese patients.     

Conversion surgery for morbid obesity: complications and long-term weight control

Some operations for morbid obesity fail--for a variety of reasons. To better understand the risk and efficacy of converting, during a single operation, a failed procedure to a second type of operation for morbid obesity, a review was made of all 120 patients who underwent this type of conversion surgery at one university hospital during a 10-year period. The initial operations of 62 patients were converted to a gastric bypass with a Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy, 11 to an unbanded gastrogastrostomy, and 47 to a vertical banded gastroplasty. Four patients are dead (three of unrelated causes), 11 have undergone a third operation for morbid obesity, and five (4.2%) are lost to follow-up. For 69 of 86 patients, 3- to 5-year follow-up data are available. Serious early complications occurred in 5.8% of the patients. Almost 80% of the patients who received an unbanded gastrogastroplasty did not control their weight, whereas most of those who received a Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy or a vertical banded gastroplasty had satisfactory long-term weight control 3 to 5 years later, maintaining an average weight loss of 30% of their original weight or 55% of their excess weight. Conversion surgery is safe and effective.     

Laparoscopic gastric bypass for refractory morbid obesity

Morbid obesity has reached epidemic proportions in the United States. Laparoscopic gastric bypass is rapidly becoming the procedure of choice for treatment of morbid obesity. Results demonstrate that the surgery is technically safe. Outcomes are similar to open gastric bypass,but with markedly lower incidences of wound-related and cardiopulmonary complications. Patients also have shorter hospital stay, decreased pain and faster recovery.     

Utility of Divided Omentum for Preventing Complications Associated with Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass

Background Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass has emerged as a standard surgical treatment for morbid obesity. However, prevention of postoperative complications associated with bariatric surgery is an important consideration. Methods To reduce postoperative complications and achieve adequate body weight loss, we introduce a simple procedure using a divided omentum during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The actual aim of this procedure is to prevent leakage from the gastric pouch or anastomosis and the gastro-gastric fistula because of reentry of the alimentary tract. Between February 2002 and April 2007, we performed laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity in 94 patients. In the most recent 83 cases, our simple procedure using a divided omentum was employed. Results These patients comprised 20 males and 63 females, with a mean age of 38 years, and a mean body mass index of 44.1 kg/m². At surgery, the omentum is routinely divided using laparoscopic coagulating shears before performing gastrojejunostomy to reduce the tension on the anastomosis caused by the route of reconstruction. After performing hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy, the left side of the divided omentum is moved cranially and interposed between the gastric pouch and the excluded stomach. The omentum is then sutured from the posterior aspect of the gastric pouch to the anterior side of the anastomosis. Conclusion Our procedure using a divided omentum during bariatric surgery is feasible and safe for obtaining better outcomes without artificial materials. Although the long-term outcome of this technique is still unclear, we believe that it will contribute to decreasing the particular complications related to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity.     

Gastric bypass combined with reversal of intestinal bypass for morbid obesity

Many of the estimated 100,000 patients in the United States who have had jejunoileal bypass (JIB) for morbid obesity will develop lifethreatening complications which require that the JIB be reversed. To avoid the nearly certain recurrence of morbid obesity after reversal of JIB, gastric bypass (GB) was done at the time of the reversal in 19 patients. All patients are alive and healthy. There were no immediate serious postoperative complications. The arthritis, electrolyte imbalance, and multiple gastrointestinal symptoms (bloating, diarrhea, and flatulence) caused by JIB were immediately relieved. Patient acceptance of GB has been gratifying, and most patients continue to maintain a satisfactory weight reduction. The most significant late complication has been disruption of the gastric staple line, which was diagnosed in 4 patients 2 to 21 months after operation. All 4 patients were reoperated upon because of rapid gain in weight following the disruption. The staple line disruption is probably due to repeated overeating and, therefore, overdistention of the small gastric pouch. It is safe and prudent to perform GB in most patients when the JIB must be reversed.     

Gastric partitioning for morbid obesity.

The complication rate in jejunoileal bypass for morbid obesity is unacceptably high. Gastric bypass is technically difficult. In our series, 115 patients have undergone gastric partitioning for morbid obesity. The operation consists of stapling across the stomach below the gastroesophageal junction, leaving a gastric food reservoir of 50--60 cc. A 1 cm opening is left in the central portion of the staple line, allowing slow emptying into the distal stomach. The result is a reduced eating capacity and frequency which produce loss in weight. Three-quarters of the patients are women, and the age range is 17--62 years. Preoperative weights averaged 147 kg. Mean operative time was 48 minutes, and postoperative stay was 6.2 days. All patients were extensively evaluated preoperatively with upper GI series, cholecystogram, a number of blood chemistry tests, and endocrinologic and psychiatric consultations. All patients underwent a preoperative Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory test. Cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis was performed on 18% of the patients at the time of operation. Of the seven patients operated on more than one year ago, five have lost an average of 31.6% of their preoperative weight. Of the 12 operated on less than one year but more than six months ago, eight have lost an average of 21% of their initial weight. The early failure rate of 33% has been reduced to 15% at present. One death occurred from pulmonary embolus 10 days following discharge, giving a mortality rate of .08%. The complication rate is 10%, comprising two pulmonary emboli, two psychoses, one wound dehiscence, one wound hernia, and ten wound infections, six of which were minor. There have been no complications of ulcer disease, reflux esophagitis, liver disease, renal disease, or metabolic disorders. Gastric partitioning is a safe, fast effective alternative for the surgical treatment of morbid obesity.     

