The prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR) Line: derivation of local INR with commercial thromboplastins and coagulometers – two independent studies

Summary. Background: The WHO scheme for prothrombin time (PT) standardization has been limited in application, because of its difficulties in implementation, particularly the need for mandatory manual PT testing and for local provision of thromboplastin international reference preparations (IRP). Methods: The value of a new simpler procedure to derive international normalized ratio (INR), the PT/INR Line, based on only five European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA) calibrant plasmas certified by experienced centres has been assessed in two independent exercises using a range of commercial thromboplastins and coagulometers. INRs were compared with manual certified values with thromboplastin IRP from expert centres and in the second study also with INRs from local ISI calibrations. Results: In the first study with the PT/INR Line, 8.7% deviation from certified INRs was reduced to 1.1% with human reagents, and from 7.0% to 2.6% with rabbit reagents. In the second study, deviation was reduced from 11.2% to 0.4% with human reagents by both local ISI calibration and the PT/INR Line. With rabbit reagents, 10.4% deviation was reduced to 1.1% with both procedures; 4.9% deviation was reduced to 0.5% with bovine/combined reagents with local ISI calibrations and to 2.9% with the PT/INR Line. Mean INR dispersion was reduced with all thromboplastins and automated systems using the PT/INR Line. Conclusions: The procedure using the PT/INR Line provides reliable INR derivation without the need for WHO ISI calibration across the range of locally used commercial thromboplastins and automated PT systems included in two independent international studies.     

Coagulometer international sensitivity index (ISI) derivation,a rapid method using the prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR) Line: a multicenter study

Summary. Background: The original WHO procedure for prothrombin time (PT) standardization has been almost entirely abandoned because of the universal use of PT coagulometers. These often give different international normalized ratio (INR) results from the manual method, between individual makes of instruments and with instruments from the same manufacture. Method A simple procedure is required to derive local INR with coagulometers. The PT/INR Line method has recently been developed using five European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA) certified plasmas to derive local INR. This procedure has been modified to derive a coagulometer PT/INR Line providing International Sensitivity Index (ISI) and mean normal PT (MNPT) for coagulometers and give local INR. Results have been compared with conventional ISI calibrations at the same laboratories. Results: With human thromboplastins, mean ISI by local calibration was 0.93 (range: 0.77–1.16). With the PT/INR Line, mean coagulometer ISI was higher, for example 0.99 (0.84–1.23) but using the PT/INR Line derived MNPT there was no difference in local INR. Between‐centre INR variation of a certified validation plasma was reduced with human and bovine reagents after correction with local ISI calibrations and the PT/INR Line. Conclusion: The PT/INR Line–ISI with its derived MNPT is shown to provide reliable local INR with the 13 different reagent/coagulometer combinations at the 28 centres in this international study.     

Comparison of local International Sensitivity Index calibration and ''Direct INR'' methods in correction of locally reported International Normalized Ratios: an international study

BACKGROUND: It is no longer feasible to check local International Normalized Ratios (INR) by the World Health Organization International Sensitivity Index (ISI) calibrations because the necessary manual prothrombin time technique required has generally been discarded. OBJECTIVES: An international collaborative study at 77 centers has compared local INR correction using the two alternative methods recommended in the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis guidelines: local ISI calibration and 'Direct INR'. METHODS: Success of INR correction by local ISI calibration and with Direct INR was assessed with a set of 27 certified lyophilized plasmas (20 from patients on warfarin and seven from normals). RESULTS: At 49 centers using human thromboplastins, 3.0% initial average local INR deviation from certified INR was reduced by local ISI calibration to 0.7%, and at 25 centers using rabbit reagents, from 15.9% to 7.5%. With a minority of commercial thromboplastins, mainly 'combined' rabbit reagents, INR correction was not achieved by local ISI calibration. However, when rabbit combined reagents were excluded the overall mean INR deviation after correction was reduced further to 3.9%. In contrast, with Direct INR, mean deviation using human thromboplastins increased from 3.0% to 6.6%, but there was some reduction with rabbit reagents from 15.9% to 10% (12.3% with combined reagents excluded). CONCLUSIONS: Local ISI calibration gave INR correction for the majority of PT systems but failed at the small number using combined rabbit reagents suggesting a need for a combined reference thromboplastin. Direct INR correction was disappointing but better than local ISI calibration with combined rabbit reagents. Interlaboratory variability was improved by both procedures with human reagents only.     

