Triceps-sparing versus olecranon osteotomy for ORIF: analysis of 67 cases of intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus

The purpose of this study was to compare the triceps-sparing approach with olecranon osteotomy regarding their effects on the functional outcomes of intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus managed with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), by reviewing 67 cases of intercondylar distal humerus fractures surgically managed with either of the approaches during 2001-2009. The medical records and radiographs of 30 male and 37 female patients, with a mean age of 44.5 years (range, 16-77) and a mean follow-up time of 34.3 months (range, 6-89), were retrospectively reviewed. Flexion, extension, arc of flexion/extension, pronation, supination, arc of pronation/supination and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) were used to assess the functional outcomes of intercondylar distal humerus fractures treated with ORIF through the triceps-sparing approach or olecranon osteotomy. According to the AO Foundation (AO) classification, there were 10 cases of C1, 28 cases of C2 and 29 cases of C3 fractures. At the time of review, all fractures had united. Although there was no overall statistically significant difference in the average flexion, extension, arc of flexion/extension, pronation, supination and arc of pronation/supination between the triceps-sparing group (n = 34) and the olecranon osteotomy group (n = 33), patients above 60 years of age tended to have more extension loss (mean 22.9°, range 0-55°) after ORIF via the triceps-sparing approach, compared with any other surgical approach/age combination group. In the triceps-sparing group, although only 37.5% of patients over the age of 60 years obtained excellent/good MEPS, the rate increased to 100% in patients aged less than 40 years of age (P < 0.05). By contrast, the rate of excellent/good MEPS remained above 80% in all age groups of patients treated with ORIF via olecranon osteotomy. In conclusion, ORIF via the triceps-sparing approach confers inferior functional outcomes for intercondylar distal humerus fractures in patients over the age of 60 years, for whom the olecranon osteotomy approach may be a better choice. However, for patients less than 60 years of age, especially those less than 40 years of age, either approach confers satisfactory outcomes.     

The olecranon osteotomy provides better outcome than the triceps-lifting approach for the treatment of distal humerus fractures

Introduction

Intra-articular distal humeral fractures can be approached in a variety of ways. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the functional outcomes of two approaches: approach with olecranon osteotomy and triceps-lifting approach for the treatment of intra-articular distal humeral fractures.

Methods

This study shows a consecutive series of 54 intra-articular distal humeral fractures of 54 patients who were treated with open reduction and internal fixation with anatomic plating. Lateral plating was performed in 10 (45.5 %) patients, and medial and lateral parallel plating was performed in 12 (54.5 %) patients in olecranon osteotomy group, while lateral plating was performed in 8 (25 %) patients, and medial and lateral parallel plating was performed in 24 (75 %) patients in triceps-lifting group.

Results

Mean follow-up was 38.3 months for olecranon osteotomy group and 41.4 months for triceps-lifting group. Functional outcomes according to MAYO elbow score and extension-flexion motion arc values were significantly better in olecranon osteotomy group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Approach with olecranon osteotomy provided better functional outcomes than triceps-lifting approach. Additionally, intra-articular distal humerus fractures can be safely treated with olecranon osteotomy which provides more control over the elbow joint and better visualisation and allows early postoperative rehabilitation.

Level of evidence

IV.     

Factors affecting the functional outcome of open reduction and internal fixation on intercondylar distal humeral fractures in elderly patients

In the present retrospective study, we explored factors affecting the functional outcome of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) on intercondylar distal humeral fractures in patients over age 60. The medical records, radiographs, and radial T-scores of 68 consecutive elderly patients (aged between 60 and 86?years) with intercondylar (AO type C) distal humeral fractures treated with ORIF during March 2001–June 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was used to assess the functional outcome after ORIF. Our results showed that the rate of excellent/good MEPS in patients who received ORIF through olecranon osteotomy (65.0%) was significantly higher than that in patients who received ORIF through the triceps-sparing approach (35.0%) (P?<?0.05). Among patients with an excellent/good MEPS, the mean radial T-score in the olecranon osteotomy group was significantly lower than that in the triceps-sparing group (P?<?0.05). Both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that patients with ≤12?days of immobilization tend to get an excellent/good MEPS. In conclusion, in patients over age 60, bone mineral density (BMD) represented by the radial T-score is a primary factor influencing the functional outcome of ORIF on intercondylar distal humeral fractures. Compared to the triceps-sparing approach, olecranon osteotomy can result in excellent/good functional outcome within a broader range of BMD, which may account for the significantly higher rate of excellent/good MEPS rating in elderly patients treated with olecranon osteotomy. In addition, early mobilization is recommended for elderly patients treated with ORIF for intercondylar distal humeral fractures.     

