Nitric oxide signaling modulates synaptic transmission during early postnatal development

Early γ-aminobutyric acid mediated (GABAergic) synaptic transmission and correlated neuronal activity are fundamental to network formation; however, their regulation during early postnatal development is poorly understood. Nitric oxide (NO) is an important retrograde messenger at glutamatergic synapses, and it was recently shown to play an important role also at GABAergic synapses in the adult brain. The subcellular localization and network effect of this signaling pathway during early development are so far unexplored, but its disruption at this early age is known to lead to profound morphological and functional alterations. Here, we provide functional evidence--using whole-cell recording--that NO signaling modulates not only glutamatergic but also GABAergic synaptic transmission in the mouse hippocampus during the early postnatal period. We identified the precise subcellular localization of key elements of the underlying molecular cascade using immunohistochemistry at the light--and electron microscopic levels. As predicted by these morpho-functional data, multineuron calcium imaging in acute slices revealed that this NO-signaling machinery is involved also in the control of synchronous network activity patterns. We suggest that the retrograde NO-signaling system is ideally suited to fulfill a general presynaptic regulatory role and may effectively fine-tune network activity during early postnatal development, while GABAergic transmission is still depolarizing.     

Nitric oxide alters chondrocyte function by disrupting cytoskeletal signaling complexes.

Components of osteoarthritis include increases in pericellular fibronectin and in chondrocyte beta1 integrin expression. Events which follow ligation of fibronectin to its chondrocyte-receptor, the integrin alpha5beta1 include an assembly of a subplasmalemmal actin/rho A/focal adhesion kinase signaling complex. In addition, nitric oxide (NO), a potential mediator of cartilage pathophysiology disrupts the cytoskeletal signaling complex associated with integrin signaling. In these studies, we examined the relationship among integrin signaling, biosynthesis of S-35 sulfate containing proteoglycans and release of YKL-40 (a secretory glycoprotein) by comparing cell responses using cells plated on a fibronectin-coated or polyHEME coated surfaces. We report that the release of proteoglycan and glycoprotein require anchorage dependent signals by integrin costimulation. NO which disrupts the integrin signaling complex attenuates both cell responses. Taken together NO may serve as a nonspecific 'brake' to prevent anabolic and catabolic injury responses.     

Nitric oxide in wound-healing

Modulation of the complex process of wound-healing remains a surgical challenge. Little improvement beyond controlling infection, gentle tissue handling, and debridement of necrotic tissue has been had in the modern era. However, increasing appreciation of the process from a biomolecular perspective offers the potential for making significant strides in wound modulation. The bioactive molecule nitric oxide was found to have wide-ranging impact on cellular activities, including the cellular responses engendered by wound healing. Current research suggests that nitric oxide and several nitric oxide donors can exert biologic effects, although the particular net responses of cells contributing to wound repair are context-dependent.     

Nitric oxide in shock

Refractory hypotension with end-organ hypoperfusion and failure is an ominous feature of shock. Distributive shock is caused by severe infections (septic shock) or severe systemic allergic reactions (anaphylactic shock). In 1986, it was concluded that nitric oxide (NO) is the endothelium-derived relaxing factor that had been discovered 6 years earlier. Since then, NO has been shown to be important for the physiological and pathological control of vascular tone. Nevertheless, although inhibition of NO synthesis restores blood pressure, NO synthase (NOS) inhibition cannot improve outcome, on the contrary. This implies that NO acts as a double-edged sword during septic shock. Consequently, the focus has shifted towards selective inducible NOS (iNOS) inhibitors. The contribution of NO to anaphylactic shock seems to be more straightforward, as NOS inhibition abrogates shock in conscious mice. Surprisingly, however, this shock-inducing NO is not produced by the inducible iNOS, but by the so-called constitutive enzyme endothelial NOS. This review summarizes the contribution of NO to septic and anaphylactic shock. Although NOS inhibition may be promising for the treatment of anaphylactic shock, the failure of a phase III trial indicates that other approaches are required for the successful treatment of septic shock. Amongst these, high hopes are set for selective iNOS inhibitors. But it might also be necessary to shift gears and focus on downstream cardiovascular targets of NO or on other vasodilating phenomena.     

Nitric oxide in osteoarthritis.

Activated articular chondrocytes produce large amounts of nitric oxide (NO), and there is increasing evidence that this is involved in the etiopathogenesis of osteoarthritis (OA). Because of its short half-life, the biological effects of endogenously produced NO are likely to occur locally within the cartilage. We have observed that inhibitors of NO synthases relieve the inhibition of matrix synthesis that otherwise occurs in response to IL-1. To avoid the use of inhibitors, we have recently transduced chondrocytes with the iNOS (NOS-2) gene and confirmed the ability of the endogenously produced NO to inhibit matrix synthesis. Despite the high levels of NO made by these cells, there was no evidence of apoptosis or other forms of cell death. NO was also shown to inhibit the production of TGF-beta(1)by cells treated with IL-1, as well as to decrease matrix production in response to IGF-1. The hypothesis that NO inhibits matrix production by interfering with important autocrine and paracrine factors should be entertained.     