Laparoscopic gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity. Preliminary results of a new technique

INTRODUCTION: Gastric bypass is one of the most commonly used surgical techniques for the management of morbid obesity. It is usually done as an open surgery procedure, and in recent years surgeons have begun to perform it via the laparoscopic approach. The aim of this paper is to describe our surgical technique for laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGBP) and present the short-term results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2000 and January 2002 we operated on 50 patients with morbid obesity who met criteria for bariatric surgery. The patients had a mean age of 34 years and a body mass index (BMI) of 47. RESULTS: Conversion was necessary in 4 of the 50 patients (8%). Mean operating time was 181 min, with a difference of 60 min between the first 10 and last 10 cases. There was a 26% rate of complications, 14% of which were early (%<% 30 days) and 12% late (%>%30 days). Mean hospital stay was 4.5 days. CONCLUSION: LGBP is a technique with good short-term results as far as weight loss is concerned, although it has one of the most complex learning curves in laparoscopic surgery. Surgeons who regard gastric bypass as the technique of choice for the surgical management of morbid obesity should consider performing it via the laparoscopic approach.     

A prospective comparison of gastric and jejunoileal bypass procedures for morbid obesity.

A randomized prospective evaluation of the gastric and jejunoileal bypass procedures for morbid obesity was performed. The gastric bypass was performed predominantly as a 90% gastric exclusion with a Roux-en-Y reconstitution. The jejunoileal bypass was an end-to-end anastomosis between 30 cm of jejunum and 25 cm of terminal ileum, the bypassed segment of small bowel being decompressed by an end-to-side ileocolostomy. There were 32 patients in the gastric group and 27 in the jejunoileal group. The two groups were comparable in age, preoperative weight and height. There were no postoperative deaths, but the gastric bypass operation was associated with a slightly higher early complication rate indicating it is a more technically demanding procedure. Late sequellae were more prominent in the jejunoileal bypass group and included significant diarrhea in 56% and need for medication in 74%. Kidney stones and cholelithiasis also complicated the jejunoileal group and were not seen after gastric bypass. All patients showed fatty metamorphosis on the original liver biopsy. This had worsened in 75% of the jejunoileal group at one year whereas it had improved or was stable in all of the patients in the gastric group.     

��ǻ������θ��·�����Ƶ����Է��ֲ�2������

目的 报告成功实施腹腔镜迷你胃旁路术治疗单纯性肥胖并2型糖尿病病人1例。方法 第二军医大学附属长海医院微创外科于2007年11月对1例伴有2型糖尿病的单纯性肥胖症病人行腹腔镜迷你胃旁路术。结果 病人手术顺利，手术时间135min，术中出血20mL。术后30d内无手术并发症，随访30d，体重下降15kg，体重指数（BMI）减少4．9。术后第8天停用一切降糖药物，各项糖尿病检查指标均正常。结论 腹腔镜迷你胃旁路术是相对安全、简单的术式，近期减重效果良好，对2型糖尿病具有很好的治疗效果。     

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A 7-year Retrospective Review of 3855 Patients

Background: 3855 patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity between 1988 and 1994 are presented. Methods: All patients were sent a standard questionnaire reflecting current weight, intervening complications and general health status and 1039 patients responded. Information gleaned from review of these questionnaires and a review of individual charts provided the data for this study. Results: Average weight loss at 1 year was 46 kg and at 5 years was 34.5 kg. Operative mortality was 0.18%. Surgical morbidity rate was 3.4%. Average length of stay for patients hospitalized in 1994 was 3.6 days. The average operating time during that same year was 78 min, and the average hospital charges were $7250. Conclusions: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass can be performed with relative safety and acceptable morbidity. There is a demonstrable weight loss benefit which is maintained in the majority of patients over a period greater than 5 years. The expense and consumption of provider services are modest, and this procedure remains an excellent alternative for weight control among morbidly obese individuals.     

Short-term Results of Laparoscopic Mini-Gastric Bypass

Background: The laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (MGB) is a modification of Mason's loop gastric bypass, but with a long lesser curvature tube. With weight loss results similar to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP), the MGB is a simpler operation with a low complication rate. Controversy exists concerning the efficacy and side-effects of this procedure. This report presents the technique of laparoscopic MGB and its results in 423 patients. Methods: From October 2001 to October 2004, 423 consecutive patients (87 males and 336 females) underwent laparoscopic MGB (LMGB) for morbid obesity. Mean age was 30.8 years, preoperative mean weight 120.3 kg and mean BMI 44.2 kg/m². Results: All procedures were completed laparoscopically. Mean operative time was 130.8 minutes, and mean hospital stay was 5.0 days. 18 minor early complications (4.3%) were encountered, and 7 major complications (1.7%) occurred. Marginal ulcers were noted in 34 patients (8.0%) during follow-up, and anemia was found in 41 patients (9.7%). Mean BMI decreased to 29.2 and 28.4 kg/m² at 1-year and 2-year follow-up, with mean excess weight loss 69.3% and 72.2%. The Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index improved significantly 1 year after the operation. Conclusions: LMGB has a low complication and mortality rate. The learning curve is less steep than for LRYGBP, whereas the efficacy is similar.