Inaccuracy of international normalized ratio (INR) measurements and suggestions for improved WHO guidelines for calibration of reference preparations – a statistical study

Summary.  Numerous empirical studies show that the accuracy of international normalized ratio (INR) measurements is unsatisfactory and worse than generally expected. We demonstrate that a plausible reason for this large inaccuracy is a conventional calibration procedure of reference preparations with (i) an erroneous assumption that the line relating logarithmic prothrombin times (log PTs) of patients passes through the mean log PT of the 'normal' population (mean normal PT); (ii) non-perceived interactions between patients and PT systems; and (iii) systematic exclusions of 'outliers'. The same conventional procedure also results in serious overestimation of the accuracy of INR measurements, thus leading to a false sense of security in oral anticoagulant therapy. In an example with data from WHO guidelines, we show that the systematic overprediction of INR (which is believed to be 0) may be as large as 5%, when prediction is performed under the conventional WHO model. Under the same model the CV of the predicted vs. the true INR is believed to be only about 1% when it in reality is more than 4%. We suggest that the conventional calibration procedure is modified in order to reduce the twofold negative impact of lower true accuracy and overestimated reported accuracy on oral anticoagulant therapy and to allow for an unambiguous definition of true INR values.     

A comparison of INRs after local calibration of thromboplastin international sensitivity indexes.

There are approximately 300 reagent/instrument combinations for performing prothrombin times/international normalized ratios (PT/INR) in the United States. Manufacturers and laboratories continually struggle to ensure that the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) of their thromboplastin is accurate for assaying PT/INR. OBJECTIVE: This study reports the feasibility of a new method to locally calibrate ISI of thromboplastin using the mechanical STA automated coagulation analyzer (Diagnostica-Stago Inc.) and two photo-optic coagulation analyzers, the BCS (Dade-Behring) and CA-540 (Sysmex). DESIGN: Neoplastine CI+ (CI+) (Diagnostica-Stago Inc); Thromboplastin C+ (TC+); Thromborel S (TRS); and Innovin (I) (Dade-Behring) were used in this study. A mean normal PT (MNPT) was determined for each reagent/instrument combination using samples from 25 normal individuals. Manufacturer instrument specific ISI values were not available for the STA with TC+, TRS and I. The CA540 had no ISI value for CI+ and the BCS system had no manufacturer assigned ISI values for TC+ and I; generic photo-optic and mechanical ISI manufacturer values were used for these two systems. Local on-site calibration was performed using frozen plasma calibrators to determine ISI values for each thromboplastin. Post-calibration, 95 patient samples were assayed for each reagent/instrument system combination using the manufacturer ISI and the local calibrated ISI to determine the INR result. PATIENTS: Patients from whom samples were obtained included five with a lupus anticoagulant, 30 on heparin therapy, and 60 on coumadin therapy. RESULTS: Differences between manufacturer versus local calibrated ISI ranged from 0.9% to 18.9% for normal sample INRs and from 0.8% to 16.4% for patient sample INRs. The number (or proportion) of patient specimens with clinically significantly different INR values (>10.0% difference) ranged from zero for several reagent combinations to more than half (or >50.0%) of those tested for several other combinations. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that by locally calibrating ISI values, each laboratory may eliminate variability and guesswork between different reagent/instrument systems for ISI values when performing PT/INR assays and potentially improve the clinical accuracy of their patients' PT/INR results.     

European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA): an assessment of a method for ISI calibration of two whole blood point-of-care PT monitor systems based on lyophilized plasmas using whole blood equivalent PT

Summary.  Previously, the attempt to simplify the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) calibration of the CoaguChek Mini whole blood point-of-care test prothrombin time (PT) monitor system was successful using lyophilized plasmas from coumarin-treated patients but not with lyophilized artificially depleted plasmas. With the TAS PT-NC monitor system, both types of plasma failed to provide reliable calibrations. The present study assesses a procedure for the ISI calibration of a TAS PT-NC and CoaguChek Mini whole blood point-of-care test PT monitor systems using lyophilized plasmas. Using lyophilized artificially depleted and coumarin plasma calibrations, we have evaluated a correction for the monitor displayed PT. This was based on a 'line of equivalence' derived from the relationship between whole blood and fresh plasma PT with both types of monitor system. With the TAS PT-NC, the use of this 'line of equivalence' resulted in reliable ISI with both lyophilized coumarin and artificially depleted plasmas. There was no significant difference between mean monitor and mean reference International Normalized Ratio (INR) with the artificially depleted plasmas. With the lyophilized coumarin plasma calibrations there was only a small INR difference. Correction with the 'line of equivalence' therefore facilitates calibration of the TAS PT-NC with lyophilized plasmas. With the CoaguChek Mini, the correction based on the 'line of equivalence' did not improve results but was not required with this system.     