Nitric oxide in thoracic surgery

Inhalation of nitric oxide has been reported to alter pulmonary blood flow in animal and human studies. This effect is related to the relaxant action of nitric oxide on arterial vascular smooth muscle cells. When nitric oxide is administered by inhalation, this effect is limited to the pulmonary vasculature as it is rapidly inactivated by hemoglobin as soon as it enters the blood stream. The effect of inhaled nitric oxide is more pronounced in well ventilated areas of the lung, where it promotes redistribution of pulmonary blood flow to regions with high ventilation-perfusion ratio decreasing pulmonary hypertension and improving oxygenation. Nitric oxide has been used to treat pulmonary hypertension and hypoxemia that occurred in thoracic surgery during one lung ventilation, postpneumonectomy pulmonary edema and lung transplantation. Inhaled nitric oxide may be a useful tool in patients with a low PaO2/FiO2 ratio during one lung ventilation. Further powered studies are still required to define the dose and timing of inhaled nitric oxide in patients who do have ischemia-reperfusion injury after lung transplantation.     

Nitric oxide in rheumatology.

Nitric oxide (NO) is attracting considerable interest because it mediates many functions. This gas is ubiquitously produced in the body by three enzymes, called NO synthases. Two NO synthases are constitutively expressed, one in the nervous system and the other in the blood vessels, where it regulates tissue perfusion. The third NO synthase can be induced by several stimuli (bacterial endotoxins, cytokines), most notably in inflammatory cells and chondrocytes. The effects of NO produced by the inducible NO synthase range from T-cell response modulation to formation of free radicals responsible fortissue damage and cartilage matrix degradation. Administration of NO synthase inhibitors in animal models of arthritis yields ambiguous effects, often with prevention of arthritis, but sometimes with worsening of established arthritis. The data available to date do not support the use of such inhibitors in the treatment of human arthritis.     

Nitric oxide and glomerulonephritis

Glomerulonephritis is a common clinical condition that is caused by immune-mediated injury to the kidney and is characterized by dysfunction of the glomerular capillary filtration barrier. Nitric oxide (NO), a ubiquitous molecule with many biological functions throughout the body, has been evaluated as an inflammatory mediator in these circumstances. NO may induce glomerular injury directly or may act via stimulation of a host of other inflammatory mediators. A variety of experimental models of glomerulonephritis have been studied including those induced by infusion of antibodies to the Thy1.1 antigen or glomerular basement membrane, Heymann nephritis, and autoimmune nephritis. In virtually all of these cases there is evidence of increased NO production. Excessive production of NO by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), derived from infiltrating immune cells or resident glomerular cells, nearly always is associated with increased glomerular injury. Interventions that inhibit this enzyme result in less proteinuria and diminished glomerular damage. In contrast, NO derived from endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) may limit glomerular disease by preserving endothelial cell integrity. There are only a limited number of studies that have evaluated the impact of NO in patients with glomerulonephritis. Although the bulk of evidence supports a role of NO as a pro-inflammatory mediator in glomerulonephritis, additional work is needed to show an association between altered NO production and the severity and outcome of disease in patients with this disease. It is hoped that better understanding of the role of NO in glomerulonephritis will lead to the development of therapies to ameliorate the disease.     

Nitric oxide and glomerulonephritis

The normal glomerulus expresses constitutive nitric oxide (NO) synthesis. Increased NO from inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) occurs in acute immune glomerulonephritis (GN), in which rapid induction probably depends on local cytokines and/or oxygen radical production. Although intrinsic glomerular cells possess iNOS, in acute GN, a leukocyte origin for iNOS activity is most evident. Although NO potentially could be toxic or protective, there is as yet no clear understanding of how it affects the pathogenesis of GN. This may depend on the amount present, which in turn depends on NOS gene regulation, simultaneous production of other radicals, and the activity of arginase. High-output NO has been implicated in injury in only one model of GN, and no effect of iNOS knockout found in another. The concept is emerging that constitutive NO is critical for offsetting increased vasoconstriction in the injured glomerulus.     

Nitric oxide and hemodialysis

Nitric oxide (NO), previously thought of as a noxious gas, is now recognized as an important mediator of vascular responsiveness. Soon after its discovery, it was realized that the actions of NO are similar to the previously described endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF). It is synthesized in the vascular endothelium utilizing the enzyme nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and diffuses in the adjacent vascular media, where it has a vasodilatory action. Opposing actions of NO and vasoconstrictor agents (such as endothelin-1, angiotensin IotaIota, and others) maintain the vascular tone of the renal arteries. The same balance at the level of the macula densa maintains glomerular filtration rate (GFR) during varying levels of salt excretion. Lack of NO can result in disruption of this fine balance, with resultant vasoconstriction and disease progression, hypertension, and accelerated atherosclerosis. In addition, hypertension may result from positive salt balance that occurs when macula densa NOS is inhibited. While most investigators report low levels of NO in uremic subjects, the levels in hemodialysis (HD) patients have not been characterized adequately. This is primarily because HD patients are exposed to both stimulatory and inhibitory factors for NO synthesis. Retention of inhibitors of NOS tends to decrease NO levels, whereas production of NO will be increased by cytokines generated during blood-dialyzer interaction. There is less disagreement, however, over the finding of elevated levels in those with dialyzer reactions and dialysis-induced hypotension. Recent developments in the isolation of inducible and constitutive forms of NOS makes understanding of its pathophysiologic effects more complete. Newer treatment directed at inhibiting only the inducible forms of NOS (sparing the constitutive forms) may soon be found useful for the treatment and prevention of hypotension and dialyzer reactions in HD patients.