A comprehensive model for familial breast cancer incorporating BRCA1, BRCA2 and other genes

In computing the probability that a woman is a BRCA1 or BRCA2 carrier for genetic counselling purposes, it is important to allow for the fact that other breast cancer susceptibility genes may exist. We used data from both a population based series of breast cancer cases and high risk families in the UK, with information on BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status, to investigate the genetic models that can best explain familial breast cancer outside BRCA1 and BRCA2 families. We also evaluated the evidence for risk modifiers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. We estimated the simultaneous effects of BRCA1, BRCA2, a third hypothetical gene 'BRCA3', and a polygenic effect using segregation analysis. The hypergeometric polygenic model was used to approximate polygenic inheritance and the effect of risk modifiers. BRCA1 and BRCA2 could not explain all the observed familial clustering. The best fitting model for the residual familial breast cancer was the polygenic, although a model with a single recessive allele produced a similar fit. There was also significant evidence for a modifying effect of other genes on the risks of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Under this model, the frequency of BRCA1 was estimated to be 0.051% (95% CI: 0.021-0.125%) and of BRCA2 0.068% (95% CI: 0.033-0.141%). The breast cancer risk by age 70 years, based on the average incidence over all modifiers was estimated to be 35.3% for BRCA1 and 50.3% for BRCA2. The corresponding ovarian cancer risks were 25.9% for BRCA1 and 9.1% for BRCA2. The findings suggest that several common, low penetrance genes with multiplicative effects on risk may account for the residual non-BRCA1/2 familial aggregation of breast cancer. The modifying effect may explain the previously reported differences between population based estimates for BRCA1/2 penetrance and estimates based on high-risk families.     

Risk of cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation-positive and -negative breast cancer families (Finland)

Objectives: To compare the risk of cancer between BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation-positive and -negative families. Methods: We assessed standardized incidence ratios (SIR) in 107 Finnish breast cancer families (12 BRCA1, 11 BRCA2, 84 non-BRCA1/2) with confirmed genealogy. The observed numbers of cancer cases were compared to the expected ones; both numbers were based on the population-based Finnish Cancer Registry. Results: Risk of ovarian cancer for first-degree relatives was high in BRCA1 (SIR 29, 95% confidence interval 9.4–68) and in BRCA2 families (SIR 18, 8.3–35), but not increased for non-BRCA1/2 families (SIR 1.0, 0.2–2.9). The SIR for subsequent ovarian cancer among breast cancer patients was 61 (20–142), 38 (11–98), and 0 (0–4.2), respectively. The risk of subsequent new breast cancer among breast cancer patients was equally high in BRCA1 families (SIR 11, 3.6–26) and in BRCA2 families (SIR 10, 3.3–24) and somewhat lower in mutation-negative families (SIR 3.7, 2.1–6.1). The risk of breast cancer among relatives was markedly increased in all three groups. The only elevated SIR, besides breast and ovarian, was that for prostate cancer in BRCA2 families (SIR 4.9, 1.8–11). Conclusions: The excess risk of breast cancer in non-BRCA1/2 families suggests the existence of another predisposition gene which seems not to be linked with increased risk of ovarian cancer.     

家族性和早发性乳腺癌BRCA1基因突变分析

目的 分析中国黑龙江省家族性和早发性乳腺癌中BRCA1基因的突变情况。方法 以黑龙江地区的92例家族性和早发性乳腺癌(发病年龄≤35岁)为研究对象。由静脉血提取基因组DNA,对BRCA1基因的全部编码序列(除外1,4号外显子)进行扩增。由聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳分析(SSCP)进行突变的初筛,之后进行DNA直接测序证实。结果 在92例乳腺癌患者中发现有5种致病性突变,其中3种为新发现的突变,发现的已报道的2种突变均为无义突变。结论 在中国黑龙江人群中,BRCA1基因的突变对于遗传性乳腺癌的发生可能具有较重要意义;新发现的3个突变位点可能是中国人群中的特有突变;黑龙江地区BRCA1在家族性乳腺癌中突变率明显低于国内外报道,但其中的移码突变3712insG分别在3个患者中检出,提示有可能成为该地区的基础突变。     

Association between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and cancer phenotype in Spanish breast/ovarian cancer families: implications for genetic testing.