Coronal plane fractures of the distal humerus involving the capitellum and trochlea treated with open reduction internal fixation

Introduction

Coronal plane fractures of the distal humerus involving the capitellum and trochlea are rare. Treatments have evolved from closed reduction to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) to achieve a stable joint that allows early mobilization.

Background

We determined the functional outcomes of treating coronal plane fractures of the distal humerus with ORIF.

Methods

We reviewed the records of all patients with coronal plane fractures of the distal humerus treated by ORIF. Fractures were classified according to Bryan and Morrey. Cannulated screws were used for fixation. All patients were evaluated using the Mayo Elbow Score Performance Index (MEPI) and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) scores at least 1 year later.

Results

Of the 18 patients evaluated (12 women), the mean (SD) age was 45.3(16.5) years (range 16–70). There were seven Type-I, five Type-III, and six Type-IV fractures. Mean follow-up was 43.6 (38.1) months (range 12–120). The mean elbow range of motion in sagittal plane at last follow-up ranged from 8.9° to 132.8°. The mean MEPI score was 86.7 (15.2) points (range 60–100), corresponding to 12 excellent, 2 good, and 4 fair outcomes. The mean DASH score was 15.3 (13.5) points (range 17–35.8). Heterotrophic ossification developed in one patient with delayed fixation; 14 patients with excellent or good results returned to their previous activity levels. Functional scores did not differ by age, sex, or fracture types (P > 0.05 for all comparisons).

Conclusion

ORIF with cannulated screws, which maintain a stable anatomic articular position, provides satisfactory results in coronal plane fractures of the distal humerus.

Level of evidence

Level IV case series.     

Fixing simple olecranon fractures with the Olecranon Osteotomy Nail (OleON)

Objective

Stable fixation of simple olecranon fractures or olecranon osteotomies in order to allow early functional treatment.

Indications

Simple (non-comminuted) olecranon fractures and (Chevron) osteotomies of the olecranon.

Contraindications

Comminuted fractures and fractures more than 40?mm distal than the tip of the olecranon are contraindications.

Surgical technique

Using a slightly curved posterior approach, the fracture is anatomically reduced. The fracture is temporary stabilized using K-wires. A guiding K-wire is positioned centrally in the medullary canal in the lateral projection. The medullary canal is reamed over the K-wire. The distal part of the nail is inserted and locked. The proximal part is inserted and screwed onto the distal part to compress the fracture. For osteotomies, the distal part is inserted and locked (using the same technique as described before) prior to performing the osteotomy. At the end of the surgery, the osteotomy is reduced, the proximal part is inserted, and the osteotomy is compressed.

Postoperative management

As the stability of this compressive osteosynthesis is very high, early post-operative mobilization is allowed. No immobilization is used. Depending on the soft tissue situation, active range of motion and passive stretching is initiated immediately postoperatively.

Results

Using this technique in 21?patients (mean age 42?years) with acute fractures or osteotomies, sound fracture healing was achieved in 19 of 21?patients. The active range of motion was 130.2° flexion, 10.6° extension deficit, and a normal pro-supination arch. In one patient, delayed union caused implant failure. In this patient, a surgical error jeopardized stability. In a second patient, a peri-implant fracture after adequate trauma made a change in therapy necessary.     

Distal-third diaphyseal fractures of the humerus: choice of approach and surgical treatment

Purpose

Distal-third diaphyseal fractures of the humerus are often hard to treat due to location and pattern of the fractures, radial nerve injury, and quality of bone and age of patients. The aim of this retrospective study is to propose the best approach and the best surgical technique according to the pattern of extra-articular fracture of the distal humerus.