Use of lyophilized calibrant plasmas for simplified international normalized ratio determination with a human tissue factor thromboplastin reagent derived from cultured human cells

BACKGROUND: For monitoring of treatment with oral anticoagulants, the clotting time obtained in the prothrombin time (PT) test is transformed to the International Normalized Ratio (INR) with use of a system-specific International Sensitivity Index (ISI). The calibrant plasma procedure (CPP) is an alternative approach to INR calculation based on the use of a set of lyophilized plasmas with assigned INRs. METHODS: With the CPP, a linear relationship is established between log(PT) and log(INR), using orthogonal regression. CPP was validated for Simplastin HTF, a new human tissue factor reagent derived from cultured human cells. CPP precision was assessed as the CV of the slope of the regression line. The accuracy of the CPP was determined by comparing the INR obtained with the CPP with that obtained with the established ISI-based reference method. INRs of the calibrants were assigned by different routes: by manufacturer (consensus labeling) or by use of Simplastin HTF or International Reference Preparations (IRPs; rTF/95 or RBT/90). RESULTS: The mean CV of the CPP regression slope ranged from 1.0% (Simplastin HTF reagent-specific INR) to 2.4% (INR assigned with rTF/95). INRs calculated with the CPP were similar to those obtained with the reference method, but when the routes for assigning INRs to the calibrant plasmas were compared, the mean difference in INR between CPP and the reference method was smaller with Simplastin HTF reagent-specific values. In several (but not all) cases, this difference was significant (P <0.05, t-test). CONCLUSION: CPP can be used for local INR determination, but better precision and accuracy are obtained with reagent-specific INRs compared with INR assignment by consensus labeling or IRP.     

Phospholipid composition controls thromboplastin sensitivity to individual clotting factors

BACKGROUND: Tissue factor is the active ingredient in thromboplastin reagents used to perform prothrombin time (PT) clotting tests to monitor oral anticoagulant therapy and to screen for clotting factor deficiencies. Thromboplastins are complex mixtures prepared from extracts of brain or placenta, although newer thromboplastins contain recombinant tissue factor incorporated into phospholipid vesicles. Thromboplastins can vary widely in their sensitivity to reductions in the levels of vitamin K-dependent clotting factors. A system to compensate for this, the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) and International Normalized Ratio (INR), has revolutionized the monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy. The INR system is also sometimes used to monitor coagulopathies in patients with sepsis or liver failure, applications for which it was not originally designed and for which it has not been rigorously validated. OBJECTIVES: To better understand thromboplastin performance, we systematically investigated which properties of recombinant thromboplastins influence their sensitivities to changes in the levels of specific clotting factors. RESULTS: We now report that relative sensitivities to changes in the plasma levels of factors V, VII, X (FV, FVII, FX) and prothrombin are differentially influenced by a recombinant thromboplastin's content of phospholipid and sodium chloride. Furthermore, thromboplastins of similar ISI values may exhibit quite different sensitivities to each of these clotting factors. CONCLUSIONS: Differing sensitivities of thromboplastin reagents to individual clotting factor levels have implications for monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy and interpreting results of the PT assay.     

血浆凝血酶原时间测定中建立仪器区域国际敏感指数的实验探讨

目的　探讨临床口服抗凝治疗时血浆凝血酶原时间 (PT)监测的标准化 ,为临床提供比较准确的PT 国际标准化比值 (PT INR)结果。方法　使用PT INR校准血浆建立PT测定试剂在不同仪器上的区域性国际敏感度指数 (LocalISI) ,以此对新鲜血浆进行PT测定。结果　未经LocalISI校准的PT试剂测定血浆的PT时 ,INR结果差异较大 (P <0 .0 1)。试剂经LocalISI校准后 ,测定血浆PT时 ,INR结果良好 (P >0 .0 5及Kap pa >0 .75 )。 结论　在PT测定时 ,只要建立仪器和测定试剂的LocalISI ,INR结果就具有较好的一致性。     