Index cases from a clinically relevant cohort of 102 Spanish families with at least 3 cases of breast and/or ovarian cancer (at least 1 case diagnosed before age 50) in the same lineage were screened for germline mutations in the entire coding sequence and intron boundaries of the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. Overall, the prevalence of mutations was 43% in female breast/ovarian cancer families, 15% in female breast cancer families and 100% in male breast cancer families. Three recurrent mutations (185delAG, 589delCT and A1708E) explained 63% of BRCA1-related families. Early age at diagnosis of breast cancer, ovarian cancer, bilateral breast cancer, concomitant breast/ovarian cancer in a single patient and prostate cancer but not unilateral breast cancer were associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Male breast cancer was associated with BRCA2 mutations. The presence of male breast cancer was the only cancer phenotype that distinguished BRCA2- from BRCA1-related families. We have developed a logistic regression model for predicting the probability of harbouring a mutation in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 as a function of the cancer phenotype present in the family. The predictive positive and negative values of this model were 77.4% and 79%, respectively (probability cutoff of 30%). The findings of our work may be a useful tool for increasing the cost-effectiveness of genetic testing in familial cancer clinics.     

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Turkish breast/ovarian families and young breast cancer patients

To date, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast and/or ovarian patients have not been characterized in the Turkish population. We investigated the presence of BRCA mutations in 53 individuals with a personal and family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, and 52 individuals with a personal history of breast cancer diagnosed below age 50 without additional family history. We have identified 11 mutations (nine BRCA1 and two BRCA2) using combined techniques involving protein truncation test, direct sequencing and heteroduplex analysis. We found eight out of 53 patients (15.1%) with a family history to carry BRCA gene mutations (seven BRCA1 and one BRCA2). Of these, four were found in 43 families presenting only breast cancer histories, and four were found in families presenting ovarian cancer with or without breast cancer. We also demonstrated two BRCA1 and one BRCA2 mutations in three out of 52 (5.8%) early-onset breast cancer cases without additional family history. Three of nine BRCA1 and both BRCA2 mutations detected in this study were not reported previously. These mutations may be specific to the Turkish population. The BRCA1 5382insC mutation, specific to Ashkenazi and Russian populations, was found twice in our study group, representing a possible founder mutation in the Turkish population.     

Comprehensive analysis of 989 patients with breast or ovarian cancer provides BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation profiles and frequencies for the German population.

The main focus of this German-wide multi-center study was to establish a BRCA1/2 mutation profile and to determine family types with high frequencies of mutations in these genes. In a comprehensive study, the entire coding sequences of the breast cancer genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 were analyzed in 989 unrelated patients from German breast/ovarian cancer families. A total of 77 BRCA1 and 63 BRCA2 distinct deleterious mutations were found in 302 patients. More than (1/3) of these mutations are novel and might be specific for the German population. Eighteen common mutations were found in 68% of cases in BRCA1 and 13 recurrent mutations in 44% of cases in BRCA2, facilitating prescreening approaches. Haplotype analysis indicate that 14 out of 20 recurrent mutations are likely originating from a common founder. An additional 50 different rare sequence variants with unknown relevance for tumorigenesis were found in 72 families. Correlation of BRCA1/BRCA2 detection rates with family history identified families with both breast and ovarian cancer to be at highest risk for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations (43% and 10%, respectively), followed by families with at least 2 premenopausal cases of breast cancer (24% BRCA1 and 13% BRCA2 mutations). These data provide strong evidence for further predisposing genes in the German population. In breast cancer families with 2 or 3 affected females but only a single or no premenopausal case, mutations were detected with low frequencies (about 10% or less for both genes). The decision for or against molecular diagnosis is now aided by considering the expected mutation detection rates that greatly depend on family history and structure.     