Methods

We have treated 37 fractures of the distal humerus between January 2010 and July 2015 classified according to the AO classification. There were 2 open fractures. We treated all fractures with open reduction and internal fixation with plates and screws. In 20 cases, we performed a posterior midline triceps-splitting approach, with patients in prone decubitus position; in 2 cases, the triceps-splitting approach with the patients in supine decubitus position; in 3 cases, the olecranon osteotomy approach in prone decubitus position; and in 12 cases, the lateral approach in supine decubitus position.

Results

Thirty cases had a medium follow-up of 6 months. We observe 2 post-operative radial nerve palsies healed in 5 months and 2 cases of non-union. The average time to union of remaining cases was 16 weeks (range 12–24). Elbow motility was complete in 25 cases, in 4 cases there was an extension loss of 5°, and in one case there was an extension loss of 10°.

Conclusions

The use of plates allows an anatomical fracture reduction, a better control of alignment of humerus and, with a rigid fixation, an early elbow mobilization. The best approach and the best surgical technique depend on the pattern of the fracture of distal humerus.

     

Olecranon fractures: factors influencing re-operation

Purpose

We evaluated factors influencing re-operation in tension band and plating of isolated olecranon fractures.

Methods

Four hundred eighty-nine patients with isolated olecranon fractures who underwent tension band (TB) or open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) from 2003 to 2013 were identified at an urban level 1 trauma centre. Medical records were reviewed for patient information and complications, including infection, nonunion, malunion, loss of function or hardware complication requiring an unplanned surgical intervention. Electronic radiographs of these patients were reviewed to identify Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) fracture classification and patients who underwent TB or ORIF.

Results

One hundred seventy-seven patients met inclusion criteria of isolated olecranon fractures. TB was used for fixation in 43 patients and ORIF in 134. No statistical significance was found when comparing complication rates in open versus closed olecranon fractures. In a multivariate analysis, the key factor in outcome was method of fixation. Overall, there were higher rates of infection and hardware removal in the TB compared with the ORIF group.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that the dominant factor driving re-operation in isolated olecranon fractures is type of fixation. When controlling for all variables, there is an increased chance of re-operation in patients with TB fixation.     

Delayed ORIF of proximal humerus fractures at a minimum of 3 weeks from injury: a functional outcome study

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical results of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in proximal humerus fractures with delayed presentation.

Design

Retrospective comparative study.

Setting

Level III.

Methods

From June 2005 to June 2010, thirty-nine (39) proximal humerus fractures were treated with ORIF after a delay of 21–120 days from the initial injury. Patients were divided into three groups: (1) isolated 2-part greater tuberosity fractures; (2) part surgical neck fractures; and (3) 3- and 4-part complex fractures. The range of motion (ROM), visual analogue scale (VAS), Constant–Murley score, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) scoring system score and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score were all recorded. The results were analyzed with the use of the Mann–Whitney U test and stratified by age, gender, side of injury, interval from injury to surgery, and postoperative functional results. Additionally, the results of different fracture types and complications were compared across the three groups.

Results

The mean forward flexion was 143.8° ± 28.9°, external rotation was 33.2° ± 19.6°, and internal rotation was up to the T10 level. The mean VAS was 0.8 ± 1.2; the mean Constant score was 82.0 ± 15.0; the UCLA score was 27.2 ± 7.1; and the mean SST was 9.5 ± 2.0 at the last follow-up. There were no significant differences among the three groups except in internal rotation. Compared to those without any complications, patients with complications demonstrated worse ROM and a lower functional score (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Delayed treatment of proximal humerus fractures is a challenging problem. With appropriate surgical technique, satisfactory results can be expected with respect to different fracture types, and complications may be avoided regardless of delay.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic Level IV.     

Titanium elastic nails,open reduction internal fixation and non-operative management for middle third clavicle fractures: a comparative study

Objectives

To compare clinical outcomes between titanium elastic nails (TENS), open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and non-operative treatment options at mean 30 months in Allman type 1 fractures of the clavicle.

Design

Retrospective case matched.

Setting

Tertiary Trauma Centre, UK.

Patients

Treatment method was based on surgeon choice although there was no difference between groups in terms of age or gender. Those treated non-operatively tended to have a less severe fracture pattern. There were 25 patients treated with TENS, 24 with ORIF and 41 treated conservatively. Main outcome measurements are qDASH questionnaire, patient satisfaction question and clinical complication rate.