凝血酶原时间ISI/INR系统测定中的一些问题及改进意见

目的对凝血酶原时间(PT)测定ISI/INR系统出现的一些问题提出相应的改进建议。方法对上海市12家医院在用的仪器和匹配的PT试剂,对日常使用的正常血浆平均凝血酶原时间(MNPT)作调研实测,将结果进行分析;调查试剂的仪器特定(spec ific)国际敏感度指数(ISI)值与世界卫生组织(WHO)的手工法ISI定标值之间的差异;用2种已知国际标准化比值(INR)的异常参比血浆代替WHO的ISI系统作质控并行比较。结果12家中有4家日常使用的平均正常凝血酶原时间(MNPT)明显偏离实测值,分别为0.8、0.9、1.0和1.8 s。用WHO CRM149R参比,用手工法标定的凝血活酶和109 mmol枸橼酸钠抗凝的不同PT值血标本,在Sysm ex1500型、C.2000型仪器上测定试剂的仪器特定ISI,其结果比手工法分别减少4.1%和4.7%,但采用HEPES-枸橼酸钠抗凝剂标本时,2种型号仪器的特定ISI比手工法分别减少16.7%及7.7%。用已知INR异常参比血浆,国产品与进口品对照的结果良好。结论受调研12家中,有4家血凝分析仪器调研时实测的MNPT明显偏离日常使用值。有几家医院试剂的仪器特定ISI值也存在问题,建议纠正。用已知INR异常参比血浆代替WHO手工法标定凝血活酶ISI法作质控,使用简便,又不需MNPT参数,值得推广。     

肝衰竭患者凝血酶原时间报告形式的探讨

目的 :探讨在肝衰竭病人的凝血酶原时间 (PT)以秒数、比率、活动百分率计 ,还是以国际正常化比率(INR)表示。方法 :采用 ISI 1.11,1.76和 2 .0 5的三种凝血活酶对 5 2例肝衰竭病人和 5 0例口服华法令的换瓣术后的病人进行 PT测定。以上述四种方式表示结果。结果 :肝衰竭病人 ,PT百分率能消除变异的可能性 (P<0 .0 5 ) ,而其他表示形式仍有明显的差异 (P>0 .0 1)。患者口服抗凝治疗后仅 INR能较准确地反映 PT的结果。结论 :INR不能用于表达非抗凝治疗患者的 PT结果。 PT活动的百分率是为肝衰竭病人的最好报告形式。     

凝血活酶敏感指数对凝血酶原时间测定的影响

本文观察了四种不同国际敏感指数的凝血活酶试剂，在相同条件下，对２５例正常人和５０例口服华法令病人进行了ＰＴ测定，结果显示正常参考值随所用凝血活酶的ＩＳＩ不同而异。建议各实验室应依其所用试剂建立自己实验室的正常参考值。对口服抗凝药的５０例患者测得ＰＴｓ（秒）和ＰＴＲ（比率）经方差分析，四组结果有显著性差异（Ｐ〈０．０１），而按ＩＮＲ＝ＰＴＲ＾ＩＳＩ换算成国际标准化比率（ＩＮＲ）后，经方差分析，四组Ｉ     

International normalized ratio in the prothrombin test: clinical significance and use

The safety and efficiency of therapy by peroral anticoagulants (PA) depend on a laboratory monitoring based on the prothrombin test (PT). The test is distinguished through its variability conditioned by different means of results' presentation as well as through the sensitivity of thromboplastin and a type of a device used in coagulation detection. WHO recommended, 1983, to standardize the thromboplastin preparations through adjusting their sensitivity (the so-called International Sensitivity Index--ISI) to blood coagulation defects induced by PA versus the primary international reference thromboplastin. Thromboplastin ISI as well as the mean normal prothrombin time (MNPT) of blood plasma are used to calculate the international normalized ratio (INR). The presentation of PT results as INR is justified exclusively for the PA-therapy stabilized patients. The INR system makes it possible to optimize the PA therapy only if the laboratory expert and clinician can clearly understand the PT standardization essence and observe the key WHO recommendations, i.e. definition of a coagulometer-specific ISI by manufacturing companies, estimation of MNPT by laboratories and use of the correct anticoagulant concentration.     