Mutations of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in patients with bilateral breast cancer

Mutations of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes have been shown to strongly predispose towards the development of contralateral breast cancer in patients from large multi-case families. In order to test the hypothesis that BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are more frequent in patients with bilateral breast cancer, we have investigated a hospital-based series of 75 consecutive patients with bilateral breast cancer and a comparison group of 75 patients with unilateral breast cancer, pairwise matched by age and family history, for mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Five frameshift deletions (517delGT in BRCA1; 4772delA, 5946delCT, 6174delT and 8138del5 in BRCA2) were identified in patients with bilateral disease. No further mutations, apart from polymorphisms and 3 rare unclassified variants, were found after scanning the whole BRCA1 and BRCA2 coding sequence. Three pathogenic BRCA1 mutations (Cys61Gly, 3814del5, 5382insC) were identified in the group of patients with unilateral breast cancer. The frequencies of common BRCA1 and BRCA2 missense variants were not different between the 2 groups. In summary, we did not find a significantly increased prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a hospital-based cohort of German patients with bilateral breast cancer. We conclude that bilaterality of breast cancer on its own is not strongly associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations when adjusted for age and family history. The high frequency of bilateral disease in multi-case breast cancer families may be due to a familial aggregation of additional susceptibility factors modifying the penetrance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.     

Prevention of breast cancer in women who carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations: a critical review of the literature

The purpose of our study was to review the evidence for the efficacy of surveillance for early detection, bilateral prophylactic mastectomy, prophylactic oophorectomy and chemoprevention in preventing breast cancer and improving survival of BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers. A critical review of journal articles published between 1998 and 2004 identified by searches of MEDLINE, PubMed and references of retrieved articles was undertaken. None of the current evidence is based on randomized studies. The efficacy of surveillance for early detection of breast cancer among BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers is not yet established. Screening with clinical breast examination and mammography showed lower sensitivity in BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers than in the general population. Screening with MRI might offer higher sensitivity rates than mammography. Prophylactic mastectomy was shown to significantly reduce the risk of breast cancer by 89.5-100%. However, of all strategies reviewed, mastectomy was the least acceptable to women at high risk. Tamoxifen use was associated with breast cancer prevention among BRCA2 carriers (RR=0.38, 95%CI: 0.06-1.56). In BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers with breast cancer, tamoxifen use was associated with the prevention of secondary breast cancer (OR= 0.50, 95% CI: 0.28-0.89). Prophylactic oophorectomy was associated with hazard ratios for breast cancer of 0.47 (95%CI:0.29-0.77) and 0.32 (95%CI: 0.08-1.20), in retrospective and short follow-up prospective cohort studies, respectively. There is a pressing need for more studies in order to determine which of the 4 strategies alone, or in combination, is the most effective for the prevention of breast cancer and for the improvement of survival of BRCA mutation carriers.     

Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Pakistani breast and ovarian cancer patients

Among Asian countries, Pakistan has the highest rates of breast and ovarian cancer. To assess the contribution of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ line mutations to these high rates, we conducted the first study of 176 Pakistani breast and ovarian cancer patients, selected on family history and on age of diagnosis. Comprehensive BRCA mutation screening was performed using a range of techniques, including denaturing high-pressure liquid chromatography, single strand conformational polymorphism analysis and protein truncation test, followed by DNA sequencing. Thirty deleterious germ-line mutations were identified in the 176 families (17.0%), including 23 in BRCA1 and 7 in BRCA2. Four mutations, 185delAG, 185insA, S1503X and R1835X, were recurrent; these accounted for 52% of all identified BRCA1 mutations. Haplotype analyses suggested founder effects for 3 of these. The prevalence of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations was 42.8% for families with multiple cases of breast cancer, and was 50.0% for the breast/ovarian cancer families. The prevalence of mutations was 11.9% for single cases of early-onset breast cancer (< or =30 years) and was 9.0% for single cases of early-onset ovarian cancer (< or =45 years). Our findings show that BRCA mutations account for a substantial proportion of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer and early-onset breast and ovarian cancer cases in Pakistan.     