Results

Patients managed with TENS had significantly better clinical outcomes than both plate fixation and non-operatively managed groups.

Conclusions

This study supports the use of TENS fixation of middle third clavicle fractures in significantly displaced Allman type 1 injuries.     

Radial head prosthesis in complex elbow dislocations: effect of oversizing and comparison with ORIF

Purpose

Elbow dislocations with complex elbow instability (CEI) and unstable radial head fractures require reconstruction by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) if possible or alternatively by a radial head prosthesis. The aim of this study was to determine the differential outcome of both strategies and to investigate the contribution of prosthesis-related radiographic factors such as oversizing on clinical outcome.

Methods

A total of 53 patients underwent ligament and coronoid refixation, and radial head reconstruction by ORIF (n?=?18; group 1) or by monopolar modular prosthesis (n?=?35; group 2). Patients were followed by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and a radiological score including prosthesis oversizing, joint subluxation, ossifications, capitellar erosions, implant loosening and ulno-humeral osteoarthritis. To investigate the effect of oversizing, group 2 was subdivided by prosthesis overlenghtening?≥?2 mm.

Results

A total of 42 patients (79.2 %) could be followed for 3.0?±?1.3 years with an average MEPS of 76.8?±?17.2. Patients with ORIF had slightly better MEPS (82.1?±?9.9) as compared with group 2 (74.7?±?19.1) though three ORIF patients required an early conversion to prosthesis. In group 2, oversizing occurred frequently and 50 % showed an overlenghtening?≥?2 mm. Oversizing significantly decreased MEPS (63.2?±?21.3 vs 84.7?±?9.0; p?=?0.001) and elbow range of motion and increased the occurrence of other radiological abnormalities and the risk for surgical revisions. The radiological score and prosthesis overlenghtening but not prosthesis diameter showed an inverse correlation with MEPS.

Conclusions

In CEI a radial head reconstruction with a prosthesis demonstrates similarly good clinical results as compared to ORIF in anatomically sized prosthesis, but prosthesis oversizing could induce other radiographic abnormalities with then deteriorated outcome.     

Open reduction and internal-fixation versus radial head replacement in treatment of Mason type III radial head fractures

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate whether open reduction and internal-fixation (ORIF) was superior to radial head replacement in treatment of Mason type III radial head fractures by comparing postoperative complication rate and satisfactory rate.

Methods

Clinical trials comparing ORIF with radial head replacement for Mason type III radial head fractures were reviewed published up to September 1, 2012. Methodological quality of each included trials was assessed using the Jadad scale. The analyses were performed with Cochrane RevMan software version 5.1.

Results

One prospective randomized controlled trial and one comparative study involving 67 patients with 67 cases were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Both the forest plots of complication rate and satisfactory rate indicated statistical differences between the two surgical techniques in treatment of Mason type III radial head fractures. The complication rate was 13.9 % in patients treated with radial head replacement and 58.1 % in patients treated with ORIF. The satisfactory rate was 91.7 % in patients treated with radial head replacement and 51.6 % in patients treated with ORIF.

Conclusions

Given the available evidence, radial head replacement appeared to reach better outcomes in patients with Mason type III radial head fractures followed 5 years or less.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic II.     

Treatment of three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures with locking proximal humerus plate

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and complications of the locking proximal humerus plate to treat proximal humerus fractures.

Design

A retrospective clinical trial.

Setting

Department of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital.

Patients

Sixty-eight consecutive patients with three- or four-part fractures of the proximal humerus were treated with locking proximal humerus plates.

Intervention

The deltopectoral anterolateral acromial approach was used to the proximal humerus; open reduction and locking proximal humerus plate were applied.

Main outcome measurements

Constant Score was used to measure the shoulder functional recovery, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to measure subjective evaluation of pain. The radiology was observed.

Results

After average 26.7 months, the average Constant Score was 72.6 ± 13.2 points and the average VAS was 1.2 ± 0.8 points. All the complications such as screw perforation into the glenohumeral joint, screws loosening, soft tissue infections, avascular necrosis and delayed union occurred in eight cases (11.8 %).