Determination of thromboplastin time with a new standardized thromboplastin from human placenta: results of a cooperative study

In five centres a new sensitive standardized thromboplastin from human placenta (Thromborel S) for determination of prothrombin time (PT) was evaluated on plasmas from healthy subjects, from patients on oral anticoagulant therapy and from patients with different diseases, especially of the liver. The standardization of the human placenta thromboplastin (HPT) for prothrombin time determination was performed by comparison with a lot of the Reference Preparation British Comparative Thromboplastin (BCT). The obtained International Sensitivity Index (ISI) for 14 differents lots of the new thromboplastin varied between 1.04 and 1.29 (mean value: 1.16). The reagent is highly sensitive to the factors of the extrinsic coagulation pathway and is not affected by heparin at least up to 0.6 IU/ml. From the comparison with the British Comparative Thromboplastin lot No. 235, a therapeutical range for the stable phase of the oral anticoagulation of 2.4-4.0 prothrombin ratio or 15-27% of normal, respectively, was obtained. Comparison of prothrombin time determination using the Human Placental Thromboplastin and the British Comparative Thromboplastin lot No. 235 in 330 patients on oral anticoagulation showed good correlations either in "percent normal" or in prothrombin ratio.     

广东省凝血酶原时间测定的室间质量评价

目的 探讨广东省临床实验室监测凝血酶原时间（PT）的检测状况及影响PT测定室间可比性的因素.方法 通过每年两次定期向全省参评实验室寄发质控样品（每次5个样品）,然后对其回报的数据进行统计分析,作出实验室检验水平的评价.结果 近年来全省实验室间PT（INR）测定结果的CV值尽管有逐渐下降的趋势,但室间变异仍然相当高.同一凝血活酶试剂的测定结果,PT（INR）的CV明显大于PT（sec）的CV,特别是对异常水平质评物的测定.结论 凝血活酶试剂敏感度指数（ISI）值标定的不准确性和INR计算不正确的是引起广东省临床实验室间凝血酶原时间测定变异大的主要原因.     

Effect of lepirudin on the international normalized ratio

BACKGROUND: Many patients receiving direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) therapy require transition to warfarin. This transition may be complicated by DTI-induced elevations in the international normalized ratio (INR). While the effect of argatroban on the INR has been characterized, data assessing the effect of lepirudin on the INR are limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of lepirudin on the INR. METHODS: Patients receiving lepirudin therapy between January 2000 and May 2001 were identified using the pharmacy database, and a retrospective chart review was conducted. Patients were included for analysis if they had paired activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and INR data while receiving lepirudin monotherapy. RESULTS: Fifty-three paired aPTT and INR data points from 8 patients receiving lepirudin monotherapy were collected. The Organon MDA 180 instrument was used for aPTT and prothrombin time (PT) determination. Organon MDA Platelin L reagent was used for the aPTT and Organon Simplastin L reagent was used for the PT. The international sensitivity index (ISI) of the Simplastin L thromboplastin was 2.0. The mean +/- SD lepirudin dose was 0.05 +/- 0.04 mg/kg/h. Linear regression was used to identify the INRs that correspond to a therapeutic aPTT value of 45-75 seconds (1.5-2.5 times mean laboratory normal of 30 sec). The correlation between aPTT and INR was 0.77. An aPTT of 45-75 seconds with lepirudin correlated to an INR of 1.6-3.2. CONCLUSIONS: Based on laboratory results, when using a thromboplastin with an ISI of 2, lepirudin appears to elevate the INR in the absence of warfarin.     

European concerted action on anticoagulation. Use of plasma samples to derive international sensitivity index for whole-blood prothrombin time monitors.

BACKGROUND: To simplify International Sensitivity Index (ISI) calibration, the possibility of substituting fresh plasma for fresh whole-blood samples with point-of-care testing (POCT) whole-blood monitors was investigated in a three-center study of three different POCT systems. METHODS: A modified full WHO calibration procedure based on 20 healthy controls and 60 coumarin-treated patients was performed on three monitoring systems with whole-blood and plasma samples against plasma tested using the European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA) rabbit reference plain thromboplastin and the manual prothrombin time (PT) method. RESULTS: With one of the three systems, the mean ISI was 1.51 for whole blood and 1.49 for plasma; with the second system, the mean ISI was 1.08 for both whole blood and plasma. With the third system, however, the difference between the mean ISI for whole blood and that for plasma was greater (1.15 and 1.01, respectively). Overall, the precision of the calibrations was less than with traditional manual plasma PT testing. CONCLUSIONS: Provided that an appropriate calcium chloride concentration is used, the plasma PT results can be used for accurate ISI calibration of two of these three whole-blood POCT systems. Precision criteria need to be modified for POCT monitors.     