Evaluation of Genetic Variations in miRNA-Binding Sites of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes as Risk Factors for the Development of Early-Onset and/or Familial Breast Cancer

Although genetic markers identifying women at an increased risk of developing breast cancer exist, themajority of inherited risk factors remain elusive. Mutations in the BRCA1/BRCA2 gene confer a substantialincrease in breast cancer risk, yet routine clinical genetic screening is limited to the coding regions and intronexonboundaries, precluding the identification of mutations in noncoding and untranslated regions. Because 3’untranslated region (3’UTR) polymorphisms disrupting microRNA (miRNA) binding can be functional and canact as genetic markers of cancer risk, we aimed to determine genetic variation in the 3’UTR of BRCA1/BRCA2in familial and early-onset breast cancer patients with and without mutations in the coding regions of BRCA1/BRCA2 and to identify specific 3’UTR variants that may be risk factors for cancer development. The 3’UTRs ofthe BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were screened by heteroduplex analysis and DNA sequencing in 100 patients from46 BRCA1/2 families, 54 non-BRCA1/2 families, and 47 geographically matched controls. Two polymorphismswere identified. SNPs c.*1287C>T (rs12516) (BRCA1) and c.*105A>C (rs15869) (BRCA2) were identified in27% and 24% of patients, respectively. These 2 variants were also identified in controls with no family historyof cancer (23.4% and 23.4%, respectively). In comparison to variations in the 3’UTR region of the BRCA1/2genes and the BRCA1/2 mutational status in patients, there was a statistically significant relationship betweenthe BRCA1 gene polymorphism c.*1287C>T (rs12516) and BRCA1 mutations (p=0.035) by Fisher’s Exact Test.SNP c.*1287C>T (rs12516) of the BRCA1 gene may have potential use as a genetic marker of an increased risk ofdeveloping breast cancer and likely represents a non-coding sequence variation in BRCA1 that impacts BRCA1function and leads to increased early-onset and/or familial breast cancer risk in the Turkish population.     

Risk of cancer at sites other than the breast in Swedish families eligible for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation testing.

BACKGROUND: Population-based data on the risk of cancer in families eligible for BRCA1/2 mutation testing may help to reach a consensus about the association of BRCA1/2 mutations with cancer at sites other than the breast and may reveal new, non-BRCA1/2 related components of the familial clustering of cancer in those families. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The families of the Swedish Family-Cancer Database with at least three generations (n = 944,723) were classified according to the criteria proposed by the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. The cancer incidences in the classified families were compared with the incidences in the general population. The percentages of individuals with cancer in families eligible for BRCA1/2 mutation testing were compared with data in the literature to estimate the proportion of malignancies related to BRCA1/2 mutations. RESULTS: Families with two breast cancers before the age of 50 years showed increased risk of early onset pancreatic, prostate and ovarian cancers; families with ovarian and breast cancers presented increased incidences for ovarian and ocular cancers; families with two breast cancers, at least one of them under the age of 50 years, showed increased risks of prostate and primary liver cancers. Stomach cancer before age 70 years was twice as frequent in families with breast and ovarian cancers as in the general population. BRCA1/2 mutations probably explain most of the aggregation of ovarian cancer in families with male breast cancer, and in families with at least two breast cancers diagnosed before age 50 years. CONCLUSIONS: The association of BRCA1/2 mutations with ovarian, pancreatic, prostate and stomach cancers was confirmed at a population level. However, the clustering of early pancreatic cancer in families with two breast cancers under age 50 years, the aggregation of ovarian cancer in families with breast and ovarian cancers, and the increased incidence of early onset prostate cancer in families with male breast cancer seem to be due to other effects unrelated to BRCA1/2 mutations.     

Collaboration of breast cancer clinic and genetic counseling division for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation family in Japan

BACKGROUND: BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations cause high breast cancer incidence rates as high as 80% Although prophylactic therapy is still controversial, several prophylactic therapies have been proposed and tried for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Prophylactic surgery, chemo-prevention and precise screening have been proposed as prophylactic therapy. All BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers need knowledge about their disease and the countermeasures that are used to protect against onset of disease. Counseling plays an important role in this regard for people with genetic diseases. Therefore, collaboration between breast cancer clinics and genetic counseling services is the most important issue in clinical practice. Our group consists of three national universities and a general hospital. In this article we describe our trial to construct a clinical system against hereditary breast cancer as an interim report for the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty familial breast cancer patients were registered in this study. The whole sequence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 were analyzed. If pathological mutations were detected, their first degree families were introduced to the counseling division at each institute when candidates visited counseling divisions. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Four cases of a deleterious mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 were detected among 20 cases. Their first degree relatives are now under consideration for visiting counseling divisions. The clinical system described in this study should play a role to protect BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers in Japan.     