Conclusions

The effectiveness of the locking proximal humerus plate was similar to other published literatures on treating fractures of the proximal humerus; however, a lower complications rate in short follow-up time was observed in this study. It may potentially provide a favorable option for treating three- or four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. Dealing with each particular fracture pattern, surgeons should have a decision of appropriate way to internal fixation.     

Surgical result of plate osteosynthesis using a locking plate system through an anterior humeral approach for distal shaft fracture of the humerus that occurred during a throwing motion

Purpose

This paper analyzed outcomes of the osteosynthesis with a locking plate system for the fractures of the humerus in throwers using the anterior humeral approach.

Methods

Retrospective case series including 31 patients. Bone union was assessed through follow-up radiographs. Results of visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, range of motion in the elbow joint, time of return to work, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) were evaluated to determine functional outcomes. Direction and length of the fracture, the distal cortical length, the humeral diameter, and the total humeral length were measured as part of fracture configuration analysis.

Results

Mean patient age was 25.8 (range, 18–34) years. The follow-up average was 16.0 months (range, 12–23). Delayed union was observed in one (3.1 %) patient. Mean final VAS was 0.4 (range, 0–2), mean time of return to work was 18.2 weeks (range, 13–36), and mean MEPS was 96.3 (range, 88–100) points. All fractures showed a spiral configuration. Mean fracture length was 79.7 (95 % CI, 72.6-86.7) mm, and mean distal cortical length was 48.3 (95 % CI, 37.8-58.8) mm.

Conclusions

The results of the current study indicates that plate osteosynthesis using a locking plate system combined with interfragmentary lag screws through anterior humeral approach may be a favorable option for the surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures in throwers.

     

Comparison of two-staged ORIF and limited internal fixation with external fixator for closed tibial plafond fractures

Objective

To compare the results of two-staged open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and limited internal fixation with external fixator (LIFEF) for closed tibial plafond fractures.

Methods

From January 2005 to June 2007, 56 patients with closed type B3 or C Pilon fractures were randomly allocated into groups I and II. Two-staged ORIF was performed in group I and LIFEF in group II. The outcome measures included bone union, nonunion, malunion, pin-tract infection, wound infection, osteomyelitis, ankle joint function, etc. These postoperative data were analyzed with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 13.0.

Results

Incidence of superficial soft tissue infection (involved in wound infection or pin-tract infection) in group I was lower than that in group II (P < 0.05), with significant difference. Group I has significantly less radiation exposure (P < 0.001). Group II had higher rates of malunion, delayed union, and arthritis symptoms, with no statistical significance. Both groups resulted similar ankle joint function. Logistic regression analysis indicated that smoking and fracture pattern were the two factors significantly influencing the final outcomes.

Conclusions

In the treatment of closed tibial plafond fractures, both two-staged ORIF and LIFEF offer similar results. Patients undergo LIFEF carry significantly greater radiation exposure and higher superficial soft tissue infection rate (usually occurs on pin tract and does not affect the final outcomes).     

Digastric trochanteric flip osteotomy and surgical dislocation of hip in the management of acetabular fractures

Objectives

To assess the efficacy and safety of digastric trochanteric flip osteotomy technique in the management of acetabular fractures and to evaluate surgical outcome in terms of fracture reduction, femoral head viability of selected acetabular fractures treated operatively using a digastric trochanteric flip osteotomy and a modified Kocher–Langenbeck approach with surgical dislocation of the femoral head.

Design

Prospective.

Patients

Eighteen patients predominantly with combined transverse and posterior wall fractures or multifragmentary posterior wall fractures.

Outcome evaluation

Clinical and radiographic analysis after a minimum 18 months follow-up.

Methods

A single modified approach involving digastric trochanteric flip osteotomy and a modified Kocher–Langenbeck approach with anterior (n = 14) or posterior (n = 4) surgical dislocation of the femoral head, was done for one or more of following reasons: intra-articular assessment of reduction in fractures with comminution, marginal impaction and involvement of the anterior column, removal of intra-articular fragments, and confirmation of extra-articular screw placement.