Quality assessment of CoaguChek point-of-care prothrombin time monitors: comparison of the European community-approved procedure and conventional external quality assessment

BACKGROUND: There is a need for dependable quality assessment (QA) of the widely used CoaguChek point-of-care testing prothrombin time monitor. By use of the prescribed set of 5 CoaguChek certified international normalized ratio (INR) QA plasmas, we compared the reliability of the immediate QA of individual monitors described in the European Community-recommended Technology Implementation Plan with conventional external QA analysis. METHODS: Experienced staff tested CoaguChek point-of-care monitors in routine use for controlling oral anticoagulant dosage at 9 Netherlands Thrombosis Service Centres. Testing was performed with both the certified CoaguChek INR for a set of 5 QA individual plasmas from the Eur Con Action on Anticoag (ECAA) and conventional external QA analysis. RESULTS: Patients brought 523 CoaguChek monitors to our service centers for assessment. The proportion with unsatisfactory performance indicated by a 15% deviation from the ECAA set was compared with 15% deviation from overall median INR of all CoaguChek monitors in the survey, as in conventional QA analysis. The results were similar (20.3% and 18.5%, respectively). Interlot differences of CoaguChek test strips were detected, but the incidence of unsatisfactory performance was similar with both analyses, from 6.5% to 37.5% with the certified INR method and from 5.9% to 33.3% with the overall median analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The results validate the use of the European Action on Anticoagulation rapid single-instrument QA-specific procedure for CoaguChek users compared with the nonspecific conventional QA analysis that relies on deviation from the overall median INR.     

Properties of recombinant human thromboplastin that determine the International Sensitivity Index (ISI)

Prothrombin Time (PT) clotting tests are widely used to monitor oral anticoagulation therapy and to screen for clotting factor deficiencies. The active ingredient in PT reagents (thromboplastins) is tissue factor, the integral membrane protein that triggers the clotting cascade through the extrinsic pathway. Several years ago, a system for calibrating and using thromboplastin reagents, known as the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) and the International Normalized Ratio (INR), was developed to standardize monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy. The ISI/INR method, while revolutionizing the monitoring of coumarin therapy, has been criticized for a number of perceived shortcomings. We have undertaken a series of studies aimed at achieving a detailed understanding of which parameters influence the ISI values of thromboplastin reagents, with an ultimate goal of creating 'designer thromboplastins' whose sensitivities to the various clotting factors can be individually tailored. In this study, we demonstrate that ISI values of thromboplastin reagents based on relipidated, recombinant human tissue factor can be controlled by a combination of changes in the phospholipid content (in particular, the levels of phosphatidylserine and phosphatidylethanolamine) and ionic strength. The sensitivity of a given thromboplastin reagent can be increased (i.e. its ISI value decreased) by decreasing the content of phosphatidylserine and/or increasing the ionic strength. The molar ratio of phospholipid to tissue factor, on the other hand, had essentially no impact on ISI value.     

The international normalized ratio to prioritize patients for liver transplantation: problems and possible solutions

Summary.  The prothrombin time (PT) test once designed by Dr Quick to investigate patients with obstructive jaundice was later adapted and standardized by means of the international normalized ratio (INR) to monitor patients on treatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKA). After more than 70 years from its introduction it is now time to think about its standardization for those very patients for whom it was intended at the beginning of its history. Two studies carried out independently and published recently in the same issue of a specialized journal do exploit the very same idea on how to accomplish this standardization. Both of them confirm previous anecdotal observations that the INR as devised for patients on VKA (INR_vka) is not valid to harmonize PT results for patients with chronic liver disease. This fact, that at first sight may appear academic, has important consequences because the PT INR is used to construct the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores, which is widely used to prioritize patients for liver transplantation. The two studies further demonstrate that an alternative calibration model, modified from that recommended by the World Health Organization for patients on VKA, may be feasible also for patients with chronic liver disease. This alternative calibration model, which calls for the substitution of plasmas from patients on VKA with those from patients with chronic liver disease, may be highly beneficial to harmonize the calculation of the MELD score, with important implications for the prioritization of patients for liver transplantation.