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among breast cancer patients from the Philippines

Age-adjusted incidence rates of breast cancer vary more than 10-fold worldwide, with the highest rates reported in North America and Europe. The highest breast cancer incidence rates in Southeast Asia have been reported for the Manila Cancer Registry in the Philippines, with an age-standardized rate of 47.7 per 100,000 per year. The possible contribution of hereditary factors to these elevated rates has not been investigated. We conducted a case-control study of 294 unselected incident breast cancer cases and 346 female controls from Manila, Philippines. Cases and controls were selected from women below the age of 65 undergoing evaluation at the PGH in Manila because of a suspicious breast mass. Molecular analysis identified 12 BRCA2 mutations and 3 BRCA1 mutations. We estimate the prevalence of BRCA mutations among unselected breast cancer cases in the Philippines to be 5.1% (95% CI: 2.6-7.6%), with a prevalence of 4.1% (95% CI: 1.8-6.4%) for BRCA2 mutations alone. The BRCA2 4265delCT and 4859delA mutations were found in 2 and 4 unrelated cases, respectively; haplotype analysis confirmed that these, and the BRCA1 5454delC mutation, are founder mutations. BRCA2 mutations were also found in 2 of 346 controls (0.6%; 95% CI: 0.2-1.4%). Compared with non-carrier cases, the cumulative risk of breast cancer for first-degree relatives of mutation carriers was 24.3% to age 50, compared with <4% for first-degree relatives of non-carrier cases (RR = 6.6; 95% CI: 2.6-17.2; p= 7.5 x 10(-6)). Our data suggest that penetrance of BRCA mutations is not reduced in the Philippines. Germline mutations in the BRCA2 gene contribute more than mutations BRCA1 to breast cancer in the Philippines, due in large part to the presence of 2 common founder mutations.     

BRCA1 andBRCA2 germline mutations in Japanese with hereditary breast cancer families

We examined germline mutations inBRCA1 andBRCA2 in 23 Japanese breast cancer families, using PCR-SSCP analysis. The same nonsense mutation (exon 5, Leu63ter) ofBRCA1 was detected in two different families. Three different mutations resulting in a truncatedBRCA2 protein (exon 9, 20, 24) were detected in three different families, including one male case of breast cancer. One base substitution mutation inBRCA2, A10462G, was detected in the other two families. Although the mean age of onset for breast cancer in families with theBRCA1- mutation was 50 years, the age of onset in families with theBRCA2-mutation was from 28 to 43 years. Among the 23 families examined, two families had members with ovarian cancers, three had members with prostate cancers, and one had a pancreatic cancer. However, none of these families was positive for theBRCA1 orBRCA2 mutation. Histopathologically, we observed a prevalence of histological grade 3 inBRCA2-associated familial breast cancers, because of nuclear atypia, structural atypia and mitotic activity. It is suggested thatBRCA2 may play a more important role thanBRCA1 in Japanese familial breast cancers, and these mutations are related to the aggressive nature and highly proliferative activity of the tumors.     

Prognostic value of BRCA1 mutations in familial breast cancer patients affected by a second primary cancer

The aim of this prospective study is to assess the prognostic value of BRCA1 mutations in familial breast cancer patients affected by a second primary cancer. The study group comprised 19 women having multiple primary breast cancers (breast-breast, breast-other primary) who were either BRCA1 mutation carriers, or not. Appearance of a second primary cancer was recognised as the event and survival and second primary free cancer survival was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the secondary primary cancer. The results of this study show that the event free survival of women with familial breast cancer affected by a second primary cancer, who are BRCA1 mutation carriers is better, compared with women from the general population with breast cancer selected for second primary cancer sites and all second primary sites—P = 0.009 and P = 0.0078 respectively. In contrast, the event free survival of women with breast cancer affected by a second primary cancer, without a breast cancer family history, who are not BRCA1 mutation carriers is the same, as for women from the general population with breast cancer selected for second primary cancer sites and all second primary sites—P = 0.6417 and P = 0.4859 respectively. The median time from diagnosis of the first to second primary cancer in the mutation carrying, and non-carrying, groups was 8,7 and 1,9 years respectively. In the study group, the highest event free survival rates had been observed among those carrying the said mutations—66.7% at 5 years, and 33.3% at 10 years—in contrast with those not carrying the mutations, with rates of 30.8% and 15.4% respectively.     