Results

At a mean follow-up of 26 months (18–40 months), the 17 patients presented with a good to excellent clinical result according to the d’Aubigné score. In all subjects, anatomical reduction was achieved during surgery. The osteotomy site healed at an average of 7 weeks and all the patients recovered abductor strength at 12 weeks. One avascular necrosis occurred in a case of posterior column plus wall fracture (who presented to us after 3 weeks). No heterotopic ossification interfering with hip function was found.

Conclusion

This technique gives good exposure (especially in posterior wall, dome area, posterior fracture-dislocation with intra-articular fragments/femoral head fractures and T-fractures), preservation of abductor strength (which may be lost with excessive retraction of abductors to see dome area in classical posterior approach), reliable healing of osteotomy (in contrast to conventional trochanteric osteotomy) without risking the vascularity of femoral head.     

Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for complex humeral fractures: a 5 to 10-year follow-up retrospective study

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to review our experience with proximal humeral locking plates, including complications, functional outcomes, strength recovery and predictors of successful treatment.

Methods

Seventy unstable proximal humeral fractures were treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with the use of locking proximal humerus plate. At an average follow-up of 31 months, the clinical and subjective outcomes were evaluated, and complication was analysed.

Results

The average Constant score was 72. The mean disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score was 23. The average range of motion was as follows: mean range of anterior elevation and abduction 120°–150°; external rotation in abduction 64° and in adduction 44°; and internal rotation T12.

Conclusion

On the basis of the overall functional and clinical outcome obtained, it is possible to suggest that the ORIF of the proximal humerus fractures using locking plate represents a helpful option that can lead to a good clinical and functional outcome even in the most complex fractures. Level of evidence, Case Series, Treatment Study, Level IV.     

An evaluation of supracondylar humerus fractures: is there a correlation between postponing treatment and the need for open surgical intervention?

Purpose

The goal of this study was to evaluate the treatment and recovery of patients treated for Gartland type III supracondylar humerus fractures in order to determine if postponing treatment leads to a higher rate of open surgical treatment or complications.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted examining the medical records of children with Gartland type III supracondylar humerus fractures at our institution for a two-year period. The patients included in the study were treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).

Results

After exclusions, 134 patients were included in the study, with an average age of 5.6 years. The patients were grouped according to whether their treatment was postponed (39.6 %) or immediate (60.4 %). The majority of all patients were treated using CRPP: 46 (86.8 %) of the postponed patients and 75 (92.6 %) of the immediate patients. Very few postsurgical complications occurred in the patients; there was only one (1.6 %) case of iatrogenic nerve injury in a postponed patient as well as four (3.8 %) cases of loss of carrying angle: one (2.3 %) in postponed patients and three (4.8 %) in immediate patients.

Conclusions

Postponing treatment of type III supracondylar humerus fractures in children did not lead to an increase in open surgical treatment; nor did it lead to an increase in complications.     

Posterior fixation of type IV humeral capitellum fractures with fully threaded screws in adolescents

Purpose

Humeral capitellum fractures comprise approximately 1% of all elbow fractures. In this study, we examined the clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes following operative stabilization of Bryan and Morrey type IV fractures of the capitellum in adolescents. We applied headless cannulated screws in a posteroanterior direction without damaging the articular cartilage surface of the fractures.

Methods

Eight adolescent patients (six male, two female) with a mean age of 15 ± 2.1 years (range 13–18 years) were treated for type IV (McKee) humerus capitellum fractures. In the preoperative radiological evaluation, anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and computed tomography (CT) images were performed. A lateral surgical approach was used, and cannulated fully threaded headless screws were applied in a posteroanterior direction as fixation materials in the fracture reduction. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score was used in the evaluation of elbow joint functions.

Results

Patients were followed up for a mean of 24.6 months. Fracture union was achieved at a mean of 5 ± 0.92 weeks (range 4–6 weeks). The mean elbow extension flexion arc was 135° ± 13.47° (range 110°–150º) and the mean pronation supination arc was 156° ± 4.43° (150°–160°). In one patient, there was nonconformity in the humerus trochlea and in another patient, there was keloid formation on the surgical scar. All patients attained excellent results according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score.

Conclusions

In the treatment of type IV capitellum fractures in adolescents, open reduction with a lateral surgical approach and fixation using posteroanterior directed, cannulated, fully threaded, headless screws is a reliable method to achieve a pain-free functional elbow joint.