The CHEK2*1100delC variant acts as a breast cancer risk modifier in non-BRCA1/BRCA2 multiple-case families

The frame-shifting mutation 1100delC in the cell-cycle-checkpoint kinase 2 gene (CHEK2) has been reported to be associated with familial breast cancer in families in which mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were excluded. To investigate the role of this variant as a candidate breast cancer susceptibility allele, we determined its prevalence in 237 breast cancer patients and 331 healthy relatives derived from 71 non-BRCA1/BRCA2 multiple-case early onset breast cancer families. Twenty-seven patients (11.4%) were carrying the CHEK2*1100delC variant. At least one carrier was found in 15 of the 71 families (21.1%). There was no evidence of cosegregation between the variant and breast cancer, but carrier patients developed breast cancer earlier than did noncarriers. We studied CHEK2 protein expression in 111, and loss of heterozygosity at CHEK2 in 88 breast tumors from these patients. Twelve of 15 tumors from carriers showed absent protein expression as opposed to 3 of 76 tumors from noncarriers (P < 0.001). CHEK2 loss of heterozygosity was associated with absence of protein expression but not with 1100delC carrier status. Thus, selecting for breast cancer cases with a strong familial background not accounted for by BRCA1 or BRCA2 strongly enriches for carriers of CHEK2*1100delC. Our results support a model in which CHEK2*1100delC interacts with an as yet unknown gene (or genes) to increase breast cancer risk.     

Novel germline mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1, BRCA2 and p53 gene in breast cancer patients from India

Mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for more than 80% of hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. p53 tumor suppressor gene that controls cellular growth and differentiation is also known to be mutated in more than 50% of human cancers including breast cancer. We have carried out a study on BRCA1 and BRCA2 along with p53 gene mutations in both sporadic as well as familial breast cancer patients from India where breast cancer is fast emerging as a major cancer among premenopausal urban women. We examined 124 untreated primary breast cancer patients comprising 100 sporadic and 24 familial cases including 56 age-matched healthy controls for the presence of BRCA1, BRCA2 and the p53 gene mutations using PCR-SSCP and direct nucleotide sequencing. Certain frequently mutated exons such as 2, 5, 11, 13 and 20 of BRCA1, exons 2, 9, 11 (for 6174delT), 18 and 20 of BRCA2 and 4–9 exons of p53 gene were analyzed in sporadic breast cancer while all 22 coding exons of BRCA1 including its flanking intronic regions along with above mentioned exons of BRCA2 and p53 gene were analyzed in familial breast cancer patients. We identified six patients (25%) with BRCA1 mutation of which three were found to be of novel type one in exon 16 (4956insG) and two in exon 7 (Lys110Thr) (Ser114Pro) out of 24 familial breast cancer patients studied from two different geographic regions/populations of India. Two sisters from a single family (12.5%) out of eight families from Goa with Portuguese colonial origin showed presence of founder Ashkenazi Jewish BRCA1 mutation (185delAG) along with (IVS7 561–34T>C; IVS18 527166G>A). While from New Delhi, four (25%) of 16 breast cancer families showed BRCA1 mutations; a frame shift protein truncating (4956insG), a transition nonsense (Gln1395Stop) and two amino acid substitutions (Lys110Thr) and (Ser114Pro). Only one (4%) p53 mutation (Val97Ile) in its exon 4 along with BRCA1 mutation (4956insG) could be detected. No major sequence variation in BRCA2 gene was observed except for G203A at 5 UTR of exon 2, a common population polymorphism in two Goan patients who also showed silent nucleotide change for amino acid serine at codon 1436 of BRCA1 gene. None of the 100 sporadic breast cancer patients revealed any protein truncating or deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation. Interestingly, three (3%) p53 mutations in its exon 5 were detected in sporadic breast cancer patients. Although three novel BRCA1 mutations including a founder Ashkenazi Jewish BRCA1 mutation were recorded in Indian women with familial breast cancer, the overall prevalence of BRCA gene mutations in Indian women with a family history of breast cancer appears to be low.     

Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast cancer patients from Cuba

The contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 to breast cancer incidence in Cuba has not yet been explored. In order to estimate the proportion of breast cancers due to BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Cuba, and to identify possible Cuban founder mutations, we conducted a study of unselected breast cancer patients from Havana, Cuba. We enrolled 336 women with breast cancer from a large public hospital in the city. A family history of cancer was obtained from each patient and a blood sample was processed for DNA analysis. Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were sought using a combination of techniques, but all mutations were confirmed by direct sequencing. We were able to successfully complete testing on samples from 307 women. Among these, eight mutations were identified (seven in BRCA2 and one in BRCA1) representing 2.6% of the total, including 10% of familial cases and 10% of cases under age forty. One BRCA2 mutation (c.3394C > T) was found in two women, but no clear example of a founder mutation was identified. In summary, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are not uncommon in Cuban women with breast cancer, but the absence of founder mutations precludes the development of a rapid and inexpensive clinical screening test.     

Familial breast cancers without mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 have low cyclin E and high cyclin D1 in contrast to cancers in BRCA mutation carriers.

PURPOSE: We analyzed the expression of critical cell cycle regulators cyclin E and cyclin D1 in familial breast cancer, focusing on BRCA mutation-negative tumors. Cyclin E expression in tumors of BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers is higher, and cyclin D1 expression lower, than in sporadic tumors. In familial non-BRCA1/2 tumors, cyclin E and cyclin D1 expression has not been studied. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Cyclin E and cyclin D1 immunohistochemical expression was studied in tissue microarrays consisting of 53 BRCA1, 58 BRCA2, 798 familial non-BRCA1/2, and 439 sporadic breast tumors. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, BRCA1 tumors had significantly more frequently high cyclin E (88%) and low cyclin D1 (84%) expression than sporadic (54% and 49%, respectively) or familial non-BRCA1/2 (38% and 45%, respectively) tumors. BRCA2 tumors had significantly more frequently low cyclin D1 expression (68%) than sporadic or familial non-BRCA1/2 tumors and significantly more frequently high cyclin E expression than familial non-BRCA1/2 tumors. In a logistic regression model, cyclin expression, early age of onset, and estrogen receptor (ER) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status were the independent factors most clearly distinguishing tumors of BRCA1 mutation carriers from other familial breast cancers. High cyclin E and low cyclin D1 expression were also independent predictors of BRCA2 mutation when compared with familial non-BRCA1/2 tumors. Most interestingly, lower frequency of high cyclin E expression independently distinguished familial non-BRCA1/2 tumors also from sporadic ones. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclin E and cyclin D1 expression distinguishes non-BRCA1/2 tumors from both sporadic and BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated tumors and may reflect different predisposition and pathogenesis in these groups.     

The variant E233G of the RAD51D gene could be a low-penetrance allele in high-risk breast cancer families without BRCA1/2 mutations

Six SNPs have been detected in the DNA repair genes RAD51C and RAD51D, not previously characterized. The novel variant E233G in RAD51D is more highly represented in high-risk, site-specific, familial breast cancer cases that are not associated with the BRCA1/2 genes, with a frequency of 5.74% (n = 174) compared to a control population (n = 567) and another subset of breast cancer patients (n = 765) with a prevalence of around 2% only (comparison to controls, OR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.12-6.03; p < 0.021). We found that the immunohistochemical profile detected in available tumors from these patients differs slightly from those described in non-BRCA1/2 tumors. Finally, the structural prediction of the putative functional consequence of this change indicates that it can diminish protein stability and structure. This suggests a role for E233G as a low-penetrance susceptibility gene in the specific subgroup of high-risk familial breast cancer cases that are not related to BRCA1/2.